Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017

1 Short title This Act may be cited as the Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017.

2 Commencement This Act commences on the day fixed by the Administrator by Gazette notice.

3 Object of Act and how object to be achieved (1) The object of this Act is to address wrongdoing in, or connected with, public administration by: (a) preventing or minimising the occurrence of improper conduct; and (b) improving public confidence that improper conduct will be detected and dealt with appropriately; and (c) providing mechanisms to deal with improper conduct when it occurs. (2) This Act achieves its object: (a) primarily by establishing the ICAC; and (b) by conferring functions in relation to improper conduct on the ICAC and on referral entities; and

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 2 (c) by providing incentives and reducing disincentives to persons, to assist in the detection, reporting, investigation, prosecution and prevention of improper conduct; and (d) by protecting persons who put themselves at risk of harm by exposing or reporting improper conduct; and (e) by requiring the ICAC to help public bodies to prevent, and to identify and deal effectively and appropriately with, improper conduct. (3) For subsection (2)(a), the primary purpose of establishing the ICAC is to augment the Territory's existing framework for responding to improper conduct by providing for the ICAC to: (a) investigate the most serious, systemic and sensitive improper (b) ensure that other improper conduct is dealt with, either by an appropriate existing entity or, if the ICAC considers it appropriate, by the ICAC; and (c) coordinate a response to improper conduct when multiple entities have jurisdiction in relation to the matter; and (d) refer information and evidence for the prosecution of offences involving improper conduct. (4) This Act: (a) primarily empowers the ICAC to investigate cases of corrupt conduct and anti-democratic conduct; and (b) empowers the ICAC to refer cases of misconduct and unsatisfactory conduct to referral entities to investigate. Note for section 3 For improper conduct – see section 9.

4 Definitions In this Act: Acting ICAC means a person appointed under section 121(1) or (2). acting in an official capacity, in relation to a person, means the person is performing functions under, or otherwise related to the administration of, this Act.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 3 anti-democratic conduct, see section 15. Assembly Committee means the committee (if any) designated under section 5. associated entity, see section 176 of the Electoral Act 2004. Australian parliament means: (a) the Legislative Assembly; or (b) the Parliament of the Commonwealth or a State; or (c) the parliament or legislature of another Territory. authorised officer means: (b) a person appointed as an authorised officer under section 131. breach of public trust, see section 13. claimant, for Part 5, Division 2, see section 84. claimant's representative, for Part 5, Division 2, see section 84. Clerk, for Part 5, Division 2, see section 84. closed session, for Part 5, Division 1, see section 78. conduct means an act or an omission to perform an act. conflict of interest, see section 10(6). connected to public affairs, in relation to conduct, means: (a) conduct in the course of, or closely related to, the performance of official functions, including conduct engaged in otherwise than in the performance of official functions that adversely affects or could adversely affect, directly or indirectly, the honest, impartial or effective performance of those functions; or (b) conduct that affects the use, allocation or receipt of public resources to which a public officer has access in connection with being a public officer; or

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 4 (c) conduct involving the use of authority or perceived authority that a person has as a result of being a public officer or representing themselves as a public officer. corrupt conduct, see section 10. eligible person: (a) for appointment as the ICAC – see section 114(1); or (b) for appointment as the Inspector – see section 134(2). engage in conduct means: (a) perform an act; or (b) omit to perform an act. engage in retaliation, see section 95. examination means an examination under section 34 for an investigation. function includes duty and power. general report, see section 48(1). give evidence includes answer a question, give information and produce an item. (a) generally – includes any of the following: (i) injury, loss or damage; (ii) intimidation or harassment; (iii) discrimination, disadvantage or adverse treatment (including disciplinary action), in relation to employment, career, profession, trade or business; or (b) for protection of protected persons – see section 112(4). health practitioner means: (a) a medical practitioner; or (b) a person registered under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law to practise in the psychology profession (other than as a student).

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 5 ICAC means the Independent Commissioner Against Corruption established by section 17. ICAC Minister means the minister administering this Act. ICAC premises means premises occupied by the ICAC, the ICAC's Office or a member of ICAC staff in connection with the performance of official functions. ICAC's Office means the Agency of that name specified in

Schedule 1 to the Public Sector Employment and Management Act 1993. identifying information means information identifying, or tending to identify, a protected person. improper conduct, see section 9. independent entity means any of the following: (a) the Speaker; (b) the Deputy Speaker; (c) a court; (ca) the Judicial Commission; (d) a judicial officer; (e) a board, commission, tribunal or other body established under an Act that has judicial or quasi-judicial functions in the performance of its deliberative functions; (f) a member of an entity mentioned in paragraph (e); (g) a coroner; (h) the Director of Public Prosecutions; (i) the Auditor-General; (j) the Ombudsman; (k) the Anti-Discrimination Commissioner; (l) the Children's Commissioner; (m) the Electoral Commissioner;

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 6 (n) the Commissioner of Police in relation to a referral if: (i) the matter referred does not involve an allegation of corrupt conduct of a police officer or a person employed or engaged by the Commissioner of Police; or (ii) the matter referred involves an allegation of improper conduct of a police officer or a person employed or engaged by the Commissioner of Police and the ICAC considers the ICAC has no good reason to maintain oversight of the matter; (o) a law enforcement agency of another jurisdiction; (p) an agency of another Australian jurisdiction that has functions similar to those of the ICAC; (q) an entity prescribed, or of a class prescribed, by regulation. Inspector means the Inspector appointed under section 134(1). investigation means an investigation under Part 3, Division 5 including a joint investigation under section 38. investigation report, see section 50(1). irrelevant criminal record, see section 4(1) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1992. item means a document or other thing. judicial officer means any of the following: (a) a Supreme Court Judge; (b) a Local Court Judge; (c) an Associate Judge; (d) a judicial officer acting as a coroner; (e) a judicial officer performing duties as the President or Deputy President of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal. law enforcement agency means an entity, in the Territory or elsewhere in Australia, that has functions in relation to the investigation of offences or the prosecution of persons for offences. local councillor means a member of a local government council.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 7 member of ICAC staff means a person mentioned in section 123(1). member of Inspector staff means a person mentioned in section 142(1). misconduct, see section 11. misleading information means information that is misleading in a material particular or because of the omission of a material particular. MLA means member of the Legislative Assembly. nominated recipient, see section 97. non-disclosure direction means a direction under section 147. non-NT political party, for Part 7, see section 112A(1). occurs, in relation to conduct, means the conduct is engaged in. official information means information known to, or held by or on behalf of, a public officer or public body in relation to official functions, whether the information: (a) has or has not been recorded; or (b) is held alone or jointly with another person or body; or (c) is in the Territory or elsewhere. open session, for Part 5, Division 1, see section 78. parliamentary privilege, see section 83. perform a function includes exercise a power. political opinion, affiliation or activity has the same meaning as in the Anti-Discrimination Act 1992. political party, see section 3 of the Electoral Act 2004. premises includes: (a) land; and (b) a permanent or temporary building or structure on land; and (c) an aircraft, vehicle or vessel.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 8 prohibited reason, in relation to retaliation, see section 95(2). proper officer, for Part 5, Division 2, see section 84. protected action, see section 92. protected communication, see section 93. protected person: (a) generally – means a person who takes or has taken protected action; and (b) for retaliation – includes a person whom the person engaging in retaliation believes or suspects is taking or has taken protected action. public body, see section 16(1). public inquiry means an inquiry under Part 3, Division 6. public officer, see section 16(2). public resources, see section 14. public statement means a statement by the ICAC under section 55. recent political affiliation, for Part 7, see section 112A(2). referral means a referral of a matter by the ICAC under Part 3, Division 4. referral entity means any person or body identified in section 25 or 25A to whom or to which a matter may be referred. report concerning recommendations means a report by the ICAC under section 58. reportable donation, for Part 7, see section 112A(1). representation, for Part 5, Division 1, see section 78. responsible Minister, for a public body or public officer, means the minister having responsibility for the area or activity of government that is applicable to the public body or public officer. Note for definition responsible Minister See section 19(3) of the Interpretation Act 1978. retaliation, see section 95.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 9 retention notice, see section 71(1)(e). search warrant, means a search warrant issued under section 68. secured item, for Part 5, Division 2, see section 84. subject of privilege, for Part 5, Division 2, see section 85. superior Court means: (a) the Supreme Court; or (b) a Supreme Court of a State or another Territory; or (c) the High Court of Australia; or (d) the Federal Court of Australia. unsatisfactory conduct, see section 12. victim, in relation to retaliation, see section 95. Note for section 4 The Interpretation Act 1978 contains definitions and other provisions that may be relevant to this Act.

5 Assembly Committee The Legislative Assembly may, by resolution, designate a committee of the Legislative Assembly to receive reports, and perform other functions, in relation to the ICAC.

6 Act binds Crown This Act binds the Crown in right of the Territory and, to the extent the legislative power of the Legislative Assembly permits, the Crown in all its other capacities.

7 Application of Criminal Code Part IIAA of the Criminal Code applies to an offence against this Act. Note for section 7 Part IIAA of the Criminal Code states the general principles of criminal responsibility, establishes general defences, and deals with burden of proof. It also defines, or elaborates on, certain concepts commonly used in the creation of offences.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 10

8 Meaning of conduct (1) Without limiting the conduct to which this Act applies, this Act extends to the following: (a) conduct occurring before the commencement of this Act; (b) conduct occurring outside the Territory; (c) conduct engaged in: (i) by a person who was a public officer at the time it was engaged in but who has since ceased to be a public (ii) by an entity that was a public body at the time it was engaged in but that has since ceased to be a public body or has ceased to exist. (2) A public body engages in conduct if: (a) the conduct is engaged in by a person or body with the authority to act on behalf of the public body; or (b) the conduct occurs and a person or body with the authority to act on behalf of the public body expressly, tacitly or impliedly authorises or permits it to occur; or (c) the conduct occurs and a corporate culture exists in the public body that directs, encourages, tolerates or leads to it occurring; or (d) the conduct occurs and the public body has failed to create and maintain a corporate culture to deter or prevent it occurring. Note for section 8 See also section 4, definitions conduct, engage in conduct and occurs.

9 Meaning of improper conduct (1) Each of the following is improper conduct: (a) corrupt conduct; (b) misconduct; (c) unsatisfactory conduct;

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 11 (d) anti-democratic conduct; (e) conduct constituting an offence against this Act; (f) conduct (the secondary conduct) engaged in by any person in relation to conduct mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (e) (the primary conduct) as provided by subsection (2). (2) For subsection (1)(f), secondary conduct is conduct that would constitute an offence against one of the following sections of the Criminal Code on the assumption that the primary conduct is an offence, whether or not the primary conduct is in fact an offence: (a) section 43BF (attempt); (b) section 43BG (complicity and common purpose); (c) section 43BH (innocent agency); (d) section 43BI (incitement); (e) section 43BJ (conspiracy). (3) Secondary conduct is taken to be the same type of improper conduct as the primary conduct to which it relates. Examples for section 9 1 An attempt to engage in corrupt conduct would be improper conduct, whether or not the corrupt conduct is itself an offence. 2 An attempt to engage in corrupt conduct would also be corrupt conduct. 10 Meaning of corrupt conduct (1) Conduct is corrupt conduct if it is conduct engaged in by a public officer (whether or not the identity of the public officer is known) or by a public body: (a) that constitutes an offence, whether in the Territory or elsewhere, for which the maximum penalty is imprisonment for a term of at least 2 years, with or without a fine; and (b) that is connected to public affairs. Note for subsection (1)(b) See section 4, definition connected to public affairs.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 12 (2) Conduct is also corrupt conduct if it is conduct engaged in by a public officer (whether or not the identity of the public officer is known): (a) that constitutes reasonable grounds for dismissing or terminating the services of the public officer; and (c) that involves or results in any of the following: (i) dishonesty; (ii) failure to manage adequately an actual or perceived conflict of interest; (iii) a breach of public trust; (iv) the illegal, unauthorised or otherwise inappropriate performance of official functions; (v) inappropriate conduct in relation to official information; (vi) an adverse effect on the honest, impartial or effective performance of official functions by any public officer or public body or group of public officers or public bodies. (3) Conduct is also corrupt conduct if it is conduct engaged in by a public body, a minister, an MLA or a local councillor: (a) that is connected to public affairs; and (b) that involves a serious breach of public trust by the public body, minister, MLA or councillor. (4) Conduct is also corrupt conduct if it is conduct engaged in by a person (whether or not a public officer or public body) that could impair public confidence in public administration and that involves any of the following: (a) collusive tendering; (b) intentionally or recklessly providing false or misleading information in relation to an application for a licence, permit or other authority under an Act; (c) misappropriating or misusing public resources; (d) assisting in, or dishonestly benefitting from, the misappropriation or misuse of public resources;

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 13 (e) dishonestly obtaining or retaining employment or appointment as a public officer. (5) Conduct is also corrupt conduct if it is conduct engaged in by a person (whether or not a public officer or public body) that constitutes: (a) an offence against Part IV, Divisions 1 to 5 of the Criminal Code; or (b) an offence against section 118 or 119 of the Criminal Code; or (c) an offence: (i) that adversely affects, directly or indirectly, the honest, impartial or effective performance of official functions by any public officer or public body or group of public officers or public bodies; and (ii) that is prescribed by regulation. (6) For subsection (2)(c)(ii), conflict of interest includes the obtaining of a benefit by, or the causing of a detriment to, a person or body, including: (a) any benefit or detriment, whether pecuniary or otherwise; and (b) placing the person or body in a stronger or weaker position in relation to a reasonably foreseeable future benefit or detriment. (7) For subsection (4), in determining whether conduct could impair public confidence in public administration it is irrelevant whether or not the conduct is likely to become public knowledge.

11 Meaning of misconduct (1) Conduct is misconduct if it is conduct engaged in by a public officer (whether or not the identity of the public officer is known) or by a public body: (a) that constitutes an offence, whether in the Territory or elsewhere, for which the maximum penalty is: (i) a fine; or (ii) imprisonment for a term of less than 2 years, with or without a fine; and

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 14 (b) that is connected to public affairs. Note for subsection (1)(b) See section 4, definition connected to public affairs. (2) Conduct is also misconduct if it is conduct engaged in by a public officer other than a judicial officer (whether or not the identity of the public officer is known): (a) that constitutes reasonable grounds for taking disciplinary action against the officer (short of dismissal or termination of appointment) or varying the terms of the officer's appointment; and (c) that is conduct mentioned in section 10(2)(c). (3) Conduct is also misconduct if it is conduct engaged in by a judicial officer, the Director of Public Prosecutions, a public body, a minister, an MLA or a local councillor: (a) that is connected to public affairs; and (b) that involves: (i) for a judicial officer or the Director of Public Prosecutions – a breach of public trust; or (ii) for a public body, minister, MLA or councillor – a breach of public trust not amounting to a serious breach of public trust.

12 Meaning of unsatisfactory conduct (1) Conduct is unsatisfactory conduct if it is conduct engaged in by a public officer (whether or not the identity of the public officer is known) or by a public body: (a) that involves: (i) illegality or impropriety; or (ii) negligence; or (iii) incompetence; and

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 15 (c) that results in: (i) substantial mismanagement of public resources; or (ii) the inappropriate or significantly inefficient use of public resources; or (iii) substantial mismanagement in relation to the performance of official functions; or (iv) substantial detriment to the public interest. (2) For subsection (1)(a)(iii), incompetence: (a) is conduct that would not be engaged in by a reasonable public officer or public body: (i) having the skills and knowledge reasonably expected of a person or body with the role of the public officer or public body; and (ii) having taken appropriate steps to obtain adequate resources, information and advice; but (b) does not include conduct: (i) that is less than best practice; or (ii) that is a matter of policy about which reasonable public officers or public bodies may disagree. (3) Despite subsection (1), unsatisfactory conduct does not include any conduct engaged in by a judicial officer in the performance of judicial functions.

13 Meaning of breach of public trust (1) Breach of public trust means conduct by a public body or public officer that is intentionally or recklessly inconsistent with the functions of the body or officer, including the duty of the body or officer to act in the public interest. (2) If a public body is a public body of a kind mentioned in section 16(1)(l), a breach of public trust can only occur if the conduct affects the use of public resources or the carrying out of functions on behalf of the Territory, another public body or a public (3) If a public officer is a public officer of a public body of a kind mentioned in section 16(1)(l), a breach of public trust can only

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 16 occur if the conduct affects the use of public resources or the carrying out of functions on behalf of the Territory, another public body or a public officer.

14 Meaning of public resources (1) Public resources means: (a) money, assets and infrastructure of the Territory or a public body; or (b) intellectual property of, and licences held by, the Territory or a public body; or (c) human resources of the Territory or a public body or public (d) any other resources of, or available to, the Territory or a public body or public officer, including resources held under trust. (2) If a public body is a public body of a kind mentioned in section 16(1)(l), the resources of that body or of any member, officer or employee of that body are only public resources to the extent that they are resources obtained from another public body or a public officer under an agreement.

15 Meaning of anti-democratic conduct (1) Conduct is anti-democratic conduct if it is conduct engaged in by a person or body (whether or not a public officer or public body) that: (a) constitutes an offence against the Electoral Act 2004,

Chapter 8 of the Local Government Act 2019 or Chapter 8 of the Local Government Act 2008 (before its repeal); and (b) affects, or is part of a course of conduct aimed at affecting: (i) the behaviour of the community or multiple members of the community in relation to voting in elections; or (ii) the reputation, power or influence, or resources of a political party or a candidate for election; or (iii) the ability of the public to ascertain the resources and associated entities of a political party or the resources of a candidate for an election; or

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 17 (iv) the Electoral Commissioner's ability to detect and investigate contraventions of the Electoral Act 2004 or Chapter 8 of the Local Government Act 2019 and generally to ensure compliance with those Acts. Examples for subsection (1) 1 An offence against section 215 of the Electoral Act 2004 (failing to make return regarding donations, gifts or expenditure) affecting the ability of the public to ascertain the resources or associated entities of a political party. 2 An offence against section 271 of the Electoral Act 2004 (push-polling) that is intended to influence the votes of multiple electors or affect the reputation of a political party or candidate for election. (2) Subsection (1)(b)(ii) extends to conduct occurring before the political party was formed or before the candidate for election became a candidate. resources includes loans, gifts and donations, whether monetary or otherwise.

16 Meaning of public body and public officer (1) Each of the following is a public body: (a) an Agency; (b) a local government council; (c) the Police Force; (d) a court; (e) a board, commission, tribunal or other body established under an Act that has judicial or quasi-judicial functions in the performance of its deliberative functions; (f) a body, whether incorporated or not, established under an Act; (g) a body whose members, or a majority of whose members, are (h) a government owned corporation; (i) a nursing home; (j) a public hospital; (k) a university;

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 18 (l) any other body, whether incorporated or not: (i) that receives, directly or indirectly, public resources; or (ii) performing a public function on behalf of the Territory, a public body or a public officer (whether under contract or otherwise). (2) Subject to subsection (3), each of the following is a public officer: (a) a minister; (b) an MLA; (c) a judicial officer; (d) the holder of an office established under an Act who is (e) a member, officer or employee of a public body; (f) any other person engaged, whether under the Contracts Act 1978 or otherwise, by or on behalf of a person mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (e) in relation to the performance of official functions. Examples for subsection (2) Each of the following is a public officer: (a) a member of NTCAT (b) a public sector employee; (c) a police officer; (d) a statutory office holder; (e) an adviser to, or electorate officer of, a minister or an MLA; (f) a local councillor; (g) a local council employee. (3) The following are not public officers: (a) the Inspector; (b) a member of Inspector staff in relation to the performance of official functions for the Inspector; (c) an Acting ICAC appointed to investigate the ICAC, the ICAC's Office or a member of ICAC staff, in relation to the investigation;

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 19 (d) a member of ICAC staff assisting an Acting ICAC appointed to investigate the ICAC, the ICAC's Office or a member of ICAC staff, in relation to the investigation. court means the Supreme Court or the Local Court. nursing home, see section 5 of the Medical Services Act 1982. Police Force, see section 4(1) of the Police Administration Act 1978. public hospital means premises declared under section 6(2) of the Medical Services Act 1982 to be a hospital, other than a hospital conducted under a licence granted under the Private Hospitals Act 1981. university means: (a) Charles Darwin University; or (b) Batchelor Institute of Indigenous Tertiary Education.

17 Establishment of ICAC There is to be an Independent Commissioner Against Corruption. Note for section 17 Part 7, Division 1 deals with the appointment of the ICAC and related matters.

18 Functions (1) The ICAC has the following functions: (a) to identify and investigate improper conduct; (b) to protect persons who have assisted or may assist in detecting, preventing, investigating or otherwise responding to improper conduct; (c) to prevent, detect and respond to improper conduct by: (i) developing and delivering education and training; and (ii) evaluating or reviewing practices, policies and procedures of public bodies and public officers; and

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 20 (iii) developing and delivering advice, reports, information and recommendations; and (iv) referring matters to a referral entity for investigation or further investigation, disciplinary action or prosecution; and (v) making public comment; and (vi) gathering intelligence about improper conduct; (d) to oversee and direct, as required, how referral entities deal with matters referred to them by the ICAC; (e) to perform other functions conferred on the ICAC under this or another Act. (2) The ICAC may perform functions under this Act in relation to any matter that may involve improper conduct. (3) Without limiting subsection (2), the ICAC is to: (a) give priority to dealing with matters that, in the ICAC's opinion, may involve corrupt conduct or serious anti-democratic (b) refer other matters that may involve improper conduct to a referral entity, unless there is a good reason for the ICAC not to refer the matter. (4) Without limiting subsection (3)(b), it is a good reason for the ICAC not to refer a matter to a referral entity if referring the matter: (a) may adversely affect the performance or future performance of the ICAC's functions; or (b) may reveal the identity of a protected person. (5) Subject to this Act, the ICAC may perform the ICAC's functions in any manner the ICAC considers appropriate.

18A Limitation on functions (1) The ICAC must not investigate an allegation of misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct unless: (a) the alleged misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct arises from the same matter that is the subject of an investigation into corrupt conduct or anti-democratic conduct; or

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 21 (b) the gravity of the matter is such that it warrants the use of the powers and resources given to the ICAC because: (i) the person alleged to have engaged in the misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct is or was an MLA or the Chief Executive Officer or head of a public body or a government owned corporation; or (ii) in the opinion of the ICAC, the alleged misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct would have a significant effect on the Territory; or (iii) the alleged misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct gives rise to a suspicion on the part of the ICAC of systemic misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct. (2) If during the course of an investigation, the ICAC becomes of the opinion that the investigation is likely to lead to a finding of no more than misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct, the ICAC must cease to investigate the matter, unless subsection (1)(a) or (b) applies to the matter. (3) To avoid doubt, the ICAC has discretion to determine, in accordance subsections (1) and (2), which matters to investigate or to continue to investigate under this Act.

19 Powers The ICAC may do all things necessary or convenient to be done for, or in relation to, the performance of the ICAC's functions. Note for section 19 A reference in this Act to a function includes a reference to a power, and performing a function includes exercising a power – see section 4, definitions function and perform.

20 ICAC to act in public interest (1) If the ICAC has a discretion in performing a function under this Act, the ICAC is to act in the public interest, taking into account the matters set out in Schedule 1 that the ICAC considers relevant and appropriate in any particular case. (2) Subject to subsection (3), this section does not create any legal rights in any person or give rise to any civil cause of action. (3) Subsection (2) does not affect a person's right to seek judicial review of administrative action by the ICAC.

Division 1 Mandatory reporting of suspected improper conduct Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 22

21 Independence of ICAC The ICAC is not subject to direction by any person about: (a) the way the ICAC performs the ICAC's functions under this Act; or (b) the priority given to any particular matters. Division 1 Mandatory reporting of suspected improper

22 ICAC to establish system for mandatory reporting (1) The ICAC must issue, and keep under review, directions and guidelines governing the reporting to the ICAC of improper conduct. (2) Directions may: (a) require a public body or public officer to report suspected improper conduct; and (b) set out the circumstances that constitute suspicion for paragraph (a); and (c) require matters to be reported even if they have been referred to the public body or public officer under another Act. Note for subsection (2) The directions and guidelines must be published on the ICAC's website – see section 130. (3) Without limiting the directions, they may require different classes of public bodies and public officers to disclose different classes of suspected improper conduct. Examples for subsection (3) A direction could require: (a) all public officers engaged on an executive contract of employment under the Public Sector Employment and Management Act 1993 to report suspected corrupt conduct and suspected serious or systemic misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct; or (b) all correctional officers under the Correctional Services Act 2014 to report suspected improper conduct related to youth detainees. (4) The ICAC must issue the directions and guidelines within 6 months after the commencement of this section.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 23 (5) A public body or public officer: (a) must report to the ICAC in accordance with the directions; and (b) may report to the ICAC any suspected improper conduct.

Division 2 Evaluations and reviews

23 Evaluations and reviews (1) The ICAC may, at any time, evaluate or review the practices, policies or procedures of a public body or public officer to identify whether improper conduct has occurred, is occurring or is at risk of occurring. (2) Despite subsection (1), the ICAC cannot evaluate or review the practices, policies or procedures of a court or judicial officer in relation to the performance of judicial functions. (3) For an evaluation or review, the ICAC may exercise the powers in Part 4. (4) The ICAC must provide a report in relation to the results of the evaluation or review to a person with responsibility for the public body or public officer the subject of the evaluation or review. (5) The ICAC is not required to include in a report mentioned in subsection (4) any information that may prejudice a current or future investigation, prosecution or disciplinary action. Note for section 23 The ICAC may also make a general report in relation to an evaluation or review – see section 48(1)(a).

24 Preliminary inquiries (1) The ICAC may, at any time, make preliminary inquiries to determine whether: (a) to refer or investigate a matter that has come to the ICAC's attention that may involve improper conduct; or (b) to make a recommendation, general report or public statement; or (c) to otherwise perform the ICAC's functions in relation to improper conduct.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 24 (2) For preliminary inquiries, the ICAC may do any of the following: (a) collect or receive information from any source; (b) exercise the powers in Part 4.

24A Power to require preliminary information and items from public bodies and public officers (1) For the performance of the ICAC's functions under this Act, an authorised officer may, at any time, require a public body or public officer to: (a) answer specified questions or provide specified information; or (b) produce specified items, or items of a specified kind, in the body's or officer's possession or control. (2) When making a requirement under subsection (1), the authorised officer must inform the public body or public officer about the following but is not required to give any other information about the nature or purpose of the requirement: (a) that the requirement is made for the purposes of the ICAC; (b) if the body or officer is under investigation – that fact. (3) A requirement under subsection (1), and accompanying information under subsection (2), may be made: (4) A written notice to provide information or produce an item may require the person to verify the information or item by statutory declaration. (5) If an item is produced under this section: must allow the public body or public officer reasonable access to the item. Note for section 24A Section 147A creates an offence for failing to comply with a requirement under this section. See also Part 5, Division 1.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 25

25 Referral to referral entity (1) The ICAC may, at any time, refer to a referral entity a matter that has come to the ICAC's attention that may involve improper conduct. See also section 18(2). (2) For a matter that concerns the conduct of a public officer: (a) who is an MLA (even if the conduct is alleged to have occurred before the person became an MLA), or who was an MLA at the time the conduct is alleged to have occurred, the referral entity is: (i) the Speaker; or (ii) if the MLA is the Speaker – the Deputy Speaker; or (b) who is a Deputy Coroner (even if the conduct is alleged to have occurred before the person became a Deputy Coroner), or who was a Deputy Coroner at the time the conduct is alleged to have occurred, the referral entity is the Territory Coroner; or (c) who is the Commissioner of Police, the referral entity is: (i) the Ombudsman; or (ii) the Minister administering Part II of the Police Administration Act 1978; or (iii) the Anti-Discrimination Commissioner; (d) who is a police officer other than the Commissioner of Police, the referral entity is: (i) the Ombudsman; or (ii) the Commissioner of Police; or (iii) the Anti-Discrimination Commissioner. (3) For any matter concerning the conduct of any other public officer or a public body, the ICAC may refer the matter to any entity the ICAC considers appropriate for the public officer or public body's role or function at the time of referral or at the time the conduct is alleged

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 26 to have occurred, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) a public body; (b) the holder of an office established under an Act who is (c) a law enforcement agency; (d) an agency of another Australian jurisdiction that has functions similar to those of the ICAC; (e) an entity in Australia that regulates, or has oversight of standards for: (i) a profession, trade, occupation or group; or (ii) a type of organisation (for example, corporations or incorporated associations); (f) an entity prescribed, or of a class prescribed, by regulation. (4) The ICAC may refer a matter to more than one referral entity or parts of the same matter to different referral entities. (5) Without limiting subsection (1), the ICAC may, at any time: (a) refer a matter that may involve the commission of an offence to the Commissioner of Police or another law enforcement agency having jurisdiction to investigate the offence; or (b) refer a matter to the Director of Public Prosecutions: (i) to seek the Director's opinion or advice; or (ii) to request the Director to grant an indemnity from prosecution; or (c) refer a matter that may involve anti-democratic conduct to the Electoral Commissioner. (6) Without limiting subsection (2) or (3), each of the following entities is a referral entity in relation to a matter referred, or that may be referred, to the entity under subsection (5): (a) the Commissioner of Police; (b) a law enforcement agency; (c) the Director of Public Prosecutions;

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 27 (d) the Electoral Commissioner. (7) If a matter concerning the conduct of a police officer is referred to the Commissioner of Police, the Commissioner of Police must notify the Ombudsman of the referral.

25A Referral to Judicial Commission (1) The ICAC may refer to the Judicial Commission, established under the Judicial Commission Act 2020, any matter relating to the behaviour or the physical or mental capacity of a judicial officer or a member of NTCAT that could constitute a complaint under the Judicial Commission Act 2020. (2) Despite section 26, the ICAC must consult with the Judicial Commission before referring a matter under this section, unless consultation is not required under a memorandum of understanding or protocol referred to in subsection (3). (3) The ICAC and the Judicial Commission may enter into a memorandum of understanding or protocol about practices and procedures for referrals.

26 Consultation before referral The ICAC may consult a referral entity in deciding whether to make a referral to the entity.

27 Information, documents or other items to be provided with referral (1) The ICAC may provide or disclose to a referral entity any information the ICAC has in relation to a matter referred, or that may be referred, to the entity. (2) The ICAC is under no obligation to disclose to the referral entity the original source of any information. (3) The ICAC may provide to a referral entity any documents or other items the ICAC has in relation to a matter referred, or that may be referred, to the entity.

28 Directions to referral entity (1) Subject to this section, the ICAC may give directions to a referral entity in relation to the referral, including directions as to: (a) how the referral entity is to deal with the matter; and

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 28 (b) reporting requirements of the referral entity in relation to the matter. (2) Except as provided by subsection (3), the ICAC cannot give directions under subsection (1) to an independent entity. (3) The ICAC may give directions to an independent entity, other than the Speaker, Deputy Speaker, Judicial Commission or a judicial officer, requiring the entity to report to the ICAC on the actions taken by the entity on the referral and the outcome of those actions. (4) A referral entity is not obliged to comply with a direction of the ICAC to the extent that compliance is beyond the power, or incompatible with the functions, of the referral entity.

29 Referral entity may disclose information to ICAC Despite any obligation of non-disclosure on a referral entity, the referral entity may disclose information to the ICAC in relation to a referral or potential referral to the entity.

30 Withdrawal or suspension of referral The ICAC may, at any time, by written notice to a referral entity, other than an independent entity: (a) withdraw a referral; or (b) require the referral entity to suspend dealing with, or taking particular action in relation to, the matter referred: (i) for the period specified by the ICAC; or (ii) until further notice from the ICAC.

30A Referral of other matters Nothing in this Division prevents the ICAC from referring a matter to a referral entity, not being a matter that amounts to improper conduct, that, in the opinion of the ICAC, warrants referral for consideration of any appropriate action by that entity.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 29

31 Power to investigate (1) The ICAC may commence an investigation if the ICAC has, or is aware of, information that, if true, would tend to show that improper conduct has occurred, is occurring or is at risk of occurring. See also section 18(2). (2) The ICAC may commence an investigation: (a) despite a provision of another law of the Territory providing that the subject matter is final or cannot be appealed against, challenged or called into question; and (b) even if the subject matter is the subject of: (i) a referral; or (ii) an investigation under another law of the Territory; or (iii) legal proceedings. Note for subsection (2)(b)(ii) and (iii) Whether the subject matter is the subject of another investigation or of legal proceedings are matters to which the ICAC is to take into account – see Schedule 1, clause 3(b) and (c). (3) If the ICAC has, or is aware of, information that, if true, would not itself amount to improper conduct but may be directly or indirectly connected with improper conduct, or be part of a course of activity involving improper conduct, the ICAC may commence an investigation based on the information. (4) For an investigation, the ICAC may exercise the powers in Part 4 in addition to any powers in this Division or Division 6.

32 Power to require information and items for investigation (1) For an investigation, the ICAC may require a person: (a) to answer specified questions or provide specified information; or (b) to produce specified items, or items of a specified kind, in the person's possession or control.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 30 (2) When making a requirement, the ICAC must state the nature of the matters about which the person is to be questioned, or to which the information or items relate, except to the extent the ICAC considers on reasonable grounds doing so would: (3) A requirement under subsection (1) may be made: (4) A written notice to provide information or produce an item: (a) may require the person to verify the information or item by statutory declaration; and (b) must state a time within which the person must provide the information or produce the item. (5) If an item is produced to the ICAC in connection with an investigation: must allow the owner reasonable access to the item. Note for section 32 Section 148 creates an offence for failing to comply with a requirement under this section.

33 Power to inspect financial records (1) For an investigation, the ICAC may give a written notice to a deposit holder requiring the deposit holder to permit a person specified in the notice to inspect and take copies of financial records. (2) The notice must be given to the deposit holder not less than 3 days before the inspection is to occur, unless the ICAC otherwise directs. (3) For the inspection, the person specified in the notice may give directions to, or impose requirements on, the deposit holder or an officer or employee of the deposit holder.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 31 (4) The ICAC must keep a record of each notice and inspection under this section that identifies: (a) the investigation to which the inspection relates; and (b) the relevance of the inspection to the investigation. credit provider means a credit provider within the meaning of the National Credit Code in Schedule 1 to the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 (Cth). deposit holder means: (a) an ADI; or (b) a friendly society; or (c) a person who, or body that, holds money in accounts on behalf of other persons; or (d) a credit provider; or (e) a person who carries on business as a pawnbroker; or (f) an institution of a kind prescribed by regulation. financial records means any of the following in the possession or control of a deposit holder: (a) books of account, accounts and accounting records (including working papers and other items necessary to explain the methods and calculations by which accounts are made up); (b) books, diaries or other records used in the course of carrying on the business of a deposit holder; (c) cheques, bills of exchange, promissory notes, deposit slips, orders for the payment of money, invoices, receipts and vouchers; (d) securities and documents of title to securities.

34 Power to require person to attend for examination (1) For an investigation, the ICAC may require a person to attend the ICAC for examination.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 32 (2) The person must be given a written notice: (a) requiring the person to attend for examination at a specified time and place; and (b) comprehensively stating the nature of the matters about which the person is to be questioned, except to the extent the ICAC considers on reasonable grounds doing so would: (i) be likely to prejudice the conduct of the investigation; or (ii) be contrary to the public interest; and (c) if the person is under investigation – stating that fact. (3) The notice may require the person to bring and produce to the ICAC specified items, or items of a specified kind, in the person's possession or control relevant to the investigation. (4) The ICAC may require a witness at an examination to do one or more of the following: (a) take an oath to answer all questions truthfully; (b) answer a question relevant to the investigation asked by the ICAC or by another person present at the examination; (c) produce at the examination any items in the possession or control of the witness relevant to the investigation. (5) If the ICAC gives a person a written notice under subsection (2) to attend the ICAC for examination but, in reliance on subsection (2)(b), does not comprehensively state the nature of the matters about which the person is to be questioned, the ICAC must within 3 days after the notice is given: (a) give the Inspector a copy of the notice; and (b) inform the Inspector of the reasonable grounds that form the basis of the ICAC's belief under that subsection. comprehensively stating means stating the following in relation to the matter or matters about which the person is to be questioned: (a) the factual topics to be addressed; (b) any applicable dates that are known to the ICAC;

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 33 (c) the role the ICAC understands the person played in respect of the factual topics referred to in paragraph (a). Note for section 34 Section 149 creates an offence for contravening a requirement under this section.

35 Examination to be held in private An examination must be held in private.

36 Legal or other representation (1) A witness at an examination may request the ICAC to allow the witness to be represented by a legal practitioner or agent. (2) The ICAC must grant a request for legal representation unless the request is for representation by a particular legal practitioner the presence of whom the ICAC believes on reasonable grounds would prejudice the investigation because that legal practitioner is: (a) a witness in the investigation or another investigation; or (b) the representative of another witness in the investigation or another investigation; or (c) a person involved in, or suspected of being involved in, a matter being investigated by the ICAC; or (d) the representative of a person involved in, or suspected of being involved in, a matter being investigated by the ICAC. (3) The ICAC may grant a request for representation by an agent other than a legal practitioner if the ICAC considers it appropriate to do so. (4) The legal practitioner or agent may: (a) make submissions to the ICAC; and (b) with the ICAC's approval, ask the witness questions relevant to the investigation.

37 Interpreters (1) If necessary to make the proceeding intelligible to a witness at an examination, the witness must be assisted by an interpreter or other person, unless the ICAC believes on reasonable grounds that the presence of the interpreter or other person would:

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 34 (2) The ICAC must: (a) make reasonable efforts to obtain the services of the interpreter or other person; and (b) meet the costs of the interpreter or other person.

38 Joint investigations (1) The ICAC may conduct an investigation as a joint investigation with a referral entity in relation to a matter, whether or not the ICAC has referred the matter to the entity under Division 4. (2) For a joint investigation, the ICAC must enter into an agreement with the referral entity setting out the arrangements for the joint investigation, including: (a) the respective responsibilities of the ICAC and the referral entity in relation to the joint investigation; and (b) proposed timelines for the joint investigation; and (c) information-sharing between the ICAC and the referral entity in relation to the joint investigation. (3) The ICAC or the referral entity may, at any time, do anything in relation to the subject matter of the investigation that the ICAC or entity could have done but for the agreement. Example for subsection (3) The ICAC could investigate the subject matter, or part of the subject matter, of a joint investigation as a separate investigation under this Division without involving the referral entity. (4) The ICAC or referral entity must inform the other party to the agreement if the ICAC or referral entity wishes to terminate the agreement or depart substantially from any of its terms. (5) Failure to enter an agreement under subsection (2), abide by the terms of the agreement or notify the other party under subsection (4) does not invalidate or otherwise affect anything done by the ICAC or referral entity in relation to the investigation.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 35

38A Use of information, documents and other items Subject to this Act, information, documents or other items obtained by the ICAC in the lawful performance of functions in relation to an investigation may be used: (a) by the ICAC for the purposes of any other investigation; or (b) by a referral entity in relation to a matter referred to it, if provided to the entity under section 27.

39 Public inquiries (1) The ICAC may hold a public inquiry for an investigation. (2) The ICAC must make a public announcement of the public inquiry setting out: (a) the general scope and purpose of the inquiry; and (b) the time and place of the inquiry.

40 Public inquiries generally to be open to public A public inquiry is to be open to the public unless the ICAC directs otherwise under section 46.

41 Power to require attendance Section 34 applies in relation to a public inquiry as if a reference in that section to an examination were a reference to a public inquiry.

42 Appearance generally (1) A person or body may apply to the ICAC to appear at a public inquiry. (2) The ICAC may permit the person or body to appear if the person or body satisfies the ICAC that it is appropriate for the person or body to appear at the public inquiry. (3) A person or body appearing at a public inquiry, or their legal practitioner or agent (if any), may: (a) make submissions to the ICAC; and (b) with the ICAC's approval, ask witnesses questions relevant to the inquiry.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 36

43 Right of response if adverse allegations made (1) If, at a public inquiry, allegations are made against a person or body that, if true, could reasonably affect the ICAC's findings on the subject matter of the inquiry, the ICAC must give the person or body a reasonable opportunity to respond to the allegations. (2) The ICAC may determine whether the opportunity to respond is to be given by allowing the person or body to make written submissions to the inquiry or appear at the inquiry or both.

44 Legal or other representation (1) A witness, or another person or body appearing, at a public inquiry may request the ICAC to allow the witness, person or body to be represented by a legal practitioner or agent. (2) The ICAC must grant a request for legal representation unless the request is for representation by a particular legal practitioner the presence of whom the ICAC believes on reasonable grounds would prejudice the investigation because that legal practitioner is: (a) a witness in the investigation or another investigation; or (b) the representative of another witness in the investigation or another investigation; or (c) a person involved in, or suspected of being involved in, a matter being investigated by the ICAC; or (d) the representative of a person involved in, or suspected of being involved in, a matter being investigated by the ICAC. (3) The ICAC may grant a request for representation by an agent other than a legal practitioner if the ICAC considers it appropriate to do so.

45 Interpreters (1) If necessary to make the proceeding intelligible to a witness at a public inquiry, the witness must be assisted by an interpreter or other person, unless the ICAC believes on reasonable grounds that the presence of the interpreter or other person would:

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 37 (2) The ICAC must: (a) make reasonable efforts to obtain the services of the interpreter or other person; and (b) meet the costs of the interpreter or other person.

46 Directions for private hearing and non-publication (1) For a public inquiry, the ICAC may give any of the following directions: (a) a direction that the inquiry, or part of it, be held in private; (b) a direction prohibiting or restricting the publication of information that would enable a witness or person or body appearing to be identified or contacted; (c) a direction prohibiting or restricting the publication of evidence given at the inquiry; (d) a direction excluding a person from the inquiry or part of it. Section 150 creates an offence for contravening a direction under this section. (2) If the ICAC receives a request for a direction mentioned in subsection (1)(a), the ICAC must, in private, hear arguments about and determine the request, unless the ICAC has reason to believe the request is vexatious or without merit.

47 Requirement to inform witness of certain matters Before a witness is questioned at a public inquiry, the ICAC must inform the witness of the following: (a) that a public inquiry, or part of it, may be held in private; (b) that the witness may request a direction mentioned in section 46(1)(a) if the witness is being asked to give an answer or any other evidence: (i) that the witness is not legally required to give; or (ii) about a personal or sensitive matter; or (iii) about an offence that the witness may have committed that is not directly related to the subject matter of the inquiry; or (iv) that concerns the witness for any other reason;

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 38 (c) that the ICAC will hear and determine the request in private, unless the ICAC has reason to believe the request is vexatious or without merit. Example for paragraph (b)(ii) The witness is being asked to give an answer or any other evidence about a personal health matter.

48 General report (1) The ICAC may, at any time, make a report (a general report) in relation to any of the following: (a) an evaluation or review carried out under section 23; (b) systemic issues the ICAC has identified in one or more public bodies in relation to improper conduct; (c) matters the ICAC believes may be affecting the incidence of improper conduct in one or more public bodies; (d) the reporting of improper conduct by public bodies and public officers, including the following: (i) the adequacy of reporting and of mechanisms to enable or encourage reporting; (ii) the extent to which reporting is encouraged and supported; (iii) the impact on persons who report or assist in dealing with improper conduct; (e) matters that the ICAC considers have seriously affected, or may seriously affect, the ICAC's ability to perform the ICAC's functions, including the following: (i) intentional or unintentional obstruction of the ICAC; (ii) unexpected events; (iii) current or proposed laws of the Territory; (iv) adequacy of resources available to the ICAC; (f) a general update on the ICAC's activities; (g) the identification of integrity risks;

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 39 (h) relevant matters that have arisen in another Territory, a State or the Commonwealth. Note for subsection (1)(a) Any general report is in addition to the mandatory report mentioned in section 23(4). A general report may contain recommendations – see section 56. (2) A general report must contain information as to the factual basis on which the ICAC expresses any opinions in the report, but the ICAC is not required to include details about specific investigations, unless the ICAC considers it in the public interest to do so. (2A) If, in accordance with subsection (2), the ICAC includes any details about a specific investigation in a general report, the report must not: (a) include an opinion as to whether a person has committed, is committing or is about to commit, an offence or a breach of discipline; or (b) include a comment as to the prospects of success of any current or future prosecution or disciplinary action; or (c) name or identify any person in relation to a matter that amounts to no more than misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct, unless, in the opinion of the ICAC: (i) the alleged misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct gives rise to a suspicion of systemic misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct; or (ii) other exceptional circumstances exist that make it appropriate to name or otherwise identify the person. (2B) For subsection (2A)(a), an opinion that a person has engaged, is engaging or is about to engage in improper conduct is not an opinion that the person is guilty of or has committed, is committing or is about to commit an offence or a breach of discipline. (2C) Subsection (2B) does not authorise the naming or identification of a person contrary to subsection (2A)(c). (3) The ICAC must not: (a) make a general report about the processes or procedures by which judicial decisions are made; or

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 40 (b) in a general report take issue with the merits of a judicial decision. (4) A general report may be made to: (a) a public body or public officer that the ICAC considers would be assisted by the report; or (b) the Speaker.

49 Publication of general report made to Speaker (1) This section applies in relation to a general report made to the Speaker. (2) The Speaker must table a copy of the report in the Legislative Assembly within 6 sitting days after the Speaker receives the (3) The ICAC may include in the report a recommendation that the report be made public immediately. (4) If the report contains a recommendation mentioned in subsection (3), the Speaker may make the report public whether or not the Legislative Assembly is in session and whether or not the report has been tabled. (5) If the report is made public under subsection (4) before it is tabled, the report attracts the same privileges and immunities as it would if it had been tabled.

50 Investigation report (1) The ICAC may make a report (an investigation report) on an investigation to a responsible authority for a public body or public officer whose conduct is the subject of the investigation. An investigation report may contain recommendations – see section 56. (1A) If an investigation involved the holding of a public inquiry, the ICAC must make an investigation report under subsection (1). (2) If the ICAC proposes to make an adverse finding about a person or body in an investigation report, the ICAC must give the person or body a reasonable opportunity to respond to the adverse material and include a fair representation of the response in the report.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 41 (3) An investigation report may: (a) contain as much information as the ICAC considers appropriate in relation to the subject matter of the investigation to which the inquiry relates; and (b) include a finding as to whether a person has engaged in, is engaging in or is about to engage in, improper conduct; and (c) include information as to whether an allegation of improper conduct has been referred to, or in the ICAC's opinion warrants referral to, a referral entity. An investigation report may contain recommendations – see section 56. (4) However, an investigation report must not include a finding: (a) as to whether a person has committed, is committing or is about to commit, an offence or a breach of discipline; or (b) as to the prospects of success of any current or future prosecution or disciplinary action. (5) For subsection (4), a finding that a person has engaged, is engaging or is about to engage in improper conduct is not a finding that the person is guilty of or has committed, is committing or is about to commit an offence or a breach of discipline. (6) For an investigation report made to the Speaker or Deputy Speaker, the Speaker or Deputy Speaker must table a copy of the report in the Legislative Assembly on the next sitting day after the Speaker or Deputy Speaker receives the report. (6A) An investigation report made to the Speaker or Deputy Speaker under subsection (6) must not name or identify any person other than an MLA in relation to a matter that amounts to no more than misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct, unless, in the opinion of the ICAC: (a) the alleged misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct gives rise to a suspicion of systemic misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct; or (b) other exceptional circumstances exist that make it appropriate to name or otherwise identify the person. (6B) Nothing in this section requires more than one investigation report to be prepared if this section requires an investigation report to be made to more than one responsible authority.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 42 responsible authority means: (a) for a public body or public officer other than a minister or an MLA: (i) an entity having authority to deal with one or more matters relating to improper conduct the subject of the investigation to which the report relates; or (ii) an entity whose functions include making future decisions in the public interest that may be better informed by receipt of the investigation report; or (b) for a minister or an MLA other than the Speaker – the Speaker; or (c) for the Speaker – the Deputy Speaker.

50A Publication of investigation report (1) The ICAC may publish an investigation report if the ICAC is of the opinion it is appropriate to do so. (2) A report published under subsection (1) must not name or identify any person in relation to a matter that amounts to no more than misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct, unless, in the opinion of the ICAC: (a) the alleged misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct gives rise to a suspicion of systemic misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct; or (b) other exceptional circumstances exist that make it appropriate to name or otherwise identify the person. (3) Subsection (1) does not apply to an investigation report made to the Speaker or Deputy Speaker under section 50(6).

51 Brief of evidence (1) Following an investigation, the ICAC may provide a brief of evidence: (a) to a law enforcement agency for the purpose of investigating, or prosecuting a person for, an offence; or

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 43 (b) to a public body or public officer for the purpose of investigating whether disciplinary action should be taken, or taking disciplinary action, against a public officer. (2) Any material in a brief of evidence provided under subsection (1) that would not be admissible in a civil or criminal proceeding because of section 82 must be provided in a sealed form, separately to any other material in the brief of evidence, unless the inadmissible material is already in the public domain.

53 Report to Minister concerning referral (1) If the ICAC has referred a matter to a referral entity, the ICAC may make a report at any time about the referral including, but not limited to, the following: (a) the nature of the matter referred; (b) any failure by the referral entity to follow a direction of the ICAC in relation to the referral; (c) any other concerns of the ICAC about the referral entity's response to the referral. A report may contain recommendations – see section 56. (2) A report is to be made: (a) for a referral entity that is a public body or public officer – to the responsible Minister for the public body or public officer; or (b) otherwise – to the ICAC Minister.

54 Report to Assembly concerning referral (1) This section applies if: (a) the ICAC has made a report under section 53; and (b) either: (i) the minister to whom the report is made provides a written response to the ICAC; or (ii) the minister to whom the report is made does not provide a written response within a reasonable time; and (c) the ICAC is not satisfied with the minister's response (if any).

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 44 (2) The ICAC may make a report on the referral: (a) to the Assembly Committee; or (b) if there is no Assembly Committee – to the Speaker. (3) The report: (a) may contain as much information as the ICAC considers appropriate in relation to the referral; and (b) must contain a fair representation of any response provided by the minister. The report may contain recommendations – see section 56. (4) The chairperson of the Assembly Committee or the Speaker must table a copy of the report in the Legislative Assembly within 6 sitting days after the chairperson or Speaker receives the report.

55 Public statements (1) This section applies in relation to a particular matter that the ICAC is dealing with or has dealt with, including a matter the ICAC has referred to a referral entity. (2) The ICAC may make a statement in relation to the matter for any of the following purposes: (a) to provide information about action taken or that may be taken by the ICAC in relation to the matter; (b) to indicate that it would be inappropriate for the ICAC to comment on the matter; (c) to refuse to confirm or deny anything in relation to the matter; (d) to seek evidence in relation to the matter in the course of preliminary inquiries into, or an investigation of, the matter; (e) to provide information about a referral, including the outcome of the referral; (f) to address public misconception about a person or issue of which the ICAC has particular knowledge; (g) to request the Legislative Assembly to authorise the publication, or disclosure to the ICAC, of information or an item that is or may be the subject of parliamentary privilege.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 45 (3) The ICAC may make a public statement, in a manner determined by the ICAC, to: (a) the public at large; or (b) a section of the public; or (c) a particular person or body. (4) Subsections (1) to (3) do not authorise any of the following public statements: (a) an opinion as to whether a person has committed, is committing or is about to commit, an offence or a breach of discipline; (b) a comment as to the prospects of success of any current or future prosecution or disciplinary action; (c) the naming or identification of any person other than an MLA in relation to a matter that amounts to no more than misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct unless, in the opinion of the ICAC: (i) the alleged misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct gives rise to a suspicion of systemic misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct; or (ii) other exceptional circumstances exist that make it appropriate to name or otherwise identify the person. (5) For subsection (4)(a), a public statement that a person has engaged, is engaging or is about to engage in improper conduct is not a public statement that the person is guilty of or has committed, is committing or is about to commit an offence or a breach of discipline. (6) Subsection (5) does not authorise the naming or identification of a person contrary to subsection (4)(c).

56 Recommendations (1) The ICAC may, at any time, make recommendations to a public body or public officer in relation to preventing, detecting, investigating, prosecuting or otherwise dealing with improper conduct, if the ICAC considers the recommendations are within the functions of the body or officer to implement or progress. (2) Recommendations must be in writing and may be contained in a report under this Division.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 46 (3) If recommendations are made in relation to an investigation, the ICAC must: (a) identify in the recommendations the investigation to which they relate; and (b) provide information to assist the public body or public officer to understand why the recommendations have been made and what they are intended to achieve.

57 Dealing with recommendations (1) The ICAC may request a public body or public officer to whom recommendations have been made to give written notice to the ICAC, within a reasonable time specified in the notice, of: (a) the steps taken or proposed to be taken to implement the recommendations; or (b) if no steps, or only some steps, have been taken or are proposed to be taken, the reasons for not taking all the steps necessary to implement the recommendations. (2) If the ICAC is not satisfied that adequate steps have been taken to implement the recommendations within a reasonable time as specified, the ICAC, after considering any comments made by the public body or public officer, may: (a) if the public officer is a minister – make a report concerning recommendations under section 58; or (b) otherwise: (i) give a copy of the recommendations and a copy of the comments to the responsible Minister for the public body or public officer; and (ii) invite the responsible Minister to provide a written response to the ICAC within a reasonable time specified in the invitation. (3) This section does not apply to recommendations made in a general report mentioned in section 48(4)(b).

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 47

58 Report concerning recommendations (1) This section applies if, under section 57(2)(b), the ICAC has given the responsible Minister for a public body or public officer a copy of recommendations and comments and: (a) the responsible Minister provides a written response to the ICAC; or (b) the responsible Minister does not provide a written response within the time specified under section 57(2)(b)(ii). (2) This section also applies as mentioned in section 57(2)(a). (3) The ICAC may make a report concerning the recommendations to the ICAC Minister. (4) A report concerning recommendations: (a) may contain as much information as the ICAC considers appropriate regarding the reasons for the recommendations and the context in which they were made; and (b) must contain a fair representation of: (i) any reasons provided by the public body or public officer for not taking all the steps necessary to implement the recommendations; and (ii) any response provided by the responsible Minister for the public body or public officer. (5) The ICAC Minister must table a copy of the report concerning recommendations in the Legislative Assembly within 6 sitting days after the ICAC Minister receives the report.

59 Certain reports and public statements not to contain inadmissible material (1) This section applies to the following: (a) a general report; (b) an investigation report made to the Speaker or Deputy Speaker; (c) an investigation report that is to be published under section 50A; (d) a report under section 54;

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 48 (e) a report concerning recommendations; (f) a public statement. (2) The report or public statement must not contain any material that would not be admissible in civil or criminal proceedings because of section 82, unless the material is already in the public domain. (3) Subsection (2) does not prevent the ICAC from commenting on, or drawing inferences from, the absence of any exculpatory evidence if the ICAC could otherwise do so but for subsection (2). (4) Subsection (2) does not prevent the use of material that would not be admissible in civil or criminal proceedings because of section 82 and that does not identify any individual: (a) for educational or training purposes; or (b) to disclose systemic improper conduct.

60 Evidence and procedure (1) For an investigation, including an examination or a public inquiry, the ICAC is not bound by the rules of evidence. (2) The ICAC must conduct an examination or a public inquiry with as little formality and technicality as is, in the opinion of the ICAC, appropriate in the circumstances. (3) For subsection (2), the ICAC must, as far as the ICAC considers appropriate in the circumstances: (a) accept written submissions; and (b) conduct examinations and public inquiries in a non-adversarial manner.

61 Attendance of persons in custody (1) If the ICAC requires the attendance at an examination or public inquiry of a person who is in custody, the ICAC may issue a written direction for the production of the person at the time and place specified in the direction.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 49 (2) The direction is to be given: (a) if the person is in the lawful custody of the Commissioner of Correctional Services – to the Commissioner of Correctional Services; or (b) if the person is in the lawful custody of the Commissioner of Police – to the Commissioner of Police. (3) The direction is sufficient authority for producing the person, who must be produced accordingly. lawful custody: (a) of the Commissioner of Correctional Services, see section 9(1) of the Correctional Services Act 2014; or (b) of the Commissioner of Police, means under arrest or otherwise in the lawful custody of a police officer.

62 Order for surrender of passport (1) The ICAC may apply to the Supreme Court if: (a) a notice has been given to a person to attend an examination or public inquiry, whether or not the person has received the notice; and (b) the ICAC believes on reasonable grounds that the person may be able to give evidence that may be relevant to the investigation to which the examination or public inquiry relates; and (c) the ICAC suspects on reasonable grounds that the person intends to leave Australia and has possession or control of a passport, whether Australian or foreign, issued to the person. (2) If satisfied by evidence on oath of the matters mentioned in subsection (1), the Supreme Court may order the person to surrender every passport, whether Australian or foreign, held by the (3) If the Supreme Court makes an order under subsection (2): (a) the passport or passports must be given to the ICAC; and (b) the ICAC may retain the passport or passports for the period, not exceeding 1 month, specified in the order.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 50 (4) The Supreme Court, on application by the ICAC, may extend for a further period or periods, not exceeding 1 month each, the period for which the ICAC may retain the passport or passports, but not so that the total period of retention exceeds 3 months. (5) On application by the person, the Supreme Court may at any time revoke an order under subsection (2) and, if so, the ICAC must immediately return the passport or passports to the person. (6) As soon as practicable after an order is made under subsection (2), extended under subsection (4) or revoked under subsection (5), the ICAC must give a copy of the order, extension or revocation to the Commonwealth Minister administering the Australian Passports Act 2005 (Cth).

63 Injunction to refrain from conduct pending investigation (1) On application by the ICAC, the Supreme Court may grant an injunction restraining a person from engaging in conduct that is the subject of, or affects the subject matter of, an investigation or proposed investigation by the ICAC. (2) The Supreme Court may grant an injunction only if satisfied that: (a) the conduct sought to be restrained is likely to impede the investigation or proposed investigation; or (b) it is necessary in the public interest to do so.

64 Exclusion of certain injunctive remedies An action does not lie against the ICAC: (a) to restrain the ICAC from commencing, or continuing to conduct, or to compel the ICAC to commence, or continue to conduct, an investigation or public inquiry; or (b) to restrain the ICAC from making, or to compel the ICAC to make, a referral; or (c) to restrain the ICAC from doing anything under Division 7, or to compel the ICAC to do something under that Division.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 51

65 Restriction on access to ICAC premises and protected ICAC information (1) Despite any law of the Territory to the contrary, a public body or public officer may access ICAC premises or protected ICAC information only: (a) with the ICAC's consent; or (b) with a Supreme Court order made under this section. (2) A public body or public officer wishing to access ICAC premises or protected ICAC information may apply to the Supreme Court for an order authorising the access. (3) The public body or public officer must notify the ICAC of the application and the ICAC may appear and make submissions at the hearing of the application. (4) The Supreme Court may make an order authorising the public body or public officer to access the premises or information, subject to any conditions the Court considers appropriate, if satisfied: (a) accessing the premises or information is necessary for the public body or public officer to perform official functions; and (b) the benefits of the access substantially outweigh the risk of: (i) prejudice to the ICAC in performing the ICAC's functions; or (ii) revealing the identity of a protected person. (5) This section does not apply to access to ICAC premises or protected ICAC information by an authorised officer exercising a power under Part 4. protected ICAC information means information held by the ICAC, the ICAC's Office or a member of ICAC staff in connection with, or as a result of any of the following: (a) an evaluation or review; (b) preliminary inquiries; (c) an investigation; (ca) a protected communication;

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 52 (d) a report, statement or recommendation under Division 7.

66 Power to enter premises of public body or public officer (1) Subject to subsection (2), an authorised officer may enter and remain on premises occupied or used by either of the following at any time for the purpose of performing functions under this Act: (a) a public body; (b) a public officer for official duties. (2) Subsection (1) does not permit an authorised officer to enter or remain on: (a) any part of a premises that is residential premises; or (b) any premises or part of a premises: (i) occupied or used by a public body of a kind mentioned in section 16(1)(l) or a member, officer or employee of such a body; and (ii) not occupied or used by any other type of public body or public officer.

67 Power to enter other premises (1) An authorised officer may enter and remain on premises other than those mentioned in section 66, if the officer believes on reasonable grounds that there is anything that may be evidence of improper conduct on the premises. (2) The power may be exercised: (a) with the consent of the owner or occupier; or (b) with the authority of a search warrant. (3) At the reasonable request of a person apparently in charge of the premises or any other person on the premises, the authorised officer must produce the officer's identity card for inspection.

68 Search warrants (1) An authorised officer may apply to a judicial officer for a search warrant if the officer believes on reasonable grounds that entry to the premises is necessary for the purpose of an investigation.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 53 (2) The application: (a) must specify the investigation to which the warrant relates, including the kind of improper conduct being investigated; and (b) may be made: (i) in person; or (ii) if that is not practical – by telephone, fax or other electronic method. (3) The judicial officer may issue a search warrant to the authorised officer if satisfied by evidence on oath that there are reasonable grounds for the belief mentioned in subsection (1). (4) A search warrant authorises an authorised officer to enter and remain on the premises specified in the warrant for the purpose of carrying out a search of the premises or persons on or about the premises. (5) A search warrant may authorise the exercise of the powers conferred by the warrant: (a) at any time; or (b) subject to limitations as to hours of the day (or night), or other limits as to the time, when the powers may be exercised. (6) A search warrant must specify the date on which it ceases to have effect, which must be not later than 30 days after the date on which it is issued. (7) A search warrant may be executed by the authorised officer to whom it is issued or by another authorised officer. (8) The authorised officer executing a search warrant must produce the warrant for inspection when asked by a person on the premises.

69 Obtaining warrant by telephone or other electronic method (1) This section applies if a judicial officer issues a search warrant on an application under section 68(2)(b)(ii). (2) The judicial officer must: (a) complete and sign the warrant; and (b) inform the authorised officer of its terms; and (c) record on the warrant the reasons for issuing it.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 54 (3) The authorised officer must: (a) complete in duplicate a form of warrant in the terms given under subsection (2)(b); and (b) write on both copies the name of the judicial officer and the date and time the warrant was issued; and (c) send one of the copies to the judicial officer. (4) On receiving the copy, the judicial officer must: (a) compare it with the warrant the judicial officer signed; and (b) if satisfied they are in substance identical, note this fact on the warrant and send the warrant and copy to the ICAC. (5) If the form of the warrant prepared under subsection (3)(a) is in substance identical to the warrant signed by the judicial officer under subsection (2)(a), it has the same authority as a search warrant issued under section 68(3).

70 Entry on Aboriginal land If it is necessary or convenient for an authorised officer to enter land to exercise a power under this Act, the officer may do so for that purpose despite: (a) the land being Aboriginal land as defined in section 3 of the Aboriginal Land Act 1978; and (b) the officer not holding a permit under that Act to enter or remain on the land.

71 Powers of authorised officers while on or about premises (1) An authorised officer who enters premises under this Part may exercise one or more of the following powers: (a) search the premises and examine anything on the premises (opening the thing by force if necessary); (b) take photographs, or make films or audio, video or other recordings, of anything on the premises or found on a person searched under section 73; (c) operate equipment or facilities on the premises; (d) seize anything found on the premises, or on a person searched under section 73, that the authorised officer believes on reasonable grounds may be evidence of improper conduct

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 55 and retain it for as long as may be necessary for one or more of the following purposes: (i) to examine it to determine its evidentiary value; (ii) to copy it; (iii) if it is relevant to an investigation or possible future investigation – for the investigation; (e) issue a notice (a retention notice) requiring that a thing mentioned in paragraph (d) not be moved or interfered with without the approval of an authorised officer; (f) if a thing mentioned in paragraph (d) cannot be conveniently moved – secure it against interference; (g) require a person on or about the premises to do any of the following: (i) state the person's full name, date of birth and how the person may be contacted; (ii) produce evidence of the person's identity; (iii) answer (orally or in writing) questions asked by the authorised officer; (iv) produce a thing the authorised officer believes on reasonable grounds is connected with improper conduct; (v) operate equipment or facilities on the premises; (vi) give the authorised officer any translation, code, password or other information necessary to gain access to, or interpret and understand, anything located or obtained by the officer in the course of exercising the officer's functions under this Part; (via) move to a specified place in the premises or keep a specified distance from a specified person or object; (vii) give other assistance the authorised officer reasonably requires; (h) give directions to a person in charge of a vehicle or vessel in relation to the stopping or movement of the vehicle or vessel.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 56 (2) A person to whom a requirement is made under subsection (1)(g) or a direction is given under subsection (1)(h): (a) must comply with the requirement or direction to the extent the person is able to do so; and (b) if asked to answer a question – must do so to the best of the person's knowledge, information and belief. (3) An offence against subsection (2) is an offence of strict liability. (4) If an authorised officer seizes anything under this section, the officer must issue a receipt and: (a) if the owner or occupier, or a person apparently responsible to the owner or occupier, is present – give the receipt to the owner, occupier or person; or (b) otherwise: (i) leave the receipt on the premises, or in another location agreed with the owner or occupier, in an envelope addressed to the owner or occupier; or (ii) make alternative arrangements with the owner or occupier for delivery of the receipt. (5) While anything seized under this section remains in the ICAC's possession, the ICAC must allow the owner or occupier reasonable access to it.

72 Procedure for retention notices (1) A retention notice: (a) must be given in writing to the owner, or person apparently in control, of the thing to which it relates; and (b) must state that it is an offence to move or interfere with the thing without the approval of an authorised officer. (2) A person commits an offence if: (b) the conduct results in the contravention of a retention notice and the person has knowledge of the result.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 57 (3) If the ICAC subsequently determines that a thing to which a retention notice relates should be seized, an authorised officer may: (a) without warrant, enter and remain on the premises where the thing is reasonably suspected to be located, for the purpose of seizing the thing; and (b) exercise any of the powers in section 71 for that purpose.

73 Search of persons (1) This section applies only if premises are entered under a search warrant. (2) An authorised officer may search a person on or about the premises whom the authorised officer suspects on reasonable grounds has on their person evidence of improper conduct. (3) In searching a person under this section, the authorised officer: (a) may run the officer's hands over the person's outer clothing; and (b) may require the person to remove a coat, jacket, hat or shoes the person is wearing, and may run the officer's hands over the person's remaining outer clothing; and (c) if the officer sees or detects anything the officer suspects on reasonable grounds is, or contains, evidence of improper conduct – may require the person to surrender the thing for inspection; and (d) may use reasonable force to remove a thing from a person if the person does not comply with a requirement to remove or surrender the thing under paragraph (b) or (c); and (e) may inspect a thing that a person has removed or surrendered, or that has been removed from a person; and (f) must conduct the search in a manner that affords, to the extent that the circumstances of the search permit, reasonable privacy to the person being searched; and (g) must conduct the search as quickly as is reasonably practicable in the circumstances. (4) A search must be conducted by a person of the same sex as the person being searched unless it is not reasonable or practicable to do so in the circumstances of the search.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 58

74 Power to require verification and further information from persons providing information to ICAC (1) For the performance of the ICAC's functions under this Act, the ICAC may, at any time, do any of the following: (a) require a person who has provided information to the ICAC to: (i) verify the information by statutory declaration; or (ii) answer questions, or provide further information, in relation to the information; (b) require a person who has made a protected communication to produce items in the person's possession or control that are relevant to the protected communication. (2) A requirement under subsection (1) may be made: (3) A written notice to provide further information or produce an item may require the person to verify the further information or item by statutory declaration. (4) If an item is produced under this section: must allow the person reasonable access to the item.

75 Persons assisting authorised officers (1) An authorised officer entering premises under this Part may be accompanied and assisted by another person. (2) A person assisting the authorised officer may do anything required by the authorised officer that is within the scope of the authorised officer's powers. (3) Anything done lawfully by a person assisting the authorised officer is taken for all purposes to be done by the authorised officer.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 59

76 Arrangements for access to confidential information (1) The ICAC may make arrangements with a public body or public officer: (a) for access by the ICAC and other persons performing functions under this Act to confidential information and databases; and (b) for appropriate protection of the confidentiality of information accessed. (2) A public body or public officer may allow access to information and databases in accordance with an arrangement under subsection (1) despite any obligation of non-disclosure.

77 Power to direct public body or public officer to refrain from action (1) The ICAC may, by written notice, require a public body or public officer to refrain from taking action specified in the notice if the ICAC believes on reasonable grounds that taking the action would, or would be likely to, obstruct the ICAC performing functions under this Act or prejudice a future investigation. (2) A public body or public officer commits an offence if: (a) the public body or public officer intentionally engages in (b) the conduct results in a contravention of a requirement in a notice given to the body or officer under subsection (1) and the public body or public officer has knowledge of the result.

78 Definitions closed session means a part of a public inquiry not open to the public. open session means a part of a public inquiry open to the public.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 60 representation, see the Dictionary to the Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2011.

79 Confidential or privileged information (1) Subject to this Act: (a) no obligation of secrecy or confidentiality or other restriction on disclosing information (imposed by a law of the Territory or otherwise) applies to the giving of evidence; and (b) no privilege exists to protect the refusal or failure to give evidence on grounds of public interest immunity; and (c) no privilege exists in favour of the Territory or a public body (other than a body that is a public body only because of section 16(1)(l)) to protect the refusal or failure to give evidence on grounds of client legal privilege. Note for subsection (1)(c) Client legal privilege for individuals is dealt with in section 80. (2) However, a person is not authorised or required by this Act: (a) to disclose information contrary to section 38 of the Northern Territory Aboriginal Sacred Sites Act 1989; or (b) to disclose confidential information about the decisions, proceedings or deliberations of: (i) the Executive Council or a committee of the Executive Council; or (ii) the Cabinet or a committee of the Cabinet; or (c) to disclose confidential information about communications among members of the Executive Council or Cabinet or among Australian governments; or (d) to produce a document or to disclose information about a document that is exempt under section 45(1)(a) of the Information Act 2002. (3) If, but for subsection (1)(c), the Territory or a public body could claim privilege in relation to information, the ICAC must not make the information available to the public, in a report or otherwise, except to the extent the ICAC considers necessary to explain or support a finding of improper conduct the ICAC has made public.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 61

80 Client legal privilege A witness has a reasonable excuse for refusing or failing to give evidence if the evidence: (a) relates to conduct of the witness or another individual; and (b) is protected by client legal privilege.

81 Privilege against self-incrimination (1) Except as provided by subsection (2) or (3), a witness is not entitled to refuse or fail to give evidence on the ground that the evidence might tend to incriminate the witness or make the witness liable to a penalty. (2) If a witness is currently charged with an offence: (a) the witness is entitled to refuse or fail to give evidence on the ground that the evidence might tend to incriminate the witness in relation to the offence; and (b) the ICAC must inform the witness of that entitlement: (i) before the witness is asked a question, or gives information or produces an item, at an examination or public inquiry; or (ii) otherwise – before the witness is asked a question, or gives information or produces an item, that could reasonably be expected to elicit a representation that might tend to incriminate the witness in relation to the offence. (3) A witness at an open session is also entitled to refuse or fail to give evidence on the ground that the evidence might tend to incriminate the witness in relation to an offence that, in the ICAC's opinion, is not materially relevant to the alleged improper conduct that is the subject of the public inquiry. (4) For a public inquiry, the ICAC must hear submissions about the applicability of subsection (2) or (3) in a closed session if the witness requests.

82 Subsequent use of representations made by witness (1) A representation made by a witness in evidence given to the ICAC or an authorised officer is not admissible in evidence against the witness in a civil or criminal proceeding except a proceeding for an offence against this Act.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 62 (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to evidence given by a witness if, before the person gave the evidence, the ICAC or an authorised officer informed the person that the person was not obliged to give the evidence, but if the person did so, the evidence could be used against them in civil or criminal proceedings. (3) Subsection (1) also does not apply to an item given in evidence to the ICAC or an authorised officer if the item did not come into existence as part of giving evidence to the ICAC or an authorised officer, as long as the item is not relied on to prove that a representation was made in evidence given to the ICAC or an authorised officer. (4) Subsection (3) applies to a copy of an item as if it were the original item. Example for subsection (4) Copies of business records produced at an examination or public inquiry by a witness may be admissible in subsequent proceedings if they are led as evidence of the activities of the business rather than as evidence that they were produced by the witness in giving evidence to the ICAC. (5) Subject to subsection (6), subsection (1) does not prevent the use of a representation made by a witness, or evidence given to the ICAC or an authorised officer by the witness, to locate or identify further evidence which may be used in civil or criminal proceedings. (6) The ICAC must not disclose to a person or body (other than a member of ICAC staff), or seek to elicit or use during an open session, evidence given by the witness at an examination or closed session that tends to incriminate the witness only in relation to a summary offence. (7) Subsection (6) does not apply to evidence in relation to: (a) an offence that involves improper conduct; or (b) an offence the ICAC believes on reasonable grounds raises concerns about a serious ongoing or future threat to a person's health or safety, to public health or to the environment.

83 Parliamentary privilege (1) Parliamentary privilege is limited to the extent that it would otherwise prevent any of the following: (a) a person alleging under this Act that an MLA has engaged or is engaging in improper conduct;

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 63 (b) the ICAC's investigation of an allegation mentioned in paragraph (a), whether or not the allegation is also the subject of a referral to the Speaker or Deputy Speaker; (c) the ICAC making findings in relation to an allegation mentioned in paragraph (a). (2) Subsection (1) does not limit parliamentary privilege in relation to evidence that might be relevant to allegations, investigations or findings mentioned in that subsection.

83A Journalist privilege Despite section 127A of the Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2011: (a) the ICAC is not entitled to determine a claim of privilege under that section despite the ICAC being prescribed as a judicial entity under that Act; and (b) the Supreme Court is instead to determine a claim of privilege to which that section applies made against the ICAC, in accordance with that section and under Division 2.

84 Definitions claimant means a person who is entitled to claim that an item is the subject of privilege or, in the case of parliamentary privilege, means the Legislative Assembly. claimant's representative, for a claimant, means: (a) a person nominated by the claimant; or (b) in the case of the Legislative Assembly: (i) a person nominated by the Legislative Assembly; or (ii) in the absence of a nomination – the Clerk. Clerk means Clerk of the Legislative Assembly. proper officer, in relation to the performance of a function under this Division, means an officer of the Supreme Court appointed by a Supreme Court Judge for that purpose.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 64 secured item means an item sealed in an envelope, or otherwise secured, under section 88(2)(b).

85 Meaning of subject of privilege An item is the subject of privilege if it is, or contains information that is: (a) information or a document mentioned in section 79(2); or (b) the subject of client legal privilege, as provided for in section 80; or (c) the subject of the privilege against self-incrimination, as provided for in section 81; or (d) the subject of parliamentary privilege, as provided for in section 83; or (e) the subject of privilege claimed under section 127A of the Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2011.

86 Notice of potentially privileged material (1) An authorised officer who intends to inspect or view an item the officer considers likely to be the subject of privilege (other than parliamentary privilege) must give reasonable notice to the apparent claimant of the officer's intention. (2) Subsection (1) does not prevent the authorised officer from: (a) seizing or copying an item without viewing any part of it likely to be the subject of privilege; or (b) inspecting or viewing an item using a method reasonably designed to avoid viewing any part of it likely to be the subject of privilege. (3) An authorised officer who intends to inspect, copy or seize, or require a person searched to surrender, an item that the officer considers likely to be the subject of parliamentary privilege must give reasonable notice to the Clerk of the officer's intention.

87 Process for dealing with claim of parliamentary privilege (1) If a memorandum is in effect, an authorised officer must act in accordance with it in relation to a claim that an item the officer wishes to inspect, copy or seize, or require a person searched to surrender, is the subject of parliamentary privilege.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 65 (2) If the matter cannot be resolved in accordance with the memorandum, or if there is no memorandum in effect, the authorised officer must deal with the item in accordance with section 88. memorandum means a memorandum of understanding between the Legislative Assembly and the ICAC in relation to parliamentary privilege.

88 Privilege claims generally (1) This section applies: (a) if, for privilege other than parliamentary privilege: (i) an authorised officer wishes to inspect, copy or seize an item or require a person searched to surrender an item; and (ii) a claimant or claimant's representative claims the item is the subject of privilege; or (b) as mentioned in section 87(2). (2) The authorised officer must consider the claim of privilege and either: (a) cease exercising the power in relation to the item over which the claim of privilege is made; or (b) if the authorised officer believes on reasonable grounds the item may not be the subject of privilege – require the claimant or claimant's representative to immediately seal the item in an envelope, or otherwise secure the item if it cannot be sealed in an envelope, and give the secured item to the officer. (3) The authorised officer must not inspect the item in considering the claim of privilege but may copy the item if it is in electronic form as long as copying the item does not disclose any part of the item that may be privileged to the officer or another person not entitled to view that part of the item. (4) If the authorised officer requires the claimant to give the secured item to the officer under subsection (2)(b), the officer must: (a) notify the ICAC as soon as reasonably practicable; and

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 66 (b) as soon as reasonably practicable, give the secured item to the proper officer to be held in safe custody. (5) Subject to section 90, a person must not open a sealed envelope, or otherwise interfere with a secured item, before delivery to the proper officer. (6) Despite subsection (2)(b), the authorised officer must not require the claimant to give the secured item to the officer under that subsection unless the officer gives the claimant or claimant's representative a reasonable opportunity to accompany the officer in giving the item to the proper officer.

89 Application to Supreme Court to determine privilege (1) Within 7 days after a secured item is given to the proper officer under section 88, an application to determine whether or not the item is the subject of privilege may be made to the Supreme Court: (a) for privilege other than parliamentary privilege – by the claimant or claimant's representative; or (b) for parliamentary privilege – by the ICAC. (2) An application to the Supreme Court to determine whether evidence that the ICAC has, or seeks to obtain, in order to carry out the ICAC's functions is the subject of privilege may be made by the ICAC at any time. (3) If an application is not made within 7 days, the proper officer must give the item: (a) for privilege other than parliamentary privilege – to the ICAC; or (b) for parliamentary privilege – to the Clerk. (4) Within a reasonable time before the hearing of the application: (a) for privilege other than parliamentary privilege – the claimant or claimant's representative must notify the ICAC of the application; or (b) for parliamentary privilege – the ICAC must notify the Clerk of the application. (5) The ICAC is entitled to appear and be heard on the hearing of an application.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 67 (6) The Clerk is entitled to appear and be heard on the hearing of an application relating to parliamentary privilege. (7) If the proper officer gives an item to the ICAC under subsection (3)(a): (a) the claimant is taken to have authorised the ICAC to view the (b) the claimant is not to be taken to have waived privilege for any other purpose.

90 Determination of privilege claim (1) On an application under section 89, the Supreme Court is to determine whether or not the item or other evidence is the subject of privilege in whole or part. (2) For making a determination, the Judge constituting the Supreme Court and any other person authorised by the Court may: (a) open the sealed envelope or otherwise access the item or other evidence; and (b) inspect the item or other evidence. (3) If the Supreme Court determines that the whole of the item or other evidence is the subject of privilege, the Court must order that the item or other evidence be returned to the claimant or claimant's representative. (4) If the Supreme Court determines that the whole of the item or other evidence is not the subject of privilege the Court must order that the item or other evidence be given to the ICAC. (5) If the Supreme Court determines that part of the item or other evidence is the subject of privilege (the privileged part) and part is not (the non-privileged part): (a) if the item or other evidence is able to be divided into the privileged part and the non-privileged part – the Court must divide the item or other evidence and order that the privileged part be returned to the claimant or claimant's representative and the non-privileged part be given to the ICAC; or

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 68 (b) if paragraph (a) does not apply but the Court considers it possible to produce a copy of the item or other evidence from which the privileged part has been removed: (i) the Court must make orders the Court considers appropriate for production of the copy; and (ii) the Court must order that the copy be given to the ICAC and the item or other evidence be returned to the claimant or claimant's representative; or (c) otherwise – the Court must order that the item or other evidence be returned to the claimant or claimant's representative. (6) Except as provided in subsection (2), a person must not open a sealed envelope containing the item or other evidence, or otherwise have access to the item or other evidence, before: (a) the Supreme Court determines the claim of privilege; or (b) the item or other evidence is returned to the claimant. (7) A person commits an offence if: (b) the conduct results in a contravention of subsection (6) and the person is reckless in relation to the result. 12 months.

91 Whistleblower protection principles (1) It is intended that this Act be administered according to the following principles: (a) public bodies have the primary responsibility for providing protected persons with protection and support; (b) the ICAC's role is to provide guidance as to how public bodies can fulfil this responsibility and to take action if the ICAC considers a public body is not fulfilling its responsibility;

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 69 (c) wherever possible, the identity of a protected person should be kept confidential, as anonymity is the best protection of a person from retaliation; (d) the principle that public bodies of the Territory are, and are to act as, model litigants in proceedings, including disciplinary proceedings. (2) This section does not create any legal rights in any person or give rise to any civil cause of action.

92 Meaning of protected action (1) A person takes protected action if: (a) the person, being an individual, makes a protected communication; or (b) the person (whether or not an individual) takes another action in the course of, or for the purpose of: (i) complying with this Act; or (ii) cooperating with a person or body performing functions under this Act. (2) Despite subsection (1), an action is not protected action to the extent the action involves the provision or communication of information the person taking the action knows or believes is misleading information.

93 Meaning of protected communication (1) A protected communication is: (a) information in a report made by an individual to the ICAC in accordance with directions or guidelines under section 22; or (b) information mentioned in subsection (2) that is provided by an individual to any of the following: (i) the ICAC or the ICAC's Office; (ii) the Ombudsman or the Ombudsman's Office; (iii) the Auditor-General or the Auditor-General's Office; (iv) the Health and Community Complaints Commissioner or a staff member of the Commissioner; (v) the Children's Commissioner;

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 70 (vi) the Environment Protection Authority; (vii) if the information relates to the ICAC, the ICAC's Office or a member of ICAC staff – the Inspector or a member of Inspector staff; (viii) if the information relates to a police officer – the Commissioner of Police; (ix) if the information relates to an MLA other than the Speaker, including a minister – the Speaker; (x) if the information relates to the Speaker – the Deputy Speaker; (xi) if the information relates to the Chief Justice – the next senior Supreme Court Judge; (xii) if the information relates to a Supreme Court Judge, other than the Chief Justice, or to the Chief Judge – the Chief Justice; (xiii) if the information relates to a Local Court Judge other than the Chief Judge – the Chief Judge; (xiv) if the information relates to a contravention of the Electoral Act 2004 – the Electoral Commissioner; (xv) if the information relates to an employee or officer of a public body – the entity with responsibility for the management and control of the public body or a nominated recipient in their capacity as a nominated recipient for the public body; (xvi) if the information relates to a contravention of the Public Sector Employment and Management Act 1993 – the Commissioner as defined in section 3(1) of that Act; or (c) an action declared under section 94 to be a protected (2) For subsection (1)(b), the information is information the individual believes on reasonable grounds: (a) would tend to show that improper conduct has occurred, is occurring or is at risk of occurring; or (b) would assist the ICAC to perform the ICAC's functions; or

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 71 (c) would otherwise assist in the administration, or achieving the objects, of this Act. (3) It is irrespective: (a) whether a protected communication is made orally or in writing; and (b) whether or not a protected communication is made anonymously; and (c) whether a protected communication is being investigated by the ICAC or is referred to another entity for investigation. (4) For a protected communication mentioned in subsection (1)(a), subsection (3) is subject to any contrary provision in the directions or guidelines under section 22. (4A) Despite anything to the contrary in this section, information is not a protected communication unless: (a) the person providing the information indicates that: (i) the information is being provided as a protected communication; or (ii) in the case of a person mentioned in subsection (1)(b) – the information is being provided to the person in the person's capacity as a nominated recipient; or (b) the recipient otherwise determines that the information is a protected communication. staff member, in relation to the Health and Community Complaints Commissioner, see section 4(1) of the Health and Community Services Complaints Act 1998.

94 Declaration of protected communication (1) An individual may apply to the ICAC for a declaration that an action taken by the individual that involves an allegation of improper conduct is a protected communication. (2) The ICAC may, by written notice to the applicant, declare the action to be a protected communication, whether or not the action would otherwise be a protected communication.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 72 (3) In determining whether to declare an action to be a protected communication, the ICAC must take into account the following matters: (a) the seriousness of the improper conduct alleged; (b) whether the applicant believed, and had reasonable grounds for believing, the information alleged was reliable; (c) whether the action was consistent with the processes and practices of a public body; (d) whether the applicant believed, and had reasonable grounds for believing, the entity to which the allegation was made had statutory responsibility for dealing with improper conduct of the kind alleged; (e) whether an alternative process for reporting improper conduct was available and the applicant ought reasonably have used that process instead of taking the action; (f) whether the applicant believed, and had reasonable grounds for believing, the applicant was following any requirements for making a protected communication; (g) the extent to which the applicant believed that taking the action would genuinely assist in preventing, reducing or dealing with improper conduct; (h) whether taking the action was a reasonable preparatory step to, or reasonable part of, taking another action that is protected action; (i) the actual and potential adverse impact on the public interest or the interests of any person caused by the action; (j) whether taking the action was reasonable in all the circumstances. (4) An applicant or the ICAC may give a copy of a notice under subsection (2) to any person or body. (5) In addition, the ICAC may direct a public body to ensure that the content of a notice under subsection (2) is brought to the attention of: (a) any persons specified by the ICAC; and

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 73 (b) any other person who may be in a position to engage in retaliation for the action to which the notice relates or to prevent or deal with retaliation. (6) The rules of natural justice (including any duty of procedural fairness) do not apply to the ICAC in determining whether to declare an action to be a protected communication to the extent complying with those rules would be likely to: (a) reveal the identity of a protected person or otherwise put a protected person at increased risk of retaliation; or (b) involve a risk that the individual who took the action would suffer retaliation before the declaration is made. (7) The ICAC may, by written notice to an individual, vary or revoke a notice under subsection (2) if, as a result of further information, the ICAC considers the action taken or part of the action taken ought not be a protected communication. (8) Variation or revocation of the declaration does not affect the status of the protected communication if it would be a protected communication even if the declaration had not been made.

95 Meaning of engage in retaliation (1) A person engages in retaliation against another person (the victim) if the person causes, or threatens to cause, harm to the victim: (a) with the intention of discouraging the victim or a third person from taking protected action; or (b) with the intention of discouraging the victim or a third person from supporting a protected person; or (c) because of protected action taken, or suspected by the person to have been taken, by the victim; or (d) because of action taken, or suspected by the person to have been taken, by the victim to support a protected person. (2) An intention or reason mentioned in subsection (1)(a) to (d) is a prohibited reason. (3) It is irrelevant whether or not the victim is a protected person. support includes assist and encourage.

Division 2 Responsibilities relating to protected communications Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 74 Division 2 Responsibilities relating to protected 96 ICAC to issue directions and guidelines for dealing with voluntary protected communications (1) The ICAC must issue directions and guidelines governing how a recipient of a voluntary protected communication is to deal with the (2) The directions and guidelines may: (a) require the recipient to report the communication to the ICAC to the extent it involves suspected improper conduct involving corrupt conduct, anti-democratic conduct or retaliation; and (b) encourage the recipient to report the communication to the ICAC to the extent it involves other suspected improper (c) require the recipient to take action to minimise the risk of retaliation in relation to the communication. (3) The directions and guidelines may be included as part of directions and guidelines issued under section 22 or issued separately. voluntary protected communication means a protected communication made otherwise than in compliance with a direction under section 22 to report suspected improper conduct.

97 Nominated recipient (1) The person responsible for the management or control of a public body may nominate an eligible person to be the nominated recipient for the public body for this Part. (2) A person is eligible for nomination if: (a) the person is a public officer; and (b) the person responsible for the management or control of a public body is satisfied the person has suitable skills and training to be the nominated recipient. (3) A nomination: (a) must be in writing; and

Division 2 Responsibilities relating to protected communications Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 75 (b) must specify the period for which the nomination has effect. (4) The same person may be appointed as the nominated recipient for more than one public body. (5) The person responsible for the management or control of a public body must notify the ICAC of a nomination, the expiry of a nomination or the revocation of a nomination as soon as practicable after the nomination is made, expires or is revoked. (6) Notice of a nomination must include the name and contact details of the nominated recipient and the period of the nomination.

98 Information to be given to purported protected person (1) As soon as practicable after receiving a purported protected communication, the recipient must give the person who made the communication a written notice setting out: (a) a statement that the communication has been received; and (b) the date of receipt; and (c) an indication of the content of the communication; and (d) a statement that the communication is or may be a protected communication; and (e) information about the ICAC's role and contact details for the ICAC's Office. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if, despite making efforts that are reasonable in the circumstances, the recipient is unable to contact the person who made a protected communication. Example for subsection (2) It may not be possible to contact a person who made a protected communication anonymously. (3) In addition to the notice required by subsection (1), the recipient must make reasonable efforts to inform the person who made a protected communication of the matters specified in Schedule 2. (4) For a protected communication made to the person responsible for the management or control of a public body, the person's obligations under this section may be fulfilled by the nominated recipient for the public body.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 76 (5) This section does not apply in relation to a communication that is a protected communication only because it is the subject of a declaration under section 94(2).

Division 3 Protection from liability

99 Protection from liability – taking protected action (1) A protected person: (a) incurs no civil or criminal liability by taking protected action; and (b) does not become liable to disciplinary action, or other adverse administrative action, for taking protected action. (2) In an action for defamation, protected action is absolutely privileged. (3) Subsections (1) and (2) apply even if the protected action is taken in breach of an obligation of confidentiality. (4) Despite anything to the contrary in this Part, when a person takes protected action, the person's liability for the person's own conduct (other than conduct consisting of taking the protected action) is not affected.

100 Offence to engage in retaliation (b) the conduct is retaliation and the person is reckless in relation to that circumstance. (2) For subsection (1), if the retaliation consists of a threat to cause (a) the prosecution must prove that the person: (i) intended the victim to fear the threat would be carried out; or

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 77 (ii) was reckless as to the victim fearing the threat would be carried out; but (b) it is not necessary to prove that the victim actually feared the threat would be carried out. (3) In a prosecution for an offence against subsection (1) consisting of conduct mentioned in section 95(1)(a) or (b), it is not necessary to prove that the victim or third person was actually discouraged from taking protected action or providing support. (4) It is a defence to a prosecution for an offence against (a) the defendant's conduct was otherwise legal and was taken substantially for a reason other than a prohibited reason; or (b) the defendant believed on reasonable grounds the information provided by the protected person that led to the defendant's conduct was false or misleading. (5) A prosecution for an offence against subsection (1) must be started within 2 years after the offence is alleged to have been committed.

101 Offence to engage in retaliation in course of management (1) A person (person A) commits an offence if: (a) person A is a public officer; and (b) person A intentionally engages in conduct; and (c) the conduct is retaliation against another person (person B) and person A is reckless in relation to that circumstance; and (d) person B is a person under the management, supervision or control of person A in person A's capacity as a public officer; and (e) the retaliation is engaged in in circumstances connected to person A's management, supervision or control of person B; and (f) person A has knowledge of the circumstances mentioned in paragraphs (d) and (e).

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 78 (3) For subsection (1), if the retaliation consists of a threat to cause (a) the prosecution must prove that person A: (i) intended person B to fear the threat would be carried out; or (ii) was reckless as to person B fearing the threat would be carried out; but (b) it is not necessary to prove that person B actually feared the threat would be carried out. (4) In a prosecution for an offence against subsection (1) consisting of conduct mentioned in section 95(1)(a) or (b), it is not necessary to prove that person B or a third person was actually discouraged from taking protected action or providing support. (5) It is a defence to a prosecution for an offence against (a) person A's conduct was otherwise legal and was taken substantially for a reason other than a prohibited reason; or (b) person A believed that the conduct was a reasonable way of carrying out person A's role and responsibilities as a public (c) person A believed on reasonable grounds the information provided by the protected person that led to the conduct was false or misleading. (6) Person A has a legal burden of proof in relation to the matters mentioned in subsection (5).

102 Compensation for retaliation (1) A person who engages in retaliation is liable to pay an amount to the victim as compensation for the retaliation. (2) Compensation may be recovered: (a) as for damages for a tort in a court of competent jurisdiction; or (b) if within the small claims jurisdiction of the Tribunal – as a small claim in the Tribunal.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 79 (3) A court or the Tribunal may award an amount in the nature of exemplary damages in proceedings under this section. (4) In determining proceedings for compensation for retaliation, the court or Tribunal must take into account: (a) the reasonableness of the conduct of each party in the circumstances leading to the retaliation and the circumstances of the retaliation; and (b) any conduct of a party that contributed to, or mitigated, the harm caused by the retaliation. (5) Proceedings for compensation for retaliation does not preclude other forms of relief. (6) A victim may bring proceedings under this section even if the defendant has not been, or cannot be, prosecuted for an offence against section 100 in relation to the retaliation. small claims jurisdiction, see section 3 of the Small Claims Act 2016.

103 Injunctive remedies for retaliation (1) The Supreme Court may grant injunctive remedies for retaliation as follows: (a) the Court may grant a mandatory injunction requiring a person who has engaged in retaliation to take specified action to remedy any harm suffered by the victim; (b) the Court may grant an injunction to prevent a person engaging in retaliation. (2) An application may be made for an injunctive remedy under this section by: (b) the victim or prospective victim of the retaliation or apprehended retaliation. (3) In an appropriate case, the Supreme Court may make an order in the nature of an interim injunction under this section.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 80

104 Facilitating access to justice for victims of retaliation (1) This section applies to: (a) proceedings for compensation under section 102; or (b) proceedings for an injunctive remedy under section 103. (2) The court or Tribunal hearing the proceedings must consider, taking into account the matters mentioned in subsection (3), whether to exercise a power of the court or Tribunal: (a) to hold the proceedings in private; and (b) to prohibit the publication of evidence or information that may identify the victim or prospective victim. (3) The matters the court or Tribunal must take into account are: (a) the extent to which the identity of the victim or prospective victim is known; and (b) the increased risk of harm to the victim or prospective victim if their identity were more widely known as a result of the proceedings. (4) In addition to any other order the court or Tribunal may make, it may order that an apology be made, publicly or in private, to the victim or prospective victim, if the court or Tribunal considers an apology may assist to mitigate harm or prevent future harm to the victim or prospective victim. (5) For proceedings in a court, the court may award costs against the victim or prospective victim only if satisfied: (a) the victim or prospective victim issued the proceedings vexatiously or without reasonable cause; or (b) unreasonable conduct by the victim or prospective victim caused another party to incur the costs. Note for subsection (5) For costs in proceedings in the Civil and Administrative Tribunal, see Part 4,

Division 6 of the Northern Territory Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2014.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 81

105 Vicarious liability for retaliation (1) If an employee of a public body engages in retaliation in the course of employment, both the employee and the public body are jointly and severally liable for the retaliation and proceedings may be taken under section 102 against either or both. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the public body proves that it took all reasonable steps to prevent the employee from doing the act referred to in that subsection. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2) and without limiting the matters that may be taken into account in determining whether the public body has taken all reasonable steps, the following matters are to be considered: (a) the provision by the public body of training aimed at preventing or decreasing retaliation; (b) the development and implementation by the public body of policies aimed at preventing or decreasing retaliation; (c) the financial circumstances of the public body; (d) the number of employees of the public body. (4) If a court or the Tribunal finds that a public body is liable under subsection (1) for retaliation, the court or Tribunal must, before making an order for compensation: (a) consider the extent of steps taken by the public body to prevent the retaliation; and (b) take those steps into account in determining the proportion of the amount to be paid as compensation by the public body.

106 Guidelines to minimise retaliation (1) The ICAC must issue, and keep under review, guidelines for public bodies and public officers concerning frameworks and practices for minimising risks of retaliation. (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the guidelines may include measures for: (a) education and training; and

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 82 (b) policies and processes; and (c) allocating responsibility and resources; and (d) creating a suitable organisational culture; and (e) managing situations in which persons are, or are likely to be, at risk of retaliation. (3) The guidelines must include a requirement for a public body or public officer who receives a protected communication to keep the person who made the communication reasonably informed: (a) in relation to steps taken to deal with the protected communication; and (b) as to whether the matter has been reported to the ICAC. (4) The ICAC must issue the guidelines within 12 months after the commencement of this section.

107 Direction regarding action to protect persons from retaliation (1) Subject to subsection (2), the ICAC may give a written direction to a public body or public officer to do any of the following: (a) arrange for a public officer to be offered an opportunity to relocate to a suitable role in a different work unit or location; (b) manage any risks that a particular person, or persons of a particular group, will be the subject of retaliation; (c) take any other action or refrain from taking any action. Section 151 creates an offence for contravening a direction under this section. (2) The ICAC may give a direction under this section only if satisfied that: (a) the direction would: (i) assist in reducing the risk of retaliation; or (ii) assist in mitigating harm suffered as a result of retaliation or preventing harm as a result of possible future retaliation; and (b) it is reasonable in all the circumstances to give the direction, taking into account the nature and resources of the public body or public officer.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 83 (3) Subject to subsection (4), before giving a direction under this section to a public body or public officer, the ICAC: (a) must consult: (i) for a public body – the person responsible for the management or control of a public body; or (ii) for a public officer – the public officer; and (b) may consult the Commissioner for Public Employment. (4) Subsection (3) does not apply to the extent that complying with that subsection would be likely to: (a) reveal the identity of a protected person or otherwise put a protected person at increased risk of retaliation; or (b) involve a risk that a person would suffer retaliation before the direction is given. (5) The ICAC may give a direction under this section to an independent public body or public officer only if the ICAC believes on reasonable grounds the direction will have no more than a minimal negative impact on the body or officer taking into account their nature and resources. (6) The ICAC may, in writing, vary or revoke a direction under this section if, as a result of further information, the ICAC considers the direction is no longer appropriate. independent public body or public officer means: (a) a public body that does not represent the Territory or is not otherwise controlled by the Territory or by another public body that represents the Territory; or (b) a public officer: (i) who does not represent the Territory; or (ii) who is a member, officer or employee of a public body mentioned in paragraph (a).

108 Supreme Court may vary or revoke direction (1) A public body or public officer may, at any time, apply to the Supreme Court to vary or revoke a direction given to the body or officer under section 107.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 84 (2) On an application, the Supreme Court may, by order, do any of the following if satisfied as mentioned in subsection (3): (a) vary the direction; (b) revoke the direction; (c) revoke the direction and substitute a direction the ICAC could have given under section 107. (3) The Supreme Court must be satisfied that: (a) non-compliance with the direction is urgently required to take action to prevent substantial harm to a person or to essential public interests; or (b) both of the following apply: (i) non-compliance with the direction is reasonable to perform the essential functions of the public body or public officer; (ii) the public body or public officer has taken reasonable steps to minimise the risk of retaliation to a person or to protect a person who may be at risk of retaliation. (4) If the Supreme Court substitutes a direction under subsection (2)(c), the new direction is taken to be a direction by the ICAC under section 107.

109 Parties and procedure (1) This section applies for proceedings for an order under section 108. (2) The parties to the proceedings are: (a) the applicant; and (b) a protected person, or other person who may be at risk of retaliation, who may be affected by the variation or revocation of the direction to which the proceedings relate; and (c) the ICAC; and (d) if the Commissioner for Public Employment applies to be joined – the Commissioner for Public Employment. (3) The Supreme Court must consider, taking into account the matters mentioned in subsection (4), whether to exercise a power: (a) to hold the proceedings in private; and

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 85 (b) to prohibiting the publication of evidence or information that may identify a protected person or other person who may be at risk of retaliation. (4) The matters the Supreme Court must take into account are: (a) the extent to which the identity of a protected person, or other person who may be at risk of retaliation, is known; and (b) the increased risk of harm to a protected person, or other person who may be at risk of retaliation, if their identity were more widely known as a result of the proceedings. (5) In addition to subsection (3), the Supreme Court may hear evidence from a party in private, and without disclosing the evidence to another party, if the Court is satisfied that this is necessary: (a) to keep the identity of a protected person, or other person who may be at risk of retaliation, confidential; or (b) to protect the confidentiality of a current or possible future investigation by the ICAC. (6) If the Supreme Court is considering hearing evidence from a party in private without disclosing it to another party, the Court may: (a) notify the Inspector; and (b) require any material relevant to the proceedings to be made available to the Inspector; and (c) permit the Inspector to appear in the proceedings and, for the purpose of testing the appropriateness or validity of the direction the subject of the proceedings: (i) ask a witness questions; and (ii) make submissions. (7) The Supreme Court may permit the Inspector to ask questions or make submissions under subsection (6)(c) in the absence of a party or a party's legal representative even if the party's interests may be affected by the subject matter of the questions or submissions. (8) The Supreme Court may award costs against a party who is a protected person, or other person who may be at risk of retaliation, only if satisfied: (a) the party issued the proceedings vexatiously or without reasonable cause; or

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 86 (b) the party's unreasonable conduct caused another party to incur the costs.

110 Evaluations and reviews (1) The ICAC may, at any time, evaluate or review a public body to determine: (a) whether the public body is complying, or has complied, with directions and is adhering, or has adhered, to guidelines under this Part; or (b) whether a particular person, or persons in a particular group, are at risk of retaliation. (2) Despite subsection (1), the ICAC cannot evaluate or review a court or judicial officer in relation to the performance of judicial functions. (3) For an evaluation or review, the ICAC may exercise the powers set out in Part 4. (4) The ICAC must provide a report in relation to the results of the evaluation or review to a person with responsibility for the public body the subject of the evaluation or review. (5) The ICAC is not required to include in a report mentioned in subsection (4) any information that may prejudice a current or future investigation, prosecution or disciplinary action.

111 Recommendations (1) The ICAC may, at any time, make recommendations to a public body for: (a) the improved compliance with directions, or improved adherence to guidelines, under this Part; or (b) the improved management of risks of retaliation. (2) Sections 57 and 58 apply to recommendations made under this section as if they were recommendations made under section 56.

112 ICAC may arrange protection and require police assistance (1) This section applies if the ICAC considers that a person is at risk of intimidation, harassment or harm because the person: (a) is a protected person; or

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 87 (b) is suspected of being a protected person; or (c) is connected with a person who is a protected person or suspected of being a protected person. (2) The ICAC may take any action the ICAC considers necessary or desirable for the protection of the person, including: (a) directing the Commissioner of Police to: (i) provide protection to the person; or (ii) assist the ICAC to provide protection to the person; or (iii) provide personnel or facilities to the ICAC for the provision of protection to the person; or (b) making arrangements with another person or body to provide protection to the person. (3) Despite subsection (2)(a), the ICAC cannot direct the Commissioner of Police to provide protection by including a person in the TWPP. Under section 8(1) of the Witness Protection (Northern Territory) Act 2002 the Commissioner of Police has the sole responsibility of deciding whether to include a person in the TWPP. (4) The ICAC must keep any direction issued under subsection (2)(a) under reasonable review. (5) The Commissioner of Police, at any time, may apply to the ICAC to review a direction given under subsection (2)(a). (6) If the Commissioner of Police applies to the ICAC under subsection (5), the ICAC must review the direction and decide whether to confirm, vary or revoke the direction. harm, see section 1A of the Criminal Code. TWPP, see section 3(1) of the Witness Protection (Northern Territory) Act 2002.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 88

112A Interpretation (1) In this Part: non-NT political party means an organisation (whether incorporated or unincorporated), an object or activity of which is the promotion of the election to the Parliament of another Territory, a State or the Commonwealth of a candidate or candidates endorsed by it. recent political affiliation, see subsection (2). reportable donation means a gift or loan that is required to be disclosed or reported under Part 10 of the Electoral Act 2004 or under a similar law in force in the Commonwealth or in a State or another Territory. (2) For this Part, a person has a recent political affiliation if, at any time during the previous 10 years, the person: (a) was a member of the Legislative Assembly or a local government council; or (b) was an office holder or elected representative of a political party or a non-NT political party; or (c) was a member of staff of a minister or of the Leader of the Opposition; or (d) was a member of electorate office staff for an MLA; or (e) was a member of a political party or a non-NT political party; or (f) made a reportable donation to any of the following: (i) a political party; (ii) a non-NT political party; (iii) an associated entity of a political party; (iv) an entity that is equivalent to an associated entity in relation to a non-NT political party. (3) For subsection (2)(f), a person made a reportable donation if it was

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 89 made by the person or by a body corporate of which the person was an office holder or majority shareholder at the time the donation was made.

113 Appointment of ICAC (1) The Administrator may appoint an eligible person to be the ICAC. (2) The appointment may be made only after receiving a recommendation of the Legislative Assembly. (3) The ICAC Minister must table a copy of the appointment in the Legislative Assembly within 6 sitting days after the appointment is made.

114 Eligibility for appointment (1) A person is an eligible person for appointment as the ICAC if: (a) the person is: (i) a former judge of a superior Court; or (ii) a lawyer who has been admitted to the legal profession for at least 10 years; and (b) the person is not: (i) a judicial officer; or (ii) a member of an Australian parliament; or (iii) a member of a local government council or of an equivalent body in a State or another Territory; and (c) the person does not have a recent political affiliation; and (d) the person is not, and has not been during the previous 2 years, an Acting ICAC appointed under section 121(2). (4) If a person who is a public officer (other than as the ICAC) is appointed as the ICAC, the person cannot perform any functions as the ICAC while the person remains a public officer.

115 Term of appointment (1) The appointment of a person as the ICAC is for a period of 5 years. (2) A person who is the ICAC may be reappointed, if still eligible, for

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 90 one further period of 5 years.

116 Conditions of appointment (1) Subject to Division 1A, the ICAC holds office on the conditions (including conditions about remuneration, expenses and allowances) determined by the Administrator. (2) The ICAC's conditions of office: (a) cannot provide any conditions (for example as to remuneration) that are contingent on the ICAC's performance in office; and (b) cannot be varied during the ICAC's term in office.

117 Leave of absence The ICAC Minister may grant the ICAC leave of absence on the conditions decided by the ICAC Minister.

118 Vacancy in office (1) The office of ICAC becomes vacant if: (a) the ICAC resigns under section 119; or (b) the ICAC's appointment is terminated under section 120; or (c) the ICAC is: (i) found guilty of an offence, whether in the Territory or elsewhere, for which the maximum penalty is imprisonment for a term of at least 12 months, with or without a fine; or (ii) sentenced to imprisonment for an offence, whether in the Territory or elsewhere and whether or not the sentence is suspended; or (d) the ICAC becomes bankrupt, applies to take the benefit of a law for the relief of bankrupt or insolvent debtors, compounds with creditors or makes an assignment of remuneration for their benefit; or (e) the ICAC becomes a candidate for election as a member of an Australian parliament or a local government council; or (f) the ICAC becomes a public officer (other than through reappointment as the ICAC); or

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 91 (g) the ICAC is no longer an eligible person for appointment. (2) A decision made, or other thing done, by the ICAC is not invalid only because the ICAC is no longer, or never was, an eligible person for appointment.

119 Resignation The ICAC may resign office by written notice given to the Administrator.

120 Suspension and termination of appointment (1) The Administrator may suspend the ICAC from duty if: (a) the ICAC becomes physically or mentally incapable of satisfactorily performing official duties; or (b) the ICAC engages in corrupt conduct; or (c) the ICAC engages in paid employment outside the duties of office without the ICAC Minister's approval; or (d) the ICAC is absent from duty, without the approval of the ICAC Minister and without reasonable excuse, for 28 consecutive days or for 42 days in any 12 months. (2) The ICAC Minister must immediately give the ICAC a statement of reasons for the suspension. (3) The ICAC Minister must table in the Legislative Assembly the statement and any written response by the ICAC within 6 sitting days after the suspension. (4) If, within 6 sitting days after the statement is tabled, a resolution of the Legislative Assembly is passed by a two-thirds majority of all of the Assembly requiring the Administrator to terminate the ICAC's appointment, the Administrator must terminate the ICAC's appointment. (5) The suspension of the ICAC is lifted if: (a) the ICAC Minister does not table the statement under subsection (3); or (b) the Legislative Assembly does not pass a resolution in accordance with subsection (4). (6) The ICAC is entitled to be paid remuneration and allowances during the period of suspension.

Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2017 92

121 Acting ICAC (1) The Administrator may appoint an eligible person for appointment as the ICAC to act as the ICAC: (a) during a vacancy in the office; or (b) during a period, or all periods, when the ICAC (or another Acting ICAC) is unable, or unavailable, to perform official duties. (2) The Administrator may appoint a person (including the Inspector) to act as the ICAC to investigate the conduct of the ICAC, the ICAC's Office or a member of ICAC staff, if the person: (a) is an eligible person for appointment as the ICAC; and (b) is not, and has never been, a public officer. (5) An Acting ICAC holds office on the conditions (including conditions about remuneration, expenses and allowances) determined by the Administrator. (6) Section 114(4) does not apply to an Acting ICAC, but an Acting ICAC cannot investigate a matter involving the conduct of: (a) a public body in which they are employed or hold office; or (b) a public body or public officer to which they provide services under any form of arrangement; or (c) if the Acting ICAC is a public sector employee – a judicial (7) Concurrent appointments may exist under this section if the conditions of appointment distinguish the circumstances in which each appointee may act. Example for subsection (7) A person could be appointed as Acting ICAC in relation to a particular matter if the ICAC is unable to perform the ICAC's functions in relation to that matter and another person could be appointed as Acting ICAC in relation to another such matter being dealt with at the same time.