Licensees, bore owners and applicants. The plan directly affects holders and applicants for water licences, water permits and seasonal water assignment notices whose activities are in the plan area. It changes the default content of water licences (a volumetric limit must be stated, s 44), requires amendments to some licences to include infrastructure and reporting conditions (s 33, s 50), and affects eligibility and processes to obtain new licences from unallocated reserves (s 19, s 24, s 53-s 55). Bore owners who use bores for stock, domestic, commercial, cultural or prescribed activities face new operational obligations: installation of watertight delivery systems or controlled bore works, measuring devices where saved water claims are sought, and obligations to notify the chief executive if a bore is not controlled (s 29-s 39, s 51-s 55, s 65-s 67).
Existing authorised users. Persons with existing statutory authorisations or pre‑commencement uses are affected through transitional provisions. The plan authorises continued use for certain existing bores and prescribed activities (s 65-s 67), but those authorisations may end if a water licence is later granted for the bore or activity (s 65(3), s 66(3), s 67(3)). Existing licence holders must comply with amendments (for example, conditions requiring watertight delivery systems) and timeframes for giving bore management statements or installation notices (s 33-s 34, s 39).
Communities and cultural stakeholders. The plan includes specific recognition of cultural and social uses, for example directing that unallocated water in the Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islanders economic reserve be granted to help Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders achieve economic aspirations (s 17(4)). It also allows exceptions and special licence amendments to enable water to sustain culturally or environmentally significant values where those values existed on commencement (s 48-s 50). Local governments applying for town water supply in the Surat Basin have dedicated allocation pools and processes (s 69).
Project proponents and infrastructure developers. The State reserve is reserved for certain project types,coordinated projects, projects of regional significance, town water supply for local government and electricity generation (s 17(2)). The plan allows water from the State reserve for such projects only for the life of the project (s 20). The plan also creates a mechanism to grant saved water licences to those who install required bore works, creating an economic incentive structure for infrastructure investment (s 51-s 55).
Cross‑border interests. Where a proposed decision could adversely affect groundwater pressure at Queensland’s border with another State, the chief executive must consult the other State and consider any information it provides (s 47). This injects an inter‑jurisdictional consultation obligation into licence decisionmaking where border effects are possible.
Regulator and department. The department and the chief executive are the administrative actors responsible for preparing the water management protocol, maintaining spatial boundaries, deciding volumetric limits, imposing and amending licence conditions, cancelling licences under specified conditions, and publishing notices about installation deadlines and changes (s 11, s 33, s 35, s 58). The plan gives the chief executive both prescriptive duties and broad discretion to require studies, impose conditions and, in limited cases, relax installation deadlines (s 23, s 24, s 35).
Indirect economic actors. Agricultural operators, water traders and market participants will be affected by volumetric limits on licences, the plan’s emphasis on water use efficiency, and restrictions on the release of unallocated water (s 12, s 44-s 45, s 19). The requirement that licences state volumetric limits and the encouragement of water markets are explicit policy aims (s 12). Where licences are tied to physical retrofit (watertight delivery systems) and measuring devices, transactions will be linked to infrastructure investment (s 29, s 54).
Who pays. The plan’s compliance costs fall predominantly on licence holders, bore owners and applicants. Costs include installing watertight delivery systems or permanent headworks, maintaining bores/pipelines/troughs to minimise losses, commissioning investigations, studies and hydrogeological assessments when required, installing measuring devices where saved water claims are made, and providing monitoring reports (s 24, s 29, s 33, s 34, s 54). The chief executive may consider available financial assistance programs when deciding whether to extend installation deadlines, but the plan does not guarantee funding (s 35).