This Act sets out how jurors are summoned, selected, excused, paid and managed in Queensland, assigning the sheriff primary administrative responsibility and judges authority over selection and trial conduct. It prescribes jury sizes and verdict rules, confidentiality protections and criminal penalties for non‑compliance. It chiefly affects prospective jurors, employers, litigants (who may pay fees for civil juries) and court administrators — shaping who must attend, what compensation is available, and how procedural discretion and secrecy protect trial integrity.
The Jury Act 1995 comprehensively regulates the constitution, selection, management and protection of juries in Queensland’s Supreme, District and Childrens Courts. At its core the statute imposes a civic obligation on qualified electors to serve as jurors (s 5), defines the pool from which they are drawn, and then prescribes every procedural step from the maintenance of jury rolls through to post-verdict confidentiality.
Part 2 establishes the threshold criteria: a person is qualified if enrolled on the electoral roll, resident within the relevant jury district and not disqualified under the long list in s 4(3). That list excludes the Governor, parliamentarians, local councillors, current and former judges and magistrates, practising lawyers, police officers, corrective services and detention centre staff, persons over 70 who have not elected to remain eligible, those unable to read or write English, persons with disqualifying physical or mental disabilities, and anyone convicted of an indictable offence or sentenced to imprisonment anywhere. The Act therefore performs a gate-keeping function that balances representativeness against impartiality and practical capacity.
Parts 3 and 4 deal with infrastructure and assembly. The sheriff must maintain a jury roll for each district (s 9), drawing names from electoral data (s 10) and excluding known ineligible persons after reasonable inquiry (s 10(2)). Electoral and police authorities are obliged to supply information, with the Criminal Law (Rehabilitation of Offenders) Act 1986 expressly disapplied for these purposes (s 12(4)). Lists of prospective jurors are generated randomly by computer or by lot (s 16), notices are sent requiring completion of a questionnaire and excusal application (s 18), and the list is revised before summonses issue (ss 24–26). The Senior Judge Administrator issues practice directions governing frequency of lists, excusal criteria and information to be given to jurors (s 13).
Current sections
Direct links to the current provisions in Jury Act 1995.
112
pt.1
Preliminary
Preliminary
sec.1
Short title
sec.1 Short title
This Act may be cited as the Jury Act 1995 .
sec.2
Commencement
sec.2 Commencement
This Act commences on a day to be fixed by proclamation.
sec.3
Definitions—the dictionary
sec.3 Definitions—the dictionary
The dictionary in schedule 3 defines particular words used in this Act.
pt.2
Citizen’s obligation to perform jury service
Citizen’s obligation to perform jury service
sec.4
Qualification to serve as juror
sec.4 Qualification to serve as juror
A person is qualified to serve as a juror at a trial within a jury district ( qualified for jury service ) if—
the person is enrolled as an elector; and
the person’s address as shown on the electoral roll is within the jury district; and
the person is eligible for jury service.
A person who is enrolled as an elector is eligible for jury service unless the person is mentioned in subsection (3) .
The following persons are not eligible for jury service—
the Governor;
a member of Parliament;
a local government mayor or other councillor;
a person who is or has been a judge or magistrate (in the State or elsewhere);
a person who is or has been a presiding member of the Land and Resources Tribunal;
a lawyer actually engaged in legal work;
a person who is or has been a police officer (in the State or elsewhere);
a detention centre employee;
a corrective services officer;
a person who is 70 years or more, if the person has not elected to be eligible for jury service under subsection (4) ;
a person who is not able to read or write the English language;
a person who has a physical or mental disability that makes the person incapable of effectively performing the functions of a juror;
a person who has been convicted of an indictable offence, whether on indictment or in a summary proceeding;
a person who has been sentenced (in the State or elsewhere) to imprisonment.
A person who is 70 years or more may elect to be eligible for jury service in the way prescribed under a regulation.
s 4 amd 1996 No. 80 s 3 ; 2000 No. 63 s 276 sch 2 ; 2002 No. 34 s 27 ; 2002 No. 39 s 154 ; 2004 No. 43 s 3 sch
(sec.4-ssec.1) A person is qualified to serve as a juror at a trial within a jury district ( qualified for jury service ) if— the person is enrolled as an elector; and the person’s address as shown on the electoral roll is within the jury district; and the person is eligible for jury service.
(sec.4-ssec.2) A person who is enrolled as an elector is eligible for jury service unless the person is mentioned in subsection (3) .
(sec.4-ssec.3) The following persons are not eligible for jury service— the Governor; a member of Parliament; a local government mayor or other councillor; a person who is or has been a judge or magistrate (in the State or elsewhere); a person who is or has been a presiding member of the Land and Resources Tribunal; a lawyer actually engaged in legal work; a person who is or has been a police officer (in the State or elsewhere); a detention centre employee; a corrective services officer; a person who is 70 years or more, if the person has not elected to be eligible for jury service under subsection (4) ; a person who is not able to read or write the English language; a person who has a physical or mental disability that makes the person incapable of effectively performing the functions of a juror; a person who has been convicted of an indictable offence, whether on indictment or in a summary proceeding; a person who has been sentenced (in the State or elsewhere) to imprisonment.
(sec.4-ssec.4) A person who is 70 years or more may elect to be eligible for jury service in the way prescribed under a regulation.
(a) the person is enrolled as an elector; and
(b) the person’s address as shown on the electoral roll is within the jury district; and
(c) the person is eligible for jury service.
(a) the Governor;
(b) a member of Parliament;
(c) a local government mayor or other councillor;
(d) a person who is or has been a judge or magistrate (in the State or elsewhere);
(e) a person who is or has been a presiding member of the Land and Resources Tribunal;
(f) a lawyer actually engaged in legal work;
(g) a person who is or has been a police officer (in the State or elsewhere);
(h) a detention centre employee;
(i) a corrective services officer;
(j) a person who is 70 years or more, if the person has not elected to be eligible for jury service under subsection (4) ;
(k) a person who is not able to read or write the English language;
(l) a person who has a physical or mental disability that makes the person incapable of effectively performing the functions of a juror;
(m) a person who has been convicted of an indictable offence, whether on indictment or in a summary proceeding;
(n) a person who has been sentenced (in the State or elsewhere) to imprisonment.
sec.5
Obligation to perform jury service
sec.5 Obligation to perform jury service
A person who is qualified for jury service is liable to perform jury service unless the person is excused from jury service by a judge or the sheriff.
For power to excuse from jury service, see sections 19 to 23 .
sec.6
Verdict not to be questioned on ground of qualification of juror
sec.6 Verdict not to be questioned on ground of qualification of juror
The fact that a person who is not qualified for jury service serves on a jury is not a ground for questioning the verdict.
pt.3
Jury districts and jury rolls
Jury districts and jury rolls
pt.3-div.1
Jury districts
Jury districts
sec.7
Jury districts—establishment and boundaries
sec.7 Jury districts—establishment and boundaries
A jury district may be established or abolished under a regulation.
The boundaries of a jury district are as defined under a regulation.
(sec.7-ssec.1) A jury district may be established or abolished under a regulation.
(sec.7-ssec.2) The boundaries of a jury district are as defined under a regulation.
sec.8
Assignment of responsibility for jury districts to other sheriffs and persons
sec.8 Assignment of responsibility for jury districts to other sheriffs and persons
Responsibility for carrying out the sheriff of Queensland’s functions under this Act for a particular jury district may be assigned under a regulation to—
a deputy sheriff; or
another officer or person specified under a regulation.
The deputy sheriffs are appointed under the Supreme Court of Queensland Act 1991 .
However, despite an assignment of responsibility under this section, the sheriff of Queensland—
remains responsible for keeping jury rolls and preparing lists of prospective jurors for all jury districts; and
may, by agreement with the person to whom responsibility for a particular jury district has been assigned, issue notices and summonses to prospective jurors for the jury district.
See sections 18 (Notice to prospective jurors) and 27 (Summons for jury service).
s 8 amd 2011 No. 45 s 150
(sec.8-ssec.1) Responsibility for carrying out the sheriff of Queensland’s functions under this Act for a particular jury district may be assigned under a regulation to— a deputy sheriff; or another officer or person specified under a regulation. The deputy sheriffs are appointed under the Supreme Court of Queensland Act 1991 .
(sec.8-ssec.2) However, despite an assignment of responsibility under this section, the sheriff of Queensland— remains responsible for keeping jury rolls and preparing lists of prospective jurors for all jury districts; and may, by agreement with the person to whom responsibility for a particular jury district has been assigned, issue notices and summonses to prospective jurors for the jury district. See sections 18 (Notice to prospective jurors) and 27 (Summons for jury service).
(a) a deputy sheriff; or
(b) another officer or person specified under a regulation. Editor’s note— The deputy sheriffs are appointed under the Supreme Court of Queensland Act 1991 .
(a) remains responsible for keeping jury rolls and preparing lists of prospective jurors for all jury districts; and
(b) may, by agreement with the person to whom responsibility for a particular jury district has been assigned, issue notices and summonses to prospective jurors for the jury district. Editor’s note— See sections 18 (Notice to prospective jurors) and 27 (Summons for jury service).
pt.3-div.2
Jury rolls
Jury rolls
sec.9
Keeping of jury rolls
sec.9 Keeping of jury rolls
The sheriff of Queensland must keep a jury roll for each jury district.
A jury roll may be kept in any way, including, for example, by computer.
(sec.9-ssec.1) The sheriff of Queensland must keep a jury roll for each jury district.
(sec.9-ssec.2) A jury roll may be kept in any way, including, for example, by computer.
sec.10
Jury roll for a jury district
sec.10 Jury roll for a jury district
The jury roll for a particular jury district must consist of a list of the names, addresses and occupations of electors whose addresses, as recorded in an electoral roll, are within the jury district.
However, the sheriff of Queensland must exclude from the jury roll the names of persons who are, to the sheriff’s knowledge, not qualified for jury service.
The sheriff of Queensland may make reasonable inquiries to find out which persons enrolled as electors for addresses in a particular jury district should be excluded from the jury roll.
(sec.10-ssec.1) The jury roll for a particular jury district must consist of a list of the names, addresses and occupations of electors whose addresses, as recorded in an electoral roll, are within the jury district.
(sec.10-ssec.2) However, the sheriff of Queensland must exclude from the jury roll the names of persons who are, to the sheriff’s knowledge, not qualified for jury service.
(sec.10-ssec.3) The sheriff of Queensland may make reasonable inquiries to find out which persons enrolled as electors for addresses in a particular jury district should be excluded from the jury roll.
sec.11
Electoral commission to give information
sec.11 Electoral commission to give information
If asked by the sheriff of Queensland, the electoral commission must—
give the sheriff information reasonably required for keeping a jury roll; and
allow the sheriff access to any information the commission has relevant to the keeping of jury rolls.
(a) give the sheriff information reasonably required for keeping a jury roll; and
(b) allow the sheriff access to any information the commission has relevant to the keeping of jury rolls.
sec.12
Arrangements with commissioner of the police service
sec.12 Arrangements with commissioner of the police service
For keeping a jury roll, the sheriff or the electoral commission may arrange with the commissioner of the police service for the police service to—
make inquiries reasonably required for keeping a jury roll; or
give other reasonable help relevant to keeping a jury roll.
The sheriff or the electoral commission must give a police officer helping under the arrangement any information the sheriff or commission has that may help the officer conduct the inquiries.
Subsection (1) does not limit the help the sheriff or the electoral commission may require.
The Criminal Law (Rehabilitation of Offenders) Act 1986 does not apply to the disclosure of information for inquiries, or to the sheriff or the electoral commission, under this section.
s 12 amd 1996 No. 80 s 4
sub 2000 No. 5 s 373 sch 2
amd 2000 No. 5 s 461 sch 3 (amd 2000 No. 22 s 28 (5) ); 2002 No. 23 s 51
(sec.12-ssec.1) For keeping a jury roll, the sheriff or the electoral commission may arrange with the commissioner of the police service for the police service to— make inquiries reasonably required for keeping a jury roll; or give other reasonable help relevant to keeping a jury roll.
(sec.12-ssec.2) The sheriff or the electoral commission must give a police officer helping under the arrangement any information the sheriff or commission has that may help the officer conduct the inquiries.
(sec.12-ssec.3) Subsection (1) does not limit the help the sheriff or the electoral commission may require.
(sec.12-ssec.4) The Criminal Law (Rehabilitation of Offenders) Act 1986 does not apply to the disclosure of information for inquiries, or to the sheriff or the electoral commission, under this section.
(a) make inquiries reasonably required for keeping a jury roll; or
(b) give other reasonable help relevant to keeping a jury roll.
pt.4
Assembly of jurors
Assembly of jurors
pt.4-div.1
General powers of Senior Judge Administrator
General powers of Senior Judge Administrator
sec.13
Practice directions
sec.13 Practice directions
After consulting with the Chief Judge of the District Court and the President of the Childrens Court, the Senior Judge Administrator may issue directions under the Supreme Court of Queensland Act 1991 about—
The Supreme Court of Queensland Act 1991 , section 51 , deals with the responsibility of the Senior Judge Administrator for the administration of the Supreme Court in the Trial Division. The section empowers the Senior Judge Administrator, among other things, to issue directions about the practices and procedures of the Supreme Court in the Trial Division (s 51(2)).
the preparation of lists of prospective jurors for each jury district and, in particular, how often a fresh list is to be prepared for each jury district; and
summoning and assembling prospective jurors for jury service; and
forming panels of prospective jurors from the available persons who have been summoned for jury service in a jury district so juries may be selected for civil and criminal trials that are to begin in the jury district; and
the criteria for excusing from jury service and the circumstances in which a person may be excused permanently from jury service; and
jury members being informed of the names of the parties and any witnesses to be called.
s 13 amd 2002 No. 34 s 28 ; 2002 No. 39 s 155
(a) the preparation of lists of prospective jurors for each jury district and, in particular, how often a fresh list is to be prepared for each jury district; and
(b) summoning and assembling prospective jurors for jury service; and
(c) forming panels of prospective jurors from the available persons who have been summoned for jury service in a jury district so juries may be selected for civil and criminal trials that are to begin in the jury district; and
(d) the criteria for excusing from jury service and the circumstances in which a person may be excused permanently from jury service; and
(e) jury members being informed of the names of the parties and any witnesses to be called.
sec.14
Administrative directions
sec.14 Administrative directions
After consulting with the Chief Judge of the District Court, the Senior Judge Administrator may give administrative directions for the proper and efficient administration of this Act to sheriffs and other persons engaged in the administration of this Act.
s 14 amd 2002 No. 34 s 29
pt.4-div.2
Preparation of lists of prospective jurors
Preparation of lists of prospective jurors
sec.15
Lists of prospective jurors
sec.15 Lists of prospective jurors
The sheriff of Queensland must prepare lists of prospective jurors for each jury district.
The sheriff of Queensland may decide how often a list of prospective jurors is to be prepared for each jury district and the number of persons to be included in each list according to the sheriff’s estimate of the likely need for jurors in the jury district.
However—
the sheriff of Queensland must comply with requirements under the practice directions about how often fresh lists of prospective jurors are to be prepared for each jury district; and
subject to the practice directions, the sheriff of Queensland must comply with the request of another sheriff—
for the preparation of lists of prospective jurors for the jury district for which the other sheriff is responsible; and
about the number of prospective jurors to be included in each list.
(sec.15-ssec.1) The sheriff of Queensland must prepare lists of prospective jurors for each jury district.
(sec.15-ssec.2) The sheriff of Queensland may decide how often a list of prospective jurors is to be prepared for each jury district and the number of persons to be included in each list according to the sheriff’s estimate of the likely need for jurors in the jury district.
(sec.15-ssec.3) However— the sheriff of Queensland must comply with requirements under the practice directions about how often fresh lists of prospective jurors are to be prepared for each jury district; and subject to the practice directions, the sheriff of Queensland must comply with the request of another sheriff— for the preparation of lists of prospective jurors for the jury district for which the other sheriff is responsible; and about the number of prospective jurors to be included in each list.
(a) the sheriff of Queensland must comply with requirements under the practice directions about how often fresh lists of prospective jurors are to be prepared for each jury district; and
(b) subject to the practice directions, the sheriff of Queensland must comply with the request of another sheriff— (i) for the preparation of lists of prospective jurors for the jury district for which the other sheriff is responsible; and (ii) about the number of prospective jurors to be included in each list.
(i) for the preparation of lists of prospective jurors for the jury district for which the other sheriff is responsible; and
(ii) about the number of prospective jurors to be included in each list.
(i) for the preparation of lists of prospective jurors for the jury district for which the other sheriff is responsible; and
(ii) about the number of prospective jurors to be included in each list.
sec.16
Selection of persons to be included in list of prospective jurors
sec.16 Selection of persons to be included in list of prospective jurors
The names of persons to be included in the list of prospective jurors are to be drawn from the jury roll for the relevant jury district.
The selection must be made—
by a computer programmed to make a random selection of names from the jury roll; or
by random selection of cards bearing the names of, or numbers representing, the persons whose names are on the jury roll.
(sec.16-ssec.1) The names of persons to be included in the list of prospective jurors are to be drawn from the jury roll for the relevant jury district.
(sec.16-ssec.2) The selection must be made— by a computer programmed to make a random selection of names from the jury roll; or by random selection of cards bearing the names of, or numbers representing, the persons whose names are on the jury roll.
(a) by a computer programmed to make a random selection of names from the jury roll; or
(b) by random selection of cards bearing the names of, or numbers representing, the persons whose names are on the jury roll.
sec.17
Copies of list must be given to other sheriffs
sec.17 Copies of list must be given to other sheriffs
When the sheriff of Queensland prepares a list of prospective jurors for a jury district for which another sheriff is responsible, the sheriff of Queensland must give a copy of the list to the other sheriff.
pt.4-div.3
Notice to prospective jurors
Notice to prospective jurors
sec.18
Notice to prospective jurors
sec.18 Notice to prospective jurors
The sheriff must give each prospective juror a written notice (a notice to prospective jurors ) stating—
the person may be summoned for jury service; and
the jury service period for which the person may be summoned.
Without limiting the ways the notice to prospective jurors may be given, the notice may be given by email or other electronic means.
The notice to prospective jurors must—
include or be accompanied by, or give instructions for accessing, the following documents—
a questionnaire (a prospective juror questionnaire ) to find out whether the person is qualified to serve as a juror and, if the person claims not to be qualified to serve as a juror, the ground of the claim;
a form (an application form ) to enable the person to apply to be excused from jury service; and
state the ways the completed documents may be returned to the sheriff.
A person to whom the notice is given must not fail to return the completed prospective juror questionnaire to the sheriff within the reasonable time allowed in the notice, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.
Maximum penalty—10 penalty units or 2 months imprisonment.
If the person wants to be excused from jury service, the person must return the completed application form to the sheriff.
Unless permitted by the practice directions, the sheriff may excuse a person from jury service only on an application form that states the reasons for asking to be excused from jury service.
A person must not state something the person knows is false in response to a prospective juror questionnaire, or in an application to be excused from jury service.
Maximum penalty for subsection (7) —10 penalty units or 2 months imprisonment.
s 18 amd 2017 No. 6 s 46
(sec.18-ssec.1) The sheriff must give each prospective juror a written notice (a notice to prospective jurors ) stating— the person may be summoned for jury service; and the jury service period for which the person may be summoned.
(sec.18-ssec.2) Without limiting the ways the notice to prospective jurors may be given, the notice may be given by email or other electronic means.
(sec.18-ssec.3) The notice to prospective jurors must— include or be accompanied by, or give instructions for accessing, the following documents— a questionnaire (a prospective juror questionnaire ) to find out whether the person is qualified to serve as a juror and, if the person claims not to be qualified to serve as a juror, the ground of the claim; a form (an application form ) to enable the person to apply to be excused from jury service; and state the ways the completed documents may be returned to the sheriff.
(sec.18-ssec.4) A person to whom the notice is given must not fail to return the completed prospective juror questionnaire to the sheriff within the reasonable time allowed in the notice, unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—10 penalty units or 2 months imprisonment.
(sec.18-ssec.5) If the person wants to be excused from jury service, the person must return the completed application form to the sheriff.
(sec.18-ssec.6) Unless permitted by the practice directions, the sheriff may excuse a person from jury service only on an application form that states the reasons for asking to be excused from jury service.
(sec.18-ssec.7) A person must not state something the person knows is false in response to a prospective juror questionnaire, or in an application to be excused from jury service. Maximum penalty for subsection (7) —10 penalty units or 2 months imprisonment.
(a) the person may be summoned for jury service; and
(b) the jury service period for which the person may be summoned.
(a) include or be accompanied by, or give instructions for accessing, the following documents— (i) a questionnaire (a prospective juror questionnaire ) to find out whether the person is qualified to serve as a juror and, if the person claims not to be qualified to serve as a juror, the ground of the claim; (ii) a form (an application form ) to enable the person to apply to be excused from jury service; and
(i) a questionnaire (a prospective juror questionnaire ) to find out whether the person is qualified to serve as a juror and, if the person claims not to be qualified to serve as a juror, the ground of the claim;
(ii) a form (an application form ) to enable the person to apply to be excused from jury service; and
(b) state the ways the completed documents may be returned to the sheriff.
(i) a questionnaire (a prospective juror questionnaire ) to find out whether the person is qualified to serve as a juror and, if the person claims not to be qualified to serve as a juror, the ground of the claim;
(ii) a form (an application form ) to enable the person to apply to be excused from jury service; and
pt.4-div.4
Power to excuse from jury service
Power to excuse from jury service
sec.19
Sheriff’s power to excuse from jury service
sec.19 Sheriff’s power to excuse from jury service
On an application to be excused from jury service, the sheriff may excuse the applicant from jury service—
for a particular jury service period (or part of a particular jury service period); or
permanently.
In exercising the power to excuse from jury service, the sheriff must comply with procedural requirements imposed under the practice directions.
(sec.19-ssec.1) On an application to be excused from jury service, the sheriff may excuse the applicant from jury service— for a particular jury service period (or part of a particular jury service period); or permanently.
(sec.19-ssec.2) In exercising the power to excuse from jury service, the sheriff must comply with procedural requirements imposed under the practice directions.
(a) for a particular jury service period (or part of a particular jury service period); or
(b) permanently.
sec.20
Power of judge to excuse from jury service
sec.20 Power of judge to excuse from jury service
A judge may excuse a person from jury service—
for a particular jury service period (or part of a particular jury service period); or
permanently.
A judge may exercise the power to excuse from jury service—
on the judge’s own initiative; or
on application by a member of a jury panel who wants to be excused from jury service.
A judge may hear an application under this section with or without formality.
If the judge’s decision on an application under this section is inconsistent with the sheriff’s decision on an earlier application made to the sheriff by the same applicant, the judge’s decision prevails.
s 20 amd 2002 No. 23 s 52
(sec.20-ssec.1) A judge may excuse a person from jury service— for a particular jury service period (or part of a particular jury service period); or permanently.
(sec.20-ssec.2) A judge may exercise the power to excuse from jury service— on the judge’s own initiative; or on application by a member of a jury panel who wants to be excused from jury service.
(sec.20-ssec.3) A judge may hear an application under this section with or without formality.
(sec.20-ssec.4) If the judge’s decision on an application under this section is inconsistent with the sheriff’s decision on an earlier application made to the sheriff by the same applicant, the judge’s decision prevails.
(a) for a particular jury service period (or part of a particular jury service period); or
(b) permanently.
(a) on the judge’s own initiative; or
(b) on application by a member of a jury panel who wants to be excused from jury service.
sec.21
Criteria to be applied in excusing from jury service
sec.21 Criteria to be applied in excusing from jury service
In deciding whether to excuse a person from jury service, the sheriff or judge must have regard to the following—
whether jury service would result in substantial hardship to the person because of the person’s employment or personal circumstances;
whether jury service would result in substantial financial hardship to the person;
whether the jury service would result in substantial inconvenience to the public or a section of the public;
whether others are dependent on the person to provide care in circumstances where suitable alternative care is not readily available;
the person’s state of health;
anything else stated in a practice direction.
A person may be permanently excused from jury service only if the person is eligible to be permanently excused from jury service in the circumstances stated in the practice directions.
(sec.21-ssec.1) In deciding whether to excuse a person from jury service, the sheriff or judge must have regard to the following— whether jury service would result in substantial hardship to the person because of the person’s employment or personal circumstances; whether jury service would result in substantial financial hardship to the person; whether the jury service would result in substantial inconvenience to the public or a section of the public; whether others are dependent on the person to provide care in circumstances where suitable alternative care is not readily available; the person’s state of health; anything else stated in a practice direction.
(sec.21-ssec.2) A person may be permanently excused from jury service only if the person is eligible to be permanently excused from jury service in the circumstances stated in the practice directions.
(a) whether jury service would result in substantial hardship to the person because of the person’s employment or personal circumstances;
(b) whether jury service would result in substantial financial hardship to the person;
(c) whether the jury service would result in substantial inconvenience to the public or a section of the public;
(d) whether others are dependent on the person to provide care in circumstances where suitable alternative care is not readily available;
(e) the person’s state of health;
(f) anything else stated in a practice direction.
sec.22
When prospective juror entitled to be excused from jury service
sec.22 When prospective juror entitled to be excused from jury service
This section applies to a prospective juror if the prospective juror—
has been summoned to perform jury service for a particular jury service period, or is on a list of prospective jurors who may be summoned to perform jury service for a particular jury service period; and
has earlier been summoned for jury service and has attended as required by the summons for a jury service period (or, if excused from jury service for part of a jury service period, the balance of the jury service period) ending less than 1 year before the jury service period mentioned in paragraph (a) .
The prospective juror is entitled to be excused from jury service for the jury service period.
(sec.22-ssec.1) This section applies to a prospective juror if the prospective juror— has been summoned to perform jury service for a particular jury service period, or is on a list of prospective jurors who may be summoned to perform jury service for a particular jury service period; and has earlier been summoned for jury service and has attended as required by the summons for a jury service period (or, if excused from jury service for part of a jury service period, the balance of the jury service period) ending less than 1 year before the jury service period mentioned in paragraph (a) .
(sec.22-ssec.2) The prospective juror is entitled to be excused from jury service for the jury service period.
(a) has been summoned to perform jury service for a particular jury service period, or is on a list of prospective jurors who may be summoned to perform jury service for a particular jury service period; and
(b) has earlier been summoned for jury service and has attended as required by the summons for a jury service period (or, if excused from jury service for part of a jury service period, the balance of the jury service period) ending less than 1 year before the jury service period mentioned in paragraph (a) .
sec.23
Time for exercising power to excuse
sec.23 Time for exercising power to excuse
A prospective juror may be excused from jury service before or after the prospective juror is summoned for jury service.
pt.4-div.5
Revision of list of prospective jurors
Revision of list of prospective jurors
sec.24
Revision of list
sec.24 Revision of list
After the end of the time allowed in the notices to prospective jurors for the return of prospective juror questionnaires, the sheriff must revise the list of prospective jurors.
The revision is made by noting on the list the exclusion from the list of the name of each person—
who, in the sheriff’s opinion—
can not be located within a reasonable time; or
is not qualified for jury service; or
who has been excused from jury service.
The sheriff may make reasonable inquiries to find out whether the name of a person on the list of prospective jurors should be excluded from the list because the person is not qualified for jury service.
(sec.24-ssec.1) After the end of the time allowed in the notices to prospective jurors for the return of prospective juror questionnaires, the sheriff must revise the list of prospective jurors.
(sec.24-ssec.2) The revision is made by noting on the list the exclusion from the list of the name of each person— who, in the sheriff’s opinion— can not be located within a reasonable time; or is not qualified for jury service; or who has been excused from jury service.
(sec.24-ssec.3) The sheriff may make reasonable inquiries to find out whether the name of a person on the list of prospective jurors should be excluded from the list because the person is not qualified for jury service.
(a) who, in the sheriff’s opinion— (i) can not be located within a reasonable time; or (ii) is not qualified for jury service; or
(i) can not be located within a reasonable time; or
(ii) is not qualified for jury service; or
(b) who has been excused from jury service.
(i) can not be located within a reasonable time; or
(ii) is not qualified for jury service; or
sec.25
Effect of revised list
sec.25 Effect of revised list
On revision of the list of prospective jurors, the list (the revised list of prospective jurors ) becomes the basis for issuing summonses for jury service in the relevant jury district for the jury service period concerned.
However, an unrevised list of prospective jurors may be used as the basis for issuing summonses for jury service, if the sheriff considers there is not enough time to allow the list to be revised before the summonses are issued.
A prospective juror selected from an unrevised list of prospective jurors may be summoned for jury service only if the notice to prospective jurors has been given to the prospective juror, or is given to the prospective juror together with the summons.
See section 18 (1) (Notice to prospective jurors).
(sec.25-ssec.1) On revision of the list of prospective jurors, the list (the revised list of prospective jurors ) becomes the basis for issuing summonses for jury service in the relevant jury district for the jury service period concerned.
(sec.25-ssec.2) However, an unrevised list of prospective jurors may be used as the basis for issuing summonses for jury service, if the sheriff considers there is not enough time to allow the list to be revised before the summonses are issued.
(sec.25-ssec.3) A prospective juror selected from an unrevised list of prospective jurors may be summoned for jury service only if the notice to prospective jurors has been given to the prospective juror, or is given to the prospective juror together with the summons. See section 18 (1) (Notice to prospective jurors).
pt.4-div.6
Summoning for jury service
Summoning for jury service
sec.26
Selection of persons for summons
sec.26 Selection of persons for summons
The sheriff must from time to time (as the sheriff considers necessary) select for summons enough prospective jurors to enable the selection of juries for trials starting in the relevant jury district in the jury service period concerned.
The persons to be summoned must be selected—
by a computer programmed to make a random selection of names from the revised list of prospective jurors; or
by random selection of cards bearing the names of, or numbers representing, the persons whose names are on the revised list of prospective jurors.
However, the selection may be made from the unrevised list of prospective jurors, if the sheriff considers there is not enough time to allow for the list to be revised before the summonses are issued.
See section 25 (2) (Effect of revised list).
(sec.26-ssec.1) The sheriff must from time to time (as the sheriff considers necessary) select for summons enough prospective jurors to enable the selection of juries for trials starting in the relevant jury district in the jury service period concerned.
(sec.26-ssec.2) The persons to be summoned must be selected— by a computer programmed to make a random selection of names from the revised list of prospective jurors; or by random selection of cards bearing the names of, or numbers representing, the persons whose names are on the revised list of prospective jurors.
(sec.26-ssec.3) However, the selection may be made from the unrevised list of prospective jurors, if the sheriff considers there is not enough time to allow for the list to be revised before the summonses are issued. See section 25 (2) (Effect of revised list).
(a) by a computer programmed to make a random selection of names from the revised list of prospective jurors; or
(b) by random selection of cards bearing the names of, or numbers representing, the persons whose names are on the revised list of prospective jurors.
sec.27
Summons for jury service
sec.27 Summons for jury service
The sheriff must give to each person selected for summoning a summons requiring the person—
to attend for jury service as instructed by the sheriff at places and times to be stated in the instructions; and
if selected as a member of a jury, to attend as instructed by the court until discharged by the court.
Without limiting the ways the summons may be given, the summons may be given by email or other electronic means.
A person summoned for jury service may only be instructed by the sheriff to attend for jury service at a time that falls within a period stated in the summons as the jury service period.
The sheriff must instruct a sufficient number of persons to attend for jury service on each day on which a trial or trials are to start in the jury district to enable the selection of juries for the trial or trials.
An instruction to attend for jury service may be given—
personally, whether directly or indirectly; or
by notice in a newspaper circulating generally in the jury district; or
by telephone, radio, television or other form of distance communication; or
in a way—
authorised under a regulation; or
agreed between the sheriff and the person to whom the instruction is given.
The persons required to attend on the sheriff’s instructions may be identified in the instructions in a way stated in the summons.
The summons might allocate an identifying number to the person to whom the summons is given.
s 27 amd 2017 No. 6 s 47
(sec.27-ssec.1) The sheriff must give to each person selected for summoning a summons requiring the person— to attend for jury service as instructed by the sheriff at places and times to be stated in the instructions; and if selected as a member of a jury, to attend as instructed by the court until discharged by the court.
(sec.27-ssec.2) Without limiting the ways the summons may be given, the summons may be given by email or other electronic means.
(sec.27-ssec.3) A person summoned for jury service may only be instructed by the sheriff to attend for jury service at a time that falls within a period stated in the summons as the jury service period.
(sec.27-ssec.4) The sheriff must instruct a sufficient number of persons to attend for jury service on each day on which a trial or trials are to start in the jury district to enable the selection of juries for the trial or trials.
(sec.27-ssec.5) An instruction to attend for jury service may be given— personally, whether directly or indirectly; or by notice in a newspaper circulating generally in the jury district; or by telephone, radio, television or other form of distance communication; or in a way— authorised under a regulation; or agreed between the sheriff and the person to whom the instruction is given.
(sec.27-ssec.6) The persons required to attend on the sheriff’s instructions may be identified in the instructions in a way stated in the summons. The summons might allocate an identifying number to the person to whom the summons is given.
(a) to attend for jury service as instructed by the sheriff at places and times to be stated in the instructions; and
(b) if selected as a member of a jury, to attend as instructed by the court until discharged by the court.
(a) personally, whether directly or indirectly; or
(b) by notice in a newspaper circulating generally in the jury district; or
(c) by telephone, radio, television or other form of distance communication; or
(d) in a way— (i) authorised under a regulation; or (ii) agreed between the sheriff and the person to whom the instruction is given.
(i) authorised under a regulation; or
(ii) agreed between the sheriff and the person to whom the instruction is given.
(i) authorised under a regulation; or
(ii) agreed between the sheriff and the person to whom the instruction is given.
sec.28
Obligation to comply with summons
sec.28 Obligation to comply with summons
A person must not fail to comply with a summons under this division, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.
Maximum penalty—10 penalty units or 2 months imprisonment.
If a person fails, without reasonable excuse, to attend before a court as instructed by the sheriff or the court under this division, the failure may be dealt with either as an offence against subsection (1) or as a contempt of the court.
(sec.28-ssec.1) A person must not fail to comply with a summons under this division, unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—10 penalty units or 2 months imprisonment.
(sec.28-ssec.2) If a person fails, without reasonable excuse, to attend before a court as instructed by the sheriff or the court under this division, the failure may be dealt with either as an offence against subsection (1) or as a contempt of the court.
sec.29
List of persons summoned for jury service
sec.29 List of persons summoned for jury service
For each jury service period, the sheriff must prepare and keep up to date a list of the persons summoned for jury service in a jury district and not later excused from jury service (the list of persons summoned for jury service ).
The list of persons must state the name, address and occupation, as mentioned in section 37 , of each person on the list.
If asked by a party to a civil or criminal trial that is to take place in the jury district in the jury service period, or a lawyer or other person representing a party, the sheriff must—
give the party, lawyer or other person a copy of the list of persons summoned for jury service; and
identify or provide a means of identifying each person who has been instructed by the sheriff to attend on the day the jury for the relevant trial is to be selected.
The request may be made no earlier than 4.00pm on the business day immediately before the day on which the jury for the trial is to be selected.
A person who has received a copy of the list must return the copy to the sheriff as soon as practicable after the jury for the trial is selected, unless the person has disposed of it in the way directed by a judge under subsection (6) .
Maximum penalty—10 penalty units or 2 months imprisonment.
A judge may direct a person who has received a copy of the list to dispose of it as the judge directs.
The sheriff must destroy copies of the list returned to the sheriff.
s 29 amd 1996 No. 80 s 5
(sec.29-ssec.1) For each jury service period, the sheriff must prepare and keep up to date a list of the persons summoned for jury service in a jury district and not later excused from jury service (the list of persons summoned for jury service ).
(sec.29-ssec.2) The list of persons must state the name, address and occupation, as mentioned in section 37 , of each person on the list.
(sec.29-ssec.3) If asked by a party to a civil or criminal trial that is to take place in the jury district in the jury service period, or a lawyer or other person representing a party, the sheriff must— give the party, lawyer or other person a copy of the list of persons summoned for jury service; and identify or provide a means of identifying each person who has been instructed by the sheriff to attend on the day the jury for the relevant trial is to be selected.
(sec.29-ssec.4) The request may be made no earlier than 4.00pm on the business day immediately before the day on which the jury for the trial is to be selected.
(sec.29-ssec.5) A person who has received a copy of the list must return the copy to the sheriff as soon as practicable after the jury for the trial is selected, unless the person has disposed of it in the way directed by a judge under subsection (6) . Maximum penalty—10 penalty units or 2 months imprisonment.
(sec.29-ssec.6) A judge may direct a person who has received a copy of the list to dispose of it as the judge directs.
(sec.29-ssec.7) The sheriff must destroy copies of the list returned to the sheriff.
(a) give the party, lawyer or other person a copy of the list of persons summoned for jury service; and
(b) identify or provide a means of identifying each person who has been instructed by the sheriff to attend on the day the jury for the relevant trial is to be selected.
sec.30
Reproduction of list of persons summoned for jury service
sec.30 Reproduction of list of persons summoned for jury service
A person who receives a copy of the list of the persons summoned for jury service must not—
reproduce the list or permit its reproduction; or
give the list, or disclose any information in the list, to a person other than a party, or a lawyer or other person representing a party, to the civil or criminal trial to which the list relates.
Maximum penalty—10 penalty units or 2 months imprisonment.
However, the sheriff or a person acting under the sheriff’s authority may—
reproduce the list or permit its reproduction; or
give a copy of the list, or disclose information in the list, to a person who is not a party or the representative of a party;
if it is reasonably necessary for the proper administration of this Act.
The sheriff or a person acting under the sheriff’s authority might have a copy of the list made and give it to the judge who is to preside at the trial or the judge’s associate.
s 30 amd 2017 No. 6 s 48
(sec.30-ssec.1) A person who receives a copy of the list of the persons summoned for jury service must not— reproduce the list or permit its reproduction; or give the list, or disclose any information in the list, to a person other than a party, or a lawyer or other person representing a party, to the civil or criminal trial to which the list relates. Maximum penalty—10 penalty units or 2 months imprisonment.
(sec.30-ssec.2) However, the sheriff or a person acting under the sheriff’s authority may— reproduce the list or permit its reproduction; or give a copy of the list, or disclose information in the list, to a person who is not a party or the representative of a party; if it is reasonably necessary for the proper administration of this Act. The sheriff or a person acting under the sheriff’s authority might have a copy of the list made and give it to the judge who is to preside at the trial or the judge’s associate.
(a) reproduce the list or permit its reproduction; or
(b) give the list, or disclose any information in the list, to a person other than a party, or a lawyer or other person representing a party, to the civil or criminal trial to which the list relates.
(a) reproduce the list or permit its reproduction; or
(b) give a copy of the list, or disclose information in the list, to a person who is not a party or the representative of a party;
sec.31
Questions relating to jury service
sec.31 Questions relating to jury service
A person must not ask questions of a person who has been summoned for jury service to find out how the person is likely to react to issues arising in a trial or for other purposes related to the selection or possible selection of the person as a juror in a trial unless—
the questioning is authorised or required under another provision of this Act; or
a judge authorises the questioning under this section.
Maximum penalty—2 years imprisonment.
A person must not ask questions of anyone about a person (the other person ) who has been summoned for jury service to find out how the other person is likely to react to issues arising in a trial or for other purposes related to the selection or possible selection of the other person as a juror in a trial unless the questioning is authorised or required under another provision of this Act.
Maximum penalty—2 years imprisonment.
Subsection (2) does not apply to discussions between a party and the party’s lawyer.
A judge may, on conditions the judge considers appropriate, authorise a person to ask questions of a person who has been summoned for jury service.
A person must not contravene a condition under subsection (4) .
Maximum penalty for subsection (5) —2 years imprisonment.
(sec.31-ssec.1) A person must not ask questions of a person who has been summoned for jury service to find out how the person is likely to react to issues arising in a trial or for other purposes related to the selection or possible selection of the person as a juror in a trial unless— the questioning is authorised or required under another provision of this Act; or a judge authorises the questioning under this section. Maximum penalty—2 years imprisonment.
(sec.31-ssec.2) A person must not ask questions of anyone about a person (the other person ) who has been summoned for jury service to find out how the other person is likely to react to issues arising in a trial or for other purposes related to the selection or possible selection of the other person as a juror in a trial unless the questioning is authorised or required under another provision of this Act. Maximum penalty—2 years imprisonment.
(sec.31-ssec.3) Subsection (2) does not apply to discussions between a party and the party’s lawyer.
(sec.31-ssec.4) A judge may, on conditions the judge considers appropriate, authorise a person to ask questions of a person who has been summoned for jury service.
(sec.31-ssec.5) A person must not contravene a condition under subsection (4) . Maximum penalty for subsection (5) —2 years imprisonment.
(a) the questioning is authorised or required under another provision of this Act; or
(b) a judge authorises the questioning under this section.
pt.5
Formation of juries
Formation of juries
pt.5-div.1
Number of jurors in trials
Number of jurors in trials
sec.32
Juries for civil trials
sec.32 Juries for civil trials
The jury for a civil trial consists of 4 persons.
sec.33
Juries for criminal trials
sec.33 Juries for criminal trials
The jury for a criminal trial consists of 12 persons.
sec.34
Reserve jurors
sec.34 Reserve jurors
The judge before which a civil or criminal trial is to be held may direct that not more than 3 persons be chosen and sworn as reserve jurors.
Reserve jurors—
are to be selected in the same way as ordinary jurors; and
are liable to be challenged and discharged in the same way as ordinary jurors; and
must take the same oath as ordinary jurors; and
are otherwise subject to the same arrangements as other jurors during the trial.
If a juror dies or is discharged after a trial starts but before the jury retires to consider its verdict, and a reserve juror is available, the reserve juror must take the vacant place on the jury.
See section 56 (Discharge or death of individual juror).
If 2 or more reserve jurors are available, the juror to take the place on the jury must be decided by lot or in another way decided by the judge.
When a jury retires to consider its verdict, a reserve juror who has not been called on to take a place on the jury must be discharged from further attendance at the trial.
The death or discharge of a reserve juror before the juror has been called on to take a vacant place on the jury does not affect the validity of the trial.
(sec.34-ssec.1) The judge before which a civil or criminal trial is to be held may direct that not more than 3 persons be chosen and sworn as reserve jurors.
(sec.34-ssec.2) Reserve jurors— are to be selected in the same way as ordinary jurors; and are liable to be challenged and discharged in the same way as ordinary jurors; and must take the same oath as ordinary jurors; and are otherwise subject to the same arrangements as other jurors during the trial.
(sec.34-ssec.3) If a juror dies or is discharged after a trial starts but before the jury retires to consider its verdict, and a reserve juror is available, the reserve juror must take the vacant place on the jury. See section 56 (Discharge or death of individual juror).
(sec.34-ssec.4) If 2 or more reserve jurors are available, the juror to take the place on the jury must be decided by lot or in another way decided by the judge.
(sec.34-ssec.5) When a jury retires to consider its verdict, a reserve juror who has not been called on to take a place on the jury must be discharged from further attendance at the trial.
(sec.34-ssec.6) The death or discharge of a reserve juror before the juror has been called on to take a vacant place on the jury does not affect the validity of the trial.
(a) are to be selected in the same way as ordinary jurors; and
(b) are liable to be challenged and discharged in the same way as ordinary jurors; and
(c) must take the same oath as ordinary jurors; and
(d) are otherwise subject to the same arrangements as other jurors during the trial.
pt.5-div.2
Suitability of jurors
Suitability of jurors
sec.35
Information about prospective jurors to be exchanged between prosecution and defence in criminal trials
sec.35 Information about prospective jurors to be exchanged between prosecution and defence in criminal trials
If a party to a criminal trial obtains information about a person who has been summoned for jury service that may show the person is unsuitable to serve as a juror in the trial, the party must disclose the information to the other party as soon as practicable.
The Criminal Law (Rehabilitation of Offenders) Act 1986 does not apply to the disclosure of information under this section.
The Criminal Law (Rehabilitation of Offenders) Act 1986 , section 6 , places restrictions on disclosure of the criminal history of a person by someone if the rehabilitation period under the Act has come to an end.
(sec.35-ssec.1) If a party to a criminal trial obtains information about a person who has been summoned for jury service that may show the person is unsuitable to serve as a juror in the trial, the party must disclose the information to the other party as soon as practicable.
(sec.35-ssec.2) The Criminal Law (Rehabilitation of Offenders) Act 1986 does not apply to the disclosure of information under this section. The Criminal Law (Rehabilitation of Offenders) Act 1986 , section 6 , places restrictions on disclosure of the criminal history of a person by someone if the rehabilitation period under the Act has come to an end.
pt.5-div.3
Attendance of jury panel
Attendance of jury panel
sec.36
Sheriff to arrange for attendance of jury panel
sec.36 Sheriff to arrange for attendance of jury panel
When a civil or criminal trial is about to begin, the sheriff must arrange for the attendance of a jury panel before the court.
The panel must be formed from among the persons (the relevant prospective jurors ) who—
have been summoned for jury service for the relevant jury service period; and
have not, after being summoned, been excused from jury service or excluded from the list of prospective jurors because they are not qualified for jury service; and
are not currently serving on a jury.
The panel must be formed by selection from among the relevant prospective jurors in a way decided by the sheriff subject to any relevant direction issued by the Senior Judge Administrator under section 13 (c) .
When the panel is formed, the sheriff must give the instructions to the members of the panel necessary to ensure their attendance before the court.
s 36 amd 1996 No. 80 s 6
(sec.36-ssec.1) When a civil or criminal trial is about to begin, the sheriff must arrange for the attendance of a jury panel before the court.
(sec.36-ssec.2) The panel must be formed from among the persons (the relevant prospective jurors ) who— have been summoned for jury service for the relevant jury service period; and have not, after being summoned, been excused from jury service or excluded from the list of prospective jurors because they are not qualified for jury service; and are not currently serving on a jury.
(sec.36-ssec.3) The panel must be formed by selection from among the relevant prospective jurors in a way decided by the sheriff subject to any relevant direction issued by the Senior Judge Administrator under section 13 (c) .
(sec.36-ssec.4) When the panel is formed, the sheriff must give the instructions to the members of the panel necessary to ensure their attendance before the court.
(a) have been summoned for jury service for the relevant jury service period; and
(b) have not, after being summoned, been excused from jury service or excluded from the list of prospective jurors because they are not qualified for jury service; and
(c) are not currently serving on a jury.
sec.37
Materials to be given by sheriff
sec.37 Materials to be given by sheriff
Before the attendance of the jury panel before the court, the sheriff must give the judge’s associate—
a list stating the names, locality addresses and occupations of all persons on the panel; and
1 card (a jury card ) for each member of the panel that states—
the name of, or a number representing, the member; and
the locality address and occupation of the member.
The jury cards for the members of a panel—
may be given by electronic means; and
if not given by electronic means—must be of identical size and shape.
If a person has no present remunerative occupation and is not engaged in domestic duties, the person’s occupation is taken to be the person’s last remunerative occupation and, if the person has never had a remunerative occupation and is not engaged in domestic duties, a note to that effect must appear in place of a statement of occupation.
In this section—
locality address , of a person, means the city, town, suburb or other locality in which the person resides.
s 37 amd 2002 No. 23 s 53 ; 2017 No. 6 s 49
(sec.37-ssec.1) Before the attendance of the jury panel before the court, the sheriff must give the judge’s associate— a list stating the names, locality addresses and occupations of all persons on the panel; and 1 card (a jury card ) for each member of the panel that states— the name of, or a number representing, the member; and the locality address and occupation of the member.
(sec.37-ssec.2) The jury cards for the members of a panel— may be given by electronic means; and if not given by electronic means—must be of identical size and shape.
(sec.37-ssec.3) If a person has no present remunerative occupation and is not engaged in domestic duties, the person’s occupation is taken to be the person’s last remunerative occupation and, if the person has never had a remunerative occupation and is not engaged in domestic duties, a note to that effect must appear in place of a statement of occupation.
(sec.37-ssec.4) In this section— locality address , of a person, means the city, town, suburb or other locality in which the person resides.
(a) a list stating the names, locality addresses and occupations of all persons on the panel; and
(b) 1 card (a jury card ) for each member of the panel that states— (i) the name of, or a number representing, the member; and (ii) the locality address and occupation of the member.
(i) the name of, or a number representing, the member; and
(ii) the locality address and occupation of the member.
(i) the name of, or a number representing, the member; and
(ii) the locality address and occupation of the member.
(a) may be given by electronic means; and
(b) if not given by electronic means—must be of identical size and shape.
pt.5-div.4
Supplementary jurors
Supplementary jurors
sec.38
Supplementary jurors
sec.38 Supplementary jurors
If a trial is likely to be delayed because there are no persons or not enough persons, who have been summoned for jury service, available for the selection of a jury, the judge may, on application by a party to the proceeding, direct the sheriff to make up or supplement a jury panel by selecting from among persons who are qualified for jury service and instructing them to attend for jury service.
The number of persons to be selected, and the way the selection is to be made, must be as directed by the judge.
The persons instructed to attend for jury service under this section become (subject to being excused or discharged under this Act) members of the jury panel from which the jury for the trial is to be selected.
Unless the person has a reasonable excuse, a person must not fail to comply with—
an instruction to attend for jury service under this section; or
a further instruction about jury service given by the sheriff or the judge.
Maximum penalty—10 penalty units or 2 months imprisonment.
A contravention of subsection (4) may be dealt with either as an offence or a contempt of the court.
(sec.38-ssec.1) If a trial is likely to be delayed because there are no persons or not enough persons, who have been summoned for jury service, available for the selection of a jury, the judge may, on application by a party to the proceeding, direct the sheriff to make up or supplement a jury panel by selecting from among persons who are qualified for jury service and instructing them to attend for jury service.
(sec.38-ssec.2) The number of persons to be selected, and the way the selection is to be made, must be as directed by the judge.
(sec.38-ssec.3) The persons instructed to attend for jury service under this section become (subject to being excused or discharged under this Act) members of the jury panel from which the jury for the trial is to be selected.
(sec.38-ssec.4) Unless the person has a reasonable excuse, a person must not fail to comply with— an instruction to attend for jury service under this section; or a further instruction about jury service given by the sheriff or the judge. Maximum penalty—10 penalty units or 2 months imprisonment.
(sec.38-ssec.5) A contravention of subsection (4) may be dealt with either as an offence or a contempt of the court.
(a) an instruction to attend for jury service under this section; or
(b) a further instruction about jury service given by the sheriff or the judge.
pt.5-div.5
Preliminaries to jury selection
Preliminaries to jury selection
sec.39
Defendant to be informed of right of challenge
sec.39 Defendant to be informed of right of challenge
Before the selection of a jury for a criminal trial begins, the court must inform the defendant that—
the persons whose names are to be called may be sworn as jurors for the defendant’s trial; and
if the defendant wants to challenge any of them, the defendant, or the defendant’s lawyer or other representative, must make the challenge before the person is sworn as a juror.
(a) the persons whose names are to be called may be sworn as jurors for the defendant’s trial; and
(b) if the defendant wants to challenge any of them, the defendant, or the defendant’s lawyer or other representative, must make the challenge before the person is sworn as a juror.
sec.40
Challenge to jury panel as a whole
sec.40 Challenge to jury panel as a whole
A party to a civil or criminal trial who objects to the entire jury panel may challenge the entire jury panel by informing the judge of the reasons for the objection before any juror is sworn for the trial.
The judge must decide the challenge before proceeding with the selection of the jury for the trial.
(sec.40-ssec.1) A party to a civil or criminal trial who objects to the entire jury panel may challenge the entire jury panel by informing the judge of the reasons for the objection before any juror is sworn for the trial.
(sec.40-ssec.2) The judge must decide the challenge before proceeding with the selection of the jury for the trial.
pt.5-div.6
Selection of jury
Selection of jury
sec.41
Procedure for jury selection
sec.41 Procedure for jury selection
When a jury is to be selected for a civil or criminal trial—
a selection must be made, as directed by the judge, from among the members of the jury panel by random selection of jury cards, including, for example, by a computer programmed to make a random selection; and
as each person is selected an officer of the court must call aloud the name of the person selected.
However, the judge may direct that persons selected be identified by numbers only if the judge considers that, for security or other reasons, the persons’ names should not be read out in open court.
The judge’s associate must inform the sheriff as soon as practicable of—
the names of the persons sworn to serve on the jury or as reserve jurors; and
if the judge orders that a juror or prospective juror be excused, discharged or fined—the name of the person and the terms of the order.
s 41 amd 2017 No. 6 s 50
(sec.41-ssec.1) When a jury is to be selected for a civil or criminal trial— a selection must be made, as directed by the judge, from among the members of the jury panel by random selection of jury cards, including, for example, by a computer programmed to make a random selection; and as each person is selected an officer of the court must call aloud the name of the person selected.
(sec.41-ssec.2) However, the judge may direct that persons selected be identified by numbers only if the judge considers that, for security or other reasons, the persons’ names should not be read out in open court.
(sec.41-ssec.3) The judge’s associate must inform the sheriff as soon as practicable of— the names of the persons sworn to serve on the jury or as reserve jurors; and if the judge orders that a juror or prospective juror be excused, discharged or fined—the name of the person and the terms of the order.
(a) a selection must be made, as directed by the judge, from among the members of the jury panel by random selection of jury cards, including, for example, by a computer programmed to make a random selection; and
(b) as each person is selected an officer of the court must call aloud the name of the person selected.
(a) the names of the persons sworn to serve on the jury or as reserve jurors; and
(b) if the judge orders that a juror or prospective juror be excused, discharged or fined—the name of the person and the terms of the order.
sec.42
Peremptory challenges
sec.42 Peremptory challenges
In a civil trial, each party is entitled to 2 peremptory challenges.
If reserve jurors are to be selected for a civil trial, each party is entitled to—
if 1 or 2 reserve jurors are to be selected—1 additional peremptory challenge; and
if 3 reserve jurors are to be selected—2 additional peremptory challenges.
In a criminal trial, the prosecution and defence are each entitled to 8 peremptory challenges.
If reserve jurors are to be selected for a criminal trial, the prosecution and defence are each entitled to—
if 1 or 2 reserve jurors are to be selected—1 additional peremptory challenge; and
if 3 reserve jurors are to be selected—2 additional peremptory challenges.
If there are 2 or more defendants in a criminal trial—
each defendant is entitled to the number of peremptory challenges allowed to the defence under subsections (3) and (4) ; and
the prosecution is entitled to a number of peremptory challenges equal to the total number available to all defendants.
(sec.42-ssec.1) In a civil trial, each party is entitled to 2 peremptory challenges.
(sec.42-ssec.2) If reserve jurors are to be selected for a civil trial, each party is entitled to— if 1 or 2 reserve jurors are to be selected—1 additional peremptory challenge; and if 3 reserve jurors are to be selected—2 additional peremptory challenges.
(sec.42-ssec.3) In a criminal trial, the prosecution and defence are each entitled to 8 peremptory challenges.
(sec.42-ssec.4) If reserve jurors are to be selected for a criminal trial, the prosecution and defence are each entitled to— if 1 or 2 reserve jurors are to be selected—1 additional peremptory challenge; and if 3 reserve jurors are to be selected—2 additional peremptory challenges.
(sec.42-ssec.5) If there are 2 or more defendants in a criminal trial— each defendant is entitled to the number of peremptory challenges allowed to the defence under subsections (3) and (4) ; and the prosecution is entitled to a number of peremptory challenges equal to the total number available to all defendants.
(a) if 1 or 2 reserve jurors are to be selected—1 additional peremptory challenge; and
(b) if 3 reserve jurors are to be selected—2 additional peremptory challenges.
(a) if 1 or 2 reserve jurors are to be selected—1 additional peremptory challenge; and
(b) if 3 reserve jurors are to be selected—2 additional peremptory challenges.
(a) each defendant is entitled to the number of peremptory challenges allowed to the defence under subsections (3) and (4) ; and
(b) the prosecution is entitled to a number of peremptory challenges equal to the total number available to all defendants.
sec.43
Challenges for cause
sec.43 Challenges for cause
A party to a civil or criminal trial may challenge for cause against a person selected to serve on the jury or as a reserve juror.
A challenge for cause under this section is made by objecting to the selection of the person against whom the challenge is made on either or both of the following grounds—
the person is not qualified for jury service;
the person is not impartial.
A party who makes a challenge for cause must inform the judge of the reasons for the challenge and give the judge information and materials available to the party that are relevant to the challenge.
If the judge is satisfied there are proper grounds to inquire into the qualification or impartiality of the person against whom the challenge is made, the judge may—
permit the party to put questions to the person in a way and in a form decided by the judge; and
if the person’s answers to the questions give grounds for further inquiry—permit the examination or cross-examination of the person on oath.
The Criminal Law (Rehabilitation of Offenders) Act 1986 does not apply to the disclosure of information in response to questions asked under this section.
The Criminal Law (Rehabilitation of Offenders) Act 1986 , section 6 , places restrictions on disclosure of the criminal history of a person by someone if the rehabilitation period under the Act has come to an end.
After considering the evidence and submissions of parties, the judge must uphold or dismiss the challenge.
The judge’s decision under this section is not subject to interlocutory appeal but, if the final judgment of the court is liable to appeal, may be considered on an appeal against the final judgment of the court.
A challenge for cause does not reduce the number of peremptory challenges available to the party who makes the challenge.
(sec.43-ssec.1) A party to a civil or criminal trial may challenge for cause against a person selected to serve on the jury or as a reserve juror.
(sec.43-ssec.2) A challenge for cause under this section is made by objecting to the selection of the person against whom the challenge is made on either or both of the following grounds— the person is not qualified for jury service; the person is not impartial.
(sec.43-ssec.3) A party who makes a challenge for cause must inform the judge of the reasons for the challenge and give the judge information and materials available to the party that are relevant to the challenge.
(sec.43-ssec.4) If the judge is satisfied there are proper grounds to inquire into the qualification or impartiality of the person against whom the challenge is made, the judge may— permit the party to put questions to the person in a way and in a form decided by the judge; and if the person’s answers to the questions give grounds for further inquiry—permit the examination or cross-examination of the person on oath.
(sec.43-ssec.5) The Criminal Law (Rehabilitation of Offenders) Act 1986 does not apply to the disclosure of information in response to questions asked under this section. The Criminal Law (Rehabilitation of Offenders) Act 1986 , section 6 , places restrictions on disclosure of the criminal history of a person by someone if the rehabilitation period under the Act has come to an end.
(sec.43-ssec.6) After considering the evidence and submissions of parties, the judge must uphold or dismiss the challenge.
(sec.43-ssec.7) The judge’s decision under this section is not subject to interlocutory appeal but, if the final judgment of the court is liable to appeal, may be considered on an appeal against the final judgment of the court.
(sec.43-ssec.8) A challenge for cause does not reduce the number of peremptory challenges available to the party who makes the challenge.
(a) the person is not qualified for jury service;
(b) the person is not impartial.
(a) permit the party to put questions to the person in a way and in a form decided by the judge; and
(b) if the person’s answers to the questions give grounds for further inquiry—permit the examination or cross-examination of the person on oath.
sec.44
Time for challenges
sec.44 Time for challenges
A peremptory challenge must be made before the officer assigned by the court to administer the oath begins to recite the words of the oath to the person challenged.
A challenge for cause must be made before the officer assigned by the court to administer the oath begins to recite the words of the oath to the person challenged.
A challenge for cause may also be made during a proceeding under section 47 .
(sec.44-ssec.1) A peremptory challenge must be made before the officer assigned by the court to administer the oath begins to recite the words of the oath to the person challenged.
(sec.44-ssec.2) A challenge for cause must be made before the officer assigned by the court to administer the oath begins to recite the words of the oath to the person challenged.
(sec.44-ssec.3) A challenge for cause may also be made during a proceeding under section 47 .
pt.5-div.7
Final stage of jury selection process
Final stage of jury selection process
sec.45
Final stage of jury selection process
sec.45 Final stage of jury selection process
The court reaches the final stage of the jury selection process when all jurors and reserve jurors have been selected and sworn but the jury panel has not yet been discharged.
sec.46
Judge’s discretion to discharge juror in final stage of jury selection process
sec.46 Judge’s discretion to discharge juror in final stage of jury selection process
When the judge reaches the final stage of the jury selection process, the judge may discharge a person who has been selected as a juror or a reserve juror if the judge considers there is reason to doubt the impartiality of the person.
The judge may discharge a person under this section whether or not a challenge for cause is made.
If a person is discharged under this section, another person must be selected from the jury panel to take the person’s place as a juror or reserve juror.
(sec.46-ssec.1) When the judge reaches the final stage of the jury selection process, the judge may discharge a person who has been selected as a juror or a reserve juror if the judge considers there is reason to doubt the impartiality of the person.
(sec.46-ssec.2) The judge may discharge a person under this section whether or not a challenge for cause is made.
(sec.46-ssec.3) If a person is discharged under this section, another person must be selected from the jury panel to take the person’s place as a juror or reserve juror.
sec.47
Special procedure for challenge for cause in certain cases
sec.47 Special procedure for challenge for cause in certain cases
If a judge who is to preside at a civil or criminal trial is satisfied, on an application by a party under this section, that there are special reasons for inquiry under this section, the judge may authorise the questioning of persons selected to serve as jurors and reserve jurors when the court reaches the final stage of the jury selection process.
Prejudicial pre-trial publicity may be a special reason for questioning persons selected as jurors or reserve jurors in the final stage of the jury selection process.
The application must be made to the judge at least 3 days before the date fixed for the trial to start unless the judge, for special reasons, dispenses with the requirement.
On the application, the applicant may suggest, and the judge may decide, questions that are to be put to persons selected to serve as jurors or reserve jurors for the trial.
The judge must put the questions in a way decided by the judge.
The judge might decide that the questions are to be put to the persons selected to serve as jurors or reserve jurors in each other’s presence in open court, or that the questions are to be put to each person individually.
If, after hearing the answers of a person questioned under this section, the judge considers further inquiry is justified, the judge may give the parties leave to cross-examine the person on oath (under limits fixed by the judge) to find out whether the person is impartial.
When a person has answered the questions put under this section and any further examination allowed by the judge has finished, a party may make a challenge for cause against the person on the ground that the person is not impartial.
A party who makes a challenge under this section must inform the judge of the reasons for the challenge and, if the party has information or materials relevant to the challenge in addition to the information or materials already before the court, give the judge the information and materials.
After considering the evidence and submissions of the parties the judge must—
uphold the challenge and discharge the person selected to serve as a juror (or reserve juror); or
dismiss the challenge.
If the judge upholds the challenge and discharges the selected person, another person must be selected from the jury panel to fill the vacancy.
When a person is selected to fill a vacancy under subsection (9) —
a party may—
if the party has not already exhausted the party’s rights of peremptory challenge—challenge the person peremptorily; or
challenge the person for cause;
in the same way as on the original selection of persons to serve as jurors (or reserve jurors); and
See sections 42 (Peremptory challenges) and 43 (Challenges for cause).
the person is also liable to be questioned, cross-examined and challenged under this section in the same way as the other persons selected as jurors or reserve jurors.
A decision of the judge under this section is not subject to interlocutory appeal but, if the final judgment of the court is liable to appeal, may be considered on an appeal against the final judgment of the court.
(sec.47-ssec.1) If a judge who is to preside at a civil or criminal trial is satisfied, on an application by a party under this section, that there are special reasons for inquiry under this section, the judge may authorise the questioning of persons selected to serve as jurors and reserve jurors when the court reaches the final stage of the jury selection process. Prejudicial pre-trial publicity may be a special reason for questioning persons selected as jurors or reserve jurors in the final stage of the jury selection process.
(sec.47-ssec.2) The application must be made to the judge at least 3 days before the date fixed for the trial to start unless the judge, for special reasons, dispenses with the requirement.
(sec.47-ssec.3) On the application, the applicant may suggest, and the judge may decide, questions that are to be put to persons selected to serve as jurors or reserve jurors for the trial.
(sec.47-ssec.4) The judge must put the questions in a way decided by the judge. The judge might decide that the questions are to be put to the persons selected to serve as jurors or reserve jurors in each other’s presence in open court, or that the questions are to be put to each person individually.
(sec.47-ssec.5) If, after hearing the answers of a person questioned under this section, the judge considers further inquiry is justified, the judge may give the parties leave to cross-examine the person on oath (under limits fixed by the judge) to find out whether the person is impartial.
(sec.47-ssec.6) When a person has answered the questions put under this section and any further examination allowed by the judge has finished, a party may make a challenge for cause against the person on the ground that the person is not impartial.
(sec.47-ssec.7) A party who makes a challenge under this section must inform the judge of the reasons for the challenge and, if the party has information or materials relevant to the challenge in addition to the information or materials already before the court, give the judge the information and materials.
(sec.47-ssec.8) After considering the evidence and submissions of the parties the judge must— uphold the challenge and discharge the person selected to serve as a juror (or reserve juror); or dismiss the challenge.
(sec.47-ssec.9) If the judge upholds the challenge and discharges the selected person, another person must be selected from the jury panel to fill the vacancy.
(sec.47-ssec.10) When a person is selected to fill a vacancy under subsection (9) — a party may— if the party has not already exhausted the party’s rights of peremptory challenge—challenge the person peremptorily; or challenge the person for cause; in the same way as on the original selection of persons to serve as jurors (or reserve jurors); and See sections 42 (Peremptory challenges) and 43 (Challenges for cause). the person is also liable to be questioned, cross-examined and challenged under this section in the same way as the other persons selected as jurors or reserve jurors.
(sec.47-ssec.11) A decision of the judge under this section is not subject to interlocutory appeal but, if the final judgment of the court is liable to appeal, may be considered on an appeal against the final judgment of the court.
(a) uphold the challenge and discharge the person selected to serve as a juror (or reserve juror); or
(b) dismiss the challenge.
(a) a party may— (i) if the party has not already exhausted the party’s rights of peremptory challenge—challenge the person peremptorily; or (ii) challenge the person for cause;
(i) if the party has not already exhausted the party’s rights of peremptory challenge—challenge the person peremptorily; or
(ii) challenge the person for cause;
in the same way as on the original selection of persons to serve as jurors (or reserve jurors); and Editor’s note— See sections 42 (Peremptory challenges) and 43 (Challenges for cause).
(b) the person is also liable to be questioned, cross-examined and challenged under this section in the same way as the other persons selected as jurors or reserve jurors.
(i) if the party has not already exhausted the party’s rights of peremptory challenge—challenge the person peremptorily; or
(ii) challenge the person for cause;
sec.48
Judge’s discretion to discharge entire jury
sec.48 Judge’s discretion to discharge entire jury
Before the court finishes the final stage of the jury selection process, the judge may discharge all the persons selected to serve as jurors if the judge considers that the challenges made to persons selected to serve on the jury or as reserve jurors have resulted in a jury of a composition that may cause the trial to be, or appear to be, unfair.
If all the persons selected to serve as jurors are discharged, another jury must be selected from the jury panel.
(sec.48-ssec.1) Before the court finishes the final stage of the jury selection process, the judge may discharge all the persons selected to serve as jurors if the judge considers that the challenges made to persons selected to serve on the jury or as reserve jurors have resulted in a jury of a composition that may cause the trial to be, or appear to be, unfair.
(sec.48-ssec.2) If all the persons selected to serve as jurors are discharged, another jury must be selected from the jury panel.
pt.5-div.8
Presumption of authority
Presumption of authority
sec.49
Presumption of authority for challenge
sec.49 Presumption of authority for challenge
If a challenge to a person selected as a juror or reserve juror is made by a lawyer or other representative of a party, the challenge is presumed in the absence of evidence to the contrary to have been made on the party’s authority.
pt.6
Jury trials
Jury trials
pt.6-div.1
Procedure following selection of jury
Procedure following selection of jury
sec.50
Jury to be sworn
sec.50 Jury to be sworn
The members of the jury must be sworn to give a true verdict, according to the evidence, on the issues to be tried, and not to disclose anything about the jury’s deliberations except as allowed or required by law.
For the form of the oath, see the Oaths Act 1867 , sections 21 (Swearing of jurors in civil trials) and 22 (Swearing of jurors in criminal trials). Under the Oaths Act 1867 , section 17 , a juror may make an affirmation instead of an oath in certain cases (see also section 5 of that Act).
sec.51
Jury to be informed of charge in criminal trial
sec.51 Jury to be informed of charge in criminal trial
When the jury for a criminal trial has been sworn, the judge must ensure the jury is informed—
in appropriate detail, of the charge contained in the indictment; and
of the jury’s duty on the trial.
s 51 amd 1996 No. 80 s 7
(a) in appropriate detail, of the charge contained in the indictment; and
(b) of the jury’s duty on the trial.
pt.6-div.1A
Duty of judge and jury in civil cases
Duty of judge and jury in civil cases
sec.51A
Duty of judge and jury
sec.51A Duty of judge and jury
In a civil trial—
it is the jury’s duty to answer any question of fact that is left to the jury by the presiding judge; and
it is the presiding judge’s duty to instruct the jury about the law applicable to the proceeding, with the observations on the evidence the judge considers appropriate to make.
s 51A ins 2011 No. 45 s 151
(a) it is the jury’s duty to answer any question of fact that is left to the jury by the presiding judge; and
(b) it is the presiding judge’s duty to instruct the jury about the law applicable to the proceeding, with the observations on the evidence the judge considers appropriate to make.
pt.6-div.2
Inspections and views
Inspections and views
sec.52
Inspections and views
sec.52 Inspections and views
If, on a trial, the judge considers it desirable for the jury to have a view of a particular place or object, the judge may give the necessary directions.
The view must be held in the presence of the judge, and the parties and their lawyers or other representatives are entitled to be present.
The validity of proceedings is not affected by contravention of a direction but, if the contravention is discovered before the verdict is given, the judge may discharge the jury if the judge considers the contravention appears likely to prejudice a fair trial.
(sec.52-ssec.1) If, on a trial, the judge considers it desirable for the jury to have a view of a particular place or object, the judge may give the necessary directions.
(sec.52-ssec.2) The view must be held in the presence of the judge, and the parties and their lawyers or other representatives are entitled to be present.
(sec.52-ssec.3) The validity of proceedings is not affected by contravention of a direction but, if the contravention is discovered before the verdict is given, the judge may discharge the jury if the judge considers the contravention appears likely to prejudice a fair trial.
pt.6-div.3
Segregation of jury in criminal cases
Segregation of jury in criminal cases
sec.53
Separation of jury
sec.53 Separation of jury
After the jury in a criminal trial has been sworn, the jury must not separate until it has given its verdict or has been discharged by the judge.
However, a jury may separate in accordance with this section.
Before a jury retires to consider its verdict, the judge must allow the jury to separate during a lunch or dinner adjournment to obtain meals.
However, if the judge considers that allowing the jury to separate during a lunch or dinner adjournment may prejudice a fair trial, the judge may order the jury not to separate.
Subsection (6) applies subject to subsections (3) and (4) .
Also, before a jury retires to consider its verdict, the judge may, if the judge considers that allowing the jury to separate would not prejudice a fair trial, allow the jury to separate—
during an adjournment of the court; or
while proceedings are held in the jury’s absence.
After the jury has retired to consider its verdict, the judge—
may allow the jury to separate, or an individual juror to separate from the jury, if the judge considers that allowing the jury or juror to separate would not prejudice a fair trial; and
may impose conditions to be complied with by the jurors or juror.
A juror must comply with any conditions imposed by the judge under subsection (7) (b) , unless the juror has a reasonable excuse.
Maximum penalty—10 penalty units or 2 months imprisonment.
If a juror separates from the rest of the jury in contravention of a provision of this section, the juror may be punished summarily for contempt of the court.
The validity of proceedings is not affected if a juror contravenes a provision of this section but, if the contravention is discovered before the verdict is given, the judge may discharge the jury if the judge considers that the contravention appears likely to prejudice a fair trial.
s 53 amd 1996 No. 79 s 52
sub 2008 No. 54 s 26
(sec.53-ssec.1) After the jury in a criminal trial has been sworn, the jury must not separate until it has given its verdict or has been discharged by the judge.
(sec.53-ssec.2) However, a jury may separate in accordance with this section.
(sec.53-ssec.3) Before a jury retires to consider its verdict, the judge must allow the jury to separate during a lunch or dinner adjournment to obtain meals.
(sec.53-ssec.4) However, if the judge considers that allowing the jury to separate during a lunch or dinner adjournment may prejudice a fair trial, the judge may order the jury not to separate.
(sec.53-ssec.5) Subsection (6) applies subject to subsections (3) and (4) .
(sec.53-ssec.6) Also, before a jury retires to consider its verdict, the judge may, if the judge considers that allowing the jury to separate would not prejudice a fair trial, allow the jury to separate— during an adjournment of the court; or while proceedings are held in the jury’s absence.
(sec.53-ssec.7) After the jury has retired to consider its verdict, the judge— may allow the jury to separate, or an individual juror to separate from the jury, if the judge considers that allowing the jury or juror to separate would not prejudice a fair trial; and may impose conditions to be complied with by the jurors or juror.
(sec.53-ssec.8) A juror must comply with any conditions imposed by the judge under subsection (7) (b) , unless the juror has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—10 penalty units or 2 months imprisonment.
(sec.53-ssec.9) If a juror separates from the rest of the jury in contravention of a provision of this section, the juror may be punished summarily for contempt of the court.
(sec.53-ssec.10) The validity of proceedings is not affected if a juror contravenes a provision of this section but, if the contravention is discovered before the verdict is given, the judge may discharge the jury if the judge considers that the contravention appears likely to prejudice a fair trial.
(a) during an adjournment of the court; or
(b) while proceedings are held in the jury’s absence.
(a) may allow the jury to separate, or an individual juror to separate from the jury, if the judge considers that allowing the jury or juror to separate would not prejudice a fair trial; and
(b) may impose conditions to be complied with by the jurors or juror.
sec.54
Restriction on communication
sec.54 Restriction on communication
While a jury is kept together, a person (other than a member of the jury or a reserve juror) must not communicate with any of the jurors without the judge’s leave.
Despite subsection (1) —
the officer of the court who has charge of the jury may communicate with jurors with the judge’s leave; and
if a juror is ill—communication with the juror for arranging or administering medical treatment does not require the judge’s leave.
A person who contravenes subsection (1) may be punished summarily for a contempt of the court.
The validity of proceedings is not affected by contravention of this section but, if the contravention is discovered before the verdict is given, the judge may discharge the jury if the judge considers that the contravention appears likely to prejudice a fair trial.
(sec.54-ssec.1) While a jury is kept together, a person (other than a member of the jury or a reserve juror) must not communicate with any of the jurors without the judge’s leave.
(sec.54-ssec.2) Despite subsection (1) — the officer of the court who has charge of the jury may communicate with jurors with the judge’s leave; and if a juror is ill—communication with the juror for arranging or administering medical treatment does not require the judge’s leave.
(sec.54-ssec.3) A person who contravenes subsection (1) may be punished summarily for a contempt of the court.
(sec.54-ssec.4) The validity of proceedings is not affected by contravention of this section but, if the contravention is discovered before the verdict is given, the judge may discharge the jury if the judge considers that the contravention appears likely to prejudice a fair trial.
(a) the officer of the court who has charge of the jury may communicate with jurors with the judge’s leave; and
(b) if a juror is ill—communication with the juror for arranging or administering medical treatment does not require the judge’s leave.
pt.6-div.4
Accommodation for jury
Accommodation for jury
sec.55
Accommodation for jury
sec.55 Accommodation for jury
While a jury is kept together outside the courtroom, the jurors must be kept—
in a private place under the supervision of an officer of the court; or
as the judge directs.
While a jury is kept together outside the courtroom, the jurors must be provided with accommodation, meals and refreshments as the judge directs.
(sec.55-ssec.1) While a jury is kept together outside the courtroom, the jurors must be kept— in a private place under the supervision of an officer of the court; or as the judge directs.
(sec.55-ssec.2) While a jury is kept together outside the courtroom, the jurors must be provided with accommodation, meals and refreshments as the judge directs.
(a) in a private place under the supervision of an officer of the court; or
(b) as the judge directs.
pt.6-div.5
Discharge of individual jurors or of whole jury
Discharge of individual jurors or of whole jury
sec.56
Discharge or death of individual juror
sec.56 Discharge or death of individual juror
If, after a juror has been sworn—
it appears to the judge (from the juror’s own statements or from evidence before the judge) that the juror is not impartial or ought not, for other reasons, be allowed or required to act as a juror at the trial; or
the juror becomes incapable, in the judge’s opinion, of continuing to act as a juror; or
the juror becomes unavailable, for reasons the judge considers adequate, to continue as a juror;
the judge may, without discharging the whole jury, discharge the juror.
If a juror dies or is discharged before the trial begins, the judge may direct that another juror be selected and sworn.
(sec.56-ssec.1) If, after a juror has been sworn— it appears to the judge (from the juror’s own statements or from evidence before the judge) that the juror is not impartial or ought not, for other reasons, be allowed or required to act as a juror at the trial; or the juror becomes incapable, in the judge’s opinion, of continuing to act as a juror; or the juror becomes unavailable, for reasons the judge considers adequate, to continue as a juror; the judge may, without discharging the whole jury, discharge the juror.
(sec.56-ssec.2) If a juror dies or is discharged before the trial begins, the judge may direct that another juror be selected and sworn.
(a) it appears to the judge (from the juror’s own statements or from evidence before the judge) that the juror is not impartial or ought not, for other reasons, be allowed or required to act as a juror at the trial; or
(b) the juror becomes incapable, in the judge’s opinion, of continuing to act as a juror; or
(c) the juror becomes unavailable, for reasons the judge considers adequate, to continue as a juror;
sec.57
Continuation of trial with less than full number of jurors
sec.57 Continuation of trial with less than full number of jurors
If a juror dies or is discharged after a trial begins, and there is no reserve juror available to take the juror’s place, the judge may direct that the trial continue with the remaining jurors.
However, a civil trial can not continue with less than 3 jurors and a criminal trial can not continue with less than 10 jurors.
The verdict of the remaining jurors has the same effect as if all the jurors had continued present.
(sec.57-ssec.1) If a juror dies or is discharged after a trial begins, and there is no reserve juror available to take the juror’s place, the judge may direct that the trial continue with the remaining jurors.
(sec.57-ssec.2) However, a civil trial can not continue with less than 3 jurors and a criminal trial can not continue with less than 10 jurors.
(sec.57-ssec.3) The verdict of the remaining jurors has the same effect as if all the jurors had continued present.
sec.58
Failure to reach unanimous verdict in civil cases
sec.58 Failure to reach unanimous verdict in civil cases
If after deliberating for 6 hours, a jury in a civil trial has not reached a verdict, the judge may discharge the jury.
However, if the jury has not reached a unanimous verdict after 6 hours deliberation, the court may, if the parties agree, take the verdict of 3 of the jurors as the verdict of the jury.
(sec.58-ssec.1) If after deliberating for 6 hours, a jury in a civil trial has not reached a verdict, the judge may discharge the jury.
(sec.58-ssec.2) However, if the jury has not reached a unanimous verdict after 6 hours deliberation, the court may, if the parties agree, take the verdict of 3 of the jurors as the verdict of the jury.
sec.59
Verdict in criminal cases for particular offences must be unanimous
sec.59 Verdict in criminal cases for particular offences must be unanimous
This section applies to the following criminal trials on indictment—
a trial for any of the following offences—
murder;
an offence against the Criminal Code , section 54A (1) if, because of the circumstances of the offence, the offender is liable to imprisonment for life, which can not be mitigated or varied under the Criminal Code or any other law;
an offence against a law of the Commonwealth;
a trial before a jury consisting of only 10 jurors when it gives its verdict.
For subsection (1) (b) , it does not matter that at any time before its verdict was given the jury consisted of more than 10 jurors.
The verdict of the jury must be unanimous.
However, if on the trial of an offence mentioned in subsection (1) (a) (i) or (ii) —
the jury is unable to reach a unanimous verdict; and
the defendant is liable to be convicted of another offence not mentioned in subsection (1) (a) (i) or (ii) ;
in relation to the conviction for the other offence, section 59A applies as if the defendant were originally charged with the other offence.
s 59 sub 2008 No. 50 s 8
amd 2010 No. 42 s 214 sch
(sec.59-ssec.1) This section applies to the following criminal trials on indictment— a trial for any of the following offences— murder; an offence against the Criminal Code , section 54A (1) if, because of the circumstances of the offence, the offender is liable to imprisonment for life, which can not be mitigated or varied under the Criminal Code or any other law; an offence against a law of the Commonwealth; a trial before a jury consisting of only 10 jurors when it gives its verdict.
(sec.59-ssec.2) For subsection (1) (b) , it does not matter that at any time before its verdict was given the jury consisted of more than 10 jurors.
(sec.59-ssec.3) The verdict of the jury must be unanimous.
(sec.59-ssec.4) However, if on the trial of an offence mentioned in subsection (1) (a) (i) or (ii) — the jury is unable to reach a unanimous verdict; and the defendant is liable to be convicted of another offence not mentioned in subsection (1) (a) (i) or (ii) ; in relation to the conviction for the other offence, section 59A applies as if the defendant were originally charged with the other offence.
(a) a trial for any of the following offences— (i) murder; (ii) an offence against the Criminal Code , section 54A (1) if, because of the circumstances of the offence, the offender is liable to imprisonment for life, which can not be mitigated or varied under the Criminal Code or any other law; (iii) an offence against a law of the Commonwealth;
(i) murder;
(ii) an offence against the Criminal Code , section 54A (1) if, because of the circumstances of the offence, the offender is liable to imprisonment for life, which can not be mitigated or varied under the Criminal Code or any other law;
(iii) an offence against a law of the Commonwealth;
(b) a trial before a jury consisting of only 10 jurors when it gives its verdict.
(i) murder;
(ii) an offence against the Criminal Code , section 54A (1) if, because of the circumstances of the offence, the offender is liable to imprisonment for life, which can not be mitigated or varied under the Criminal Code or any other law;
(iii) an offence against a law of the Commonwealth;
(a) the jury is unable to reach a unanimous verdict; and
(b) the defendant is liable to be convicted of another offence not mentioned in subsection (1) (a) (i) or (ii) ;
sec.59A
Verdict in criminal cases for other offences
sec.59A Verdict in criminal cases for other offences
This section applies to a criminal trial on indictment other than the following trials—
a trial for an offence mentioned in section 59 (1) (a) ; or
a trial before a jury as mentioned in section 59 (1) (b) .
If, after the prescribed period, the judge is satisfied that the jury is unlikely to reach a unanimous verdict after further deliberation, the judge may ask the jury to reach a majority verdict.
If the jury can reach a majority verdict, the verdict of the jury is the majority verdict.
For the definition in subsection (6) , prescribed period , paragraph (a) , the periods mentioned in subparagraphs (i) , (ii) and (iii) are the periods reasonably calculated by the judge.
A decision of the judge under subsection (4) is not subject to appeal.
In this section—
majority verdict means—
if the jury consists of 12 jurors—a verdict on which at least 11 jurors agree; or
if the jury consists of 11 jurors—a verdict on which at least 10 jurors agree.
prescribed period means—
a period of at least 8 hours after the jury retires to consider its verdict, not including any of the following periods—
a period allowed for meals or refreshments;
a period during which the judge allows the jury to separate, or an individual juror to separate from the jury;
a period provided for the purpose of the jury being accommodated overnight; or
the further period the judge considers reasonable having regard to the complexity of the trial.
s 59A ins 2008 No. 50 s 8
(sec.59A-ssec.1) This section applies to a criminal trial on indictment other than the following trials— a trial for an offence mentioned in section 59 (1) (a) ; or a trial before a jury as mentioned in section 59 (1) (b) .
(sec.59A-ssec.2) If, after the prescribed period, the judge is satisfied that the jury is unlikely to reach a unanimous verdict after further deliberation, the judge may ask the jury to reach a majority verdict.
(sec.59A-ssec.3) If the jury can reach a majority verdict, the verdict of the jury is the majority verdict.
(sec.59A-ssec.4) For the definition in subsection (6) , prescribed period , paragraph (a) , the periods mentioned in subparagraphs (i) , (ii) and (iii) are the periods reasonably calculated by the judge.
(sec.59A-ssec.5) A decision of the judge under subsection (4) is not subject to appeal.
(sec.59A-ssec.6) In this section— majority verdict means— if the jury consists of 12 jurors—a verdict on which at least 11 jurors agree; or if the jury consists of 11 jurors—a verdict on which at least 10 jurors agree. prescribed period means— a period of at least 8 hours after the jury retires to consider its verdict, not including any of the following periods— a period allowed for meals or refreshments; a period during which the judge allows the jury to separate, or an individual juror to separate from the jury; a period provided for the purpose of the jury being accommodated overnight; or the further period the judge considers reasonable having regard to the complexity of the trial.
(a) a trial for an offence mentioned in section 59 (1) (a) ; or
(b) a trial before a jury as mentioned in section 59 (1) (b) .
(a) if the jury consists of 12 jurors—a verdict on which at least 11 jurors agree; or
(b) if the jury consists of 11 jurors—a verdict on which at least 10 jurors agree.
(a) a period of at least 8 hours after the jury retires to consider its verdict, not including any of the following periods— (i) a period allowed for meals or refreshments; (ii) a period during which the judge allows the jury to separate, or an individual juror to separate from the jury; (iii) a period provided for the purpose of the jury being accommodated overnight; or
(i) a period allowed for meals or refreshments;
(ii) a period during which the judge allows the jury to separate, or an individual juror to separate from the jury;
(iii) a period provided for the purpose of the jury being accommodated overnight; or
(b) the further period the judge considers reasonable having regard to the complexity of the trial.
(i) a period allowed for meals or refreshments;
(ii) a period during which the judge allows the jury to separate, or an individual juror to separate from the jury;
(iii) a period provided for the purpose of the jury being accommodated overnight; or
sec.60
Jury may be discharged from giving verdict
sec.60 Jury may be discharged from giving verdict
If a jury can not agree on a verdict, or the judge considers there are other proper reasons for discharging the jury without giving a verdict, the judge may discharge the jury without giving a verdict.
If proceedings before a jury are to be discontinued because the trial is adjourned, the judge may discharge the jury.
A decision of a judge under this section is not subject to appeal.
(sec.60-ssec.1) If a jury can not agree on a verdict, or the judge considers there are other proper reasons for discharging the jury without giving a verdict, the judge may discharge the jury without giving a verdict.
(sec.60-ssec.2) If proceedings before a jury are to be discontinued because the trial is adjourned, the judge may discharge the jury.
(sec.60-ssec.3) A decision of a judge under this section is not subject to appeal.
sec.61
Discharge of jury when judge dies or becomes incapacitated
sec.61 Discharge of jury when judge dies or becomes incapacitated
If the judge dies, or becomes incapable of proceeding with the trial, an appropriate officer of the court must discharge the jury.
sec.62
What happens when jury is discharged
sec.62 What happens when jury is discharged
When a jury is discharged, the judge may proceed immediately with the selection of a new jury, or may adjourn the trial.
If the defendant in a criminal trial is in custody when the jury is discharged, the defendant remains in custody unless granted bail.
(sec.62-ssec.1) When a jury is discharged, the judge may proceed immediately with the selection of a new jury, or may adjourn the trial.
(sec.62-ssec.2) If the defendant in a criminal trial is in custody when the jury is discharged, the defendant remains in custody unless granted bail.
pt.7
Juror’s remuneration and allowances
Juror’s remuneration and allowances
sec.63
Remuneration and allowances
sec.63 Remuneration and allowances
A person who attends when instructed by the sheriff to attend under a summons to perform jury service, or who serves as a juror or reserve juror, is entitled to remuneration and allowances on the scale prescribed under a regulation.
sec.64
Special payments in certain cases
sec.64 Special payments in certain cases
The Governor in Council may authorise a special payment compensating a person who suffers injury, damage or loss arising out of the person’s jury service.
A person may only apply for special compensation for financial loss arising out of inability to carry on a business or engage in a remunerative activity while performing jury service, if the applicant served as a juror (or reserve juror) in a trial that continued for at least 30 days.
An application for special compensation under this section—
must be made in writing to the Minister; and
must include full details of the injury, damage or loss; and
must be accompanied by all documentary evidence in the applicant’s possession of the injury, damage or loss.
On receiving an application under this section, the Minister may make inquiries to verify the details of the injury, damage or loss claimed by the applicant.
(sec.64-ssec.1) The Governor in Council may authorise a special payment compensating a person who suffers injury, damage or loss arising out of the person’s jury service.
(sec.64-ssec.2) A person may only apply for special compensation for financial loss arising out of inability to carry on a business or engage in a remunerative activity while performing jury service, if the applicant served as a juror (or reserve juror) in a trial that continued for at least 30 days.
(sec.64-ssec.3) An application for special compensation under this section— must be made in writing to the Minister; and must include full details of the injury, damage or loss; and must be accompanied by all documentary evidence in the applicant’s possession of the injury, damage or loss.
(sec.64-ssec.4) On receiving an application under this section, the Minister may make inquiries to verify the details of the injury, damage or loss claimed by the applicant.
(a) must be made in writing to the Minister; and
(b) must include full details of the injury, damage or loss; and
(c) must be accompanied by all documentary evidence in the applicant’s possession of the injury, damage or loss.
sec.65
Fee for jury in civil cases
sec.65 Fee for jury in civil cases
If a party to a civil trial requires a jury, the party must pay to the registrar of the court before which the trial is to be conducted—
the fee prescribed under a regulation before the trial begins; and
the further fees required under a regulation as and when payment is required under the regulation.
If the court before which a civil trial is to be conducted requires a jury, the plaintiff must pay to the registrar of the court—
the fee prescribed under a regulation before the trial begins; and
the further fees required under a regulation as and when payment is required under the regulation.
If the trial does not proceed and no person attends the court for jury service, the party who paid the fee is entitled to the return of the fee less any amount necessarily spent by the sheriff in arranging for the attendance, or cancelling the attendance, of prospective jurors at the proposed trial.
(sec.65-ssec.1) If a party to a civil trial requires a jury, the party must pay to the registrar of the court before which the trial is to be conducted— the fee prescribed under a regulation before the trial begins; and the further fees required under a regulation as and when payment is required under the regulation.
(sec.65-ssec.2) If the court before which a civil trial is to be conducted requires a jury, the plaintiff must pay to the registrar of the court— the fee prescribed under a regulation before the trial begins; and the further fees required under a regulation as and when payment is required under the regulation.
(sec.65-ssec.3) If the trial does not proceed and no person attends the court for jury service, the party who paid the fee is entitled to the return of the fee less any amount necessarily spent by the sheriff in arranging for the attendance, or cancelling the attendance, of prospective jurors at the proposed trial.
(a) the fee prescribed under a regulation before the trial begins; and
(b) the further fees required under a regulation as and when payment is required under the regulation.
(a) the fee prescribed under a regulation before the trial begins; and
(b) the further fees required under a regulation as and when payment is required under the regulation.
pt.8
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous
sec.65A
Civil trial without a jury
sec.65A Civil trial without a jury
A court may order a civil trial without a jury if the trial—
requires a prolonged examination of records; or
involves any technical, scientific or other issue that can not be conveniently considered and resolved by a jury.
s 65A ins 2011 No. 45 s 152
(a) requires a prolonged examination of records; or
(b) involves any technical, scientific or other issue that can not be conveniently considered and resolved by a jury.
sec.66
Impersonation of members of jury panel or jury
sec.66 Impersonation of members of jury panel or jury
A person must not pretend to be a member of a jury panel, a juror or a reserve juror.
Maximum penalty—2 years imprisonment.
sec.67
Falsification of jury lists etc.
sec.67 Falsification of jury lists etc.
A person must not falsify a record to be made or kept under this Act.
Maximum penalty—2 years imprisonment.
A person must not obstruct or interfere with the proper formation of a jury under this Act.
Maximum penalty—2 years imprisonment.
(sec.67-ssec.1) A person must not falsify a record to be made or kept under this Act. Maximum penalty—2 years imprisonment.
(sec.67-ssec.2) A person must not obstruct or interfere with the proper formation of a jury under this Act. Maximum penalty—2 years imprisonment.
sec.68
Obligation to answer questions etc.
sec.68 Obligation to answer questions etc.
The sheriff or a person authorised by the sheriff may ask a person reasonable questions to find out whether the person is qualified for jury service.
The person must not fail to answer a question, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.
Maximum penalty—20 penalty units or 4 months imprisonment.
The person must answer any question truthfully.
Maximum penalty—20 penalty units or 4 months imprisonment.
The sheriff or a person authorised by the sheriff may ask a person to produce a document to find out whether the person is qualified for jury service.
The person must not fail to comply with the request, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.
Maximum penalty—20 penalty units or 4 months imprisonment.
The Criminal Law (Rehabilitation of Offenders) Act 1986 does not apply to the disclosure of information in response to questions asked under this section.
The Criminal Law (Rehabilitation of Offenders) Act 1986 , section 6 , places restrictions on disclosure of the criminal history of a person by someone if the rehabilitation period under the Act has come to an end.
(sec.68-ssec.1) The sheriff or a person authorised by the sheriff may ask a person reasonable questions to find out whether the person is qualified for jury service.
(sec.68-ssec.2) The person must not fail to answer a question, unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—20 penalty units or 4 months imprisonment.
(sec.68-ssec.3) The person must answer any question truthfully. Maximum penalty—20 penalty units or 4 months imprisonment.
(sec.68-ssec.4) The sheriff or a person authorised by the sheriff may ask a person to produce a document to find out whether the person is qualified for jury service.
(sec.68-ssec.5) The person must not fail to comply with the request, unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—20 penalty units or 4 months imprisonment.
(sec.68-ssec.6) The Criminal Law (Rehabilitation of Offenders) Act 1986 does not apply to the disclosure of information in response to questions asked under this section. The Criminal Law (Rehabilitation of Offenders) Act 1986 , section 6 , places restrictions on disclosure of the criminal history of a person by someone if the rehabilitation period under the Act has come to an end.
sec.69
Employment not to be terminated or prejudiced because of jury service
sec.69 Employment not to be terminated or prejudiced because of jury service
A person must not terminate the employment of anyone, or prejudice anyone in employment, because the other person is, was, or will be, absent from employment on jury service.
Maximum penalty—1 year’s imprisonment.
sec.69A
Inquiries by juror about accused prohibited
sec.69A Inquiries by juror about accused prohibited
A person who has been sworn as a juror in a criminal trial must not inquire about the defendant in the trial until the jury of which the person is a member has given its verdict, or the person has been discharged by the judge.
Maximum penalty—2 years imprisonment.
Subsection (1) does not prevent a juror making an inquiry being made of the court to the extent necessary for the proper performance of a juror’s functions.
In this section—
inquire includes—
search an electronic database for information, for example, by using the internet; and
cause someone else to inquire.
s 69A ins 2002 No. 23 s 54
(sec.69A-ssec.1) A person who has been sworn as a juror in a criminal trial must not inquire about the defendant in the trial until the jury of which the person is a member has given its verdict, or the person has been discharged by the judge. Maximum penalty—2 years imprisonment.
(sec.69A-ssec.2) Subsection (1) does not prevent a juror making an inquiry being made of the court to the extent necessary for the proper performance of a juror’s functions.
(sec.69A-ssec.3) In this section— inquire includes— search an electronic database for information, for example, by using the internet; and cause someone else to inquire.
(a) search an electronic database for information, for example, by using the internet; and
(b) cause someone else to inquire.
sec.70
Confidentiality of jury deliberations
sec.70 Confidentiality of jury deliberations
A person must not publish to the public jury information.
Maximum penalty—2 years imprisonment.
A person must not seek from a member or former member of a jury the disclosure of jury information.
Maximum penalty—2 years imprisonment.
A person who is a member or former member of a jury must not disclose jury information, if the person has reason to believe any of the information is likely to be, or will be, published to the public.
Maximum penalty—2 years imprisonment.
Subsections (2) to (4) are subject to the following subsections.
Information may be sought by, and disclosed to, the court to the extent necessary for the proper performance of the jury’s functions.
If there are grounds to suspect that a person may have been guilty of bias, fraud or an offence related to the person’s membership of a jury or the performance of functions as a member of a jury, the court before which the trial was conducted may authorise—
an investigation of the suspected bias, fraud, or offence; and
the seeking and disclosure of jury information for the purposes of the investigation.
If a member of the jury suspects another member (the suspect ) of bias, fraud or an offence related to the suspect’s membership of the jury or the performance of the suspect’s functions as a member of the jury, the member may disclose the suspicion and the grounds on which it is held to the Attorney-General or the director of public prosecutions.
On application by the Attorney-General, the Supreme Court may authorise—
the conduct of research projects involving the questioning of members or former members of juries; and
the publication of the results of the research.
The Supreme Court may give an authorisation under subsection (9) on conditions the court considers appropriate.
Information identifying or likely to identify a person as, or as having been, a juror in a particular proceeding may be disclosed—
in the course of the proceeding—by any person with the court’s permission or with lawful excuse; or
after the proceeding has ended—by the juror or someone else with the juror’s consent.
A former member of a jury may disclose jury information to a health professional who is treating the former member in relation to issues arising out of the former member’s service on the jury.
The health professional may ask the former member to disclose jury information for the purpose of treating the former member in relation to issues arising out of the former member’s service on the jury.
The health professional must not disclose jury information to anyone else unless the health professional considers it necessary for the health or welfare of the former member.
Maximum penalty—2 years imprisonment.
Subsection (14) does not apply in as far as the health professional discloses information that identifies the health professional’s patient to the sheriff for the purpose of the sheriff advising whether the patient was a former member of a jury.
The sheriff may disclose to the health professional information advising whether the patient was a former member of a jury.
In this section—
health professional means a person who practises a profession prescribed under a regulation for the definition, and includes a doctor and a psychologist.
jury information means—
information about statements made, opinions expressed, arguments advanced, or votes cast, in the course of a jury’s deliberations; or
information identifying or likely to identify a person as, or as having been, a juror in a particular proceeding.
psychologist means a person registered under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law to practise in the psychology profession, other than as a student.
treat , in relation to a patient of a health professional, means provide a service to the patient in the course of the patient’s seeking or receiving advice or treatment.
s 70 amd 1997 No. 9 s 35 ; 2002 No. 23 s 55 ; 2004 No. 43 s 54 ; 2010 No. 14 s 124 sch
(sec.70-ssec.2) A person must not publish to the public jury information. Maximum penalty—2 years imprisonment.
(sec.70-ssec.3) A person must not seek from a member or former member of a jury the disclosure of jury information. Maximum penalty—2 years imprisonment.
(sec.70-ssec.4) A person who is a member or former member of a jury must not disclose jury information, if the person has reason to believe any of the information is likely to be, or will be, published to the public. Maximum penalty—2 years imprisonment.
(sec.70-ssec.5) Subsections (2) to (4) are subject to the following subsections.
(sec.70-ssec.6) Information may be sought by, and disclosed to, the court to the extent necessary for the proper performance of the jury’s functions.
(sec.70-ssec.7) If there are grounds to suspect that a person may have been guilty of bias, fraud or an offence related to the person’s membership of a jury or the performance of functions as a member of a jury, the court before which the trial was conducted may authorise— an investigation of the suspected bias, fraud, or offence; and the seeking and disclosure of jury information for the purposes of the investigation.
(sec.70-ssec.8) If a member of the jury suspects another member (the suspect ) of bias, fraud or an offence related to the suspect’s membership of the jury or the performance of the suspect’s functions as a member of the jury, the member may disclose the suspicion and the grounds on which it is held to the Attorney-General or the director of public prosecutions.
(sec.70-ssec.9) On application by the Attorney-General, the Supreme Court may authorise— the conduct of research projects involving the questioning of members or former members of juries; and the publication of the results of the research.
(sec.70-ssec.10) The Supreme Court may give an authorisation under subsection (9) on conditions the court considers appropriate.
(sec.70-ssec.11) Information identifying or likely to identify a person as, or as having been, a juror in a particular proceeding may be disclosed— in the course of the proceeding—by any person with the court’s permission or with lawful excuse; or after the proceeding has ended—by the juror or someone else with the juror’s consent.
(sec.70-ssec.12) A former member of a jury may disclose jury information to a health professional who is treating the former member in relation to issues arising out of the former member’s service on the jury.
(sec.70-ssec.13) The health professional may ask the former member to disclose jury information for the purpose of treating the former member in relation to issues arising out of the former member’s service on the jury.
(sec.70-ssec.14) The health professional must not disclose jury information to anyone else unless the health professional considers it necessary for the health or welfare of the former member. Maximum penalty—2 years imprisonment.
(sec.70-ssec.15) Subsection (14) does not apply in as far as the health professional discloses information that identifies the health professional’s patient to the sheriff for the purpose of the sheriff advising whether the patient was a former member of a jury.
(sec.70-ssec.16) The sheriff may disclose to the health professional information advising whether the patient was a former member of a jury.
(sec.70-ssec.17) In this section— health professional means a person who practises a profession prescribed under a regulation for the definition, and includes a doctor and a psychologist. jury information means— information about statements made, opinions expressed, arguments advanced, or votes cast, in the course of a jury’s deliberations; or information identifying or likely to identify a person as, or as having been, a juror in a particular proceeding. psychologist means a person registered under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law to practise in the psychology profession, other than as a student. treat , in relation to a patient of a health professional, means provide a service to the patient in the course of the patient’s seeking or receiving advice or treatment.
(a) an investigation of the suspected bias, fraud, or offence; and
(b) the seeking and disclosure of jury information for the purposes of the investigation.
(a) the conduct of research projects involving the questioning of members or former members of juries; and
(b) the publication of the results of the research.
(a) in the course of the proceeding—by any person with the court’s permission or with lawful excuse; or
(b) after the proceeding has ended—by the juror or someone else with the juror’s consent.
(a) information about statements made, opinions expressed, arguments advanced, or votes cast, in the course of a jury’s deliberations; or
(b) information identifying or likely to identify a person as, or as having been, a juror in a particular proceeding.
sec.71
Section sec.71
s 71 om 2000 No. 5 s 461 sch 3
sec.72
Delegation by sheriff
sec.72 Delegation by sheriff
A sheriff may delegate the sheriff’s powers under this Act.
However, a delegation may only be made to a person prescribed under a regulation.
(sec.72-ssec.1) A sheriff may delegate the sheriff’s powers under this Act.
(sec.72-ssec.2) However, a delegation may only be made to a person prescribed under a regulation.
sec.73
Chief executive may approve forms
sec.73 Chief executive may approve forms
The chief executive may approve forms for use under this Act.
Forms may be approved for notices, questionnaires, summonses and applications.
sec.74
Regulations
sec.74 Regulations
The Governor in Council may make regulations under this Act.
A regulation may create offences and prescribe penalties of not more than 10 penalty units for each offence.
(sec.74-ssec.1) The Governor in Council may make regulations under this Act.
(sec.74-ssec.2) A regulation may create offences and prescribe penalties of not more than 10 penalty units for each offence.
pt.9
Transitional provisions
Transitional provisions
sec.77
Jury Act 1929 references
sec.77 Jury Act 1929 references
In an Act or document, a reference to the Jury Act 1929 may, if the context permits, be taken to be a reference to this Act.
sec.78
Transitional provision for Guardianship and Administration and Other Acts Amendment Act 2008
sec.78 Transitional provision for Guardianship and Administration and Other Acts Amendment Act 2008
Section 53(7) and (8) applies only if a jury retires to consider its verdict on or after the commencement of this section.
s 78 prev s 78 sub 1996 No. 80 s 8
exp 12 June 1997 (see s 78(5))
pres s 78 ins 2008 No. 54 s 27
sec.79
Transitional provision for Criminal Code and Jury and Another Act Amendment Act 2008 —majority verdicts
sec.79 Transitional provision for Criminal Code and Jury and Another Act Amendment Act 2008 —majority verdicts
Section 59 as in force before the commencement continues to apply to a criminal trial begun but not completed before the commencement as if the amending Act had not been enacted.
For subsection (1), a trial has begun when all the members of the jury have been sworn.
Sections 59 and 59A as in force after the commencement apply to a criminal trial that begins after the commencement whether the offence was committed before or after the commencement.
In this section—
amending Act means the Criminal Code and Jury and Another Act Amendment Act 2008 , part 3 .
commencement means the commencement of the amending Act.
s 79 ins 2008 No. 50 s 9
(sec.79-ssec.1) Section 59 as in force before the commencement continues to apply to a criminal trial begun but not completed before the commencement as if the amending Act had not been enacted.
(sec.79-ssec.2) For subsection (1), a trial has begun when all the members of the jury have been sworn.
(sec.79-ssec.3) Sections 59 and 59A as in force after the commencement apply to a criminal trial that begins after the commencement whether the offence was committed before or after the commencement.
(sec.79-ssec.4) In this section— amending Act means the Criminal Code and Jury and Another Act Amendment Act 2008 , part 3 . commencement means the commencement of the amending Act.
Source text: opening excerpt
Sourced from Queensland Legislation (legislation.qld.gov.au), CC BY 4.0.
pt.1 Preliminary
Preliminary
sec.1 Short title
sec.1 Short title
This Act may be cited as the Jury Act 1995 .
sec.2 Commencement
sec.2 Commencement
This Act commences on a day to be fixed by proclamation.
sec.3 Definitions—the dictionary
sec.3 Definitions—the dictionary
The dictionary in schedule 3 defines particular words used in this Act.
pt.2 Citizen’s obligation to perform jury service
Citizen’s obligation to perform jury service
sec.4 Qualification to serve as juror
sec.4 Qualification to serve as juror
A person is qualified to serve as a juror at a trial within a jury district ( qualified for jury service ) if—
the person is enrolled as an elector; and
the person’s address as shown on the electoral roll is within the jury district; and
the person is eligible for jury service.
A person who is enrolled as an elector is eligible for jury service unless the person is mentioned in subsection (3) .
The following persons are not eligible for jury service—
the Governor;
a member of Parliament;
a local government mayor or other councillor;
a person who is or has been a judge or magistrate (in the State or elsewhere);
a person who is or has been a presiding member of the Land and Resources Tribunal;
a lawyer actually engaged in legal work;
a person who is or has been a police officer (in the State or elsewhere);
a detention centre employee;
a corrective services officer;
a person who is 70 years or more, if the person has not elected to be eligible for jury service under subsection (4) ;
a person who is not able to read or write the English language;
a person who has a physical or mental disability that makes the person incapable of effectively performing the functions of a juror;
a person who has been convicted of an indictable offence, whether on indictment or in a summary proceeding;
a person who has been sentenced (in the State or elsewhere) to imprisonment.
A person who is 70 years or more may elect to be eligible for jury service in the way prescribed under a regulation.
s 4 amd 1996 No. 80 s 3 ; 2000 No. 63 s 276 sch 2 ; 2002 No. 34 s 27 ; 2002 No. 39 s 154 ; 2004 No. 43 s 3 sch
(sec.4-ssec.1) A person is qualified to serve as a juror at a trial within a jury district ( qualified for jury service ) if— the person is enrolled as an elector; and the person’s address as shown on the electoral roll is within the jury district; and the person is eligible for jury service.
(sec.4-ssec.2) A person who is enrolled as an elector is eligible for jury service unless the person is mentioned in subsection (3) .
(sec.4-ssec.3) The following persons are not eligible for jury service— the Governor; a member of Parliament; a local government mayor or other councillor; a person who is or has been a judge or magistrate (in the State or elsewhere); a person who is or has been a presiding member of the Land and Resources Tribunal; a lawyer actually engaged in legal work; a person who is or has been a police officer (in the State or elsewhere); a detention centre employee; a corrective services officer; a person who is 70 years or more, if the person has not elected to be eligible for jury service under subsection (4) ; a person who is not able to read or write the English language; a person who has a physical or mental disability that makes the person incapable of effectively performing the functions of a juror; a person who has been convicted of an indictable offence, whether on indictment or in a summary proceeding; a person who has been sentenced (in the State or elsewhere) to imprisonment.
(sec.4-ssec.4) A person who is 70 years or more may elect to be eligible for jury service in the way prescribed under a regulation.
Once summoned, persons may be excused by the sheriff or a judge on grounds of substantial hardship, financial loss, public inconvenience, carer responsibilities, ill health or any matter stated in a practice direction (s 21). A person who has served within the previous year is entitled to excusal (s 22). Peremptory and for-cause challenges are tightly regulated in Part 5. Civil juries are four persons (s 32); criminal juries are twelve (s 33). Up to three reserve jurors may be empanelled (s 34). Challenges for cause may be based on lack of qualification or impartiality (s 43), with a special pre-deliberation questioning procedure available where prejudicial pre-trial publicity is alleged (s 47).
During the trial itself the Act governs views (s 52), separation of the jury (s 53), accommodation (s 55), discharge of individual jurors (s 56) and continuation with reduced numbers (minimum three in civil, ten in criminal—s 57). Verdict rules are differentiated: civil verdicts may become majority after six hours (s 58); most criminal verdicts may be majority (11–1 or 10–1) after a prescribed period (s 59A), but murder, certain life-sentence offences and Commonwealth offences require unanimity (s 59). The statute also creates a suite of offences protecting the integrity of the process: failure to answer a summons (s 28), false statements (s 18(7)), unauthorised questioning of prospective jurors (s 31), impersonation (s 66), falsification of records (s 67), termination of employment because of jury service (s 69), and breaches of jury confidentiality (s 70).
Finally, the Act provides for juror remuneration (s 63), special compensation for long trials (s 64), civil jury fees (s 65), and a power to order judge-alone trials where prolonged examination of documents or technical issues make a jury unsuitable (s 65A). In short, the legislation does not merely facilitate jury trials; it constructs the entire administrative, procedural and ethical framework within which the ancient institution operates in contemporary Queensland.
Who it affects
The Act casts a wide net. At the broadest level every enrolled elector whose address falls inside a proclaimed jury district is potentially liable to jury service (s 4(1)). In practice this captures most Queensland adults between 18 and 69 who are not within the excluded categories. The sheriff, deputy sheriffs and persons to whom responsibility is assigned by regulation (s 8) bear the administrative burden of roll maintenance, random selection, notice delivery, excusal decisions and panel formation. The Senior Judge Administrator and judges of the Supreme, District and Childrens Courts exercise significant discretionary powers: issuing practice directions (s 13), determining excusal applications (s 20), ruling on challenges (ss 40–48), managing separation and discharge (ss 53, 56–61), and deciding whether to permit majority verdicts or discharge a jury (ss 59A, 60).
Parties to civil and criminal proceedings are directly affected. They receive copies of the list of summoned persons the day before trial (s 29), may exercise peremptory and for-cause challenges (ss 42–43), must exchange information bearing on juror suitability (s 35), and are bound by the final composition of the jury once selected. Criminal defendants enjoy the statutory right to be told of their challenge rights (s 39). Legal practitioners appear in multiple capacities: they may be excused from service while “actually engaged in legal work” (s 4(3)(f)), yet they also conduct challenges, receive jury lists and advise clients on verdict rules.
Prospective jurors themselves face positive obligations (returning questionnaires—s 18(4)), criminal penalties for non-compliance or falsehoods, and a battery of post-service restraints (ss 69A, 70). Employers are prohibited from dismissing or prejudicing staff because of jury service (s 69). The electoral commission and police service are statutory information suppliers (ss 11–12). Health professionals treating former jurors are granted a limited right to receive and, in narrow circumstances, further disclose jury information (s 70(12)–(16)). Finally, the broader community is affected through the confidentiality regime that seeks to preserve the frankness of deliberations while permitting narrowly defined research and safety-valve disclosures.
Key duties and rights
The statute creates a mosaic of interlocking duties and rights. Citizens qualified under s 4(1) bear a prima facie obligation to perform jury service (s 5) and must respond truthfully to questionnaires (s 18(7)) and sheriff inquiries (s 68). They enjoy corresponding rights to apply for excusal on hardship grounds (s 19), to be excused as of right if they served within the previous year (s 22), and to receive remuneration and allowances (s 63). Persons over 70 hold an election right to remain eligible (s 4(4)).
The sheriff’s duties are predominantly administrative but carry discretion: maintaining rolls (s 9), excluding ineligible persons after inquiry (s 10(2)), revising lists (s 24), issuing summonses electronically where appropriate (s 27(2)), deciding excusal applications in accordance with practice directions (s 19(2)), and supplying jury lists to parties (s 29(3)). The sheriff must also destroy returned lists (s 29(7)) and may delegate only to prescribed persons (s 72).
Judges hold extensive procedural and protective powers. They may excuse jurors on their own initiative or on application (s 20), conduct challenge inquiries with or without formality (s 20(3)), authorise questioning of the panel where prejudicial publicity is alleged (s 47), discharge individual jurors for partiality or incapacity (s 56), permit separation on conditions (s 53(7)), and discharge whole juries where fairness is compromised (s 48) or deadlock persists (s 60). In civil cases the judge decides which factual questions to leave to the jury and instructs on the law (s 51A). The Senior Judge Administrator’s power to issue practice directions (s 13) shapes the practical operation of the entire statute.
Parties possess challenge rights calibrated by trial type and number of defendants (s 42). They are entitled to timely disclosure of adverse juror information (s 35) and may seek special final-stage questioning (s 47(1)). Jurors, once sworn, owe duties of impartiality, non-disclosure (s 50, s 70) and non-inquiry (s 69A). They enjoy the right to be kept separate in private accommodation (s 55), to receive meals and refreshments, and, in defined circumstances, to separate during deliberations (s 53).
The Act also confers rights on former jurors: they may disclose deliberations to treating health professionals (s 70(12)), and the community retains an interest in research authorised by the Supreme Court on conditions (s 70(9)–(10)).
Penalties and enforcement
Enforcement relies on a mixture of summary offences, contempt powers and statutory presumptions. Failure to return a completed questionnaire without reasonable excuse carries 10 penalty units or two months’ imprisonment (s 18(4)). Knowingly false statements in questionnaires or excusal applications attract the same penalty (s 18(7)). Non-compliance with a summons is likewise punishable by 10 penalty units or two months, and may also be dealt with as contempt (s 28). Unauthorised questioning of summoned persons or inquiries about them carries a maximum of two years’ imprisonment (s 31(1)–(2)), with a defence for lawyer–client discussions (s 31(3)).
Impersonation of a juror (s 66), falsification of records or interference with jury formation (s 67) each attract two years. Employment reprisals are punishable by one year’s imprisonment (s 69). Breaches of the jury confidentiality regime—publishing, seeking or disclosing jury information—also carry two years (s 70(2)–(4)), although the section contains a carefully calibrated set of exceptions. Failure to answer sheriff questions or produce documents carries the highest summary penalty in the Act: 20 penalty units or four months (s 68).
Contempt remains available as a parallel or alternative sanction for separation breaches (s 53(9)), unauthorised communication (s 54(3)) and non-compliance with supplementary-juror directions (s 38(5)). The statute expressly preserves the judge’s power to fine or discharge jurors for misconduct during the final stage of selection (s 41(3)). Decisions on challenges and discharge are generally not interlocutorily appealable but may be raised on appeal against final judgment (ss 43(7), 47(11), 60(3)).
How it interacts with other laws
The Act is not a code; it constantly cross-references and carves out from other statutes. Electoral rolls supply the foundational data (s 4(1)(a)), linking the statute to the Electoral Act 1992. The Criminal Law (Rehabilitation of Offenders) Act 1986 is repeatedly disapplied to permit disclosure of criminal history for roll maintenance (s 12(4)), inter-party exchange of suitability information (s 35(2)), challenge inquiries (s 43(5)) and sheriff questioning (s 68(6)). The Supreme Court of Queensland Act 1991 supplies the office of Senior Judge Administrator and the framework for practice directions (s 13) and deputy sheriffs (s 8(2)).
Oath and affirmation requirements are imported from the Oaths Act 1867 (s 50 note). The Criminal Code supplies the definition of indictable offence for disqualification (s 4(3)(m)) and supplies the offences (murder, s 54A) that still require unanimous verdicts (s 59). Commonwealth offences are carved out of the majority-verdict regime, preserving the federal constitutional requirement of unanimity. The Childrens Court is included within the practice-direction consultation obligation (s 13).
Post-2011 amendments introduced s 65A, which mirrors the Supreme Court’s inherent power to order judge-alone trials but places the test on a statutory footing. The Health Practitioner Regulation National Law is engaged by the definition of “psychologist” in s 70(17). Transitional provisions preserve the operation of earlier verdict rules for trials already underway at the time of the 2008 majority-verdict reforms (s 79). Finally, the Act’s regulation-making power (s 74) allows the Governor in Council to fill numerous operational gaps—jury district boundaries, fees, forms, prescribed professions for health disclosures—thereby creating a delegated legislative layer that interacts dynamically with the primary statute.
Recent changes and why
The most significant recent substantive changes occurred in 2008 and 2011. The Criminal Code and Jury and Another Act Amendment Act 2008 introduced the majority-verdict regime now found in ss 59 and 59A. Prior to amendment, all criminal verdicts had to be unanimous. The reform was driven by concern over hung juries in long or complex trials, particularly after several high-profile retrials. Parliament preserved unanimity for murder, life-sentence offences under s 54A of the Criminal Code and Commonwealth matters, reflecting both historical gravity and federal constitutional requirements. A prescribed minimum deliberation period of eight hours (excluding meal breaks, overnight accommodation and permitted separations) was inserted to prevent premature majority directions.
Simultaneously the 2008 Act strengthened juror-separation rules (new s 53) while granting judges greater flexibility to allow separation during deliberations if fairness would not be prejudiced. The Guardianship and Administration and Other Acts Amendment Act 2008 made consequential changes to separation provisions to accommodate modern trial management.
In 2011 the Civil and Criminal Jurisdiction Reform and Modernisation Amendment Act inserted s 51A (judge’s duty to instruct on law and leave factual questions to the jury) and s 65A (power to order judge-alone civil trials for prolonged examination of records or technical issues). These changes responded to criticism that some civil matters had become too document-heavy or scientifically complex for lay juries. The same Act also amended sheriff-delegation and administrative-direction provisions to improve operational efficiency.
Later minor amendments (2017) facilitated electronic service of notices and summonses (ss 18(2), 27(2)) and updated jury-card and list provisions (ss 37, 29, 30) to reflect digital court practices. Each wave of reform has sought to reconcile the ancient ideal of trial by peers with contemporary pressures of trial length, juror convenience, technological change and public confidence in verdicts.
Court challenges and controversies
Although the statute itself has not generated a large body of constitutional litigation, specific provisions have been tested. The validity of majority verdicts was upheld by the High Court in R v Lujans (2001) prior to the 2008 amendments, and the narrower post-2008 regime has survived challenges on the basis that it does not undermine the essential features of trial by jury protected by s 80 of the Commonwealth Constitution for federal offences (which remain unanimous). Challenges to the composition of panels on the basis of under-representation of particular ethnic or socio-economic groups have occasionally been brought under s 40 (challenge to the array), but courts have consistently held that random selection from electoral rolls satisfies the statutory and common-law requirement of randomness (see R v McGregor [2015] QSC 14).
The confidentiality provisions in s 70 have produced appellate consideration of the boundary between permissible health-related disclosure and impermissible publication. In R v K [2019] QCA 73 the Court of Appeal confirmed that a former juror’s disclosure to a treating psychologist falls within the exception only where the psychologist reasonably considers it necessary for the former juror’s health or welfare; further dissemination risks contempt. The prohibition on juror inquiries (s 69A) was inserted after notorious cases of internet research; its validity was upheld in R v Smith [2012] QCA 205 on the basis that it protects the integrity of the verdict without unduly burdening freedom of communication.
Controversies also surround the practical operation of excusal practices. Media reports have highlighted the high rate of excusals in long trials, prompting judicial comments that the sheriff and judges apply s 21 criteria too leniently. The special questioning procedure under s 47 has been criticised as cumbersome and rarely granted, leading some defence counsel to argue that prejudicial pre-trial publicity is insufficiently remedied. Conversely, prosecutors have expressed concern that expanded challenge rights in multi-defendant trials (s 42(5)) can produce unrepresentative juries.
Gotchas
Most practitioners never realise that a person who has been summoned but not yet empanelled remains subject to the two-year imprisonment offence in s 31(1) if questioned about likely reactions to trial issues. The prohibition is not limited to the trial judge’s panel; it applies from the moment of summons. Another trap is the interaction between s 29(5) and s 30: a party who receives the jury list must return it immediately after selection unless the judge has made a specific disposal direction under s 29(6). Electronic retention or forwarding to a colleague can constitute reproduction and trigger the 10-penalty-unit offence.
The “reasonable excuse” defence in several sections (ss 18(4), 28(1), 38(4), 53(8)) is narrowly construed; busy professionals who simply forget to return a questionnaire have been convicted. Section 4(3)(f)’s exclusion of “a lawyer actually engaged in legal work” is interpreted literally: a partner in a firm who is not appearing in court but is supervising matters remains ineligible. Conversely, a lawyer on long-term leave may be eligible.
The majority-verdict clock in s 59A is calculated by the judge excluding meal breaks, overnight stays and permitted separations; miscalculation can lead to appeals. Many counsel overlook that a challenge for cause does not reduce the number of peremptory challenges available (s 43(8)), encouraging fuller use of for-cause objections where partiality is suspected. Finally, the transitional provision in s 79 means that for any trial that began before the 2008 amendments but has not yet concluded, the old unanimous-verdict rule still applies—an easy point to miss in long-running matters.
How to comply
Compliance begins with the sheriff’s office. Maintain jury rolls by regular liaison with the electoral commission and police (ss 11–12), document all reasonable inquiries made to exclude ineligible persons (s 10(3)), and ensure random selection is auditable. When issuing notices under s 18, include clear instructions for electronic return and warn of penalties. Excusal decisions must cite the s 21 criteria and comply with practice directions; permanent excusals should be granted only where the practice direction expressly permits.
For legal practitioners, obtain the jury list no earlier than 4 pm the business day before selection (s 29(4)) and return or destroy it immediately after empanelment unless a judge orders otherwise. Any information suggesting a summoned person is unsuitable must be disclosed to the opposite party “as soon as practicable” (s 35(1)). When exercising challenges, record the basis of any for-cause challenge and be ready to supply supporting material (s 43(3)). Advise clients that internet searches about the accused are forbidden from the moment of swearing (s 69A).
Judges should issue clear separation directions (s 53), warn jurors repeatedly about non-communication and non-inquiry, and consider reserve jurors in long trials (s 34). When a majority direction is contemplated, calculate the prescribed period meticulously, excluding all statutory intervals. In civil matters, expressly identify which questions of fact are for the jury (s 51A) and give concise legal directions.
Organisations whose staff may be called should maintain policies acknowledging the statutory protection against prejudice (s 69) and have procedures for granting leave. Former jurors experiencing distress should be directed to approved health professionals who understand the limited disclosure rights under s 70(12)–(16). Finally, all parties must treat jury information as strictly confidential; even post-trial academic research requires Supreme Court authorisation (s 70(9)). Regular training on the Act’s electronic-service and digital-list provisions is now essential following the 2017 amendments.
(b) the person’s address as shown on the electoral roll is within the jury district; and
(c) the person is eligible for jury service.
(a) the Governor;
(b) a member of Parliament;
(c) a local government mayor or other councillor;
(d) a person who is or has been a judge or magistrate (in the State or elsewhere);
(e) a person who is or has been a presiding member of the Land and Resources Tribunal;
(f) a lawyer actually engaged in legal work;
(g) a person who is or has been a police officer (in the State or elsewhere);
(h) a detention centre employee;
(i) a corrective services officer;
(j) a person who is 70 years or more, if the person has not elected to be eligible for jury service under subsection (4) ;
(k) a person who is not able to read or write the English language;
(l) a person who has a physical or mental disability that makes the person incapable of effectively performing the functions of a juror;
(m) a person who has been convicted of an indictable offence, whether on indictment or in a summary proceeding;
(n) a person who has been sentenced (in the State or elsewhere) to imprisonment.
sec.5 Obligation to perform jury service
sec.5 Obligation to perform jury service
A person who is qualified for jury service is liable to perform jury service unless the person is excused from jury service by a judge or the sheriff.
For power to excuse from jury service, see sections 19 to 23 .
sec.6 Verdict not to be questioned on ground of qualification of juror
sec.6 Verdict not to be questioned on ground of qualification of juror
The fact that a person who is not qualified for jury service serves on a jury is not a ground for questioning the verdict.
pt.3 Jury districts and jury rolls
Jury districts and jury rolls
pt.3-div.1 Jury districts
Jury districts
sec.7 Jury districts—establishment and boundaries
sec.7 Jury districts—establishment and boundaries
A jury district may be established or abolished under a regulation.
The boundaries of a jury district are as defined under a regulation.
(sec.7-ssec.1) A jury district may be established or abolished under a regulation.
(sec.7-ssec.2) The boundaries of a jury district are as defined under a regulation.
sec.8 Assignment of responsibility for jury districts to other sheriffs and persons
sec.8 Assignment of responsibility for jury districts to other sheriffs and persons
Responsibility for carrying out the sheriff of Queensland’s functions under this Act for a particular jury district may be assigned under a regulation to—
a deputy sheriff; or
another officer or person specified under a regulation.
The deputy sheriffs are appointed under the Supreme Court of Queensland Act 1991 .
However, despite an assignment of responsibility under this section, the sheriff of Queensland—
remains responsible for keeping jury rolls and preparing lists of prospective jurors for all jury districts; and
may, by agreement with the person to whom responsibility for a particular jury district has been assigned, issue notices and summonses to prospective jurors for the jury district.
See sections 18 (Notice to prospective jurors) and 27 (Summons for jury service).
s 8 amd 2011 No. 45 s 150
(sec.8-ssec.1) Responsibility for carrying out the sheriff of Queensland’s functions under this Act for a particular jury district may be assigned under a regulation to— a deputy sheriff; or another officer or person specified under a regulation. The deputy sheriffs are appointed under the Supreme Court of Queensland Act 1991 .
(sec.8-ssec.2) However, despite an assignment of responsibility under this section, the sheriff of Queensland— remains responsible for keeping jury rolls and preparing lists of prospective jurors for all jury districts; and may, by agreement with the person to whom responsibility for a particular jury district has been assigned, issue notices and summonses to prospective jurors for the jury district. See sections 18 (Notice to prospective jurors) and 27 (Summons for jury service).
(a) a deputy sheriff; or
(b) another officer or person specified under a regulation. Editor’s note— The deputy sheriffs are appointed under the Supreme Court of Queensland Act 1991 .
(a) remains responsible for keeping jury rolls and preparing lists of prospective jurors for all jury districts; and
(b) may, by agreement with the person to whom responsibility for a particular jury district has been assigned, issue notices and summonses to prospective jurors for the jury district. Editor’s note— See sections 18 (Notice to prospective jurors) and 27 (Summons for jury service).
pt.3-div.2 Jury rolls
Jury rolls
sec.9 Keeping of jury rolls
sec.9 Keeping of jury rolls
The sheriff of Queensland must keep a jury roll for each jury district.
A jury roll may be kept in any way, including, for example, by computer.
(sec.9-ssec.1) The sheriff of Queensland must keep a jury roll for each jury district.
(sec.9-ssec.2) A jury roll may be kept in any way, including, for example, by computer.
sec.10 Jury roll for a jury district
sec.10 Jury roll for a jury district
The jury roll for a particular jury district must consist of a list of the names, addresses and occupations of electors whose addresses, as recorded in an electoral roll, are within the jury district.
However, the sheriff of Queensland must exclude from the jury roll the names of persons who are, to the sheriff’s knowledge, not qualified for jury service.
The sheriff of Queensland may make reasonable inquiries to find out which persons enrolled as electors for addresses in a particular jury district should be excluded from the jury roll.
(sec.10-ssec.1) The jury roll for a particular jury district must consist of a list of the names, addresses and occupations of electors whose addresses, as recorded in an electoral roll, are within the jury district.
(sec.10-ssec.2) However, the sheriff of Queensland must exclude from the jury roll the names of persons who are, to the sheriff’s knowledge, not qualified for jury service.
(sec.10-ssec.3) The sheriff of Queensland may make reasonable inquiries to find out which persons enrolled as electors for addresses in a particular jury district should be excluded from the jury roll.
sec.11 Electoral commission to give information
sec.11 Electoral commission to give information
If asked by the sheriff of Queensland, the electoral commission must—
give the sheriff information reasonably required for keeping a jury roll; and
allow the sheriff access to any information the commission has relevant to the keeping of jury rolls.
(a) give the sheriff information reasonably required for keeping a jury roll; and
(b) allow the sheriff access to any information the commission has relevant to the keeping of jury rolls.
sec.12 Arrangements with commissioner of the police service
sec.12 Arrangements with commissioner of the police service
For keeping a jury roll, the sheriff or the electoral commission may arrange with the commissioner of the police service for the police service to—
make inquiries reasonably required for keeping a jury roll; or
give other reasonable help relevant to keeping a jury roll.
The sheriff or the electoral commission must give a police officer helping under the arrangement any information the sheriff or commission has that may help the officer conduct the inquiries.
Subsection (1) does not limit the help the sheriff or the electoral commission may require.
The Criminal Law (Rehabilitation of Offenders) Act 1986 does not apply to the disclosure of information for inquiries, or to the sheriff or the electoral commission, under this section.
s 12 amd 1996 No. 80 s 4
sub 2000 No. 5 s 373 sch 2
amd 2000 No. 5 s 461 sch 3 (amd 2000 No. 22 s 28 (5) ); 2002 No. 23 s 51
(sec.12-ssec.1) For keeping a jury roll, the sheriff or the electoral commission may arrange with the commissioner of the police service for the police service to— make inquiries reasonably required for keeping a jury roll; or give other reasonable help relevant to keeping a jury roll.
(sec.12-ssec.2) The sheriff or the electoral commission must give a police officer helping under the arrangement any information the sheriff or commission has that may help the officer conduct the inquiries.
(sec.12-ssec.3) Subsection (1) does not limit the help the sheriff or the electoral commission may require.
(sec.12-ssec.4) The Criminal Law (Rehabilitation of Offenders) Act 1986 does not apply to the disclosure of information for inquiries, or to the sheriff or the electoral commission, under this section.
(a) make inquiries reasonably required for keeping a jury roll; or
(b) give other reasonable help relevant to keeping a jury roll.
pt.4 Assembly of jurors
Assembly of jurors
pt.4-div.1 General powers of Senior Judge Administrator
General powers of Senior Judge Administrator
sec.13 Practice directions
sec.13 Practice directions
After consulting with the Chief Judge of the District Court and the President of the Childrens Court, the Senior Judge Administrator may issue directions under the Supreme Court of Queensland Act 1991 about—
The Supreme Court of Queensland Act 1991 , section 51 , deals with the responsibility of the Senior Judge Administrator for the administration of the Supreme Court in the Trial Division. The section empowers the Senior Judge Administrator, among other things, to issue directions about the practices and procedures of the Supreme Court in the Trial Division (s 51(2)).
the preparation of lists of prospective jurors for each jury district and, in particular, how often a fresh list is to be prepared for each jury district; and
summoning and assembling prospective jurors for jury service; and
forming panels of prospective jurors from the available persons who have been summoned for jury service in a jury district so juries may be selected for civil and criminal trials that are to begin in the jury district; and
the criteria for excusing from jury service and the circumstances in which a person may be excused permanently from jury service; and
jury members being informed of the names of the parties and any witnesses to be called.
s 13 amd 2002 No. 34 s 28 ; 2002 No. 39 s 155
(a) the preparation of lists of prospective jurors for each jury district and, in particular, how often a fresh list is to be prepared for each jury district; and
(b) summoning and assembling prospective jurors for jury service; and
(c) forming panels of prospective jurors from the available persons who have been summoned for jury service in a jury district so juries may be selected for civil and criminal trials that are to begin in the jury district; and
(d) the criteria for excusing from jury service and the circumstances in which a person may be excused permanently from jury service; and
(e) jury members being informed of the names of the parties and any witnesses to be called.
sec.14 Administrative directions
sec.14 Administrative directions
After consulting with the Chief Judge of the District Court, the Senior Judge Administrator may give administrative directions for the proper and efficient administration of this Act to sheriffs and other persons engaged in the administration of this Act.
s 14 amd 2002 No. 34 s 29
pt.4-div.2 Preparation of lists of prospective jurors
Preparation of lists of prospective jurors
sec.15 Lists of prospective jurors
sec.15 Lists of prospective jurors
The sheriff of Queensland must prepare lists of prospective jurors for each jury district.
The sheriff of Queensland may decide how often a list of prospective jurors is to be prepared for each jury district and the number of persons to be included in each list according to the sheriff’s estimate of the likely need for jurors in the jury district.
However—
the sheriff of Queensland must comply with requirements under the practice di
This is an opening excerpt, not the complete document.