Pastoral Land Act 1992 (Northern Territory) — Zoe

Northern Territory act

Pastoral Land Act 1992

In ForceNT

Jurisdiction

Northern Territory

Collection

act

Plain English Summary

8/10 complexity

What this law does, who it affects, and how it works (plain English)

What it is: The Pastoral Land Act 1992 sets out how the Northern Territory grants, manages and regulates pastoral leases (Crown land leased for grazing and related pastoral activities). It creates a Pastoral Land Board, gives roles to the Minister and an Agency for technical work, and establishes processes for leasing, monitoring, remediation, permits and dispute review (see s11, s29, s10, s54).
Who it affects: Pastoral lessees (people or entities holding pastoral leases), prospective lessees, mortgagees in possession, Aboriginal persons with traditional connections to land, the Minister, the Pastoral Land Board and the Agency that determines carrying capacity. It also affects any person proposing non-pastoral activity, clearing or public users of waterways across pastoral land (see definitions in s3, duties in s6, non-pastoral permits in s85A, clearing in s91C and access rules in Part 6).
Core mechanics:
- Granting and form of leases: The Minister grants pastoral leases; leases may be term or perpetual and are recorded with the Registrar-General (s31, s48). Some leases convert to perpetual leases under schedule or ministerial notice (s130, Schedule 1).
- Limits on scale and disclosures: A person (alone or with associates) cannot hold more than 13,000 km2 of pastoral land unless an exception applies (s34). The Minister can require statutory declarations to establish whether holdings exceed limits (s35(1)–(6)).

JSON API

Deep Dive

3,287 words · generated 24/04/2026

What it does

The Pastoral Land Act 1992 is the principal statute governing the grant, administration, monitoring and conservation of pastoral land in the Northern Territory. At its core it establishes a specialised form of Crown leasehold tenure designed to support the sustainable commercial pasturing of stock while imposing positive duties to prevent degradation (s 6). The Act achieves this through a multi-layered scheme.

First, it authorises the Minister to grant pastoral leases over Crown land for pastoral purposes (s 31(1)). These leases may be perpetual or for a term not exceeding 25 years (s 48(1)). The Act contains detailed machinery for the initial grant (ss 32–37), including public notice, tender or auction processes, and a statutory maximum holding size of 13,000 km² (s 34(1)), enforced by statutory declaration requirements (s 35) and forfeiture mechanisms (s 35(7)–(12)).

Second, the Act imposes ongoing land-management obligations. Every pastoral lease is subject to implied conditions requiring the lessee to use the land only for pastoral purposes (s 38(1)(d)), to prevent degradation, to participate in monitoring, and to improve the land within financial and technical limits (s 6). The Pastoral Land Board is given express functions to monitor land condition, establish monitoring sites and reference areas, direct the preparation of remedial plans, and supervise rehabilitation (ss 29, 74–76). Part 7A, inserted in 2021, adds a strict permitting regime for clearing native vegetation: clearing is an offence unless done under a clearing permit or in accordance with permitted circumstances declared by Gazette notice (ss 91C–91D). Permits are time-limited, registrable, and subject to stop-work directions, rehabilitation directions and offences carrying 500 penalty units plus daily penalties (ss 91T–91ZB).

Third, the Act balances pastoral tenure with other interests. Part 6 creates statutory rights of public access to perennial natural waters and features of public interest (ss 79, 81), qualified by nominated access routes, temporary closures for management reasons (s 82) and closures for rehabilitation (s 83). Part 8 establishes a detailed procedure, including the Community Living Areas Tribunal, for Aboriginal persons with historical residential associations to obtain small excisions from pastoral leases for community living areas (ss 101–111). Part 7 allows the Board to grant non-pastoral use permits for activities that would otherwise breach the pastoral-purpose condition (ss 85A–89G), with public notification, assessment criteria and registration requirements.

Current sections

Direct links to the current provisions in Pastoral Land Act 1992.

180

Official source available

Zoe has indexed the source text for search and analysis. Use the official register for the original document and download formats.

View on official register

Sourced from NT Legislation (legislation.nt.gov.au), CC BY 4.0.

Stated purposes and checking the practical implications: The Act states objects such as enabling sustainable pastoral tenure, monitoring and rehabilitation, public access and recognition of Aboriginal traditional pursuits (s4). Mechanically, achieving those objects depends on: the Agency’s technical ECC determinations (s54), the Board’s regulatory exercise over permits and remedial plans (s29, s76), and the Minister’s exercise of broad discretion over leases, rent factors and forfeiture (s43, s55, s40). Those arrangements create several practical trade-offs:

Who pays: Pastoral lessees pay rent (s55–56), prescribed fees (s7), costs for surveys or registrations (s37), and may be charged for remedial work or Board-prepared plans (s42(2); s76(4)–(5)). Debts for these costs can be registered as charges on the land (s124). Mortgagees in possession are treated as lessees for obligations while in possession (s69).
Incentives and private choice: The rent formula (s55) links rent to ECC rather than market land value, creating an incentive to influence ECC determinations or to seek changes in PLRF declarations. Conditions, permit regimes (non-pastoral s85A; clearing s91F) and the duty to prevent degradation (s6) constrain lessee uses and set compliance tasks (record-keeping, remedial plans, permit applications).
Compliance burden and administrative load: Lessees may need to respond to notices, prepare remedial plans, support monitoring, apply for permits or extensions, comply with public-notice and registration requirements, and provide statutory declarations about holdings on demand (s35; s76; s91F; s85A; s61). Many actions require public notice and allow third-party submissions (s61(3), s87A(1)).
Bureaucratic discretion and implementation risk: The Minister and Board have broad discretionary powers (granting, variation, moratoria, forfeiture – see s31, s43, s46, s40). Key technical inputs (ECC) are agency determinations (s54). Discretion combined with technical determinations creates implementation risk (varying outcomes depending on how discretion and technical judgment are exercised).
Enforcement and legal risk: Forfeiture, stop-work and rehabilitation powers provide strong enforcement tools (s40, s91T, s91V) but also create risk that lessees face penalties or loss of lease; many decisions are subject to administrative review by NTCAT (s117) which limits but does not eliminate unilateral administrative action.

Who it affects

The Act’s reach is wide.

Pastoral lessees and their associates are the primary regulated class. A “pastoral lessee” is defined broadly to include transferees, mortgagees in possession, hold-over occupiers under s 50 arrangements, and sublessees (s 3). They bear the general duty in s 6, the lease conditions in ss 38–39, rent obligations (ss 55–59), monitoring and remedial responsibilities (Part 5), clearing controls (Part 7A) and restrictions on non-pastoral use without a permit (Part 7). Corporate lessees are caught by the associate and control tests in ss 30B(2) and 34(2), which aggregate holdings across related bodies corporate, trusts and directors.

The Minister holds ultimate decision-making power over grants (s 31), consent to lease transactions (s 68), forfeiture (ss 35, 40), rent remission for hardship (s 58), review of lease conditions (s 43), and acceptance or rejection of Tribunal recommendations on Aboriginal living areas (s 110). The Minister may delegate most powers (s 10) but not the power of delegation itself.

The Pastoral Land Board is the operational regulator. Comprising at least five members with pastoral and technical expertise (ss 12–13), it monitors land condition (s 29(c)), establishes monitoring sites and reference areas (ss 74–75), directs remedial plans (s 76), considers non-pastoral use permit and clearing permit applications (ss 87, 91H), issues guidelines (ss 91E, 85A(2)), and may declare uses not to be pastoral (s 91). The Board can delegate functions subject to Ministerial guidelines (s 24).

Aboriginal persons and Land Councils are both beneficiaries and participants. The statutory reservation in favour of Aboriginal inhabitants (s 38(1)(n)–(4)) preserves rights to enter, take water, hunt and gather, subject to homestead buffers. Part 8 provides a pathway for community living areas, with the relevant Land Council nominating Tribunal members and able to act as agent (s 100). Registered native title claimants and bodies corporate receive procedural rights under ss 72B–72D and 87(2A).

The public obtains qualified access rights under Part 6. These rights are enforceable against lessees (s 80) but do not extend to camping near homesteads, constructed waters or stock access points (s 79(7)).

Mortgagees, sublessees and successors in title are affected by registration requirements (ss 85B, 91L, 91Y), the binding effect of remedial and rehabilitation plans (ss 76(12), 91Z), and priority rules on forfeiture (s 53).

NTCAT reviews a long list of decisions listed in Schedule 2, including forfeiture decisions, estimated carrying capacity determinations, permit refusals or conditions, and Tribunal recommendations on living areas.

The Valuer-General and Surveyor-General perform valuation and survey functions that feed into purchase prices, rent and compensation for improvements (ss 33, 51, 121).

Key duties and rights

Duties of pastoral lessees are both general and specific. Section 6 imposes a tripartite duty: (a) to conduct the pastoral enterprise so as to prevent degradation; (b) to participate reasonably in environmental monitoring; and (c) to improve the land within financial and technical limits. These are reinforced by lease conditions (ss 38–39) requiring compliance with all Territory laws, no clearing without permit (s 38(1)(h)), maintenance of improvements, and preparation of remedial plans when directed (s 39(c)). Failure to implement an approved remedial plan is itself a breach of condition (s 76(9)).

Rights of pastoral lessees include the ability to surrender (s 60), apply for subdivision or consolidation (ss 61, 64), exchange land (s 66), seek extension of term (s 49), obtain non-pastoral use permits (s 86) or clearing permits (s 91F), and receive compensation for improvements on lease determination (s 51), subject to deductions (s 52).

Ministerial and Board powers are extensive but procedurally constrained. The Minister must seek Board recommendations before varying conditions (s 45) or forfeiting for breach (s 41). The Board must give public notice of non-pastoral and clearing applications (ss 87A, 91G), consider submissions, and provide procedural fairness (s 26 for lease applications; open meetings possible under s 87(3B)).

Aboriginal rights are twofold. The s 38(1)(n) reservation permits entry, use of natural waters, taking of fauna for food or ceremony, and taking of vegetable matter, but prohibits permanent structures except at ordinary places of residence. Part 8 adds a right to apply for excision of community living areas where historical residential association since 1968 can be shown (s 92 definition of “applicant”).

Public rights under Part 6 are statutory easements of a kind: access to perennial waters within 50 m (or prescribed distance), temporary camping, and access to declared features of public interest (ss 79, 81). These rights cannot be obstructed (s 80) and attract limited liability for the lessee equivalent to that owed to a trespasser (s 85).

Native title holders receive compensation for effects on registered native title rights and interests when extensions or new grants engage s 24MD(6B) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (s 72C). Claims must be made within three years (s 72C(2)).

Court challenges and controversies

The source text itself does not contain decided cases; however, the structure of the Act has generated several recurring legal issues evident on its face.

First, the breadth of the “associate” definition in s 34(2)(f) has attracted criticism for capturing common commercial structures. The 15 % and 50 % control thresholds in ss 30B(2) and 34(2)(c)–(e) create bright-line tests that can catch minority investors or unit trust holders. Disputes over whether a particular corporate restructure constitutes a “lease transaction” under s 30B are likely to be litigated, especially given the strict liability offence in s 67(2).

Second, the interaction with native title has produced procedural complexity. Sections 72A–72D attempt to apply the NTA future act regime via the Lands Acquisition Act 1978. The requirement that compensation claims be made within three years (s 72C(2)) and that NTCAT may only make recommendations on objections (s 72D) has been controversial among native title practitioners because it appears to limit judicial determination.

Third, the forfeiture power under ss 35 and 40 has been the subject of procedural challenge. The mandatory Board referral (s 41), the 28-day representation period (s 35(7)), and the NTCAT review right (Schedule 2 item 1) create a lengthy pathway. Mortgagees have additional 28-day and six-month sale windows (s 53). The statutory effect of Gazette forfeiture as equivalent to re-entry (s 123) has been used to shortcut title disputes.

Fourth, the 2021 clearing regime has already generated debate around the breadth of “clear” (s 91A) and the presumption of abandonment if clearing is not completed in time (s 91J(4)). The strict liability offence in s 91C(2) combined with a reasonable excuse defence (s 91C(3)) places the onus on the defendant to prove excuse once the prosecution establishes the physical elements.

Controversies also surround reference areas (s 74). The 1 km² limit and fencing requirements have led to disputes over whether a lessee must maintain fences (s 74(4) says no, unless agreed) and the heavy penalties for allowing stock entry (440 penalty units, s 74(5)).

Gotchas

Most practitioners miss several subtle but high-stakes provisions.

Corporate control changes are lease transactions — a shift of 15 % or more of voting power or board control in a corporate lessee is deemed a transfer (s 30B(2)). This catches many farm succession or investment deals. Consent must be obtained before the transaction; otherwise a strict liability offence is committed (s 67).
Remedial and rehabilitation plans bind successors and mortgagees in possession — registration on title makes them enforceable against future owners even if the plan was prepared by a previous lessee (ss 76(12), 91Z). A purchaser who fails to check the register can inherit expensive obligations.
The 13,000 km² limit is calculated on an aggregated “worked in association” basis — s 34(1)(f) catches land that is operated as one station even if titles are in different names. The associate definition (s 34(2)(f)) is extraordinarily wide, including lineal relatives, de facto partners, trustees, partners within two years, and corporations controlled by the same persons.
Non-pastoral use permits and clearing permits survive lease expiry in certain cases — if a term lease expires and is replaced by a perpetual lease, the permits continue (ss 89(2), 91K(3)). However, if the permit is revoked, the lessee must rehabilitate under s 89G directions or face 500 penalty units plus daily penalties.
Aboriginal access rights cannot be extinguished by private agreement — the reservation in s 38(1)(n) is a statutory overlay. Interference remains an offence of strict liability (s 38(5)–(7)) even if the lessee and the Aboriginal persons have reached a side deal.
Interest on unpaid rent compounds quarterly and forms part of the rent for surrender purposes (s 57(3)). A lessee wishing to surrender under s 60 must pay all accrued interest.
The Board can declare a use non-pastoral by Gazette notice (s 91). Once declared, the lessee must either obtain a non-pastoral use permit or surrender the affected land (s 90(2)). This is a unilateral power that can force a change of tenure.
NTCAT review is confined to objection grounds on valuation matters (s 117(5)). An objector who raises new material before NTCAT may be precluded.

How to comply

Compliance begins with due diligence before acquisition. A purchaser should:

Obtain a current estimated carrying capacity determination and any remedial plans registered on title (ss 54, 76(11), 91Y).
Verify that the vendor’s holdings, including associates, do not exceed 13,000 km² (s 34). Require statutory declarations under s 35(5)–(5A).
Confirm all rent, interest and debts are paid; unpaid amounts become overriding statutory charges (s 124).
Inspect the register for non-pastoral use permits, clearing permits and rehabilitation plans that will bind the purchaser.

Ongoing compliance requires a land-management system that:

Keeps stocking rates within the estimated carrying capacity (s 55).
Maintains a register of monitoring data and provides it to the Board on request (s 30(2)(b)).
Prepares and implements remedial plans when directed (s 76).
Applies for clearing permits before any substantial damage to native vegetation (s 91C). Keep records to prove the clearing was permitted under s 91D if no permit is held.
Applies for non-pastoral use permits before commencing tourism, horticulture or other non-dominant activities (s 86). Ensure the use does not become dominant (s 89B(1)(c)(i)).
Allows Board access for monitoring and reference area maintenance (ss 9, 30(2), 74(5)).
Does not obstruct public access routes or lock gates without Board approval (s 80).
Respects the statutory Aboriginal reservation and does not interfere with hunting, gathering or water rights except within the 2 km homestead buffer (s 38(2)–(4)).

For lease transactions, obtain Ministerial consent before signing (s 68). Lodge transaction details with the Registrar-General promptly (s 68(6)–(9)).

If a breach notice is received under s 40(1) or a remedial direction under s 76, respond within time and consider seeking a moratorium (s 46). Forfeiture decisions are reviewable by NTCAT within 28 days (s 117(4), Schedule 2).

Aboriginal community living area applications should be prepared with supporting historical evidence (s 102) and served on the lessee (s 103). If referred to the Tribunal, participate in compulsory conferences (s 107).

Annual compliance tasks include paying rent by the quarterly due dates shown on the Minister’s notice (s 56), lodging any variations of permits or plans for registration, and monitoring for new Board guidelines on clearing or non-pastoral use (ss 85A(2), 91E).

In short, compliance is not a set-and-forget exercise. It requires integrated land-condition monitoring, accurate corporate control records, proactive permit applications, and prompt engagement with the Board and Minister when issues arise. Failure at any point can trigger cascading enforcement from daily penalties through to outright forfeiture of the lease.