//
© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the official source for authoritative text.
Queensland act
**What this law does (in plain English)
Consolidates common rules that apply across Queensland resource laws (mining, petroleum & gas, geothermal and greenhouse gas storage). It gathers shared processes into one Act so those Resource Acts can be simpler (see s 3–4).
Creates a single set of rules for transactions, registrations and notices about resource authorities (the licences, leases and permits that allow resource activities). It covers what counts as a "dealing", when dealings are prohibited, which dealings must be approved by the Minister or simply notified and how registration works (see ch 2, pt 1, esp. ss 16–23, 17A).
Establishes a public register of resource authorities, dealings, caveats and related instruments and requires the chief executive to keep and publish it (ss 197–201). Many filings and notices must be lodged in the register and some recorded agreements must be placed on land title (s 92).
Sets out how access to land for resource work is managed. Different rules apply depending on whether the land is private, public or "restricted" (near houses, schools, water infrastructure, etc.). The Act specifies notice requirements before entry, when consent or a conduct & compensation agreement is required for "advanced" activities, when an owner may opt out, and when expedited or published notices are allowed (ch 3, pts 2–4, esp. ss 39–46, 43–45, 68–70).
Creates a uniform system for caveats and associated agreements so interested parties can record claims or agreements against a resource authority (ss 24–35).
Want the full deep dive?
Zoe can write the in-depth analysis on top of the summary above: how it works, who it affects and what each part actually does.
Direct links to the current provisions in Mineral and Energy Resources (Common Provisions) Act 2014.
Zoe has indexed the source text for search and analysis. Use the official register for the original document and download formats.
View on official registerSourced from Queensland Legislation (legislation.qld.gov.au), CC BY 4.0.
Establishes negotiation, ADR (alternative dispute resolution), arbitration and Land Court routes for resolving access, compensation and overlap disputes. It requires good‑faith negotiation, sets minimum negotiation periods and provides for conferences, ADR, arbitration and Land Court determinations (ch 3 pt 7 and ch 5, ch 7A; see ss 83–96, 88, 91A, 96, 177–183, 196K–196R).
Provides a detailed statutory framework for overlapping coal and coal seam gas authorities. It defines "overlapping areas", sets up notice regimes (advance notice, 18‑month notice, confirmation, RMA notices), how initial mining areas (IMAs), future mining areas (FMAs) and rolling mining areas (RMAs) are identified, and how sole or joint occupancy operates. It also creates duties to exchange operational information and to produce agreed joint development plans (chapter 4, esp. ss 102–136, 115–135, 154–156).
Sets out compensation rules when coal mining interferes with coal seam gas production or infrastructure (and vice versa). It defines categories of gas infrastructure (major/minor/connecting), lost production, reconciliation payments and replacement gas, and how compensation is calculated, mitigated and recovered; it also provides for arbitration or Land Court review of compensation disputes (ss 161–174).
Who is affected
Resource authority holders: mining lease holders, petroleum lease and ATP holders, geothermal and greenhouse gas authority holders. They must follow notice, information-sharing, registration, access and compensation rules (multiple parts; see ss 10, 16, 39, 154, 81, 167–172).
Landowners and occupiers: private landowners, public land authorities and public road authorities are given rights to notice, to negotiate conduct & compensation agreements, to refuse unreasonable access, and to seek compensation and court orders (see ch 3 pts 2–4 and ch 3 pt 7; e.g. ss 39, 43, 47–53, 81–92).
Government decision‑makers and regulators: the Minister (approvals and some ministerial powers), the chief executive (register, approvals processing, information collection), authorised officers, and the Land Court and prescribed arbitration institutes (see ss 19, 197, 174B–174D, 177–183).
Why it matters (mechanics, incentives, costs and trade-offs)
Centralises and standardises processes. By moving common rules into one Act (s 3–4), companies and landholders face one consistent set of access, notice and dealing rules instead of different rules in each Resource Act. That reduces duplication of law-making but concentrates administrative discretion (Minister, chief executive) in a single framework (see s 6 on how this Act interacts with Resource Acts).
Alters who decides and when. Several transactions now require either ministerial approval (prescribed dealings) or notification to the chief executive before taking effect (ss 17–19, 17A, 23). That changes timing and creates an administrative gatekeeping role: applicants must plan for processing time, additional conditions and potential security requirements (s 22).
Shifts some costs onto resource authority holders. Holders generally bear: fees and registration costs (ss 197–200); negotiation and preparation costs of landholders (s 91); compensation and replacement obligations when mining affects gas production or assets (ss 167–174); and sometimes arbitration costs (ss 181, 196R). The Act also allows the Minister or regulation to alter rent calculation or defer rent in prescribed hardship circumstances (ss 204A–204B).
Imposes recurring compliance and information burdens. Resource holders must exchange annual operational information and hold at least one annual joint meeting for overlapping areas (ss 154–155). Recipients of shared information are limited in use and must keep confidentiality (s 156); failure to respect confidential limits triggers compensation and disgorgement of gain (s 156(4)–(6)).
Creates multiple, layered dispute-resolution paths. The Act pushes parties first to negotiate, then ADR, then arbitration or Land Court. Arbitration awards are final (subject to jurisdictional review) and binding on successors/assigns; Land Court orders may be broader and can impose non-monetary remedies (ss 91F, 97, 101A–101C, 177–183). Those layers increase certainty of finality but add procedural complexity and potential cost of repeated steps.
Allocates concentrated benefits and diffuse costs. Examples: an ML (coal) holder can obtain sole occupancy of an IMA or RMA by following the notice regime (s 120), which is a concentrated operational benefit for the holder; the corresponding PL or ATP holder faces potential compensation exposures (ss 167–172), a dispersed cost spread across gas producers. Where holders can negotiate alternatives (agreed joint development plans, s 130), private contracting can reallocate costs and rights.
Leaves important details to regulation and instruments. Key calculations (lost production, replacement or replacement‑cost principles, fees, and definitions of prescribed dealings) are implemented by regulation or the chief executive’s practice manual (e.g. ss 161–163, 200, 202). That creates flexibility but also implementation risk: dispute outcomes may depend heavily on regulatory design and administrative practice.
Practical consequences for behaviour
Resource companies must plan earlier and communicate more: give advance/confirmation/18‑month/RMA notices, prepare joint development plans, and participate in information exchanges and annual meetings (ss 121–125, 130, 154–155).
Landowners are given formal negotiation rights and may require conduct & compensation agreements for advanced activities (ss 43, 83). They can opt out or seek ADR, arbitration or Land Court decisions (ss 45, 88, 91A, 96).
When overlapping coal and gas tenures arise, holders face statutory timelines and compensation mechanics that can change project timing and capital plans. For example, an acceleration notice by an ML (coal) holder can shift mining commencement dates and trigger compensation (s 128, s 167).
Key references for mechanics cited above: ss 3–6 (purpose/operation with Resource Acts); ss 16–23 (dealings, registration, approvals); ss 24–31 (caveats); ss 36, 39–46, 43–45, 54 (land access and entry notices); ss 57–65 (public land and roads); ss 68–71 (restricted land and consent); ss 81–92 and ss 96–101 (compensation, conduct & compensation agreements, Land Court jurisdiction); ch 4 (overlap framework, esp. ss 102–136, 115–135, 154–156); ss 161–174 (compensation mechanics for overlaps); ss 177–183 (arbitration); ss 197–201 (register).