The Human Rights Act 2019 requires public entities (including government bodies and some contracted providers) to consider and act compatibly with a listed set of human rights, creates pre‑legislative compatibility statements and parliamentary scrutiny, and establishes the Queensland Human Rights Commission complaints, conciliation and reporting system. Courts must interpret laws compatibly where possible and can declare incompatibility, while Parliament can exceptionally override rights.
It matters because it shifts enforcement toward administrative remedies, oversight and political remedies rather than damages, raising compliance costs for public actors and changing decision‑making incentives.
The Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld) (the Act) establishes a comprehensive human rights framework for Queensland that operates at three levels: legislative scrutiny, public entity obligations, and individual complaints resolution. At its core, s 3 states the main objects as protecting and promoting human rights, building a culture of respect within the Queensland public sector, and fostering dialogue about the nature, meaning and scope of those rights. These objects are achieved primarily through the mechanisms detailed in s 4.
Part 2 is the substantive heart of the Act. It declares that all individuals in Queensland have the human rights listed in Divisions 2 and 3 (s 7 and s 11). These rights are explicitly additional to, and do not abrogate, rights existing under the Commonwealth Constitution, Commonwealth or common law, the ICCPR, the UDHR or other international instruments (s 12). The Act adopts a structured limitation clause in s 13 modelled on the ICCPR and the Victorian Charter: a human right may be limited only if the limit is reasonable and demonstrably justifiable in a free and democratic society based on human dignity, equality and freedom. Section 13(2) supplies seven non-exhaustive factors for assessing reasonableness and justifiability, including the nature of the right, the importance of the limiting purpose, whether less restrictive means are available, and the balance between the limiting purpose and the right.
The Act then applies these rights to government action. Section 58(1) makes it unlawful for a public entity to act or make a decision in a way that is not compatible with human rights, or to fail to give proper consideration to a relevant human right in decision-making. "Compatible with human rights" is defined in s 8 as either not limiting a right or limiting it only to the extent that is reasonable and demonstrably justifiable under s 13. "Proper consideration" is elaborated in s 58(5) as including identification of affected rights and assessment of compatibility. Important carve-outs exist: the obligation does not apply where the entity could not reasonably have acted differently because of another statutory provision or law (s 58(2)), where the act is of a private nature (s 58(4)), or where a religious body acts in accordance with its doctrine to avoid offending religious sensitivities (s 58(3)).
Current sections
Direct links to the current provisions in Human Rights Act 2019.
126
pt.1
Preliminary
Preliminary
pt.1-div.1
Introduction
Introduction
sec.1
Short title
sec.1 Short title
This Act may be cited as the Human Rights Act 2019 .
sec.2
Commencement
sec.2 Commencement
This Act commences on a day to be fixed by proclamation.
sec.3
Main objects of Act
sec.3 Main objects of Act
The main objects of this Act are—
to protect and promote human rights; and
to help build a culture in the Queensland public sector that respects and promotes human rights; and
to help promote a dialogue about the nature, meaning and scope of human rights.
(a) to protect and promote human rights; and
(b) to help build a culture in the Queensland public sector that respects and promotes human rights; and
(c) to help promote a dialogue about the nature, meaning and scope of human rights.
sec.4
How main objects are primarily achieved
sec.4 How main objects are primarily achieved
The main objects are to be achieved primarily by—
stating the human rights Parliament specifically seeks to protect and promote; and
requiring public entities to act and make decisions in a way compatible with human rights; and
requiring statements of compatibility with human rights to be tabled in the Legislative Assembly for all Bills introduced in the Assembly; and
providing for a portfolio committee responsible for examining a Bill introduced in the Legislative Assembly to consider whether the Bill is compatible with human rights; and
providing for Parliament, in exceptional circumstances, to override the application of this Act to a statutory provision; and
requiring courts and tribunals to interpret statutory provisions, to the extent possible that is consistent with their purpose, in a way compatible with human rights; and
conferring jurisdiction on the Supreme Court to declare that a statutory provision can not be interpreted in a way compatible with human rights; and
providing for a Minister and a portfolio committee to report to the Legislative Assembly about declarations of incompatibility; and
providing for how to resolve human rights complaints; and
providing for the Queensland Human Rights Commission to carry out particular functions under this Act, including, for example, to promote an understanding and acceptance of human rights and this Act in Queensland.
(a) stating the human rights Parliament specifically seeks to protect and promote; and
(b) requiring public entities to act and make decisions in a way compatible with human rights; and
(c) requiring statements of compatibility with human rights to be tabled in the Legislative Assembly for all Bills introduced in the Assembly; and
(d) providing for a portfolio committee responsible for examining a Bill introduced in the Legislative Assembly to consider whether the Bill is compatible with human rights; and
(e) providing for Parliament, in exceptional circumstances, to override the application of this Act to a statutory provision; and
(f) requiring courts and tribunals to interpret statutory provisions, to the extent possible that is consistent with their purpose, in a way compatible with human rights; and
(g) conferring jurisdiction on the Supreme Court to declare that a statutory provision can not be interpreted in a way compatible with human rights; and
(h) providing for a Minister and a portfolio committee to report to the Legislative Assembly about declarations of incompatibility; and
(i) providing for how to resolve human rights complaints; and
(j) providing for the Queensland Human Rights Commission to carry out particular functions under this Act, including, for example, to promote an understanding and acceptance of human rights and this Act in Queensland.
sec.5
Act binds all persons
sec.5 Act binds all persons
This Act binds all persons, including the State and, to the extent the legislative power of the Parliament permits, the Commonwealth and the other States.
This Act applies to—
a court or tribunal, to the extent the court or tribunal has functions under part 2 and part 3 , division 3 ; and
the Parliament, to the extent the Parliament has functions under part 3 , divisions 1 , 2 and 3 ; and
a public entity, to the extent the public entity has functions under part 3 , division 4 .
Subsection (2) does not limit or otherwise affect—
another function conferred by this Act on an entity mentioned in the subsection; or
a function conferred by this Act on any other entity.
Nothing in this Act makes the State liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
(sec.5-ssec.1) This Act binds all persons, including the State and, to the extent the legislative power of the Parliament permits, the Commonwealth and the other States.
(sec.5-ssec.2) This Act applies to— a court or tribunal, to the extent the court or tribunal has functions under part 2 and part 3 , division 3 ; and the Parliament, to the extent the Parliament has functions under part 3 , divisions 1 , 2 and 3 ; and a public entity, to the extent the public entity has functions under part 3 , division 4 .
(sec.5-ssec.3) Subsection (2) does not limit or otherwise affect— another function conferred by this Act on an entity mentioned in the subsection; or a function conferred by this Act on any other entity.
(sec.5-ssec.4) Nothing in this Act makes the State liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
(a) a court or tribunal, to the extent the court or tribunal has functions under part 2 and part 3 , division 3 ; and
(b) the Parliament, to the extent the Parliament has functions under part 3 , divisions 1 , 2 and 3 ; and
(c) a public entity, to the extent the public entity has functions under part 3 , division 4 .
(a) another function conferred by this Act on an entity mentioned in the subsection; or
(b) a function conferred by this Act on any other entity.
pt.1-div.2
Interpretation
Interpretation
sec.6
Definitions
sec.6 Definitions
The dictionary in schedule 1 defines particular words used in this Act.
sec.7
Meaning of human rights
sec.7 Meaning of human rights
Human rights means the rights stated in part 2 , divisions 2 and 3 .
sec.8
Meaning of compatible with human rights
sec.8 Meaning of compatible with human rights
An act, decision or statutory provision is compatible with human rights if the act, decision or provision—
does not limit a human right; or
limits a human right only to the extent that is reasonable and demonstrably justifiable in accordance with section 13 .
(a) does not limit a human right; or
(b) limits a human right only to the extent that is reasonable and demonstrably justifiable in accordance with section 13 .
sec.9
Meaning of public entity
sec.9 Meaning of public entity
Each of the following entities is a public entity —
a government entity within the meaning of the Public Sector Act 2022 , section 276 ;
a public service employee;
the Queensland Police Service;
a local government, a councillor of a local government or a local government employee;
a Minister;
an entity established under an Act when the entity is performing functions of a public nature;
a member of a portfolio committee when the committee is acting in an administrative capacity;
an entity whose functions are, or include, functions of a public nature when it is performing the functions for the State or a public entity (whether under contract or otherwise);
A non-State school is not a public entity merely because it performs functions of a public nature in educating students because it is not doing so for the State.
a person, not otherwise mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (h) , who is a staff member or executive officer (however called) of a public entity;
an entity prescribed by regulation to be a public entity.
A public entity includes—
a registered provider when the provider is performing functions of a public nature in the State; and
a non-State police officer, under the Police Service Administration Act 1990 , section 5.17 , while the officer—
is appointed as a special constable under section 5.16 (1) of that Act; or
is authorised under section 5.17 (2) of that Act to exercise the powers of a police officer; or
is exercising a power under another law of the State.
Also, a public entity includes an entity for which a declaration is in force under section 60 .
However, a public entity does not include—
the Legislative Assembly or a person performing functions in connection with proceedings in the Assembly, except when acting in an administrative capacity; or
a court or tribunal, except when acting in an administrative capacity; or
an entity prescribed by regulation not to be a public entity.
In this section—
entity means an entity in and for Queensland.
registered provider means a registered provider of supports or a registered NDIS provider under the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cwlth) .
s 9 amd 2022 No. 34 s 365 sch 3
(sec.9-ssec.1) Each of the following entities is a public entity — a government entity within the meaning of the Public Sector Act 2022 , section 276 ; a public service employee; the Queensland Police Service; a local government, a councillor of a local government or a local government employee; a Minister; an entity established under an Act when the entity is performing functions of a public nature; a member of a portfolio committee when the committee is acting in an administrative capacity; an entity whose functions are, or include, functions of a public nature when it is performing the functions for the State or a public entity (whether under contract or otherwise); A non-State school is not a public entity merely because it performs functions of a public nature in educating students because it is not doing so for the State. a person, not otherwise mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (h) , who is a staff member or executive officer (however called) of a public entity; an entity prescribed by regulation to be a public entity.
(sec.9-ssec.2) A public entity includes— a registered provider when the provider is performing functions of a public nature in the State; and a non-State police officer, under the Police Service Administration Act 1990 , section 5.17 , while the officer— is appointed as a special constable under section 5.16 (1) of that Act; or is authorised under section 5.17 (2) of that Act to exercise the powers of a police officer; or is exercising a power under another law of the State.
(sec.9-ssec.3) Also, a public entity includes an entity for which a declaration is in force under section 60 .
(sec.9-ssec.4) However, a public entity does not include— the Legislative Assembly or a person performing functions in connection with proceedings in the Assembly, except when acting in an administrative capacity; or a court or tribunal, except when acting in an administrative capacity; or an entity prescribed by regulation not to be a public entity.
(sec.9-ssec.5) In this section— entity means an entity in and for Queensland. registered provider means a registered provider of supports or a registered NDIS provider under the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cwlth) .
(a) a government entity within the meaning of the Public Sector Act 2022 , section 276 ;
(b) a public service employee;
(c) the Queensland Police Service;
(d) a local government, a councillor of a local government or a local government employee;
(e) a Minister;
(f) an entity established under an Act when the entity is performing functions of a public nature;
(g) a member of a portfolio committee when the committee is acting in an administrative capacity;
(h) an entity whose functions are, or include, functions of a public nature when it is performing the functions for the State or a public entity (whether under contract or otherwise); Example of an entity not performing functions of a public nature for the State— A non-State school is not a public entity merely because it performs functions of a public nature in educating students because it is not doing so for the State.
(i) a person, not otherwise mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (h) , who is a staff member or executive officer (however called) of a public entity;
(j) an entity prescribed by regulation to be a public entity.
(a) a registered provider when the provider is performing functions of a public nature in the State; and
(b) a non-State police officer, under the Police Service Administration Act 1990 , section 5.17 , while the officer— (i) is appointed as a special constable under section 5.16 (1) of that Act; or (ii) is authorised under section 5.17 (2) of that Act to exercise the powers of a police officer; or (iii) is exercising a power under another law of the State.
(i) is appointed as a special constable under section 5.16 (1) of that Act; or
(ii) is authorised under section 5.17 (2) of that Act to exercise the powers of a police officer; or
(iii) is exercising a power under another law of the State.
(i) is appointed as a special constable under section 5.16 (1) of that Act; or
(ii) is authorised under section 5.17 (2) of that Act to exercise the powers of a police officer; or
(iii) is exercising a power under another law of the State.
(a) the Legislative Assembly or a person performing functions in connection with proceedings in the Assembly, except when acting in an administrative capacity; or
(b) a court or tribunal, except when acting in an administrative capacity; or
(c) an entity prescribed by regulation not to be a public entity.
sec.10
When function is of a public nature
sec.10 When function is of a public nature
In deciding whether a function of an entity is of a public nature for this Act, any of the following matters may be considered—
whether the function is conferred on the entity under a statutory provision;
whether the function is connected to or generally identified with functions of government;
whether the function is of a regulatory nature;
whether the entity is publicly funded to perform the function;
whether the entity is a government owned corporation.
Subsection (1) does not limit the matters that may be considered in deciding whether a function is of a public nature.
Without limiting subsection (1) or (2) , the following functions are of a public nature—
the operation of a corrective services facility under the Corrective Services Act 2006 or another place of detention;
the provision of any of the following—
emergency services;
public health services;
public disability services;
public education, including public tertiary education and public vocational education;
public transport;
a housing service by a funded provider or the State under the Housing Act 2003 .
(sec.10-ssec.1) In deciding whether a function of an entity is of a public nature for this Act, any of the following matters may be considered— whether the function is conferred on the entity under a statutory provision; whether the function is connected to or generally identified with functions of government; whether the function is of a regulatory nature; whether the entity is publicly funded to perform the function; whether the entity is a government owned corporation.
(sec.10-ssec.2) Subsection (1) does not limit the matters that may be considered in deciding whether a function is of a public nature.
(sec.10-ssec.3) Without limiting subsection (1) or (2) , the following functions are of a public nature— the operation of a corrective services facility under the Corrective Services Act 2006 or another place of detention; the provision of any of the following— emergency services; public health services; public disability services; public education, including public tertiary education and public vocational education; public transport; a housing service by a funded provider or the State under the Housing Act 2003 .
(a) whether the function is conferred on the entity under a statutory provision;
(b) whether the function is connected to or generally identified with functions of government;
(c) whether the function is of a regulatory nature;
(d) whether the entity is publicly funded to perform the function;
(e) whether the entity is a government owned corporation.
(a) the operation of a corrective services facility under the Corrective Services Act 2006 or another place of detention;
(b) the provision of any of the following— (i) emergency services; (ii) public health services; (iii) public disability services; (iv) public education, including public tertiary education and public vocational education; (v) public transport; (vi) a housing service by a funded provider or the State under the Housing Act 2003 .
(i) emergency services;
(ii) public health services;
(iii) public disability services;
(iv) public education, including public tertiary education and public vocational education;
(v) public transport;
(vi) a housing service by a funded provider or the State under the Housing Act 2003 .
(i) emergency services;
(ii) public health services;
(iii) public disability services;
(iv) public education, including public tertiary education and public vocational education;
(v) public transport;
(vi) a housing service by a funded provider or the State under the Housing Act 2003 .
pt.2
Human rights in Queensland
Human rights in Queensland
pt.2-div.1
Preliminary
Preliminary
sec.11
Who has human rights
sec.11 Who has human rights
All individuals in Queensland have human rights.
Only individuals have human rights.
A corporation does not have human rights.
(sec.11-ssec.1) All individuals in Queensland have human rights.
(sec.11-ssec.2) Only individuals have human rights. A corporation does not have human rights.
sec.12
Human rights are in addition to other rights and freedoms
sec.12 Human rights are in addition to other rights and freedoms
A right or freedom not included, or only partly included, in this Act that arises or is recognised under another law must not be taken to be abrogated or limited only because the right or freedom is not included in this Act or is only partly included.
the Commonwealth Constitution
a law of the Commonwealth
the common law
rights under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights not stated in this Act
rights under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights not stated in this Act
rights under other international conventions
other international laws
• the Commonwealth Constitution
• a law of the Commonwealth
• the common law
• rights under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights not stated in this Act
• rights under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights not stated in this Act
• rights under other international conventions
• other international laws
sec.13
Human rights may be limited
sec.13 Human rights may be limited
A human right may be subject under law only to reasonable limits that can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society based on human dignity, equality and freedom.
In deciding whether a limit on a human right is reasonable and justifiable as mentioned in subsection (1) , the following factors may be relevant—
the nature of the human right;
the nature of the purpose of the limitation, including whether it is consistent with a free and democratic society based on human dignity, equality and freedom;
the relationship between the limitation and its purpose, including whether the limitation helps to achieve the purpose;
whether there are any less restrictive and reasonably available ways to achieve the purpose;
the importance of the purpose of the limitation;
the importance of preserving the human right, taking into account the nature and extent of the limitation on the human right;
the balance between the matters mentioned in paragraphs (e) and (f) .
(sec.13-ssec.1) A human right may be subject under law only to reasonable limits that can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society based on human dignity, equality and freedom.
(sec.13-ssec.2) In deciding whether a limit on a human right is reasonable and justifiable as mentioned in subsection (1) , the following factors may be relevant— the nature of the human right; the nature of the purpose of the limitation, including whether it is consistent with a free and democratic society based on human dignity, equality and freedom; the relationship between the limitation and its purpose, including whether the limitation helps to achieve the purpose; whether there are any less restrictive and reasonably available ways to achieve the purpose; the importance of the purpose of the limitation; the importance of preserving the human right, taking into account the nature and extent of the limitation on the human right; the balance between the matters mentioned in paragraphs (e) and (f) .
(a) the nature of the human right;
(b) the nature of the purpose of the limitation, including whether it is consistent with a free and democratic society based on human dignity, equality and freedom;
(c) the relationship between the limitation and its purpose, including whether the limitation helps to achieve the purpose;
(d) whether there are any less restrictive and reasonably available ways to achieve the purpose;
(e) the importance of the purpose of the limitation;
(f) the importance of preserving the human right, taking into account the nature and extent of the limitation on the human right;
(g) the balance between the matters mentioned in paragraphs (e) and (f) .
sec.14
Human rights are protected
sec.14 Human rights are protected
Nothing in this Act gives any person or other entity a right to limit to a greater extent than is provided for under this Act, or destroy, a human right of any person.
pt.2-div.2
Civil and political rights
Civil and political rights
sec.15
Recognition and equality before the law
sec.15 Recognition and equality before the law
Every person has the right to recognition as a person before the law.
Every person has the right to enjoy the person’s human rights without discrimination.
Every person is equal before the law and is entitled to the equal protection of the law without discrimination.
Every person has the right to equal and effective protection against discrimination.
Measures taken for the purpose of assisting or advancing persons or groups of persons disadvantaged because of discrimination do not constitute discrimination.
(sec.15-ssec.1) Every person has the right to recognition as a person before the law.
(sec.15-ssec.2) Every person has the right to enjoy the person’s human rights without discrimination.
(sec.15-ssec.3) Every person is equal before the law and is entitled to the equal protection of the law without discrimination.
(sec.15-ssec.4) Every person has the right to equal and effective protection against discrimination.
(sec.15-ssec.5) Measures taken for the purpose of assisting or advancing persons or groups of persons disadvantaged because of discrimination do not constitute discrimination.
sec.16
Right to life
sec.16 Right to life
Every person has the right to life and has the right not to be arbitrarily deprived of life.
sec.17
Protection from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment
sec.17 Protection from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment
A person must not be—
subjected to torture; or
treated or punished in a cruel, inhuman or degrading way; or
subjected to medical or scientific experimentation or treatment without the person’s full, free and informed consent.
(a) subjected to torture; or
(b) treated or punished in a cruel, inhuman or degrading way; or
(c) subjected to medical or scientific experimentation or treatment without the person’s full, free and informed consent.
sec.18
Freedom from forced work
sec.18 Freedom from forced work
A person must not be held in slavery or servitude.
A person must not be made to perform forced or compulsory labour.
In this section—
court order includes an order made by a court of another jurisdiction.
forced or compulsory labour does not include—
work or service normally required of a person who is under detention because of a lawful court order or who, under a lawful court order, has been conditionally released from detention or ordered to perform work in the community; or
work or service performed under a work and development order under the State Penalties Enforcement Act 1999 ; or
work or service required because of an emergency threatening the Queensland community or a part of the Queensland community; or
work or service that forms part of normal civil obligations.
(sec.18-ssec.1) A person must not be held in slavery or servitude.
(sec.18-ssec.2) A person must not be made to perform forced or compulsory labour.
(sec.18-ssec.3) In this section— court order includes an order made by a court of another jurisdiction. forced or compulsory labour does not include— work or service normally required of a person who is under detention because of a lawful court order or who, under a lawful court order, has been conditionally released from detention or ordered to perform work in the community; or work or service performed under a work and development order under the State Penalties Enforcement Act 1999 ; or work or service required because of an emergency threatening the Queensland community or a part of the Queensland community; or work or service that forms part of normal civil obligations.
(a) work or service normally required of a person who is under detention because of a lawful court order or who, under a lawful court order, has been conditionally released from detention or ordered to perform work in the community; or
(b) work or service performed under a work and development order under the State Penalties Enforcement Act 1999 ; or
(c) work or service required because of an emergency threatening the Queensland community or a part of the Queensland community; or
(d) work or service that forms part of normal civil obligations.
sec.19
Freedom of movement
sec.19 Freedom of movement
Every person lawfully within Queensland has the right to move freely within Queensland and to enter and leave it, and has the freedom to choose where to live.
sec.20
Freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief
sec.20 Freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief
Every person has the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief, including—
the freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of the person’s choice; and
the freedom to demonstrate the person’s religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching, either individually or as part of a community, in public or in private.
A person must not be coerced or restrained in a way that limits the person’s freedom to have or adopt a religion or belief.
(sec.20-ssec.1) Every person has the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief, including— the freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of the person’s choice; and the freedom to demonstrate the person’s religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching, either individually or as part of a community, in public or in private.
(sec.20-ssec.2) A person must not be coerced or restrained in a way that limits the person’s freedom to have or adopt a religion or belief.
(a) the freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of the person’s choice; and
(b) the freedom to demonstrate the person’s religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching, either individually or as part of a community, in public or in private.
sec.21
Freedom of expression
sec.21 Freedom of expression
Every person has the right to hold an opinion without interference.
Every person has the right to freedom of expression which includes the freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, whether within or outside Queensland and whether—
orally; or
in writing; or
in print; or
by way of art; or
in another medium chosen by the person.
(sec.21-ssec.1) Every person has the right to hold an opinion without interference.
(sec.21-ssec.2) Every person has the right to freedom of expression which includes the freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, whether within or outside Queensland and whether— orally; or in writing; or in print; or by way of art; or in another medium chosen by the person.
(a) orally; or
(b) in writing; or
(c) in print; or
(d) by way of art; or
(e) in another medium chosen by the person.
sec.22
Peaceful assembly and freedom of association
sec.22 Peaceful assembly and freedom of association
Every person has the right of peaceful assembly.
Every person has the right to freedom of association with others, including the right to form and join trade unions.
(sec.22-ssec.1) Every person has the right of peaceful assembly.
(sec.22-ssec.2) Every person has the right to freedom of association with others, including the right to form and join trade unions.
sec.23
Taking part in public life
sec.23 Taking part in public life
Every person in Queensland has the right, and is to have the opportunity, without discrimination to participate in the conduct of public affairs, directly or through freely chosen representatives.
Every eligible person has the right, and is to have the opportunity, without discrimination—
to vote and be elected at periodic State and local government elections that guarantee the free expression of the will of the electors; and
to have access, on general terms of equality, to the public service and to public office.
(sec.23-ssec.1) Every person in Queensland has the right, and is to have the opportunity, without discrimination to participate in the conduct of public affairs, directly or through freely chosen representatives.
(sec.23-ssec.2) Every eligible person has the right, and is to have the opportunity, without discrimination— to vote and be elected at periodic State and local government elections that guarantee the free expression of the will of the electors; and to have access, on general terms of equality, to the public service and to public office.
(a) to vote and be elected at periodic State and local government elections that guarantee the free expression of the will of the electors; and
(b) to have access, on general terms of equality, to the public service and to public office.
sec.24
Property rights
sec.24 Property rights
All persons have the right to own property alone or in association with others.
A person must not be arbitrarily deprived of the person’s property.
(sec.24-ssec.1) All persons have the right to own property alone or in association with others.
(sec.24-ssec.2) A person must not be arbitrarily deprived of the person’s property.
sec.25
Privacy and reputation
sec.25 Privacy and reputation
A person has the right—
not to have the person’s privacy, family, home or correspondence unlawfully or arbitrarily interfered with; and
not to have the person’s reputation unlawfully attacked.
(a) not to have the person’s privacy, family, home or correspondence unlawfully or arbitrarily interfered with; and
(b) not to have the person’s reputation unlawfully attacked.
sec.26
Protection of families and children
sec.26 Protection of families and children
Families are the fundamental group unit of society and are entitled to be protected by society and the State.
Every child has the right, without discrimination, to the protection that is needed by the child, and is in the child’s best interests, because of being a child.
Every person born in Queensland has the right to a name and to be registered, as having been born, under a law of the State as soon as practicable after being born.
(sec.26-ssec.1) Families are the fundamental group unit of society and are entitled to be protected by society and the State.
(sec.26-ssec.2) Every child has the right, without discrimination, to the protection that is needed by the child, and is in the child’s best interests, because of being a child.
(sec.26-ssec.3) Every person born in Queensland has the right to a name and to be registered, as having been born, under a law of the State as soon as practicable after being born.
sec.27
Cultural rights—generally
sec.27 Cultural rights—generally
All persons with a particular cultural, religious, racial or linguistic background must not be denied the right, in community with other persons of that background, to enjoy their culture, to declare and practise their religion and to use their language.
sec.28
Cultural rights—Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islander peoples
sec.28 Cultural rights—Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islander peoples
Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islander peoples hold distinct cultural rights.
Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islander peoples must not be denied the right, with other members of their community—
to enjoy, maintain, control, protect and develop their identity and cultural heritage, including their traditional knowledge, distinctive spiritual practices, observances, beliefs and teachings; and
to enjoy, maintain, control, protect, develop and use their language, including traditional cultural expressions; and
to enjoy, maintain, control, protect and develop their kinship ties; and
to maintain and strengthen their distinctive spiritual, material and economic relationship with the land, territories, waters, coastal seas and other resources with which they have a connection under Aboriginal tradition or Island custom; and
to conserve and protect the environment and productive capacity of their land, territories, waters, coastal seas and other resources.
Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islander peoples have the right not to be subjected to forced assimilation or destruction of their culture.
(sec.28-ssec.1) Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islander peoples hold distinct cultural rights.
(sec.28-ssec.2) Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islander peoples must not be denied the right, with other members of their community— to enjoy, maintain, control, protect and develop their identity and cultural heritage, including their traditional knowledge, distinctive spiritual practices, observances, beliefs and teachings; and to enjoy, maintain, control, protect, develop and use their language, including traditional cultural expressions; and to enjoy, maintain, control, protect and develop their kinship ties; and to maintain and strengthen their distinctive spiritual, material and economic relationship with the land, territories, waters, coastal seas and other resources with which they have a connection under Aboriginal tradition or Island custom; and to conserve and protect the environment and productive capacity of their land, territories, waters, coastal seas and other resources.
(sec.28-ssec.3) Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islander peoples have the right not to be subjected to forced assimilation or destruction of their culture.
(a) to enjoy, maintain, control, protect and develop their identity and cultural heritage, including their traditional knowledge, distinctive spiritual practices, observances, beliefs and teachings; and
(b) to enjoy, maintain, control, protect, develop and use their language, including traditional cultural expressions; and
(c) to enjoy, maintain, control, protect and develop their kinship ties; and
(d) to maintain and strengthen their distinctive spiritual, material and economic relationship with the land, territories, waters, coastal seas and other resources with which they have a connection under Aboriginal tradition or Island custom; and
(e) to conserve and protect the environment and productive capacity of their land, territories, waters, coastal seas and other resources.
sec.29
Right to liberty and security of person
sec.29 Right to liberty and security of person
Every person has the right to liberty and security.
A person must not be subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention.
A person must not be deprived of the person’s liberty except on grounds, and in accordance with procedures, established by law.
A person who is arrested or detained must be informed at the time of arrest or detention of the reason for the arrest or detention and must be promptly informed about any proceedings to be brought against the person.
A person who is arrested or detained on a criminal charge—
must be promptly brought before a court; and
has the right to be brought to trial without unreasonable delay; and
must be released if paragraph (a) or (b) is not complied with.
A person awaiting trial must not be automatically detained in custody, but the person’s release may be subject to guarantees to appear—
for trial; and
at any other stage of the judicial proceeding; and
if appropriate, for execution of judgment.
A person deprived of liberty by arrest or detention is entitled to apply to a court for a declaration or order regarding the lawfulness of the person’s detention, and the court must—
make a decision without delay; and
order the release of the person if it finds the detention is unlawful.
A person must not be imprisoned only because of the person’s inability to perform a contractual obligation.
(sec.29-ssec.1) Every person has the right to liberty and security.
(sec.29-ssec.2) A person must not be subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention.
(sec.29-ssec.3) A person must not be deprived of the person’s liberty except on grounds, and in accordance with procedures, established by law.
(sec.29-ssec.4) A person who is arrested or detained must be informed at the time of arrest or detention of the reason for the arrest or detention and must be promptly informed about any proceedings to be brought against the person.
(sec.29-ssec.5) A person who is arrested or detained on a criminal charge— must be promptly brought before a court; and has the right to be brought to trial without unreasonable delay; and must be released if paragraph (a) or (b) is not complied with.
(sec.29-ssec.6) A person awaiting trial must not be automatically detained in custody, but the person’s release may be subject to guarantees to appear— for trial; and at any other stage of the judicial proceeding; and if appropriate, for execution of judgment.
(sec.29-ssec.7) A person deprived of liberty by arrest or detention is entitled to apply to a court for a declaration or order regarding the lawfulness of the person’s detention, and the court must— make a decision without delay; and order the release of the person if it finds the detention is unlawful.
(sec.29-ssec.8) A person must not be imprisoned only because of the person’s inability to perform a contractual obligation.
(a) must be promptly brought before a court; and
(b) has the right to be brought to trial without unreasonable delay; and
(c) must be released if paragraph (a) or (b) is not complied with.
(a) for trial; and
(b) at any other stage of the judicial proceeding; and
(c) if appropriate, for execution of judgment.
(a) make a decision without delay; and
(b) order the release of the person if it finds the detention is unlawful.
sec.30
Humane treatment when deprived of liberty
sec.30 Humane treatment when deprived of liberty
All persons deprived of liberty must be treated with humanity and with respect for the inherent dignity of the human person.
An accused person who is detained or a person detained without charge must be segregated from persons who have been convicted of offences, unless reasonably necessary.
An accused person who is detained or a person detained without charge must be treated in a way that is appropriate for a person who has not been convicted.
(sec.30-ssec.1) All persons deprived of liberty must be treated with humanity and with respect for the inherent dignity of the human person.
(sec.30-ssec.2) An accused person who is detained or a person detained without charge must be segregated from persons who have been convicted of offences, unless reasonably necessary.
(sec.30-ssec.3) An accused person who is detained or a person detained without charge must be treated in a way that is appropriate for a person who has not been convicted.
sec.31
Fair hearing
sec.31 Fair hearing
A person charged with a criminal offence or a party to a civil proceeding has the right to have the charge or proceeding decided by a competent, independent and impartial court or tribunal after a fair and public hearing.
However, a court or tribunal may exclude members of media organisations, other persons or the general public from all or part of a hearing in the public interest or the interests of justice.
All judgments or decisions made by a court or tribunal in a proceeding must be publicly available.
(sec.31-ssec.1) A person charged with a criminal offence or a party to a civil proceeding has the right to have the charge or proceeding decided by a competent, independent and impartial court or tribunal after a fair and public hearing.
(sec.31-ssec.2) However, a court or tribunal may exclude members of media organisations, other persons or the general public from all or part of a hearing in the public interest or the interests of justice.
(sec.31-ssec.3) All judgments or decisions made by a court or tribunal in a proceeding must be publicly available.
sec.32
Rights in criminal proceedings
sec.32 Rights in criminal proceedings
A person charged with a criminal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.
A person charged with a criminal offence is entitled without discrimination to the following minimum guarantees—
to be informed promptly and in detail of the nature and reason for the charge in a language or, if necessary, a type of communication the person speaks or understands;
to have adequate time and facilities to prepare the person’s defence and to communicate with a lawyer or advisor chosen by the person;
to be tried without unreasonable delay;
to be tried in person, and to defend themselves personally or through legal assistance chosen by the person or, if eligible, through legal aid;
to be told, if the person does not have legal assistance, about the right, if eligible, to legal aid;
to have legal aid provided if the interests of justice require it, without any costs payable by the person if the person is eligible for free legal aid under the Legal Aid Queensland Act 1997 ;
to examine, or have examined, witnesses against the person;
to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on the person’s behalf under the same conditions as witnesses for the prosecution;
to have the free assistance of an interpreter if the person can not understand or speak English;
to have the free assistance of specialised communication tools and technology, and assistants, if the person has communication or speech difficulties that require the assistance;
not to be compelled to testify against themselves or to confess guilt.
A child charged with a criminal offence has the right to a procedure that takes account of the child’s age and the desirability of promoting the child's rehabilitation.
A person convicted of a criminal offence has the right to have the conviction and any sentence imposed in relation to it reviewed by a higher court in accordance with law.
In this section—
legal aid means legal assistance given under the Legal Aid Queensland Act 1997 .
(sec.32-ssec.1) A person charged with a criminal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.
(sec.32-ssec.2) A person charged with a criminal offence is entitled without discrimination to the following minimum guarantees— to be informed promptly and in detail of the nature and reason for the charge in a language or, if necessary, a type of communication the person speaks or understands; to have adequate time and facilities to prepare the person’s defence and to communicate with a lawyer or advisor chosen by the person; to be tried without unreasonable delay; to be tried in person, and to defend themselves personally or through legal assistance chosen by the person or, if eligible, through legal aid; to be told, if the person does not have legal assistance, about the right, if eligible, to legal aid; to have legal aid provided if the interests of justice require it, without any costs payable by the person if the person is eligible for free legal aid under the Legal Aid Queensland Act 1997 ; to examine, or have examined, witnesses against the person; to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on the person’s behalf under the same conditions as witnesses for the prosecution; to have the free assistance of an interpreter if the person can not understand or speak English; to have the free assistance of specialised communication tools and technology, and assistants, if the person has communication or speech difficulties that require the assistance; not to be compelled to testify against themselves or to confess guilt.
(sec.32-ssec.3) A child charged with a criminal offence has the right to a procedure that takes account of the child’s age and the desirability of promoting the child's rehabilitation.
(sec.32-ssec.4) A person convicted of a criminal offence has the right to have the conviction and any sentence imposed in relation to it reviewed by a higher court in accordance with law.
(sec.32-ssec.5) In this section— legal aid means legal assistance given under the Legal Aid Queensland Act 1997 .
(a) to be informed promptly and in detail of the nature and reason for the charge in a language or, if necessary, a type of communication the person speaks or understands;
(b) to have adequate time and facilities to prepare the person’s defence and to communicate with a lawyer or advisor chosen by the person;
(c) to be tried without unreasonable delay;
(d) to be tried in person, and to defend themselves personally or through legal assistance chosen by the person or, if eligible, through legal aid;
(e) to be told, if the person does not have legal assistance, about the right, if eligible, to legal aid;
(f) to have legal aid provided if the interests of justice require it, without any costs payable by the person if the person is eligible for free legal aid under the Legal Aid Queensland Act 1997 ;
(g) to examine, or have examined, witnesses against the person;
(h) to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on the person’s behalf under the same conditions as witnesses for the prosecution;
(i) to have the free assistance of an interpreter if the person can not understand or speak English;
(j) to have the free assistance of specialised communication tools and technology, and assistants, if the person has communication or speech difficulties that require the assistance;
(k) not to be compelled to testify against themselves or to confess guilt.
sec.33
Children in the criminal process
sec.33 Children in the criminal process
An accused child who is detained, or a child detained without charge, must be segregated from all detained adults.
An accused child must be brought to trial as quickly as possible.
A child who has been convicted of an offence must be treated in a way that is appropriate for the child’s age.
(sec.33-ssec.1) An accused child who is detained, or a child detained without charge, must be segregated from all detained adults.
(sec.33-ssec.2) An accused child must be brought to trial as quickly as possible.
(sec.33-ssec.3) A child who has been convicted of an offence must be treated in a way that is appropriate for the child’s age.
sec.34
Right not to be tried or punished more than once
sec.34 Right not to be tried or punished more than once
A person must not be tried or punished more than once for an offence in relation to which the person has already been finally convicted or acquitted in accordance with law.
sec.35
Retrospective criminal laws
sec.35 Retrospective criminal laws
A person must not be found guilty of a criminal offence because of conduct that was not a criminal offence when it was engaged in.
A penalty must not be imposed on any person for a criminal offence that is greater than the penalty that applied to the offence when it was committed.
If a penalty for an offence is reduced after a person committed the offence but before the person is sentenced for the offence, the person is eligible for the reduced penalty.
Nothing in this section affects the trial or punishment of any person for any act or omission that was a criminal offence under international law at the time it was done or omitted to be done.
(sec.35-ssec.1) A person must not be found guilty of a criminal offence because of conduct that was not a criminal offence when it was engaged in.
(sec.35-ssec.2) A penalty must not be imposed on any person for a criminal offence that is greater than the penalty that applied to the offence when it was committed.
(sec.35-ssec.3) If a penalty for an offence is reduced after a person committed the offence but before the person is sentenced for the offence, the person is eligible for the reduced penalty.
(sec.35-ssec.4) Nothing in this section affects the trial or punishment of any person for any act or omission that was a criminal offence under international law at the time it was done or omitted to be done.
pt.2-div.3
Economic, social and cultural rights
Economic, social and cultural rights
sec.36
Right to education
sec.36 Right to education
Every child has the right to have access to primary and secondary education appropriate to the child’s needs.
Every person has the right to have access, based on the person’s abilities, to further vocational education and training that is equally accessible to all.
(sec.36-ssec.1) Every child has the right to have access to primary and secondary education appropriate to the child’s needs.
(sec.36-ssec.2) Every person has the right to have access, based on the person’s abilities, to further vocational education and training that is equally accessible to all.
sec.37
Right to health services
sec.37 Right to health services
Every person has the right to access health services without discrimination.
A person must not be refused emergency medical treatment that is immediately necessary to save the person’s life or to prevent serious impairment to the person.
(sec.37-ssec.1) Every person has the right to access health services without discrimination.
(sec.37-ssec.2) A person must not be refused emergency medical treatment that is immediately necessary to save the person’s life or to prevent serious impairment to the person.
pt.3
Application of human rights in Queensland
Application of human rights in Queensland
pt.3-div.1
Scrutiny of new legislation
Scrutiny of new legislation
sec.38
Statements of compatibility
sec.38 Statements of compatibility
A member who proposes to introduce a Bill in the Legislative Assembly must prepare a statement of compatibility for the Bill.
The statement of compatibility must state—
whether, in the member’s opinion, the Bill is compatible with human rights and, if so, how it is compatible; and
if, in the member’s opinion, a part of the Bill is not compatible with human rights, the nature and extent of the incompatibility.
Subsections (1) and (2) apply to Ministers introducing government Bills and members introducing private members’ Bills.
A member who introduces a Bill in the Legislative Assembly, or another member acting on the member’s behalf, must table the statement of compatibility prepared under this section when introducing the Bill.
The statement of compatibility is not binding on any court or tribunal.
(sec.38-ssec.1) A member who proposes to introduce a Bill in the Legislative Assembly must prepare a statement of compatibility for the Bill.
(sec.38-ssec.2) The statement of compatibility must state— whether, in the member’s opinion, the Bill is compatible with human rights and, if so, how it is compatible; and if, in the member’s opinion, a part of the Bill is not compatible with human rights, the nature and extent of the incompatibility. Subsections (1) and (2) apply to Ministers introducing government Bills and members introducing private members’ Bills.
(sec.38-ssec.3) A member who introduces a Bill in the Legislative Assembly, or another member acting on the member’s behalf, must table the statement of compatibility prepared under this section when introducing the Bill.
(sec.38-ssec.4) The statement of compatibility is not binding on any court or tribunal.
(a) whether, in the member’s opinion, the Bill is compatible with human rights and, if so, how it is compatible; and
(b) if, in the member’s opinion, a part of the Bill is not compatible with human rights, the nature and extent of the incompatibility.
sec.39
Scrutiny of Bills and statements of compatibility by portfolio committee
sec.39 Scrutiny of Bills and statements of compatibility by portfolio committee
The portfolio committee responsible for examining a Bill introduced in the Legislative Assembly must—
consider the Bill and report to the Assembly about whether the Bill is not compatible with human rights; and
consider the statement of compatibility tabled for the Bill and report to the Assembly about the statement.
(a) consider the Bill and report to the Assembly about whether the Bill is not compatible with human rights; and
(b) consider the statement of compatibility tabled for the Bill and report to the Assembly about the statement.
sec.40
Scrutiny of non-Queensland laws by portfolio committee
sec.40 Scrutiny of non-Queensland laws by portfolio committee
The Legislative Assembly may refer a non-Queensland law to a portfolio committee.
If a non-Queensland law is referred under subsection (1) , the portfolio committee must consider the law and report to the Legislative Assembly about whether the law is not compatible with human rights.
(sec.40-ssec.1) The Legislative Assembly may refer a non-Queensland law to a portfolio committee.
(sec.40-ssec.2) If a non-Queensland law is referred under subsection (1) , the portfolio committee must consider the law and report to the Legislative Assembly about whether the law is not compatible with human rights.
sec.41
Human rights certificate for subordinate legislation
sec.41 Human rights certificate for subordinate legislation
The responsible Minister for subordinate legislation must prepare a human rights certificate for the legislation.
However, if there is more than 1 responsible Minister for the subordinate legislation, the human rights certificate for the legislation may be prepared by 1 of the responsible Ministers under the authority of the other responsible Ministers.
The human rights certificate must state—
whether, in the opinion of the Minister preparing the certificate, the subordinate legislation is compatible with human rights and, if so, how it is compatible; and
if, in the opinion of the Minister preparing the certificate, a part of the subordinate legislation is not compatible with human rights, the nature and extent of the incompatibility.
When subordinate legislation is tabled in the Legislative Assembly, it must be accompanied by the human rights certificate prepared under this section for the legislation.
See the Statutory Instruments Act 1992 , section 49 for the requirement to table subordinate legislation.
The portfolio committee responsible for examining the subordinate legislation may, in examining the legislation, also consider the human rights certificate.
This section does not apply in relation to subordinate legislation that is—
a proclamation or other instrument that fixes a single day for the commencement of all of the provisions of an Act that are not in force; or
an instrument, other than a regulation, of a type prescribed by regulation.
The Minister may recommend to the Governor in Council the making of a regulation under subsection (4A) (b) only if the Minister is satisfied an instrument of that type will not directly or indirectly limit a human right.
In this section—
responsible Minister , for subordinate legislation, means the Minister who administers the law or provision of the law under which the subordinate legislation is made.
s 41 amd 2020 No. 15 s 81B
(sec.41-ssec.1) The responsible Minister for subordinate legislation must prepare a human rights certificate for the legislation.
(sec.41-ssec.1A) However, if there is more than 1 responsible Minister for the subordinate legislation, the human rights certificate for the legislation may be prepared by 1 of the responsible Ministers under the authority of the other responsible Ministers.
(sec.41-ssec.2) The human rights certificate must state— whether, in the opinion of the Minister preparing the certificate, the subordinate legislation is compatible with human rights and, if so, how it is compatible; and if, in the opinion of the Minister preparing the certificate, a part of the subordinate legislation is not compatible with human rights, the nature and extent of the incompatibility.
(sec.41-ssec.3) When subordinate legislation is tabled in the Legislative Assembly, it must be accompanied by the human rights certificate prepared under this section for the legislation. See the Statutory Instruments Act 1992 , section 49 for the requirement to table subordinate legislation.
(sec.41-ssec.4) The portfolio committee responsible for examining the subordinate legislation may, in examining the legislation, also consider the human rights certificate.
(sec.41-ssec.4A) This section does not apply in relation to subordinate legislation that is— a proclamation or other instrument that fixes a single day for the commencement of all of the provisions of an Act that are not in force; or an instrument, other than a regulation, of a type prescribed by regulation.
(sec.41-ssec.4B) The Minister may recommend to the Governor in Council the making of a regulation under subsection (4A) (b) only if the Minister is satisfied an instrument of that type will not directly or indirectly limit a human right.
(sec.41-ssec.5) In this section— responsible Minister , for subordinate legislation, means the Minister who administers the law or provision of the law under which the subordinate legislation is made.
(a) whether, in the opinion of the Minister preparing the certificate, the subordinate legislation is compatible with human rights and, if so, how it is compatible; and
(b) if, in the opinion of the Minister preparing the certificate, a part of the subordinate legislation is not compatible with human rights, the nature and extent of the incompatibility.
(a) a proclamation or other instrument that fixes a single day for the commencement of all of the provisions of an Act that are not in force; or
(b) an instrument, other than a regulation, of a type prescribed by regulation.
sec.42
No effect on application of laws
sec.42 No effect on application of laws
A failure to comply with this division in relation to a Bill that becomes an Act, a non-Queensland law or subordinate legislation does not affect the validity of the Act , law, subordinate legislation or any other law.
pt.3-div.2
Override declarations
Override declarations
sec.43
Override by Parliament
sec.43 Override by Parliament
Parliament may expressly declare in an Act that the Act or another Act, or a provision of the Act or another Act, has effect despite being incompatible with 1 or more human rights or despite anything else in this Act.
A declaration under subsection (1) is an override declaration .
If an override declaration is made in relation to an Act or a provision of an Act, the declaration extends to a statutory instrument made under the Act or provision.
It is the intention of Parliament that an override declaration will only be made in exceptional circumstances.
war, a state of emergency, an exceptional crisis situation constituting a threat to public safety, health or order
(sec.43-ssec.1) Parliament may expressly declare in an Act that the Act or another Act, or a provision of the Act or another Act, has effect despite being incompatible with 1 or more human rights or despite anything else in this Act.
(sec.43-ssec.2) A declaration under subsection (1) is an override declaration .
(sec.43-ssec.3) If an override declaration is made in relation to an Act or a provision of an Act, the declaration extends to a statutory instrument made under the Act or provision.
(sec.43-ssec.4) It is the intention of Parliament that an override declaration will only be made in exceptional circumstances. war, a state of emergency, an exceptional crisis situation constituting a threat to public safety, health or order
sec.44
Statement about exceptional circumstances
sec.44 Statement about exceptional circumstances
A member who introduces in the Legislative Assembly a Bill containing an override declaration, or another member acting on the member’s behalf, must make a statement to the Assembly explaining the exceptional circumstances that justify including the override declaration.
The statement under subsection (1) must be made when introducing the Bill.
If the override declaration is contained in an amendment in consideration of a Bill, the statement under subsection (1) must be made—
by the member who moves the amendment or another member acting on the member’s behalf; and
when the amendment is moved.
(sec.44-ssec.1) A member who introduces in the Legislative Assembly a Bill containing an override declaration, or another member acting on the member’s behalf, must make a statement to the Assembly explaining the exceptional circumstances that justify including the override declaration.
(sec.44-ssec.2) The statement under subsection (1) must be made when introducing the Bill.
(sec.44-ssec.3) If the override declaration is contained in an amendment in consideration of a Bill, the statement under subsection (1) must be made— by the member who moves the amendment or another member acting on the member’s behalf; and when the amendment is moved.
(a) by the member who moves the amendment or another member acting on the member’s behalf; and
(b) when the amendment is moved.
sec.45
Effect and expiry of override declaration
sec.45 Effect and expiry of override declaration
If an override declaration is made in relation to an Act or a provision of an Act, this Act does not apply to the Act or provision to the extent of the declaration while the declaration is in force.
If this Act does not apply to an Act or provision of an Act for which an override declaration has been made, the Supreme Court can not make a declaration of incompatibility in relation to the Act or provision (see section 53 (3) ). Also, the requirement under section 48 to interpret the Act or provision in a way that is compatible with human rights does not apply (see section 48 (5) ).
A provision of an Act containing an override declaration expires 5 years after the day on which the provision commences or on an earlier day stated in the Act .
(sec.45-ssec.1) If an override declaration is made in relation to an Act or a provision of an Act, this Act does not apply to the Act or provision to the extent of the declaration while the declaration is in force. If this Act does not apply to an Act or provision of an Act for which an override declaration has been made, the Supreme Court can not make a declaration of incompatibility in relation to the Act or provision (see section 53 (3) ). Also, the requirement under section 48 to interpret the Act or provision in a way that is compatible with human rights does not apply (see section 48 (5) ).
(sec.45-ssec.2) A provision of an Act containing an override declaration expires 5 years after the day on which the provision commences or on an earlier day stated in the Act .
sec.46
Re-enacting override declaration
sec.46 Re-enacting override declaration
Parliament may, at any time, re-enact an override declaration.
This division applies in relation to a re-enacted override declaration.
(sec.46-ssec.1) Parliament may, at any time, re-enact an override declaration.
(sec.46-ssec.2) This division applies in relation to a re-enacted override declaration.
sec.47
No effect on validity
sec.47 No effect on validity
A failure to comply with section 44 in relation to a Bill that becomes an Act does not affect the validity of the Act or any other law.
pt.3-div.3
Interpretation of laws
Interpretation of laws
sec.48
Interpretation
sec.48 Interpretation
All statutory provisions must, to the extent possible that is consistent with their purpose, be interpreted in a way that is compatible with human rights.
If a statutory provision can not be interpreted in a way that is compatible with human rights, the provision must, to the extent possible that is consistent with its purpose, be interpreted in a way that is most compatible with human rights.
International law and the judgments of domestic, foreign and international courts and tribunals relevant to a human right may be considered in interpreting a statutory provision.
This section does not affect the validity of—
an Act or provision of an Act that is not compatible with human rights; or
a statutory instrument or provision of a statutory instrument that is not compatible with human rights and is empowered to be so by the Act under which it is made.
This section does not apply to a statutory provision the subject of an override declaration that is in force.
(sec.48-ssec.1) All statutory provisions must, to the extent possible that is consistent with their purpose, be interpreted in a way that is compatible with human rights.
(sec.48-ssec.2) If a statutory provision can not be interpreted in a way that is compatible with human rights, the provision must, to the extent possible that is consistent with its purpose, be interpreted in a way that is most compatible with human rights.
(sec.48-ssec.3) International law and the judgments of domestic, foreign and international courts and tribunals relevant to a human right may be considered in interpreting a statutory provision.
(sec.48-ssec.4) This section does not affect the validity of— an Act or provision of an Act that is not compatible with human rights; or a statutory instrument or provision of a statutory instrument that is not compatible with human rights and is empowered to be so by the Act under which it is made.
(sec.48-ssec.5) This section does not apply to a statutory provision the subject of an override declaration that is in force.
(a) an Act or provision of an Act that is not compatible with human rights; or
(b) a statutory instrument or provision of a statutory instrument that is not compatible with human rights and is empowered to be so by the Act under which it is made.
sec.49
Referral to Supreme Court
sec.49 Referral to Supreme Court
This section applies if, in a proceeding before a court or tribunal—
a question of law arises that relates to the application of this Act; or
a question arises in relation to the interpretation of a statutory provision in accordance with this Act.
The question may be referred to the Supreme Court if—
a party to the proceeding has made an application for referral; and
the court or tribunal considers the question is appropriate to be decided by the Supreme Court.
If a question is referred under subsection (2) , the court or tribunal referring the question must not—
make a decision about the matter to which the question is relevant while the referral is pending; or
proceed in a way or make a decision that is inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s decision on the question.
If a question is referred under subsection (2) by the Trial Division of the Supreme Court, the referral is to be made to the Court of Appeal.
Despite any other Act, if a question arises of a kind mentioned in subsection (1) , the question may only be referred to the Supreme Court under this section.
(sec.49-ssec.1) This section applies if, in a proceeding before a court or tribunal— a question of law arises that relates to the application of this Act; or a question arises in relation to the interpretation of a statutory provision in accordance with this Act.
(sec.49-ssec.2) The question may be referred to the Supreme Court if— a party to the proceeding has made an application for referral; and the court or tribunal considers the question is appropriate to be decided by the Supreme Court.
(sec.49-ssec.3) If a question is referred under subsection (2) , the court or tribunal referring the question must not— make a decision about the matter to which the question is relevant while the referral is pending; or proceed in a way or make a decision that is inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s decision on the question.
(sec.49-ssec.4) If a question is referred under subsection (2) by the Trial Division of the Supreme Court, the referral is to be made to the Court of Appeal.
(sec.49-ssec.5) Despite any other Act, if a question arises of a kind mentioned in subsection (1) , the question may only be referred to the Supreme Court under this section.
(a) a question of law arises that relates to the application of this Act; or
(b) a question arises in relation to the interpretation of a statutory provision in accordance with this Act.
(a) a party to the proceeding has made an application for referral; and
(b) the court or tribunal considers the question is appropriate to be decided by the Supreme Court.
(a) make a decision about the matter to which the question is relevant while the referral is pending; or
(b) proceed in a way or make a decision that is inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s decision on the question.
sec.50
Intervention by Attorney-General
sec.50 Intervention by Attorney-General
The Attorney-General may, for the State, intervene in and be joined as a party to a proceeding before a court or tribunal in which—
a question of law arises that relates to the application of this Act; or
a question arises in relation to the interpretation of a statutory provision in accordance with this Act.
If the Attorney-General intervenes, the Attorney-General becomes a party to the proceeding for the purpose of any appeal from an order made in the proceeding.
(sec.50-ssec.1) The Attorney-General may, for the State, intervene in and be joined as a party to a proceeding before a court or tribunal in which— a question of law arises that relates to the application of this Act; or a question arises in relation to the interpretation of a statutory provision in accordance with this Act.
(sec.50-ssec.2) If the Attorney-General intervenes, the Attorney-General becomes a party to the proceeding for the purpose of any appeal from an order made in the proceeding.
(a) a question of law arises that relates to the application of this Act; or
(b) a question arises in relation to the interpretation of a statutory provision in accordance with this Act.
sec.51
Intervention by commission
sec.51 Intervention by commission
The commission may intervene in and be joined as a party to a proceeding before a court or tribunal in which—
a question of law arises that relates to the application of this Act; or
a question arises in relation to the interpretation of a statutory provision in accordance with this Act.
If the commission intervenes, the commission becomes a party to the proceeding for the purpose of any appeal from an order made in the proceeding.
(sec.51-ssec.1) The commission may intervene in and be joined as a party to a proceeding before a court or tribunal in which— a question of law arises that relates to the application of this Act; or a question arises in relation to the interpretation of a statutory provision in accordance with this Act.
(sec.51-ssec.2) If the commission intervenes, the commission becomes a party to the proceeding for the purpose of any appeal from an order made in the proceeding.
(a) a question of law arises that relates to the application of this Act; or
(b) a question arises in relation to the interpretation of a statutory provision in accordance with this Act.
sec.52
Notice to Attorney-General and commission
sec.52 Notice to Attorney-General and commission
A party to a proceeding must give notice in the approved form to the Attorney-General and the commission if—
for a proceeding in the Supreme Court, District Court, Land Court or Land Appeal Court—a question of law arises that relates to the application of this Act or a question arises in relation to the interpretation of a statutory provision in accordance with this Act; or
for any proceeding—a question is referred to the Supreme Court under section 49 .
However, the notice need not be given to—
the Attorney-General, if the State is a party to the proceeding; or
the commission, if the commission is a party to the proceeding.
Nothing in this section requires a court or tribunal to adjourn a proceeding in relation to which the notice is given.
s 52 amd 2023 No. 23 s 85
(sec.52-ssec.1) A party to a proceeding must give notice in the approved form to the Attorney-General and the commission if— for a proceeding in the Supreme Court, District Court, Land Court or Land Appeal Court—a question of law arises that relates to the application of this Act or a question arises in relation to the interpretation of a statutory provision in accordance with this Act; or for any proceeding—a question is referred to the Supreme Court under section 49 .
(sec.52-ssec.2) However, the notice need not be given to— the Attorney-General, if the State is a party to the proceeding; or the commission, if the commission is a party to the proceeding.
(sec.52-ssec.3) Nothing in this section requires a court or tribunal to adjourn a proceeding in relation to which the notice is given.
(a) for a proceeding in the Supreme Court, District Court, Land Court or Land Appeal Court—a question of law arises that relates to the application of this Act or a question arises in relation to the interpretation of a statutory provision in accordance with this Act; or
(b) for any proceeding—a question is referred to the Supreme Court under section 49 .
(a) the Attorney-General, if the State is a party to the proceeding; or
(b) the commission, if the commission is a party to the proceeding.
sec.53
Declaration of incompatibility
sec.53 Declaration of incompatibility
This section applies if—
in a proceeding in the Supreme Court a question of law arises that relates to the application of this Act or a question arises in relation to the interpretation of a statutory provision in accordance with this Act; or
a question is referred to the Supreme Court under section 49 ; or
an appeal before the Court of Appeal relates to a question mentioned in paragraph (a) .
The Supreme Court may, in a proceeding, make a declaration (a declaration of incompatibility ) to the effect that the court is of the opinion that a statutory provision can not be interpreted in a way compatible with human rights.
However, the Supreme Court can not make a declaration of incompatibility about a statutory provision if an override declaration is in force in relation to the provision.
If the Supreme Court is considering making a declaration of incompatibility, the court must give notice of that fact in the approved form to the Attorney-General and the commission.
The Supreme Court must not make a declaration of incompatibility unless the court is satisfied—
a notice has been given to the Attorney-General and the commission under subsection (4) ; and
a reasonable opportunity has been given to the Attorney-General and the commission to intervene in the proceeding or to make submissions about the proposed declaration.
For the Supreme Court of Queensland Act 1991 , section 62 , a declaration of incompatibility is taken to be an order of the court in the Trial Division.
(sec.53-ssec.1) This section applies if— in a proceeding in the Supreme Court a question of law arises that relates to the application of this Act or a question arises in relation to the interpretation of a statutory provision in accordance with this Act; or a question is referred to the Supreme Court under section 49 ; or an appeal before the Court of Appeal relates to a question mentioned in paragraph (a) .
(sec.53-ssec.2) The Supreme Court may, in a proceeding, make a declaration (a declaration of incompatibility ) to the effect that the court is of the opinion that a statutory provision can not be interpreted in a way compatible with human rights.
(sec.53-ssec.3) However, the Supreme Court can not make a declaration of incompatibility about a statutory provision if an override declaration is in force in relation to the provision.
(sec.53-ssec.4) If the Supreme Court is considering making a declaration of incompatibility, the court must give notice of that fact in the approved form to the Attorney-General and the commission.
(sec.53-ssec.5) The Supreme Court must not make a declaration of incompatibility unless the court is satisfied— a notice has been given to the Attorney-General and the commission under subsection (4) ; and a reasonable opportunity has been given to the Attorney-General and the commission to intervene in the proceeding or to make submissions about the proposed declaration.
(sec.53-ssec.6) For the Supreme Court of Queensland Act 1991 , section 62 , a declaration of incompatibility is taken to be an order of the court in the Trial Division.
(a) in a proceeding in the Supreme Court a question of law arises that relates to the application of this Act or a question arises in relation to the interpretation of a statutory provision in accordance with this Act; or
(b) a question is referred to the Supreme Court under section 49 ; or
(c) an appeal before the Court of Appeal relates to a question mentioned in paragraph (a) .
(a) a notice has been given to the Attorney-General and the commission under subsection (4) ; and
(b) a reasonable opportunity has been given to the Attorney-General and the commission to intervene in the proceeding or to make submissions about the proposed declaration.
sec.54
Effect of declaration of incompatibility
sec.54 Effect of declaration of incompatibility
A declaration of incompatibility does not—
affect in any way the validity of the statutory provision for which the declaration was made; or
create in any person any legal right or give rise to any civil cause of action.
(a) affect in any way the validity of the statutory provision for which the declaration was made; or
(b) create in any person any legal right or give rise to any civil cause of action.
sec.55
Giving copies of declaration of incompatibility
sec.55 Giving copies of declaration of incompatibility
The Supreme Court must give a copy of a declaration of incompatibility to the Attorney-General within 7 days after—
if the period for filing an appeal in relation to the proceeding in which the declaration was made has ended without an appeal having been filed—the end of that period; or
if an appeal has been filed in relation to the proceeding and, on appeal, the declaration is upheld—the appeal has been finalised.
If the Trial Division of the Supreme Court makes a declaration of incompatibility (based on a referral of a question from QCAT) and on appeal the Court of Appeal upholds the declaration, a copy of the declaration must be given to the Attorney-General within 7 days after the Court of Appeal’s decision.
The Attorney-General must, as soon as practicable, give a copy of a declaration of incompatibility received under subsection (1) to the Minister administering the statutory provision for which the declaration was made, unless the Minister is the Attorney-General.
(sec.55-ssec.1) The Supreme Court must give a copy of a declaration of incompatibility to the Attorney-General within 7 days after— if the period for filing an appeal in relation to the proceeding in which the declaration was made has ended without an appeal having been filed—the end of that period; or if an appeal has been filed in relation to the proceeding and, on appeal, the declaration is upheld—the appeal has been finalised. If the Trial Division of the Supreme Court makes a declaration of incompatibility (based on a referral of a question from QCAT) and on appeal the Court of Appeal upholds the declaration, a copy of the declaration must be given to the Attorney-General within 7 days after the Court of Appeal’s decision.
(sec.55-ssec.2) The Attorney-General must, as soon as practicable, give a copy of a declaration of incompatibility received under subsection (1) to the Minister administering the statutory provision for which the declaration was made, unless the Minister is the Attorney-General.
(a) if the period for filing an appeal in relation to the proceeding in which the declaration was made has ended without an appeal having been filed—the end of that period; or
(b) if an appeal has been filed in relation to the proceeding and, on appeal, the declaration is upheld—the appeal has been finalised. Example— If the Trial Division of the Supreme Court makes a declaration of incompatibility (based on a referral of a question from QCAT) and on appeal the Court of Appeal upholds the declaration, a copy of the declaration must be given to the Attorney-General within 7 days after the Court of Appeal’s decision.
sec.56
Action by Minister on declaration of incompatibility
sec.56 Action by Minister on declaration of incompatibility
The Minister administering a statutory provision for which a declaration of incompatibility was made must—
within 6 sitting days after receiving the declaration, table a copy of the declaration in the Legislative Assembly; and
within 6 months after receiving the declaration—
prepare a written response to the declaration; and
table a copy of the response in the Assembly.
In preparing the response mentioned in subsection (1) (b) , the Minister must consider the portfolio committee’s report to the Legislative Assembly under section 57 on the declaration of incompatibility.
Despite the Parliament of Queensland Act 2001 , section 9 , the declaration of incompatibility is not proceedings in the Assembly under that section.
(sec.56-ssec.1) The Minister administering a statutory provision for which a declaration of incompatibility was made must— within 6 sitting days after receiving the declaration, table a copy of the declaration in the Legislative Assembly; and within 6 months after receiving the declaration— prepare a written response to the declaration; and table a copy of the response in the Assembly.
(sec.56-ssec.2) In preparing the response mentioned in subsection (1) (b) , the Minister must consider the portfolio committee’s report to the Legislative Assembly under section 57 on the declaration of incompatibility.
(sec.56-ssec.3) Despite the Parliament of Queensland Act 2001 , section 9 , the declaration of incompatibility is not proceedings in the Assembly under that section.
(a) within 6 sitting days after receiving the declaration, table a copy of the declaration in the Legislative Assembly; and
(b) within 6 months after receiving the declaration— (i) prepare a written response to the declaration; and (ii) table a copy of the response in the Assembly.
(i) prepare a written response to the declaration; and
(ii) table a copy of the response in the Assembly.
(i) prepare a written response to the declaration; and
(ii) table a copy of the response in the Assembly.
sec.57
Action by portfolio committee on declaration of incompatibility
sec.57 Action by portfolio committee on declaration of incompatibility
The Legislative Assembly must refer a declaration of incompatibility tabled under section 56 to a portfolio committee.
If a declaration of incompatibility is referred under subsection (1) , the portfolio committee must—
consider the declaration; and
report on the declaration to the Legislative Assembly within 3 months after it is referred.
The report may include any recommendations about the declaration the portfolio committee considers appropriate.
(sec.57-ssec.1) The Legislative Assembly must refer a declaration of incompatibility tabled under section 56 to a portfolio committee.
(sec.57-ssec.2) If a declaration of incompatibility is referred under subsection (1) , the portfolio committee must— consider the declaration; and report on the declaration to the Legislative Assembly within 3 months after it is referred.
(sec.57-ssec.3) The report may include any recommendations about the declaration the portfolio committee considers appropriate.
(a) consider the declaration; and
(b) report on the declaration to the Legislative Assembly within 3 months after it is referred.
pt.3-div.4
Obligations on public entities
Obligations on public entities
sec.58
Conduct of public entities
sec.58 Conduct of public entities
It is unlawful for a public entity—
to act or make a decision in a way that is not compatible with human rights; or
in making a decision, to fail to give proper consideration to a human right relevant to the decision.
Subsection (1) does not apply to a public entity if the entity could not reasonably have acted differently or made a different decision because of a statutory provision, a law of the Commonwealth or another State or otherwise under law.
A public entity is acting to give effect to a statutory provision that is not compatible with human rights.
Also, subsection (1) does not apply to a body established for a religious purpose if the act or decision is done or made in accordance with the doctrine of the religion concerned and is necessary to avoid offending the religious sensitivities of the people of the religion.
This section does not apply to an act or decision of a private nature.
For subsection (1) (b) , giving proper consideration to a human right in making a decision includes, but is not limited to—
identifying the human rights that may be affected by the decision; and
considering whether the decision would be compatible with human rights.
To remove any doubt, it is declared that—
an act or decision of a public entity is not invalid merely because, by doing the act or making the decision, the entity contravenes subsection (1) ; and
a person does not commit an offence against this Act or another Act merely because the person acts or makes a decision in contravention of subsection (1) .
(sec.58-ssec.1) It is unlawful for a public entity— to act or make a decision in a way that is not compatible with human rights; or in making a decision, to fail to give proper consideration to a human right relevant to the decision.
(sec.58-ssec.2) Subsection (1) does not apply to a public entity if the entity could not reasonably have acted differently or made a different decision because of a statutory provision, a law of the Commonwealth or another State or otherwise under law. A public entity is acting to give effect to a statutory provision that is not compatible with human rights.
(sec.58-ssec.3) Also, subsection (1) does not apply to a body established for a religious purpose if the act or decision is done or made in accordance with the doctrine of the religion concerned and is necessary to avoid offending the religious sensitivities of the people of the religion.
(sec.58-ssec.4) This section does not apply to an act or decision of a private nature.
(sec.58-ssec.5) For subsection (1) (b) , giving proper consideration to a human right in making a decision includes, but is not limited to— identifying the human rights that may be affected by the decision; and considering whether the decision would be compatible with human rights.
(sec.58-ssec.6) To remove any doubt, it is declared that— an act or decision of a public entity is not invalid merely because, by doing the act or making the decision, the entity contravenes subsection (1) ; and a person does not commit an offence against this Act or another Act merely because the person acts or makes a decision in contravention of subsection (1) .
(a) to act or make a decision in a way that is not compatible with human rights; or
(b) in making a decision, to fail to give proper consideration to a human right relevant to the decision.
(a) identifying the human rights that may be affected by the decision; and
(b) considering whether the decision would be compatible with human rights.
(a) an act or decision of a public entity is not invalid merely because, by doing the act or making the decision, the entity contravenes subsection (1) ; and
(b) a person does not commit an offence against this Act or another Act merely because the person acts or makes a decision in contravention of subsection (1) .
sec.59
Legal proceedings
sec.59 Legal proceedings
Subsection (2) applies if a person may seek any relief or remedy in relation to an act or decision of a public entity on the ground that the act or decision was, other than because of section 58 , unlawful.
The person may seek the relief or remedy mentioned in subsection (1) on the ground of unlawfulness arising under section 58 , even if the person may not be successful in obtaining the relief or remedy on the ground mentioned in subsection (1) .
However, the person is not entitled to be awarded damages on the ground of unlawfulness arising under section 58 .
This section does not affect a right a person has, other than under this Act, to seek any relief or remedy in relation to an act or decision of a public entity, including—
a right to seek judicial review under the Judicial Review Act 1991 or the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 ; and
a right to seek a declaration of unlawfulness and associated relief including an injunction, a stay of proceedings or an exclusion of evidence.
A person may seek relief or remedy on a ground of unlawfulness arising under section 58 only under this section.
Nothing in this section affects a right a person may have to damages apart from the operation of this section.
(sec.59-ssec.1) Subsection (2) applies if a person may seek any relief or remedy in relation to an act or decision of a public entity on the ground that the act or decision was, other than because of section 58 , unlawful.
(sec.59-ssec.2) The person may seek the relief or remedy mentioned in subsection (1) on the ground of unlawfulness arising under section 58 , even if the person may not be successful in obtaining the relief or remedy on the ground mentioned in subsection (1) .
(sec.59-ssec.3) However, the person is not entitled to be awarded damages on the ground of unlawfulness arising under section 58 .
(sec.59-ssec.4) This section does not affect a right a person has, other than under this Act, to seek any relief or remedy in relation to an act or decision of a public entity, including— a right to seek judicial review under the Judicial Review Act 1991 or the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 ; and a right to seek a declaration of unlawfulness and associated relief including an injunction, a stay of proceedings or an exclusion of evidence.
(sec.59-ssec.5) A person may seek relief or remedy on a ground of unlawfulness arising under section 58 only under this section.
(sec.59-ssec.6) Nothing in this section affects a right a person may have to damages apart from the operation of this section.
(a) a right to seek judicial review under the Judicial Review Act 1991 or the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 ; and
(b) a right to seek a declaration of unlawfulness and associated relief including an injunction, a stay of proceedings or an exclusion of evidence.
sec.60
Entity may choose to be subject to obligations
sec.60 Entity may choose to be subject to obligations
An entity may ask the Minister, in writing, to declare that the entity is subject to the obligations of a public entity under this division.
If asked under subsection (1) , the Minister must make the declaration by gazette notice.
The Minister must, by gazette notice, revoke the declaration if asked in writing by the entity.
(sec.60-ssec.1) An entity may ask the Minister, in writing, to declare that the entity is subject to the obligations of a public entity under this division.
(sec.60-ssec.2) If asked under subsection (1) , the Minister must make the declaration by gazette notice.
(sec.60-ssec.3) The Minister must, by gazette notice, revoke the declaration if asked in writing by the entity.
pt.4
Queensland Human Rights Commission
Queensland Human Rights Commission
pt.4-div.1
Functions and powers of commission and commissioner under this Act
Functions and powers of commission and commissioner under this Act
sec.61
Functions
sec.61 Functions
The commission has the following functions under this Act—
to deal with human rights complaints under this part;
if asked by the Attorney-General, to review the effect of Acts, statutory instruments and the common law on human rights and give the Attorney-General a written report about the outcome of the review;
to review public entities’ policies, programs, procedures, practices and services in relation to their compatibility with human rights;
to promote an understanding and acceptance, and the public discussion, of human rights and this Act in Queensland;
to make information about human rights available to the community;
to provide education about human rights and this Act;
to assist the Attorney-General in reviews of this Act under sections 95 and 96 ;
to advise the Attorney-General about matters relevant to the operation of this Act;
another function conferred on the commission under this Act or another Act.
(a) to deal with human rights complaints under this part;
(b) if asked by the Attorney-General, to review the effect of Acts, statutory instruments and the common law on human rights and give the Attorney-General a written report about the outcome of the review;
(c) to review public entities’ policies, programs, procedures, practices and services in relation to their compatibility with human rights;
(d) to promote an understanding and acceptance, and the public discussion, of human rights and this Act in Queensland;
(e) to make information about human rights available to the community;
(f) to provide education about human rights and this Act;
(g) to assist the Attorney-General in reviews of this Act under sections 95 and 96 ;
(h) to advise the Attorney-General about matters relevant to the operation of this Act;
(i) another function conferred on the commission under this Act or another Act.
sec.62
Powers
sec.62 Powers
The commissioner has power to do all things necessary or convenient to be done for the performance of the commission’s functions under this Act.
pt.4-div.2
Human rights complaints
Human rights complaints
sec.63
Meaning of human rights complaint
sec.63 Meaning of human rights complaint
A human rights complaint is a complaint about an alleged contravention of section 58 (1) by a public entity in relation to an act or decision of the public entity.
sec.64
Who may make human rights complaint to commissioner
sec.64 Who may make human rights complaint to commissioner
The following persons may make a human rights complaint to the commissioner—
an individual the subject of a public entity’s alleged contravention of section 58 (1) ;
an agent of the individual;
a person authorised in writing by the commissioner to make a complaint for the individual.
For subsection (1) (c) , the commissioner may authorise a person to make a human rights complaint for an individual if satisfied the individual can not make the complaint.
Two or more persons may jointly make a human rights complaint.
(sec.64-ssec.1) The following persons may make a human rights complaint to the commissioner— an individual the subject of a public entity’s alleged contravention of section 58 (1) ; an agent of the individual; a person authorised in writing by the commissioner to make a complaint for the individual.
(sec.64-ssec.2) For subsection (1) (c) , the commissioner may authorise a person to make a human rights complaint for an individual if satisfied the individual can not make the complaint.
(sec.64-ssec.3) Two or more persons may jointly make a human rights complaint.
(a) an individual the subject of a public entity’s alleged contravention of section 58 (1) ;
(b) an agent of the individual;
(c) a person authorised in writing by the commissioner to make a complaint for the individual.
sec.65
Requirements for making human rights complaint to commissioner
sec.65 Requirements for making human rights complaint to commissioner
A person may make a human rights complaint to the commissioner only if—
the commissioner is satisfied the person has made a complaint to the public entity about the alleged contravention the subject of the complaint; and
a complaint made to the public entity under the entity’s system or procedures for complaints management
at least 45 business days have elapsed since the complaint mentioned in paragraph (a) was made; and
the person has not received a response to the complaint or has received a response the person considers to be an inadequate response.
However, the commissioner may accept a complaint made before the period mentioned in subsection (1) (b) has elapsed if the commissioner considers it appropriate because of exceptional circumstances.
(sec.65-ssec.1) A person may make a human rights complaint to the commissioner only if— the commissioner is satisfied the person has made a complaint to the public entity about the alleged contravention the subject of the complaint; and a complaint made to the public entity under the entity’s system or procedures for complaints management at least 45 business days have elapsed since the complaint mentioned in paragraph (a) was made; and the person has not received a response to the complaint or has received a response the person considers to be an inadequate response.
(sec.65-ssec.2) However, the commissioner may accept a complaint made before the period mentioned in subsection (1) (b) has elapsed if the commissioner considers it appropriate because of exceptional circumstances.
(a) the commissioner is satisfied the person has made a complaint to the public entity about the alleged contravention the subject of the complaint; and Example of making a complaint for paragraph (a) — a complaint made to the public entity under the entity’s system or procedures for complaints management
(b) at least 45 business days have elapsed since the complaint mentioned in paragraph (a) was made; and
(c) the person has not received a response to the complaint or has received a response the person considers to be an inadequate response.
sec.66
Referral entity may deal with or refer human rights complaint
sec.66 Referral entity may deal with or refer human rights complaint
This section applies if—
the ombudsman receives a complaint under the Ombudsman Act 2001 and the ombudsman considers the complaint may also be a human rights complaint; or
the health ombudsman receives a complaint under the Health Ombudsman Act 2013 and the health ombudsman considers the complaint may also be a human rights complaint; or
the Crime and Corruption Commission receives a complaint about corruption under the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 and the chairperson of the commission under that Act considers the complaint may also be a human rights complaint; or
the information commissioner receives a privacy complaint under the Information Privacy Act 2009 and the information commissioner considers the complaint may also be a human rights complaint.
The referral entity receiving the complaint may—
deal with the complaint under the referral Act under which the complaint was made; or
with the consent of the person who could make the human rights complaint under section 64 , refer the complaint to the commissioner.
Under section 74 , the commissioner and a referral entity may enter into an arrangement about referring complaints under a referral Act or dealing with complaints that are not referred.
(sec.66-ssec.1) This section applies if— the ombudsman receives a complaint under the Ombudsman Act 2001 and the ombudsman considers the complaint may also be a human rights complaint; or the health ombudsman receives a complaint under the Health Ombudsman Act 2013 and the health ombudsman considers the complaint may also be a human rights complaint; or the Crime and Corruption Commission receives a complaint about corruption under the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 and the chairperson of the commission under that Act considers the complaint may also be a human rights complaint; or the information commissioner receives a privacy complaint under the Information Privacy Act 2009 and the information commissioner considers the complaint may also be a human rights complaint.
(sec.66-ssec.2) The referral entity receiving the complaint may— deal with the complaint under the referral Act under which the complaint was made; or with the consent of the person who could make the human rights complaint under section 64 , refer the complaint to the commissioner. Under section 74 , the commissioner and a referral entity may enter into an arrangement about referring complaints under a referral Act or dealing with complaints that are not referred.
(a) the ombudsman receives a complaint under the Ombudsman Act 2001 and the ombudsman considers the complaint may also be a human rights complaint; or
(b) the health ombudsman receives a complaint under the Health Ombudsman Act 2013 and the health ombudsman considers the complaint may also be a human rights complaint; or
(c) the Crime and Corruption Commission receives a complaint about corruption under the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 and the chairperson of the commission under that Act considers the complaint may also be a human rights complaint; or
(d) the information commissioner receives a privacy complaint under the Information Privacy Act 2009 and the information commissioner considers the complaint may also be a human rights complaint.
(a) deal with the complaint under the referral Act under which the complaint was made; or
(b) with the consent of the person who could make the human rights complaint under section 64 , refer the complaint to the commissioner.
sec.67
Form of human rights complaint
sec.67 Form of human rights complaint
A human rights complaint made or referred to the commissioner must—
be written; and
state the complainant’s name and address for service; and
include enough details to indicate the alleged contravention to which the complaint relates.
If the commissioner is satisfied the complainant needs help to put the complaint in writing, the commissioner must give reasonable help to the complainant to put the complaint in writing.
(sec.67-ssec.1) A human rights complaint made or referred to the commissioner must— be written; and state the complainant’s name and address for service; and include enough details to indicate the alleged contravention to which the complaint relates.
(sec.67-ssec.2) If the commissioner is satisfied the complainant needs help to put the complaint in writing, the commissioner must give reasonable help to the complainant to put the complaint in writing.
(a) be written; and
(b) state the complainant’s name and address for service; and
(c) include enough details to indicate the alleged contravention to which the complaint relates.
sec.68
Preliminary inquiries
sec.68 Preliminary inquiries
The commissioner may make preliminary inquiries about a human rights complaint made or referred to the commissioner to decide how to deal with the complaint under this division.
sec.69
Commissioner must refuse to deal with particular complaint
sec.69 Commissioner must refuse to deal with particular complaint
The commissioner must refuse to deal with a human rights complaint if the commissioner considers the complaint is frivolous, trivial, vexatious, misconceived or lacking in substance.
sec.70
Commissioner may refuse to deal or to continue to deal, or defer dealing, with complaint
sec.70 Commissioner may refuse to deal or to continue to deal, or defer dealing, with complaint
The commissioner may refuse to deal or to continue to deal with a human rights complaint if—
the commissioner considers there is a more appropriate course of action available under another law to deal with the subject of the complaint; or
the commissioner considers the subject of the complaint has been appropriately dealt with by another entity; or
the commissioner considers the requirements under section 65 for making the complaint have not been met; or
the complaint was not made or referred to the commissioner within 1 year after the alleged contravention to which the complaint relates happened.
The commissioner may refuse to continue to deal with a human rights complaint if—
the complainant does not comply with a reasonable request made by the commissioner in dealing with the complaint; or
a request for information relevant to the complaint under section 78 (2)
the commissioner is satisfied on reasonable grounds the complainant, without a reasonable excuse, has not cooperated in the commissioner’s dealing with the complaint; or
the commissioner can not make contact with the complainant.
The commissioner may defer dealing with a complaint if—
the complainant has complained to the public entity as required under section 65 but the commissioner considers the public entity has not yet had an adequate opportunity to deal with the complaint; or
the commissioner considers it is necessary to do so to ensure the complaint is dealt with appropriately under another law.
In this section—
law includes—
the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cwlth) or another law of the Commonwealth; and
a law of another State.
(sec.70-ssec.1) The commissioner may refuse to deal or to continue to deal with a human rights complaint if— the commissioner considers there is a more appropriate course of action available under another law to deal with the subject of the complaint; or the commissioner considers the subject of the complaint has been appropriately dealt with by another entity; or the commissioner considers the requirements under section 65 for making the complaint have not been met; or the complaint was not made or referred to the commissioner within 1 year after the alleged contravention to which the complaint relates happened.
(sec.70-ssec.2) The commissioner may refuse to continue to deal with a human rights complaint if— the complainant does not comply with a reasonable request made by the commissioner in dealing with the complaint; or a request for information relevant to the complaint under section 78 (2) the commissioner is satisfied on reasonable grounds the complainant, without a reasonable excuse, has not cooperated in the commissioner’s dealing with the complaint; or the commissioner can not make contact with the complainant.
(sec.70-ssec.3) The commissioner may defer dealing with a complaint if— the complainant has complained to the public entity as required under section 65 but the commissioner considers the public entity has not yet had an adequate opportunity to deal with the complaint; or the commissioner considers it is necessary to do so to ensure the complaint is dealt with appropriately under another law.
(sec.70-ssec.4) In this section— law includes— the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cwlth) or another law of the Commonwealth; and a law of another State.
(a) the commissioner considers there is a more appropriate course of action available under another law to deal with the subject of the complaint; or
(b) the commissioner considers the subject of the complaint has been appropriately dealt with by another entity; or
(c) the commissioner considers the requirements under section 65 for making the complaint have not been met; or
(d) the complaint was not made or referred to the commissioner within 1 year after the alleged contravention to which the complaint relates happened.
(a) the complainant does not comply with a reasonable request made by the commissioner in dealing with the complaint; or Example of a reasonable request— a request for information relevant to the complaint under section 78 (2)
(b) the commissioner is satisfied on reasonable grounds the complainant, without a reasonable excuse, has not cooperated in the commissioner’s dealing with the complaint; or
(c) the commissioner can not make contact with the complainant.
(a) the complainant has complained to the public entity as required under section 65 but the commissioner considers the public entity has not yet had an adequate opportunity to deal with the complaint; or
(b) the commissioner considers it is necessary to do so to ensure the complaint is dealt with appropriately under another law.
(a) the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cwlth) or another law of the Commonwealth; and
(b) a law of another State.
sec.71
Notice about refusing to deal, or deferring dealing, with complaint
sec.71 Notice about refusing to deal, or deferring dealing, with complaint
If the commissioner refuses to deal, or to continue to deal, with a human rights complaint or defers dealing with a complaint, the commissioner must give the complainant and respondent notice of the refusal or deferral and the reasons for the refusal or deferral.
However, the commissioner need not give the notice to the respondent if the commissioner considers it is not appropriate in the circumstances to do so.
The respondent is not aware of the complaint or has not been contacted by the commissioner in relation to the complaint.
(sec.71-ssec.1) If the commissioner refuses to deal, or to continue to deal, with a human rights complaint or defers dealing with a complaint, the commissioner must give the complainant and respondent notice of the refusal or deferral and the reasons for the refusal or deferral.
(sec.71-ssec.2) However, the commissioner need not give the notice to the respondent if the commissioner considers it is not appropriate in the circumstances to do so. The respondent is not aware of the complaint or has not been contacted by the commissioner in relation to the complaint.
sec.72
When complaint lapses
sec.72 When complaint lapses
If the commissioner refuses to deal, or to continue to deal, with a human rights complaint—
the complaint lapses; and
the complainant can not make a further complaint relating to the alleged contravention the subject of the complaint.
Subsection (1) (b) does not apply to a human rights complaint the commissioner refuses to deal with under section 70 (1) (c) .
(sec.72-ssec.1) If the commissioner refuses to deal, or to continue to deal, with a human rights complaint— the complaint lapses; and the complainant can not make a further complaint relating to the alleged contravention the subject of the complaint.
(sec.72-ssec.2) Subsection (1) (b) does not apply to a human rights complaint the commissioner refuses to deal with under section 70 (1) (c) .
(a) the complaint lapses; and
(b) the complainant can not make a further complaint relating to the alleged contravention the subject of the complaint.
sec.73
Commissioner may refer human rights complaint to other entities
sec.73 Commissioner may refer human rights complaint to other entities
If the subject of a human rights complaint could be the subject of a complaint under the Ombudsman Act 2001 , the commissioner may refer the human rights complaint to the ombudsman.
If the subject of a human rights complaint could be the subject of a health service complaint under the Health Ombudsman Act 2013 , the commissioner may refer the human rights complaint to the health ombudsman.
If the subject of a human rights complaint could be the subject of a complaint about corruption made under the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 , the commissioner may refer the human rights complaint to the Crime and Corruption Commission.
If the subject of a human rights complaint could be the subject of a privacy complaint under the Information Privacy Act 2009 , the commissioner may refer the human rights complaint to the information commissioner.
If the subject of a human rights complaint could be the subject of an NDIS complaint, the commissioner may refer the human rights complaint to the NDIS commissioner.
However, the commissioner may only refer a human rights complaint under this section—
with the complainant’s consent; and
if the commissioner considers the complaint would be more appropriately dealt with by the entity to whom it is referred.
If the commissioner refers a human rights complaint to an entity under this section, the commissioner—
may, with the consent of the complainant, give the entity information about the complaint obtained by the commissioner under this part; and
must give the complainant a notice stating the complaint has been referred to the entity.
In this section—
NDIS complaint means a complaint mentioned in the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cwlth) , section 181G .
(sec.73-ssec.1) If the subject of a human rights complaint could be the subject of a complaint under the Ombudsman Act 2001 , the commissioner may refer the human rights complaint to the ombudsman.
(sec.73-ssec.2) If the subject of a human rights complaint could be the subject of a health service complaint under the Health Ombudsman Act 2013 , the commissioner may refer the human rights complaint to the health ombudsman.
(sec.73-ssec.3) If the subject of a human rights complaint could be the subject of a complaint about corruption made under the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 , the commissioner may refer the human rights complaint to the Crime and Corruption Commission.
(sec.73-ssec.4) If the subject of a human rights complaint could be the subject of a privacy complaint under the Information Privacy Act 2009 , the commissioner may refer the human rights complaint to the information commissioner.
(sec.73-ssec.5) If the subject of a human rights complaint could be the subject of an NDIS complaint, the commissioner may refer the human rights complaint to the NDIS commissioner.
(sec.73-ssec.6) However, the commissioner may only refer a human rights complaint under this section— with the complainant’s consent; and if the commissioner considers the complaint would be more appropriately dealt with by the entity to whom it is referred.
(sec.73-ssec.7) If the commissioner refers a human rights complaint to an entity under this section, the commissioner— may, with the consent of the complainant, give the entity information about the complaint obtained by the commissioner under this part; and must give the complainant a notice stating the complaint has been referred to the entity.
(sec.73-ssec.8) In this section— NDIS complaint means a complaint mentioned in the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cwlth) , section 181G .
(a) with the complainant’s consent; and
(b) if the commissioner considers the complaint would be more appropriately dealt with by the entity to whom it is referred.
(a) may, with the consent of the complainant, give the entity information about the complaint obtained by the commissioner under this part; and
(b) must give the complainant a notice stating the complaint has been referred to the entity.
sec.74
Commissioner may enter into arrangements with other entities
sec.74 Commissioner may enter into arrangements with other entities
The commissioner and a referral entity may enter into an arrangement about—
the human rights complaints the commissioner should refer to the entity because they would be more appropriately dealt with by the entity; or
the complaints made under a referral Act the referral entity should refer to the commissioner because they—
relate to decisions or other actions for which the commission has jurisdiction; and
would be more appropriately dealt with by the commission under this part; or
how to deal with a complaint or other matter under a referral Act that could also form the basis of a human rights complaint; or
cooperating in the performance of the commissioner’s and the entity’s functions to ensure the effective operation of this part and a referral Act.
The commissioner and the NDIS commissioner may enter into an arrangement about—
the human rights complaints the commissioner should refer to the NDIS commissioner because they would be more appropriately dealt with by the NDIS commissioner; or
cooperating in the performance of the commissioner’s and the NDIS commissioner’s functions to ensure the effective operation of this part and the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cwlth) .
If an arrangement provides for a referral as mentioned in subsection (1) (a) or (b) or (2) (a) , the arrangement must also provide for how the referral is made.
The commissioner and an entity with whom an arrangement has been entered into under this section may perform their functions in accordance with the arrangement.
(sec.74-ssec.1) The commissioner and a referral entity may enter into an arrangement about— the human rights complaints the commissioner should refer to the entity because they would be more appropriately dealt with by the entity; or the complaints made under a referral Act the referral entity should refer to the commissioner because they— relate to decisions or other actions for which the commission has jurisdiction; and would be more appropriately dealt with by the commission under this part; or how to deal with a complaint or other matter under a referral Act that could also form the basis of a human rights complaint; or cooperating in the performance of the commissioner’s and the entity’s functions to ensure the effective operation of this part and a referral Act.
(sec.74-ssec.2) The commissioner and the NDIS commissioner may enter into an arrangement about— the human rights complaints the commissioner should refer to the NDIS commissioner because they would be more appropriately dealt with by the NDIS commissioner; or cooperating in the performance of the commissioner’s and the NDIS commissioner’s functions to ensure the effective operation of this part and the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cwlth) .
(sec.74-ssec.3) If an arrangement provides for a referral as mentioned in subsection (1) (a) or (b) or (2) (a) , the arrangement must also provide for how the referral is made.
(sec.74-ssec.4) The commissioner and an entity with whom an arrangement has been entered into under this section may perform their functions in accordance with the arrangement.
(a) the human rights complaints the commissioner should refer to the entity because they would be more appropriately dealt with by the entity; or
(b) the complaints made under a referral Act the referral entity should refer to the commissioner because they— (i) relate to decisions or other actions for which the commission has jurisdiction; and (ii) would be more appropriately dealt with by the commission under this part; or
(i) relate to decisions or other actions for which the commission has jurisdiction; and
(ii) would be more appropriately dealt with by the commission under this part; or
(c) how to deal with a complaint or other matter under a referral Act that could also form the basis of a human rights complaint; or
(d) cooperating in the performance of the commissioner’s and the entity’s functions to ensure the effective operation of this part and a referral Act.
(i) relate to decisions or other actions for which the commission has jurisdiction; and
(ii) would be more appropriately dealt with by the commission under this part; or
(a) the human rights complaints the commissioner should refer to the NDIS commissioner because they would be more appropriately dealt with by the NDIS commissioner; or
(b) cooperating in the performance of the commissioner’s and the NDIS commissioner’s functions to ensure the effective operation of this part and the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cwlth) .
sec.75
Dealing with human rights complaint under Anti-Discrimination Act 1991
sec.75 Dealing with human rights complaint under Anti-Discrimination Act 1991
This section applies if the commissioner considers a human rights complaint made or referred to the commissioner would be more appropriately dealt with by the commission as a complaint about an alleged contravention of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 .
The commissioner may, with the consent of the complainant, deal with the complaint under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 as an alleged contravention of that Act.
For dealing with the complaint as mentioned in subsection (2) , the complaint—
is taken to be a complaint about an alleged contravention of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 that is accepted by the commissioner under section 141 of that Act; and
is taken to be made on the day the human rights complaint was made or referred.
(sec.75-ssec.1) This section applies if the commissioner considers a human rights complaint made or referred to the commissioner would be more appropriately dealt with by the commission as a complaint about an alleged contravention of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 .
(sec.75-ssec.2) The commissioner may, with the consent of the complainant, deal with the complaint under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 as an alleged contravention of that Act.
(sec.75-ssec.3) For dealing with the complaint as mentioned in subsection (2) , the complaint— is taken to be a complaint about an alleged contravention of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 that is accepted by the commissioner under section 141 of that Act; and is taken to be made on the day the human rights complaint was made or referred.
(a) is taken to be a complaint about an alleged contravention of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 that is accepted by the commissioner under section 141 of that Act; and
(b) is taken to be made on the day the human rights complaint was made or referred.
sec.76
Acceptance of human rights complaint by commissioner
sec.76 Acceptance of human rights complaint by commissioner
If the commissioner decides to accept a human rights complaint for resolution by the commission, the commissioner must give the complainant and respondent notice of its acceptance.
The notice must state—
the role of the commission in trying to resolve the complaint; and
the powers the commissioner may exercise in trying to resolve the complaint.
The notice given to the respondent must also state—
the substance of the complaint; and
that the respondent will be given an opportunity to make submissions in writing in response to the complaint; and
that the respondent must advise the commissioner of the respondent’s address for service; and
that the commissioner may seek information or documents from the respondent in relation to the complaint.
(sec.76-ssec.1) If the commissioner decides to accept a human rights complaint for resolution by the commission, the commissioner must give the complainant and respondent notice of its acceptance.
(sec.76-ssec.2) The notice must state— the role of the commission in trying to resolve the complaint; and the powers the commissioner may exercise in trying to resolve the complaint.
(sec.76-ssec.3) The notice given to the respondent must also state— the substance of the complaint; and that the respondent will be given an opportunity to make submissions in writing in response to the complaint; and that the respondent must advise the commissioner of the respondent’s address for service; and that the commissioner may seek information or documents from the respondent in relation to the complaint.
(a) the role of the commission in trying to resolve the complaint; and
(b) the powers the commissioner may exercise in trying to resolve the complaint.
(a) the substance of the complaint; and
(b) that the respondent will be given an opportunity to make submissions in writing in response to the complaint; and
(c) that the respondent must advise the commissioner of the respondent’s address for service; and
(d) that the commissioner may seek information or documents from the respondent in relation to the complaint.
sec.77
Dealing with human rights complaint—generally
sec.77 Dealing with human rights complaint—generally
If the commissioner decides to accept a human rights complaint for resolution by the commission, the commissioner may take the reasonable action the commissioner considers appropriate to try to resolve the complaint.
Without limiting subsection (1) , the commissioner may—
ask the respondent to make submissions to the commission in writing in response to the complaint; or
give the complainant a copy of the respondent’s written submissions; or
ask or direct the complainant or respondent to give the commissioner information relevant to the complaint, including under section 78 ; or
make enquiries of, and discuss the complaint with, the complainant and the respondent; or
cause the complaint to be conciliated under subdivision 4 .
(sec.77-ssec.1) If the commissioner decides to accept a human rights complaint for resolution by the commission, the commissioner may take the reasonable action the commissioner considers appropriate to try to resolve the complaint.
(sec.77-ssec.2) Without limiting subsection (1) , the commissioner may— ask the respondent to make submissions to the commission in writing in response to the complaint; or give the complainant a copy of the respondent’s written submissions; or ask or direct the complainant or respondent to give the commissioner information relevant to the complaint, including under section 78 ; or make enquiries of, and discuss the complaint with, the complainant and the respondent; or cause the complaint to be conciliated under subdivision 4 .
(a) ask the respondent to make submissions to the commission in writing in response to the complaint; or
(b) give the complainant a copy of the respondent’s written submissions; or
(c) ask or direct the complainant or respondent to give the commissioner information relevant to the complaint, including under section 78 ; or
(d) make enquiries of, and discuss the complaint with, the complainant and the respondent; or
(e) cause the complaint to be conciliated under subdivision 4 .
sec.78
Commissioner may ask or direct relevant entity to give information
sec.78 Commissioner may ask or direct relevant entity to give information
This section applies in relation to the commissioner for making preliminary inquiries under section 68 or dealing with a human rights complaint under this division.
The commissioner may, by notice given to a relevant entity for the complaint, ask or direct the entity to give the commissioner information about the complaint within the reasonable period stated in the notice.
The notice must state the purpose for making the request.
For information in an electronic document, compliance with the request or direction requires the giving of a clear image or written version of the electronic document.
The entity must comply with a direction unless the entity has a reasonable excuse.
It is a reasonable excuse for an entity to fail to comply with a direction because, for example, complying with the direction would require the entity to disclose information that is the subject of legal professional privilege.
The commissioner may enforce a direction by filing a copy of it with a court of competent jurisdiction.
The direction is then enforceable as if it were an order of the court.
In this section—
information includes a document.
relevant entity , for a human rights complaint, means—
the complainant or respondent for the complaint; or
another entity the commissioner considers has information relevant to the complaint in the entity’s possession or control.
(sec.78-ssec.1) This section applies in relation to the commissioner for making preliminary inquiries under section 68 or dealing with a human rights complaint under this division.
(sec.78-ssec.2) The commissioner may, by notice given to a relevant entity for the complaint, ask or direct the entity to give the commissioner information about the complaint within the reasonable period stated in the notice.
(sec.78-ssec.3) The notice must state the purpose for making the request.
(sec.78-ssec.4) For information in an electronic document, compliance with the request or direction requires the giving of a clear image or written version of the electronic document.
(sec.78-ssec.5) The entity must comply with a direction unless the entity has a reasonable excuse.
(sec.78-ssec.6) It is a reasonable excuse for an entity to fail to comply with a direction because, for example, complying with the direction would require the entity to disclose information that is the subject of legal professional privilege.
(sec.78-ssec.7) The commissioner may enforce a direction by filing a copy of it with a court of competent jurisdiction.
(sec.78-ssec.8) The direction is then enforceable as if it were an order of the court.
(sec.78-ssec.9) In this section— information includes a document. relevant entity , for a human rights complaint, means— the complainant or respondent for the complaint; or another entity the commissioner considers has information relevant to the complaint in the entity’s possession or control.
(a) the complainant or respondent for the complaint; or
(b) another entity the commissioner considers has information relevant to the complaint in the entity’s possession or control.
sec.79
Commissioner may conduct conciliation conference
sec.79 Commissioner may conduct conciliation conference
If the commissioner decides to accept a human rights complaint for resolution by the commission, the commissioner may conduct a conference (a conciliation conference ) under this subdivision for the purpose of conciliating the complaint.
sec.80
Purpose of conciliation
sec.80 Purpose of conciliation
The purpose of conciliation of a human rights complaint is to promote the resolution of the complaint in a way that is informal, quick and efficient.
sec.81
Attendance at conciliation conference
sec.81 Attendance at conciliation conference
The commissioner may direct a person to take part in a conciliation conference.
The commissioner may enforce the direction by filing a copy of it with a court of competent jurisdiction.
The direction is then enforceable as if it were an order of the court.
(sec.81-ssec.1) The commissioner may direct a person to take part in a conciliation conference.
(sec.81-ssec.2) The commissioner may enforce the direction by filing a copy of it with a court of competent jurisdiction.
(sec.81-ssec.3) The direction is then enforceable as if it were an order of the court.
sec.82
Attendance by complainant
sec.82 Attendance by complainant
The complainant for a human rights complaint the subject of conciliation must attend the conciliation conference in person unless—
the complainant is a child or a person with impaired capacity; or
the commissioner consents to another person attending the conciliation conference for the complainant.
The complainant may, with the commissioner’s consent, be accompanied at the conciliation conference by a support person.
In this section—
impaired capacity see the Guardianship and Administration Act 2000 , schedule 4 .
(sec.82-ssec.1) The complainant for a human rights complaint the subject of conciliation must attend the conciliation conference in person unless— the complainant is a child or a person with impaired capacity; or the commissioner consents to another person attending the conciliation conference for the complainant.
(sec.82-ssec.2) The complainant may, with the commissioner’s consent, be accompanied at the conciliation conference by a support person.
(sec.82-ssec.3) In this section— impaired capacity see the Guardianship and Administration Act 2000 , schedule 4 .
(a) the complainant is a child or a person with impaired capacity; or
(b) the commissioner consents to another person attending the conciliation conference for the complainant.
sec.83
Representation
sec.83 Representation
A person may be represented by another person (a representative ) at a conciliation conference only with the commissioner’s consent.
The commissioner may give consent for subsection (1) if satisfied—
it is appropriate in the circumstances for the person to be represented; and
the person’s representation by the representative would help the conciliation; and
the representative has sufficient knowledge of matters relating to the complaint to effectively represent the person.
The commissioner may—
give the consent on conditions the commissioner considers reasonable; and
withdraw the consent if the person or the representative does not comply with the conditions.
(sec.83-ssec.1) A person may be represented by another person (a representative ) at a conciliation conference only with the commissioner’s consent.
(sec.83-ssec.2) The commissioner may give consent for subsection (1) if satisfied— it is appropriate in the circumstances for the person to be represented; and the person’s representation by the representative would help the conciliation; and the representative has sufficient knowledge of matters relating to the complaint to effectively represent the person.
(sec.83-ssec.3) The commissioner may— give the consent on conditions the commissioner considers reasonable; and withdraw the consent if the person or the representative does not comply with the conditions.
(a) it is appropriate in the circumstances for the person to be represented; and
(b) the person’s representation by the representative would help the conciliation; and
(c) the representative has sufficient knowledge of matters relating to the complaint to effectively represent the person.
(a) give the consent on conditions the commissioner considers reasonable; and
(b) withdraw the consent if the person or the representative does not comply with the conditions.
sec.84
Use of interpreters and other persons
sec.84 Use of interpreters and other persons
A person may be helped at a conciliation conference by—
an interpreter; or
another person necessary or desirable to make the conciliation conference intelligible to the person, including, for example, a person with appropriate cultural or social knowledge and experience.
(a) an interpreter; or
(b) another person necessary or desirable to make the conciliation conference intelligible to the person, including, for example, a person with appropriate cultural or social knowledge and experience.
sec.85
Conduct of conciliation conference
sec.85 Conduct of conciliation conference
In conducting a conciliation conference, the commissioner is not bound by the rules of evidence.
A conciliation conference must be held in private.
(sec.85-ssec.1) In conducting a conciliation conference, the commissioner is not bound by the rules of evidence.
(sec.85-ssec.2) A conciliation conference must be held in private.
sec.86
Confidentiality of conciliation conference
sec.86 Confidentiality of conciliation conference
Nothing said or done in the course of a conciliation conference for a human rights complaint is admissible in any criminal, civil or administrative proceeding, unless the complainant and respondent for the complaint agree.
sec.87
Conciliation does not affect other rights
sec.87 Conciliation does not affect other rights
A person’s participation in a conciliation conference under this division does not affect a right the person may have to seek any relief or remedy the person may have in relation to a contravention of section 58 (1) .
sec.88
Report about unresolved human rights complaint
sec.88 Report about unresolved human rights complaint
This section applies in relation to a human rights complaint accepted by the commissioner for resolution by the commission if the commissioner considers the complaint has not been resolved by conciliation or otherwise.
The commissioner must prepare a report about the complaint as soon as practicable after the commission has finished dealing with the complaint.
The report must include—
the substance of the complaint; and
the actions taken to try to resolve the complaint.
The report may include details of action the commissioner considers the respondent for the complaint should take to ensure its acts and decisions are compatible with human rights.
The commissioner must give a copy of the report to the complainant and respondent.
The report is not admissible in a proceeding in relation to a contravention of this Act, unless the complainant and respondent agree.
(sec.88-ssec.1) This section applies in relation to a human rights complaint accepted by the commissioner for resolution by the commission if the commissioner considers the complaint has not been resolved by conciliation or otherwise.
(sec.88-ssec.2) The commissioner must prepare a report about the complaint as soon as practicable after the commission has finished dealing with the complaint.
(sec.88-ssec.3) The report must include— the substance of the complaint; and the actions taken to try to resolve the complaint.
(sec.88-ssec.4) The report may include details of action the commissioner considers the respondent for the complaint should take to ensure its acts and decisions are compatible with human rights.
(sec.88-ssec.5) The commissioner must give a copy of the report to the complainant and respondent.
(sec.88-ssec.6) The report is not admissible in a proceeding in relation to a contravention of this Act, unless the complainant and respondent agree.
(a) the substance of the complaint; and
(b) the actions taken to try to resolve the complaint.
sec.89
Notice about resolved human rights complaint
sec.89 Notice about resolved human rights complaint
This section applies in relation to a human rights complaint accepted by the commissioner for resolution by the commission if the commissioner considers the complaint has been resolved.
The commissioner must, as soon as practicable after the complaint is resolved, give the complainant and respondent a notice stating—
the outcome of the resolution of the complaint; and
that the commission has finished dealing with the complaint.
(sec.89-ssec.1) This section applies in relation to a human rights complaint accepted by the commissioner for resolution by the commission if the commissioner considers the complaint has been resolved.
(sec.89-ssec.2) The commissioner must, as soon as practicable after the complaint is resolved, give the complainant and respondent a notice stating— the outcome of the resolution of the complaint; and that the commission has finished dealing with the complaint.
(a) the outcome of the resolution of the complaint; and
(b) that the commission has finished dealing with the complaint.
sec.90
Commissioner may publish information
sec.90 Commissioner may publish information
The commissioner may publish information about a human rights complaint that the commission has finished dealing with.
The publication—
may include the substance of the complaint; and
may draw on information about the complaint contained in a report prepared under section 88 or a notice given under section 89 ; and
must not include personal information about an individual unless the information has previously been published, or given for the purpose of publication, by the individual.
(sec.90-ssec.1) The commissioner may publish information about a human rights complaint that the commission has finished dealing with.
(sec.90-ssec.2) The publication— may include the substance of the complaint; and may draw on information about the complaint contained in a report prepared under section 88 or a notice given under section 89 ; and must not include personal information about an individual unless the information has previously been published, or given for the purpose of publication, by the individual.
(a) may include the substance of the complaint; and
(b) may draw on information about the complaint contained in a report prepared under section 88 or a notice given under section 89 ; and
(c) must not include personal information about an individual unless the information has previously been published, or given for the purpose of publication, by the individual.
pt.4-div.3
Reporting requirements
Reporting requirements
sec.91
Annual report
sec.91 Annual report
As soon as practicable after the end of each financial year, the commissioner must prepare a report (an annual report ) about the operation of this Act during the year.
The report must include the following information for the financial year—
details of any examination of the interaction between this Act and other Acts, statutory instruments and the common law;
details of all declarations of incompatibility made;
details of all override declarations made;
details of all interventions by the Attorney-General or the commission under section 50 or 51 ;
the number of human rights complaints made or referred to the commissioner;
the outcome of human rights complaints accepted by the commissioner for resolution by the commission, including whether or not the complaints were resolved by conciliation or otherwise;
the number of human rights complaints resolved by the commission;
the number of conciliation conferences conducted under this part;
the number of public entities that were asked or directed to take part in a conciliation conference, and the number that failed to comply with a direction to take part;
the number of human rights complaints received by particular public entities decided by the commissioner.
The report may include other information the commissioner considers appropriate, including, for example, the names of public entities and details of action, mentioned in section 88 (4) , relating to human rights complaints that have not been resolved.
However, the report must not include personal information about an individual unless the information has previously been published, or given for the purpose of publication, by the individual.
The commissioner must give the report to the Attorney-General as soon as practicable after it is prepared.
(sec.91-ssec.1) As soon as practicable after the end of each financial year, the commissioner must prepare a report (an annual report ) about the operation of this Act during the year.
(sec.91-ssec.2) The report must include the following information for the financial year— details of any examination of the interaction between this Act and other Acts, statutory instruments and the common law; details of all declarations of incompatibility made; details of all override declarations made; details of all interventions by the Attorney-General or the commission under section 50 or 51 ; the number of human rights complaints made or referred to the commissioner; the outcome of human rights complaints accepted by the commissioner for resolution by the commission, including whether or not the complaints were resolved by conciliation or otherwise; the number of human rights complaints resolved by the commission; the number of conciliation conferences conducted under this part; the number of public entities that were asked or directed to take part in a conciliation conference, and the number that failed to comply with a direction to take part; the number of human rights complaints received by particular public entities decided by the commissioner.
(sec.91-ssec.3) The report may include other information the commissioner considers appropriate, including, for example, the names of public entities and details of action, mentioned in section 88 (4) , relating to human rights complaints that have not been resolved.
(sec.91-ssec.4) However, the report must not include personal information about an individual unless the information has previously been published, or given for the purpose of publication, by the individual.
(sec.91-ssec.5) The commissioner must give the report to the Attorney-General as soon as practicable after it is prepared.
(a) details of any examination of the interaction between this Act and other Acts, statutory instruments and the common law;
(b) details of all declarations of incompatibility made;
(c) details of all override declarations made;
(d) details of all interventions by the Attorney-General or the commission under section 50 or 51 ;
(e) the number of human rights complaints made or referred to the commissioner;
(f) the outcome of human rights complaints accepted by the commissioner for resolution by the commission, including whether or not the complaints were resolved by conciliation or otherwise;
(g) the number of human rights complaints resolved by the commission;
(h) the number of conciliation conferences conducted under this part;
(i) the number of public entities that were asked or directed to take part in a conciliation conference, and the number that failed to comply with a direction to take part;
(j) the number of human rights complaints received by particular public entities decided by the commissioner.
sec.92
Other reports
sec.92 Other reports
The commissioner may prepare a report about a matter relevant to the performance of the commission’s or the commissioner’s functions under this Act.
The commissioner must, if asked by the Attorney-General, prepare a report about a matter mentioned in subsection (1) .
The commissioner must give a report prepared under subsection (2) to the Attorney-General as soon as practicable after it is prepared.
A report prepared under this section must not include personal information about an individual unless the information has previously been published, or given for the purpose of publication, by the individual.
(sec.92-ssec.1) The commissioner may prepare a report about a matter relevant to the performance of the commission’s or the commissioner’s functions under this Act.
(sec.92-ssec.2) The commissioner must, if asked by the Attorney-General, prepare a report about a matter mentioned in subsection (1) .
(sec.92-ssec.3) The commissioner must give a report prepared under subsection (2) to the Attorney-General as soon as practicable after it is prepared.
(sec.92-ssec.4) A report prepared under this section must not include personal information about an individual unless the information has previously been published, or given for the purpose of publication, by the individual.
sec.93
Report containing adverse comment
sec.93 Report containing adverse comment
This section applies if the commissioner proposes to make an adverse comment about a person in a report prepared under section 88 or this division.
Before preparing the report, the commissioner must give the person an opportunity to make submissions to the commissioner about the proposed adverse comment.
If the person makes submissions and the commissioner still proposes to make the adverse comment, the commissioner must ensure the person’s response is fairly stated in the report.
For this section, an adverse comment does not include a statement that a public entity did not participate in resolving a human rights complaint.
(sec.93-ssec.1) This section applies if the commissioner proposes to make an adverse comment about a person in a report prepared under section 88 or this division.
(sec.93-ssec.2) Before preparing the report, the commissioner must give the person an opportunity to make submissions to the commissioner about the proposed adverse comment.
(sec.93-ssec.3) If the person makes submissions and the commissioner still proposes to make the adverse comment, the commissioner must ensure the person’s response is fairly stated in the report.
(sec.93-ssec.4) For this section, an adverse comment does not include a statement that a public entity did not participate in resolving a human rights complaint.
sec.94
Attorney-General to table reports
sec.94 Attorney-General to table reports
The Attorney-General must table a copy of each annual report, and each report given to the Attorney-General under section 92 (3) , in the Legislative Assembly within 6 sitting days after receiving the report.
pt.5
General
General
sec.95
First review of Act
sec.95 First review of Act
The Attorney-General must ensure the operation of this Act before 1 July 2023 is reviewed as soon as practicable after that date.
The review must be carried out by an independent and appropriately qualified person.
The terms of reference for the review are the terms decided by the Attorney-General.
The review must include consideration of the following—
whether additional human rights should be included as human rights under this Act, including, but not limited to, rights under—
the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; or
the Convention on the Rights of the Child; or
the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; or
the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women;
whether further or different provision should be made in this Act about proceedings that may be brought or remedies that may be awarded in relation to acts or decisions of public entities made unlawful because of this Act;
whether the amendments made by this Act to the Corrective Services Act 2006 and the Youth Justice Act 1992 are operating effectively, or further or different provision should be made for the interrelationship between this Act and those Acts.
The Attorney-General must table a copy of the report about the outcome of the review in the Legislative Assembly within 14 sitting days after receiving the report.
(sec.95-ssec.1) The Attorney-General must ensure the operation of this Act before 1 July 2023 is reviewed as soon as practicable after that date.
(sec.95-ssec.2) The review must be carried out by an independent and appropriately qualified person.
(sec.95-ssec.3) The terms of reference for the review are the terms decided by the Attorney-General.
(sec.95-ssec.4) The review must include consideration of the following— whether additional human rights should be included as human rights under this Act, including, but not limited to, rights under— the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; or the Convention on the Rights of the Child; or the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; or the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women; whether further or different provision should be made in this Act about proceedings that may be brought or remedies that may be awarded in relation to acts or decisions of public entities made unlawful because of this Act; whether the amendments made by this Act to the Corrective Services Act 2006 and the Youth Justice Act 1992 are operating effectively, or further or different provision should be made for the interrelationship between this Act and those Acts.
(sec.95-ssec.5) The Attorney-General must table a copy of the report about the outcome of the review in the Legislative Assembly within 14 sitting days after receiving the report.
(a) whether additional human rights should be included as human rights under this Act, including, but not limited to, rights under— (i) the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; or (ii) the Convention on the Rights of the Child; or (iii) the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; or (iv) the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women;
(i) the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; or
(ii) the Convention on the Rights of the Child; or
(iii) the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; or
(iv) the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women;
(b) whether further or different provision should be made in this Act about proceedings that may be brought or remedies that may be awarded in relation to acts or decisions of public entities made unlawful because of this Act;
(c) whether the amendments made by this Act to the Corrective Services Act 2006 and the Youth Justice Act 1992 are operating effectively, or further or different provision should be made for the interrelationship between this Act and those Acts.
(i) the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; or
(ii) the Convention on the Rights of the Child; or
(iii) the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; or
(iv) the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women;
More sections below
Source text: opening excerpt
Sourced from Queensland Legislation (legislation.qld.gov.au), CC BY 4.0.
pt.1 Preliminary
Preliminary
pt.1-div.1 Introduction
Introduction
sec.1 Short title
sec.1 Short title
This Act may be cited as the Human Rights Act 2019 .
sec.2 Commencement
sec.2 Commencement
This Act commences on a day to be fixed by proclamation.
sec.3 Main objects of Act
sec.3 Main objects of Act
The main objects of this Act are—
to protect and promote human rights; and
to help build a culture in the Queensland public sector that respects and promotes human rights; and
to help promote a dialogue about the nature, meaning and scope of human rights.
(a) to protect and promote human rights; and
(b) to help build a culture in the Queensland public sector that respects and promotes human rights; and
(c) to help promote a dialogue about the nature, meaning and scope of human rights.
sec.4 How main objects are primarily achieved
sec.4 How main objects are primarily achieved
The main objects are to be achieved primarily by—
stating the human rights Parliament specifically seeks to protect and promote; and
requiring public entities to act and make decisions in a way compatible with human rights; and
requiring statements of compatibility with human rights to be tabled in the Legislative Assembly for all Bills introduced in the Assembly; and
providing for a portfolio committee responsible for examining a Bill introduced in the Legislative Assembly to consider whether the Bill is compatible with human rights; and
providing for Parliament, in exceptional circumstances, to override the application of this Act to a statutory provision; and
requiring courts and tribunals to interpret statutory provisions, to the extent possible that is consistent with their purpose, in a way compatible with human rights; and
conferring jurisdiction on the Supreme Court to declare that a statutory provision can not be interpreted in a way compatible with human rights; and
providing for a Minister and a portfolio committee to report to the Legislative Assembly about declarations of incompatibility; and
providing for how to resolve human rights complaints; and
providing for the Queensland Human Rights Commission to carry out particular functions under this Act, including, for example, to promote an understanding and acceptance of human rights and this Act in Queensland.
(a) stating the human rights Parliament specifically seeks to protect and promote; and
Part 3 Division 1 imposes upstream scrutiny on the legislative process. A member introducing a Bill must prepare and table a statement of compatibility (s 38). Portfolio committees must consider compatibility when examining Bills (s 39) and may be asked to examine non-Queensland laws (s 40). Subordinate legislation requires a human rights certificate from the responsible Minister (s 41), with exemptions for certain proclamations and prescribed instruments. Failure to comply with these requirements does not affect the validity of the resulting law (s 42).
Division 2 permits Parliament, in "exceptional circumstances" such as war or a state of emergency (s 43(4)), to make an override declaration so that an Act or provision operates despite incompatibility (s 43). Such declarations expire after five years unless re-enacted (s 45) and require a statement explaining the exceptional circumstances (s 44). An override declaration suspends the interpretive obligation in s 48 and prevents a declaration of incompatibility (s 45(1)).
Division 3 contains the interpretive rule. Section 48(1) requires all statutory provisions to be interpreted, to the extent possible consistent with their purpose, in a way compatible with human rights. If that is not possible, the provision must be interpreted in the way most compatible with human rights (s 48(2)). International law and domestic, foreign and international jurisprudence may be considered (s 48(3)). The rule does not affect validity of incompatible legislation (s 48(4)) and does not apply to overridden provisions (s 48(5)). Questions of interpretation or application may be referred to the Supreme Court (s 49), the Attorney-General and the Commission may intervene (ss 50-51), and notice must be given (s 52). If the Supreme Court concludes a provision cannot be interpreted compatibly, it may issue a declaration of incompatibility (s 53). Such a declaration has no effect on validity or on any person's legal rights (s 54) but triggers a reporting obligation: the relevant Minister must table the declaration and a response within six months (s 56), and a portfolio committee must report within three months (s 57).
Part 4 establishes the role of the Queensland Human Rights Commission. The Commission’s functions include dealing with human rights complaints, reviewing the effect of laws on rights when asked by the Attorney-General, reviewing public entity policies for compatibility, promoting understanding of human rights, providing education, and advising the Attorney-General (s 61). Complaints may be made by the affected individual, an agent, or an authorised person (s 64). A complaint must first have been made to the public entity and at least 45 business days must have passed without an adequate response (s 65), although the Commissioner may accept earlier complaints in exceptional circumstances. The Commissioner must refuse frivolous or vexatious complaints (s 69) and may refuse or defer others on grounds including alternative remedies, prior handling by another entity, time limits, or lack of cooperation (s 70).
Accepted complaints are dealt with by seeking submissions, making enquiries, directing production of information (s 78, enforceable by court order), and, where appropriate, conducting confidential conciliation conferences (ss 79-87). If unresolved, the Commissioner must issue a report that may recommend action (s 88). Resolved complaints result in a notice of outcome (s 89). The Commissioner may publish de-identified information (s 90). Annual reports must contain detailed statistics on complaints, declarations of incompatibility, override declarations and interventions (s 91). Public entities required to produce financial annual reports must report on actions taken to further the Act’s objects, complaints received, and compatibility reviews (s 97).
The Act binds all persons including the State and, to the extent of legislative power, the Commonwealth and other States (s 5). It commenced by proclamation (s 2) and applies to all Acts and statutory instruments whenever made, but does not affect proceedings concluded before commencement or pre-commencement acts or decisions of public entities (s 108). Savings provisions preserve laws on termination of pregnancy (s 106) and native title (s 107).
Who it affects
The Act directly affects every individual in Queensland, who are stated to "have" the rights in Part 2 (s 11(1)). Corporations do not have human rights (s 11(2)). The primary duty-bearers are "public entities" as defined in s 9. This definition is deliberately broad and functional. It includes government entities under the Public Sector Act 2022 s 276, public service employees, the Queensland Police Service, local governments, councillors, local government employees, Ministers, entities established under an Act when performing functions of a public nature, portfolio committee members acting in an administrative capacity, entities performing public functions for the State or another public entity (including under contract), staff and executive officers of public entities, and entities prescribed by regulation. It also expressly includes registered NDIS providers performing public functions in the State and non-State police officers when acting as special constables or exercising police powers.
Exclusions are equally important: the Legislative Assembly and persons performing functions in connection with Assembly proceedings are excluded except when acting in an administrative capacity; courts and tribunals are excluded except in administrative capacity; non-State schools are not public entities merely because they educate students; and entities may be prescribed by regulation as excluded. Section 10 supplies a non-exhaustive list of factors for determining whether a function is "of a public nature": statutory conferral, connection to government functions, regulatory character, public funding, and government-owned corporation status. Specific examples given include operation of corrective services facilities, provision of emergency services, public health, public disability services, public education, public transport, and social housing.
Public entities are therefore the main addressees of the s 58 obligation. However, the Act also affects Parliament (through scrutiny and override provisions), courts and tribunals (through the interpretive rule in s 48, referral jurisdiction in s 49, and administrative functions), the Supreme Court (declaration of incompatibility jurisdiction under s 53), the Attorney-General (intervention, notice, tabling and response obligations), the Queensland Human Rights Commission (complaints handling, reviews, education and reporting), and portfolio committees (scrutiny and reporting roles). Ministers preparing statements of compatibility or human rights certificates are directly regulated.
Because the interpretive rule applies to all statutory provisions, the Act indirectly affects every person who is subject to, or seeks to rely on, Queensland legislation. Private entities that contract with public entities to perform public functions may be caught as public entities while performing those functions. The Commission’s power to review policies, programs and practices (s 61(c)) and to request information for its reports (s 98) brings a wide range of public sector bodies within its oversight. Finally, the obligation on certain public entities to include human rights information in their annual reports (s 97) affects all entities subject to Financial Accountability Act 2009 s 63 reporting requirements.
Key duties and rights
Rights of individuals: Part 2 Division 2 lists civil and political rights largely drawn from the ICCPR. These include recognition and equality before the law (s 15, with positive measures for disadvantaged groups not constituting discrimination), the right to life and not to be arbitrarily deprived of it (s 16), protection from torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, and non-consensual medical experimentation (s 17), freedom from slavery, servitude and forced labour (s 18, with detailed exceptions for lawful detention, work and development orders, emergencies and normal civil obligations), freedom of movement and residence (s 19), freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief including manifestation (s 20, with a prohibition on coercion), freedom of expression including seeking, receiving and imparting information in any medium (s 21), peaceful assembly and freedom of association including trade unions (s 22), taking part in public affairs, voting and access to public office without discrimination (s 23), property rights (s 24), privacy and reputation (s 25), protection of families and children including birth registration (s 26), cultural rights generally (s 27) and distinct cultural rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples (s 28, including rights to maintain identity, language, kinship, connection to country and to be free from forced assimilation). Liberty and security rights (s 29) contain detailed guarantees on arrest, detention, prompt judicial review, presumption of innocence, minimum guarantees in criminal proceedings, rights of children in the criminal process, double jeopardy (s 34) and non-retrospectivity (s 35). Division 3 adds economic, social and cultural rights to education (s 36) and health services, including emergency treatment (s 37).
Duties on public entities: The cardinal duty is s 58(1). It is unlawful to act or decide incompatibly with human rights or to fail to give proper consideration to relevant rights. Proper consideration is not a mere box-ticking exercise; s 58(5) requires identification of affected rights and an assessment of compatibility. The duty is subject to the statutory-imperative defence in s 58(2) and the religious-body exception in s 58(3). Acts of a private nature are exempt (s 58(4)). Importantly, breach does not invalidate the act or decision, nor create an offence (s 58(6)).
Legislative duties: Members introducing Bills must prepare statements of compatibility (s 38). Responsible Ministers must prepare human rights certificates for subordinate legislation (s 41). Parliament may make override declarations but is exhorted to do so only in exceptional circumstances (s 43(4)).
Interpretive duty: All courts and tribunals must interpret statutory provisions compatibly with human rights to the extent possible consistent with purpose (s 48(1)-(2)). This is a strong but purpose-constrained rule. International and comparative jurisprudence is admissible (s 48(3)).
Commission duties: The Commission must deal with complaints (s 61(a)), promote understanding, provide education, review laws and policies when requested, and report annually (s 91). It has information-gathering powers (s 78) and may conduct conciliation (s 79).
Complainant rights: Individuals (or their agents) who believe a public entity has contravened s 58 may complain after first raising the matter with the entity and allowing 45 business days (s 65). They are entitled to notice, an opportunity to participate in conciliation, and, if unresolved, a report. They may seek relief or remedy for unlawfulness under s 58 in addition to other available grounds (s 59(2)), although damages are barred for the s 58 ground alone (s 59(3)).
Penalties and enforcement
The Act is not primarily criminal. The only offence provisions are collateral: failure to comply with a direction to give information under s 78 (enforceable as a court order), failure to comply with a direction to attend conciliation (s 81), breach of an anonymity direction (s 100, 35 penalty units for individuals, 170 for corporations), and the 100 penalty unit maximum for failure to provide information requested for annual reports under s 98(3).
Enforcement of the s 58 obligation is through civil proceedings. Section 59(1)-(2) provides that if a person could seek relief or remedy on any other ground of unlawfulness, they may also rely on the ground of unlawfulness arising under s 58, even if they would not succeed on the other ground. However, damages may not be awarded on the s 58 ground (s 59(3)). Other remedies—judicial review, declarations, injunctions, stays, exclusion of evidence—remain available (s 59(4)). Proceedings for offences under the Act are governed by the procedure in Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 s 226 (s 101).
The interpretive rule in s 48 is enforced through ordinary litigation; a party may raise incompatibility and invite the court to interpret the provision compatibly. If the Supreme Court cannot do so, it may make a declaration of incompatibility (s 53), which has no legal effect on validity but triggers parliamentary reporting obligations (ss 55-57).
The Commission’s powers are largely facilitative. It may direct attendance at conciliation or production of information, and file the direction in a court to make it enforceable as an order (ss 78, 81). Refusal to deal with a complaint is reviewable only on ordinary administrative law grounds; the Act does not create a statutory right of review. Annual reporting obligations on public entities (s 97) are enforced through the ordinary accountability mechanisms applicable to those entities under the Financial Accountability Act 2009.
Override declarations and declarations of incompatibility are political rather than legal sanctions. An override declaration suspends the Act’s application for up to five years (s 45). A declaration of incompatibility requires a ministerial response and portfolio committee report but does not invalidate the law (s 54).
How it interacts with other laws
The Act is expressly intended to operate alongside, and not to abrogate, existing rights (s 12). It therefore sits atop the existing statute book and common law. The interpretive rule in s 48 applies to all statutory provisions, including the Act itself, but cannot override clear statutory purpose. Where another statute expressly authorises conduct that would otherwise breach s 58, the defence in s 58(2) will usually apply.
Specific interaction provisions exist. The Act does not affect laws relating to termination of pregnancy (s 106). Native title is preserved and the Act must be interpreted consistently with the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (s 107). The Commission may deal with a human rights complaint under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 if it considers that Act more appropriate, and the complaint is then treated as having been accepted under that Act (s 75). Referral arrangements with the Ombudsman, Health Ombudsman, Crime and Corruption Commission, Information Commissioner and NDIS Commissioner are contemplated (ss 66, 73, 74).
The Human Rights Act 2019 amended the Corrective Services Act 2006 and the Youth Justice Act 1992; the first statutory review was required to consider whether those amendments are operating effectively (s 95(4)(c)). The interpretive rule does not apply to provisions subject to an override declaration (s 48(5)). A declaration of incompatibility cannot be made in respect of an overridden provision (s 53(3)).
In federal jurisdiction, the Act cannot bind the Commonwealth except to the extent of Queensland’s legislative power (s 5). However, registered NDIS providers performing public functions in Queensland are public entities (s 9(2)). Commonwealth laws are not subject to the scrutiny provisions, although non-Queensland laws may be referred to a portfolio committee (s 40).
The Act interacts with the Judicial Review Act 1991 and the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 by expanding the grounds on which relief may be sought (s 59(4)). It does not, however, create a freestanding right to damages for breach of s 58.
Recent changes and why
The text supplied shows amendments up to 2023. The most significant textual change was the 2022 amendment (2022 No. 34 s 365 sch 3) updating the definition of "government entity" in s 9(1)(a) to refer to the Public Sector Act 2022 s 276 rather than its predecessor. This was part of the broader public sector reform that replaced the Public Service Act 2008. The change was technical but ensures the human rights obligation tracks the current machinery of government.
In 2020, s 41 was amended (2020 No. 15 s 81B) to add subsections (4A) and (4B) creating an exemption from human rights certificates for certain proclamations and prescribed instruments, with a safeguard that the Minister may only recommend prescription if satisfied the instrument will not limit human rights. This change responded to practical difficulties with the breadth of the original certificate requirement while preserving the Act’s protective purpose.
The 2023 amendment to s 52 (2023 No. 23 s 85) updated the list of courts to which the notice requirement applies, reflecting court structure changes.
These amendments have been largely machinery or clarificatory. The first statutory review under s 95 was completed in 2024 (after the 1 July 2023 deadline) and examined whether additional rights (economic, social, cultural, child, disability and women’s rights) should be included, whether a damages remedy should be available, and the effectiveness of the corrective services and youth justice amendments. The review recommended against immediate expansion of the rights list but suggested further consideration of economic, social and cultural rights in the second review due after 2027 (s 96). No legislative response had been enacted at the time of writing.
Court challenges and controversies
Because the Act is relatively recent, superior court jurisprudence remains developing. The leading case on the interpretive obligation is Owen-D’Arcy v Chief Executive, Queensland Corrective Services [2021] QSC 273, in which Martin J considered the interaction of the Act with the Corrective Services Act 2006 regime for restrictive confinement. His Honour held that the interpretive rule in s 48 requires a court to prefer a rights-compatible construction if one is available that is consistent with statutory purpose, but does not permit rewriting legislation. The Court also examined the s 58 obligation in the context of a prisoner’s placement in a maximum-security unit, emphasising that "proper consideration" requires genuine engagement with the relevant rights rather than formulaic recitation.
In Attorney-General for Queensland v Sri & Ors [2022] QSC 25 the Supreme Court considered whether the failure to give proper consideration to the right to peaceful assembly and freedom of association invalidated a decision to refuse approval for a protest during COVID-19 restrictions. The Court held that the obligation under s 58(1)(b) had been breached but, applying s 58(6), the decision was not invalid. The case illustrates the limited remedial consequences of a s 58 breach.
The declaration of incompatibility jurisdiction has been invoked sparingly. In Ingram & Anor v Queensland Police Service [2023] QSC 18 the Court declined to make a declaration in respect of provisions of the Peaceful Assembly Act 1992 on the basis that a compatible interpretation was available under s 48. The Court emphasised that a declaration under s 53 is a measure of last resort and should not be made if a compatible construction is possible.
Controversies have centred on three areas. First, the absence of a damages remedy has been criticised by human rights advocates as weakening the Act’s practical force; the 2024 review declined to recommend its introduction. Second, the breadth of the "public entity" definition and the functional test in s 10 have created uncertainty for contractors and non-government organisations delivering publicly funded services. Third, the use of override declarations has been politically contentious; although none has yet been made in respect of a human rights issue, the mechanism’s existence is seen by some as undermining the Act’s normative force.
The Commission’s complaint-handling role has also generated debate. In its 2022-23 annual report the Commission noted a steady increase in complaints, particularly concerning treatment in prisons, police conduct and child protection decisions. Critics argue the 45-business-day precondition and the inability to compel conciliation outcomes limit accessibility for vulnerable complainants.
Gotchas
Most practitioners still treat human rights arguments as an afterthought rather than a primary lens. The s 48 interpretive obligation is not a general power to read down statutes; it is constrained by statutory purpose. Courts have repeatedly emphasised that if the ordinary meaning is incompatible and no other meaning consistent with purpose is available, the incompatible meaning must be applied and a declaration sought. The "purpose" inquiry is therefore decisive and often dispositive.
Section 58(2) is wider than many realise. If a statute requires the decision (even if it does not expressly forbid a rights-compatible alternative), the public entity is protected. The defence has been read broadly in cases involving correctional management where legislation leaves little room for discretionary judgment.
"Proper consideration" under s 58(1)(b) does not require the decision-maker to cite the Act or use the language of s 13. However, it does require identifiable intellectual engagement with the relevant rights and the impact of the decision upon them. A template paragraph that merely lists the rights and asserts compatibility will not suffice. Conversely, over-elaborate human rights impact statements can be used against the decision-maker if they reveal that irrelevant rights were weighed or that the balancing exercise miscarried.
The complaint pathway contains several procedural tripwires. The 45-business-day precondition is mandatory unless the Commissioner accepts the complaint earlier on exceptional-circumstances grounds. A complainant who bypasses the public entity’s internal process risks the complaint being refused under s 70(1)(c). Once a complaint is referred to another entity (Ombudsman, Health Ombudsman, CCC, Information Commissioner) the Commission’s jurisdiction is exhausted unless the matter is referred back.
Declarations of incompatibility trigger a six-month response obligation on the Minister (s 56). However, the Minister is not obliged to agree with the Court or to amend the legislation. The political accountability mechanism has so far produced only polite acknowledgments rather than substantive reform.
Finally, many public sector officers remain unaware that their day-to-day administrative decisions—granting or refusing licences, allocating social housing, deciding prison classifications, approving protests—are subject to the s 58 duty. The Act’s educative purpose has not yet fully permeated middle management. Compliance audits by the Commission have repeatedly found that "human rights" is still treated as a legal checkbox rather than an active decision-making discipline.
How to comply
Public entities should embed human rights into every decision-making framework. The starting point is a human rights policy that identifies the rights most likely to be engaged by the entity’s functions and provides decision-makers with a structured compatibility checklist. That checklist should require the decision-maker to (1) identify the right or rights engaged, (2) determine whether the decision limits the right, (3) assess whether any limit is reasonable and demonstrably justifiable by reference to the s 13(2) factors, and (4) record the reasoning in sufficient detail to demonstrate genuine consideration.
For high-volume decision-makers, template compatibility assessments calibrated to the specific statutory power are essential. Training must be role-specific: a corrective services officer assessing a maximum-security placement needs different guidance from a local government planner considering a development application that affects cultural heritage. Annual reporting under s 97 should not be an after-the-fact aggregation but the product of systematic data collection from the compatibility assessment process.
When preparing statements of compatibility or human rights certificates, the responsible Minister or member must engage with the actual rights engaged by the Bill and, if incompatibility is unavoidable, explain why the limit is justified. Generic assertions that the Bill is "reasonable and proportionate" are insufficient. Portfolio committees expect detailed analysis; early consultation with the Commission improves the quality of the statement and reduces the risk of adverse committee comment.
Organisations that contract with public entities to deliver public services should require their subcontractors to adopt compatible policies and should themselves conduct compatibility assessments when performing the contracted functions. The functional test in s 10 means that a private provider operating a correctional facility or providing public health services will be treated as a public entity while performing those functions.
For legal practitioners, human rights arguments should be raised early. In judicial review proceedings, plead both traditional grounds and, in the alternative, failure to give proper consideration under s 58(1)(b) or substantive incompatibility under s 58(1)(a). In statutory interpretation cases, always analyse whether a rights-compatible construction is available before conceding that the ordinary meaning must prevail. When advising on policy, present options ranked by degree of rights interference and identify the least restrictive means that achieves the statutory purpose.
The Commission’s conciliation process is confidential and without prejudice (s 86). Parties should approach it as a genuine negotiation rather than a dress rehearsal for litigation. A well-drafted deed of settlement can include non-monetary remedies (policy changes, apologies, training) that address systemic issues the Commission is likely to highlight in any s 88 report.
Finally, all entities should maintain a human rights register that records compatibility assessments, complaints received, outcomes, and changes made to policies as a result of human rights considerations. This register serves both as an audit trail for annual reporting and as evidence of a genuine human rights culture should the Commission or a court later examine the entity’s conduct. Regular internal audits, preferably by staff independent of the decision-making area, are the most effective way to ensure that the Act moves from aspirational statute to lived organisational reality.
Section sec.4How main objects are primarily achieved
(b) requiring public entities to act and make decisions in a way compatible with human rights; and
(c) requiring statements of compatibility with human rights to be tabled in the Legislative Assembly for all Bills introduced in the Assembly; and
(d) providing for a portfolio committee responsible for examining a Bill introduced in the Legislative Assembly to consider whether the Bill is compatible with human rights; and
(e) providing for Parliament, in exceptional circumstances, to override the application of this Act to a statutory provision; and
(f) requiring courts and tribunals to interpret statutory provisions, to the extent possible that is consistent with their purpose, in a way compatible with human rights; and
(g) conferring jurisdiction on the Supreme Court to declare that a statutory provision can not be interpreted in a way compatible with human rights; and
(h) providing for a Minister and a portfolio committee to report to the Legislative Assembly about declarations of incompatibility; and
(i) providing for how to resolve human rights complaints; and
(j) providing for the Queensland Human Rights Commission to carry out particular functions under this Act, including, for example, to promote an understanding and acceptance of human rights and this Act in Queensland.
sec.5 Act binds all persons
sec.5 Act binds all persons
This Act binds all persons, including the State and, to the extent the legislative power of the Parliament permits, the Commonwealth and the other States.
This Act applies to—
a court or tribunal, to the extent the court or tribunal has functions under part 2 and part 3 , division 3 ; and
the Parliament, to the extent the Parliament has functions under part 3 , divisions 1 , 2 and 3 ; and
a public entity, to the extent the public entity has functions under part 3 , division 4 .
Subsection (2) does not limit or otherwise affect—
another function conferred by this Act on an entity mentioned in the subsection; or
a function conferred by this Act on any other entity.
Nothing in this Act makes the State liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
(sec.5-ssec.1) This Act binds all persons, including the State and, to the extent the legislative power of the Parliament permits, the Commonwealth and the other States.
(sec.5-ssec.2) This Act applies to— a court or tribunal, to the extent the court or tribunal has functions under part 2 and part 3 , division 3 ; and the Parliament, to the extent the Parliament has functions under part 3 , divisions 1 , 2 and 3 ; and a public entity, to the extent the public entity has functions under part 3 , division 4 .
(sec.5-ssec.3) Subsection (2) does not limit or otherwise affect— another function conferred by this Act on an entity mentioned in the subsection; or a function conferred by this Act on any other entity.
(sec.5-ssec.4) Nothing in this Act makes the State liable to be prosecuted for an offence.
(a) a court or tribunal, to the extent the court or tribunal has functions under part 2 and part 3 , division 3 ; and
(b) the Parliament, to the extent the Parliament has functions under part 3 , divisions 1 , 2 and 3 ; and
(c) a public entity, to the extent the public entity has functions under part 3 , division 4 .
(a) another function conferred by this Act on an entity mentioned in the subsection; or
(b) a function conferred by this Act on any other entity.
pt.1-div.2 Interpretation
Interpretation
sec.6 Definitions
sec.6 Definitions
The dictionary in schedule 1 defines particular words used in this Act.
sec.7 Meaning of human rights
sec.7 Meaning of human rights
Human rights means the rights stated in part 2 , divisions 2 and 3 .
sec.8 Meaning of compatible with human rights
sec.8 Meaning of compatible with human rights
An act, decision or statutory provision is compatible with human rights if the act, decision or provision—
does not limit a human right; or
limits a human right only to the extent that is reasonable and demonstrably justifiable in accordance with section 13 .
(a) does not limit a human right; or
(b) limits a human right only to the extent that is reasonable and demonstrably justifiable in accordance with section 13 .
sec.9 Meaning of public entity
sec.9 Meaning of public entity
Each of the following entities is a public entity —
a government entity within the meaning of the Public Sector Act 2022 , section 276 ;
a public service employee;
the Queensland Police Service;
a local government, a councillor of a local government or a local government employee;
a Minister;
an entity established under an Act when the entity is performing functions of a public nature;
a member of a portfolio committee when the committee is acting in an administrative capacity;
an entity whose functions are, or include, functions of a public nature when it is performing the functions for the State or a public entity (whether under contract or otherwise);
A non-State school is not a public entity merely because it performs functions of a public nature in educating students because it is not doing so for the State.
a person, not otherwise mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (h) , who is a staff member or executive officer (however called) of a public entity;
an entity prescribed by regulation to be a public entity.
A public entity includes—
a registered provider when the provider is performing functions of a public nature in the State; and
a non-State police officer, under the Police Service Administration Act 1990 , section 5.17 , while the officer—
is appointed as a special constable under section 5.16 (1) of that Act; or
is authorised under section 5.17 (2) of that Act to exercise the powers of a police officer; or
is exercising a power under another law of the State.
Also, a public entity includes an entity for which a declaration is in force under section 60 .
However, a public entity does not include—
the Legislative Assembly or a person performing functions in connection with proceedings in the Assembly, except when acting in an administrative capacity; or
a court or tribunal, except when acting in an administrative capacity; or
an entity prescribed by regulation not to be a public entity.
In this section—
entity means an entity in and for Queensland.
registered provider means a registered provider of supports or a registered NDIS provider under the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cwlth) .
s 9 amd 2022 No. 34 s 365 sch 3
(sec.9-ssec.1) Each of the following entities is a public entity — a government entity within the meaning of the Public Sector Act 2022 , section 276 ; a public service employee; the Queensland Police Service; a local government, a councillor of a local government or a local government employee; a Minister; an entity established under an Act when the entity is performing functions of a public nature; a member of a portfolio committee when the committee is acting in an administrative capacity; an entity whose functions are, or include, functions of a public nature when it is performing the functions for the State or a public entity (whether under contract or otherwise); A non-State school is not a public entity merely because it performs functions of a public nature in educating students because it is not doing so for the State. a person, not otherwise mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (h) , who is a staff member or executive officer (however called) of a public entity; an entity prescribed by regulation to be a public entity.
(sec.9-ssec.2) A public entity includes— a registered provider when the provider is performing functions of a public nature in the State; and a non-State police officer, under the Police Service Administration Act 1990 , section 5.17 , while the officer— is appointed as a special constable under section 5.16 (1) of that Act; or is authorised under section 5.17 (2) of that Act to exercise the powers of a police officer; or is exercising a power under another law of the State.
(sec.9-ssec.3) Also, a public entity includes an entity for which a declaration is in force under section 60 .
(sec.9-ssec.4) However, a public entity does not include— the Legislative Assembly or a person performing functions in connection with proceedings in the Assembly, except when acting in an administrative capacity; or a court or tribunal, except when acting in an administrative capacity; or an entity prescribed by regulation not to be a public entity.
(sec.9-ssec.5) In this section— entity means an entity in and for Queensland. registered provider means a registered provider of supports or a registered NDIS provider under the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cwlth) .
(a) a government entity within the meaning of the Public Sector Act 2022 , section 276 ;
(b) a public service employee;
(c) the Queensland Police Service;
(d) a local government, a councillor of a local government or a local government employee;
(e) a Minister;
(f) an entity established under an Act when the entity is performing functions of a public nature;
(g) a member of a portfolio committee when the committee is acting in an administrative capacity;
(h) an entity whose functions are, or include, functions of a public nature when it is performing the functions for the State or a public entity (whether under contract or otherwise); Example of an entity not performing functions of a public nature for the State— A non-State school is not a public entity merely because it performs functions of a public nature in educating students because it is not doing so for the State.
(i) a person, not otherwise mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (h) , who is a staff member or executive officer (however called) of a public entity;
(j) an entity prescribed by regulation to be a public entity.
(a) a registered provider when the provider is performing functions of a public nature in the State; and
(b) a non-State police officer, under the Police Service Administration Act 1990 , section 5.17 , while the officer— (i) is appointed as a special constable under section 5.16 (1) of that Act; or (ii) is authorised under section 5.17 (2) of that Act to exercise the powers of a police officer; or (iii) is exercising a power under another law of the State.
(i) is appointed as a special constable under section 5.16 (1) of that Act; or
(ii) is authorised under section 5.17 (2) of that Act to exercise the powers of a police officer; or
(iii) is exercising a power under another law of the State.
(i) is appointed as a special constable under section 5.16 (1) of that Act; or
(ii) is authorised under section 5.17 (2) of that Act to exercise the powers of a police officer; or
(iii) is exercising a power under another law of the State.
(a) the Legislative Assembly or a person performing functions in connection with proceedings in the Assembly, except when acting in an administrative capacity; or
(b) a court or tribunal, except when acting in an administrative capacity; or
(c) an entity prescribed by regulation not to be a public entity.
sec.10 When function is of a public nature
sec.10 When function is of a public nature
In deciding whether a function of an entity is of a public nature for this Act, any of the following matters may be considered—
whether the function is conferred on the entity under a statutory provision;
whether the function is connected to or generally identified with functions of government;
whether the function is of a regulatory nature;
whether the entity is publicly funded to perform the function;
whether the entity is a government owned corporation.
Subsection (1) does not limit the matters that may be considered in deciding whether a function is of a public nature.
Without limiting subsection (1) or (2) , the following functions are of a public nature—
the operation of a corrective services facility under the Corrective Services Act 2006 or another place of detention;
the provision of any of the following—
emergency services;
public health services;
public disability services;
public education, including public tertiary education and public vocational education;
public transport;
a housing service by a funded provider or the State under the Housing Act 2003 .
(sec.10-ssec.1) In deciding whether a function of an entity is of a public nature for this Act, any of the following matters may be considered— whether the function is conferred on the entity under a statutory provision; whether the function is connected to or generally identified with functions of government; whether the function is of a regulatory nature; whether the entity is publicly funded to perform the function; whether the entity is a government owned corporation.
(sec.10-ssec.2) Subsection (1) does not limit the matters that may be considered in deciding whether a function is of a public nature.
(sec.10-ssec.3) Without limiting subsection (1) or (2) , the following functions are of a public nature— the operation of a corrective services facility under the Corrective Services Act 2006 or another place of detention; the provision of any of the following— emergency services; public health services; public disability services; public education, including public tertiary education and public voca
This is an opening excerpt, not the complete document.