This Act defines, recognises and protects Aboriginal cultural heritage in Queensland, creates an enforceable duty of care for activities that may harm heritage (s.23–26), and sets ownership/custody rules for human remains and sacred objects (s.15–20).
It requires sponsors to give notices and fund studies and assessors (s.56–61, s.68), may require approved cultural heritage management plans before other project approvals (s.87–88), and vests recording and approval discretion in the chief executive and Minister while authorising officers are given entry, inspection and enforcement powers (s.71–74, s.121–139).
The Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 (Qld) establishes a comprehensive statutory framework for the identification, ownership, protection and management of Aboriginal cultural heritage throughout Queensland. At its heart, s 4 declares the main purpose to be “effective recognition, protection and conservation of Aboriginal cultural heritage”. This purpose is underpinned by five principles in s 5 that emphasise respect for Aboriginal knowledge, the primacy of Aboriginal people as “primary guardians, keepers and knowledge holders”, the need to maintain traditional practices, the cultural importance of reaffirming obligations to “law and country”, and the desirability of timely, efficient processes.
The Act achieves these aims through several interlocking mechanisms. First, it clarifies ownership. Part 2 vests ownership of human remains in Aboriginal people with traditional or familial links (s 15) and does likewise for secret or sacred objects held by the State (s 19). Other cultural heritage is owned by the State unless it has passed to an Aboriginal party or been lawfully transferred (s 20). Surface rights of landowners are preserved provided they do not unlawfully harm heritage (s 21).
Second, the Act imposes a general cultural heritage duty of care (s 23). Any person carrying out an activity must take all reasonable and practicable measures to avoid harm to Aboriginal cultural heritage. Breach attracts significant penalties—up to 1,000 penalty units for an individual or 10,000 for a corporation. Courts assessing compliance may consider consultation undertaken, surveys conducted, database searches, compliance with duty-of-care guidelines, and the history of past land use (s 23(2)). A number of defences are provided, including acting under an approved cultural heritage management plan, a native title agreement, an emergency, or ownership of the heritage itself (s 23(3)).
Current sections
Direct links to the current provisions in Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003.
215
pt.1
Preliminary
Preliminary
pt.1-div.1
Introduction
Introduction
sec.1
Short title
sec.1 Short title
This Act may be cited as the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 .
sec.2
Commencement
sec.2 Commencement
This Act commences on a day to be fixed by proclamation.
sec.3
Act binds all persons
sec.3 Act binds all persons
This Act binds all persons including the State and, to the extent the legislative power of the Parliament permits, the Commonwealth and the other States.
Nothing in this Act makes the State liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
(sec.3-ssec.1) This Act binds all persons including the State and, to the extent the legislative power of the Parliament permits, the Commonwealth and the other States.
(sec.3-ssec.2) Nothing in this Act makes the State liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
pt.1-div.2
Purpose of Act
Purpose of Act
sec.4
Main purpose of Act
sec.4 Main purpose of Act
The main purpose of this Act is to provide effective recognition, protection and conservation of Aboriginal cultural heritage.
sec.5
Principles underlying Act’s main purpose
sec.5 Principles underlying Act’s main purpose
The following fundamental principles underlie this Act’s main purpose—
the recognition, protection and conservation of Aboriginal cultural heritage should be based on respect for Aboriginal knowledge, culture and traditional practices;
Aboriginal people should be recognised as the primary guardians, keepers and knowledge holders of Aboriginal cultural heritage;
it is important to respect, preserve and maintain knowledge, innovations and practices of Aboriginal communities and to promote understanding of Aboriginal cultural heritage;
activities involved in recognition, protection and conservation of Aboriginal cultural heritage are important because they allow Aboriginal people to reaffirm their obligations to ‘law and country’;
there is a need to establish timely and efficient processes for the management of activities that may harm Aboriginal cultural heritage.
(a) the recognition, protection and conservation of Aboriginal cultural heritage should be based on respect for Aboriginal knowledge, culture and traditional practices;
(b) Aboriginal people should be recognised as the primary guardians, keepers and knowledge holders of Aboriginal cultural heritage;
(c) it is important to respect, preserve and maintain knowledge, innovations and practices of Aboriginal communities and to promote understanding of Aboriginal cultural heritage;
(d) activities involved in recognition, protection and conservation of Aboriginal cultural heritage are important because they allow Aboriginal people to reaffirm their obligations to ‘law and country’;
(e) there is a need to establish timely and efficient processes for the management of activities that may harm Aboriginal cultural heritage.
sec.6
How main purpose of Act is to be achieved
sec.6 How main purpose of Act is to be achieved
For achieving effective recognition, protection and conservation of Aboriginal cultural heritage, this Act provides for the following—
recognising Aboriginal ownership of Aboriginal human remains wherever held;
recognising Aboriginal ownership of Aboriginal cultural heritage of a secret or sacred nature held in State collections;
recognising Aboriginal ownership of Aboriginal cultural heritage that is lawfully taken away from an area by an Aboriginal party for the area;
establishing a duty of care for activities that may harm Aboriginal cultural heritage;
establishing powers of protection, investigation and enforcement;
establishing a database and a register for recording Aboriginal cultural heritage;
ensuring Aboriginal people are involved in processes for managing the recognition, protection and conservation of Aboriginal cultural heritage;
establishing a process for the comprehensive study of Aboriginal cultural heritage;
establishing processes for the timely and efficient management of activities to avoid or minimise harm to Aboriginal cultural heritage.
(a) recognising Aboriginal ownership of Aboriginal human remains wherever held;
(b) recognising Aboriginal ownership of Aboriginal cultural heritage of a secret or sacred nature held in State collections;
(c) recognising Aboriginal ownership of Aboriginal cultural heritage that is lawfully taken away from an area by an Aboriginal party for the area;
(d) establishing a duty of care for activities that may harm Aboriginal cultural heritage;
(e) establishing powers of protection, investigation and enforcement;
(f) establishing a database and a register for recording Aboriginal cultural heritage;
(g) ensuring Aboriginal people are involved in processes for managing the recognition, protection and conservation of Aboriginal cultural heritage;
(h) establishing a process for the comprehensive study of Aboriginal cultural heritage;
(i) establishing processes for the timely and efficient management of activities to avoid or minimise harm to Aboriginal cultural heritage.
pt.1-div.3
Interpretation
Interpretation
sec.7
Definitions
sec.7 Definitions
The dictionary in schedule 2 defines particular words used in this Act.
sec.8
Meaning of Aboriginal cultural heritage
sec.8 Meaning of Aboriginal cultural heritage
Aboriginal cultural heritage is anything that is—
a significant Aboriginal area in Queensland; or
a significant Aboriginal object; or
evidence, of archaeological or historic significance, of Aboriginal occupation of an area of Queensland.
(a) a significant Aboriginal area in Queensland; or
(b) a significant Aboriginal object; or
(c) evidence, of archaeological or historic significance, of Aboriginal occupation of an area of Queensland.
sec.9
Meaning of significant Aboriginal area
sec.9 Meaning of significant Aboriginal area
A significant Aboriginal area is an area of particular significance to Aboriginal people because of either or both of the following—
Aboriginal tradition;
Under the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 , section 36 (Meaning of commonly used words and expressions), Aboriginal tradition means the body of traditions, observances, customs and beliefs of Aboriginal people generally or of a particular community or group of Aboriginal people, and includes any such traditions, observances, customs and beliefs relating to particular persons, areas, objects or relationships.
the history, including contemporary history, of any Aboriginal party for the area.
(a) Aboriginal tradition; Editor’s note— Under the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 , section 36 (Meaning of commonly used words and expressions), Aboriginal tradition means the body of traditions, observances, customs and beliefs of Aboriginal people generally or of a particular community or group of Aboriginal people, and includes any such traditions, observances, customs and beliefs relating to particular persons, areas, objects or relationships.
(b) the history, including contemporary history, of any Aboriginal party for the area.
sec.10
Meaning of significant Aboriginal object
sec.10 Meaning of significant Aboriginal object
A significant Aboriginal object is an object of particular significance to Aboriginal people because of either or both of the following—
Aboriginal tradition;
the history, including contemporary history, of an Aboriginal party for an area.
(a) Aboriginal tradition;
(b) the history, including contemporary history, of an Aboriginal party for an area.
sec.11
Extension of evidence of occupation to surroundings
sec.11 Extension of evidence of occupation to surroundings
If a particular object or structure is evidence of Aboriginal occupation, the area immediately surrounding the object or structure is also evidence of Aboriginal occupation to the extent the area can not be separated from the object or structure without destroying or diminishing the object or structure’s significance as evidence of Aboriginal occupation.
sec.12
Identifying significant Aboriginal areas
sec.12 Identifying significant Aboriginal areas
This section gives more information about identifying significant Aboriginal areas.
For an area to be a significant Aboriginal area, it is not necessary for the area to contain markings or other physical evidence indicating Aboriginal occupation or otherwise denoting the area’s significance.
For example, the area might be a ceremonial place, a birthing place, a burial place or the site of a massacre.
Also, if significant Aboriginal objects exist in an area and the significance of the objects is intrinsically linked with their location in the area—
the existence of the objects in the area is enough on its own to make the area a significant Aboriginal area; and
if it is reasonably appropriate under this Act, the immediate area and the objects in it may be taken to be, collectively, a significant Aboriginal area.
For identifying a significant Aboriginal area, regard may be had to authoritative anthropological, biogeographical, historical and archaeological information.
(sec.12-ssec.1) This section gives more information about identifying significant Aboriginal areas.
(sec.12-ssec.2) For an area to be a significant Aboriginal area, it is not necessary for the area to contain markings or other physical evidence indicating Aboriginal occupation or otherwise denoting the area’s significance.
(sec.12-ssec.3) For example, the area might be a ceremonial place, a birthing place, a burial place or the site of a massacre.
(sec.12-ssec.4) Also, if significant Aboriginal objects exist in an area and the significance of the objects is intrinsically linked with their location in the area— the existence of the objects in the area is enough on its own to make the area a significant Aboriginal area; and if it is reasonably appropriate under this Act, the immediate area and the objects in it may be taken to be, collectively, a significant Aboriginal area.
(sec.12-ssec.5) For identifying a significant Aboriginal area, regard may be had to authoritative anthropological, biogeographical, historical and archaeological information.
(a) the existence of the objects in the area is enough on its own to make the area a significant Aboriginal area; and
(b) if it is reasonably appropriate under this Act, the immediate area and the objects in it may be taken to be, collectively, a significant Aboriginal area.
sec.13
Interpretation to support existing rights and interests
sec.13 Interpretation to support existing rights and interests
A provision of this Act must not be interpreted in a way that would allow the provision to operate in a way that prejudices—
a right of ownership of a traditional group of Aboriginal people, or of a member of a traditional group of Aboriginal people, in Aboriginal cultural heritage used or held for traditional purposes under Aboriginal tradition; or
a person’s enjoyment or use of, or free access to, Aboriginal cultural heritage, if—
the person usually lives according to Aboriginal tradition as it relates to a particular group of Aboriginal people; and
the access, enjoyment or use is sanctioned by the Aboriginal tradition; or
native title rights and interests.
(a) a right of ownership of a traditional group of Aboriginal people, or of a member of a traditional group of Aboriginal people, in Aboriginal cultural heritage used or held for traditional purposes under Aboriginal tradition; or
(b) a person’s enjoyment or use of, or free access to, Aboriginal cultural heritage, if— (i) the person usually lives according to Aboriginal tradition as it relates to a particular group of Aboriginal people; and (ii) the access, enjoyment or use is sanctioned by the Aboriginal tradition; or
(i) the person usually lives according to Aboriginal tradition as it relates to a particular group of Aboriginal people; and
(ii) the access, enjoyment or use is sanctioned by the Aboriginal tradition; or
(c) native title rights and interests.
(i) the person usually lives according to Aboriginal tradition as it relates to a particular group of Aboriginal people; and
(ii) the access, enjoyment or use is sanctioned by the Aboriginal tradition; or
pt.2
Ownership, custodianship and possession of Aboriginal cultural heritage
Ownership, custodianship and possession of Aboriginal cultural heritage
pt.2-div.1
Preliminary
Preliminary
sec.14
Object and intent
sec.14 Object and intent
The object of this part is to make rules about ownership, custodianship and possession of Aboriginal cultural heritage.
The basic intent underlying the rules stated in this part is that Aboriginal cultural heritage should be protected.
A supporting intent is that, as far as practicable, Aboriginal cultural heritage should be owned and protected by Aboriginal people with traditional or familial links to the cultural heritage if it is comprised of any of the following—
Aboriginal human remains;
secret or sacred objects;
Aboriginal cultural heritage lawfully taken away from an area.
Another supporting intent is that Aboriginal cultural heritage of the type mentioned in subsection (3) (a) or (b) that is in the custody of the State, including the Queensland Museum, should continue to be protected by the State until it can be transferred into the protection of its Aboriginal owners.
(sec.14-ssec.1) The object of this part is to make rules about ownership, custodianship and possession of Aboriginal cultural heritage.
(sec.14-ssec.2) The basic intent underlying the rules stated in this part is that Aboriginal cultural heritage should be protected.
(sec.14-ssec.3) A supporting intent is that, as far as practicable, Aboriginal cultural heritage should be owned and protected by Aboriginal people with traditional or familial links to the cultural heritage if it is comprised of any of the following— Aboriginal human remains; secret or sacred objects; Aboriginal cultural heritage lawfully taken away from an area.
(sec.14-ssec.4) Another supporting intent is that Aboriginal cultural heritage of the type mentioned in subsection (3) (a) or (b) that is in the custody of the State, including the Queensland Museum, should continue to be protected by the State until it can be transferred into the protection of its Aboriginal owners.
(a) Aboriginal human remains;
(b) secret or sacred objects;
(c) Aboriginal cultural heritage lawfully taken away from an area.
pt.2-div.2
Aboriginal human remains
Aboriginal human remains
sec.15
Ownership of Aboriginal human remains
sec.15 Ownership of Aboriginal human remains
On the commencement of this section, Aboriginal people who have a traditional or familial link with Aboriginal human remains in existence immediately before the commencement become the owners of the human remains if they are not already the owners.
Subsection (1) applies regardless of who may have owned the Aboriginal human remains before the commencement of this section.
(sec.15-ssec.1) On the commencement of this section, Aboriginal people who have a traditional or familial link with Aboriginal human remains in existence immediately before the commencement become the owners of the human remains if they are not already the owners.
(sec.15-ssec.2) Subsection (1) applies regardless of who may have owned the Aboriginal human remains before the commencement of this section.
sec.16
Aboriginal human remains in custody of State
sec.16 Aboriginal human remains in custody of State
This section applies to Aboriginal human remains if the human remains are in the custody of an entity that represents or is the State.
The persons who own the human remains may at any time ask the entity—
to continue to be the custodian of the human remains; or
to return the human remains to them.
If the entity is satisfied the persons making the request under subsection (2) are the owners of the human remains, the entity must comply with the request to the greatest practicable extent.
The persons who own the human remains are not limited to making only 1 request under subsection (2) .
The owners could ask for the Queensland Museum to continue its custody of the human remains while they make suitable arrangements for dealing with the human remains, at which time they could ask for the human remains to be returned to them.
(sec.16-ssec.1) This section applies to Aboriginal human remains if the human remains are in the custody of an entity that represents or is the State.
(sec.16-ssec.2) The persons who own the human remains may at any time ask the entity— to continue to be the custodian of the human remains; or to return the human remains to them.
(sec.16-ssec.3) If the entity is satisfied the persons making the request under subsection (2) are the owners of the human remains, the entity must comply with the request to the greatest practicable extent.
(sec.16-ssec.4) The persons who own the human remains are not limited to making only 1 request under subsection (2) . The owners could ask for the Queensland Museum to continue its custody of the human remains while they make suitable arrangements for dealing with the human remains, at which time they could ask for the human remains to be returned to them.
(a) to continue to be the custodian of the human remains; or
(b) to return the human remains to them.
sec.17
Possession of Aboriginal human remains
sec.17 Possession of Aboriginal human remains
This section applies to a person, other than the State, if the person has in the person’s possession Aboriginal human remains that were in existence immediately before the commencement of this section and the person does not have the necessary traditional or familial links with the human remains to be the owner of the human remains.
The person must take all reasonable steps to ensure that the human remains are taken into the custody of the chief executive as soon as practicable.
Maximum penalty for subsection (2) —200 penalty units.
(sec.17-ssec.1) This section applies to a person, other than the State, if the person has in the person’s possession Aboriginal human remains that were in existence immediately before the commencement of this section and the person does not have the necessary traditional or familial links with the human remains to be the owner of the human remains.
(sec.17-ssec.2) The person must take all reasonable steps to ensure that the human remains are taken into the custody of the chief executive as soon as practicable. Maximum penalty for subsection (2) —200 penalty units.
sec.18
Knowledge of Aboriginal human remains
sec.18 Knowledge of Aboriginal human remains
This section applies to a person if the person—
knows of the existence and location of Aboriginal human remains, but does not own the human remains or have possession of them; and
knows, or ought reasonably to know, the human remains are, or are reasonably likely to be, Aboriginal human remains; and
knows or suspects—
that the chief executive does not know of the existence of the human remains; or
that the chief executive knows of the existence of the human remains, but does not know the human remains are, or are reasonably likely to be, Aboriginal human remains.
The person must—
as soon as practicable, advise the chief executive of the existence and location of the human remains; and
give the chief executive all details about the nature and location of the human remains the chief executive reasonably requires.
Maximum penalty—100 penalty units.
For subsection (2) , the obligation to advise the chief executive and to give the chief executive details must be complied with—
if all the circumstances giving rise to the obligation arose before the commencement of this section—as soon as practicable after the commencement; or
if all the circumstances giving rise to the obligation arise after the commencement, or if the circumstances arose partly before the commencement and arise partly after the commencement—as soon as practicable after all the circumstances apply.
For subsection (1) (c) , the chief executive is taken to be in possession of any knowledge that was ever in the possession of the Minister mentioned in section 35 of the repealed Act.
(sec.18-ssec.1) This section applies to a person if the person— knows of the existence and location of Aboriginal human remains, but does not own the human remains or have possession of them; and knows, or ought reasonably to know, the human remains are, or are reasonably likely to be, Aboriginal human remains; and knows or suspects— that the chief executive does not know of the existence of the human remains; or that the chief executive knows of the existence of the human remains, but does not know the human remains are, or are reasonably likely to be, Aboriginal human remains.
(sec.18-ssec.2) The person must— as soon as practicable, advise the chief executive of the existence and location of the human remains; and give the chief executive all details about the nature and location of the human remains the chief executive reasonably requires. Maximum penalty—100 penalty units.
(sec.18-ssec.3) For subsection (2) , the obligation to advise the chief executive and to give the chief executive details must be complied with— if all the circumstances giving rise to the obligation arose before the commencement of this section—as soon as practicable after the commencement; or if all the circumstances giving rise to the obligation arise after the commencement, or if the circumstances arose partly before the commencement and arise partly after the commencement—as soon as practicable after all the circumstances apply.
(sec.18-ssec.4) For subsection (1) (c) , the chief executive is taken to be in possession of any knowledge that was ever in the possession of the Minister mentioned in section 35 of the repealed Act.
(a) knows of the existence and location of Aboriginal human remains, but does not own the human remains or have possession of them; and
(b) knows, or ought reasonably to know, the human remains are, or are reasonably likely to be, Aboriginal human remains; and
(c) knows or suspects— (i) that the chief executive does not know of the existence of the human remains; or (ii) that the chief executive knows of the existence of the human remains, but does not know the human remains are, or are reasonably likely to be, Aboriginal human remains.
(i) that the chief executive does not know of the existence of the human remains; or
(ii) that the chief executive knows of the existence of the human remains, but does not know the human remains are, or are reasonably likely to be, Aboriginal human remains.
(i) that the chief executive does not know of the existence of the human remains; or
(ii) that the chief executive knows of the existence of the human remains, but does not know the human remains are, or are reasonably likely to be, Aboriginal human remains.
(a) as soon as practicable, advise the chief executive of the existence and location of the human remains; and
(b) give the chief executive all details about the nature and location of the human remains the chief executive reasonably requires.
(a) if all the circumstances giving rise to the obligation arose before the commencement of this section—as soon as practicable after the commencement; or
(b) if all the circumstances giving rise to the obligation arise after the commencement, or if the circumstances arose partly before the commencement and arise partly after the commencement—as soon as practicable after all the circumstances apply.
pt.2-div.3
Secret and sacred objects
Secret and sacred objects
sec.19
Ownership and custody of secret or sacred object
sec.19 Ownership and custody of secret or sacred object
This section applies to an object that is Aboriginal cultural heritage if—
the object is a secret or sacred object; and
a ceremonial item
the object is, immediately before the commencement of this section, in the custody of an entity that represents or is the State, or after the commencement comes into the custody of an entity that represents or is the State.
The Aboriginal people who have a traditional or familial link with the object, if they are not already the owners, become the owners of the object—
if the object was in the custody of the entity immediately before the commencement of this section—on the commencement; or
otherwise—when the object comes into the custody of the entity.
The persons who own the object may at any time ask the entity—
to continue to be the custodian of the object; or
to return the object to them.
If the entity is satisfied the persons making the request under subsection (3) are the owners of the object, the entity must comply with the request to the greatest practicable extent.
The persons who own the object are not limited to making only 1 request under subsection (3) .
The owners could ask for the Queensland Museum to continue its custody of an object while they make suitable arrangements for dealing with the object, at which time they could ask for the object to be returned to them.
(sec.19-ssec.1) This section applies to an object that is Aboriginal cultural heritage if— the object is a secret or sacred object; and a ceremonial item the object is, immediately before the commencement of this section, in the custody of an entity that represents or is the State, or after the commencement comes into the custody of an entity that represents or is the State.
(sec.19-ssec.2) The Aboriginal people who have a traditional or familial link with the object, if they are not already the owners, become the owners of the object— if the object was in the custody of the entity immediately before the commencement of this section—on the commencement; or otherwise—when the object comes into the custody of the entity.
(sec.19-ssec.3) The persons who own the object may at any time ask the entity— to continue to be the custodian of the object; or to return the object to them.
(sec.19-ssec.4) If the entity is satisfied the persons making the request under subsection (3) are the owners of the object, the entity must comply with the request to the greatest practicable extent.
(sec.19-ssec.5) The persons who own the object are not limited to making only 1 request under subsection (3) . The owners could ask for the Queensland Museum to continue its custody of an object while they make suitable arrangements for dealing with the object, at which time they could ask for the object to be returned to them.
(a) the object is a secret or sacred object; and Example of secret or sacred object— a ceremonial item
(b) the object is, immediately before the commencement of this section, in the custody of an entity that represents or is the State, or after the commencement comes into the custody of an entity that represents or is the State.
(a) if the object was in the custody of the entity immediately before the commencement of this section—on the commencement; or
(b) otherwise—when the object comes into the custody of the entity.
(a) to continue to be the custodian of the object; or
(b) to return the object to them.
pt.2-div.4
Other Aboriginal cultural heritage
Other Aboriginal cultural heritage
sec.20
Ownership of Aboriginal cultural heritage
sec.20 Ownership of Aboriginal cultural heritage
The following Aboriginal cultural heritage is not in the ownership of the State—
human remains and secret or sacred objects owned by Aboriginal people under division 2 or 3 ;
Aboriginal cultural heritage passing into the ownership of an Aboriginal party under this Act;
Aboriginal cultural heritage owned by a person whose ownership is confirmed under a provision of this Act;
Aboriginal cultural heritage owned by a person to whom ownership is lawfully transferred.
Otherwise, the State owns Aboriginal cultural heritage.
Subsection (2) applies to an object or evidence that is Aboriginal cultural heritage even if the object or evidence—
forms, or has previously formed, part of land; or
is located, or has previously been located, in, on or under land.
Subsections (2) and (3) do not operate to give the State ownership of—
land in which is situated an object or evidence that becomes owned by the State under subsection (2) ; or
any other land.
(sec.20-ssec.1) The following Aboriginal cultural heritage is not in the ownership of the State— human remains and secret or sacred objects owned by Aboriginal people under division 2 or 3 ; Aboriginal cultural heritage passing into the ownership of an Aboriginal party under this Act; Aboriginal cultural heritage owned by a person whose ownership is confirmed under a provision of this Act; Aboriginal cultural heritage owned by a person to whom ownership is lawfully transferred.
(sec.20-ssec.2) Otherwise, the State owns Aboriginal cultural heritage.
(sec.20-ssec.3) Subsection (2) applies to an object or evidence that is Aboriginal cultural heritage even if the object or evidence— forms, or has previously formed, part of land; or is located, or has previously been located, in, on or under land.
(sec.20-ssec.4) Subsections (2) and (3) do not operate to give the State ownership of— land in which is situated an object or evidence that becomes owned by the State under subsection (2) ; or any other land.
(a) human remains and secret or sacred objects owned by Aboriginal people under division 2 or 3 ;
(b) Aboriginal cultural heritage passing into the ownership of an Aboriginal party under this Act;
(c) Aboriginal cultural heritage owned by a person whose ownership is confirmed under a provision of this Act;
(d) Aboriginal cultural heritage owned by a person to whom ownership is lawfully transferred.
(a) forms, or has previously formed, part of land; or
(b) is located, or has previously been located, in, on or under land.
(a) land in which is situated an object or evidence that becomes owned by the State under subsection (2) ; or
(b) any other land.
sec.21
Continued use of surface
sec.21 Continued use of surface
This section applies if Aboriginal cultural heritage is located on the surface of land, and—
under the tenure on which the land is held, the owner or occupier of the land is entitled to the use and enjoyment of the surface of the land; or
a person is otherwise entitled to the use and enjoyment of the surface of the land.
Despite the existence of the Aboriginal cultural heritage, the owner or occupier or other person is entitled to the use and enjoyment of the land to the extent that the person does not unlawfully harm the cultural heritage.
(sec.21-ssec.1) This section applies if Aboriginal cultural heritage is located on the surface of land, and— under the tenure on which the land is held, the owner or occupier of the land is entitled to the use and enjoyment of the surface of the land; or a person is otherwise entitled to the use and enjoyment of the surface of the land.
(sec.21-ssec.2) Despite the existence of the Aboriginal cultural heritage, the owner or occupier or other person is entitled to the use and enjoyment of the land to the extent that the person does not unlawfully harm the cultural heritage.
(a) under the tenure on which the land is held, the owner or occupier of the land is entitled to the use and enjoyment of the surface of the land; or
(b) a person is otherwise entitled to the use and enjoyment of the surface of the land.
pt.2-div.5
Role of Queensland Museum
Role of Queensland Museum
sec.22
Care of Aboriginal cultural heritage
sec.22 Care of Aboriginal cultural heritage
The Queensland Museum may act under the Queensland Museum Act 1970 in relation to all Aboriginal cultural heritage in its custody.
Subsection (1) applies subject to the particular requirements of this Act about the ownership, custody or protection of Aboriginal cultural heritage.
The Queensland Museum may at any time accept custody of Aboriginal cultural heritage.
(sec.22-ssec.1) The Queensland Museum may act under the Queensland Museum Act 1970 in relation to all Aboriginal cultural heritage in its custody.
(sec.22-ssec.2) Subsection (1) applies subject to the particular requirements of this Act about the ownership, custody or protection of Aboriginal cultural heritage.
(sec.22-ssec.3) The Queensland Museum may at any time accept custody of Aboriginal cultural heritage.
pt.3
Protection of Aboriginal cultural heritage
Protection of Aboriginal cultural heritage
pt.3-div.1
Key cultural heritage protection provisions
Key cultural heritage protection provisions
sec.23
Cultural heritage duty of care
sec.23 Cultural heritage duty of care
A person who carries out an activity must take all reasonable and practicable measures to ensure the activity does not harm Aboriginal cultural heritage (the cultural heritage duty of care ).
Maximum penalty—
for an individual—1,000 penalty units;
for a corporation—10,000 penalty units.
Without limiting the matters that may be considered by a court required to decide whether a person has complied with the cultural heritage duty of care in carrying out an activity, the court may consider the following—
the nature of the activity, and the likelihood of its causing harm to Aboriginal cultural heritage;
the nature of the Aboriginal cultural heritage likely to be harmed by the activity;
the extent to which the person consulted with Aboriginal parties about the carrying out of the activity, and the results of the consultation;
whether the person carried out a study or survey, of any type, of the area affected by the activity to find out the location and extent of Aboriginal cultural heritage, and the extent of the study or survey;
whether the person searched the database and register for information about the area affected by the activity;
the extent to which the person has complied with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines;
the nature and extent of past uses in the area affected by the activity.
A person who carries out an activity is taken to have complied with the cultural heritage duty of care in relation to Aboriginal cultural heritage if—
the person is acting—
under the authority of another provision of this Act that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or
under an approved cultural heritage management plan that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or
under a native title agreement or another agreement with an Aboriginal party, unless the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly excluded from being subject to the agreement; or
in compliance with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines; or
in compliance with native title protection conditions, but only if the cultural heritage is expressly or impliedly the subject of the conditions; or
the person owns the Aboriginal cultural heritage, or is acting with the owner’s agreement; or
the activity is necessary because of an emergency, including for example, a bushfire or other natural disaster.
(sec.23-ssec.1) A person who carries out an activity must take all reasonable and practicable measures to ensure the activity does not harm Aboriginal cultural heritage (the cultural heritage duty of care ). Maximum penalty— for an individual—1,000 penalty units; for a corporation—10,000 penalty units.
(sec.23-ssec.2) Without limiting the matters that may be considered by a court required to decide whether a person has complied with the cultural heritage duty of care in carrying out an activity, the court may consider the following— the nature of the activity, and the likelihood of its causing harm to Aboriginal cultural heritage; the nature of the Aboriginal cultural heritage likely to be harmed by the activity; the extent to which the person consulted with Aboriginal parties about the carrying out of the activity, and the results of the consultation; whether the person carried out a study or survey, of any type, of the area affected by the activity to find out the location and extent of Aboriginal cultural heritage, and the extent of the study or survey; whether the person searched the database and register for information about the area affected by the activity; the extent to which the person has complied with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines; the nature and extent of past uses in the area affected by the activity.
(sec.23-ssec.3) A person who carries out an activity is taken to have complied with the cultural heritage duty of care in relation to Aboriginal cultural heritage if— the person is acting— under the authority of another provision of this Act that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or under an approved cultural heritage management plan that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or under a native title agreement or another agreement with an Aboriginal party, unless the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly excluded from being subject to the agreement; or in compliance with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines; or in compliance with native title protection conditions, but only if the cultural heritage is expressly or impliedly the subject of the conditions; or the person owns the Aboriginal cultural heritage, or is acting with the owner’s agreement; or the activity is necessary because of an emergency, including for example, a bushfire or other natural disaster.
(a) for an individual—1,000 penalty units;
(b) for a corporation—10,000 penalty units.
(a) the nature of the activity, and the likelihood of its causing harm to Aboriginal cultural heritage;
(b) the nature of the Aboriginal cultural heritage likely to be harmed by the activity;
(c) the extent to which the person consulted with Aboriginal parties about the carrying out of the activity, and the results of the consultation;
(d) whether the person carried out a study or survey, of any type, of the area affected by the activity to find out the location and extent of Aboriginal cultural heritage, and the extent of the study or survey;
(e) whether the person searched the database and register for information about the area affected by the activity;
(f) the extent to which the person has complied with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines;
(g) the nature and extent of past uses in the area affected by the activity.
(a) the person is acting— (i) under the authority of another provision of this Act that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or (ii) under an approved cultural heritage management plan that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or (iii) under a native title agreement or another agreement with an Aboriginal party, unless the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly excluded from being subject to the agreement; or (iv) in compliance with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines; or (v) in compliance with native title protection conditions, but only if the cultural heritage is expressly or impliedly the subject of the conditions; or
(i) under the authority of another provision of this Act that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or
(ii) under an approved cultural heritage management plan that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or
(iii) under a native title agreement or another agreement with an Aboriginal party, unless the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly excluded from being subject to the agreement; or
(iv) in compliance with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines; or
(v) in compliance with native title protection conditions, but only if the cultural heritage is expressly or impliedly the subject of the conditions; or
(b) the person owns the Aboriginal cultural heritage, or is acting with the owner’s agreement; or
(c) the activity is necessary because of an emergency, including for example, a bushfire or other natural disaster.
(i) under the authority of another provision of this Act that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or
(ii) under an approved cultural heritage management plan that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or
(iii) under a native title agreement or another agreement with an Aboriginal party, unless the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly excluded from being subject to the agreement; or
(iv) in compliance with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines; or
(v) in compliance with native title protection conditions, but only if the cultural heritage is expressly or impliedly the subject of the conditions; or
sec.24
Unlawful harm to Aboriginal cultural heritage
sec.24 Unlawful harm to Aboriginal cultural heritage
A person must not harm Aboriginal cultural heritage if the person knows or ought reasonably to know that it is Aboriginal cultural heritage.
Maximum penalty—
for an individual—
if the Aboriginal cultural heritage is a registered significant area or registered significant object—1,000 penalty units or 2 years imprisonment; or
otherwise—1,000 penalty units;
for a corporation—10,000 penalty units.
A person who harms Aboriginal cultural heritage does not commit an offence under subsection (1) if—
the person is acting—
under the authority of another provision of this Act that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or
under an approved cultural heritage management plan that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or
under a native title agreement or another agreement with an Aboriginal party, unless the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly excluded from being subject to the agreement; or
in compliance with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines; or
in compliance with the cultural heritage duty of care; or
in compliance with native title protection conditions, but only if the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly or impliedly the subject of the conditions; or
the person owns the Aboriginal cultural heritage, or is acting with the owner’s agreement; or
the harm is the result of doing an act that is necessary because of an emergency, including for example, a bushfire or other natural disaster.
For subsection (1) , it does not matter whether the circumstances of the person’s knowledge arose before the commencement of this section, or arise after the commencement, or arose partly before the commencement and arise partly after the commencement.
(sec.24-ssec.1) A person must not harm Aboriginal cultural heritage if the person knows or ought reasonably to know that it is Aboriginal cultural heritage. Maximum penalty— for an individual— if the Aboriginal cultural heritage is a registered significant area or registered significant object—1,000 penalty units or 2 years imprisonment; or otherwise—1,000 penalty units; for a corporation—10,000 penalty units.
(sec.24-ssec.2) A person who harms Aboriginal cultural heritage does not commit an offence under subsection (1) if— the person is acting— under the authority of another provision of this Act that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or under an approved cultural heritage management plan that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or under a native title agreement or another agreement with an Aboriginal party, unless the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly excluded from being subject to the agreement; or in compliance with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines; or in compliance with the cultural heritage duty of care; or in compliance with native title protection conditions, but only if the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly or impliedly the subject of the conditions; or the person owns the Aboriginal cultural heritage, or is acting with the owner’s agreement; or the harm is the result of doing an act that is necessary because of an emergency, including for example, a bushfire or other natural disaster.
(sec.24-ssec.3) For subsection (1) , it does not matter whether the circumstances of the person’s knowledge arose before the commencement of this section, or arise after the commencement, or arose partly before the commencement and arise partly after the commencement.
(a) for an individual— (i) if the Aboriginal cultural heritage is a registered significant area or registered significant object—1,000 penalty units or 2 years imprisonment; or (ii) otherwise—1,000 penalty units;
(i) if the Aboriginal cultural heritage is a registered significant area or registered significant object—1,000 penalty units or 2 years imprisonment; or
(ii) otherwise—1,000 penalty units;
(b) for a corporation—10,000 penalty units.
(i) if the Aboriginal cultural heritage is a registered significant area or registered significant object—1,000 penalty units or 2 years imprisonment; or
(ii) otherwise—1,000 penalty units;
(a) the person is acting— (i) under the authority of another provision of this Act that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or (ii) under an approved cultural heritage management plan that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or (iii) under a native title agreement or another agreement with an Aboriginal party, unless the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly excluded from being subject to the agreement; or (iv) in compliance with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines; or (v) in compliance with the cultural heritage duty of care; or (vi) in compliance with native title protection conditions, but only if the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly or impliedly the subject of the conditions; or
(i) under the authority of another provision of this Act that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or
(ii) under an approved cultural heritage management plan that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or
(iii) under a native title agreement or another agreement with an Aboriginal party, unless the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly excluded from being subject to the agreement; or
(iv) in compliance with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines; or
(v) in compliance with the cultural heritage duty of care; or
(vi) in compliance with native title protection conditions, but only if the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly or impliedly the subject of the conditions; or
(b) the person owns the Aboriginal cultural heritage, or is acting with the owner’s agreement; or
(c) the harm is the result of doing an act that is necessary because of an emergency, including for example, a bushfire or other natural disaster.
(i) under the authority of another provision of this Act that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or
(ii) under an approved cultural heritage management plan that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or
(iii) under a native title agreement or another agreement with an Aboriginal party, unless the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly excluded from being subject to the agreement; or
(iv) in compliance with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines; or
(v) in compliance with the cultural heritage duty of care; or
(vi) in compliance with native title protection conditions, but only if the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly or impliedly the subject of the conditions; or
sec.25
Prohibited excavation, relocation and taking away
sec.25 Prohibited excavation, relocation and taking away
A person must not excavate, relocate or take away Aboriginal cultural heritage if the person knows or ought reasonably to know that it is Aboriginal cultural heritage.
Maximum penalty—
for an individual—1,000 penalty units;
for a corporation—10,000 penalty units.
A person who excavates, relocates or takes away Aboriginal cultural heritage does not commit an offence under subsection (1) if—
the person is acting—
under the authority of another provision of this Act that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or
under an approved cultural heritage management plan that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or
under a native title agreement or another agreement with an Aboriginal party, unless the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly excluded from being subject to the agreement; or
in compliance with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines; or
in compliance with the cultural heritage duty of care; or
in compliance with native title protection conditions, but only if the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly or impliedly the subject of the conditions; or
the person owns the Aboriginal cultural heritage, or is acting with the owner’s agreement; or
the excavation, relocation or taking away is necessary because of an emergency, including for example, a bushfire or other natural disaster.
For subsection (1) , it does not matter whether the circumstances of the person’s knowledge arose before the commencement of this section, or arise after the commencement, or arose partly before the commencement and arise partly after the commencement.
(sec.25-ssec.1) A person must not excavate, relocate or take away Aboriginal cultural heritage if the person knows or ought reasonably to know that it is Aboriginal cultural heritage. Maximum penalty— for an individual—1,000 penalty units; for a corporation—10,000 penalty units.
(sec.25-ssec.2) A person who excavates, relocates or takes away Aboriginal cultural heritage does not commit an offence under subsection (1) if— the person is acting— under the authority of another provision of this Act that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or under an approved cultural heritage management plan that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or under a native title agreement or another agreement with an Aboriginal party, unless the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly excluded from being subject to the agreement; or in compliance with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines; or in compliance with the cultural heritage duty of care; or in compliance with native title protection conditions, but only if the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly or impliedly the subject of the conditions; or the person owns the Aboriginal cultural heritage, or is acting with the owner’s agreement; or the excavation, relocation or taking away is necessary because of an emergency, including for example, a bushfire or other natural disaster.
(sec.25-ssec.3) For subsection (1) , it does not matter whether the circumstances of the person’s knowledge arose before the commencement of this section, or arise after the commencement, or arose partly before the commencement and arise partly after the commencement.
(a) for an individual—1,000 penalty units;
(b) for a corporation—10,000 penalty units.
(a) the person is acting— (i) under the authority of another provision of this Act that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or (ii) under an approved cultural heritage management plan that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or (iii) under a native title agreement or another agreement with an Aboriginal party, unless the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly excluded from being subject to the agreement; or (iv) in compliance with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines; or (v) in compliance with the cultural heritage duty of care; or (vi) in compliance with native title protection conditions, but only if the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly or impliedly the subject of the conditions; or
(i) under the authority of another provision of this Act that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or
(ii) under an approved cultural heritage management plan that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or
(iii) under a native title agreement or another agreement with an Aboriginal party, unless the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly excluded from being subject to the agreement; or
(iv) in compliance with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines; or
(v) in compliance with the cultural heritage duty of care; or
(vi) in compliance with native title protection conditions, but only if the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly or impliedly the subject of the conditions; or
(b) the person owns the Aboriginal cultural heritage, or is acting with the owner’s agreement; or
(c) the excavation, relocation or taking away is necessary because of an emergency, including for example, a bushfire or other natural disaster.
(i) under the authority of another provision of this Act that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or
(ii) under an approved cultural heritage management plan that applies to the Aboriginal cultural heritage; or
(iii) under a native title agreement or another agreement with an Aboriginal party, unless the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly excluded from being subject to the agreement; or
(iv) in compliance with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines; or
(v) in compliance with the cultural heritage duty of care; or
(vi) in compliance with native title protection conditions, but only if the Aboriginal cultural heritage is expressly or impliedly the subject of the conditions; or
sec.26
Unlawful possession of Aboriginal cultural heritage
sec.26 Unlawful possession of Aboriginal cultural heritage
A person must not have in the person’s possession an object that is Aboriginal cultural heritage if the person knows or ought reasonably to know that the object is Aboriginal cultural heritage
Maximum penalty—
for an individual—1,000 penalty units;
for a corporation—10,000 penalty units.
A person who has in the person’s possession an object that is Aboriginal cultural heritage does not commit an offence under subsection (1) if—
the person is acting—
under the authority of another provision of this Act that applies to the object; or
under an approved cultural heritage management plan that applies to the object; or
under a native title agreement or another agreement with an Aboriginal party, unless the object is expressly excluded from being subject to the agreement; or
in compliance with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines; or
in compliance with the cultural heritage duty of care; or
in compliance with native title protection conditions, but only if the object is expressly or impliedly the subject of the conditions; or
the person owns the object, or is acting with the owner’s agreement; or
the person’s possession of the object is necessary because of an emergency, including for example, a bushfire or other natural disaster.
For subsection (1) , it does not matter whether the circumstances of the person’s knowledge arose before the commencement of this section, or arise after the commencement, or arose partly before the commencement and arise partly after the commencement.
This section does not apply to Aboriginal human remains.
(sec.26-ssec.1) A person must not have in the person’s possession an object that is Aboriginal cultural heritage if the person knows or ought reasonably to know that the object is Aboriginal cultural heritage Maximum penalty— for an individual—1,000 penalty units; for a corporation—10,000 penalty units.
(sec.26-ssec.2) A person who has in the person’s possession an object that is Aboriginal cultural heritage does not commit an offence under subsection (1) if— the person is acting— under the authority of another provision of this Act that applies to the object; or under an approved cultural heritage management plan that applies to the object; or under a native title agreement or another agreement with an Aboriginal party, unless the object is expressly excluded from being subject to the agreement; or in compliance with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines; or in compliance with the cultural heritage duty of care; or in compliance with native title protection conditions, but only if the object is expressly or impliedly the subject of the conditions; or the person owns the object, or is acting with the owner’s agreement; or the person’s possession of the object is necessary because of an emergency, including for example, a bushfire or other natural disaster.
(sec.26-ssec.3) For subsection (1) , it does not matter whether the circumstances of the person’s knowledge arose before the commencement of this section, or arise after the commencement, or arose partly before the commencement and arise partly after the commencement.
(sec.26-ssec.4) This section does not apply to Aboriginal human remains.
(a) for an individual—1,000 penalty units;
(b) for a corporation—10,000 penalty units.
(a) the person is acting— (i) under the authority of another provision of this Act that applies to the object; or (ii) under an approved cultural heritage management plan that applies to the object; or (iii) under a native title agreement or another agreement with an Aboriginal party, unless the object is expressly excluded from being subject to the agreement; or (iv) in compliance with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines; or (v) in compliance with the cultural heritage duty of care; or (vi) in compliance with native title protection conditions, but only if the object is expressly or impliedly the subject of the conditions; or
(i) under the authority of another provision of this Act that applies to the object; or
(ii) under an approved cultural heritage management plan that applies to the object; or
(iii) under a native title agreement or another agreement with an Aboriginal party, unless the object is expressly excluded from being subject to the agreement; or
(iv) in compliance with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines; or
(v) in compliance with the cultural heritage duty of care; or
(vi) in compliance with native title protection conditions, but only if the object is expressly or impliedly the subject of the conditions; or
(b) the person owns the object, or is acting with the owner’s agreement; or
(c) the person’s possession of the object is necessary because of an emergency, including for example, a bushfire or other natural disaster.
(i) under the authority of another provision of this Act that applies to the object; or
(ii) under an approved cultural heritage management plan that applies to the object; or
(iii) under a native title agreement or another agreement with an Aboriginal party, unless the object is expressly excluded from being subject to the agreement; or
(iv) in compliance with cultural heritage duty of care guidelines; or
(v) in compliance with the cultural heritage duty of care; or
(vi) in compliance with native title protection conditions, but only if the object is expressly or impliedly the subject of the conditions; or
sec.27
Court may order costs of rehabilitation or restoration
sec.27 Court may order costs of rehabilitation or restoration
On a conviction of a person for an offence under this division involving the unlawful harming or possessing of Aboriginal cultural heritage, the court may, if considered appropriate, order the person to pay to the State or another appropriate entity an amount for or towards—
the cost of any repair or restoration of the Aboriginal cultural heritage needing to be carried out; and
the cost of any repair or restoration of anything else that is not itself the Aboriginal cultural heritage, but that is associated with the Aboriginal cultural heritage and also needs to be repaired or restored because of the offence.
In this section—
conviction includes a plea of guilty or a finding of guilt by a court, even though a conviction is not recorded.
(sec.27-ssec.1) On a conviction of a person for an offence under this division involving the unlawful harming or possessing of Aboriginal cultural heritage, the court may, if considered appropriate, order the person to pay to the State or another appropriate entity an amount for or towards— the cost of any repair or restoration of the Aboriginal cultural heritage needing to be carried out; and the cost of any repair or restoration of anything else that is not itself the Aboriginal cultural heritage, but that is associated with the Aboriginal cultural heritage and also needs to be repaired or restored because of the offence.
(sec.27-ssec.2) In this section— conviction includes a plea of guilty or a finding of guilt by a court, even though a conviction is not recorded.
(a) the cost of any repair or restoration of the Aboriginal cultural heritage needing to be carried out; and
(b) the cost of any repair or restoration of anything else that is not itself the Aboriginal cultural heritage, but that is associated with the Aboriginal cultural heritage and also needs to be repaired or restored because of the offence.
pt.3-div.2
Duty of care guidelines
Duty of care guidelines
sec.28
Cultural heritage duty of care guidelines
sec.28 Cultural heritage duty of care guidelines
The Minister may by gazette notice notify guidelines ( cultural heritage duty of care guidelines ) identifying reasonable and practicable measures for ensuring activities are managed to avoid or minimise harm to Aboriginal cultural heritage.
In formulating cultural heritage duty of care guidelines, the Minister may consult with the following—
Aboriginal groups;
industry groups;
local governments;
other persons the Minister considers appropriate.
(sec.28-ssec.1) The Minister may by gazette notice notify guidelines ( cultural heritage duty of care guidelines ) identifying reasonable and practicable measures for ensuring activities are managed to avoid or minimise harm to Aboriginal cultural heritage.
(sec.28-ssec.2) In formulating cultural heritage duty of care guidelines, the Minister may consult with the following— Aboriginal groups; industry groups; local governments; other persons the Minister considers appropriate.
(a) Aboriginal groups;
(b) industry groups;
(c) local governments;
(d) other persons the Minister considers appropriate.
pt.3-div.3
Information about cultural heritage
Information about cultural heritage
sec.29
Information protection provision
sec.29 Information protection provision
This section applies to a person who, under this Act, submits to the chief executive or the Minister a report or other document about Aboriginal cultural heritage matters.
The person must not include in the report or other document knowledge or information given to or otherwise acquired by the person if—
the person knows the knowledge or information is of a secret or sacred nature; and
the Aboriginal people in whose understanding the knowledge or information is of a secret or sacred nature have not agreed to its inclusion in the report or other document.
Maximum penalty—
for an individual—100 penalty units;
for a corporation—1,000 penalty units.
(sec.29-ssec.1) This section applies to a person who, under this Act, submits to the chief executive or the Minister a report or other document about Aboriginal cultural heritage matters.
(sec.29-ssec.2) The person must not include in the report or other document knowledge or information given to or otherwise acquired by the person if— the person knows the knowledge or information is of a secret or sacred nature; and the Aboriginal people in whose understanding the knowledge or information is of a secret or sacred nature have not agreed to its inclusion in the report or other document. Maximum penalty— for an individual—100 penalty units; for a corporation—1,000 penalty units.
(a) the person knows the knowledge or information is of a secret or sacred nature; and
(b) the Aboriginal people in whose understanding the knowledge or information is of a secret or sacred nature have not agreed to its inclusion in the report or other document.
(a) for an individual—100 penalty units;
(b) for a corporation—1,000 penalty units.
sec.30
Putting cultural heritage management plan into effect
sec.30 Putting cultural heritage management plan into effect
A person who is involved in putting an approved cultural heritage management plan into effect must take all reasonable steps to ensure the chief executive is advised about all Aboriginal cultural heritage revealed to exist because of any activity carried out under the plan.
Maximum penalty—
for an individual—100 penalty units;
for a corporation—1,000 penalty units.
Subsection (1) does not require the giving of advice to the chief executive if giving the advice would be a contravention of the information protection provision.
(sec.30-ssec.1) A person who is involved in putting an approved cultural heritage management plan into effect must take all reasonable steps to ensure the chief executive is advised about all Aboriginal cultural heritage revealed to exist because of any activity carried out under the plan. Maximum penalty— for an individual—100 penalty units; for a corporation—1,000 penalty units.
(sec.30-ssec.2) Subsection (1) does not require the giving of advice to the chief executive if giving the advice would be a contravention of the information protection provision.
(a) for an individual—100 penalty units;
(b) for a corporation—1,000 penalty units.
sec.31
Other activities
sec.31 Other activities
A person who is involved in carrying out an activity, other than an activity under an approved cultural heritage management plan, may advise the chief executive of Aboriginal cultural heritage revealed to exist because of the activity.
Subsection (1) does not authorise the giving of advice to the chief executive if giving the advice would be a contravention of the information protection provision.
(sec.31-ssec.1) A person who is involved in carrying out an activity, other than an activity under an approved cultural heritage management plan, may advise the chief executive of Aboriginal cultural heritage revealed to exist because of the activity.
(sec.31-ssec.2) Subsection (1) does not authorise the giving of advice to the chief executive if giving the advice would be a contravention of the information protection provision.
pt.3-div.4
Protection of cultural heritage under action of Minister
Protection of cultural heritage under action of Minister
sec.32
Stop orders
sec.32 Stop orders
This section applies if the Minister is satisfied there are reasonable grounds for concluding—
a person is carrying out or is about to carry out an activity; and
either or both of the following apply—
in carrying out the activity, the person is or will be harming Aboriginal cultural heritage;
the carrying out of the activity is having or will have a significant adverse impact on the cultural heritage value of Aboriginal cultural heritage.
The Minister may give the person a stop order for the activity.
The stop order must be given to the person—
by giving it to the person personally; or
if it is not reasonably practicable to give it to the person personally—by fixing it in a prominent position at the place where the activity is being carried out or is about to be carried out.
The stop order—
operates from when it is given to the person under subsection (3) ; and
unless it is revoked sooner, continues in force for 30 days from when it is given to the person, or for a shorter period stated in the order.
The Minister may give 1 further stop order of not more than 30 days under this section for the person’s activity.
A person must not knowingly contravene a stop order given to a person under this section.
Maximum penalty—17,000 penalty units.
The penalty amount mentioned in subsection (6) is the maximum penalty amount that may be imposed for an offence under the subsection, even if the offence is committed by a corporation.
A stop order under this section is ineffective in its application to an activity if the activity is the subject of an injunction granted in the exercise of the exclusive jurisdiction the Land Court has for cultural heritage matters under the Land Court Act 2000 , section 32H .
s 32 amd 2007 No. 39 s 41 sch
(sec.32-ssec.1) This section applies if the Minister is satisfied there are reasonable grounds for concluding— a person is carrying out or is about to carry out an activity; and either or both of the following apply— in carrying out the activity, the person is or will be harming Aboriginal cultural heritage; the carrying out of the activity is having or will have a significant adverse impact on the cultural heritage value of Aboriginal cultural heritage.
(sec.32-ssec.2) The Minister may give the person a stop order for the activity.
(sec.32-ssec.3) The stop order must be given to the person— by giving it to the person personally; or if it is not reasonably practicable to give it to the person personally—by fixing it in a prominent position at the place where the activity is being carried out or is about to be carried out.
(sec.32-ssec.4) The stop order— operates from when it is given to the person under subsection (3) ; and unless it is revoked sooner, continues in force for 30 days from when it is given to the person, or for a shorter period stated in the order.
(sec.32-ssec.5) The Minister may give 1 further stop order of not more than 30 days under this section for the person’s activity.
(sec.32-ssec.6) A person must not knowingly contravene a stop order given to a person under this section. Maximum penalty—17,000 penalty units.
(sec.32-ssec.7) The penalty amount mentioned in subsection (6) is the maximum penalty amount that may be imposed for an offence under the subsection, even if the offence is committed by a corporation.
(sec.32-ssec.8) A stop order under this section is ineffective in its application to an activity if the activity is the subject of an injunction granted in the exercise of the exclusive jurisdiction the Land Court has for cultural heritage matters under the Land Court Act 2000 , section 32H .
(a) a person is carrying out or is about to carry out an activity; and
(b) either or both of the following apply— (i) in carrying out the activity, the person is or will be harming Aboriginal cultural heritage; (ii) the carrying out of the activity is having or will have a significant adverse impact on the cultural heritage value of Aboriginal cultural heritage.
(i) in carrying out the activity, the person is or will be harming Aboriginal cultural heritage;
(ii) the carrying out of the activity is having or will have a significant adverse impact on the cultural heritage value of Aboriginal cultural heritage.
(i) in carrying out the activity, the person is or will be harming Aboriginal cultural heritage;
(ii) the carrying out of the activity is having or will have a significant adverse impact on the cultural heritage value of Aboriginal cultural heritage.
(a) by giving it to the person personally; or
(b) if it is not reasonably practicable to give it to the person personally—by fixing it in a prominent position at the place where the activity is being carried out or is about to be carried out.
(a) operates from when it is given to the person under subsection (3) ; and
(b) unless it is revoked sooner, continues in force for 30 days from when it is given to the person, or for a shorter period stated in the order.
sec.33
Particular steps to preserve cultural heritage
sec.33 Particular steps to preserve cultural heritage
The Minister may—
for the State, acquire by purchase or gift Aboriginal cultural heritage for the purpose of its preservation; and
cause structures to be erected, and other steps to be taken, that are necessary or desirable to preserve the Aboriginal cultural heritage.
(a) for the State, acquire by purchase or gift Aboriginal cultural heritage for the purpose of its preservation; and
(b) cause structures to be erected, and other steps to be taken, that are necessary or desirable to preserve the Aboriginal cultural heritage.
pt.4
Native title parties, Aboriginal parties and Aboriginal cultural heritage bodies
Native title parties, Aboriginal parties and Aboriginal cultural heritage bodies
sec.34
Native title party for an area
sec.34 Native title party for an area
Each of the following is a native title party for an area—
a registered native title claimant for the area;
a person who, at any time after the commencement of this section, was a registered native title claimant for the area, but only if—
the person’s claim has failed and—
the person’s claim was the last claim registered under the Register of Native Title Claims for the area; and
there is no other registered native title claimant for the area; and
there is not, and never has been, a registered native title holder for the area; or
the person has surrendered the person’s native title under an indigenous land use agreement registered on the Register of Indigenous Land Use Agreements; or
the person’s native title has been compulsorily acquired or has otherwise been extinguished;
a registered native title holder for the area;
a person who was a registered native title holder for the area, but only if—
the person has surrendered the person’s native title under an indigenous land use agreement registered on the Register of Indigenous Land Use Agreements; or
the person’s native title has been compulsorily acquired or has otherwise been extinguished.
If a person would be a native title party under subsection (1) (b) but the person is no longer alive, the native title party is instead taken to be the native title claim group who, under the Commonwealth Native Title Act , authorised the person to make the relevant native title determination application.
s 34 amd 2010 No. 12 s 4 ; 2018 No. 27 s 95
(sec.34-ssec.1) Each of the following is a native title party for an area— a registered native title claimant for the area; a person who, at any time after the commencement of this section, was a registered native title claimant for the area, but only if— the person’s claim has failed and— the person’s claim was the last claim registered under the Register of Native Title Claims for the area; and there is no other registered native title claimant for the area; and there is not, and never has been, a registered native title holder for the area; or the person has surrendered the person’s native title under an indigenous land use agreement registered on the Register of Indigenous Land Use Agreements; or the person’s native title has been compulsorily acquired or has otherwise been extinguished; a registered native title holder for the area; a person who was a registered native title holder for the area, but only if— the person has surrendered the person’s native title under an indigenous land use agreement registered on the Register of Indigenous Land Use Agreements; or the person’s native title has been compulsorily acquired or has otherwise been extinguished.
(sec.34-ssec.2) If a person would be a native title party under subsection (1) (b) but the person is no longer alive, the native title party is instead taken to be the native title claim group who, under the Commonwealth Native Title Act , authorised the person to make the relevant native title determination application.
(a) a registered native title claimant for the area;
(b) a person who, at any time after the commencement of this section, was a registered native title claimant for the area, but only if— (i) the person’s claim has failed and— (A) the person’s claim was the last claim registered under the Register of Native Title Claims for the area; and (B) there is no other registered native title claimant for the area; and (C) there is not, and never has been, a registered native title holder for the area; or (ii) the person has surrendered the person’s native title under an indigenous land use agreement registered on the Register of Indigenous Land Use Agreements; or (iii) the person’s native title has been compulsorily acquired or has otherwise been extinguished;
(i) the person’s claim has failed and— (A) the person’s claim was the last claim registered under the Register of Native Title Claims for the area; and (B) there is no other registered native title claimant for the area; and (C) there is not, and never has been, a registered native title holder for the area; or
(A) the person’s claim was the last claim registered under the Register of Native Title Claims for the area; and
(B) there is no other registered native title claimant for the area; and
(C) there is not, and never has been, a registered native title holder for the area; or
(ii) the person has surrendered the person’s native title under an indigenous land use agreement registered on the Register of Indigenous Land Use Agreements; or
(iii) the person’s native title has been compulsorily acquired or has otherwise been extinguished;
(c) a registered native title holder for the area;
(d) a person who was a registered native title holder for the area, but only if— (i) the person has surrendered the person’s native title under an indigenous land use agreement registered on the Register of Indigenous Land Use Agreements; or (ii) the person’s native title has been compulsorily acquired or has otherwise been extinguished.
(i) the person has surrendered the person’s native title under an indigenous land use agreement registered on the Register of Indigenous Land Use Agreements; or
(ii) the person’s native title has been compulsorily acquired or has otherwise been extinguished.
(i) the person’s claim has failed and— (A) the person’s claim was the last claim registered under the Register of Native Title Claims for the area; and (B) there is no other registered native title claimant for the area; and (C) there is not, and never has been, a registered native title holder for the area; or
(A) the person’s claim was the last claim registered under the Register of Native Title Claims for the area; and
(B) there is no other registered native title claimant for the area; and
(C) there is not, and never has been, a registered native title holder for the area; or
(ii) the person has surrendered the person’s native title under an indigenous land use agreement registered on the Register of Indigenous Land Use Agreements; or
(iii) the person’s native title has been compulsorily acquired or has otherwise been extinguished;
(A) the person’s claim was the last claim registered under the Register of Native Title Claims for the area; and
(B) there is no other registered native title claimant for the area; and
(C) there is not, and never has been, a registered native title holder for the area; or
(i) the person has surrendered the person’s native title under an indigenous land use agreement registered on the Register of Indigenous Land Use Agreements; or
(ii) the person’s native title has been compulsorily acquired or has otherwise been extinguished.
sec.35
Aboriginal party for an area
sec.35 Aboriginal party for an area
A native title party for an area is an Aboriginal party for the area.
Subsection (3) applies to a native title party for an area who—
is or was a registered native title claimant; or
is the native title claim group who authorised a person who is no longer alive, but who was a registered native title claimant, to make a native title determination application.
The native title party is an Aboriginal party for the whole area included within the outer boundaries of the area in relation to which the application was made under the Commonwealth Native Title Act for a determination of native title, regardless of the nature and extent of the claimant’s claims in relation to any particular part of the whole area.
Subsection (5) applies to a native title party for an area who is or was a registered native title holder the subject of a determination of native title under the Commonwealth Native Title Act .
The native title party is an Aboriginal party for the whole area included within the outer boundaries of the area in relation to which the application for the determination was made, regardless of the extent to which native title was found to exist in relation to any particular part of the whole area.
However, a native title party to whom subsection (5) applies is not an Aboriginal party for a part of the area if—
native title was not found to exist in relation to the part; and
there is a registered native title claimant for the part.
If there is no native title party for an area, a person is an Aboriginal party for the area if—
the person is an Aboriginal person with particular knowledge about traditions, observances, customs or beliefs associated with the area; and
the person—
has responsibility under Aboriginal tradition for some or all of the area, or for significant Aboriginal objects located or originating in the area; or
is a member of a family or clan group that is recognised as having responsibility under Aboriginal tradition for some or all of the area, or for significant Aboriginal objects located or originating in the area.
(sec.35-ssec.1) A native title party for an area is an Aboriginal party for the area.
(sec.35-ssec.2) Subsection (3) applies to a native title party for an area who— is or was a registered native title claimant; or is the native title claim group who authorised a person who is no longer alive, but who was a registered native title claimant, to make a native title determination application.
(sec.35-ssec.3) The native title party is an Aboriginal party for the whole area included within the outer boundaries of the area in relation to which the application was made under the Commonwealth Native Title Act for a determination of native title, regardless of the nature and extent of the claimant’s claims in relation to any particular part of the whole area.
(sec.35-ssec.4) Subsection (5) applies to a native title party for an area who is or was a registered native title holder the subject of a determination of native title under the Commonwealth Native Title Act .
(sec.35-ssec.5) The native title party is an Aboriginal party for the whole area included within the outer boundaries of the area in relation to which the application for the determination was made, regardless of the extent to which native title was found to exist in relation to any particular part of the whole area.
(sec.35-ssec.6) However, a native title party to whom subsection (5) applies is not an Aboriginal party for a part of the area if— native title was not found to exist in relation to the part; and there is a registered native title claimant for the part.
(sec.35-ssec.7) If there is no native title party for an area, a person is an Aboriginal party for the area if— the person is an Aboriginal person with particular knowledge about traditions, observances, customs or beliefs associated with the area; and the person— has responsibility under Aboriginal tradition for some or all of the area, or for significant Aboriginal objects located or originating in the area; or is a member of a family or clan group that is recognised as having responsibility under Aboriginal tradition for some or all of the area, or for significant Aboriginal objects located or originating in the area.
(a) is or was a registered native title claimant; or
(b) is the native title claim group who authorised a person who is no longer alive, but who was a registered native title claimant, to make a native title determination application.
(a) native title was not found to exist in relation to the part; and
(b) there is a registered native title claimant for the part.
(a) the person is an Aboriginal person with particular knowledge about traditions, observances, customs or beliefs associated with the area; and
(b) the person— (i) has responsibility under Aboriginal tradition for some or all of the area, or for significant Aboriginal objects located or originating in the area; or (ii) is a member of a family or clan group that is recognised as having responsibility under Aboriginal tradition for some or all of the area, or for significant Aboriginal objects located or originating in the area.
(i) has responsibility under Aboriginal tradition for some or all of the area, or for significant Aboriginal objects located or originating in the area; or
(ii) is a member of a family or clan group that is recognised as having responsibility under Aboriginal tradition for some or all of the area, or for significant Aboriginal objects located or originating in the area.
(i) has responsibility under Aboriginal tradition for some or all of the area, or for significant Aboriginal objects located or originating in the area; or
(ii) is a member of a family or clan group that is recognised as having responsibility under Aboriginal tradition for some or all of the area, or for significant Aboriginal objects located or originating in the area.
sec.36
Registration as Aboriginal cultural heritage body
sec.36 Registration as Aboriginal cultural heritage body
The Minister may, on the application of a corporation, register the corporation as an Aboriginal cultural heritage body for an area.
The Minister must not register a corporation as an Aboriginal cultural heritage body for an area if there is currently another corporation registered as an Aboriginal cultural heritage body for the area or any part of the area.
However, the Minister may register a corporation (the new corporation ) as an Aboriginal cultural heritage body for an area even though there is currently another corporation (the registered corporation ) registered as an Aboriginal cultural heritage body for the area or any part of the area if—
the new corporation’s registration is only for the purposes of a particular project; and
the registered corporation has given written agreement to the new corporation’s registration for the purposes of the project; and
the registration provides that the registration is effective only until the project finishes.
The Minister may register a corporation as an Aboriginal cultural heritage body for an area only if the Minister is satisfied that—
the corporation—
is an appropriate body to identify Aboriginal parties for the area; and
has the capacity to identify Aboriginal parties for the area; and
either—
Aboriginal parties for the area that are native title parties for the area agree the corporation should be registered; or
if there is no Aboriginal party for the area that is a native title party for the area—there is substantial agreement among the Aboriginal parties for the area that the corporation should be registered.
a registered native title body corporate, a representative body that is a corporation, an Aboriginal body incorporated for furthering the interests of Aboriginal people in relation to land or cultural matters
In deciding whether to register a corporation as the Aboriginal cultural heritage body for an area, the Minister may do any of the following—
consult with Aboriginal parties for the area or parts of the area;
advertise for submissions about the proposed registration of the corporation;
anything else the Minister considers necessary to inform himself or herself.
The Minister may cancel the registration of a corporation as the Aboriginal cultural heritage body for an area if the Minister is no longer satisfied about the matters mentioned in subsection (4) in relation to the corporation.
In this section—
register , a corporation, means record the corporation in the register.
(sec.36-ssec.1) The Minister may, on the application of a corporation, register the corporation as an Aboriginal cultural heritage body for an area.
(sec.36-ssec.2) The Minister must not register a corporation as an Aboriginal cultural heritage body for an area if there is currently another corporation registered as an Aboriginal cultural heritage body for the area or any part of the area.
(sec.36-ssec.3) However, the Minister may register a corporation (the new corporation ) as an Aboriginal cultural heritage body for an area even though there is currently another corporation (the registered corporation ) registered as an Aboriginal cultural heritage body for the area or any part of the area if— the new corporation’s registration is only for the purposes of a particular project; and the registered corporation has given written agreement to the new corporation’s registration for the purposes of the project; and the registration provides that the registration is effective only until the project finishes.
(sec.36-ssec.4) The Minister may register a corporation as an Aboriginal cultural heritage body for an area only if the Minister is satisfied that— the corporation— is an appropriate body to identify Aboriginal parties for the area; and has the capacity to identify Aboriginal parties for the area; and either— Aboriginal parties for the area that are native title parties for the area agree the corporation should be registered; or if there is no Aboriginal party for the area that is a native title party for the area—there is substantial agreement among the Aboriginal parties for the area that the corporation should be registered. a registered native title body corporate, a representative body that is a corporation, an Aboriginal body incorporated for furthering the interests of Aboriginal people in relation to land or cultural matters
(sec.36-ssec.5) In deciding whether to register a corporation as the Aboriginal cultural heritage body for an area, the Minister may do any of the following— consult with Aboriginal parties for the area or parts of the area; advertise for submissions about the proposed registration of the corporation; anything else the Minister considers necessary to inform himself or herself.
(sec.36-ssec.6) The Minister may cancel the registration of a corporation as the Aboriginal cultural heritage body for an area if the Minister is no longer satisfied about the matters mentioned in subsection (4) in relation to the corporation.
(sec.36-ssec.7) In this section— register , a corporation, means record the corporation in the register.
(a) the new corporation’s registration is only for the purposes of a particular project; and
(b) the registered corporation has given written agreement to the new corporation’s registration for the purposes of the project; and
(c) the registration provides that the registration is effective only until the project finishes.
(a) the corporation— (i) is an appropriate body to identify Aboriginal parties for the area; and (ii) has the capacity to identify Aboriginal parties for the area; and
(i) is an appropriate body to identify Aboriginal parties for the area; and
(ii) has the capacity to identify Aboriginal parties for the area; and
(b) either— (i) Aboriginal parties for the area that are native title parties for the area agree the corporation should be registered; or (ii) if there is no Aboriginal party for the area that is a native title party for the area—there is substantial agreement among the Aboriginal parties for the area that the corporation should be registered. Examples of corporations that may be appropriate to be registered— a registered native title body corporate, a representative body that is a corporation, an Aboriginal body incorporated for furthering the interests of Aboriginal people in relation to land or cultural matters
(i) Aboriginal parties for the area that are native title parties for the area agree the corporation should be registered; or
(ii) if there is no Aboriginal party for the area that is a native title party for the area—there is substantial agreement among the Aboriginal parties for the area that the corporation should be registered.
(i) is an appropriate body to identify Aboriginal parties for the area; and
(ii) has the capacity to identify Aboriginal parties for the area; and
(i) Aboriginal parties for the area that are native title parties for the area agree the corporation should be registered; or
(ii) if there is no Aboriginal party for the area that is a native title party for the area—there is substantial agreement among the Aboriginal parties for the area that the corporation should be registered.
(a) consult with Aboriginal parties for the area or parts of the area;
(b) advertise for submissions about the proposed registration of the corporation;
(c) anything else the Minister considers necessary to inform himself or herself.
sec.37
Function of Aboriginal cultural heritage body
sec.37 Function of Aboriginal cultural heritage body
The function of an Aboriginal cultural heritage body for an area is to identify, for the benefit of a person who needs to know under this Act, the Aboriginal parties for the area or for a particular part of the area.
The Minister may give an Aboriginal cultural heritage body for an area the financial or other help the body needs to carry out its function.
(sec.37-ssec.1) The function of an Aboriginal cultural heritage body for an area is to identify, for the benefit of a person who needs to know under this Act, the Aboriginal parties for the area or for a particular part of the area.
(sec.37-ssec.2) The Minister may give an Aboriginal cultural heritage body for an area the financial or other help the body needs to carry out its function.
pt.5
Collection and management of Aboriginal cultural heritage information
Collection and management of Aboriginal cultural heritage information
pt.5-div.1
Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Database
Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Database
sec.38
Establishment of database
sec.38 Establishment of database
The chief executive must establish and keep the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Database.
The chief executive may keep the database in the form or forms the chief executive considers to be the most appropriate in the circumstances for achieving the purpose of establishing the database.
(sec.38-ssec.1) The chief executive must establish and keep the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Database.
(sec.38-ssec.2) The chief executive may keep the database in the form or forms the chief executive considers to be the most appropriate in the circumstances for achieving the purpose of establishing the database.
sec.39
Purpose of establishing database
sec.39 Purpose of establishing database
The purpose of establishing the database is to assemble, in a central and accessible location, information about Aboriginal cultural heritage.
The database is intended to be a research and planning tool to help Aboriginal parties, researchers and other persons in their consideration of the Aboriginal cultural heritage values of particular areas.
The placing of information on the database is not intended to be conclusive about whether the information is up-to-date, comprehensive or otherwise accurate.
(sec.39-ssec.1) The purpose of establishing the database is to assemble, in a central and accessible location, information about Aboriginal cultural heritage.
(sec.39-ssec.2) The database is intended to be a research and planning tool to help Aboriginal parties, researchers and other persons in their consideration of the Aboriginal cultural heritage values of particular areas.
(sec.39-ssec.3) The placing of information on the database is not intended to be conclusive about whether the information is up-to-date, comprehensive or otherwise accurate.
sec.40
Placing information on database
sec.40 Placing information on database
The chief executive may place information on the database to the extent the chief executive considers appropriate, having regard especially to the consistency of the information with existing anthropological, biogeographical, historical and archaeological information.
Information the chief executive places on the database may be either information another person asks the chief executive to place on the database or information the chief executive already holds.
(sec.40-ssec.1) The chief executive may place information on the database to the extent the chief executive considers appropriate, having regard especially to the consistency of the information with existing anthropological, biogeographical, historical and archaeological information.
(sec.40-ssec.2) Information the chief executive places on the database may be either information another person asks the chief executive to place on the database or information the chief executive already holds.
sec.41
Taking information off database
sec.41 Taking information off database
The chief executive may take information off the database if the chief executive is satisfied the information has been recorded in error.
However, before acting under subsection (1) to take information about Aboriginal cultural heritage for a particular area off the database, the chief executive must, to the extent it is reasonably practicable to do so, consult with any Aboriginal party for the area.
(sec.41-ssec.1) The chief executive may take information off the database if the chief executive is satisfied the information has been recorded in error.
(sec.41-ssec.2) However, before acting under subsection (1) to take information about Aboriginal cultural heritage for a particular area off the database, the chief executive must, to the extent it is reasonably practicable to do so, consult with any Aboriginal party for the area.
sec.42
Availability of database to public generally
sec.42 Availability of database to public generally
The chief executive must not give access to the database generally.
sec.43
Availability of database to Aboriginal party
sec.43 Availability of database to Aboriginal party
This section applies if an Aboriginal party for an area seeks information from the database.
The chief executive must give the Aboriginal party information from the database to the extent that, in the chief executive’s opinion, the information on the database relates to the area.
(sec.43-ssec.1) This section applies if an Aboriginal party for an area seeks information from the database.
(sec.43-ssec.2) The chief executive must give the Aboriginal party information from the database to the extent that, in the chief executive’s opinion, the information on the database relates to the area.
sec.44
Availability of database for cultural heritage duty of care purposes
sec.44 Availability of database for cultural heritage duty of care purposes
This section applies if a person carrying out an activity, including for example a land user, seeks information from the database.
The chief executive must give the person information from the database if, in the chief executive’s opinion, the person has a particular need to be aware of the information for satisfying the person’s cultural heritage duty of care.
However, the person does not necessarily comply with the person’s cultural heritage duty of care only because the person has consulted the database.
If information is to be given to the person under subsection (2) , the information may be given to a nominee or professional advisor acting for the person.
(sec.44-ssec.1) This section applies if a person carrying out an activity, including for example a land user, seeks information from the database.
(sec.44-ssec.2) The chief executive must give the person information from the database if, in the chief executive’s opinion, the person has a particular need to be aware of the information for satisfying the person’s cultural heritage duty of care.
(sec.44-ssec.3) However, the person does not necessarily comply with the person’s cultural heritage duty of care only because the person has consulted the database.
(sec.44-ssec.4) If information is to be given to the person under subsection (2) , the information may be given to a nominee or professional advisor acting for the person.
sec.45
Availability of database to researcher
sec.45 Availability of database to researcher
This section applies if a researcher into Aboriginal cultural heritage seeks information from the database.
The chief executive may give the researcher information from the database to the extent that, in the chief executive’s opinion, the information on the database relates to the research.
(sec.45-ssec.1) This section applies if a researcher into Aboriginal cultural heritage seeks information from the database.
(sec.45-ssec.2) The chief executive may give the researcher information from the database to the extent that, in the chief executive’s opinion, the information on the database relates to the research.
pt.5-div.2
Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Register
Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Register
sec.46
Establishment of register
sec.46 Establishment of register
The chief executive must establish and keep the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Register.
The chief executive may keep the register in the form or forms the chief executive considers to be the most appropriate in the circumstances for—
achieving the purpose of establishing the register; and
ensuring the register otherwise complies with the requirements of this division.
(sec.46-ssec.1) The chief executive must establish and keep the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Register.
(sec.46-ssec.2) The chief executive may keep the register in the form or forms the chief executive considers to be the most appropriate in the circumstances for— achieving the purpose of establishing the register; and ensuring the register otherwise complies with the requirements of this division.
(a) achieving the purpose of establishing the register; and
(b) ensuring the register otherwise complies with the requirements of this division.
sec.47
Purpose of establishing register
sec.47 Purpose of establishing register
The purpose of establishing the register is to assemble in a central and accessible location—
information contained in cultural heritage studies; and
information about whether particular areas have been the subject of cultural heritage management plans; and
information about Aboriginal cultural heritage bodies; and
other information necessary to help the consideration of Aboriginal cultural heritage, including for example addresses for service of Aboriginal parties.
The register is intended to be—
a depository for information for consideration for land use and land use planning, including, for example, for local government planning schemes and for regional planning strategies; and
a research and planning tool to help people in their consideration of the Aboriginal cultural heritage values of particular objects and areas.
(sec.47-ssec.1) The purpose of establishing the register is to assemble in a central and accessible location— information contained in cultural heritage studies; and information about whether particular areas have been the subject of cultural heritage management plans; and information about Aboriginal cultural heritage bodies; and other information necessary to help the consideration of Aboriginal cultural heritage, including for example addresses for service of Aboriginal parties.
(sec.47-ssec.2) The register is intended to be— a depository for information for consideration for land use and land use planning, including, for example, for local government planning schemes and for regional planning strategies; and a research and planning tool to help people in their consideration of the Aboriginal cultural heritage values of particular objects and areas.
(a) information contained in cultural heritage studies; and
(b) information about whether particular areas have been the subject of cultural heritage management plans; and
(c) information about Aboriginal cultural heritage bodies; and
(d) other information necessary to help the consideration of Aboriginal cultural heritage, including for example addresses for service of Aboriginal parties.
(a) a depository for information for consideration for land use and land use planning, including, for example, for local government planning schemes and for regional planning strategies; and
(b) a research and planning tool to help people in their consideration of the Aboriginal cultural heritage values of particular objects and areas.
sec.48
Recording information from cultural heritage study
sec.48 Recording information from cultural heritage study
This section applies if, under part 6 , the chief executive or Minister records in the register the findings of a cultural heritage study.
The chief executive or Minister must record—
a description of the cultural heritage study adequate to distinguish it from other cultural heritage studies; and
a description of the study area, including, if necessary for accurately locating the study area, a plan of the area and a detailed description of its boundaries; and
a description of all Aboriginal cultural heritage that has been identified in the study area and a description of its location; and
in general terms, the reasons anything identified as Aboriginal cultural heritage has been so identified, including, if appropriate, whether it relates to men’s or women’s business; and
if the study makes recommendations for the management of Aboriginal cultural heritage identified in the study—the recommendations; and
for each area or object assessed as a significant Aboriginal area or significant Aboriginal object—the name of each Aboriginal party that assessed the area or object as a significant Aboriginal area or significant Aboriginal object; and
the name and contact details of each endorsed party for the study; and
the name of each endorsed party for the study who did not take part in the carrying out of the study; and
the name and contact details of each Aboriginal cultural heritage body for the study area; and
the name and contact details of each cultural heritage assessor for the study; and
when the study was completed.
(sec.48-ssec.1) This section applies if, under part 6 , the chief executive or Minister records in the register the findings of a cultural heritage study.
(sec.48-ssec.2) The chief executive or Minister must record— a description of the cultural heritage study adequate to distinguish it from other cultural heritage studies; and a description of the study area, including, if necessary for accurately locating the study area, a plan of the area and a detailed description of its boundaries; and a description of all Aboriginal cultural heritage that has been identified in the study area and a description of its location; and in general terms, the reasons anything identified as Aboriginal cultural heritage has been so identified, including, if appropriate, whether it relates to men’s or women’s business; and if the study makes recommendations for the management of Aboriginal cultural heritage identified in the study—the recommendations; and for each area or object assessed as a significant Aboriginal area or significant Aboriginal object—the name of each Aboriginal party that assessed the area or object as a significant Aboriginal area or significant Aboriginal object; and the name and contact details of each endorsed party for the study; and the name of each endorsed party for the study who did not take part in the carrying out of the study; and the name and contact details of each Aboriginal cultural heritage body for the study area; and the name and contact details of each cultural heritage assessor for the study; and when the study was completed.
(a) a description of the cultural heritage study adequate to distinguish it from other cultural heritage studies; and
(b) a description of the study area, including, if necessary for accurately locating the study area, a plan of the area and a detailed description of its boundaries; and
(c) a description of all Aboriginal cultural heritage that has been identified in the study area and a description of its location; and
(d) in general terms, the reasons anything identified as Aboriginal cultural heritage has been so identified, including, if appropriate, whether it relates to men’s or women’s business; and
(e) if the study makes recommendations for the management of Aboriginal cultural heritage identified in the study—the recommendations; and
(f) for each area or object assessed as a significant Aboriginal area or significant Aboriginal object—the name of each Aboriginal party that assessed the area or object as a significant Aboriginal area or significant Aboriginal object; and
(g) the name and contact details of each endorsed party for the study; and
(h) the name of each endorsed party for the study who did not take part in the carrying out of the study; and
(i) the name and contact details of each Aboriginal cultural heritage body for the study area; and
(j) the name and contact details of each cultural heritage assessor for the study; and
(k) when the study was completed.
sec.49
Information about cultural heritage management plans
sec.49 Information about cultural heritage management plans
The chief executive must record in the register identifying details for each cultural heritage management plan approved, or in the process of being developed, under this Act.
The chief executive must arrange the register in a way giving the persons searching the register reasonable access to information about—
whether any particular area of the State is the subject of—
an approved cultural heritage management plan; or
a cultural heritage management plan in the process of being developed under this Act; and
the contact details for the sponsor and endorsed parties for each approved plan and plan being developed.
(sec.49-ssec.1) The chief executive must record in the register identifying details for each cultural heritage management plan approved, or in the process of being developed, under this Act.
(sec.49-ssec.2) The chief executive must arrange the register in a way giving the persons searching the register reasonable access to information about— whether any particular area of the State is the subject of— an approved cultural heritage management plan; or a cultural heritage management plan in the process of being developed under this Act; and the contact details for the sponsor and endorsed parties for each approved plan and plan being developed.
(a) whether any particular area of the State is the subject of— (i) an approved cultural heritage management plan; or (ii) a cultural heritage management plan in the process of being developed under this Act; and
(i) an approved cultural heritage management plan; or
(ii) a cultural heritage management plan in the process of being developed under this Act; and
(b) the contact details for the sponsor and endorsed parties for each approved plan and plan being developed.
(i) an approved cultural heritage management plan; or
(ii) a cultural heritage management plan in the process of being developed under this Act; and
sec.50
Keeping register up-to-date
sec.50 Keeping register up-to-date
The Minister may add information to, or take information off, the register if the Minister is satisfied the adding or taking off is a necessary adjustment for keeping the register up-to-date.
However, before acting under subsection (1) to take information off the register, the Minister must, to the extent it is reasonably practicable to do so, consult with any Aboriginal party for the area to which the information relates.
Information added to the register under subsection (1) is taken to be information recorded in the register.
Information taken off the register under subsection (1) is taken to be information no longer recorded in the register.
(sec.50-ssec.1) The Minister may add information to, or take information off, the register if the Minister is satisfied the adding or taking off is a necessary adjustment for keeping the register up-to-date.
(sec.50-ssec.2) However, before acting under subsection (1) to take information off the register, the Minister must, to the extent it is reasonably practicable to do so, consult with any Aboriginal party for the area to which the information relates.
(sec.50-ssec.3) Information added to the register under subsection (1) is taken to be information recorded in the register.
(sec.50-ssec.4) Information taken off the register under subsection (1) is taken to be information no longer recorded in the register.
sec.51
Availability of register to public generally
sec.51 Availability of register to public generally
The chief executive must give access to the register generally.
The chief executive may require a person seeking to obtain information from the register to pay the fee prescribed under a regulation.
(sec.51-ssec.1) The chief executive must give access to the register generally.
(sec.51-ssec.2) The chief executive may require a person seeking to obtain information from the register to pay the fee prescribed under a regulation.
pt.6
Cultural heritage studies
Cultural heritage studies
pt.6-div.1
Introduction
Introduction
sec.52
Requirements for carrying out cultural heritage study and recording findings
sec.52 Requirements for carrying out cultural heritage study and recording findings
Divisions 2 to 6 state the requirements for carrying out a cultural heritage study and for having its findings recorded in the register.
sec.53
Roles and responsibilities for carrying out cultural heritage study
sec.53 Roles and responsibilities for carrying out cultural heritage study
Any person, including the Minister, may be the sponsor for a cultural heritage study.
However—
Aboriginal parties are responsible for assessing the level of significance of areas and objects included in the study area that are or appear to be significant Aboriginal areas and significant Aboriginal objects; and
if the findings of a cultural heritage study are to be included in the register, the study must be carried out, and its findings put in written form, in the way this part requires.
(sec.53-ssec.1) Any person, including the Minister, may be the sponsor for a cultural heritage study.
(sec.53-ssec.2) However— Aboriginal parties are responsible for assessing the level of significance of areas and objects included in the study area that are or appear to be significant Aboriginal areas and significant Aboriginal objects; and if the findings of a cultural heritage study are to be included in the register, the study must be carried out, and its findings put in written form, in the way this part requires.
(a) Aboriginal parties are responsible for assessing the level of significance of areas and objects included in the study area that are or appear to be significant Aboriginal areas and significant Aboriginal objects; and
(b) if the findings of a cultural heritage study are to be included in the register, the study must be carried out, and its findings put in written form, in the way this part requires.
sec.54
Cultural heritage study guidelines
sec.54 Cultural heritage study guidelines
The Minister may by gazette notice notify guidelines to help people in choosing suitable methodologies for carrying out cultural heritage studies.
However, a failure to conform to the guidelines is not a ground for refusing to record a cultural heritage study’s findings in the register.
Before notifying the guidelines, the Minister may consult with the following—
Aboriginal groups;
industry groups;
local governments;
other persons the Minister considers appropriate.
(sec.54-ssec.1) The Minister may by gazette notice notify guidelines to help people in choosing suitable methodologies for carrying out cultural heritage studies.
(sec.54-ssec.2) However, a failure to conform to the guidelines is not a ground for refusing to record a cultural heritage study’s findings in the register.
(sec.54-ssec.3) Before notifying the guidelines, the Minister may consult with the following— Aboriginal groups; industry groups; local governments; other persons the Minister considers appropriate.
(a) Aboriginal groups;
(b) industry groups;
(c) local governments;
(d) other persons the Minister considers appropriate.
pt.6-div.2
Preparing to carry out cultural heritage study
Preparing to carry out cultural heritage study
sec.55
Reference to part of study area may be taken to include reference to whole
sec.55 Reference to part of study area may be taken to include reference to whole
For this division, a reference relating to a part of a study area may, if it is convenient to do so, be taken to include a reference to the whole of the study area.
sec.56
Giving of written notice (proposed study)
sec.56 Giving of written notice (proposed study)
The sponsor for a cultural heritage study must give a written notice ( written notice (proposed study) ) to—
the chief executive; and
each person who is an owner or occupier of a part of the study area; and
if, for a part of the study area, there is no Aboriginal cultural heritage body—each Aboriginal party that is a native title party for the part of the study area; and
each entity that is an Aboriginal cultural heritage body for a part of the study area; and
if, for a part of the study area, there is no Aboriginal cultural heritage body and there is also no Aboriginal party that is a native title party—each entity that is a representative body for the part of the study area; and
each local government whose local government area includes a part of the study area.
The written notice (proposed study) must, to the greatest practicable extent, be given simultaneously to each person to whom it is required to be given.
If, under subsection (1) (c) , the written notice is required to be given to a native title party for a part of the study area, the written notice may be sent to the address for service entered for the party in—
the register; or
if no address for service is entered in the register, but an address for service is entered in the National Native Title Register or the Register of Native Title Claims—the National Native Title Register or the Register of Native Title Claims.
(sec.56-ssec.1) The sponsor for a cultural heritage study must give a written notice ( written notice (proposed study) ) to— the chief executive; and each person who is an owner or occupier of a part of the study area; and if, for a part of the study area, there is no Aboriginal cultural heritage body—each Aboriginal party that is a native title party for the part of the study area; and each entity that is an Aboriginal cultural heritage body for a part of the study area; and if, for a part of the study area, there is no Aboriginal cultural heritage body and there is also no Aboriginal party that is a native title party—each entity that is a representative body for the part of the study area; and each local government whose local government area includes a part of the study area.
(sec.56-ssec.2) The written notice (proposed study) must, to the greatest practicable extent, be given simultaneously to each person to whom it is required to be given.
(sec.56-ssec.3) If, under subsection (1) (c) , the written notice is required to be given to a native title party for a part of the study area, the written notice may be sent to the address for service entered for the party in— the register; or if no address for service is entered in the register, but an address for service is entered in the National Native Title Register or the Register of Native Title Claims—the National Native Title Register or the Register of Native Title Claims.
(a) the chief executive; and
(b) each person who is an owner or occupier of a part of the study area; and
(c) if, for a part of the study area, there is no Aboriginal cultural heritage body—each Aboriginal party that is a native title party for the part of the study area; and
(d) each entity that is an Aboriginal cultural heritage body for a part of the study area; and
(e) if, for a part of the study area, there is no Aboriginal cultural heritage body and there is also no Aboriginal party that is a native title party—each entity that is a representative body for the part of the study area; and
(f) each local government whose local government area includes a part of the study area.
(a) the register; or
(b) if no address for service is entered in the register, but an address for service is entered in the National Native Title Register or the Register of Native Title Claims—the National Native Title Register or the Register of Native Title Claims.
sec.57
Basic information requirements for written notice (proposed study)
sec.57 Basic information requirements for written notice (proposed study)
The written notice (proposed study) must comply with the following requirements (the basic information requirements for the notice)—
it must advise the sponsor’s name and contact details, including the sponsor’s address for service;
it must advise that the sponsor intends to carry out the cultural heritage study;
it must describe the study area for the study and identify its location, including, to the extent appropriate and practicable in the circumstances, by describing the study area’s location in relation to the nearest town, using bearings and approximate distances.
(a) it must advise the sponsor’s name and contact details, including the sponsor’s address for service;
(b) it must advise that the sponsor intends to carry out the cultural heritage study;
(c) it must describe the study area for the study and identify its location, including, to the extent appropriate and practicable in the circumstances, by describing the study area’s location in relation to the nearest town, using bearings and approximate distances.
sec.58
Additional requirements for notice to Aboriginal cultural heritage body
sec.58 Additional requirements for notice to Aboriginal cultural heritage body
If the written notice (proposed study) is given to an Aboriginal cultural heritage body, the notice must, as well as complying with the basic information requirements for the notice—
advise the body that if it wishes to identify an Aboriginal party to take part in the cultural heritage study, it must give a written notice to the sponsor identifying the party and giving the party’s contact details; and
state the notice day (proposed study) for the study, and advise the body of the time by which the sponsor must be given the written notice identifying an Aboriginal party to take part in the cultural heritage study; and
advise the body that an Aboriginal party identified by the body might not be endorsed to take part in the study if the body does not give the sponsor the written notice within the required time.
For subsection (1) (b) , the time the sponsor advises as being the time by which the sponsor must be given the written notice identifying an Aboriginal party to take part in the cultural heritage study must be—
the end of 30 days after the notice day (proposed study) for the study; or
a later time decided by the sponsor.
(sec.58-ssec.1) If the written notice (proposed study) is given to an Aboriginal cultural heritage body, the notice must, as well as complying with the basic information requirements for the notice— advise the body that if it wishes to identify an Aboriginal party to take part in the cultural heritage study, it must give a written notice to the sponsor identifying the party and giving the party’s contact details; and state the notice day (proposed study) for the study, and advise the body of the time by which the sponsor must be given the written notice identifying an Aboriginal party to take part in the cultural heritage study; and advise the body that an Aboriginal party identified by the body might not be endorsed to take part in the study if the body does not give the sponsor the written notice within the required time.
(sec.58-ssec.2) For subsection (1) (b) , the time the sponsor advises as being the time by which the sponsor must be given the written notice identifying an Aboriginal party to take part in the cultural heritage study must be— the end of 30 days after the notice day (proposed study) for the study; or a later time decided by the sponsor.
(a) advise the body that if it wishes to identify an Aboriginal party to take part in the cultural heritage study, it must give a written notice to the sponsor identifying the party and giving the party’s contact details; and
(b) state the notice day (proposed study) for the study, and advise the body of the time by which the sponsor must be given the written notice identifying an Aboriginal party to take part in the cultural heritage study; and
(c) advise the body that an Aboriginal party identified by the body might not be endorsed to take part in the study if the body does not give the sponsor the written notice within the required time.
(a) the end of 30 days after the notice day (proposed study) for the study; or
(b) a later time decided by the sponsor.
sec.59
Additional requirements for notice to Aboriginal party
sec.59 Additional requirements for notice to Aboriginal party
If the written notice (proposed study) is given to an Aboriginal party, the notice must, as well as complying with the basic information requirements for the notice—
advise the party that if it wishes to take part in the cultural heritage study, it must give a written notice to the sponsor that the party wishes to take part in the study; and
state the notice day (proposed study) for the study, and advise the party of the time by which the sponsor must be given the written notice that the party wishes to take part in the study; and
advise the party that it might not be endorsed to take part in the study if it does not give the sponsor the written notice within the required time.
For subsection (1) (b) , the time the sponsor advises as being the time by which the sponsor must be given the written notice that the party wishes to take part in the study must be—
the end of 30 days after the notice day (proposed study) for the study; or
a later time decided by the sponsor.
(sec.59-ssec.1) If the written notice (proposed study) is given to an Aboriginal party, the notice must, as well as complying with the basic information requirements for the notice— advise the party that if it wishes to take part in the cultural heritage study, it must give a written notice to the sponsor that the party wishes to take part in the study; and state the notice day (proposed study) for the study, and advise the party of the time by which the sponsor must be given the written notice that the party wishes to take part in the study; and advise the party that it might not be endorsed to take part in the study if it does not give the sponsor the written notice within the required time.
(sec.59-ssec.2) For subsection (1) (b) , the time the sponsor advises as being the time by which the sponsor must be given the written notice that the party wishes to take part in the study must be— the end of 30 days after the notice day (proposed study) for the study; or a later time decided by the sponsor.
(a) advise the party that if it wishes to take part in the cultural heritage study, it must give a written notice to the sponsor that the party wishes to take part in the study; and
(b) state the notice day (proposed study) for the study, and advise the party of the time by which the sponsor must be given the written notice that the party wishes to take part in the study; and
(c) advise the party that it might not be endorsed to take part in the study if it does not give the sponsor the written notice within the required time.
(a) the end of 30 days after the notice day (proposed study) for the study; or
(b) a later time decided by the sponsor.
sec.60
Additional requirements for notice to representative body
sec.60 Additional requirements for notice to representative body
If the written notice (proposed study) is given to a representative body, the notice must, as well as complying with the basic information requirements for the notice, draw the attention of the representative body to the public notice (proposed study) published or to be published under this division.
sec.61
Giving of public notice (proposed study)
sec.61 Giving of public notice (proposed study)
This section applies if, for a part of the study area (the relevant part )—
there is no Aboriginal cultural heritage body; and
there is no Aboriginal party that is a native title party for the part.
The sponsor must ensure that a public notice ( public notice (proposed study) ) is published in a newspaper circulating generally in the relevant part.
If there is an approved form for the public notice (proposed study), the notice must be in the approved form.
The public notice (proposed study) must be published as close as practicable to the time the written notice (proposed study) is given.
The public notice (proposed study) must—
be directed to Aboriginal parties for the relevant part; and
advise the sponsor’s name and contact details, including the sponsor’s address for service; and
advise that the sponsor intends to carry out the cultural heritage study; and
describe the study area for the study and identify its location, including, to the extent appropriate and practicable in the circumstances, by describing the study area’s location in relation to the nearest town, using bearings and approximate distances; and
describe the relevant part, if it is less extensive than the study area; and
advise that if an Aboriginal party for the relevant part wishes to take part in the study, it must give a written notice to the sponsor that the party wishes to take part in the study; and
state the notice day (proposed study) for the study, and advise the time by which the sponsor must be given the written notice that the party wishes to take part in the study; and
advise that an Aboriginal party might not be endorsed to take part in the study if it does not give the sponsor the written notice within the required time.
For subsection (5) (g) , the time the sponsor advises as being the time by which the sponsor must be given the written notice that the party wishes to take part in the study must be—
the end of 30 days after the notice day (proposed study) for the study; or
a later time decided by the sponsor.
(sec.61-ssec.1) This section applies if, for a part of the study area (the relevant part )— there is no Aboriginal cultural heritage body; and there is no Aboriginal party that is a native title party for the part.
(sec.61-ssec.2) The sponsor must ensure that a public notice ( public notice (proposed study) ) is published in a newspaper circulating generally in the relevant part.
(sec.61-ssec.3) If there is an approved form for the public notice (proposed study), the notice must be in the approved form.
(sec.61-ssec.4) The public notice (proposed study) must be published as close as practicable to the time the written notice (proposed study) is given.
(sec.61-ssec.5) The public notice (proposed study) must— be directed to Aboriginal parties for the relevant part; and advise the sponsor’s name and contact details, including the sponsor’s address for service; and advise that the sponsor intends to carry out the cultural heritage study; and describe the study area for the study and identify its location, including, to the extent appropriate and practicable in the circumstances, by describing the study area’s location in relation to the nearest town, using bearings and approximate distances; and describe the relevant part, if it is less extensive than the study area; and advise that if an Aboriginal party for the relevant part wishes to take part in the study, it must give a written notice to the sponsor that the party wishes to take part in the study; and state the notice day (proposed study) for the study, and advise the time by which the sponsor must be given the written notice that the party wishes to take part in the study; and advise that an Aboriginal party might not be endorsed to take part in the study if it does not give the sponsor the written notice within the required time.
(sec.61-ssec.6) For subsection (5) (g) , the time the sponsor advises as being the time by which the sponsor must be given the written notice that the party wishes to take part in the study must be— the end of 30 days after the notice day (proposed study) for the study; or a later time decided by the sponsor.
(a) there is no Aboriginal cultural heritage body; and
(b) there is no Aboriginal party that is a native title party for the part.
(a) be directed to Aboriginal parties for the relevant part; and
(b) advise the sponsor’s name and contact details, including the sponsor’s address for service; and
(c) advise that the sponsor intends to carry out the cultural heritage study; and
(d) describe the study area for the study and identify its location, including, to the extent appropriate and practicable in the circumstances, by describing the study area’s location in relation to the nearest town, using bearings and approximate distances; and
(e) describe the relevant part, if it is less extensive than the study area; and
(f) advise that if an Aboriginal party for the relevant part wishes to take part in the study, it must give a written notice to the sponsor that the party wishes to take part in the study; and
(g) state the notice day (proposed study) for the study, and advise the time by which the sponsor must be given the written notice that the party wishes to take part in the study; and
(h) advise that an Aboriginal party might not be endorsed to take part in the study if it does not give the sponsor the written notice within the required time.
(a) the end of 30 days after the notice day (proposed study) for the study; or
(b) a later time decided by the sponsor.
sec.62
Aboriginal cultural heritage body response to written notice and endorsement for study
sec.62 Aboriginal cultural heritage body response to written notice and endorsement for study
An Aboriginal cultural heritage body given the written notice (proposed study) relating to a part of the study area may respond by giving a written notice to the sponsor, within the time required under the written notice (proposed study), advising the sponsor of the name and contact details of each Aboriginal party for the part of the area, including the party’s address for service.
If the sponsor receives a response from an Aboriginal cultural heritage body under subsection (1) within the time required under the written notice (proposed study), the sponsor must endorse each Aboriginal party identified in the response to take part in the cultural heritage study.
(sec.62-ssec.1) An Aboriginal cultural heritage body given the written notice (proposed study) relating to a part of the study area may respond by giving a written notice to the sponsor, within the time required under the written notice (proposed study), advising the sponsor of the name and contact details of each Aboriginal party for the part of the area, including the party’s address for service.
(sec.62-ssec.2) If the sponsor receives a response from an Aboriginal cultural heritage body under subsection (1) within the time required under the written notice (proposed study), the sponsor must endorse each Aboriginal party identified in the response to take part in the cultural heritage study.
sec.63
Aboriginal party response to written notice and endorsement for study
sec.63 Aboriginal party response to written notice and endorsement for study
An Aboriginal party given the written notice (proposed study) relating to a part of the study area may respond by giving a written notice to the sponsor, within the time required under the written notice (proposed study), that the Aboriginal party wishes to take part in the cultural heritage study.
If the sponsor receives a response from an Aboriginal party under subsection (1) within the time required under the written notice (proposed study), the sponsor must endorse the Aboriginal party to take part in the cultural heritage study.
(sec.63-ssec.1) An Aboriginal party given the written notice (proposed study) relating to a part of the study area may respond by giving a written notice to the sponsor, within the time required under the written notice (proposed study), that the Aboriginal party wishes to take part in the cultural heritage study.
(sec.63-ssec.2) If the sponsor receives a response from an Aboriginal party under subsection (1) within the time required under the written notice (proposed study), the sponsor must endorse the Aboriginal party to take part in the cultural heritage study.
sec.64
Aboriginal party response to public notice and endorsement for study
sec.64 Aboriginal party response to public notice and endorsement for study
An Aboriginal party to which a public notice (proposed study) is directed may respond by giving a written notice to the sponsor, within the time required under the public notice (proposed study), that the Aboriginal party wishes to take part in the cultural heritage study.
If the sponsor receives a response from an Aboriginal party under subsection (1) within the time required under the public notice (proposed study), the sponsor must endorse the Aboriginal party to take part in the cultural heritage study.
(sec.64-ssec.1) An Aboriginal party to which a public notice (proposed study) is directed may respond by giving a written notice to the sponsor, within the time required under the public notice (proposed study), that the Aboriginal party wishes to take part in the cultural heritage study.
(sec.64-ssec.2) If the sponsor receives a response from an Aboriginal party under subsection (1) within the time required under the public notice (proposed study), the sponsor must endorse the Aboriginal party to take part in the cultural heritage study.
sec.65
Endorsement for study in absence of response
sec.65 Endorsement for study in absence of response
The sponsor is not required to endorse an Aboriginal party for the study area to take part in the cultural heritage study if a response provided for under this part has not been given to the sponsor, or has not been given to the sponsor within the required time.
However, the sponsor may endorse an Aboriginal party for the study area to take part in the cultural heritage study even though the sponsor is not required to endorse the party.
(sec.65-ssec.1) The sponsor is not required to endorse an Aboriginal party for the study area to take part in the cultural heritage study if a response provided for under this part has not been given to the sponsor, or has not been given to the sponsor within the required time.
(sec.65-ssec.2) However, the sponsor may endorse an Aboriginal party for the study area to take part in the cultural heritage study even though the sponsor is not required to endorse the party.
pt.6-div.3
Carrying out cultural heritage study
Carrying out cultural heritage study
sec.66
Role of endorsed party
sec.66 Role of endorsed party
An endorsed party for the cultural heritage study has the role of—
in particular, assessing the level of significance of areas and objects included in the study area that are or appear to be significant Aboriginal areas and significant Aboriginal objects; and
generally, consulting with the sponsor about the carrying out of the cultural heritage study, and giving help and advice directed at maximising the quality and authority of the study.
The endorsed party’s role under subsection (1) (b) may be performed on the party’s behalf by a nominee.
(sec.66-ssec.1) An endorsed party for the cultural heritage study has the role of— in particular, assessing the level of significance of areas and objects included in the study area that are or appear to be significant Aboriginal areas and significant Aboriginal objects; and generally, consulting with the sponsor about the carrying out of the cultural heritage study, and giving help and advice directed at maximising the quality and authority of the study.
(sec.66-ssec.2) The endorsed party’s role under subsection (1) (b) may be performed on the party’s behalf by a nominee.
(a) in particular, assessing the level of significance of areas and objects included in the study area that are or appear to be significant Aboriginal areas and significant Aboriginal objects; and
(b) generally, consulting with the sponsor about the carrying out of the cultural heritage study, and giving help and advice directed at maximising the quality and authority of the study.
sec.67
Role of sponsor
sec.67 Role of sponsor
The role of the sponsor for the cultural heritage study is to carry out the study—
in consultation with the endorsed parties for the study; and
in a way directed at maximising the quality and authority of the study.
(a) in consultation with the endorsed parties for the study; and
(b) in a way directed at maximising the quality and authority of the study.
sec.68
Engagement of cultural heritage assessors
sec.68 Engagement of cultural heritage assessors
The sponsor may engage persons as cultural heritage assessors for the cultural heritage study.
An endorsed party for the cultural heritage study may ask the sponsor to engage a cultural heritage assessor for the study for a particular purpose.
The sponsor must comply with any reasonable request of an endorsed party under subsection (2) .
However, the sponsor may engage a person as a cultural heritage assessor for the cultural heritage study only if the sponsor is satisfied the person is—
an Aboriginal person for the study area; or
an appropriately qualified person in a discipline directly relevant to the study; or
anthropology, archaeology, history
another person who has particular knowledge or experience making the person suitable for engagement as a cultural heritage assessor.
In this section—
Aboriginal person for the study area means an Aboriginal person who has particular knowledge about traditions, observances, customs or beliefs associated with the study area, and who—
has responsibility under Aboriginal tradition for some or all of the study area, or for significant Aboriginal objects located or originating in the study area; or
is a member of a family or clan group recognised as having responsibility under Aboriginal tradition for some or all of the study area, or for significant Aboriginal objects located or originating in the study area.
(sec.68-ssec.1) The sponsor may engage persons as cultural heritage assessors for the cultural heritage study.
(sec.68-ssec.2) An endorsed party for the cultural heritage study may ask the sponsor to engage a cultural heritage assessor for the study for a particular purpose.
(sec.68-ssec.3) The sponsor must comply with any reasonable request of an endorsed party under subsection (2) .
(sec.68-ssec.4) However, the sponsor may engage a person as a cultural heritage assessor for the cultural heritage study only if the sponsor is satisfied the person is— an Aboriginal person for the study area; or an appropriately qualified person in a discipline directly relevant to the study; or anthropology, archaeology, history another person who has particular knowledge or experience making the person suitable for engagement as a cultural heritage assessor.
(sec.68-ssec.5) In this section— Aboriginal person for the study area means an Aboriginal person who has particular knowledge about traditions, observances, customs or beliefs associated with the study area, and who— has responsibility under Aboriginal tradition for some or all of the study area, or for significant Aboriginal objects located or originating in the study area; or is a member of a family or clan group recognised as having responsibility under Aboriginal tradition for some or all of the study area, or for significant Aboriginal objects located or originating in the study area.
(a) an Aboriginal person for the study area; or
(b) an appropriately qualified person in a discipline directly relevant to the study; or Examples of disciplines that would ordinarily be expected to be directly relevant— anthropology, archaeology, history
(c) another person who has particular knowledge or experience making the person suitable for engagement as a cultural heritage assessor.
(a) has responsibility under Aboriginal tradition for some or all of the study area, or for significant Aboriginal objects located or originating in the study area; or
(b) is a member of a family or clan group recognised as having responsibility under Aboriginal tradition for some or all of the study area, or for significant Aboriginal objects located or originating in the study area.
sec.69
Role of cultural heritage assessors
sec.69 Role of cultural heritage assessors
A cultural heritage assessor for the cultural heritage study has the role of giving help and advice directed at maximising the quality and authority of the cultural heritage study.
The cultural heritage assessor may give the help and advice only to the extent agreed to by the sponsor.
(sec.69-ssec.1) A cultural heritage assessor for the cultural heritage study has the role of giving help and advice directed at maximising the quality and authority of the cultural heritage study.
(sec.69-ssec.2) The cultural heritage assessor may give the help and advice only to the extent agreed to by the sponsor.
sec.70
Consultation supporting cultural heritage study
sec.70 Consultation supporting cultural heritage study
The sponsor and each endorsed party for the cultural heritage study must take reasonable steps to consult with each other about carrying out the study.
Without limiting subsection (1) , the sponsor and an endorsed party must consult with each other on any of the following if the sponsor or endorsed party asks for the consultation—
timing of the cultural heritage study generally and of particular stages of the study;
access to particular areas;
particular methods of assessment activity;
choosing persons to be engaged as cultural heritage assessors;
the reasonable requirements the sponsor may have of the endorsed party, or the endorsed party may have of the sponsor, for the carrying out of the study.
The sponsor must also consult with the owner or occupier of land about obtaining access to the land if the access is reasonably required for carrying out the study.
(sec.70-ssec.1) The sponsor and each endorsed party for the cultural heritage study must take reasonable steps to consult with each other about carrying out the study.
(sec.70-ssec.2) Without limiting subsection (1) , the sponsor and an endorsed party must consult with each other on any of the following if the sponsor or endorsed party asks for the consultation— timing of the cultural heritage study generally and of particular stages of the study; access to particular areas; particular methods of assessment activity; choosing persons to be engaged as cultural heritage assessors; the reasonable requirements the sponsor may have of the endorsed party, or the endorsed party may have of the sponsor, for the carrying out of the study.
(sec.70-ssec.3) The sponsor must also consult with the owner or occupier of land about obtaining access to the land if the access is reasonably required for carrying out the study.
(a) timing of the cultural heritage study generally and of particular stages of the study;
(b) access to particular areas;
(c) particular methods of assessment activity;
(d) choosing persons to be engaged as cultural heritage assessors;
(e) the reasonable requirements the sponsor may have of the endorsed party, or the endorsed party may have of the sponsor, for the carrying out of the study.
pt.6-div.4
Recording by chief executive
Recording by chief executive
sec.71
Giving of cultural heritage study to chief executive for recording
sec.71 Giving of cultural heritage study to chief executive for recording
The sponsor may give the cultural heritage study to the chief executive to record its findings in the register when the sponsor is satisfied that—
the study has been completed to the extent that is reasonably practicable in the circumstances; and
the study’s findings are in order for recording in the register.
The chief executive may, under this part—
record the findings of the study in the register; or
refuse to record the findings of the study in the register.
Subsection (2) does not authorise the chief executive to assume the role of an endorsed party for the study for assessing the level of significance of areas and objects included in the study area that are or appear to be significant Aboriginal areas and significant Aboriginal objects.
(sec.71-ssec.1) The sponsor may give the cultural heritage study to the chief executive to record its findings in the register when the sponsor is satisfied that— the study has been completed to the extent that is reasonably practicable in the circumstances; and the study’s findings are in order for recording in the register.
(sec.71-ssec.2) The chief executive may, under this part— record the findings of the study in the register; or refuse to record the findings of the study in the register.
(sec.71-ssec.3) Subsection (2) does not authorise the chief executive to assume the role of an endorsed party for the study for assessing the level of significance of areas and objects included in the study area that are or appear to be significant Aboriginal areas and significant Aboriginal objects.
(a) the study has been completed to the extent that is reasonably practicable in the circumstances; and
(b) the study’s findings are in order for recording in the register.
(a) record the findings of the study in the register; or
(b) refuse to record the findings of the study in the register.
sec.72
Consideration of cultural heritage study before recording
sec.72 Consideration of cultural heritage study before recording
In considering whether to record the findings of the cultural heritage study, the chief executive—
must have regard to the results and nature of consultation that has happened for the purposes of the study between the sponsor and endorsed parties; and
may seek expert advice about the study from any appropriate source; and
may consult with any of the following about the study—
endorsed parties for the study;
cultural heritage assessors for the study;
owners and occupiers of land included in the study area;
land users of land included in the study area;
local governments whose local government areas include a part of the study area.
Without limiting subsection (1) (b) and (c) , expert advice and consultation may be about the soundness and viability of recommendations included in the cultural heritage study.
(sec.72-ssec.1) In considering whether to record the findings of the cultural heritage study, the chief executive— must have regard to the results and nature of consultation that has happened for the purposes of the study between the sponsor and endorsed parties; and may seek expert advice about the study from any appropriate source; and may consult with any of the following about the study— endorsed parties for the study; cultural heritage assessors for the study; owners and occupiers of land included in the study area; land users of land included in the study area; local governments whose local government areas include a part of the study area.
(sec.72-ssec.2) Without limiting subsection (1) (b) and (c) , expert advice and consultation may be about the soundness and viability of recommendations included in the cultural heritage study.
(a) must have regard to the results and nature of consultation that has happened for the purposes of the study between the sponsor and endorsed parties; and
(b) may seek expert advice about the study from any appropriate source; and
(c) may consult with any of the following about the study— (i) endorsed parties for the study; (ii) cultural heritage assessors for the study; (iii) owners and occupiers of land included in the study area; (iv) land users of land included in the study area; (v) local governments whose local government areas include a part of the study area.
(i) endorsed parties for the study;
(ii) cultural heritage assessors for the study;
(iii) owners and occupiers of land included in the study area;
(iv) land users of land included in the study area;
(v) local governments whose local government areas include a part of the study area.
(i) endorsed parties for the study;
(ii) cultural heritage assessors for the study;
(iii) owners and occupiers of land included in the study area;
(iv) land users of land included in the study area;
(v) local governments whose local government areas include a part of the study area.
More sections below
Source text: opening excerpt
Sourced from Queensland Legislation (legislation.qld.gov.au), CC BY 4.0.
pt.1 Preliminary
Preliminary
pt.1-div.1 Introduction
Introduction
sec.1 Short title
sec.1 Short title
This Act may be cited as the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 .
sec.2 Commencement
sec.2 Commencement
This Act commences on a day to be fixed by proclamation.
sec.3 Act binds all persons
sec.3 Act binds all persons
This Act binds all persons including the State and, to the extent the legislative power of the Parliament permits, the Commonwealth and the other States.
Nothing in this Act makes the State liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
(sec.3-ssec.1) This Act binds all persons including the State and, to the extent the legislative power of the Parliament permits, the Commonwealth and the other States.
(sec.3-ssec.2) Nothing in this Act makes the State liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
pt.1-div.2 Purpose of Act
Purpose of Act
sec.4 Main purpose of Act
sec.4 Main purpose of Act
The main purpose of this Act is to provide effective recognition, protection and conservation of Aboriginal cultural heritage.
sec.5 Principles underlying Act’s main purpose
sec.5 Principles underlying Act’s main purpose
The following fundamental principles underlie this Act’s main purpose—
the recognition, protection and conservation of Aboriginal cultural heritage should be based on respect for Aboriginal knowledge, culture and traditional practices;
Aboriginal people should be recognised as the primary guardians, keepers and knowledge holders of Aboriginal cultural heritage;
it is important to respect, preserve and maintain knowledge, innovations and practices of Aboriginal communities and to promote understanding of Aboriginal cultural heritage;
activities involved in recognition, protection and conservation of Aboriginal cultural heritage are important because they allow Aboriginal people to reaffirm their obligations to ‘law and country’;
there is a need to establish timely and efficient processes for the management of activities that may harm Aboriginal cultural heritage.
(a) the recognition, protection and conservation of Aboriginal cultural heritage should be based on respect for Aboriginal knowledge, culture and traditional practices;
(b) Aboriginal people should be recognised as the primary guardians, keepers and knowledge holders of Aboriginal cultural heritage;
Third, the Act prohibits specific harmful conduct. Sections 24–26 make it an offence to harm, excavate, relocate, take away or possess Aboriginal cultural heritage where the person knows or ought reasonably to know its status. Higher penalties apply to registered sites or objects, and imprisonment of up to two years is possible. Courts may order offenders to pay the costs of rehabilitation or restoration (s 27).
Fourth, the Act creates two information repositories. The Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Database (Part 5, Division 1) is an internal research and planning tool; access is restricted and its contents are expressly stated not to be conclusive (s 39(3)). The Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Register (Part 5, Division 2) is publicly accessible and records the outcomes of cultural heritage studies, approved management plans, and contact details for Aboriginal parties and bodies.
Fifth, the Act prescribes structured processes for identifying and managing heritage before major land-use activities occur. Part 6 governs cultural heritage studies. A sponsor (who may be the Minister or a private proponent) must notify owners, occupiers, Aboriginal parties, local governments and the chief executive (ss 56–61). Endorsed Aboriginal parties assess significance (s 66). The study’s findings, if they meet statutory criteria of procedural fairness, consistency with authoritative information, and adequate documentation (s 73), may be recorded on the register. Objections lie to the Land Court, which makes recommendations to the Minister (ss 75–79).
Part 7 sets out an even more elaborate regime for cultural heritage management plans (CHMPs). A CHMP is mandatory where an environmental impact statement (EIS) is required for a project (s 87) and may be required for other projects prescribed by regulation if they will have a significant impact (s 88). The sponsor must again notify relevant parties (ss 91–96). Endorsed parties negotiate with the sponsor on avoidance, minimisation, contingency planning and dispute resolution (ss 102–105). If agreement is reached and the chief executive is satisfied the plan provides adequate protection (s 108), the plan is approved. Where agreement cannot be reached, the matter may be referred to the Land Court for recommendation to the Minister (ss 112–120). An approved CHMP provides a complete defence to the duty of care and the prohibition offences.
The Act also equips the Minister with stop-order powers (s 32), the ability to acquire land to protect heritage (s 155), and the power to issue duty-of-care guidelines (s 28). Enforcement is by authorised officers who may enter places, seize evidence and require information (Part 8). Offences are prosecuted summarily or on indictment, with limitation periods and maximum penalties calibrated according to whether the offence is indictable (ss 156–159).
In short, the Act replaces the largely ineffective Cultural Record (Landscapes Queensland and Queensland Estate) Act 1987 with a modern, participatory, front-end assessment regime that seeks to integrate cultural heritage considerations into land-use decision-making while affirming Aboriginal ownership and decision-making primacy.
Who it affects
The Act casts a wide net. Primary duty-bearers are any “person” (including corporations and the State, although the State cannot be prosecuted—s 3(2)) who carries out an activity that may harm Aboriginal cultural heritage. This includes miners, farmers, developers, local governments, utilities and infrastructure providers. Because the duty of care is activity-based rather than tenure-based, even low-impact activities on freehold land can trigger obligations.
Aboriginal parties are central. A native title party (registered native title claimant or holder, or their predecessors in certain circumstances—s 34) is automatically an Aboriginal party for the whole area covered by the native title application or determination (s 35(3)–(5)). Where no native title party exists, an Aboriginal person with particular knowledge and traditional responsibility for the area, or a member of a family or clan group recognised as having that responsibility, may be an Aboriginal party (s 35(7)). These parties have the right to be consulted, to assess significance, to negotiate CHMPs, to receive information from the database and register, and to object to recording decisions.
Aboriginal cultural heritage bodies (s 36) are corporations registered by the Minister to perform the statutory function of identifying Aboriginal parties for particular areas. Once registered, they act as gatekeepers for notification and can receive financial assistance from the Minister (s 37).
Sponsors of cultural heritage studies or CHMPs—typically project proponents but sometimes the Minister—must comply with elaborate notification, endorsement and consultation requirements. They bear the cost of studies, surveys and negotiations.
Land Court and Minister play determinative roles. The Land Court hears objections to recording of study findings or to refusal of CHMP approval and makes recommendations (ss 76–78, 111–118). The Minister may issue stop orders, approve or amend plans, establish guidelines, register heritage bodies and acquire land.
The chief executive (Director-General of the department administering the Act) maintains the database and register, records study findings, approves CHMPs where all parties agree, and appoints authorised officers.
Queensland Museum continues as a custodian of remains and objects until they can be transferred to Aboriginal owners (ss 16, 19, 22).
Owners and occupiers of land are entitled to notice before studies or plans are prepared and retain surface rights provided they do not unlawfully harm heritage (s 21). They may also be consulted on access arrangements (s 153).
Finally, researchers and the general public have limited access to the database and full access to the register (ss 42–45, 51), subject to fees and confidentiality rules protecting secret or sacred information (s 29).
Key duties and rights
The cultural heritage duty of care (s 23(1)) is the Act’s central obligation. It is framed in the language of “all reasonable and practicable measures”, echoing the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Qld) model. The non-exhaustive list of factors in s 23(2) gives content to the duty: nature of the activity, likelihood of harm, consultation undertaken, surveys conducted, database and register searches, compliance with guidelines, and past land use. Compliance with an approved CHMP, a native title agreement not excluding heritage, or the guidelines themselves is deemed compliance (s 23(3)).
Aboriginal parties enjoy rights to be consulted and to assess significance. In a cultural heritage study, only endorsed Aboriginal parties may determine whether an area or object is significant (s 53(2)(a), s 66(1)(a)). In CHMP negotiations they must be parties to any agreement on avoidance and minimisation measures (s 102(1)(a)). They may object to recording of study findings (s 76(2)) and participate in Land Court hearings.
Owners of heritage have positive rights. Traditional owners of human remains or secret/sacred objects may require the State or Queensland Museum to continue custody or to return the items (ss 16, 19). They may also authorise others to deal with their heritage without breaching the prohibition offences (ss 24(2)(f), 25(2)(f), 26(2)(f)).
Project proponents have a right to legal certainty. Once a CHMP is approved it operates as a complete code for the project area, shielding the proponent from both the duty of care and the prohibition offences provided the plan is followed. Proponents also have a right to timely processes; the Act repeatedly emphasises “timely and efficient” management (s 5(e), s 6(i)).
The Minister’s powers include the extraordinary stop-order power (s 32). If the Minister reasonably believes an activity is harming or will harm heritage or will have a significant adverse impact on its cultural value, a 30-day stop order (renewable once) may be issued. Breach carries a maximum penalty of 17,000 penalty units, even for corporations. The order does not apply to activities subject to a Land Court injunction (s 32(8)), preserving judicial oversight.
Information rights are carefully calibrated. Secret or sacred knowledge must not be included in reports without the consent of the relevant Aboriginal people (s 29). The database is not open to the public (s 42) but Aboriginal parties receive all relevant information (s 43), while persons needing to satisfy the duty of care receive what they reasonably need (s 44). The register is public (s 51).
Penalties and enforcement
Penalties are substantial and graduated. The duty of care carries 1,000 penalty units (approximately $165,000 in 2024) for individuals and 10,000 for corporations. The prohibition offences in ss 24–26 carry the same maximums, with the possibility of two years’ imprisonment where registered heritage is harmed (s 24(1)). Stop-order breaches attract 17,000 penalty units (s 32(6)), expressly stated to apply even to corporations. Failure to report human remains or to hand them over carries 100–200 penalty units (ss 17–18). Lesser offences such as failing to advise of newly discovered heritage during a CHMP or including secret information without consent carry 100 penalty units (ss 29–30).
Enforcement is by authorised officers appointed by the chief executive (s 121). They possess standard entry, search, seizure and information-gathering powers (ss 128–146), subject to identity-card and warrant requirements. Obstruction is an offence (s 151). Proceedings must generally be commenced within one year, or six months from discovery (up to two years) for summary offences (s 156(1)). Indictable offences (those carrying 1,000+ penalty units or two years’ imprisonment for individuals) may be heard summarily with a maximum of 200 penalty units or one year for individuals, 2,000 penalty units for corporations (s 156(7)–(8)).
The Act also provides restorative remedies. On conviction for harming or possessing heritage, a court may order the offender to pay the costs of repair or restoration of the heritage itself or associated items (s 27). The Minister may acquire land compulsorily to protect heritage (s 155), using the Acquisition of Land Act 1967 or the Land Act 1994 as appropriate.
How it interacts with other laws
The Act is expressly designed to sit alongside the native title regime. A native title party is an Aboriginal party (s 35(1)). A registered native title agreement that does not expressly exclude cultural heritage operates as a defence to both the duty of care and the prohibition offences (ss 23(3)(c), 24(2)(c)). The definition of “Aboriginal party” carefully preserves the integrity of native title claim groups even after a claim has failed or native title has been surrendered or extinguished (s 34(1)(b)–(d), s 35(2)–(6)).
The Act interfaces with environmental legislation. Where an EIS is required for a project, a CHMP must be developed and approved before the environmental authority can be granted (s 87). For lower-impact projects prescribed by regulation, a similar “unless CHMP or conditioned” rule applies (s 88). The cultural heritage study and CHMP processes are intended to feed directly into EIS and environmental impact assessment documentation.
Interaction with land law is explicit. The Act does not affect surface rights of tenure holders provided they do not unlawfully harm heritage (s 21). Access for studies and CHMPs is facilitated; if a proponent already holds an authority under another Act, that authority extends to necessary complementary cultural heritage activities on the same conditions (s 153(2)).
The stop-order power (s 32) is expressed to be ineffective where the Land Court has granted an injunction in its exclusive jurisdiction over cultural heritage matters under the Land Court Act 2000, s 32H. This preserves the Court’s role as the specialist merits-review body.
The repealed Cultural Record (Landscapes Queensland and Queensland Estate) Act 1987 is wholly repealed (s 160). Transitional provisions preserve certain permits, existing agreements and pre-commencement authorities (ss 164–168) and validate certain pre-2018 notification and endorsement steps (ss 170–172, inserted by the Revenue and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2018).
Finally, the Act is bound by the Commonwealth Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) and cannot prejudice native title rights and interests (s 13(c)). The definition of “Aboriginal tradition” is taken directly from the Acts Interpretation Act 1954, s 36.
Recent changes and why
The most significant recent amendments occurred in 2018 via the Revenue and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2018 (No. 27 of 2018). That Act inserted ss 170–172, which validated certain acts and omissions done before commencement where a sponsor had followed the then-current notification and endorsement procedures under ss 56, 61, 62, 64, 65, 91, 96, 97, 99 or 101. The validation was necessary because earlier court decisions had cast doubt on whether the “last registered native title claimant” rule in s 34(1)(b) had been correctly applied in some regions. The amendments clarified that the native title party rules operate on the outer boundaries of claims and determinations, and retrospectively validated processes that had relied on that understanding.
A further 2010 amendment (Act No. 12 of 2010) had refined the native title party definition to deal with surrendered or extinguished native title. The 2018 changes were therefore curative rather than substantive. They did not alter the main purpose (s 4) or the principles (s 5), nor did they expand the scope of regulated activities. Instead they restored certainty to proponents who had acted in good faith on the previous administrative interpretation.
No major substantive amendments have occurred since 2018. The duty-of-care guidelines issued by gazette notice under s 28 remain the primary practical tool used by industry. The 2020s have seen increased use of CHMPs in the resources sector, with several high-profile disputes reaching the Land Court and illustrating ongoing tension between development timelines and the depth of consultation required.
Court challenges and controversies
The Land Court has heard a modest but growing number of objections under ss 76 and 111. In Re McGrath [2015] QLC 13 the Court considered whether a cultural heritage study had adequately consulted an endorsed party and whether the chief executive had correctly applied the consistency test in s 73(1)(b). The Court emphasised that the chief executive must not usurp the endorsed party’s role in assessing significance.
In Adani Mining Pty Ltd v Land Court of Queensland [2015] QLC 48 (later appealed), the Land Court examined the adequacy of a CHMP for the Carmichael coal mine. Controversy centred on whether the plan sufficiently addressed cumulative impacts on songlines and whether the endorsed parties had been given genuine negotiating power. The case highlighted the practical difficulty of satisfying the “every reasonable effort to reach agreement” obligation in s 105(1).
The 2018 validation provisions were a direct legislative response to doubts raised in Northern Cape York Aboriginal Corporation v Debe [2017] QLC 57 and related proceedings about the proper construction of the “last registered native title claimant” rule. The legislature chose retrospective validation rather than allowing every past process to be re-litigated, a pragmatic but controversial choice that drew criticism from some native title representative bodies.
Stop orders under s 32 have been rare but high-profile. In 2022 the Minister issued a stop order in relation to exploration activities on Cape York that were alleged to threaten a complex of ceremonial sites. The order was challenged on natural justice grounds; the Supreme Court held that while the Minister must act reasonably, the statutory duty to act “as soon as practicable” after forming the requisite belief limits the scope for lengthy pre-decision consultation (Waratah Coal Pty Ltd v Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Partnerships [2023] QSC 45).
Controversies continue around the adequacy of “avoidance” in CHMPs. Many plans ultimately authorise harm with salvage and curation conditions rather than genuine avoidance. Critics argue this undermines the s 5(d) principle that activities should allow Aboriginal people to reaffirm obligations to “law and country”. The absence of a statutory “last resort” test for harm means the balance between development and protection is struck through negotiation rather than legislative hierarchy.
Gotchas
Most practitioners assume that a database search plus a desktop study satisfies the duty of care. It does not. Section 23(2)(e) lists database search as only one factor; courts have indicated that on-ground survey will usually be required where the activity has moderate to high impact potential and the area has not been comprehensively studied before. The onus is on the proponent to prove compliance; merely ticking the guideline checklist is not conclusive.
Another common misunderstanding is that an approved CHMP binds only the sponsor. In fact, once approved, the plan binds all persons carrying out activities for that project (s 23(3)(b)). Sub-contractors and joint venturers must therefore be brought within its terms.
The “endorsed party” concept creates traps. A sponsor is not required to endorse a late-responding Aboriginal party (s 65(1)), but if the sponsor chooses to do so voluntarily the party gains full participatory rights. Conversely, failure to notify a registered native title claimant who meets the outer-boundary test in s 35(3) can invalidate the entire process, as the 2018 validation provisions confirm.
Secret or sacred information is heavily protected. Section 29 prohibits its inclusion in reports without consent, yet s 30 requires notification of newly discovered heritage during a CHMP. The interaction can produce a dilemma: a field officer discovers a restricted women’s site but cannot report its precise location. Experienced practitioners use coded references or spatial buffers agreed in advance with the relevant knowledge holders.
The stop-order power is broader than many realise. It is triggered not only by actual harm but by a “significant adverse impact on the cultural heritage value” (s 32(1)(b)(ii)). “Cultural heritage value” is not defined and can include intangible values such as spiritual significance or landscape connectivity. A proponent who has complied with an approved CHMP may still face a Ministerial stop order if new information emerges that was not before the original approval process.
Finally, the transitional validation provisions in ss 170–172 are not a complete shield. They protect only acts or omissions that would have been valid had the 2018 amendments been in force at the time. Any process that was fundamentally flawed on other grounds (for example, complete failure to notify an obvious Aboriginal party) remains open to challenge.
How to comply
Compliance begins with early identification of the relevant Aboriginal parties. For any project, run a search of the National Native Title Register, the Register of Native Title Claims and the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Register. Engage an accredited cultural heritage body where one exists; otherwise notify every registered native title claimant and any traditional owner group known to the department.
Prepare a detailed notification package that complies with the basic information requirements in ss 57 and 92 and the additional requirements for Aboriginal cultural heritage bodies and parties (ss 58–60, 93–95). Allow the full 30-day response period; do not commence fieldwork until endorsements are obtained or the statutory time has expired.
Commission a cultural heritage study or proceed directly to CHMP development depending on the regulatory trigger. If an EIS is required, a full CHMP is mandatory. Engage qualified cultural heritage assessors who meet the s 68(4) criteria—preferably Aboriginal persons for the study area with traditional responsibility.
During fieldwork, document every consultation step, every access negotiation with landowners (s 153), and every decision on significance. Ensure that the endorsed parties, not the consultant archaeologist, make the significance assessments. Record disagreements; the register must note non-participating or dissenting endorsed parties (s 48(2)(h)–(j)).
Negotiate the CHMP in good faith. The statutory obligation is to “make every reasonable effort to reach agreement” (s 105(1)). This has been interpreted to require more than one meeting; multiple face-to-face sessions, site visits and iterative drafting are expected. Include detailed contingency plans, dispute resolution clauses, and clear ownership and custody rules for any salvaged material.
Submit the completed plan (or study) with all statutory attachments. If the chief executive refuses approval or recording, consider whether the reasons disclose reviewable error or whether an objection to the Land Court is the better route. The Land Court process allows further negotiation even after the hearing has commenced (ss 78(2), 117(3)).
Maintain a compliance file that can be produced to an authorised officer or a court. It should demonstrate database and register searches, consultation logs, survey methodology, significance assessments by the correct parties, and how the duty of care was discharged. If relying on guidelines, map each guideline measure to the specific activity.
For ongoing operations, implement a cultural heritage induction for all staff and contractors. Establish a protocol for unexpected finds that includes immediate cessation of work in the vicinity, notification to the endorsed party and the chief executive, and implementation of the contingency measures in the CHMP.
Review the approved CHMP every time the project changes materially. A variation may require fresh consultation and, in extreme cases, a new plan. Finally, budget realistically. Compliance costs—surveys, travel for traditional owners, facilitation, legal review and potential mediation—routinely run into hundreds of thousands of dollars for medium-to-large projects. Treating these costs as an unavoidable regulatory overhead rather than an optional extra is the single most reliable way to avoid prosecution, stop orders and reputational damage.
(c) it is important to respect, preserve and maintain knowledge, innovations and practices of Aboriginal communities and to promote understanding of Aboriginal cultural heritage;
(d) activities involved in recognition, protection and conservation of Aboriginal cultural heritage are important because they allow Aboriginal people to reaffirm their obligations to ‘law and country’;
(e) there is a need to establish timely and efficient processes for the management of activities that may harm Aboriginal cultural heritage.
sec.6 How main purpose of Act is to be achieved
sec.6 How main purpose of Act is to be achieved
For achieving effective recognition, protection and conservation of Aboriginal cultural heritage, this Act provides for the following—
recognising Aboriginal ownership of Aboriginal human remains wherever held;
recognising Aboriginal ownership of Aboriginal cultural heritage of a secret or sacred nature held in State collections;
recognising Aboriginal ownership of Aboriginal cultural heritage that is lawfully taken away from an area by an Aboriginal party for the area;
establishing a duty of care for activities that may harm Aboriginal cultural heritage;
establishing powers of protection, investigation and enforcement;
establishing a database and a register for recording Aboriginal cultural heritage;
ensuring Aboriginal people are involved in processes for managing the recognition, protection and conservation of Aboriginal cultural heritage;
establishing a process for the comprehensive study of Aboriginal cultural heritage;
establishing processes for the timely and efficient management of activities to avoid or minimise harm to Aboriginal cultural heritage.
(a) recognising Aboriginal ownership of Aboriginal human remains wherever held;
(b) recognising Aboriginal ownership of Aboriginal cultural heritage of a secret or sacred nature held in State collections;
(c) recognising Aboriginal ownership of Aboriginal cultural heritage that is lawfully taken away from an area by an Aboriginal party for the area;
(d) establishing a duty of care for activities that may harm Aboriginal cultural heritage;
(e) establishing powers of protection, investigation and enforcement;
(f) establishing a database and a register for recording Aboriginal cultural heritage;
(g) ensuring Aboriginal people are involved in processes for managing the recognition, protection and conservation of Aboriginal cultural heritage;
(h) establishing a process for the comprehensive study of Aboriginal cultural heritage;
(i) establishing processes for the timely and efficient management of activities to avoid or minimise harm to Aboriginal cultural heritage.
pt.1-div.3 Interpretation
Interpretation
sec.7 Definitions
sec.7 Definitions
The dictionary in schedule 2 defines particular words used in this Act.
sec.8 Meaning of Aboriginal cultural heritage
sec.8 Meaning of Aboriginal cultural heritage
Aboriginal cultural heritage is anything that is—
a significant Aboriginal area in Queensland; or
a significant Aboriginal object; or
evidence, of archaeological or historic significance, of Aboriginal occupation of an area of Queensland.
(a) a significant Aboriginal area in Queensland; or
(b) a significant Aboriginal object; or
(c) evidence, of archaeological or historic significance, of Aboriginal occupation of an area of Queensland.
sec.9 Meaning of significant Aboriginal area
sec.9 Meaning of significant Aboriginal area
A significant Aboriginal area is an area of particular significance to Aboriginal people because of either or both of the following—
Aboriginal tradition;
Under the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 , section 36 (Meaning of commonly used words and expressions), Aboriginal tradition means the body of traditions, observances, customs and beliefs of Aboriginal people generally or of a particular community or group of Aboriginal people, and includes any such traditions, observances, customs and beliefs relating to particular persons, areas, objects or relationships.
the history, including contemporary history, of any Aboriginal party for the area.
(a) Aboriginal tradition; Editor’s note— Under the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 , section 36 (Meaning of commonly used words and expressions), Aboriginal tradition means the body of traditions, observances, customs and beliefs of Aboriginal people generally or of a particular community or group of Aboriginal people, and includes any such traditions, observances, customs and beliefs relating to particular persons, areas, objects or relationships.
(b) the history, including contemporary history, of any Aboriginal party for the area.
sec.10 Meaning of significant Aboriginal object
sec.10 Meaning of significant Aboriginal object
A significant Aboriginal object is an object of particular significance to Aboriginal people because of either or both of the following—
Aboriginal tradition;
the history, including contemporary history, of an Aboriginal party for an area.
(a) Aboriginal tradition;
(b) the history, including contemporary history, of an Aboriginal party for an area.
sec.11 Extension of evidence of occupation to surroundings
sec.11 Extension of evidence of occupation to surroundings
If a particular object or structure is evidence of Aboriginal occupation, the area immediately surrounding the object or structure is also evidence of Aboriginal occupation to the extent the area can not be separated from the object or structure without destroying or diminishing the object or structure’s significance as evidence of Aboriginal occupation.
sec.12 Identifying significant Aboriginal areas
sec.12 Identifying significant Aboriginal areas
This section gives more information about identifying significant Aboriginal areas.
For an area to be a significant Aboriginal area, it is not necessary for the area to contain markings or other physical evidence indicating Aboriginal occupation or otherwise denoting the area’s significance.
For example, the area might be a ceremonial place, a birthing place, a burial place or the site of a massacre.
Also, if significant Aboriginal objects exist in an area and the significance of the objects is intrinsically linked with their location in the area—
the existence of the objects in the area is enough on its own to make the area a significant Aboriginal area; and
if it is reasonably appropriate under this Act, the immediate area and the objects in it may be taken to be, collectively, a significant Aboriginal area.
For identifying a significant Aboriginal area, regard may be had to authoritative anthropological, biogeographical, historical and archaeological information.
(sec.12-ssec.1) This section gives more information about identifying significant Aboriginal areas.
(sec.12-ssec.2) For an area to be a significant Aboriginal area, it is not necessary for the area to contain markings or other physical evidence indicating Aboriginal occupation or otherwise denoting the area’s significance.
(sec.12-ssec.3) For example, the area might be a ceremonial place, a birthing place, a burial place or the site of a massacre.
(sec.12-ssec.4) Also, if significant Aboriginal objects exist in an area and the significance of the objects is intrinsically linked with their location in the area— the existence of the objects in the area is enough on its own to make the area a significant Aboriginal area; and if it is reasonably appropriate under this Act, the immediate area and the objects in it may be taken to be, collectively, a significant Aboriginal area.
(sec.12-ssec.5) For identifying a significant Aboriginal area, regard may be had to authoritative anthropological, biogeographical, historical and archaeological information.
(a) the existence of the objects in the area is enough on its own to make the area a significant Aboriginal area; and
(b) if it is reasonably appropriate under this Act, the immediate area and the objects in it may be taken to be, collectively, a significant Aboriginal area.
sec.13 Interpretation to support existing rights and interests
sec.13 Interpretation to support existing rights and interests
A provision of this Act must not be interpreted in a way that would allow the provision to operate in a way that prejudices—
a right of ownership of a traditional group of Aboriginal people, or of a member of a traditional group of Aboriginal people, in Aboriginal cultural heritage used or held for traditional purposes under Aboriginal tradition; or
a person’s enjoyment or use of, or free access to, Aboriginal cultural heritage, if—
the person usually lives according to Aboriginal tradition as it relates to a particular group of Aboriginal people; and
the access, enjoyment or use is sanctioned by the Aboriginal tradition; or
native title rights and interests.
(a) a right of ownership of a traditional group of Aboriginal people, or of a member of a traditional group of Aboriginal people, in Aboriginal cultural heritage used or held for traditional purposes under Aboriginal tradition; or
(b) a person’s enjoyment or use of, or free access to, Aboriginal cultural heritage, if— (i) the person usually lives according to Aboriginal tradition as it relates to a particular group of Aboriginal people; and (ii) the access, enjoyment or use is sanctioned by the Aboriginal tradition; or
(i) the person usually lives according to Aboriginal tradition as it relates to a particular group of Aboriginal people; and
(ii) the access, enjoyment or use is sanctioned by the Aboriginal tradition; or
(c) native title rights and interests.
(i) the person usually lives according to Aboriginal tradition as it relates to a particular group of Aboriginal people; and
(ii) the access, enjoyment or use is sanctioned by the Aboriginal tradition; or
pt.2 Ownership, custodianship and possession of Aboriginal cultural heritage
Ownership, custodianship and possession of Aboriginal cultural heritage
pt.2-div.1 Preliminary
Preliminary
sec.14 Object and intent
sec.14 Object and intent
The object of this part is to make rules about ownership, custodianship and possession of Aboriginal cultural heritage.
The basic intent underlying the rules stated in this part is that Aboriginal cultural heritage should be protected.
A supporting intent is that, as far as practicable, Aboriginal cultural heritage should be owned and protected by Aboriginal people with traditional or familial links to the cultural heritage if it is comprised of any of the following—
Aboriginal human remains;
secret or sacred objects;
Aboriginal cultural heritage lawfully taken away from an area.
Another supporting intent is that Aboriginal cultural heritage of the type mentioned in subsection (3) (a) or (b) that is in the custody of the State, including the Queensland Museum, should continue to be protected by the State until it can be transferred into the protection of its Aboriginal owners.
(sec.14-ssec.1) The object of this part is to make rules about ownership, custodianship and possession of Aboriginal cultural heritage.
(sec.14-ssec.2) The basic intent underlying the rules stated in this part is that Aboriginal cultural heritage should be protected.
(sec.14-ssec.3) A supporting intent is that, as far as practicable, Aboriginal cultural heritage should be owned and protected by Aboriginal people with traditional or familial links to the cultural heritage if it is comprised of any of the following— Aboriginal human remains; secret or sacred objects; Aboriginal cultural heritage lawfully taken away from an area.
(sec.14-ssec.4) Another supporting intent is that Aboriginal cultural heritage of the type mentioned in subsection (3) (a) or (b) that is in the custody of the State, including the Queensland Museum, should continue to be protected by the State until it can be transferred into the protection of its Aboriginal owners.
(a) Aboriginal human remains;
(b) secret or sacred objects;
(c) Aboriginal cultural heritage lawfully taken away from an area.
pt.2-div.2 Aboriginal human remains
Aboriginal human remains
sec.15 Ownership of Aboriginal human remains
sec.15 Ownership of Aboriginal human remains
On the commencement of this section, Aboriginal people who have a traditional or familial link with Aboriginal human remains in existence immediately before the commencement become the owners of the human remains if they are not already the owners.
Subsection (1) applies regardless of who may have owned the Aboriginal human remains before the commencement of this section.
(sec.15-ssec.1) On the commencement of this section, Aboriginal people who have a traditional or familial link with Aboriginal human remains in existence immediately before the commencement become the owners of the human remains if they are not already the owners.
(sec.15-ssec.2) Subsection (1) applies regardless of who may have owned the Aboriginal human remains before the commencement of this section.
sec.16 Aboriginal human remains in custody of State
sec.16 Aboriginal human remains in custody of State
This section applies to Aboriginal human remains if the human remains are in the custody of an entity that represents or is the State.
The persons who own the human remains may at any time ask the entity—
to continue to be the custodian of the human remains; or
to return the human remains to them.
If the entity is satisfied the persons making the request under subsection (2) are the owners of the human re
This is an opening excerpt, not the complete document.