//
© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the official source for authoritative text.
Victoria act
**What this law does (mechanically)
Creates the legal framework for the EastLink toll road project and empowers the State to enter a written Agreement with a private operator (the Freeway Corporation) covering the design, construction, financing, operation, maintenance and management of EastLink (ss 1, 15–16).
Gives the Head, Transport for Victoria (the Authority) and the Minister specific functions and powers to manage the State's role in the Project, including delegations and directions (ss 4A, 12–13).
Authorises compulsory acquisition and purchase of land within a defined Project area and an Extended Project area, including processes for native title acquisition and compensation (Parts 3 and 4; ss 34–54, 47–52).
Enables the State and the Freeway Corporation to create leases and licences over Crown land for the Project, and to decide what land is reserved, revoked or declared roads (Parts 4–5; ss 55–66, 89–111, 143–145).
Confers broad construction and road-management powers to the Authority and (for specified roads) to the Freeway Corporation, including temporary closures and road realignments needed for construction and operation (Part 7; ss 133–141).
Sets up a comprehensive tolling regime: the Freeway Corporation may fix and collect tolls, create toll zones, register vehicles, issue requests for payment and recover unpaid tolls; it may also authorise persons to act on its behalf (Part 9; ss 194–206B, 222).
Want the full deep dive?
Zoe can write the in-depth analysis on top of the summary above: how it works, who it affects and what each part actually does.
Direct links to the current provisions in EastLink Project Act 2004.
Zoe has indexed the source text for search and analysis. Use the official register for the original document and download formats.
View on official registerSourced from Victorian Legislation (legislation.vic.gov.au), CC BY 4.0.
Establishes offences and enforcement tools related to tolling (e.g. driving an unregistered vehicle in a toll zone), civil debt recovery and infringement procedures, and evidentiary certificates for enforcement (Part 9; ss 204, 206B, 220–222).
Regulates the interface with Utilities (electricity, telecommunications, rail etc.): identification, notice, agreement and, where required, ministerial directions to relocate, preserve or certify utility infrastructure; sets who pays relocation/rectification costs and provides dispute-resolution by Ministers (Part 8; ss 150–179, 189–193).
Provides a suite of statutory overrides and exemptions for the Project: works on licensed/leased land may be exempt from some planning, building and other statutory approvals, and certain Acts are modified in application to Project land (Parts 5–6; ss 126, 128–131, 129).
Authorises data sharing for toll recovery and enforcement between the Transport Secretary, the Freeway Corporation and enforcement agencies, and obliges record-keeping and destruction rules (ss 223–225).
Grants emergency powers (Independent Reviewer and Minister) to stop works, evacuate sites, or close EastLink for safety, with criminal penalties for non-compliance (ss 231–237, 147).
Limits judicial review of a narrow class of administrative decisions under the Utilities interface and emergency orders (s 193, s 236).
Who is affected
Private operator (Freeway Corporation/Concessionaire, currently named in the Act) — receives rights to operate, collect tolls, and manage specified roads; also carries liabilities for utility relocations and some construction obligations (ss 10, 194, 178–181).
The State (Minister, Head, Transport for Victoria) — retains decision-making powers, can enter/amend the Agreement, direct authorities and order compulsory acquisition; may assume control of the Project under the Agreement (ss 15–17, 24–26, 240).
Landowners, occupiers and Councils — face potential compulsory acquisition, surrender/divesting of land, temporary occupation, eviction processes, and limited compensation rights (Parts 3–4, Divs 4–5; ss 34–46, 67–79).
Utilities (electricity, water, telecommunications, rail, public transport providers) — must identify affected infrastructure, obtain or give consents, enter Utility agreements, and accept directions; they may be liable for some costs where they request higher standards or fail to notify infrastructure (Part 8; ss 150–179, 182).
Road users and vehicle operators — subject to tolls, registration requirements, penalty regimes for non-payment or unregistered use, and evidentiary rules that facilitate civil recovery and enforcement (Part 9; ss 194–206, 220–222).
Enforcement agencies and courts — given roles in serving notices, prosecuting offences, and enforcing infringement penalties; procedures cross‑link with the Infringements Act and Fines Reform Act (ss 207–219, 218).
Why it matters (purpose-claims and a quick policy test)
Official purpose-claims: the Act says it exists to enable the State to enter an Agreement to build and operate EastLink, collect and enforce tolls, manage land and the interface with Utilities, and to confer powers needed to deliver the Project (s 1).
Testing those claims against incentives, costs and trade-offs:
Who pays and who benefits (concentrated vs diffuse): the Freeway Corporation is empowered to collect toll revenue (s 194–195) and may obtain long-term rights over leased/licensed land (ss 90, 103). Private operator benefits (concentrated) are funded by road users (diffuse). The State appropriates its payment obligations to the Consolidated Fund (s 26), and the Agreement may include State payments or guarantees (ss 15–16, 31A).
Transfer of private property and compensation costs: the Authority can compulsorily acquire land (s 34) including native title rights (ss 47–52); compensation rules are provided but modified in several ways (ss 35, 41, 79). Acquisition shifts costs onto the public purse and creates administrative and litigation risk (Tribunal referrals for native title, ss 49–51).
Regulatory burden and compliance costs: Utilities must identify infrastructure, consent processes apply and the Freeway Corporation bears relocation costs (ss 159–166, 178). Utilities that fail to notify can be liable for delay costs (s 182). These provisions create compliance and administrative burden for utilities and contractual exposure for the Freeway Corporation.
Limits on local control and planning: the Act removes or limits application of planning, building and local laws on licensed/leased land (ss 126, 128, 129, 230). That reduces transaction costs for project delivery but concentrates discretion with Ministers, the Authority and the Freeway Corporation.
Market effects and competition: long-term leases, exemptions from some statutory regimes, and the ability to set tolls and vehicle registration terms (ss 103, 195, 205A) give the concessionaire significant control over pricing and access. The Act permits roaming arrangements with other toll operators but caps roaming fees to incremental marginal cost (ss 225A–225D), which constrains cross-operator pricing.
Accountability and review risks: key dispute or direction outcomes under the Utilities interface and emergency orders are final and not subject to judicial review (ss 193, 236). That reduces legal delay risk for project delivery but raises implementation risk and constrains legal remedies for affected parties.
Data and privacy trade-offs: the Act authorises disclosure of vehicle and driver licence information for toll recovery (ss 223, 223A) and requires record destruction timeframes (s 225). This supports enforcement but creates privacy compliance obligations and reliance on inter-agency data arrangements.
Concrete behavioural effects
Landowners: must engage in compensation processes or face compulsory acquisition; may be required to accept adjoining land in part‑settlement (ss 34, 44–45, 79–82).
Utilities: must improve mapping/notification systems and engage in agreements or risk ministerial directions and liability for some costs (ss 159–166, 169–176, 178–184).
Motorists and fleet operators: will decide whether to use EastLink based on toll levels and billing arrangements; operators can be held liable for unpaid tolls absent effective nomination statements (ss 197–200, 199–199A).
Freeway Corporation: able to set tolling systems, recover fees, enter roaming agreements and rely on statutory evidentiary certificates; must manage relocation costs and compliance obligations (ss 194–225D, 178–186).
Implementation and administrative risks
Complexity of cross-Act interactions (Land Acquisition Act, Native Title Act, Road Management Act, Road Safety Act, Planning Act) increases scope for disputes and procedural error (multiple cross-references throughout Parts 3–9).
Ministerial discretion and non-reviewable decisions speed implementation but concentrate political and bureaucratic risk; affected parties have limited judicial remedies for certain decisions (ss 193, 236).
Operational risk for the Freeway Corporation from utility unknowns (unnotified infrastructure) and strict standards for rectification (ss 169–176, 179).
Key sections cited: purposes (s 1); Agreement powers and operation (ss 15–33); acquisition and compensation (ss 34–54, 79); utilities interface and liability (ss 150–179); tolling, registration and enforcement (Part 9: ss 194–225D); data sharing (ss 223–224); limits on review and emergency powers (ss 193, 231–237).