The law creates a statutory scheme letting Victorian courts and VCAT identify and restrain “vexatious” litigating behaviour—placing tiered restraint orders, requiring leave and disclosure before further filings, and targeting third parties who act in concert.
It affects any party or potential party in Victorian proceedings, court administrators and the Attorney‑General, and matters because it balances deterring abusive, repetitive filings with preserving routes for meritorious claims and inter‑court oversight.
The Vexatious Proceedings Act 2014 establishes a statutory framework for preventing, containing and managing vexatious litigation and vexatious interlocutory applications in Victorian courts and tribunals. The Act creates a menu of court-made orders with different scopes and triggers: limited litigation restraint orders (Part 2, ss 10-15), extended litigation restraint orders (Part 3, ss 16-27), general litigation restraint orders (Part 4, ss 28-33), acting in concert orders (Part 5, ss 34-36), appeal restriction orders (Part 6, ss 37-42) and variation-or-revocation application prevention orders (Part 9, ss 74-77). Each order type carries a procedural effect: stays of the affected proceeding on making the order and a statutory rule that any proceeding or interlocutory application begun in contravention of the order is of no effect (see ss 13, 25, 32 and 40).
The Act sets who may apply for each order. The Attorney-General has a specific role: the Attorney-General may apply for extended or limited orders (ss 10(1)(a), 16(1)(a)) and is the only person who may apply for a general litigation restraint order in the Supreme Court (s 28). Non‑Attorney-General applicants who are not the immediate targets (for example, a third party with a sufficient interest) generally need leave of the court or tribunal in which the proceeding is being heard (ss 10(2), 16(2)). Courts and VCAT have express power to make orders on their own motion (ss 11(4), 17(4), 29(4)), which institutionalises proactive case management.
The Act prescribes the tests for granting leave to proceed where an order is in force. A person subject to a limited order must obtain leave to make or continue an interlocutory application and the test requires the court or VCAT to be satisfied the application is not vexatious and there are reasonable grounds (ss 50-51). For extended and general orders, similar leave regimes apply: leave to commence or continue a proceeding may be granted if the proceeding is not vexatious and there are reasonable grounds (ss 52-55). A person applying for leave must make specified disclosures (s 56) and the court may impose conditions on leave (s 64).
Current sections
Direct links to the current provisions in Vexatious Proceedings Act 2014.
109
Part 1
Preliminary
Part 1—Preliminary
1
Purpose
1 Purpose
The main purpose of this Act is to reform and consolidate the law relating to vexatious proceedings in courts and tribunals in a way that—
(a) balances individual rights of access to the courts with the public interest in an efficient and effective justice system; and
(b) promotes uniformity with other jurisdictions in the management and prevention of vexatious behaviour.
2
Commencement
2 Commencement
(1) Subject to subsection (2), this Act comes into operation on a day or days to be proclaimed.
(2) If a provision of this Act does not come into operation before 31 October 2014, it comes into operation on that day.
3
Definitions
3 Definitions
In this Act—
acting in concert has the meaning given by section 4;
acting in concert order means an order made—
(a) by the Supreme Court, the County Court, the Magistrates' Court or VCAT under section 35; or
(b) in relation to intervention order legislation, by the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court under section 36;
appeal restriction order means an order made—
(a) by the Supreme Court under section 37; or
(b) by the County Court, the Magistrates' Court or VCAT under section 38; or
(c) in relation to intervention order legislation, by the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court under section 39;
application for leave to proceed means—
(a) an application under section 50 by a person subject to a limited litigation restraint order for leave to make or continue an interlocutory application in a proceeding; or
(b) an application under section 52 by a person subject to an extended litigation restraint order for leave to commence or continue a proceeding; or
(c) an application under section 54 by a person subject to a general litigation restraint order for leave to commence or continue a proceeding;
Australian court or tribunal means—
(a) a Victorian court or tribunal; or
(b) a court or tribunal of the Commonwealth or of another State or a Territory;
child means a person who is under the age of 18 years;
Court means the following courts—
(a) the Supreme Court;
(b) the County Court;
(c) the Magistrates' Court;
(d) in relation to an order under this Act that relates to intervention order legislation, the Children's Court;
extended litigation restraint order means an order made—
(a) by the Supreme Court, the County Court, the Magistrates' Court or VCAT under section 17; or
(b) in relation to intervention order legislation, by the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court under section 19;
general litigation restraint order means an order made under section 29;
interlocutory application has the meaning given by section 5;
intervention order legislation means—
(a) the Crimes (Family Violence) Act 1987 as in force immediately before its repeal; and
(b) the Family Violence Protection Act 2008; and
(c) the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010; and
(d) the Stalking Intervention Orders Act 2008 as in force immediately before its repeal;
S. 3 def. of legal practitioner amended by No. 38/2017 s. 95(1).
legal practitioner means an Australian legal practitioner;
limited litigation restraint order means an order made under section 11;
litigation restraint order means any of the following orders—
(a) an extended litigation restraint order;
(b) a general litigation restraint order;
(c) a limited litigation restraint order;
parent, of a child, includes—
(a) a person who has responsibility for the long-term welfare of the child and has, in relation to the child, all the parental powers, rights and duties that are vested by law or custom in the guardian of a child; and
(b) a person with whom the child normally or regularly resides;
proceeding means any matter in an Australian court or tribunal, whether civil or criminal, including—
(a) any cause, matter, action, suit, proceeding, trial, complaint or inquiry of any kind within the jurisdiction of an Australian court or tribunal;
(b) any proceeding (including any interlocutory application) taken in connection with or incidental to a proceeding before an Australian court or tribunal;
(c) any appeal, review or other challenge, including an application for judicial review or an application for leave to appeal.
variation or revocation application prevention order means an order made—
(a) by the Supreme Court, the County Court, the Magistrates' Court or VCAT under section 74(1); or
(b) in relation to intervention order legislation, by the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court under section 74(2);
vexatious application includes the following—
(a) an interlocutory application that is an abuse of the process of a court or tribunal;
(b) an interlocutory application made to harass or annoy, to cause delay or detriment, or for another wrongful purpose;
(c) an interlocutory application made or pursued without reasonable ground;
(d) an interlocutory application pursued in a way so as to harass or annoy, cause delay or detriment, or achieve another wrongful purpose;
vexatious proceeding includes the following—
(a) a proceeding that is an abuse of the process of a court or tribunal;
(b) a proceeding commenced to harass or annoy, to cause delay or detriment, or for another wrongful purpose;
(c) a proceeding commenced or pursued without reasonable grounds;
(d) a proceeding conducted in a way so as to harass or annoy, cause delay or detriment, or achieve another wrongful purpose;
vexatious proceeding order means any of the following orders made by an Australian court or tribunal—
(a) an order that a proceeding be stayed or dismissed for being vexatious;
(b) an order that a person commencing or conducting a proceeding is a vexatious litigant;
(c) any other order that requires the person subject to the order to seek leave of an Australian court or tribunal before commencing or continuing a proceeding;
Victorian court or tribunal means any of the following—
(a) the Supreme Court;
(b) the County Court;
(c) the Magistrates' Court;
(d) the Children's Court;
(e) VCAT;
(f) VOCAT;
VOCAT means the Victims of Crime Assistance Tribunal established by the Victims of Crime Assistance Act 1996.
4
Meaning of *acting in concert*
4 Meaning of *acting in concert*
(1) Subject to subsection (2), in this Act, a person is acting in concert with another person if the first mentioned person is—
(a) acting on behalf of the other person; or
(b) acting for the predominant benefit of the other person; or
(c) acting on the instructions of the other person; or
(d) acting in collusion with the other person.
(2) A person who makes an interlocutory application or commences and conducts a proceeding on behalf of a person is not acting in concert with that person if the first mentioned person is—
(a) a legal practitioner acting for the person; or
(b) a litigation guardian of the person; or
(c) a professional advocate within the meaning of section 62(8) of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998; or
(d) any other person authorised or required by law to act on behalf of the person.
Persons who may be authorised or required by law to act on behalf of a person include insurers conducting proceedings under a right of subrogation, administrators, guardians, liquidators, receivers and any other person who has a legal right or obligation to represent the person.
5
Meaning of *interlocutory application*
5 Meaning of *interlocutory application*
(1) In this Act, an interlocutory application means any process by which an interlocutory proceeding is commenced in an Australian court or tribunal, including a subpoena.
(2) Despite subsection (1), the following are not interlocutory applications for the purposes of this Act—
(a) an application under the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 in respect of which a court makes—
(i) an interim order under section 53 or 101 of that Act; or
(ii) an interim extension order under section 107 of that Act; or
(b) an application under the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010 in respect of which a court makes—
(i) an interim order under section 35 or 81 of that Act; or
(ii) an interim extension order under section 84 of that Act.
6
Application of Act
6 Application of Act
(1) This Act applies to all civil proceedings and all criminal proceedings in a Victorian court or tribunal.
(2) The powers conferred on a Victorian court or tribunal by this Act are additional to the powers of a Victorian court or tribunal to control its own proceedings.
7
Act prevails to extent of inconsistency
7 Act prevails to extent of inconsistency
Subject to section 8, to the extent of any inconsistency, this Act prevails over—
(a) any statutory jurisdiction of a Victorian court or tribunal; or
(b) any powers of a Victorian court or tribunal arising or derived from the common law; or
(c) any powers of a Victorian court or tribunal arising or derived under any other Act (including any Commonwealth Act), rule of court, practice note or practice direction.
8
Act does not limit certain other jurisdictions
8 Act does not limit certain other jurisdictions
Nothing in this Act limits—
(a) in the case of the Supreme Court, the Court's inherent jurisdiction or implied jurisdiction; or
(b) in the case of a Court other than the Supreme Court, the Court's implied jurisdiction.
S. 9 amended by No. 38/2017 s. 95(2).
9
Constitution of VCAT
9 Constitution of VCAT
When exercising a power under this Act, VCAT must be constituted by a member who is an Australian lawyer.
Part 2
Limited litigation restraint orders
Part 2—Limited litigation restraint orders
10
Applying for limited litigation restraint order
10 Applying for limited litigation restraint order
(1) Subject to subsection (2), any of the following persons may apply to a Court or VCAT for a limited litigation restraint order against a person who is a party to a proceeding in that Court or in VCAT (as the case requires)—
(b) if the person has made a vexatious application against another person, that other person;
(c) a person who has a sufficient interest in the matter.
A person who is a party to a proceeding and who is not the person against whom a vexatious application has been made may be a person who has a sufficient interest in the matter.
(2) A person referred to in subsection (1)(b) or (c) must not apply for a limited litigation restraint order against a person who is a party to a proceeding—
(a) without leave of the Court in which the proceeding is being heard; or
(b) if the proceeding is being heard in VCAT, without leave of VCAT.
(3) A Court or VCAT may grant leave to apply for a limited litigation restraint order if the Court or VCAT is satisfied that—
11
Court or VCAT may make limited litigation restraint order
11 Court or VCAT may make limited litigation restraint order
(1) A Court or VCAT may make a limited litigation restraint order against a person who is a party to a proceeding if the Court or VCAT is satisfied that—
(a) the person has made 2 or more interlocutory applications in the proceeding; and
(b) the interlocutory applications are vexatious applications.
(2) When making an order under subsection (1), a Court or VCAT may in its discretion take into account any matter it considers relevant, including but not limited to the following—
(a) any interlocutory application made by the person, or an entity controlled by the person, in any Australian court or tribunal;
(b) the existence of any order made by an Australian court or tribunal against the person or an entity controlled by the person, including—
(iii) a vexatious proceeding order; or
(iv) an order striking out a vexatious application;
(3) A Court or VCAT may take into account a matter referred to in subsection (2) that relates to an interlocutory application made or a proceeding commenced or conducted before, on or after the commencement of this section.
(4) A Court or VCAT may make a limited litigation restraint order—
(b) on an application under section 10.
12
Content of limited litigation restraint order
12 Content of limited litigation restraint order
(1) A limited litigation restraint order may direct that the person must not, without leave of the Court or VCAT (as the case requires), do either or both of the following—
(a) make an interlocutory application or specified type of interlocutory application in the proceeding;
(b) continue an interlocutory application or specified type of interlocutory application in the proceeding.
(2) A limited litigation restraint order may include any other direction or order in relation to the proceeding that the Court or VCAT considers appropriate.
(3) Without limiting subsection (2), the Court or VCAT may direct that the person who is subject to the limited litigation restraint order may make or continue a specified type of interlocutory application in the proceeding.
13
Effect of limited litigation restraint order
13 Effect of limited litigation restraint order
On the making of a limited litigation restraint order, subject to the terms of the order—
(a) an interlocutory application in the proceeding to which the order relates is stayed; and
(b) an interlocutory application that is made in contravention of the order is of no effect.
14
Limited litigation restraint order does not affect certain applications or proceedings
14 Limited litigation restraint order does not affect certain applications or proceedings
A limited litigation restraint order made against a person in respect of a proceeding does not affect the person's right—
(a) to make or continue an interlocutory application in another proceeding in a Victorian court or tribunal; or
(b) to commence or continue another proceeding in a Victorian court or tribunal.
15
Duration of limited litigation restraint order
15 Duration of limited litigation restraint order
Unless a Court or VCAT otherwise orders, a limited litigation restraint order remains in force for the duration of the proceeding to which the order relates.
Part 3
Extended litigation restraint orders
Part 3—Extended litigation restraint orders
16
Application for extended litigation restraint order
16 Application for extended litigation restraint order
(1) Subject to subsection (2), any of the following persons may apply to a Court or VCAT for an extended litigation restraint order against a person—
(b) if the person has commenced or conducted a vexatious proceeding against another person, that other person;
(c) a person with a sufficient interest in the matter.
(2) A person referred to in subsection (1)(b) or (c) must not apply for an extended litigation restraint order—
(a) without leave of the Court of the jurisdiction in which the order is sought; or
(b) if the order is sought in respect of proceedings in VCAT, without leave of VCAT.
(3) A Court or VCAT may grant leave to apply for an extended litigation restraint order if the Court or VCAT is satisfied that—
17
Court or VCAT may make extended litigation restraint order
17 Court or VCAT may make extended litigation restraint order
(1) A Court or VCAT may make an extended litigation restraint order against a person if the Court or VCAT is satisfied that the person has frequently commenced or conducted vexatious proceedings—
(a) against a person or other entity; or
(b) in relation to a matter.
The Magistrates' Court may also make an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation under section 19.
(2) In determining whether it is satisfied of the matters specified in subsection (1), a Court or VCAT may take into account any matter it considers relevant, including but not limited to any of the following—
(a) a proceeding commenced or conducted by the person, or an entity controlled by the person, in any Australian court or tribunal;
(b) the existence of an order made by an Australian court or tribunal against the person, or an entity controlled by the person, including—
(iii) a vexatious proceeding order;
(3) A Court or VCAT may take into account a matter referred to in subsection (2) that relates to a proceeding commenced or conducted before, on or after the commencement of this section.
(4) A Court or VCAT may make an extended litigation restraint order—
(b) on an application under section 16.
18
Application for extended litigation restraint order—intervention order legislation
18 Application for extended litigation restraint order—intervention order legislation
(1) Subject to subsection (2), any of the following persons may apply to the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court for an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation against a person—
(b) if the person has commenced or conducted a vexatious proceeding under intervention order legislation against another person, that other person;
(c) a person with a sufficient interest in the matter.
For the purposes of an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation, a person with a sufficient interest in the matter may include a police officer or a guardian or family member who seeks to apply for an intervention order under intervention order legislation on behalf of a person.
(2) A person referred to in subsection (1)(b) or (c) must not apply for an extended litigation restraint order without leave of the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court (as the case requires).
(3) The Children's Court or the Magistrates' Court may grant leave to apply for an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation if the Court is satisfied that—
19
Magistrates' Court or Children's Court may make extended litigation restraint order—intervention order legislation
19 Magistrates' Court or Children's Court may make extended litigation restraint order—intervention order legislation
(1) The Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court may make an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation against a person if the court is satisfied that the person has frequently commenced or conducted vexatious proceedings under intervention order legislation—
(a) against a person; or
(b) in relation to a matter.
(2) In determining whether it is satisfied of the matters specified in subsection (1), the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court may take into account any matter it considers relevant.
(3) The Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court may make an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation—
(b) on an application under section 18.
See section 154 of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 or section 111 of the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010 in relation to costs for a proceeding for an order made under this section.
20
Content of extended litigation restraint order made by Supreme Court
20 Content of extended litigation restraint order made by Supreme Court
(1) An extended litigation restraint order made by the Supreme Court against a person may direct that the person must not do either or both of the following for the period specified by the Supreme Court—
(a) continue a proceeding in a Victorian court or tribunal against a person or other entity named in the order, or in respect of a matter described in the order, without leave of—
(ii) the Victorian court or tribunal in which the proceeding is being heard;
(b) commence a proceeding in a Victorian court or tribunal against a person or other entity named in the order, or in respect of a matter described in the order, without leave of—
(ii) the Victorian court or tribunal in which the proceeding is to be commenced.
(2) An extended litigation restraint order made by the Supreme Court may include any other direction or order that the Supreme Court considers appropriate.
(3) Without limiting subsection (2), the Supreme Court may direct that the person who is subject to the order may commence or continue a specified proceeding in a Victorian court or tribunal.
21
Content of extended litigation restraint order made by County Court
21 Content of extended litigation restraint order made by County Court
(1) An extended litigation restraint order made by the County Court against a person may direct that the person must not, without leave of the County Court, do either or both of the following for the period specified by the County Court—
(a) continue a proceeding in the County Court against a person or other entity named in the order or in respect of a matter described in the order;
(b) commence a proceeding in the County Court against a person or other entity named in the order or in respect of a matter described in the order.
(2) An extended litigation restraint order made by the County Court may include any other direction or order in relation to a proceeding or the commencement of a proceeding in the County Court that the court considers appropriate.
(3) Without limiting subsection (2), the County Court may direct that the person who is subject to the order may commence or continue a specified proceeding in the County Court.
22
Content of extended litigation restraint order made by Magistrates' Court
22 Content of extended litigation restraint order made by Magistrates' Court
(1) An extended litigation restraint order made by the Magistrates' Court against a person under section 17 may direct that the person must not, without leave of the Magistrates' Court, do either or both of the following for the period specified by the Magistrates' Court—
(a) continue a proceeding in the Magistrates' Court against a person or other entity named in the order or in respect of a matter described in the order;
(b) commence a proceeding in the Magistrates' Court against a person or other entity named in the order or in respect of a matter described in the order.
(2) An extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made by the Magistrates' Court against a person under section 19 may direct that the person must not, without leave of the Magistrates' Court, do either or both of the following for the period specified by the Magistrates' Court—
(a) continue a proceeding in the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court under intervention order legislation—
(i) against a person protected by the extended litigation restraint order and, if the person is a parent of a child, his or her child; or
(ii) in respect of a matter described in the order;
(b) commence a proceeding in the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court under intervention order legislation—
(i) against a person protected by the extended litigation restraint order and, if the person is a parent of a child, his or her child; or
(ii) in respect of a matter described in the order.
(3) An extended litigation restraint order made by the Magistrates' Court may include any other direction or order that the Magistrates' Court considers appropriate in relation to a proceeding or the commencement of a proceeding—
(a) in the case of an extended litigation restraint order made under section 17, in the Magistrates' Court; or
(b) in the case of an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made under section 19, in the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court.
(4) Without limiting subsection (3), the Magistrates' Court may direct that the person who is subject to the order may commence or continue a specified proceeding—
(a) in the case of an extended litigation restraint order made under section 17, in the Magistrates' Court; or
(b) in the case of an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made under section 19, in the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court.
23
Content of extended litigation restraint order made by Children's Court
23 Content of extended litigation restraint order made by Children's Court
(1) An extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made by the Children's Court against a person may direct that the person must not, without leave of the Children's Court, do either or both of the following for the period specified by the Children's Court—
(a) continue a proceeding in the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court under intervention order legislation—
(i) against a person protected by the extended litigation restraint order and, if the person is a parent of a child, his or her child; or
(ii) in respect of a matter described in the order;
(b) commence a proceeding in the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court under intervention order legislation—
(i) against a person protected by the extended litigation restraint order and, if the person is a parent of a child, his or her child; or
(ii) in respect of a matter described in the order.
(2) An extended litigation restraint order referred to in subsection (1) may include any other direction or order in relation to a proceeding or the commencement of a proceeding that relates to intervention order legislation that the Children's Court considers appropriate.
(3) Without limiting subsection (2), the Children's Court may direct that the person who is subject to the extended litigation restraint order may commence or continue a specified proceeding in the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court under intervention order legislation.
24
Content of extended litigation restraint order made by VCAT
24 Content of extended litigation restraint order made by VCAT
(1) An extended litigation restraint order made by VCAT against a person may direct that the person must not, without leave of VCAT, do either or both of the following for the period specified by VCAT—
(a) continue a proceeding in VCAT against a person or other entity named in the order or in respect of a matter described in the order;
(b) commence a proceeding in VCAT against a person or other entity named in the order or in respect of a matter described in the order.
(2) An extended litigation restraint order made by VCAT may include any other direction or order in relation to a proceeding or the commencement of a proceeding in VCAT that VCAT considers appropriate.
(3) Without limiting subsection (2), VCAT may direct that the person who is subject to the order may commence or continue a specified proceeding in VCAT.
25
Effect of extended litigation restraint order on proceeding
25 Effect of extended litigation restraint order on proceeding
On the making of an extended litigation restraint order, subject to the terms of the order—
(a) a proceeding to which the order relates is stayed; and
(b) a proceeding that is commenced in contravention of the order is of no effect.
26
Extended litigation restraint order does not affect certain proceedings
26 Extended litigation restraint order does not affect certain proceedings
(1) An extended litigation restraint order made by the Supreme Court does not affect a person's right to commence or continue a proceeding in the relevant jurisdiction against a person or other entity, or in respect of a matter, that is not specified in the order.
(2) An extended litigation restraint order made by the County Court or VCAT does not affect a person's right to commence or continue a proceeding in another Victorian court or tribunal that is not the jurisdiction that made the extended litigation restraint order.
(3) Subject to subsection (4), an extended litigation restraint order made by the Magistrates' Court does not affect a person's right to commence or continue a proceeding in any jurisdiction other than the Magistrates' Court.
(4) An extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made by the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court against a person does not affect the person's right—
(a) to commence or continue a proceeding in the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court against a person, the child of a person or in respect of a matter not specified in the order; or
(b) to commence or continue a proceeding in the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court under legislation other than intervention order legislation; or
(c) to commence or continue a proceeding in any jurisdiction other than the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court.
27
Duration of extended litigation restraint order
27 Duration of extended litigation restraint order
(1) An extended litigation restraint order, including an order that relates to intervention order legislation, remains in force for the period specified in the order.
(2) A Court or VCAT may specify that an order referred to in subsection (1) remains in force indefinitely.
(3) A Court or VCAT may extend the duration of an extended litigation restraint order referred to in subsection (1) if the Court or VCAT considers it is in the interests of justice to do so.
Part 4
General litigation restraint orders
Part 4—General litigation restraint orders
28
Application for general litigation restraint order
28 Application for general litigation restraint order
The Attorney-General may apply to the Supreme Court for a general litigation restraint order against a person.
29
Supreme Court may make general litigation restraint order
29 Supreme Court may make general litigation restraint order
(1) The Supreme Court constituted by a Judge of the Court may make a general litigation restraint order against a person if the Court is satisfied that the person has persistently and without reasonable grounds commenced or conducted vexatious proceedings.
(2) In determining whether it is satisfied of the matters specified in subsection (1), the Supreme Court may take into account any matter it considers relevant, including but not limited to any of the following—
(a) any proceeding commenced or conducted by the person, or an entity controlled by the person, in any Australian court or tribunal;
(b) the existence of any order made by an Australian court or tribunal against the person, or an entity controlled by the person, including—
(iii) a vexatious proceeding order;
(3) The Supreme Court may take into account a matter referred to in subsection (2) that relates to a proceeding commenced or conducted before, on or after the commencement of this section.
(4) The Supreme Court may make a general litigation restraint order—
(b) on an application under section 28.
30
General litigation restraint order
30 General litigation restraint order
(1) A general litigation restraint order made against a person may direct that the person must not do either or both of the following for the period specified by the Supreme Court—
(a) continue any proceeding in a Victorian court or tribunal without leave of—
(ii) the Victorian court or tribunal in which the proceeding is being heard;
(b) commence any proceeding in a Victorian court or tribunal without leave of—
(ii) the Victorian court or tribunal in which the proceeding is to be commenced.
(2) A general litigation restraint order may include any other direction or order that the Supreme Court considers appropriate.
(3) Without limiting subsection (2), the Supreme Court may direct that the person who is subject to the general litigation restraint order may commence or continue a specified proceeding in a Victorian court or tribunal.
31
Supreme Court may make extended litigation restraint order instead of general litigation restraint order
31 Supreme Court may make extended litigation restraint order instead of general litigation restraint order
(1) On an application under section 28, the Supreme Court may make an extended litigation restraint order against a person the subject of the application if the Court—
(a) is not satisfied that the person has persistently and without reasonable grounds commenced or conducted vexatious proceedings; and
(b) is satisfied that the person has frequently commenced or conducted vexatious proceedings against a person or other entity or in relation to a matter.
(2) An extended litigation restraint order made under this section may be made on the same terms as an extended litigation restraint order made by the Supreme Court under Part 3.
32
Effect of general litigation restraint order on proceeding
32 Effect of general litigation restraint order on proceeding
On the making of a general litigation restraint order, subject to the terms of the order—
(a) a proceeding to which the order relates is stayed; and
(b) a proceeding that is commenced in contravention of the order is of no effect.
33
Duration of general litigation restraint order
33 Duration of general litigation restraint order
(1) A general litigation restraint order remains in force for the period specified in the order.
(2) The Supreme Court may specify that an order remains in force indefinitely.
(3) The Supreme Court may extend the duration of a general litigation restraint order referred to in subsection (1) if it considers it is in the interests of justice to do so.
Part 5
Acting in concert orders
Part 5—Acting in concert orders
34
Application for acting in concert order
34 Application for acting in concert order
Any of the following persons may apply to a Court or VCAT for an order against a person who is acting in concert with a person who is subject to a litigation restraint order—
(a) a person who applied for the litigation restraint order to which that other person is subject;
(b) a person named in an interlocutory application or a proceeding that, if made or commenced by the person who is subject to the litigation restraint order, would contravene the terms of that litigation restraint order.
35
Court or VCAT may make acting in concert order
35 Court or VCAT may make acting in concert order
(1) A Court or VCAT may make an order against a person who is acting in concert with a person who is subject to a litigation restraint order if satisfied that—
(a) the first mentioned person has made an interlocutory application or commenced a proceeding; and
(b) the interlocutory application or proceeding, if made or commenced by the person who is subject to the litigation restraint order, would contravene the terms of that litigation restraint order.
(2) A Court or VCAT may make an order against a person acting in concert—
(b) on an application under section 34.
(3) An order made by a Court or VCAT against a person acting in concert may specify all or any of the following—
(a) that the person is subject to a limited litigation restraint order—
(ii) on any of the terms that the Court or VCAT may order under Part 2;
(b) that the person is subject to an extended litigation restraint order—
(ii) on any of the terms that the Court or VCAT may order under Part 3;
(c) that the interlocutory application made by the person in the proceeding is struck out;
(d) that the proceeding commenced by the person is stayed;
(e) that the person is liable for costs in the proceeding.
(4) Subject to subsection (5), an acting in concert order may direct any other thing that the Court or VCAT considers appropriate in the circumstances.
(5) An acting in concert order made against a person must not direct that the person is subject to a general litigation restraint order.
The Supreme Court may order that the person is subject to a general litigation restraint order under Part 4.
36
Magistrates' Court or Children's Court may make acting in concert order—intervention order legislation
36 Magistrates' Court or Children's Court may make acting in concert order—intervention order legislation
(1) The Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court may make an order against a person who is acting in concert with a person who is subject to an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation if satisfied that—
(a) the first mentioned person has commenced a proceeding under intervention order legislation; and
(b) the proceeding, if commenced by the person who is subject to the extended litigation restraint order, would contravene the terms of that extended litigation restraint order.
(2) The Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court may make an order against a person acting in concert—
(b) on an application under section 34.
(3) An order made by the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court against a person acting in concert may specify all or any of the following—
(a) that the person is subject to an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation—
(ii) on any of the terms that the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court may order under section 22(2) or 23(1) (as the case requires);
(b) that the proceeding commenced by the person is stayed.
(4) An acting in concert order that relates to intervention order legislation may direct any other thing that the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court considers appropriate in the circumstances.
See section 154 of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 or section 111 of the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010 in relation to costs for a proceeding for an order made under this section.
Part 6
Appeal restriction orders
Part 6—Appeal restriction orders
37
Supreme Court may make an appeal restriction order
37 Supreme Court may make an appeal restriction order
(1) The Supreme Court may make an appeal restriction order against a person if the Supreme Court is satisfied that—
(2) An appeal restriction order made against a person by the Supreme Court may direct that, for the period specified by the Supreme Court, the person has no right to appeal a decision by a Victorian court or tribunal—
(a) to refuse leave to make or continue an interlocutory application in a proceeding; or
(b) to refuse leave to commence or continue a proceeding.
(b) despite the terms of the litigation restraint order.
38
Court or VCAT may make appeal restriction order
38 Court or VCAT may make appeal restriction order
(1) The County Court, the Magistrates' Court or VCAT may make an appeal restriction order against a person if satisfied that—
(2) An appeal restriction order made under subsection (1) may direct that, for the period specified in the order, the person has no right to appeal a decision by the relevant court or by VCAT—
(a) to refuse leave to make or continue an interlocutory application in a proceeding in the relevant court or in VCAT (as the case requires); or
(b) to refuse leave to commence or continue a proceeding in the relevant court or in VCAT (as the case requires).
(b) despite the terms of the litigation restraint order.
39
Magistrates' Court or Children's Court may make appeal restriction order—intervention order legislation
39 Magistrates' Court or Children's Court may make appeal restriction order—intervention order legislation
(1) The Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court may make an appeal restriction order against a person who is subject to an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation if satisfied that—
(2) An appeal restriction order made against a person referred to in subsection (1) by the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court may direct that, for the period specified in the order, the person has no right to appeal a decision of the relevant court to refuse leave to commence or continue a proceeding in that court.
(b) despite the terms of the extended litigation restraint order.
40
Effect of appeal restriction order
40 Effect of appeal restriction order
On the making of an appeal restriction order, subject to the terms of the order—
(a) an application for leave to appeal to which the order relates is stayed; and
(b) an application for leave to appeal made in contravention of the order is of no effect.
41
Appeal restriction order does not affect other applications or proceedings
41 Appeal restriction order does not affect other applications or proceedings
An appeal restriction order made by a Court or VCAT does not affect a person's right—
(a) to make or continue another type of interlocutory application in a Victorian court or tribunal; or
(b) to commence or continue a proceeding in a Victorian court or tribunal (other than the appeal).
The terms of a litigation restraint order may restrict a person's right to make or continue an interlocutory application or commence or continue a proceeding in a Victorian court or tribunal.
42
Duration of appeal restriction order
42 Duration of appeal restriction order
(1) An appeal restriction order remains in force for the period specified in the order.
(2) A Court or VCAT may specify that an order remains in force indefinitely.
(3) A Court or VCAT may extend the duration of an appeal restriction order referred to in subsection (1) if the Court or VCAT considers it is in the interests of justice to do so.
Part 7—General matters relating to orders
Division 1—Applications for orders
43 Attorney-General may request documents from Victorian court or tribunal
(1) For the purposes of deciding whether to make an application for a litigation restraint order against a person, the Attorney-General may request a Victorian court or tribunal to provide a copy of documents held by the Victorian court or tribunal in relation to an interlocutory application made or a proceeding commenced by the person.
(2) A Victorian court or tribunal may provide to the Attorney-General a copy of documents requested under subsection (1).
44
Notice of application for order—intervention order legislation
44 Notice of application for order—intervention order legislation
The principal registrar of the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court (as the case requires) must cause a copy of an application under section 18 for an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation to be given to—
(a) the person who it is proposed will be protected by the order; and
(b) the person who it is proposed will be subject to the order.
Div 2
Making of orders
Division 2—Making of orders
45
Certain persons must be given opportunity to be heard
45 Certain persons must be given opportunity to be heard
(1) Subject to subsection (2), a Court or VCAT must not make a litigation restraint order, an acting in concert order or an appeal restriction order against a person without—
(a) hearing the person; or
(b) giving the person an opportunity to be heard.
(2) The Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court must not make an extended litigation restraint order, an acting in concert order or an appeal restriction order that relates to intervention order legislation without—
(a) hearing—
(i) the person who will be subject to the order; and
(ii) the person who will be protected by the order; or
(b) giving the persons referred to in paragraph (a) an opportunity to be heard.
(3) For the purposes of subsections (1) and (2), the Court or VCAT may order that submissions be made in writing or given at an oral hearing.
46
Statement of reasons for order—intervention order legislation
46 Statement of reasons for order—intervention order legislation
An extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made by the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court must include or be accompanied by a statement of reasons for the decision.
Div 3
Copies of orders
Division 3—Copies of orders
47
Copy of order to be given to Attorney-General
47 Copy of order to be given to Attorney-General
(1) If a Court or VCAT makes a litigation restraint order, an acting in concert order or an appeal restriction order, the Court or VCAT (as the case requires) must ensure a copy of the order is given to the Attorney-General.
(2) Despite section 117(6) of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998, a copy of an order made by VCAT given to the Attorney-General under subsection (1) is not required to include a statement of reasons referred to in that section.
48
Copy of order to be given to other Victorian courts and tribunals
48 Copy of order to be given to other Victorian courts and tribunals
(1) If the Supreme Court makes a litigation restraint order, an acting in concert order or an appeal restriction order, the Prothonotary must cause a copy of the order to be given—
(a) in the case of a general litigation restraint order or an extended litigation restraint order, to each Victorian court or tribunal; or
(b) in any other case, to the County Court, the Magistrates' Court and to VCAT.
(2) If the County Court makes a litigation restraint order, an acting in concert order or an appeal restriction order, the registrar of the County Court must cause a copy of the order to be given to the Supreme Court, the Magistrates' Court and to VCAT.
(3) If the Magistrates' Court makes a litigation restraint order, an acting in concert order or an appeal restriction order, the principal registrar of the Magistrates' Court must cause a copy of the order to be given—
(a) in the case of an order that relates to intervention order legislation, to the Supreme Court, the County Court, the Children's Court and to VCAT; or
(b) in any other case, to the Supreme Court, the County Court and to VCAT.
(4) If the Children's Court makes an extended litigation restraint order, an acting in concert order or an appeal restriction order that relates to intervention order legislation, the principal registrar of the Children's Court must cause a copy of the order to be given to the Supreme Court, the County Court, the Magistrates' Court and to VCAT.
(5) If VCAT makes a litigation restraint order, an acting in concert order or an appeal restriction order, the principal registrar of VCAT must cause a copy of the order to be given to the Supreme Court, the County Court and the Magistrates' Court.
(6) Despite section 117(6) of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998, a copy of an order made by VCAT given to a Court under subsection (5) is not required to include a statement of reasons referred to in that section.
49
Copy of order—intervention order legislation
49 Copy of order—intervention order legislation
The principal registrar of the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court (as the case requires) must cause a copy of an extended litigation restraint order, an acting in concert order or an appeal restriction order that relates to intervention order legislation to be given to—
(a) the person subject to the order; and
(b) the person protected by the order; and
(c) if the applicant is not the person protected by the order, the applicant.
Part 8—Applications for leave to proceed
Division 1—Application for leave to proceed under limited litigation restraint order
50 Application for leave to make or continue interlocutory application
(1) A person who is subject to a limited litigation restraint order may apply to the Court that made the order or to VCAT (as the case requires) for leave to make or continue an interlocutory application in the proceeding to which the order relates.
(2) This section applies despite anything to the contrary in the limited litigation restraint order.
51
Court or VCAT may grant leave to make or continue interlocutory application
51 Court or VCAT may grant leave to make or continue interlocutory application
On an application under section 50, a Court or VCAT may grant a person who is subject to a limited litigation restraint order leave to make or continue an interlocutory application in a proceeding to which the order relates if the Court or VCAT is satisfied that—
(a) the interlocutory application to be made or continued is not a vexatious application; and
(b) there are reasonable grounds for the application.
Division 2—Application for leave to proceed under extended litigation restraint order
52
Application for leave to commence or continue proceeding
52 Application for leave to commence or continue proceeding
(1) Subject to subsection (2), a person who is subject to an extended litigation restraint order may apply to a Victorian court or tribunal for leave to commence or continue a proceeding—
(a) against a person or other entity protected by the order; or
(b) in respect of a matter described in the order.
(2) A person who is subject to an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation may apply to the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court for leave to commence or continue a proceeding—
(a) against a person protected by the order or his or her child; or
(b) in respect of a matter described in the order.
(3) Subject to subsection (4), an application under subsection (1) or (2) must be made to the Victorian court or tribunal that made the extended litigation restraint order.
(4) If the extended litigation restraint order was made by the Supreme Court and the order does not provide otherwise, an application under subsection (1) must be made to the Victorian court or tribunal that would hear the proceeding to which the application for leave relates.
(5) Subsection (1) applies despite anything to the contrary in the extended litigation restraint order.
S. 53 amended by No. 21/2015 s. 3(Sch. 1 item 60).
53
Court or VCAT may grant leave to commence or continue proceeding
53 Court or VCAT may grant leave to commence or continue proceeding
On an application under section 52, a Victorian court or tribunal may grant a person who is subject to an extended litigation restraint order leave to commence or continue a proceeding against a person or other entity protected by the order, a child of a person protected by the order, or in respect of a matter described in the order, if the Victorian court or tribunal is satisfied that—
(a) the proceeding is not a vexatious proceeding; and
(b) there are reasonable grounds for the proceeding.
Division 3—Application for leave to proceed under general litigation restraint order
54
Application for leave to commence or continue proceeding
54 Application for leave to commence or continue proceeding
(1) A person who is subject to a general litigation restraint order may apply to a Victorian court or tribunal for leave to commence or continue a proceeding.
(2) Unless the general litigation restraint order provides otherwise, an application under subsection (1) must be made to the Victorian court or tribunal that would hear the proceeding to which the leave application relates.
(3) Subsection (1) applies despite anything to the contrary in the general litigation restraint order.
55
Victorian court or tribunal may grant leave to commence or continue proceeding
55 Victorian court or tribunal may grant leave to commence or continue proceeding
On an application under section 54, a Victorian court or tribunal may grant a person who is subject to a general litigation restraint order leave to commence or continue a proceeding if the Victorian court or tribunal is satisfied that—
(a) the proceeding is not a vexatious proceeding; and
(b) there are reasonable grounds for the proceeding.
Div 4
General matters relating to applications for leave to proceed
Division 4—General matters relating to applications for leave to proceed
56
Person must disclose certain matters
56 Person must disclose certain matters
(1) A person subject to a litigation restraint order who makes an application for leave to proceed must disclose the following details to the Victorian court or tribunal in which the application is made—
(a) details of each application for leave to proceed made by the person;
(b) details of each application for leave to commence or continue a proceeding made by the person under section 21 of the Supreme Court Act 1986, as in force immediately before its repeal;
(c) details of each interlocutory application made or proceeding commenced or conducted by the person—
(a) that is a vexatious application or a vexatious proceeding; or
(b) which has been stayed or dismissed on the basis of being made, commenced or conducted without merit;
(d) an explanation as to how the application for leave to proceed is materially different to each application referred to in paragraph (a), (b) or (c) (if any);
(e) all other facts material to the application, whether in support of or adverse to the application, that are known to the person.
(2) A disclosure under subsection (1) must be made by affidavit unless the rules of the court or rules of the tribunal otherwise provide or the Victorian court or tribunal otherwise orders.
57
Refusal to accept application for leave to proceed
57 Refusal to accept application for leave to proceed
(1) Subject to subsection (2), the following persons may refuse on behalf of a Victorian court or tribunal to accept for filing or lodgment an application for leave to proceed, if not satisfied that the application is materially different from a previous application made by the applicant—
(a) in the case of the Supreme Court—the Prothonotary; or
(b) in the case of the County Court—the registrar of the County Court; or
(c) in the case of the Magistrates' Court—the principal registrar of the Magistrates' Court; or
(d) in the case of the Children's Court for an application that relates to intervention order legislation—the principal registrar of the Children's Court; or
(e) in the case of VCAT—the principal registrar of VCAT; or
(f) in the case of VOCAT—the principal registrar of VOCAT.
(2) The Victorian court or tribunal may direct the relevant person referred to in subsection (1) to accept an application for leave to proceed.
58
Victorian court or tribunal may dismiss application for leave to proceed
58 Victorian court or tribunal may dismiss application for leave to proceed
A Victorian court or tribunal may dismiss an application for leave to proceed made by a person if the Victorian court or tribunal is not satisfied that the application is materially different to a previous application made by that person.
59
No notice of application to be given without direction or order
59 No notice of application to be given without direction or order
Despite anything to the contrary in any other Act or rules of court, a person who makes an application for leave to proceed must not give notice of the application unless a Victorian court or tribunal—
(a) otherwise directs the applicant under section 60 or 61; or
60
Direction as to giving notice of application
60 Direction as to giving notice of application
(1) This section applies if a Victorian court or tribunal considers that an application for leave to proceed, other than an application for leave to proceed under an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation, should proceed.
(2) The Victorian court or tribunal must direct the applicant for leave to proceed to give notice of the application to the following persons—
(b) the person (if any) who made the application for the litigation restraint order to which the application for leave to proceed relates;
(c) any person named in the interlocutory application or the proceeding to which the application for leave to proceed relates.
(3) A Victorian court or tribunal may make any other order in relation to the notification of persons that it considers appropriate in the circumstances.
(a) include a copy of the application for leave to proceed; and
(b) state that the person given the application is entitled to make submissions in relation to the application.
61
Direction as to giving notice of application—intervention order legislation
61 Direction as to giving notice of application—intervention order legislation
(1) This section applies if the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court considers that an application for leave to proceed under an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation should proceed.
(2) The Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court (as the case requires) must direct the principal registrar of the court to cause notice of the application to be given to the following persons—
(b) the person (if any) who made the application for the extended litigation restraint order to which the application for leave to proceed relates;
(c) any person named in the proceeding to which the application for leave to proceed relates.
(3) The Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court may make any other order in relation to the notification of persons that it considers appropriate in the circumstances.
(a) include a copy of the application for leave to proceed; and
(b) state that the person given notice of the application is entitled to make submissions in relation to the application.
62
Victorian court or tribunal may give persons opportunity to be heard
62 Victorian court or tribunal may give persons opportunity to be heard
(1) A person who has been given notice in accordance with section 60 or 61 may be heard in relation to the application for leave to proceed.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the Victorian court or tribunal may direct that the person make written submissions or oral submissions.
63
Determining application for leave to proceed
63 Determining application for leave to proceed
(1) A Victorian court or tribunal may determine an application for leave to proceed on the basis of written submissions, without the appearance of—
(a) the person who made the application; or
(b) any person given notice of the application in accordance with section 60 or 61.
(2) Despite subsection (1), a Victorian court or tribunal may determine an application for leave to proceed by conducting an oral hearing, if the Victorian court or tribunal considers—
(3) An oral hearing may be held under subsection (2) regardless of whether written submissions have been made to the Victorian court or tribunal and, if made, whether those submissions establish the matters required for the granting of leave or the dismissal of the application.
64
Leave may be subject to conditions
64 Leave may be subject to conditions
If a Victorian court or tribunal grants a person leave to make or continue an interlocutory application, or to commence or continue a proceeding, the leave may be subject to any conditions that the Victorian court or tribunal considers appropriate in the circumstances.
The Victorian court or tribunal may order that the person must deposit a certain amount of funds with the Victorian court or tribunal as security for costs in the proceeding.
Part 9—Variation or revocation of litigation restraint order
Division 1—Court or VCAT may vary or revoke order
65 Application for variation or revocation of litigation restraint order
(1) Subject to subsection (2), a person who is subject to a litigation restraint order may apply to vary or revoke the order—
(a) to the Court that made the order with leave of that Court; or
(b) if the order was made by VCAT, to VCAT with leave of VCAT.
(2) A person who is subject to an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation may apply to vary or revoke the order—
(a) if the order was made by the Magistrates' Court, to the Magistrates' Court with leave of that court; or
(b) if the order was made by the Children's Court, to the Children's Court with leave of that court.
(3) This section applies despite anything to the contrary in the litigation restraint order, including an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation.
66
No notice of application to be given without direction or order
66 No notice of application to be given without direction or order
(1) Despite anything to the contrary in any other Act or rules of court, a person who makes an application for leave to apply to vary or revoke a litigation restraint order must not give notice of the application for leave unless a Court or VCAT makes an order in relation to the notification of persons.
(2) Despite anything to the contrary in any other Act or rules of court, a person who makes an application to vary or revoke a litigation restraint order must not give notice of the application unless a Court or VCAT—
(a) otherwise directs the applicant under section 67 or 68; or
67
Direction as to notice of application
67 Direction as to notice of application
(1) This section applies if a Court or VCAT considers that an application to vary or revoke a litigation restraint order, other than an application to vary or revoke an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation, should proceed.
(2) The Court or VCAT (as the case requires) must direct the applicant for the variation or revocation to give notice of the application to the following persons—
(b) the person (if any) who made the application for the litigation restraint order;
(c) the person (if any) who is protected by the litigation restraint order.
(3) A Court or VCAT may make any other order in relation to the notification of persons that it considers appropriate in the circumstances.
(a) include a copy of the application for variation or revocation; and
(b) state that the person given the application is entitled to make submissions in relation to the application.
68
Direction as to notice of application—intervention order legislation
68 Direction as to notice of application—intervention order legislation
(1) This section applies if the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court considers that an application to vary or revoke an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation should proceed.
(2) The Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court (as the case requires) must direct the principal registrar of the court to cause notice of the application to be given to the following persons—
(b) the person (if any) who made the application for the extended litigation restraint order;
(c) the person protected by the extended litigation restraint order.
(3) The Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court may make any other order in relation to the notification of persons that it considers appropriate in the circumstances.
(a) include a copy of the application for variation or revocation; and
(b) state that the person given notice of the application is entitled to make submissions in relation to the application.
69
Court or VCAT may vary or revoke litigation restraint order
69 Court or VCAT may vary or revoke litigation restraint order
(1) If it considers it is in the interests of justice to do so, a Court or VCAT may by order—
(a) vary a litigation restraint order in any manner the Court or VCAT considers appropriate; or
(b) revoke a litigation restraint order.
(2) A Court or VCAT may make an order under subsection (1)—
(b) on an application under section 65(1) or (2).
70
Court or VCAT may give persons opportunity to be heard
70 Court or VCAT may give persons opportunity to be heard
(1) A person who has been given notice in accordance with section 67 or 68 may be heard in relation to the application to vary or revoke a litigation restraint order.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the Court or VCAT may direct that the person make written submissions or oral submissions.
71
Determining application for variation or revocation
71 Determining application for variation or revocation
(1) A Court or VCAT may determine an application to vary or revoke a litigation restraint order on the basis of written submissions, without the appearance of—
(a) the person who made the application; or
(b) any person given notice of the application in accordance with section 67 or 68.
(2) Despite subsection (1), a Court or VCAT may determine an application referred to in subsection (1) by conducting an oral hearing if the Court or VCAT considers—
(3) An oral hearing may be held under subsection (2) regardless of—
(a) whether written submissions have been made to the Court or VCAT; and
(b) if submissions have been made, whether those submissions establish the matters required for the variation or revocation of the litigation restraint order or the dismissal of the application.
72
Notice of order to be given to Attorney-General
72 Notice of order to be given to Attorney-General
(1) If a Court or VCAT makes an order varying or revoking a litigation restraint order, the Court or VCAT (as the case requires) must ensure a copy of the order is given to the Attorney-General.
(2) Despite section 117(6) of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998, a copy of an order made by VCAT given to the Attorney-General under subsection (1) is not required to include a statement of reasons referred to in that section.
73
Notice of order to be given to Victorian courts and tribunals
73 Notice of order to be given to Victorian courts and tribunals
(1) If the Supreme Court makes an order varying or revoking a litigation restraint order, the Prothonotary of the Supreme Court must cause a copy of the order to be given—
(a) in the case of the variation or revocation of a general litigation restraint order or an extended litigation restraint order, to each Victorian court or tribunal; or
(b) in the case of the variation or revocation of a limited litigation restraint order, to the County Court, the Magistrates' Court and to VCAT.
(2) If the County Court makes an order varying or revoking a litigation restraint order, the registrar of the County Court must cause a copy of the order to be given to the Supreme Court, the Magistrates' Court and to VCAT.
(3) If the Magistrates' Court makes an order varying or revoking a litigation restraint order, the principal registrar of the Magistrates' Court must cause a copy of the order to be given—
(a) in the case of the variation or revocation of an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation, to the Supreme Court, the County Court, the Children's Court and to VCAT; or
(b) in any other case, to the Supreme Court, the County Court and to VCAT.
(4) If the Children's Court makes an order varying or revoking an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation, the principal registrar of the Children's Court must cause a copy of the order to be given to the Supreme Court, the County Court, the Magistrates' Court and to VCAT.
(5) If VCAT makes an order varying or revoking a litigation restraint order, the principal registrar of VCAT must cause a copy of the order to be given to the Supreme Court, the County Court and the Magistrates' Court.
(6) Despite section 117(6) of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998, a copy of an order made by VCAT given to a Court under subsection (5) is not required to include a statement of reasons referred to in that section.
Division 2—Variation or revocation application prevention orders
74
Court or VCAT may make variation or revocation application prevention order
74 Court or VCAT may make variation or revocation application prevention order
(1) Subject to subsection (2), a Court or VCAT may make a variation or revocation application prevention order in respect of a person who is subject to a litigation restraint order if satisfied that—
(a) the person has frequently made applications for leave to vary or revoke a litigation restraint order; and
(b) the applications are vexatious applications.
(2) The Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court may make a variation or revocation application prevention order in respect of a person who is subject to an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation if satisfied that—
(a) the person has frequently made applications for leave to vary or revoke the extended litigation restraint order; and
(b) the applications are vexatious applications.
(3) A variation or revocation application prevention order referred to in subsection (1) or (2) may only be made by the Court that made the litigation restraint order or by VCAT (as the case requires).
(4) A variation or revocation application prevention order made under subsection (1) or (2) may direct that a person must not do either or both of the following for the period specified by the Court or by VCAT—
(a) continue an application for leave to vary or revoke a litigation restraint order;
(b) apply for leave to vary or revoke a litigation restraint order.
75
Effect of variation or revocation application prevention order
75 Effect of variation or revocation application prevention order
On the making of a variation or revocation application prevention order, subject to the terms of the order—
(a) an application to which the order relates is stayed; and
(b) an application made in contravention of the order is of no effect.
76
Order does not affect other applications or proceedings
76 Order does not affect other applications or proceedings
A variation or revocation application prevention order made by a Court or VCAT does not affect a person's right—
(a) to make or continue another type of interlocutory application in a Victorian court or tribunal; or
(b) to commence or continue a proceeding in a Victorian court or tribunal.
The terms of a litigation restraint order may restrict a person's right to make or continue an interlocutory application or commence or continue a proceeding in a Victorian court or tribunal.
77
Duration of order
77 Duration of order
(1) A variation or revocation application prevention order remains in force for the period specified in the order.
(2) A Court or VCAT may specify that a variation or revocation application prevention order remains in force indefinitely.
(3) A Court or VCAT may extend the duration of a variation or revocation application prevention order referred to in subsection (1) if the Court or VCAT considers it is in the interests of justice to do so.
Part 10
Appeals
Part 10—Appeals
78
Application of this Part
78 Application of this Part
This Part applies despite anything to the contrary in a litigation restraint order.
79
Appeal of decisions to which this Part applies
79 Appeal of decisions to which this Part applies
With leave of the Supreme Court, a person may appeal on a question of law arising in any of the following decisions of a Victorian court or tribunal—
(a) a decision to refuse leave to apply for a litigation restraint order;
(b) a decision to make a litigation restraint order or an acting in concert order;
(c) a decision to refuse to make a litigation restraint order or an acting in concert order;
(d) a decision to vary or revoke a litigation restraint order;
(e) a decision to refuse to vary or revoke a litigation restraint order;
(f) subject to any appeal restriction order, a decision to refuse an application for leave to proceed.
See also section 8.
80
No notice of application to be given without direction or order
80 No notice of application to be given without direction or order
Despite anything to the contrary in any other Act or rules of court, a person who makes an application for leave to appeal a decision to which this Part applies must not give notice of the application unless the Supreme Court—
(a) otherwise directs the applicant under section 81 or 82; or
81
Direction as to giving notice of application
81 Direction as to giving notice of application
(1) This section applies if the Supreme Court considers that an application for leave to appeal a decision to which this Part applies, other than an application to appeal a decision that relates to intervention order legislation, should proceed.
(2) The Supreme Court must direct the applicant for leave to appeal to give notice of the application to the following persons—
(a) in the case of an application for leave to appeal a decision to refuse leave to apply for a litigation restraint order, the person who is the subject of the proposed order;
(b) in the case of an application for leave to appeal a decision to make a litigation restraint order or an acting in concert order—
(ii) the person (if any) who applied for the order; and
(iii) the person (if any) who is protected by the order;
(c) in the case of an application for leave to appeal a decision to refuse to make a litigation restraint order or an acting in concert order, the person who is the subject of the proposed order;
(d) in the case of an application for leave to appeal the variation or revocation of a litigation restraint order, the person who is or was the subject of the litigation restraint order;
(e) in the case of an application for leave to appeal a decision to refuse to vary or revoke a litigation restraint order—
(ii) the person (if any) who applied for the litigation restraint order; and
(iii) the person (if any) who is protected by the litigation restraint order;
(f) in the case of an application for leave to appeal a decision to refuse an application for leave to proceed—
(ii) the person (if any) who made the application for the litigation restraint order to which the application for leave to proceed relates; and
(iii) the persons who are named in the proposed interlocutory application or proceeding.
(3) The Supreme Court may make any other order in relation to the notification of persons that it considers appropriate in the circumstances.
(a) include a copy of the application for leave to appeal; and
(b) state that the person given notice is entitled to be heard in relation to the application for leave to appeal.
82
Direction as to giving notice of application—intervention order legislation
82 Direction as to giving notice of application—intervention order legislation
(1) This section applies if the Supreme Court considers that an application for leave to appeal a decision to which this Part applies that relates to intervention order legislation should proceed.
(2) The Supreme Court must direct the Prothonotary to cause notice of the application to be given to the following persons—
(a) in the case of an application for leave to appeal a decision to refuse leave to apply for an extended litigation restraint order, the person who is the subject of the proposed order;
(b) in the case of an application for leave to appeal a decision to make an extended litigation restraint order or an acting in concert order—
(ii) the person (if any) who applied for the order; and
(iii) the person (if any) who is protected by the order;
(c) in the case of an application for leave to appeal a decision to refuse to make an extended litigation restraint order or an acting in concert order, the person who is the subject of the proposed order;
(d) in the case of an application for leave to appeal the variation or revocation of an extended litigation restraint order, the person who is or was the subject of the extended litigation restraint order;
(e) in the case of an application for leave to appeal a decision to refuse to vary or revoke an extended litigation restraint order—
(ii) the person (if any) who applied for the extended litigation restraint order; and
(iii) the person (if any) who is protected by the extended litigation restraint order;
(f) in the case of an application for leave to appeal a decision to refuse an application for leave to proceed—
(ii) the person (if any) who made the application for the extended litigation restraint order to which the application for leave to proceed relates; and
(iii) the persons who are named in the proposed interlocutory application or proceeding.
(3) The Supreme Court may make any other order in relation to the notification of persons that it considers appropriate in the circumstances.
(a) include a copy of the application for leave to appeal; and
(b) state that the person given notice is entitled to be heard in relation to the application for leave to appeal.
83
Court may give persons opportunity to be heard
83 Court may give persons opportunity to be heard
(1) A person who has been given notice in accordance with section 81 or 82 may be heard in relation to the application for leave to appeal a decision to which this Part applies.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the Supreme Court may direct that the person make written submissions or oral submissions.
84
Determining application for leave to appeal
84 Determining application for leave to appeal
(1) The Supreme Court may determine an application for leave to appeal under this Part on the basis of written submissions, without the appearance of the person who made the application or any person given notice in accordance with section 81 or 82.
(2) Despite subsection (1), the Supreme Court may determine an application referred to in that subsection by conducting an oral hearing, if the Supreme Court considers—
(3) An oral hearing may be held under subsection (2) regardless of—
(a) whether written submissions have been made to the Supreme Court; and
(b) if submissions have been made, whether those submissions establish the matters required for the determination or dismissal of the application.
Part 11
Miscellaneous provisions
Part 11—Miscellaneous provisions
85
Attorney-General to publish copy of order
85 Attorney-General to publish copy of order
(1) The Attorney-General must cause a copy of any order given to the Attorney-General under this Act to be published in the Government Gazette.
(2) The Attorney-General may publish the details of the order in any other manner that the Attorney-General thinks fit, including on the Internet.
The Attorney-General may publish the details of a litigation restraint order or a variation or revocation of a litigation restraint order on the Internet on the Department's website.
(3) Subject to subsection (4), a copy of an order published under this section may have removed from it the name of any person or other entity protected by the order.
(4) A copy of an order published under this section that relates to intervention order legislation must have removed from it the name of any person protected by the order, including a child of a person protected by the order, unless the Court, when making the order, otherwise orders.
86
Publication of names—intervention order legislation
86 Publication of names—intervention order legislation
(1) At the time of making an order under this Act that relates to intervention order legislation, the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court may specify in the order that the name of the person protected by the order, or the name of his or her child, may be published by the Attorney-General under section 85.
(2) The Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court may only allow the publication of the particulars referred to in subsection (1) if—
(a) the court reasonably considers it is in the public interest to allow the publication of the particulars; and
(b) the court reasonably considers it is just to allow the publication in the circumstances.
87
Annual reports
87 Annual reports
(1) Each of the Courts and VCAT must give to the Attorney-General a report each financial year stating—
(a) the number of litigation restraint orders, acting in concert orders and appeal restriction orders made by the Court or by VCAT in that year; and
(b) the number of litigation restraint orders that were varied or revoked by the Court or by VCAT in that year; and
(c) any other prescribed matters.
(2) A report under subsection (1) must be given to the Attorney-General as soon as practicable after the end of the financial year to which it relates.
88
Rules of Court
88 Rules of Court
(1) Without limiting any other power to make rules of court, rules of court made by the authority having for the time being power to make rules regulating the practice and procedure of a court or tribunal may include rules for or with respect to any matter for which provision may be made under this Act by rules of court.
(2) Rules of court made under this Act may regulate generally the practice and procedure of a court or tribunal under this Act.
89
Regulations
89 Regulations
(1) The Governor in Council may make regulations for or with respect to any matter or thing required or permitted by this Act to be prescribed or necessary to be prescribed to give effect to this Act.
(2) The regulations may—
(a) be of general or limited application; and
(b) differ according to differences in time, place or circumstances; and
(c) confer a discretionary authority or impose a duty on a specified person or body or class of persons or bodies; and
(d) leave any matter or thing to be from time to time determined, applied, dispensed with or regulated by a specified person; and
(e) provide in a specified case or class of cases for the exemption of persons or things or a class of persons or things from any of the provisions of the regulations—
(i) whether unconditionally or on specified conditions; and
(ii) either wholly or to any extent that is specified; and
(f) apply, adopt or incorporate any matter contained in any document, code, standard, rule, specification or method, formulated, issued, prescribed or published by any other person, whether—
(i) wholly or partially or as amended by the regulations; or
(ii) as formulated, issued, prescribed or published at the time the regulations are made or at any time before then; or
(iii) as formulated, issued, prescribed or published from time to time.
Part 12
Transitional provisions
Part 12—Transitional provisions
90
Application of Interpretation of Legislation Act 1984
90 Application of Interpretation of Legislation Act 1984
Except where the contrary intention appears, this Part does not affect or take away from the Interpretation of Legislation Act 1984.
91
Supreme Court Act 1986—orders declaring person to be vexatious litigant
91 Supreme Court Act 1986—orders declaring person to be vexatious litigant
(1) An order declaring a person to be a vexatious litigant made under section 21(2) of the Supreme Court Act 1986 as in force immediately before the repeal of section 21 of that Act is taken on and from that repeal to be a general litigation restraint order made by the Supreme Court under section 29 of this Act.
(2) The terms of a general litigation restraint order referred to in subsection (1) are the same as the terms of the order made under section 21(2) of the Supreme Court Act 1986 as in force immediately before its repeal, unless those terms are otherwise varied or revoked under this Act.
92
Supreme Court Act 1986—applications not heard or determined before repeal of section 21
92 Supreme Court Act 1986—applications not heard or determined before repeal of section 21
If immediately before the repeal of section 21 of the Supreme Court Act 1986, an application has been made under that section but the Supreme Court has not begun to hear and determine that application, on and from that repeal—
(a) the application is taken to be an application made by the Attorney-General under section 28 of this Act for a general litigation restraint order; and
93
Supreme Court Act 1986—applications not determined before repeal of section 21
93 Supreme Court Act 1986—applications not determined before repeal of section 21
(1) Despite the repeal of section 21 of the Supreme Court Act 1986, that section, as in force immediately before its repeal, continues to apply to the hearing and determination of an application under section 21(1) of that Act if, immediately before that repeal—
(a) the Supreme Court has begun to hear and determine the application; and
(2) If an order declaring a person to be a vexatious litigant is made in accordance with subsection (1) by the Supreme Court under section 21(2) of the Supreme Court Act 1986 as in force immediately before its repeal, on the making of the order—
(a) the order declaring a person to be a vexatious litigant is taken to be a general litigation restraint order made by the Supreme Court under section 29 of this Act; and
(b) the terms of the general litigation restraint order are the same as the terms of the order made under section 21(2) of the Supreme Court Act 1986 as in force immediately before its repeal, unless those terms are otherwise varied or revoked under this Act.
94
Family Violence Protection Act 2008—orders declaring person to be vexatious litigant
94 Family Violence Protection Act 2008—orders declaring person to be vexatious litigant
(1) Subject to section 96, an order declaring a person to be a vexatious litigant made under section 193 of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 and in force immediately before the repeal of Part 11 of that Act is taken on and from that repeal to be—
(a) in the case of an order made by the Magistrates' Court, an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made by the Magistrates' Court under section 19 of this Act; or
(b) in the case of an order made by the Children's Court, an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made by the Children's Court under section 19 of this Act.
(2) The terms of an extended litigation restraint order referred to in subsection (1) are the same as the terms of the order made under section 193 of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008, as in force immediately before its repeal, unless those terms are otherwise varied or revoked under this Act.
95
Family Violence Protection Act 2008—applications not heard and determined before repeal of Part 11
95 Family Violence Protection Act 2008—applications not heard and determined before repeal of Part 11
(1) If immediately before the repeal of Part 11 of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008, an application has been made under section 189 of that Act but the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court has not begun to hear and determine that application, on and from that repeal—
(a) the application is taken to be—
(i) in the case of an application made by the Attorney-General—an application made by the Attorney-General under section 18 of this Act for an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation; or
(ii) in the case of an application made by a person referred to in section 189(1)(b), (c) or (d) of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008—an application made under section 18 of this Act by a person referred to in section 18(1)(b) for an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation; and
(2) If immediately before the repeal of Part 11 of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008, an application referred to in section 194 of that Act has been made but the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court has not begun to hear and determine that application, on and from that repeal—
(a) the application is taken to be an application for leave to proceed made under section 52(2) of this Act; and
(3) If immediately before the repeal of Part 11 of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008, an application has been made under section 197 of that Act but the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court has not begun to hear and determine that application, on and from that repeal—
(a) the application is taken to be an application made under section 65 of this Act for the variation or revocation of an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation; and
(4) If immediately before the repeal of Part 11 of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008, an application has been made under section 195 of that Act but the Supreme Court or the County Court has not begun to hear and determine that application, on and from that repeal—
(a) the application is taken to be an application made under section 79 of this Act for leave to appeal against an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation; and
96
Family Violence Protection Act 2008—applications not determined before repeal of Part 11
96 Family Violence Protection Act 2008—applications not determined before repeal of Part 11
(1) Despite the repeal of Part 11 of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008, that Part, as in force immediately before its repeal, continues to apply to the hearing and determination of an application under section 189, 194, 195 or 197 of that Act if, immediately before that repeal—
(a) a Court has begun to hear and determine the application; and
(2) If an order declaring a person to be a vexatious litigant is made in accordance with subsection (1) by the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court under section 193 of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 as in force immediately before its repeal, on the making of the order—
(a) that order is taken to be—
(i) in the case of an order made by the Magistrates' Court, an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made by the Magistrates' Court under section 19 of this Act; or
(ii) in the case of an order made by the Children's Court, an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made by the Children's Court under section 19 of this Act; and
(b) the terms of the extended litigation restraint order are the terms of the order made under section 193 of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 as in force immediately before its repeal, unless those terms are otherwise varied or revoked under this Act.
(3) If an application for leave to make an application under the Family Violence Protection Act 2008, made by a person who is declared to be a vexatious litigant under Part 11 of that Act or Part 10 of the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010, is decided in accordance with subsection (1) by the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court under section 194 of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 as in force immediately before its repeal, on the deciding of that application—
(a) the applicant is taken to have been granted or refused leave under section 53 of this Act to commence or continue a proceeding (as the case requires); and
(b) the order declaring the person to be a vexatious litigant is taken to be—
(i) in the case of an order made by the Magistrates' Court, an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made by the Magistrates' Court under section 19 of this Act; or
(ii) in the case of an order made by the Children's Court, an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made by the Children's Court under section 19 of this Act; and
(c) the terms of the extended litigation restraint order are the terms of the order made under section 193 of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 as in force immediately before its repeal, unless those terms are otherwise varied or revoked under this Act.
(4) If an order varying an order declaring a person to be a vexatious litigant is made in accordance with subsection (1) by the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court under section 197 of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 as in force immediately before its repeal, on and from the date of the variation order, the order declaring a person to be a vexatious litigant is taken to be—
(a) in the case of an order made by the Magistrates' Court, an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made by the Magistrates' Court under section 19 of this Act, the terms of which are varied in accordance with the variation order; or
(b) in the case of an order made by the Children's Court, an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made by the Children's Court under section 19 of this Act, the terms of which are varied in accordance with the variation order.
(5) If the Supreme Court or the County Court, on an appeal under section 195 of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 being dealt with in accordance with subsection (1), determines that an order declaring a person to be a vexatious litigant is to remain in force, on and from the date of that determination—
(i) in the case of an order made by the Magistrates' Court, an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made by the Magistrates' Court under section 19 of this Act; or
(ii) in the case of an order made by the Children's Court, an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made by the Children's Court under section 19 of this Act; and
(b) the terms of the extended litigation restraint order are the terms of the order made under section 193 of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 as in force immediately before its repeal, unless those terms are otherwise varied or revoked under this Act.
97
Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010—orders declaring person to be vexatious litigant
97 Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010—orders declaring person to be vexatious litigant
(1) Subject to section 99, an order declaring a person to be a vexatious litigant made under section 165 of the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010 and in force immediately before the repeal of Part 10 of that Act is taken on and from that repeal to be—
(a) in the case of an order made by the Magistrates' Court, an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made by the Magistrates' Court under section 19 of this Act; or
(b) in the case of an order made by the Children's Court, an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made by the Children's Court under section 19 of this Act.
(2) The terms of an extended litigation restraint order referred to in subsection (1) are the same as the terms of the order made under section 165 of the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010 as in force immediately before its repeal, unless those terms are otherwise varied or revoked under this Act.
98
Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010—Applications not heard and determined before repeal of Part 10
98 Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010—Applications not heard and determined before repeal of Part 10
(1) If immediately before the repeal of Part 10 of the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010, an application has been made under section 161 of that Act but the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court has not begun to hear and determine that application, on and from that repeal—
(a) the application is taken to be—
(i) in the case of an application made by the Attorney-General—an application made by the Attorney-General under section 18 of this Act for an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation; or
(ii) in the case of an application made by a person referred to in section 161(1)(b), (c) or (d) of the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010—an application made under section 18 of this Act by a person referred to in section 18(1)(b) for an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation; and
(2) If immediately before the repeal of Part 10 of the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010, an application referred to in section 166 of that Act has been made but the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court has not begun to hear and determine that application, on and from that repeal—
(a) the application is taken to be an application for leave to proceed made under section 52(2) of this Act; and
(3) If immediately before the repeal of Part 10 of the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010, an application has been made under section 169 of that Act but the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court has not begun to hear and determine that application, on and from that repeal—
(a) the application is taken to be an application made under section 65 of this Act for the revocation or variation of an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation; and
(4) If immediately before the repeal of Part 10 of the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010, an application has been made under section 167 of that Act but the Supreme Court or the County Court has not begun to hear and determine that application, on and from that repeal—
(a) the application is taken to be an application made under section 79 of this Act for leave to appeal against an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation; and
99
Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010—applications not determined before repeal of Part 10
99 Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010—applications not determined before repeal of Part 10
(1) Despite the repeal of Part 10 of the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010, that Part, as in force immediately before its repeal, continues to apply to the hearing and determination of an application under section 161, 166, 167 or 169 of that Act if, immediately before that repeal—
(a) a Court has begun to hear and determine the application; and
(2) If an order declaring a person to be a vexatious litigant is made in accordance with subsection (1) by the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court under section 165 of the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010 as in force immediately before its repeal, on the making of the order—
(i) in the case of an order made by the Magistrates' Court, an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made by the Magistrates' Court under section 19 of this Act; or
(ii) in the case of an order made by the Children's Court, an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made by the Children's Court under section 19 of this Act; and
(b) the terms of the extended litigation restraint order are the terms of the order made under section 165 of the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010 as in force immediately before its repeal, unless those terms are otherwise varied or revoked under this Act.
(3) If an application for leave to make an application under the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010, made by a person who is declared to be a vexatious litigant under Part 10 of that Act or Part 11 of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008, is decided in accordance with subsection (1) by the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court under section 166 of the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010 as in force immediately before its repeal, on the deciding of that application—
(a) the applicant is taken to have been granted or refused leave under section 53 of this Act to commence or continue a proceeding (as the case requires); and
(b) the order declaring the person to be a vexatious litigant is taken to be—
(i) in the case of an order made by the Magistrates' Court, an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made by the Magistrates' Court under section 19 of this Act; or
(ii) in the case of an order made by the Children's Court, an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made by the Children's Court under section 19 of this Act; and
(c) the terms of the extended litigation restraint order are the terms of the order made under section 165 of the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010 as in force immediately before its repeal, unless those terms are otherwise varied or revoked under this Act.
(4) If an order to vary an order declaring a person to be a vexatious litigant is made in accordance with subsection (1) by the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court under section 169 of the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010 as in force immediately before its repeal, on and from the date of the variation order, the order declaring a person to be a vexatious litigant is taken to be—
(a) in the case of an order made by the Magistrates' Court, an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made by the Magistrates' Court under section 19 of this Act, the terms of which are varied in accordance with the variation order; or
(b) in the case of an order made by the Children's Court, an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made by the Children's Court under section 19 of this Act, the terms of which are varied in accordance with the variation order.
(5) If the Supreme Court or the County Court, on an appeal under section 167 of the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010 being dealt with in accordance with subsection (1), determines that an order declaring a person to be a vexatious litigant is to remain in force, on and from the date of that determination—
(i) in the case of an order made by the Magistrates' Court, an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made by the Magistrates' Court under section 19 of this Act; or
(ii) in the case of an order made by the Children's Court, an extended litigation restraint order that relates to intervention order legislation made by the Children's Court under section 19 of this Act; and
(b) the terms of the extended litigation restraint order are the terms of the order made under section 165 of the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010, as in force immediately before its repeal, unless those terms are otherwise varied or revoked under this Act.
S. 100 repealed by No. 42/2014 s. 100(4).
101
Power to resolve transitional difficulties in proceeding
101 Power to resolve transitional difficulties in proceeding
(1) If any difficulty arises because of the operation of this Act in relation to a proceeding to which this Part applies, a Court or VCAT may make any order it considers appropriate to resolve the difficulty.
(2) An order made under subsection (1)—
(a) may be made on application of a party to the proceeding or on the Court's or VCAT's own motion, as the case requires; and
(b) has effect despite any provision to the contrary made by or under any Act (other than the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006).
Pt 13 (Heading and ss 102–137) repealed by No. 42/2014 s. 137.
═══════════════
Endnotes
1 General information
See www.legislation.vic.gov.au for Victorian Bills, Acts and current Versions of legislation and up-to-date legislative information.
Minister's second reading speech—
Legislative Assembly: 19 February 2014
Legislative Council: 3 April 2014
The long title for the Bill for this Act was "A Bill for an Act to reform and consolidate the law relating to vexatious proceedings in courts and tribunals, to make consequential amendments to various Acts and for other purposes."
The Vexatious Proceedings Act 2014 was assented to on 17 June 2014 and came into operation on 31 October 2014: section 2(2).
INTERPRETATION OF LEGISLATION ACT 1984 (ILA)
Style changes
Section 54A of the ILA authorises the making of the style changes set out in Schedule 1 to that Act.
References to ILA s. 39B
Sidenotes which cite ILA s. 39B refer to section 39B of the ILA which provides that where an undivided section or clause of a Schedule is amended by the insertion of one or more subsections or subclauses, the original section or clause becomes subsection or subclause (1) and is amended by the insertion of the expression "(1)" at the beginning of the original section or clause.
Interpretation
As from 1 January 2001, amendments to section 36 of the ILA have the following effects:
• Headings
All headings included in an Act which is passed on or after 1 January 2001 form part of that Act. Any heading inserted in an Act which was passed before 1 January 2001, by an Act passed on or after 1 January 2001, forms part of that Act. This includes headings to Parts, Divisions or Subdivisions in a Schedule; sections; clauses; items; tables; columns; examples; diagrams; notes or forms. See section 36(1A)(2A).
• Examples, diagrams or notes
All examples, diagrams or notes included in an Act which is passed on or after 1 January 2001 form part of that Act. Any examples, diagrams or notes inserted in an Act which was passed before 1 January 2001, by an Act passed on or after 1 January 2001, form part of that Act. See section 36(3A).
• Punctuation
All punctuation included in an Act which is passed on or after 1 January 2001 forms part of that Act. Any punctuation inserted in an Act which was passed before 1 January 2001, by an Act passed on or after 1 January 2001, forms part of that Act. See section 36(3B).
• Provision numbers
All provision numbers included in an Act form part of that Act, whether inserted in the Act before, on or after 1 January 2001. Provision numbers include section numbers, subsection numbers, paragraphs and subparagraphs. See section 36(3C).
• Location of "legislative items"
A "legislative item" is a penalty, an example or a note. As from 13 October 2004, a legislative item relating to a provision of an Act is taken to be at the foot of that provision even if it is preceded or followed by another legislative item that relates to that provision. For example, if a penalty at the foot of a provision is followed by a note, both of these legislative items will be regarded as being at the foot of that provision. See section 36B.
• Other material
Any explanatory memorandum, table of provisions, endnotes, index and other material printed after the Endnotes does not form part of an Act.
See section 36(3)(3D)(3E).
2 Table of Amendments
This publication incorporates amendments made to the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2014 by Acts and subordinate instruments.
| Assent Date: | 17.6.14 |
| Commencement Date: | 31.10.14: s. 2(2) |
| Note: | S. 137 repealed Pt 13 (ss 102–137) on 31.10.15; s. 100(4) repealed s. 100 on 31.10.16 |
| Current State: | This information relates only to the provision/s amending the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2014 |
Statute Law Revision Act 2015, No. 21/2015
| Assent Date: | 16.6.15 |
| Commencement Date: | S. 3(Sch. 1 item 60) on 1.8.15: s. 2(1) |
| Current State: | This information relates only to the provision/s amending the Vexatious ProceedingsAct2014 |
Justice Legislation Amendment (Court Security, Juries and Other Matters) Act 2017, No. 38/2017
| Assent Date: | 29.8.17 |
| Commencement Date: | S. 95 on 30.8.17: s. 2(1) |
| Current State: | This information relates only to the provision/s amending the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2014 |
There are no amendments which were Not in Operation at the date of this publication.
4 Explanatory details
No entries at date of publication.
Source text: opening excerpt
Sourced from Victorian Legislation (legislation.vic.gov.au), CC BY 4.0.
1 Vexatious Proceedings Act 2014
Version No. 011
Vexatious Proceedings Act 2014
No. 42 of 2014
Version incorporating amendments as at
30 August 2017
TABLE OF PROVISIONS
Section Page
Part 1—Preliminary 1
1 Purpose 1
2 Commencement 1
3 Definitions 1
4 Meaning of acting in concert 7
5 Meaning of interlocutory application 8
6 Application of Act 8
7 Act prevails to extent of inconsistency 9
8 Act does not limit certain other jurisdictions 9
9 Constitution of VCAT 9
Part 2—Limited litigation restraint orders 10
10 Applying for limited litigation restraint order 10
11 Court or VCAT may make limited litigation restraint order 11
12 Content of limited litigation restraint order 12
13 Effect of limited litigation restraint order 12
14 Limited litigation restraint order does not affect certain applications or proceedings 13
15 Duration of limited litigation restraint order 13
Part 3—Extended litigation restraint orders 14
16 Application for extended litigation restraint order 14
17 Court or VCAT may make extended litigation restraint order 14
18 Application for extended litigation restraint order—intervention order legislation 16
19 Magistrates' Court or Children's Court may make extended litigation restraint order—intervention order legislation 17
20 Content of extended litigation restraint order made by Supreme Court 17
21 Content of extended litigation restraint order made by County Court 18
22 Content of extended litigation restraint order made by Magistrates' Court 19
23 Content of extended litigation restraint order made by Children's Court 21
24 Content of extended litigation restraint order made by VCAT 22
25 Effect of extended litigation restraint order on proceeding 23
26 Extended litigation restraint order does not affect certain proceedings 23
27 Duration of extended litigation restraint order 24
Part 4—General litigation restraint orders 25
The Act also regulates procedural mechanics. It preserves the court’s inherent and implied jurisdictions (s 8), gives the Act precedence to the extent of inconsistency with other statutory or common law powers (s 7), and requires VCAT to be constituted by a member who is an Australian lawyer when exercising powers under the Act (s 9). It provides for limited notice and confidentiality regimes: applications for leave to proceed, and applications to vary or revoke orders, must not be notified unless a court directs it (see ss 59, 66); when notice is directed, specific persons must be notified (see ss 60-61, 67-68). The Attorney‑General must be given copies of orders (s 47), and the Attorney‑General must publish orders in the Government Gazette and may publish otherwise (s 85), with special protective rules for intervention order legislation (s 85(4), s 86).
The Act contains transitional measures converting previous vexatious-litigant orders made under the Supreme Court Act 1986, the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 and the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010 into the new categories of litigation restraint orders (Part 12, ss 91-99). The Act commenced on 31 October 2014 (s 2(2)) and has been the vehicle for consolidating and reforming Victoria’s vexatious‑litigant law (s 1 sets the statutory purpose).
Main concepts
The statute builds around a small set of legal concepts and statutory definitions that determine scope and effect.
Vexatious application and vexatious proceeding (s 3). The Act defines both terms inclusively by reference to abuse of process, harassment or wrongful purpose, lack of reasonable grounds, and conduct that causes delay or detriment. Those definitions govern the substantive inquiry courts make when considering whether restraint orders or leave should be granted (see ss 11(1), 17(1), 29(1), 37(1)).
Litigation restraint orders (s 3). This umbrella term covers limited, extended and general litigation restraint orders (Parts 2-4). Each is targeted differently. A limited litigation restraint order is case‑specific and restricts interlocutory applications in a particular proceeding (ss 11-15). An extended litigation restraint order addresses repeated vexatious litigation frequently brought against a person or about a matter and can apply across a court’s jurisdiction (Part 3, ss 16-27). A general litigation restraint order (Part 4, ss 28-33) is the most expansive, made only by the Supreme Court and directed to persons who persistently and without reasonable grounds commence or conduct vexatious proceedings (s 29(1), s 30).
Acting in concert (s 4). The Act treats persons acting in concert with a restrained litigant as potential subjects of restraint: orders can extend to persons acting in concert and can impose corresponding litigation restraint terms (s 35). The Act explains who is “acting in concert” (s 4(1)) and excludes, explicitly, legal practitioners, litigation guardians and authorised persons acting for another as acting in concert (s 4(2)). The provision recognises proxies and collusion as mechanisms by which constrained conduct might be evaded.
Leave to proceed (Parts 8). Where a restraint order applies, the person affected must seek leave to make or continue the restricted applications or proceedings (ss 50-55). The leave tests are centrally twofold: the proposed application or proceeding must not be vexatious and there must be reasonable grounds (ss 51(1), 53(a)-(b), 55(a)-(b)). The Act mandates substantive disclosure in leave applications (s 56) and allows courts to impose conditions, including security for costs (s 64).
Appeals and appeal restrictions (Part 6 and Part 10). The Supreme Court and other courts can make appeal restriction orders that remove or limit the right to appeal decisions refusing leave (ss 37-42). Part 10 provides the pathway and gatekeeping arrangements for appeals from decisions under the Act: a person requires leave of the Supreme Court to appeal on a question of law in enumerated decisions (s 79), and the Act prescribes notification rules for leave to appeal (ss 80-84).
Procedural controls and secrecy (ss 59-61, 66-68). The Act imposes limits on notice for leave and variation applications: applicants must not give notice unless the relevant court directs or orders it (ss 59, 66). When notice is given by court direction, specific persons must be notified and copies of applications provided; the court can allow written rather than oral submissions (ss 60-63, 67-71).
Interaction with intervention order legislation (multiple provisions). “Intervention order legislation” (s 3) , principally the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 and the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010 , is treated as a distinct class for extended restraint orders, acting in concert orders and appeal restriction orders. Specific rules modify scope (see ss 18-19, 22-23, 36, 39) and place explicit limits on publication of the names of protected persons (ss 85(4), 86).
Operationally, the Act gives courts and VCAT a broad, discretionary toolbox to control litigants,orders can be made on application or on the court's own motion (see ss 11(4), 17(4), 29(4), 35(2)). The immediate procedural effect of many orders is automatic: a restraint order stays the relevant proceeding on being made and renders any contravening start or application of no effect (see ss 13, 25, 32, 40, 75). The Act therefore merges substantive determinations about vexatiousness with procedural mechanisms to prevent further litigation activity.
Who it affects
The Act identifies the population it regulates and specific institutional actors who participate in administration.
Subjects of orders: Any person may be the subject of a litigation restraint order, acting in concert order, appeal restriction order or variation or revocation application prevention order (see definitions in s 3 and the operative provisions in Parts 2-9). Orders can be tailored to a person, named entities or a described matter (for example, s 20(1)(a) allows the Supreme Court to restrict proceedings “against a person or other entity named in the order, or in respect of a matter described in the order”).
Persons protected by orders: The Act contemplates orders made to protect identified persons or entities from repeated vexatious litigation. In intervention order contexts that protection may extend to a protected person’s child; the Magistrates’ Court and Children’s Court provisions make that explicit (see ss 22(2), 23(1)).
Applicants: Who may bring an application depends on the order type. For limited and extended restraint orders, the Attorney‑General, “the person who has been made the subject” (if the applicant is the victim of the vexatious application), or any person with a sufficient interest may apply (ss 10(1), 16(1)). For general litigation restraint orders only the Attorney‑General may apply to the Supreme Court (s 28). Acting in concert orders may be sought by the person who applied for the litigation restraint order or by a person named in a pending application who would be affected by it (s 34).
Courts and registrars: The Supreme Court, County Court, Magistrates’ Court, Children’s Court (for intervention legislation matters), VCAT and VOCAT are within the Act’s reach (s 3 definitions). Registrars and principal registrars have administrative duties under ss 44, 47-49, 72-73 to distribute copies of orders and to direct notifications. Section 57 expressly empowers specific court officers (Prothonotary, registrars, principal registrars) to refuse to accept for filing an application for leave to proceed unless satisfied it is materially different from a prior application.
Attorney‑General and executive: The Attorney‑General has multiple roles: a frequent applicant (ss 10, 16, 28); recipient of copies of orders (s 47); who must publish orders in the Government Gazette (s 85); and who may request documents from courts for the purpose of deciding whether to make an application (s 43). The Attorney‑General therefore has both informational rights and publication functions under the Act.
Legal representatives and authorised agents: The definition of “acting in concert” (s 4) expressly excludes legal practitioners acting for a person, litigation guardians, professional advocates and others authorised by law from being treated as acting in concert. That creates a safe harbour for lawyers and certain court‑appointed representatives.
Third parties with an interest: The Act contemplates persons who have a “sufficient interest” may apply for restraint orders (ss 10(1)(c), 16(1)(c), 18(1)(c)). The Act’s examples indicate that parties to related proceedings, police officers, guardians or family members seeking intervention orders may satisfy that test (s 10 example, s 18 example).
Who bears costs and burdens in practice: persons targeted by orders bear procedural burdens (need to seek leave, disclose prior litigation activity s 56, potentially provide security for costs as a condition of leave s 64). Applicants for orders other than the Attorney‑General must generally obtain leave to apply (ss 10(2), 16(2)), which imposes an up‑front gatekeeping cost. Registrars may refuse filings that appear materially the same (s 57), creating an administrative barrier. Courts may make costs orders against persons acting in concert (s 35(3)(e)) and the Act cross‑references existing costs regimes in intervention legislation (notes to ss 19 and 36). Publication and reporting obligations (ss 85, 87) affect the Attorney‑General and courts.
Key duties and rights
The Act creates duties for courts, registrars, applicants and the Attorney‑General and confers rights, principally procedural rights and rights of access subject to leave.
Duties on courts and tribunals
Procedural fairness duty to hear or afford opportunity to be heard (s 45). Subject to limited exceptions, courts and VCAT must not make orders without hearing the person or giving an opportunity to be heard. For intervention order legislation matters the Magistrates’ Court and Children’s Court must hear both the person to be subject to the order and the person to be protected (s 45(2)).
Requirement to ensure copies are provided to the Attorney‑General and other courts (ss 47-49). Courts and tribunal registrars must supply copies of orders to the Attorney‑General and, depending on the issuing court, to other courts and tribunals named in the section (s 48 prescribes recipients depending on issuing court).
Statement of reasons for intervention order related extended litigation restraint orders (s 46). If the Magistrates’ Court or Children’s Court makes an extended litigation restraint order relating to intervention order legislation, the order must include or be accompanied by a statement of reasons.
Reporting requirement (s 87). Each Court and VCAT must provide an annual report to the Attorney‑General summarising the number and types of litigation restraint, acting in concert and appeal restriction orders made, varied or revoked.
Rights and duties for applicants and persons subject to orders
Who may apply and leave regimes. The Attorney‑General, victims of vexatious applications and persons with a sufficient interest are entitled to apply for certain orders (ss 10(1), 16(1)). Non‑AG applicants generally must obtain leave to apply (ss 10(2), 16(2)). Persons subject to orders have the right to make applications for leave to proceed (Parts 8: ss 50-55), and to apply to vary or revoke an order (s 65) with leave in some cases.
Disclosure obligation when applying for leave (s 56). A person subject to a restraint order applying for leave to proceed must disclose prior applications for leave, prior interlocutory applications or proceedings that were vexatious or stayed/dismissed on the basis of lack of merit, and explain how the new application is materially different. Disclosure must be by affidavit unless court rules provide otherwise (s 56(2)).
Restricted notice: applicants must not give notice of applications for leave or variation unless directed by the court (ss 59, 66). Where direction is given, the court identifies persons to be notified and requires a copy of the application and an invitation to make submissions (ss 60-61, 67-68). Courts may limit oral appearances and may decide matters on written submissions (ss 62-64, 71 and 84).
Leave tests and conditional leave (ss 51, 53, 55, 64). Leave is discretionary with a substantive threshold: the application/proceeding must not be vexatious and must have reasonable grounds. Leave may be granted subject to conditions, e.g. security for costs (s 64 example).
Institutional duties and powers of registrars
Power to refuse to accept filings for leave applications if not materially different to prior ones (s 57). This places a gatekeeper duty on court administrative officers (specified by court) and can be overridden by direction from the court.
Attorney‑General’s duties and powers
Right to request documents from courts for deciding whether to seek an order (s 43). Courts may provide those documents.
Publication duty (s 85). The Attorney‑General must publish a copy of any order given to the Attorney‑General, at minimum in the Government Gazette, and may publish in other ways unless publication involves protected persons under intervention order legislation (s 85(3)-(4)).
Rights of appeal
Appeals require leave of the Supreme Court and are limited to questions of law in specified decisions (s 79). Where an appeal is permitted the Act prescribes notification rules and the court’s powers to determine the leave application on written submissions (ss 80-84).
Other procedural duties
Courts may act on their own motion to make orders (ss 11(4), 17(4), 29(4), 35(2)), but must comply with hearing/opportunity requirements (s 45) and give required notices when directed (ss 60-61, 67-68).
These duties and rights combine to produce a regulated path for both attempting to curb vexatious conduct and for restrained persons to seek judicial permission to continue legitimate litigation. The Act’s disclosure, registrar gatekeeping and leave rules concentrate evidentiary burden and administrative friction on persons who have been subject to prior vexatious findings or who are repeatedly litigating.
Penalties and enforcement
The Act does not create criminal offences; enforcement is procedural, civil and administrative. The principal enforcement mechanisms are injunctive‑style orders, automatic stays, striking out and the administrative refusal to accept filings. Key enforcement features and consequences are as follows.
Automatic stays and nullity
On the making of many orders, the Act provides for an immediate stay of the affected proceedings and declares that proceedings or interlocutory applications commenced in contravention of an order are of no effect. This is a direct procedural penalty: limited orders stay interlocutory applications in the specified proceeding (s 13), extended and general orders stay the relevant proceedings (ss 25, 32), and appeal restriction orders stay applications for leave to appeal (s 40). These statutory consequences mean that if a litigant ignores an order, the proceeding is treated as legally ineffectual.
Power to strike out and impose costs
The Act allows courts to strike out interlocutory applications and to stay proceedings when making acting in concert orders (s 35(3)(c)-(d)). Courts may also order that the person acting in concert is liable for costs (s 35(3)(e)). Costs consequences provide a monetary enforcement lever against non‑compliant or opportunistic users of process.
Registrar gatekeeping and administrative refusal
Registrars and principal registrars have express authority to refuse to accept leave applications for filing where the registrar is not satisfied that an application is materially different from a previous application made by the applicant (s 57). That administrative tool can function as an enforcement filter preventing repetition without judicial leave.
Conditions on leave, including security for costs
When leave is granted, courts may impose conditions (s 64). The Act’s example identifies deposit of funds with the court as security for costs. Such conditions operate as practical enforcement,requiring resources up front,or as a deterent.
Variation or revocation application prevention orders
Courts may make orders preventing a person from applying for variation or revocation of a litigation restraint order (s 74). These orders operate as an additional procedural restraint on litigants who repeatedly seek to vary or revoke restraint orders.
Appeal restriction orders
Courts may remove or limit the right to appeal specified decisions about leave (s 37(2), s 38(2), s 39(2)). Where an appeal restriction order is made, applications for leave to appeal are stayed and any appeal taken contrary to the order is of no effect (s 40). This reduces opportunities for interlocutory appeals that would otherwise prolong litigation.
Publication and reputational enforcement
The Attorney‑General must publish copies of orders given to the Attorney‑General (s 85). Publication in the Gazette and elsewhere may have reputational consequences for persons named in orders, subject to protections where the order relates to intervention order legislation (s 85(3)-(4), s 86).
Limits on enforcement and judicial discretion
The Act preserves inherent and implied jurisdiction of courts (s 8). Section 7 provides that the Act prevails to the extent of inconsistency with other statutory or common law powers, which consolidates enforcement in the Act’s framework but does not eliminate court discretion. The Act also repeatedly vests broad discretion in courts and tribunals to take any matters they consider relevant when deciding whether to make orders (see ss 11(2), 17(2), 29(2)).
No express criminal sanctions
The Act relies on civil process and court powers rather than criminal sanctions. There are no fines or imprisonment provisions in the text. Enforcement therefore operates through denial of civil process, costs, and administrative blocking of filings rather than criminal penalties.
The enforcement architecture places weight on judicial and administrative decision‑making rather than prescriptive statutory penalties. The substantive sanctions are loss of access to courts unless leave is obtained, exposure to costs, and potential reputational publication.
How it interacts with other laws
The Act is framed to operate across Victorian courts and tribunals and to co‑exist with, and where necessary, displace inconsistent statutory powers.
Primacy and preservation
To the extent of inconsistency, the Act prevails over any statutory jurisdiction, common law power or power under any other Act (s 7). This gives it primacy when a conflict arises between this Act’s restraint regime and other statutory procedural powers in Victorian courts and tribunals. Section 8 provides an important textual limit: it does not limit the Supreme Court’s inherent jurisdiction or a court’s implied jurisdiction. That preserves baseline judicial control and suggests the Act should be read as complementing, rather than entirely displacing, inherent powers.
Application across jurisdictions
The definition of an “Australian court or tribunal” (s 3) includes courts and tribunals of the Commonwealth and of other States and Territories, and the definition of “Victorian court or tribunal” lists the courts and tribunals within Victoria (s 3). However, the powers conferred are expressed as applying to Victorian courts and tribunals (s 6(1)). The Act therefore governs litigation in Victorian courts and tribunals, but it recognises, for evidentiary and relevance purposes, orders and conduct in other Australian courts and tribunals (the courts may take into account previous orders made elsewhere when deciding about restraint orders , see ss 11(2)(b), 17(2)(b), 29(2)(b)).
Interaction with intervention order legislation
The Act contains tailored provisions for “intervention order legislation” (defined in s 3 to include Family Violence Protection Act 2008 and Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010, among others). For extended orders that relate to intervention order legislation there are distinct application pathways (ss 18-19), content rules (ss 22-23), publication protections (s 85(4), s 86), and special costs cross‑references (notes to ss 19 and 36 referencing s 154 of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 and s 111 of the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010). These carve outs reflect interactional adjustments to protect victims and the particular practices of intervention orders.
Transitional conversion of prior orders
The Act provides explicit transitional provisions converting prior vexatious‑litigant orders under the Supreme Court Act 1986, the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 and the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010 into the new categories of this Act (ss 91-99). Those provisions preserve the terms of existing orders unless varied or revoked under the new Act. The transitional scheme therefore preserves continuity, ensuring existing orders remain enforceable and are migrated into the new framework.
VCAT rules and requirements
When exercising powers under the Act VCAT must be constituted by a member who is an Australian lawyer (s 9). The Act also modifies VCAT’s usual rules on statements of reasons to the Attorney‑General: copies of VCAT orders given to the Attorney‑General under s 47 or to courts under s 48(5) and s 73(5) do not have to include statements of reasons otherwise required by s 117(6) of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (see ss 47(2), 48(6), 73(6)). This changes ordinary VCAT practice when interacting with the Attorney‑General and courts under this Act.
Rules and regulations
The Act contemplates enabling rules and regulations that may regulate practice and procedure (s 88) and authorises broad regulation‑making powers (s 89). Rules of court made under the Act may regulate practice and procedure for matters within the Act (s 88). Those subordinate instruments will govern detailed interaction points with existing procedural rules.
Limits on notice and publication
The Act imposes statutory limits and pathways for notification of leave, variation and appeal applications (ss 59-61, 66-68, 80-82). It requires a court’s direction before notice can be given, which interacts practically with other civil procedure rules that assume notice of proceedings. Publication of orders is mandated to the Attorney‑General and then to the Gazette (s 85), but the Act permits removal of names of protected persons from published copies in intervention order cases (s 85(3)-(4)) and allows the Magistrates’ Court or Children’s Court to permit publication in exceptional public interest circumstances (s 86).
Overall, the Act is drafted to be the principal statutory instrument for managing vexatious litigation in Victoria and to operate alongside existing procedural rules and tribunal statutes. It both displaces inconsistent statutory powers and leaves room for inherent jurisdiction and context‑specific adjustments, particularly where intervention order matters and victim privacy are concerned.
Amendment history
The Act as published incorporates a small number of amendments and contains transitional repeal and conversion clauses.
Key dates and instrument changes
Assent and commencement. The Vexatious Proceedings Act 2014 received assent on 17 June 2014 and came into operation on 31 October 2014 by s 2(2) (see endnotes and s 2).
Repeals of Part 13 and s 100. The table of provisions and endnotes record that Part 13 (ss 102-137) was repealed on 31 October 2015 and that section 100(4) repealed s 100 on 31 October 2016 (endnotes section).
Statute Law Revision and Justice Legislation Amendment. The text as provided incorporates amendments by the Statute Law Revision Act 2015 (No. 21/2015), which commenced item 60 in sch 1 on 1 August 2015 (endnotes), and by the Justice Legislation Amendment (Court Security, Juries and Other Matters) Act 2017 (No. 38/2017), with s 95 commencing on 30 August 2017 (endnotes). The marginal notes in the Act identify specific amendments, for example the note to s 3 records that the definition of legal practitioner was amended by No. 38/2017 s 95(1), and s 9 was amended by No. 38/2017 s 95(2).
Transitional provisions. Part 12 (ss 90-101) contains an extensive transitional scheme. Sections 91-99 in particular convert orders declared under prior statutes into the corresponding classes of orders under this Act. For example, s 91 converts Supreme Court “vexatious litigant” orders under s 21(2) of the Supreme Court Act 1986 into general litigation restraint orders under s 29 of this Act. Sections 94-99 perform similar conversions for Family Violence Protection Act 2008 and Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010 orders, with preservation of existing terms (ss 94(2), 97(2)) unless varied or revoked.
Citation of consequential instruments
The Act’s endnotes list the amending Acts and give assent and commencement dates for those amendments. The edition provided is “Version incorporating amendments as at 30 August 2017” (top matter). The Statute Law Revision Act 2015 and the Justice Legislation Amendment Act 2017 are expressly recorded (endnotes 2).
No further amendment history details or explanatory memoranda are included in the provided text beyond the references to the Minister’s second reading speech in the endnotes (Legislative Assembly 19 February 2014; Legislative Council 3 April 2014). The Act’s text itself includes notes and examples that illustrate legislative intent and specify interaction with repealed provisions (Part 12 transitional provisions).
Litigation history
The Act’s text does not list judicial decisions interpreting its provisions. The only materials in the provided source relevant to legislative history are the parliamentary procedural notes and the endnotes recording the ministerial second reading speech references and the assent and commencement dates (endnotes). In short, there is no case law contained in the source to report.
What the Act itself records about prior legal history
The Act replaces and consolidates prior statutory schemes for declaring vexatious litigants. The transitional provisions (Part 12, ss 91-99) convert existing orders under the Supreme Court Act 1986 (s 21), the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 (Part 11), and the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010 (Part 10) into orders under the new Act. Those provisions preserve existing orders and terms, unless varied or revoked under the Act.
The Explanatory endnotes note the Bill’s long title and reference the Minister’s second reading speech in the Legislative Assembly and the Legislative Council (endnotes). They also record the Act’s policy purpose in s 1: to reform and consolidate the law relating to vexatious proceedings and to balance access to courts with interests in efficient justice (s 1).
What is absent in the text provided
The statute does not include any reported judicial decisions, examples of judicial application, or statistical litigation outcomes. It also does not supply guidance about the Act’s post‑commencement interpretation by courts. Users should therefore consult reported decisions and tribunal determinations after the Act’s commencement when seeking examples of application or judicial reasoning.
For practitioners preparing submissions under the Act or advising clients, the absence of adjudicative material in the statutory text means reliance will be necessary on subsequent case law, court practice notes and rules of court. The Act’s internal references to how courts “may” take matters into account (see ss 11(2), 17(2), 29(2)) indicate that judicial development of doctrine is expected.
Gotchas
The Act contains procedural rules and drafting features that have concrete, sometimes non‑obvious, legal effects. The following are practical traps and points that commonly matter in advising litigants and courts.
Notice is strictly controlled; secret gatekeeping is allowed (ss 59, 66, 80). Applicants for leave to proceed, for variation/revocation, and applicants for leave to appeal must not give notice unless the court directs. That means affected persons may not receive advance warning of an application unless the court orders or directs it. If you represent an applicant or an affected person, do not assume automatic notice. Instead, anticipate the court directing who must be given notice under ss 60-61 and 67-68 and prepare for written submissions rather than an oral hearing (see ss 62-63, 71).
Registrar refusal powers can block filings (s 57). Specified registrars may refuse to accept for filing an application for leave to proceed if not satisfied it is materially different to a prior one. Practitioners should ensure an application clearly sets out material differences and file the affidavit disclosures required by s 56 to avoid administrative refusal.
Disclosure obligations are strict and evidential (s 56). An applicant for leave must provide details (often by affidavit) of prior applications, prior proceedings declared vexatious or stayed/dismissed for lack of merit, and explain material differences. Failure to comply can result in dismissal or refusal to accept the filing. The required disclosure includes matters adverse to the applicant (s 56(1)(e)).
VCAT composition and statement‑of‑reasons exceptions (s 9, ss 47(2), 48(6), 73(6)). VCAT must be constituted by an Australian lawyer when exercising powers under this Act (s 9), and copies of certain VCAT orders given to the Attorney‑General or courts need not include statements of reasons otherwise required by s 117(6) of the VCAT Act. That can affect appeals and judicial review strategies that depend on reasoned decisions.
Acting in concert has defined exceptions (s 4(2)). Legal practitioners, litigation guardians, professional advocates and persons authorised by law are not treated as acting in concert. However, a court may still make acting in concert orders against others. When evaluating risk of an “acting in concert” order, examine whether the defendant is truly a proxy or a legally authorised representative safely excluded by s 4(2).
Orders are capable of indefinite duration and extension (ss 27(2), 33(2), 42(2)). Courts may specify that orders remain in force indefinitely and may extend them. Indefinite duration raises present and future access‑to‑justice implications, and should be a focus of variation or revocation applications.
Publication and privacy in intervention order contexts (ss 85(3)-(4), 86). The Attorney‑General publishes orders, but where an order relates to intervention order legislation the Act requires removal of the name of any protected person from published copies (s 85(4)). The Magistrates’ Court or Children’s Court may exceptionally permit publication if satisfied it is in the public interest and just (s 86). Practitioners must check whether a restraint order intersects with intervention order matters before assuming publication is permissible.
Registrar and court distribution obligations (s 48). Copies of orders must be distributed by court officers to other courts and tribunals. This cross‑notification can have systemic effects: a restraint order made in one jurisdiction will be circulated widely, creating immediate cross‑jurisdictional awareness and potentially preventing forum‑shopping.
No criminal sanctions; remedies are procedural (Parts 2-9). The Act’s penalties are civil and procedural (stays, nullity, cost orders, refusals). Do not expect fines or imprisonment; enforcement relies on court process.
Transitional conversion of older orders (Part 12). Older vexatious‑litigant orders are taken to be orders under this Act and retain their terms unless varied or revoked (see ss 91-99). Practitioners must review historical orders carefully; an older “vexatious litigant” declaration may still be in force as an equivalent order under the new Act.
Court discretion is broad (see ss 11(2), 17(2), 29(2)). The Act repeatedly states courts “may take into account any matter it considers relevant”, meaning outcomes are substantially fact‑driven and discretionary. Litigants should prepare focused factual matrices showing frequency, pattern and reasons why conduct is or is not vexatious.
Appeal rights are limited and require leave (s 79). Appeals from many decisions under the Act require leave of the Supreme Court and are only on questions of law. This heightens the importance of making robust high‑quality submissions at first instance.
Finally, the Attorney‑General’s information power (s 43) means the executive may request and receive court documents when deciding whether to bring an application. This interaction between the executive and courts may surprise practitioners who do not expect the Attorney‑General to become involved in apparently private disputes.
How to comply
If advising a client who either seeks a restraint order, is the target of one, or is a third party likely to be affected, the Act prescribes concrete steps and evidence. The following notes are procedural, grounded in the Act’s provisions.
For applicants seeking a limited or extended litigation restraint order
Confirm eligibility and jurisdiction. Under ss 10(1) and 16(1), applicants can be the Attorney‑General, the person against whom vexatious proceedings were commenced, or a person with a sufficient interest. If the applicant is not the Attorney‑General and is not the immediate target, obtain leave to apply from the court or tribunal hearing the proceeding (ss 10(2), 16(2)). Prepare a concise leave application showing merit and that the application itself would not be an abuse of process (see s 10(3), s 16(3)).
Assemble documentary evidence. Provide copies of relevant interlocutory applications and proceedings, including orders from other Australian courts or tribunals that show repeated vexatious conduct (ss 11(2)(a), 17(2)(a), 29(2)(a)). If relying on prior orders, include certified copies and timelines demonstrating frequency or pattern.
Draft a clear proposed order and reasons. The Act permits orders on various terms (see ss 12, 20-24 for content). Be explicit about the persons or matters to be protected and the duration sought; where intervention order legislation is involved, follow the notice requirements in s 44.
For persons subject to a litigation restraint order
Apply promptly for leave to proceed where necessary. Under Parts 8, a restrained person must apply for leave: limited order leave under ss 50-51; extended order leave under ss 52-53; general order leave under ss 54-55. Make the application to the court that made the order unless the order provides otherwise (s 52(3)-(4), s 54(2)). Ensure the application is accompanied by the disclosures required by s 56.
Comply with the disclosure requirements (s 56). Prepare an affidavit setting out all prior leave applications, prior proceedings declared vexatious or stayed/dismissed for want of merit, and an explanation of how the new matter is materially different. Full disclosure is mandatory and may be determinative.
Anticipate conditions. If leave is granted, the court may impose conditions (s 64). Be ready to propose reasonable conditions acceptable to the court, including security for costs where appropriate.
For parties defending or responding to an application for a restraint order
Seek directions on notice. If you are an affected person, apply promptly for a direction under ss 60-61 or 67-68 to be given notice and an opportunity to be heard. The court may limit oral hearings; prepare strong written submissions (ss 62-63).
Use the registrar’s refusal power where appropriate. If the restrained person files a leave application that appears materially the same as prior ones, consider applying to the registrar under s 57 to refuse filing, or ask the court to exercise its supervisory power.
Administrative and publishing compliance
Ensure copies of orders are provided to the Attorney‑General and to other courts as required by ss 47-49 and 72-73. Administrative officers (Prothonotary, registrars, principal registrars) have specific duties to circulate orders; ensure the correct recipients are on file.
Where an order relates to intervention order legislation, follow privacy protections on publication (s 85(4), s 86). If you are the issuing court, include an express direction on publication or non‑publication; if you represent a protected person, apply for non‑publication where necessary.
Variation or revocation applications
Seek leave where required. A person subject to a restraint order must apply with leave to the court that made the order (s 65). The applicant must not give notice unless the court orders (s 66). Prepare evidence demonstrating a material change of circumstances and address any earlier non‑compliance.
Appeals
Obtain leave for appeals where required. Part 10 requires leave of the Supreme Court for appeals on questions of law in specified decisions (s 79). Follow the notice directions in ss 80-84 and prepare targeted legal submissions on points of law rather than re‑litigation of facts.
Practical drafting tips
Always certify correspondence and filings with a clear chronology of prior litigation and rulings; the Act’s inquiry is pattern‑based (ss 11(2), 17(2), 29(2)).
Use plain factual matrices to show why a proposed application or proceeding is materially different from prior conduct (s 56(1)(d)).
Where an application might impact children or victims under intervention order laws, include sensitivity to privacy and any statutory constraints on naming protected persons (s 85(4), s 86).
Anticipate security for costs and costs orders. Include evidence of capacity to comply and suggest reasonable security proposals where appropriate (s 64 example; s 35(3)(e) allows costs in acting in concert cases).
Monitor court rules and subordinate instruments. The Act contemplates rules of court (s 88) and regulations (s 89) that can materially affect procedure; check current rules for filing processes, timelines and forms.
In practice, compliance is about meticulous disclosure, jurisdictional precision, and anticipating the court’s discretion. The Act centralises the evidentiary focus on frequency, lack of merit, and pattern; ensure submissions and affidavits foreground those elements and align with the statutory tests in ss 11(1), 17(1), 29(1) and the leave provisions in Part 8.
28 Application for general litigation restraint order 25
29 Supreme Court may make general litigation restraint order 25
30 General litigation restraint order 26
31 Supreme Court may make extended litigation restraint order instead of general litigation restraint order 27
32 Effect of general litigation restraint order on proceeding 27
33 Duration of general litigation restraint order 27
Part 5—Acting in concert orders 29
34 Application for acting in concert order 29
35 Court or VCAT may make acting in concert order 29
36 Magistrates' Court or Children's Court may make acting in concert order—intervention order legislation 31
Part 6—Appeal restriction orders 33
37 Supreme Court may make an appeal restriction order 33
38 Court or VCAT may make appeal restriction order 33
39 Magistrates' Court or Children's Court may make appeal restriction order—intervention order legislation 34
40 Effect of appeal restriction order 35
41 Appeal restriction order does not affect other applications or proceedings 35
42 Duration of appeal restriction order 36
Part 7—General matters relating to orders 37
Division 1—Applications for orders 37
43 Attorney-General may request documents from Victorian court or tribunal 37
44 Notice of application for order—intervention order legislation 37
Division 2—Making of orders 37
45 Certain persons must be given opportunity to be heard 37
46 Statement of reasons for order—intervention order legislation 38
Division 3—Copies of orders 38
47 Copy of order to be given to Attorney-General 38
48 Copy of order to be given to other Victorian courts and tribunals 39
49 Copy of order—intervention order legislation 40
Part 8—Applications for leave to proceed 41
Division 1—Application for leave to proceed under limited litigation restraint order 41
50 Application for leave to make or continue interlocutory application 41
51 Court or VCAT may grant leave to make or continue interlocutory application 41
Division 2—Application for leave to proceed under extended litigation restraint order 42
52 Application for leave to commence or continue proceeding 42
53 Court or VCAT may grant leave to commence or continue proceeding 43
Division 3—Application for leave to proceed under general litigation restraint order 43
54 Application for leave to commence or continue proceeding 43
55 Victorian court or tribunal may grant leave to commence or continue proceeding 43
Division 4—General matters relating to applications for leave to proceed 44
56 Person must disclose certain matters 44
57 Refusal to accept application for leave to proceed 45
58 Victorian court or tribunal may dismiss application for leave to proceed 46
59 No notice of application to be given without direction or order 46
60 Direction as to giving notice of application 46
61 Direction as to giving notice of application—intervention order legislation 47
62 Victorian court or tribunal may give persons opportunity to be heard 48
63 Determining application for leave to proceed 48
64 Leave may be subject to conditions 49
Part 9—Variation or revocation of litigation restraint order 50
Division 1—Court or VCAT may vary or revoke order 50
65 Application for variation or revocation of litigation restraint order 50
66 No notice of application to be given without direction or order 50
67 Direction as to notice of application 51
68 Direction as to notice of application—intervention order legislation 52
69 Court or VCAT may vary or revoke litigation restraint order 53
70 Court or VCAT may give persons opportunity to be heard 53
71 Determining application for variation or revocation 53
72 Notice of order to be given to Attorney-General 54
73 Notice of order to be given to Victorian courts and tribunals 54
Division 2—Variation or revocation application prevention orders 56
74 Court or VCAT may make variation or revocation application prevention order 56
75 Effect of variation or revocation application prevention order 57
76 Order does not affect other applications or proceedings 57
77 Duration of order 57
Part 10—Appeals 59
78 Application of this Part 59
79 Appeal of decisions to which this Part applies 59
80 No notice of application to be given without direction or order 59
81 Direction as to giving notice of application 60
82 Direction as to giving notice of application—intervention order legislation 62
83 Court may give persons opportunity to be heard 64
84 Determining application for leave to appeal 64
Part 11—Miscellaneous provisions 65
85 Attorney-General to publish copy of order 65
86 Publication of names—intervention order legislation 65
87 Annual reports 66
88 Rules of Court 66
89 Regulations 67
Part 12—Transitional provisions 69
90 Application of Interpretation of Legislation Act 1984 69
91 Supreme Court Act 1986—orders declaring person to be vexatious litigant 69
92 Supreme Court Act 1986—applications not heard or determined before repeal of section 21 69
93 Supreme Court Act 1986—applications not determined before repeal of section 21 70
94 Family Violence Protection Act 2008—orders declaring person to be vexatious litigant 70
95 Family Violence Protection Act 2008—applications not heard and determined before repeal of Part 11 71
96 Family Violence Protection Act 2008—applications not determined before repeal of Part 11 73
97 Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010—orders declaring person to be vexatious litigant 76
98 Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010—Applications not heard and determined before repeal of Part 10 77
99 Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010—applications not determined before repeal of Part 10 79
101 Power to resolve transitional difficulties in proceeding 83
═══════════════
Endnotes 84
1 General information 84
2 Table of Amendments 86
3 Amendments Not in Operation 87
4 Explanatory details 88
Version No.011
Vexatious Proceedings Act 2014
No. 42 of 2014
Version incorporating amendments as at
30 August 2017
The Parliament of Victoria enacts:
Part 1—Preliminary
1 Purpose
The main purpose of this Act is to reform and consolidate the law relating to vexatious proceedings in courts and tribunals in a way that—
(a) balances individual rights of access to the courts with the public interest in an efficient and effective justice system; and
(b) promotes uniformity with other jurisdictions in the management and prevention of vexatious behaviour.
2 Commencement
(1) Subject to subsection (2), this Act comes into operation on a day or days to be proclaimed.
(2) If a provision of this Act does not come into operation before 31 October 2014, it comes into operation on that day.
3 Definitions
In this Act—
acting in concert has the meaning given by section 4;
acting in concert order means an order made—
(a) by the Supreme Court, the County Court, the Magistrates' Court or VCAT under section 35; or
(b) in relation to intervention order legislation, by the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court under section 36;
appeal restriction order means an order made—
(a) by the Supreme Court under section 37; or
(b) by the County Court, the Magistrates' Court or VCAT under section 38; or
(c) in relation to intervention order legislation, by the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court under section 39;
application for leave to proceed means—
(a) an application under section 50 by a person subject to a limited litigation restraint order for leave to make or continue an interlocutory application in a proceeding; or
(b) an application under section 52 by a person subject to an extended litigation restraint order for leave to commence or continue a proceeding; or
(c) an application under section 54 by a person subject to a general litigation restraint order for leave to commence or continue a proceeding;
Australian court or tribunal means—
(a) a Victorian court or tribunal; or
(b) a court or tribunal of the Commonwealth or of another State or a Territory;
child means a person who is under the age of 18 years;
Court means the following courts—
(a) the Supreme Court;
(b) the County Court;
(c) the Magistrates' Court;
(d) in relation to an order under this Act that relates to intervention order legislation, the Children's Court;
extended litigation restraint order means an order made—
(a) by the Supreme Court, the County Court, the Magistrates' Court or VCAT under section 17; or
(b) in relation to intervention order legislation, by the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court under section 19;
general litigation restraint order means an order made under section 29;
interlocutory application has the meaning given by section 5;
intervention order legislation means—
(a) the Crimes (Family Violence) Act 1987 as in force immediately before its repeal; and
(b) the Family Violence Protection Act 2008; and
(c) the Personal Safety Intervention Orders Act 2010; and
(d) the Stalking Intervention Orders Act 2008 as in force immediately before its repeal;
S. 3 def. of legal practitioner amended by No. 38/2017 s. 95(1).
legal practitioner means an Australian legal practitioner;
limited litigation restraint order means an order made under section 11;
litigation restraint order means any of the following orders—
(a) an extended litigation restraint order;
(b) a general litigation restraint order;
(c) a limited litigation restraint order;
parent, of a child, includes—
(a) a person who has responsibility for the long-term welfare of the child and has, in relation to the child, all the parental powers, rights and duties that are vested by law or custom in the guardian of a child; and
(b) a person with whom the child normally or regularly resides;
proceeding means any matter in an Australian court or tribunal, whether civil or criminal, including—
(a) any cause, matter, action, suit, proceeding, trial, complaint or inquiry of any kind within the jurisdiction of an Australian court or tribunal;
(b) any proceeding (including any interlocutory application) taken in connection with or incidental to a proceeding before an Australian court or tribunal;
(c) any appeal, review or other challenge, including an application for judicial review or an application for leave to appeal.
variation or revocation application prevention order means an order made—
(a) by the Supreme Court, the County Court, the Magistrates' Court or VCAT under section 74(1); or
(b) in relation to intervention order legislation, by the Magistrates' Court or the Children's Court under section 74(2);
vexatious application includes the following—
(a) an interlocutory application that is an abuse of the process of a court or tribunal;
(b) an interlocutory application made to harass or annoy, to cause delay or detriment, or for another wrongful purpose;
(c) an interlocutory application made or pursued without reasonable ground;
(d) an interlocutory application pursued in a way so as to harass or annoy, cause delay or detriment, or achieve another wrongful purpose;
vexatious proceeding includes the following—
(a) a proceeding that is an abuse of the process of a court or tribunal;
(b) a proceeding commenced to harass or annoy, to cause delay or detriment, or for another wrongful purpose;
(c) a proceeding commenced or pursued without reasonable grounds;
(d) a proceeding conducted in a way so as to harass or annoy, cause delay or detriment, or achieve another wrongful purpose;
vexatious proceeding order means any of the following orders made by an Australian court or tribunal—
(a) an order that a proceeding be stayed or dismissed for being vexatious;
(b) an order that a person commencing or conducting a proceeding is a vexatious litigant;
(c) any other order that requires the person subject to the order to seek leave of an Australian court or tribunal before commencing or continuing a proceeding;
Victorian court or tribunal means any of the following—
(a) the Supreme Court;
(b) the County Court;
(c) the Magistrates' Court;
(d) the Children's Court;
(e) VCAT;
(f) VOCAT;
VOCAT means the Victims of Crime Assistance Tribunal established by the Victims of Crime Assistance Act 1996.
4 Meaning of *acting in concert*
(1) Subject to subsection (2), in this Act, a person is acting in concert with another person if the first mentioned person is—
(a) acting on behalf of the other person; or
(b) acting for the predominant benefit of the other person; or
(c) acting on the instructions of the other person; or
(d) acting in collusion with the other person.
(2) A person who makes an interlocutory application or commences and conducts a proceeding on behalf of a person is not acting in concert with that person if the first mentioned person is—
(a) a legal practitioner acting for the person; or
(b) a litigation guardian of the person; or
(c) a professional advocate within the meaning of section 62(8) of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998; or
(d) any other person authorised or required by law to act on behalf of the person.
Example
Persons who may be authorised or required by law to act on behalf of a person include insurers conducting proceedings under a right of subrogation, administrators, guardians, liquidators, receivers and any other person who has a legal right or obligation to represent the person.
5 Meaning of *interlocutory application*
(1) In this Act, an interlocutory application means any process by which an interlocutory proceeding is commenced in an Australian court or tribunal, including a subpoena.
(2) Despite subsection (1), the following are not interlocutory applications for the purposes of this Act—
(a) an application under the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 in respect of which a court makes—
(i) an interim order under section 53 or 101 of that Act; or
(ii) an interim extensi
This is an opening excerpt, not the complete document.