Protection of the Environment Operations (Underground Petroleum Storage Systems) Regulation 2019
In ForceNSW
Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Act Number
411 of 2019
Collection
regulation
Plain English Summary
6/10 complexity
This Regulation sets technical, testing, monitoring, reporting and record‑keeping rules for underground petroleum storage systems. It makes the person responsible for a system (the manager/operator or, if unknown, the landowner) obtain design, installation and integrity testing from a “duly qualified person”, install approved leak‑detection equipment, maintain a fuel system operation plan, run regular tests, keep specified records for seven years and notify local authorities on decommissioning. The EPA issues guidelines and the appropriate regulatory authority may grant exemptions.
This Regulation sets minimum regulatory requirements for underground petroleum storage systems in New South Wales. It prescribes who is the “person responsible” for a storage system, the conditions under which a new, modified or repaired storage system may be commissioned, mandatory leak‑detection arrangements, operational documentation and monitoring systems, reporting and record‑keeping obligations, and the power of the appropriate regulatory authority to issue exemptions and guidelines. The Regulation commenced on 1 September 2019 and replaces the 2014 Regulation (cl 2, cl 31).
Mechanically, the Regulation does the following (selected elements grounded in the text):
Defines key vocabulary and thresholds (cl 3), including “storage system”, “person responsible”, “duly qualified person”, “significant modification”, and the exclusion of liquefied petroleum gas systems and wholly above‑ground tank systems (cl 3, cl 5).
Makes commissioning of new, modified or repaired systems contingent on design and installation by a “duly qualified person”, provision of lists of industry standards and specifications, current “as‑built” drawings, and completion of equipment integrity testing with certification provided to the person responsible (cl 6-9, cl 10-14).
Requires installation and operation of a leak detection system on site, either groundwater monitoring wells or an alternative system, with design and testing obligations and particular installation standards for wells (Part 3, cl 15-17).
Requires a fuel system operation plan to be in place and complied with before a system is used, including a loss monitoring system, incident management procedure, maintenance schedule, drawings and detailed contact and site information (cl 18).
Imposes operational duties to check and maintain measuring instruments, to record instrument data, to undertake periodic sampling and testing of groundwater or alternative systems, and to act within specified timeframes to investigate and stop leaks (cl 19-21).
Current sections
Direct links to the current provisions in Protection of the Environment Operations (Underground Petroleum Storage Systems) Regulation 2019.
commission, in relation to a storage system or leak detection system, means to bring the system into use for the first time following its installation, modification or repair.
current “as-built” drawings, in relation to a storage system, means drawings that depict the current configuration of the system in relation to the storage site.
decommission, in relation to a storage system, means to remove the system or to render the system permanently unusable.
Note.
Other legislation may require the cessation of the use of certain storage systems.
duly qualified person, in relation to any activity, means a person who has competence and experience in relation to that activity that is—
(a) recognised by a peak body in the relevant industry as appropriate for that activity, or
(b) recognised generally in the relevant industry as appropriate for that activity.
EPA guideline means a guideline in force under clause 30.
fuel system operation plan means documentation for a storage system that contains the procedures and other information required by clause 18.
installation of a storage system means the original installation of the system on the storage site, and includes any work in the vicinity of the storage site necessary for the installation, and anything done to the system before it is commissioned.
leak, in relation to a storage system, means any loss of petroleum from the system because it is not providing full and continuous containment of petroleum.
leak detection system means a system designed to detect contamination by, or failure of, a storage system in the event of a failure in loss monitoring systems that consists of either—
(a) groundwater monitoring wells, or
(b) an alternative leak detection system.
loss monitoring system for a storage system means the system referred to in clause 18(2)(a) as included in the fuel system operation plan for the system.
modification of a storage system includes any upgrade, extension, alteration or replacement of the system, or any component of the system, but does not include—
(a) anything done to the system before it is first commissioned, or
(b) anything done to the system after it is decommissioned, or
(c) anything done to the system as part of routine maintenance (including any repairs to the system that are done in the course of regular scheduled upkeep of the system), or
(d) anything done to the system before 1 June 2008, or
(e) anything done to a storage site, or any building on a storage site, that does not directly affect the system.
modified storage system means a storage system that has been modified.
person responsible for a storage system—see clause 4.
petroleum means any fuel that consists predominantly of a mixture of hydrocarbons, whether or not the fuel includes additives (such as ethanol), and includes used oil.
Note.
Clause 5 provides that this Regulation does not apply to a liquefied petroleum gas storage system.
significant modification of a storage system means any modification to the system that results in—
(a) the replacement of the whole of the system, or
(b) the replacement of a half or more of the tanks in the system.
storage site of a storage system means the premises (or the part of the premises) in or on which the system is situated.
storage system means a system of tanks, pipes, valves and other equipment that is designed—
(a) to contain petroleum, or
(b) to control the passage of petroleum into, out of, through or within the system,
and includes any structure through which petroleum routinely passes from one part of the system to another.
use a storage system includes allow petroleum to remain in the system.
Note.
The Act and the Interpretation Act 1987 contain definitions and other provisions that affect the interpretation and application of this Regulation.
For example, appropriate regulatory authority is defined in section 6 of the Act. When this Regulation commenced, the EPA was the appropriate regulatory authority for matters arising under this Regulation in relation to some existing notices, directions or requirements: see clause 91 of the Protection of the Environment Operations (General) Regulation 2009. Otherwise the default position in section 6 of the Act had effect.
(2) Notes included in this Regulation do not form part of this Regulation.
4
Meaning of “person responsible” for a storage system
4 Meaning of “person responsible” for a storage system
4 Meaning of “person responsible” for a storage system
In this Regulation, person responsible for a storage system means—
(a) if the storage system has not yet been commissioned—the person who has management and control of the storage system, or
(b) if the storage system is in use—the person who has management and control of the storage system, or
(c) if the storage system is no longer in use but has not been decommissioned—
(i) the person who had management and control of the storage system immediately before the storage system ceased to be used, or
(ii) if that person cannot be located—the person who owns the land on which the storage system is located.
5
Application of Regulation
5 Application of Regulation
5 Application of Regulation
This Regulation applies to all storage systems other than the following—
(a) a storage system whose tanks are situated wholly above ground, together with any associated pipes, valves and other equipment (whether situated above or below ground),
(b) a sump, separator, stormwater or wastewater collection system, catchment basin, pit, septic tank or other like structure (unless petroleum routinely passes through the structure from one part of a storage system to another),
(c) a bunded tank situated below ground level but not in the ground (such as in a basement, cellar or tunnel),
(d) a liquefied petroleum gas storage system.
Part 2
Commissioning of storage systems
Part 2 Commissioning of storage systems
Part 2 Commissioning of storage systems
Division 1
Installation of new storage systems
Division 1 Installation of new storage systems
Division 1 Installation of new storage systems
6
New system not to be commissioned unless properly designed
6 New system not to be commissioned unless properly designed
6 New system not to be commissioned unless properly designed
The person responsible for a storage system must not commission the system, or authorise or permit the commissioning of the system, unless—
(a) the system has been designed by a duly qualified person, and
(b) the person by whom the system has been designed has provided the person responsible for the system with—
(i) a list of the industry standards that have been followed in connection with the design of the system, and
(ii) a copy of the design specifications for the system.
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
7
New system not to be commissioned unless properly installed
7 New system not to be commissioned unless properly installed
7 New system not to be commissioned unless properly installed
The person responsible for a storage system must not commission the system, or authorise or permit the commissioning of the system, unless—
(a) the system has been installed by a duly qualified person, and
(b) the person by whom the system has been installed has provided the person responsible for the system with—
(i) a list of the industry standards that have been followed in connection with the installation of the system, and
(ii) a copy of the installation specifications for the system, and
(iii) current “as-built” drawings for the system.
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
8
New system not to be commissioned unless properly equipped
8 New system not to be commissioned unless properly equipped
8 New system not to be commissioned unless properly equipped
The person responsible for a storage system must not commission the system, or authorise or permit the commissioning of the system, unless—
(a) the system includes the equipment required by AS 4897–2008: The design, installation and operation of underground petroleum storage systems, as in force from time to time, and
(b) a leak detection system is installed on the storage site in accordance with Part 3.
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
9
Equipment integrity test to be performed
9 Equipment integrity test to be performed
9 Equipment integrity test to be performed
The person responsible for a storage system must not commission the system, or authorise or permit the commissioning of the system, unless—
(a) an equipment integrity test of the system has been carried out in accordance with the written directions of a duly qualified person, and
(b) the system has been certified, by the person by whom the test was carried out, as having satisfied the test, and
(c) the person responsible has been provided with the certificate and the results of the equipment integrity test.
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
Division 2
Modification of storage systems
Division 2 Modification of storage systems
Division 2 Modification of storage systems
10
Modified system not to be commissioned unless properly designed
10 Modified system not to be commissioned unless properly designed
10 Modified system not to be commissioned unless properly designed
The person responsible for a modified storage system must not commission the system, or authorise or permit the commissioning of the system, unless—
(a) the modification has been designed by a duly qualified person, and
(b) the person by whom the modification has been designed has provided the person responsible for the system with—
(i) a list of the industry standards that have been followed in connection with the design of the modification, and
(ii) a copy of the design specifications for the modification.
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
11
Modified system not to be commissioned unless properly installed
11 Modified system not to be commissioned unless properly installed
11 Modified system not to be commissioned unless properly installed
The person responsible for a modified storage system must not commission the system, or authorise or permit the commissioning of the system, unless—
(a) the modification has been implemented by a duly qualified person, and
(b) the person by whom the modification has been implemented has provided the person responsible for the system with—
(i) a list of the industry standards that have been followed in connection with the implementation of the modification, and
(ii) a copy of the implementation specifications for the modification, and
(iii) current “as-built” drawings for the system.
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
12
Modified system not to be commissioned unless properly equipped
12 Modified system not to be commissioned unless properly equipped
12 Modified system not to be commissioned unless properly equipped
(1) The person responsible for a modified storage system must not commission the system, or authorise or permit the commissioning of the system, unless—
(a) the system includes the equipment required by AS 4897–2008: The design, installation and operation of underground petroleum storage systems, as in force from time to time, and
(b) a leak detection system is installed on the storage site in accordance with Part 3.
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
(2) Subclause (1)(a) does not require a system commissioned before 1 June 2008 to include the equipment referred to in that paragraph unless the modification is a significant modification.
13
Equipment integrity test to be performed
13 Equipment integrity test to be performed
13 Equipment integrity test to be performed
(1) The person responsible for a modified storage system must not commission the system, or authorise or permit the commissioning of the system, unless—
(a) an equipment integrity test of the system has been carried out in accordance with the written directions of a duly qualified person, and
(b) the system has been certified, by the person by whom the test was carried out, as having satisfied the test, and
(c) the person responsible has been provided with the certificate and the results of the equipment integrity test.
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
(2) The person responsible for a modified storage system must not reuse a tank for the system before the system is recommissioned, or authorise or permit the reuse of a tank before the system is recommissioned, unless—
(a) an equipment integrity test of the tank has been carried out in accordance with the written directions of a duly qualified person, and
(b) the tank has been certified, by the person by whom the test was carried out, as having satisfied the test, and
(c) the person responsible has been provided with the certificate and the results of the equipment integrity test.
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
Division 3
Repair of storage systems
Division 3 Repair of storage systems
Division 3 Repair of storage systems
14
Equipment integrity test to be performed
14 Equipment integrity test to be performed
14 Equipment integrity test to be performed
The person responsible for a storage system that has been repaired following the discovery of a leak in the system must not commission the system, or authorise or permit the commissioning of the system, unless—
(a) an equipment integrity test of the system has been carried out in accordance with the written directions of a duly qualified person, and
(b) the system has been certified, by the person by whom the test was carried out, as having satisfied the test, and
(c) the person responsible has been provided with the certificate and the results of the equipment integrity test.
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
Part 3
Leak detection systems
Part 3 Leak detection systems
Part 3 Leak detection systems
15
Storage system to have leak detection system
15 Storage system to have leak detection system
15 Storage system to have leak detection system
(1) The person responsible for a storage system must not use the storage system, or authorise or permit the use of the storage system, unless a leak detection system has been installed on the storage site in accordance with this clause.
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
(2) In the case of a leak detection system consisting of groundwater monitoring wells, the number and location of the wells to be installed on a storage site is to be determined by a duly qualified person with a view to maximising the likelihood that the wells will intercept contaminated groundwater, whatever the groundwater flow conditions.
(3) In the case of an alternative leak detection system, that system is to be endorsed by a duly qualified person as being an appropriate system for leak detection for the storage site.
16
Leak detection system not to be installed unless properly designed
16 Leak detection system not to be installed unless properly designed
16 Leak detection system not to be installed unless properly designed
The person responsible for a storage system must not install a leak detection system on the storage site, or authorise or permit the installation of a leak detection system on the site, unless—
(a) the leak detection system has been designed by a duly qualified person, and
(b) in the case of a groundwater monitoring well—the person by whom the well has been designed has provided the person responsible for the storage system with a list of the industry standards that have been followed in connection with the design of the well.
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
17
Storage system not to be used unless leak detection system properly installed
17 Storage system not to be used unless leak detection system properly installed
17 Storage system not to be used unless leak detection system properly installed
The person responsible for a storage system located on a storage site on which a leak detection system has been installed must not use the storage system, or authorise or permit the use of the storage system, unless—
(a) the leak detection system has been installed by a duly qualified person, and
(b) in the case of a groundwater monitoring well—
(i) the well has been sealed to exclude surface water, and
(ii) the well is clearly marked to indicate its presence and is properly secured, and
(iii) the person responsible for the storage system has been provided, by the installer of the well, with a list of the industry standards that have been followed in connection with the installation of the well, and
(c) in the case of an alternative leak detection system—
(i) that system has been installed in accordance with EPA guidelines, and
(ii) the person responsible for the storage system has been provided, by the installer of the alternative leak detection system, with the information about that system that is specified by EPA guidelines, and
(d) the person responsible for the storage system has been provided, by the installer of the leak detection system, with the following—
(i) a leak detection system report prepared, in accordance with the EPA guidelines, in relation to the leak detection system,
(ii) a testing procedure prepared in relation to the leak detection system.
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
Part 4
Use of storage systems
Part 4 Use of storage systems
Part 4 Use of storage systems
18
Storage system not to be used unless fuel system operation plan documentation in place
18 Storage system not to be used unless fuel system operation plan documentation in place
18 Storage system not to be used unless fuel system operation plan documentation in place
(1) The person responsible for a storage system must not use the storage system, or authorise or permit the use of the storage system—
(a) unless a fuel system operation plan that complies with this clause is in place in relation to the storage system, and
(b) otherwise than in accordance with that plan.
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
(2) A storage system’s fuel system operation plan must include—
(a) a loss monitoring system for the storage system, and
(b) an incident management procedure that sets out the procedures to be followed in dealing with any leaks and spills of petroleum from the system, and
(c) a maintenance schedule that includes details of what maintenance is proposed to be carried out, and when, in relation to the system generally and in relation to the various gauges, indicators, leak detection systems and other measuring instruments in the system, and
(d) the current “as-built” drawings for the system, and
(e) a plan of the storage site that includes the locations of each of the following—
(i) the storage system,
(ii) all buildings and associated infrastructure,
(iii) all fences and gates,
(iv) all groundwater monitoring wells (including any codes or symbols by which they are designated),
(v) any unsealed ground surfaces,
(vi) all drainage and services, and
(f) a copy of each list of industry standards that have been followed in connection with each of the following—
(i) the design of the system,
(ii) the installation of the system,
(iii) the design of any modification,
(iv) the implementation of any modification, and
(g) a copy of each of the following specifications—
(i) the design specifications for the system,
(ii) the installation specifications for the system,
(iii) the design specifications for any modification,
(iv) the implementation specifications for any modification, and
(h) an inventory of employee site induction and incident management training that has been undertaken on the site, and
(i) the information required by subclause (3).
(3) The information to be included in the fuel system operation plan for a storage system is as follows—
(a) the name of the person responsible for the system and an address for service and a 24 hour contact phone number for that person,
(b) if the person responsible for the relevant storage system is a corporation—
(i) the name of a natural person who is authorised to act on behalf of the corporation in relation to the control of the system, and
(ii) a 24 hour contact phone number for that person,
(c) the street address of the storage site,
(d) the land title particulars (such as the lot and DP numbers) of the land on which the system is situated,
(e) if the person responsible for the system is not the owner of the storage site, the name of the owner,
(f) details of access to, and the security of, the system, including details of any locks, gates, fences and the like and the means of opening them,
(g) the location of all records kept in accordance with Part 5 or 6 (including leak detection system reports).
(4) A loss monitoring system for a storage system (referred to in subclause (2)(a)) must be designed by a duly qualified person in accordance with EPA guidelines to measure discrepancies between—
(a) the amount of petroleum that should be present in the system, and
(b) the amount of petroleum that is actually present in the system,
so as to be capable of detecting losses of petroleum.
(5) The absence, in relation to a storage system, of a list of industry standards or a copy of a specification (referred to in subclause (2)(f) and (g)) does not give rise to an offence if—
(a) the person responsible for the system was not in possession of such a list or copy as at 1 June 2008, and
(b) the person responsible for the system is still not in possession of such a list or copy, and
(c) there is documentary evidence that the person responsible for the system has taken all reasonable steps to obtain such a list or copy.
(6) A storage system’s fuel system operation plan—
(a) must comply with EPA guidelines, and
(b) must be updated as occasion requires, and
(c) must be accessible on the storage site (whether in hard copy or electronic form).
(7) A storage system’s fuel system operation plan may be kept—
(a) as one consolidated document or as a collection of documents, and
(b) in hard copy or electronic form (or as a combination of both).
19
Storage system not to be used unless measuring instruments checked and data recorded
19 Storage system not to be used unless measuring instruments checked and data recorded
19 Storage system not to be used unless measuring instruments checked and data recorded
The person responsible for a storage system must not use the storage system, or authorise or permit the use of the storage system, unless—
(a) all gauges, indicators, leak detection systems and other measuring instruments in the system have been checked and maintained—
(i) in accordance with the manufacturers’ instructions, or
(ii) if there are no such instructions, in accordance with the fuel system operation plan for the system, and
(b) all data produced by the measuring instruments has been recorded.
Maximum penalty—100 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 200 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
20
Leak detection
20 Leak detection
20 Leak detection
(1) The person responsible for a storage system with groundwater monitoring wells must not use the storage system, or authorise or permit the use of the storage system, unless—
(a) the groundwater in each groundwater monitoring well on the storage site has been tested for contamination by petroleum, during the last 6 months, in accordance with the written instructions of a duly qualified person, and
(b) the groundwater in each groundwater monitoring well on the storage site has been sampled and analysed, in accordance with the written instructions of a duly qualified person, no later than 60 days after the occurrence of any of the following—
(i) the installation of a new groundwater monitoring well on the storage site,
(ii) the discovery by the person responsible for the storage system, whether by means of a test referred to in paragraph (a) or otherwise, that groundwater may be contaminated by petroleum originating from the storage site,
(iii) the discovery by the person responsible for the storage system, whether pursuant to the loss monitoring system for the system or otherwise, that the system has a leak.
(2) The person responsible for a storage system with an alternative leak detection system must not use the storage system, or authorise or permit the use of the storage system, unless the storage system has been tested at the times and in the circumstances—
(a) specified in the testing procedure provided by the installer of the alternative leak detection system, or
(b) if the testing procedure does not specify times and circumstances—specified by EPA guidelines.
Note.
Clause 17(d)(ii) provides for the installer of a leak detection system on a storage site to provide the person responsible for a storage system on that site with a testing procedure in relation to the leak detection system.
(3) The person responsible for a storage system must ensure that the following are recorded—
(a) the results of sampling and analysis undertaken for the purposes of subclause (1)(b),
(b) the results of testing undertaken for the purposes of subclause (2).
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
21
Loss detection procedures
21 Loss detection procedures
21 Loss detection procedures
(1) Within 60 days after becoming aware of any discrepancy detected by the loss monitoring system for a storage system, the person responsible for the storage system must ensure that action is taken—
(a) to investigate the discrepancy, and
(b) if the discrepancy cannot be attributed to anything other than a leak, to confirm the existence of a leak, and
(c) if the existence of a leak is confirmed, to identify the source of the leak and to stop the leak.
Note.
See also Part 5.7 of the Act for duties with respect to the notification of pollution incidents.
(2) If a leak is stopped under subclause (1)(c), the person responsible for the storage system must ensure that action is taken as soon as reasonably practicable to prevent the re-occurrence of the leak.
(3) The person responsible for a storage system must ensure that details of action taken under this clause are recorded.
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
Part 5
Records and reports of events
Part 5 Records and reports of events
Part 5 Records and reports of events
Note.
Local authority is defined in the Dictionary to the Act and includes a local council.
22
Record of significant modifications
22 Record of significant modifications
22 Record of significant modifications
If a significant modification is made to a storage system, the person responsible for the storage system must—
(a) ensure that the following information is recorded—
(i) a comprehensive description of the modification,
(ii) the dates of commencement and completion of the modification,
(iii) the results of the equipment integrity test carried out under clause 13, and
(b) ensure that the current “as-built” drawings for the system are revised to reflect the modification.
Maximum penalty—100 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 200 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
23
Notice and report of system being decommissioned
23 Notice and report of system being decommissioned
23 Notice and report of system being decommissioned
(1) If a storage system is to be decommissioned, the person responsible for the storage system must notify the relevant local authority of the decommissioning—
(a) in the case of urgent and unforeseen decommissioning—as soon as reasonably practicable after the decision to decommission the system is made, or
(b) in any other case—no later than 30 days before the system is decommissioned or removed.
Maximum penalty—100 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 200 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
(2) If a storage system is decommissioned, the person responsible for the storage system immediately before the system is decommissioned must ensure that a report for the storage site (prepared in accordance with this clause) is served on the relevant local authority—
(a) no later than 60 days after the system is decommissioned, or
(b) if remediation of the site is required, no later than 60 days after the remediation is completed.
Maximum penalty—100 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 200 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
(3) A report referred to in subclause (2) must—
(a) be prepared by a duly qualified person in accordance with EPA guidelines, and
(b) describe the processes used to decommission the storage system and assess contamination at the storage site.
24
Report to be prepared after tank removed or replaced
24 Report to be prepared after tank removed or replaced
24 Report to be prepared after tank removed or replaced
(1) If a modification of a storage system involves the removal or replacement of any tank, the person responsible for the modified storage system must not commission the system, or authorise or permit the commissioning of the system, unless a report for the storage site (prepared in accordance with this clause) has been served on the relevant local authority—
(a) no later than 60 days after the tank is removed or replaced, or
(b) if remediation of the site is required, no later than 60 days after the remediation is completed.
Maximum penalty—100 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 200 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
(2) A report referred to in subclause (1) must—
(a) be prepared by a duly qualified person in accordance with EPA guidelines, and
(b) describe the processes used to remove or replace the tanks concerned and assess contamination at the storage site, and
(c) describe any remediation work carried out during the removal or replacement of the tanks concerned.
25
Incident log
25 Incident log
25 Incident log
(1) The person responsible for a storage system must ensure that an incident log for the storage system (containing the matter required by this clause) is kept on the storage site or, if another location is specified in the system’s fuel system operation plan, in that location.
Maximum penalty—100 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 200 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
(2) The following activities and incidents must be recorded in the incident log of a storage system—
(a) the carrying out of any activity, by a person acting otherwise than at the direction or request of the person responsible for the system, that has affected, is affecting or could affect the integrity of the system,
(b) the occurrence of any unplanned or abnormal incident (including operational disruptions or equipment failures) that has affected, is affecting or could affect the long-term safety of the system.
(3) A notification under Part 5.7 of the Act of a pollution incident involving a storage system is to be made in a form approved by the appropriate regulatory authority.
Part 6
Keeping of documents
Part 6 Keeping of documents
Part 6 Keeping of documents
26
Documents to be kept for 7 years from date of creation
26 Documents to be kept for 7 years from date of creation
26 Documents to be kept for 7 years from date of creation
(1) The person responsible for a storage system must ensure that each required document for the storage system, including a document delivered in accordance with clause 28, is kept for at least 7 years from the day on which the document was created.
Maximum penalty—100 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 200 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
(2) For the purposes of this clause, required document, in relation to a storage system, means any of the following—
(a) a document containing the results of equipment integrity tests for the system carried out under clause 9, 13 or 14,
(b) a document containing the data produced by any measuring instrument referred to in clause 19,
(c) a document containing details of action taken under clause 21,
(d) a report prepared for the system under clause 23,
(e) a notification that is given to the appropriate regulatory authority of a pollution incident involving a storage system,
Documents to be kept for 7 years from date of decommissioning
27 Documents to be kept for 7 years from date of decommissioning
27 Documents to be kept for 7 years from date of decommissioning
(1) If a storage system is decommissioned, the person responsible for the storage system immediately before the system is decommissioned must ensure that each required document for the storage system, including a document delivered in accordance with clause 28, is kept for at least 7 years from the day on which the system is decommissioned.
Maximum penalty—100 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 200 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
(2) For the purposes of this clause, required document, in relation to a storage system, means any of the following—
(a) each certificate issued for the system under clause 9, 13 or 14,
(b) a leak detection system report referred to in clause 17,
(c) each version of the fuel system operation plan prepared for the system under clause 18,
(d) a record made in relation to the system under clause 22,
(e) a report prepared for the system under clause 23 or 24,
(f) the incident log kept for the system under clause 25,
(g) a report that has been made as a consequence of action taken under Part 5.7 of the Act in connection with a pollution incident involving the system,
(3) The requirements of this clause apply in addition to the requirements of clause 26.
28
Delivery of records on change of responsibility
28 Delivery of records on change of responsibility
28 Delivery of records on change of responsibility
Within 30 days after there is a change in responsibility for a storage system, the person responsible for the system before the change must ensure that all documents for the system that this Part requires to be kept, and that are in the person’s possession, are delivered to the person newly responsible for the system.
Maximum penalty—100 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 200 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
Part 7
Miscellaneous
Part 7 Miscellaneous
Part 7 Miscellaneous
29
Exemptions
29 Exemptions
29 Exemptions
(1) The appropriate regulatory authority may, by order in writing, exempt a person or a class of persons specified in the order from any provision of this Regulation specified in the order to the extent that the provision applies to the person or class in respect of any storage system specified in the order.
(2) The appropriate regulatory authority may grant an exemption on application or of its own motion.
(3) An application for an exemption must be accompanied by the fee (if any) determined by the appropriate regulatory authority.
(4) An order under this clause—
(a) has effect in the circumstances (if any), and subject to the conditions (if any), that are specified in the order, and
(b) may be published in the Gazette or may instead be served on a person specified in the order, and
(c) has effect on and from publication in the Gazette or service of the order or any later date specified in the order, and
(d) is subject to the condition that the exempted person complies with all of the provisions of the Act and the other provisions of this Regulation that apply to the person, and
(e) may be revoked by the appropriate regulatory authority at any time by order in writing published in the Gazette or served on the person referred to in paragraph (b).
30
EPA guidelines
30 EPA guidelines
30 EPA guidelines
(1) The EPA may, by notice published in the Gazette, issue guidelines for the purposes of this Regulation and may, by means of a further notice published in the Gazette, vary or revoke any such guideline.
(2) The following documents are taken, on the commencement of this clause, to be guidelines for the purposes of this Regulation and may be varied or revoked accordingly—
(a) the document entitled Guidelines for Implementing the Protection of the Environment Operations (Underground Petroleum Storage Systems) Regulation 2019, published by the EPA in 2019,
(b) the document entitled Planning and Development Process for Sites with Underground Petroleum Storage Systems, published by the Department of the Environment, Climate Change and Water in 2009,
(c) the document entitled Minimum Construction Requirements for Water Bores in Australia, 3rd edition, published by the National Uniform Drillers Licensing Committee in 2012,
This Regulation is the Protection of the Environment Operations (Underground Petroleum Storage Systems) Regulation 2019.
2 Commencement
2 Commencement
2 Commencement
This Regulation commences on 1 September 2019 and is required to be published on the NSW legislation website.
Note.
This Regulation replaces the Protection of the Environment Operations (Underground Petroleum Storage Systems) Regulation 2014, which is repealed on 1 September 2019 by section 10(2) of the Subordinate Legislation Act 1989.
3 Definitions
3 Definitions
3 Definitions
(1) In this Regulation—
commission, in relation to a storage system or leak detection system, means to bring the system into use for the first time following its installation, modification or repair.
current “as-built” drawings, in relation to a storage system, means drawings that depict the current configuration of the system in relation to the storage site.
decommission, in relation to a storage system, means to remove the system or to render the system permanently unusable.
Note.
Other legislation may require the cessation of the use of certain storage systems.
duly qualified person, in relation to any activity, means a person who has competence and experience in relation to that activity that is—
(a) recognised by a peak body in the relevant industry as appropriate for that activity, or
(b) recognised generally in the relevant industry as appropriate for that activity.
EPA guideline means a guideline in force under clause 30.
fuel system operation plan means documentation for a storage system that contains the procedures and other information required by clause 18.
installation of a storage system means the original installation of the system on the storage site, and includes any work in the vicinity of the storage site necessary for the installation, and anything done to the system before it is commissioned.
Imposes record keeping and reporting duties: records of significant modifications, decommissioning notices and site reports to local authority, reports after tank removal or replacement, incident logs and retention periods of seven years for required documents (Part 5, cl 22-28; Part 6, cl 26-28).
Provides regulatory instruments and discretion: the EPA may issue and vary guidelines (cl 30), and the appropriate regulatory authority may grant exemptions, subject to conditions and fees (cl 29).
Specifies enforcement inputs through maximum penalties expressed in penalty units in operational clauses and a Schedule to the General Regulation (Schedule 1) that substitutes penalty notice offences and sets fixed penalty notice amounts for listed clauses (Schedule 1, items 1-2).
The Regulation therefore converts technical design, installation, testing and operational practices into legal pre‑conditions for commissioning and use, allocates responsibility for compliance to the “person responsible” (cl 4), and centralises certain administrative controls with the EPA and the appropriate regulatory authority (cl 29-31; Schedule 1). The text frequently conditions obligations on work being performed by a “duly qualified person” and on compliance with listed or referenced standards and EPA guidelines (cl 3, cl 6-8, cl 16, cl 18).
Main concepts
The Regulation builds on a small number of recurrent legal and technical concepts. The following are the principal concepts as defined and used in the text.
Person responsible for a storage system. Clause 4 specifies who bears legal responsibility. Where a system is in use or about to be commissioned, the person having management and control of the system is the person responsible. If the system is no longer in use but not decommissioned, responsibility falls on the last manager with control or, if that person cannot be located, the landowner (cl 4).
Duly qualified person. The Regulation repeatedly requires that designs, installations, integrity tests, monitoring system designs and reports be done or endorsed by a “duly qualified person”. Clause 3 defines that term by reference to competence and experience recognised by a relevant industry peak body or generally recognised in the industry. The Regulation delegates technical judgements to these persons rather than prescribing detailed technical steps for every circumstance (cl 3).
Storage system and exclusions. “Storage system” is defined broadly to mean tanks, pipes, valves and other equipment intended to contain or control petroleum, including associated structures through which petroleum routinely passes (cl 3). Excluded are wholly above‑ground tank systems, various ancillary structures unless petroleum routinely passes through them, bunded below‑ground tanks not in the ground, and liquefied petroleum gas systems (cl 5).
Commissioning thresholds. Commissioning a new, modified or repaired system is conditional on specified pre‑conditions: design and installation by a duly qualified person with lists of industry standards and specifications provided, provision of as‑built drawings, inclusion of equipment required by AS 4897-2008 where applicable, installation of a leak detection system, and completion and certification of equipment integrity tests (Part 2, cl 6-14).
Leak detection systems. The Regulation mandates a leak detection system for every storage system in use on the site, either groundwater monitoring wells or an endorsed alternative system. For groundwater wells, the number and siting must maximise the chance of intercepting contaminated groundwater whatever the flow conditions and must be sealed to exclude surface water and clearly marked and secured (cl 15-17).
Fuel system operation plan and loss monitoring. Before use, a fuel system operation plan must be in place and complied with (cl 18). The plan must include a loss monitoring system designed in accordance with EPA guidelines to detect discrepancies between expected and actual petroleum volumes, incident management procedures, maintenance schedule, as‑built drawings, site plan, copies of standards and specifications, staff induction and training records and contact information (cl 18(2)-(3)).
Testing, sampling and timelines. Periodic testing and recording obligations are set out. Groundwater wells must be tested within six months for contamination, and sampling and analysis must occur within 60 days after new well installation, discovery of possible contamination, or discovery of a leak. For alternative systems, testing must follow the installer’s procedure or EPA guidelines if the procedure is silent (cl 20). Discrepancies detected by the loss monitoring system trigger a 60‑day window for investigation and confirmation, and immediate action to stop leaks when confirmed (cl 21).
Records and reporting. Significant modifications, decommissioning and tank removal or replacement attract recording and reporting duties prepared by a duly qualified person in accordance with EPA guidelines, to be served on the relevant local authority within specified timeframes (cl 22-24). Incident logs and retention of required documents for seven years are mandatory (cl 25-27). On change of responsibility, documents in the former person’s possession must be delivered within 30 days (cl 28).
Regulatory instruments and discretion. The EPA may publish guidelines and declare existing documents to be EPA guidelines on commencement (cl 30). The appropriate regulatory authority can grant exemptions in writing, impose conditions and fees and revoke exemptions (cl 29). Schedule 1 amends the General Regulation to restate that the EPA remains the appropriate regulatory authority for certain existing notices until compliance (Schedule 1, cl 1) and substitutes a Schedule 6 table listing penalty notice offences and fixed penalty amounts (Schedule 1, cl 2).
Standards referenced. The Regulation references AS 4897-2008 for equipment required in systems (cl 8, cl 12(1)(a)), and requires conformity with industry standards as recorded by the designer or installer (cl 6-7, cl 10-11).
These concepts form a structure in which technical choices are made by industry‑recognised professionals, documentation and testing create a traceable compliance trail, and the EPA/appropriate regulatory authority retains administrative power through guidelines and exemption powers.
Who it affects
Primary legal obligation holders. The person responsible for a storage system is the legal actor on whom the Regulation imposes duty across design, commissioning, operation, monitoring, reporting and record keeping (cl 4, cl 6-21, cl 22-28). This definition captures the manager with control when the system is in use or being commissioned, and in certain circumstances the landowner where the last manager cannot be found (cl 4(c)). The effect is to place a broad set of obligations on whoever manages or controls a storage system; ownership alone is not the sole trigger.
Operators and service providers. The Regulation creates compliance roles for designers, installers and testers who must be “duly qualified”. These persons must provide the person responsible with lists of industry standards, specifications, as‑built drawings and certificates of integrity testing (cl 6-9, cl 10-14, cl 16-17). The text makes those professionals the source of technical certification and of information that the person responsible must keep.
Local authorities. Local authorities are recipients of statutory notices and reports. Decommissioning must be notified to the relevant local authority and decommissioning reports, and reports after tank removal or replacement, must be served on that authority within stated timeframes (cl 23-24). The Regulation therefore places informational duties that flow to local government bodies.
EPA and the appropriate regulatory authority. The EPA has rolemaking and administrative powers under the Regulation. It can issue EPA guidelines by notice in the Gazette (cl 30) and certain documents are taken as EPA guidelines on commencement (cl 30(2)). The appropriate regulatory authority may grant exemptions, impose conditions, charge fees in connection with exemption applications and revoke exemptions (cl 29). Under Schedule 1 (amending the General Regulation), the EPA remains the appropriate regulatory authority for certain existing notices until final compliance (Schedule 1, cl 1).
Persons acquiring responsibility. On any change in responsibility for a storage system, the outgoing person must deliver all documents required to be kept under Parts 5 and 6 to the incoming person within 30 days (cl 28). This provision affects transferees, purchasers or managers taking over control of a system and creates a duty on prior responsible parties to provide a historical compliance record.
Industry peak bodies and testers. The definition of “duly qualified person” imports recognition by a peak body “in the relevant industry” or general recognition in the industry (cl 3). That approach makes industry associations and recognitions relevant gatekeepers for who can provide designs, certifications and endorsements under the Regulation.
Third parties and contractors. The Regulation also encompasses third party activities that affect system integrity. The incident log must record activities by persons acting otherwise than at the direction or request of the person responsible that may affect system integrity (cl 25(2)(a)). This captures contractors, service personnel, or third parties whose actions may incidentally affect the system.
Who is not affected. The Regulation expressly excludes storage systems whose tanks are wholly above ground and certain ancillary structures, bunded tanks situated below ground level but not in the ground, and liquefied petroleum gas storage systems (cl 5). Those classes of systems are outside the Regulation’s scope.
In practice, the effect is to spread regulatory obligations across the management chain: managers (or owners if managers cannot be located) bear the core duties, while duly qualified designers, installers and testers supply the technical inputs and certification on which compliance depends. Local authorities and the EPA receive documentary outputs and retain administrative discretion through exemptions and guidelines.
Key duties and rights
Duties to obtain and rely on qualified technical input. The person responsible must ensure designs, installations, modifications and well designs are prepared and certified by a duly qualified person, and must obtain lists of industry standards and specifications and as‑built drawings from those persons before commissioning (cl 6-7, cl 10-11, cl 16). Where integrity tests are required, they must be carried out in accordance with written directions of a duly qualified person and certified as having been satisfied; the certificate and test results must be provided to the person responsible (cl 9, cl 13, cl 14).
Commissioning and equipment requirements. The Regulation makes commissioning contingent on several pre‑conditions: design and installation certification, equipment required by AS 4897-2008 where applicable (cl 8, cl 12(1)(a)), installation of a leak detection system in accordance with Part 3 (cl 8, cl 12(1)(b)) and successful equipment integrity testing (cl 9, cl 13, cl 14).
Operational duties. Before and during use, the person responsible must have in place and comply with a fuel system operation plan (cl 18(1)). The plan must include a loss monitoring system, incident management procedure, maintenance schedule, current as‑built drawings, site plan with specific items identified, copies of industry standards and specifications, and staff induction and training inventory (cl 18(2)-(3)). All gauges, indicators and measuring instruments must be checked and maintained as per manufacturers’ instructions or the fuel system operation plan, and all data from these instruments must be recorded (cl 19).
Leak detection and response duties. The person responsible must ensure a leak detection system is installed and maintained on site before use is permitted (cl 15). Groundwater monitoring wells must be sited to maximise interception of contaminated groundwater (cl 15(2)). Wells must be sealed to exclude surface water, marked and secured; testing of groundwater must occur within six months and within 60 days after certain trigger events (cl 17, cl 20). For alternative leak detection systems, the system must be endorsed by a duly qualified person and installed and tested in accordance with the installer’s testing procedure or EPA guidelines (cl 15(3), cl 17(c), cl 20(2)).
Investigation timeframes. If a discrepancy is detected by the loss monitoring system, the person responsible must, within 60 days, investigate, confirm a leak if it cannot be attributed to other causes, and if a leak is confirmed, identify and stop it; if stopped, action must be taken as soon as reasonably practicable to prevent recurrence (cl 21(1)-(2)). Details of the action taken must be recorded (cl 21(3)).
Reporting and record‑keeping. The Regulation requires records of significant modifications with equipment integrity test results and revised as‑built drawings (cl 22). Decommissioning requires notice to the relevant local authority and a report prepared by a duly qualified person in accordance with EPA guidelines (cl 23). If a tank is removed or replaced as part of modification, a report must be served on the local authority (cl 24). An incident log must be kept on site (cl 25). Required documents must be kept for at least seven years from their creation or from decommissioning (cl 26-27). On change of responsibility, documents in the outgoing person’s possession must be delivered within 30 days to the incoming person (cl 28).
Regulatory powers and rights. The EPA can issue and vary guidelines by notice in the Gazette (cl 30). The appropriate regulatory authority may issue written exemptions, with conditions and fees, and may publish or serve such orders and revoke them (cl 29). The Schedule to the General Regulation provides for penalty notices for many of the Regulation’s clauses and sets fixed penalty notice amounts (Schedule 1, cl 2).
Compliance defences and exceptions. Clause 18(5) provides a limited exception where a document (eg list of industry standards or copy of a specification) is absent if the person responsible did not possess it as at 1 June 2008, remains without it, and has documentary evidence of having taken all reasonable steps to obtain it. Clause 12(2) disapplies the AS 4897 equipment requirement for systems commissioned before 1 June 2008 unless the modification is significant (cl 12(2)). These are narrow exceptions tied to historical possession or pre‑2008 systems.
Penalties and administrative remedies. Many operational duties carry maximum penalties expressed in penalty units specified in each clause (eg maximum 200 penalty units for cl 6-8, 10-14, 15 etc; cl 19 is 100 penalty units; see multiple clauses). Schedule 1 replaces the penalty notice offences table to specify fixed penalty notice amounts for breach of listed clauses (Schedule 1, cl 2). The practical enforcement tools therefore include prosecution up to the maximum penalty units and issuing penalty notices at fixed amounts.
Summary. The core duties are procedural and documentary: obtain and rely on duly qualified persons for design, installation and testing, keep and provide specified documents, operate loss monitoring and leak detection systems, carry out specified testing and investigation within set timeframes, maintain an incident log and keep records for seven years. Rights granted in the text are limited: the EPA and the appropriate regulatory authority have guideline and exemption powers; the person responsible has the right to seek exemptions and the right to rely on duly qualified persons and their certifications, subject to the narrow exceptions specified.
Penalties and enforcement
Penalty structure in the Regulation is twofold: statutory maximum penalties expressed in penalty units in the operational clauses, and fixed penalty notice amounts set by amendment to the General Regulation (Schedule 1). Enforcement mechanisms include criminal prosecution for breaches up to the statutory maxima and the issuing of penalty notices for listed offences.
Maximum penalties. Many clauses specify maximum penalties, often differentiated by individual and corporation. For example, clauses requiring that a person not commission unless the system was designed or installed by a duly qualified person (cl 6-7) carry a maximum penalty of 200 penalty units for an individual and 400 penalty units for a corporation. Other clauses carry lower maxima, for instance cl 19 (maintenance and recording of measuring instruments) carries a maximum penalty of 100 penalty units for an individual and 200 penalty units for a corporation. These maxima are set within each clause where the duty is prescribed (see cl 6-14, cl 15(1), cl 18(1), cl 19, cl 20, cl 21, cl 22-25, cl 26-28).
Penalty notices. Schedule 1 amends the General Regulation to insert a table of penalty notice offences and fixed penalty amounts for breach of specified clauses of this Regulation (Schedule 1, cl 2). The table lists many of the core clauses (cl 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12(1), 13(1) and (2), 14, 15(1), 16, 17, 18(1), cl 20, cl 21) and assigns fixed penalties for officers 1 and 2 at amounts such as $500 or $1,000 for those clauses, and lower fixed amounts ($250 or $500) for some record‑keeping offences (Schedule 1, cl 2 table). The table replaces the matter relating to the repealed 2014 Regulation (Schedule 1, cl 2). The inclusion of offences in the Schedule means an authorised officer can issue an on‑the‑spot penalty notice for contraventions specified in the Schedule, at the fixed amounts listed.
Who enforces and discretion. The appropriate regulatory authority has a role in exemptions (cl 29) and is referred to in the Act as the decision‑making body. Schedule 1 (amending cl 91 of the General Regulation) declares the EPA to be the appropriate regulatory authority for existing notices and directions under the old regime until compliance is achieved (Schedule 1, cl 1). The EPA may issue EPA guidelines by Gazette notice, and may vary or revoke them (cl 30). These powers give administrative discretion in setting technical guidance and in handling exemption applications. The Regulation permits the appropriate regulatory authority to attach conditions to exemptions and to revoke them by order in writing published in the Gazette or served on the person (cl 29(4)).
Enforcement inputs referenced elsewhere. The Regulation refers to notification duties under Part 5.7 of the Act for pollution incidents (see cl 21 note and other notes), which implies further enforcement consequences under the Act for pollution incidents. The Regulation also requires that certain reports be prepared by a duly qualified person in accordance with EPA guidelines, and served on the relevant local authority (cl 23-24); failure to comply with those duties is subject to the penalties listed in the clauses and to fixed penalty notices where listed in the Schedule.
Procedural mechanics on issuing notices and fees. Clause 29(3) states that an application for an exemption must be accompanied by the fee (if any) determined by the appropriate regulatory authority; the Regulation leaves fee determination to the regulatory authority. Clause 29(4)(b) contemplates that an order granting exemption may be published in the Gazette or served on a specified person, and clause 29(4)(c) sets the date on which the order takes effect. The Regulation therefore contemplates procedural publication and service requirements for exemptions.
Enforcement reach and limits. The Regulation frequently ties obligations to evidence supplied by a duly qualified person (for example lists of standards, test certificates and as‑built drawings) and to EPA guidelines (cl 18(6), cl 17(c)). Compliance is provable via documentation required to be retained for seven years (cl 26-27). Clause 18(5) establishes a narrow defence for the absence of certain historical documents if the person responsible lacked possession as at 1 June 2008, remains without them, and has documentary evidence of having taken all reasonable steps to obtain them. This is an evidentiary limitation the Regulation recognises.
Summary. Enforcement operates through criminal penalties up to the statutory maxima in the clauses, and through fixed penalty notices for listed offences as set out in Schedule 1 to the General Regulation, with the EPA and the appropriate regulatory authority holding guideline and exemption powers that affect how enforcement may be applied. The Regulation ties many obligations to documentary evidence from duly qualified persons and to records retained for seven years, embedding documentation as both compliance measure and enforcement tool.
How it interacts with other laws
The Regulation does not operate in isolation. It expressly links to the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997, the Interpretation Act 1987, and the General Regulation, and it references external standards and guidelines. These cross‑references determine jurisdictional points, notification duties under the Act, and where discretion is located.
Interaction with the Act. The Regulation defines its terms by reference to the Act and notes that definitions such as “appropriate regulatory authority” are in section 6 of the Act (cl 3 note). The Regulation’s duties on pollution incidents point readers to Part 5.7 of the Act for notification duties (cl 21 note). Schedule 1 explicitly invokes section 6(3) of the Act, declaring the EPA to be the appropriate regulatory authority for certain existing notices and directions until those requirements are complied with (Schedule 1, cl 1). The Regulation therefore defers to the Act for institutional definitions, for notification rules on pollution incidents and for authority to declare an agency as the appropriate regulatory authority in specific circumstances.
Amendment and substitution of the General Regulation. Schedule 1 expressly amends the Protection of the Environment Operations (General) Regulation 2009 by substituting clause 91 and by replacing Schedule 6 penalty notice offences to remove references to the repealed 2014 Regulation and insert the table for the 2019 Regulation (Schedule 1, items 1-2). That amendment shifts which authority is appropriate in relation to existing notices, and sets the fixed penalty notice framework. The Regulation thus interacts procedurally with the General Regulation for enforcement and authority matters.
References to external technical standards and documents. Clause 8 and clause 12(1)(a) require that systems include equipment required by AS 4897-2008: The design, installation and operation of underground petroleum storage systems, as in force from time to time. Clause 18 requires fuel system operation plans and loss monitoring systems to be designed in accordance with EPA guidelines. Clause 30 further provides for the EPA to issue guidelines and lists specific documents that are taken to be EPA guidelines on commencement, including the EPA’s own 2019 Guidelines for Implementing this Regulation, a 2009 Departmental planning document, and a 2012 Minimum Construction Requirements for Water Bores in Australia. Those references bind technical compliance to external standards and to EPA guidelines, and make those documents part of the regulatory architecture.
Local authority duties. The Regulation requires service of decommissioning reports and tank replacement/removal reports on the relevant local authority (cl 23-24). Those duties create an administrative interface between operators and local government, and the local authority becomes a recipient of compliance information that may interact with local planning or remediation regimes.
Exemption and guideline mechanisms. Clause 29 grants the appropriate regulatory authority broad power to exempt persons or classes of persons from specified provisions of the Regulation, including by setting conditions and charging fees. Clause 30 grants the EPA the power to issue and vary guidelines by Gazette notice and to take certain pre‑existing documents as EPA guidelines on commencement. These provisions create a legal mechanism that links primary statutory obligations to secondary administrative instruments that can be varied without amendment to the Regulation itself.
Savings and transitional provisions. Clause 31 provides that any act, matter or thing that had effect under the 2014 Regulation immediately before its repeal is taken to have effect under the 2019 Regulation. Schedule 1 also addresses existing notices by declaring the EPA to be appropriate regulatory authority for them until compliance (Schedule 1, cl 1). These are transitional devices that bridge the earlier regulatory regime and the current one.
Interaction with recordkeeping and disclosure laws. The Regulation imposes document delivery obligations on change of responsibility (cl 28) and retention obligations for seven years (cl 26-27). Those duties may interact operationally with privacy, corporate records and conveyancing practices, although the Regulation itself does not carve out privacy exceptions for required reporting; it simply requires records to be kept and transferred as specified.
Summary. The Regulation relies on the Act for institutional definitions and notification duties, amends the General Regulation for penalty notice and appropriate regulatory authority settings, binds technical compliance to external standards (AS 4897-2008) and EPA guidelines, and creates an administrative interface with local authorities through reporting duties. It also provides mechanisms for exemptions and guideline issuance that allow secondary instruments to shape compliance detail without statutory amendment.
Amendment history
The Regulation commenced on 1 September 2019 and replaces the Protection of the Environment Operations (Underground Petroleum Storage Systems) Regulation 2014, which was repealed on that date under section 10(2) of the Subordinate Legislation Act 1989 (cl 2). Clause 31 records a savings provision that preserves the effect of acts, matters or things that had effect under the 2014 Regulation immediately before repeal, taking them to have effect under the 2019 Regulation (cl 31).
Schedule 1 to the Regulation amends the Protection of the Environment Operations (General) Regulation 2009 in two material ways:
It omits and substitutes clause 91 to declare the EPA to be the appropriate regulatory authority for any matter arising under any relevant existing notice, direction or requirement relating to the 2019 Regulation until that notice or direction has been complied with or the requirement satisfied. The new clause 91 defines “relevant existing notice, direction or requirement” so as to capture notices that were made under the former clause prior to substitution and remain in force (Schedule 1, item 1).
It substitutes Schedule 6 (Penalty notice offences) to replace the matter that related to the 2014 Regulation with a new table listing offences under the 2019 Regulation and fixed penalty notice amounts for “Officer 1” and “Officer 2”. The table sets penalty notice amounts ranging from $250 to $1,000 for specified clauses (Schedule 1, item 2).
The Regulation also takes several documents to be EPA guidelines on commencement (cl 30(2)). Those documents include: the EPA’s 2019 "Guidelines for Implementing the Protection of the Environment Operations (Underground Petroleum Storage Systems) Regulation 2019"; the Departmental 2009 planning and development process document for sites with underground petroleum storage systems; the 2012 "Minimum Construction Requirements for Water Bores in Australia"; and any other guidelines in effect immediately before repeal of the 2014 Regulation (cl 30(2)(a)-(d)). The Regulation therefore folded prior guidance into the new guideline regime on commencement.
Transitional and historic provisions. The Regulation contains two specific transitional treatments:
Clause 18(5) provides a limited transitional evidentiary rule for historical documents, making the absence of lists of industry standards or copies of specifications non‑offending where the person responsible did not possess them as at 1 June 2008, remains without them, and can show documentary evidence of having taken all reasonable steps to obtain them. This provision recognises historical gaps in records.
Clause 12(2) disapplies the AS 4897 equipment requirement for systems commissioned before 1 June 2008, unless the modification is significant. That is an explicit temporal carve‑out for legacy systems with limited retroactivity.
No other amendments or repeals are contained in the provided text. The Regulation does, however, empower the EPA to vary or revoke EPA guidelines by Gazette notice (cl 30(1)), which creates a mechanism to update technical guidance without legislative amendment.
Records of earlier practice. Clause 31 ensures continuity of prior acts, matters or things that had effect under the repealed 2014 Regulation, by taking them to have effect under the 2019 Regulation. The Schedule’s treatment of existing notices in clause 91 likewise ensures administrative continuity in the transition of regulatory responsibility.
Summary. The Regulation replaced the 2014 instrument on 1 September 2019, carried forward several guideline documents as EPA guidelines at commencement, preserved earlier acts under a savings clause, provided narrow transitional exceptions for pre‑2008 records and equipment, and amended the General Regulation to set enforcement and transitional arrangements, including fixed penalty notices and declaration of appropriate regulatory authority for existing matters.
Litigation history
The text of the Regulation as provided contains no judicial decisions, case names or references to litigation interpreting or applying its provisions. The document does include notes that the Act and the Interpretation Act 1987 contain definitions and provisions affecting interpretation and application (cl 3 note), and it directs readers to Part 5.7 of the Act for duties relating to notification of pollution incidents (cl 21 note). Schedule 1 references the ongoing effect of existing notices and directions and declares the EPA to be the appropriate regulatory authority for those matters until compliance (Schedule 1, cl 1).
Because the Regulation reproduces statutory duties, the practical litigation risks on many points will turn on: the definition and status of a “duly qualified person” (cl 3), the sufficiency of documentation supplied by designers and installers, the sufficiency of records kept for seven years (cl 26-27), and the correctness of technical tests and reports required to be prepared “in accordance with EPA guidelines” (cl 23-24, cl 30). The text itself does not supply cases or judicial interpretation of how courts or tribunals have applied the definition of “duly qualified person” or other contested provisions.
Any litigation arising under the Regulation would therefore be governed by the Act’s enforcement provisions and by general administrative and evidentiary principles, with factual disputes likely to concern whether a person met the “duly qualified” standard, whether required documentation was supplied and retained, whether testing and monitoring complied with an applicable testing procedure or EPA guidelines, and whether notification and reporting timeframes were observed. The Regulation does, however, include a narrow evidentiary concession for documents not possessed as at 1 June 2008 (cl 18(5)), which could be relied upon in a contested prosecution where a defendant demonstrates reasonable steps were taken to obtain historical documents.
In short, the Regulation contains no litigation history or precedent in the text provided. Practitioners will need to refer to decisions under the Act and subsequent judicial or tribunal decisions to identify how courts have interpreted “duly qualified person”, the scope of EPA guidelines and the evidentiary weight of the documents and certificates the Regulation makes central to compliance.
Gotchas
The text contains several provisions that can catch regulated parties if not carefully observed. These are factual, procedural and documentary pitfalls grounded in the Regulation’s wording.
Person responsible allocation. Where a system is no longer in use but not decommissioned, responsibility may fall on the person who had management and control immediately before the system ceased to be used, or, if that person cannot be located, on the landowner (cl 4(c)(i)-(ii)). That rule can transfer legal obligations to landowners who did not manage the system, if prior managers cannot be found. Purchasers and prospective owners should therefore verify the historical chain of responsibility and secure documents and indemnities in any transaction.
Reliance on “duly qualified person” and its practical uncertainty. Many duties are satisfied only if design, installation, testing and endorsement come from a “duly qualified person” (cl 3, cl 6-7, cl 9, cl 13-14, cl 16, cl 17). Clause 3 defines that term by reference to recognition by a peak body or general industry recognition. The Regulation does not provide a list of acceptable peak bodies or an accreditation register. The absence of a clear, statutory accreditation list creates a potential evidentiary issue about who qualifies as “duly qualified” and may require proof of recognition in each case, which can be contested in enforcement proceedings.
Document and information delivery obligations with short timeframes. The person responsible must obtain lists of industry standards, specifications and current as‑built drawings before commissioning (cl 6-7). On change of responsibility, documents that this Part requires to be kept and that are in the outgoing person’s possession must be delivered within 30 days (cl 28). Failure to assemble and transfer these materials promptly may result in fixed penalty notices for contravention as listed in Schedule 1. Practices that rely on electronic systems or third‑party custody of documents must ensure compliance with these transfer deadlines.
Record retention and evidentiary consequences. Required documents must be kept for at least seven years from creation, and for decommissioned systems seven years from decommissioning (cl 26-27). The Regulation makes the documentary trail central to proving compliance. Loss of records, inadequate indexing of where records are kept (cl 18(3)(g) requires location of records be included in the fuel system operation plan) or failure to transfer records on change of responsibility (cl 28) are practical compliance risks.
Fuel system operation plan must be on site. The plan must comply with EPA guidelines, be updated as required and be accessible on the storage site, whether in hard copy or electronically (cl 18(6)). Storing the plan offsite with no usable access at the site may constitute non‑compliance. The Regulation allows electronic storage, but the person responsible must ensure accessibility on the site in practice.
Testing and sampling timeframes. Groundwater monitoring wells must be tested within six months and sampled and analysed within 60 days after certain trigger events (cl 20(1)). Loss monitoring discrepancies must be investigated within 60 days (cl 21(1)). These are relatively short clock periods after discovery or events. The person responsible must have tested protocols, access to laboratories and testing contractors, and procedures for immediate action to avoid breach of the 60‑day windows.
Alternative leak detection system endorsement and testing. An alternative leak detection system must be endorsed by a duly qualified person as appropriate for the site (cl 15(3)). It must also be installed in accordance with EPA guidelines and accompanied by information specified by EPA guidelines (cl 17(c)). The installer must provide a testing procedure and the person responsible must ensure testing occurs as specified or as per EPA guidelines if the procedure is silent (cl 17(d), cl 20(2)). Failure to obtain or follow the endorsed testing procedure can render the alternative system non‑compliant.
AS 4897-2008 and legacy systems. The Regulation requires equipment specified in AS 4897-2008 for new and modified systems (cl 8, cl 12(1)(a)), but carves out systems commissioned before 1 June 2008 unless the modification is significant (cl 12(2)). That creates a potential “legacy” differentiation: upgrades short of significant modification may avoid immediate retrofitting to AS 4897. Determining whether a modification is “significant” (defined in cl 3) , replacement of the whole system or half or more of tanks , is therefore material and can be contested.
Exemptions are discretionary and revocable. The appropriate regulatory authority may exempt persons or classes from specified provisions, but exemptions are subject to conditions, may require fees and may be revoked at any time by order in writing published in the Gazette or served on the person (cl 29(1)-(4)(d)-(e)). Reliance on an exemption should therefore consider the possibility of revocation and any conditions attached.
Penalty notice amounts are lower than statutory maxima. The Schedule sets relatively modest fixed penalty amounts for many contraventions (Schedule 1, cl 2 table). While a fixed penalty notice provides an immediate enforcement tool, the availability of penalty notices does not preclude prosecution up to statutory maxima, and repeated or serious non‑compliance may attract higher consequences.
Local authority reporting deadlines. Decommissioning must be notified to the relevant local authority as soon as reasonably practicable for urgent decommissioning or no later than 30 days in other cases, and reports must be served within 60 days after decommissioning or remediation completion (cl 23). Practitioners should note the two distinct timing obligations for notice and for the substantive report, and the requirement that the report be prepared by a duly qualified person in accordance with EPA guidelines.
Documentary preparation standards. Reports and decommissioning documents must be prepared by a duly qualified person in accordance with EPA guidelines (cl 23(3), cl 24(2)). This couples the legal sufficiency of reports to compliance with potentially updateable administrative guidelines.
Summary. The key “gotchas” are documentary and procedural: prove you have a duly qualified person, maintain and make accessible a fuel system operation plan and records on site, perform tests and investigations within the 60‑day and six‑month windows, ensure transfer of records on change of responsibility within 30 days, and be prepared for discretionary exemptions and guideline updates from the EPA. The statutory definition of “person responsible” can assign obligations to non‑operating landowners if prior managers cannot be located.
How to comply
Compliance under the Regulation is documentary, procedural and technical. The following steps track the Regulation’s sequence of obligations and cite the clauses that require each action. Practitioners should treat this as an implementation checklist grounded in the statutory text.
Identify the person responsible (cl 4)
Confirm who has management and control of each storage system. If the system is out of use but not decommissioned, ensure there is clarity on whether the previous manager can be located; otherwise the landowner may be the person responsible (cl 4(c)).
Record name, address for service and a 24 hour contact number for the person responsible, and for corporate responsible parties, identify a natural person authorised to act with a 24 hour contact number (cl 18(3)(a)-(b)).
Engage duly qualified persons and document their recognition (cl 3, cl 6-7, cl 16)
For design, installation, modification work and leak detection system design, engage persons who meet the “duly qualified person” definition. Obtain written evidence of recognition by an industry peak body or equivalent industry recognition, as the Regulation ties compliance to the act of a duly qualified person (cl 3, cl 6, cl 16).
Require designers and installers to provide lists of industry standards followed and copies of design and installation specifications, and obtain current as‑built drawings before commissioning (cl 6-7, cl 11).
Do not commission new, modified, or repaired systems without: (a) design and installation by a duly qualified person, with lists of standards and specifications provided (cl 6-7, cl 10-11); (b) the system including equipment required by AS 4897-2008 where applicable (cl 8, cl 12(1)(a)); (c) a leak detection system installed in accordance with Part 3 (cl 8, cl 12(1)(b)); and (d) completion and certification of an equipment integrity test carried out in accordance with the written directions of a duly qualified person, with certificates and results provided to the person responsible (cl 9, cl 13, cl 14).
If modifying a tank for reuse, ensure integrity testing of the tank per cl 13(2) before reuse.
Install and document leak detection systems (Part 3; cl 15-17)
Install groundwater monitoring wells or obtain an endorsed alternative leak detection system before use (cl 15(1), cl 15(3)).
For wells, have a duly qualified person determine number and location (cl 15(2)) and ensure sealing to exclude surface water, marking, securing and provision of installation standards and a leak detection system report and testing procedure by the installer (cl 17(b), cl 17(d)).
For alternative systems, obtain endorsement by a duly qualified person, ensure installation follows EPA guidelines and capture the testing procedure and required information specified by EPA guidelines (cl 15(3), cl 17(c)-(d), cl 20(2)).
Prepare and maintain a fuel system operation plan and loss monitoring (cl 18)
Prepare a fuel system operation plan that complies with EPA guidelines, contains a loss monitoring system designed by a duly qualified person in accordance with EPA guidelines, incident management procedures, maintenance schedule, current as‑built drawings, a site plan with required items marked, lists of standards and specifications, staff training and induction inventory, contact details and locations of records (cl 18(1)-(3), cl 18(4)).
Keep the plan accessible on the storage site in hard copy or electronically and update as necessary (cl 18(6)).
Implement routine checks and data recording (cl 19)
Check and maintain all gauges, indicators, leak detection systems and other measuring instruments either per manufacturers’ instructions or per the fuel system operation plan; record all data produced by the instruments (cl 19).
Establish testing, sampling and incident response protocols (cl 20-21)
Ensure groundwater wells are tested within six months for petroleum contamination, and sampled and analysed within 60 days after specified trigger events (cl 20(1)-(1)(b)).
For alternative systems, follow the installer’s testing procedure or EPA guidelines for testing times and circumstances (cl 20(2)).
If the loss monitoring system shows a discrepancy, investigate and, within 60 days, investigate, confirm and stop any leak, and record actions taken (cl 21(1)-(3)). Ensure incident management procedures in the fuel system operation plan are followed (cl 18(2)(b)).
Record reporting and notification to local authority (cl 22-24)
Keep records for significant modifications and revise as‑built drawings to reflect the modification; record integrity test results and dates (cl 22).
If the system is to be decommissioned, notify the relevant local authority as soon as reasonably practicable for urgent decommissioning or no later than 30 days before decommissioning; within 60 days after decommissioning (or remediation completion, where required) serve a decommissioning report prepared by a duly qualified person in accordance with EPA guidelines (cl 23(1)-(3)).
If a tank is removed or replaced as part of modification, serve a report on the relevant local authority no later than 60 days after the tank is removed or replaced or after remediation is completed (cl 24).
Maintain and make available incident logs and records (cl 25-28)
Keep an incident log on site (or other location specified in the fuel system operation plan) that records activities by persons acting without direction that affect system integrity and unplanned incidents affecting long‑term safety (cl 25).
Retain required documents for at least seven years from creation, and for decommissioned systems retain required documents for at least seven years from decommissioning (cl 26-27).
On change of responsibility, deliver all documents in the outgoing person’s possession that the Regulation requires to be kept to the incoming person within 30 days (cl 28).
Monitor exemptions, guidelines and standards (cl 29-30)
If a regulatory relief is needed, apply to the appropriate regulatory authority for an exemption in writing and be prepared to pay any fee determined by the authority; consider that exemptions may be conditional and revocable (cl 29(1)-(4)).
Keep an eye on EPA guidelines published in the Gazette and any variations thereof, and treat the specific documents listed in cl 30(2) as EPA guidelines unless varied (cl 30).
Build an evidence trail and internal controls
Ensure contracts with designers, installers and testers require delivery of lists of industry standards, specifications, as‑built drawings and integrity test certificates.
Maintain a centralised index of where records are kept, and ensure the fuel system operation plan lists that location (cl 18(3)(g)).
Build internal procedures to ensure testing, sampling and investigations are triggered automatically by monitoring alarms and that the 60‑day and six‑month timeframes are calendared.
Respond to enforcement risk
Be aware of the Schedule’s fixed penalty amounts for many contraventions and the statutory maximum penalties in each clause; maintain records that will demonstrate compliance if an authorised officer asks for supporting documents (Schedule 1, cl 2; cl 6-21, cl 22-28).
Where historical documents are missing and pre‑2008 provenance is relevant, assemble documentary evidence of “all reasonable steps” taken to obtain such lists or specifications to rely on clause 18(5) if needed.
This compliance roadmap follows the Regulation’s sequence and language. It converts statutory obligations into a set of procurement, documentation, monitoring and reporting actions. The central legal control points are the engagement and documentation provided by duly qualified persons, the fuel system operation plan and its operationalisation on site, and the creation and retention of the documentary trail for audits, transfers of responsibility and enforcement.
Meaning of “person responsible” for a storage system
leak, in relation to a storage system, means any loss of petroleum from the system because it is not providing full and continuous containment of petroleum.
leak detection system means a system designed to detect contamination by, or failure of, a storage system in the event of a failure in loss monitoring systems that consists of either—
(a) groundwater monitoring wells, or
(b) an alternative leak detection system.
loss monitoring system for a storage system means the system referred to in clause 18(2)(a) as included in the fuel system operation plan for the system.
modification of a storage system includes any upgrade, extension, alteration or replacement of the system, or any component of the system, but does not include—
(a) anything done to the system before it is first commissioned, or
(b) anything done to the system after it is decommissioned, or
(c) anything done to the system as part of routine maintenance (including any repairs to the system that are done in the course of regular scheduled upkeep of the system), or
(d) anything done to the system before 1 June 2008, or
(e) anything done to a storage site, or any building on a storage site, that does not directly affect the system.
modified storage system means a storage system that has been modified.
person responsible for a storage system—see clause 4.
petroleum means any fuel that consists predominantly of a mixture of hydrocarbons, whether or not the fuel includes additives (such as ethanol), and includes used oil.
Note.
Clause 5 provides that this Regulation does not apply to a liquefied petroleum gas storage system.
significant modification of a storage system means any modification to the system that results in—
(a) the replacement of the whole of the system, or
(b) the replacement of a half or more of the tanks in the system.
storage site of a storage system means the premises (or the part of the premises) in or on which the system is situated.
storage system means a system of tanks, pipes, valves and other equipment that is designed—
(a) to contain petroleum, or
(b) to control the passage of petroleum into, out of, through or within the system,
and includes any structure through which petroleum routinely passes from one part of the system to another.
the Act means the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997.
use a storage system includes allow petroleum to remain in the system.
Note.
The Act and the Interpretation Act 1987 contain definitions and other provisions that affect the interpretation and application of this Regulation.
For example, appropriate regulatory authority is defined in section 6 of the Act. When this Regulation commenced, the EPA was the appropriate regulatory authority for matters arising under this Regulation in relation to some existing notices, directions or requirements: see clause 91 of the Protection of the Environment Operations (General) Regulation 2009. Otherwise the default position in section 6 of the Act had effect.
(2) Notes included in this Regulation do not form part of this Regulation.
4 Meaning of “person responsible” for a storage system
4 Meaning of “person responsible” for a storage system
4 Meaning of “person responsible” for a storage system
In this Regulation, person responsible for a storage system means—
(a) if the storage system has not yet been commissioned—the person who has management and control of the storage system, or
(b) if the storage system is in use—the person who has management and control of the storage system, or
(c) if the storage system is no longer in use but has not been decommissioned—
(i) the person who had management and control of the storage system immediately before the storage system ceased to be used, or
(ii) if that person cannot be located—the person who owns the land on which the storage system is located.
5 Application of Regulation
5 Application of Regulation
5 Application of Regulation
This Regulation applies to all storage systems other than the following—
(a) a storage system whose tanks are situated wholly above ground, together with any associated pipes, valves and other equipment (whether situated above or below ground),
(b) a sump, separator, stormwater or wastewater collection system, catchment basin, pit, septic tank or other like structure (unless petroleum routinely passes through the structure from one part of a storage system to another),
(c) a bunded tank situated below ground level but not in the ground (such as in a basement, cellar or tunnel),
(d) a liquefied petroleum gas storage system.
Part 2 Commissioning of storage systems
Part 2 Commissioning of storage systems
Part 2 Commissioning of storage systems
Division 1 Installation of new storage systems
Division 1 Installation of new storage systems
Division 1 Installation of new storage systems
6 New system not to be commissioned unless properly designed
6 New system not to be commissioned unless properly designed
6 New system not to be commissioned unless properly designed
The person responsible for a storage system must not commission the system, or authorise or permit the commissioning of the system, unless—
(a) the system has been designed by a duly qualified person, and
(b) the person by whom the system has been designed has provided the person responsible for the system with—
(i) a list of the industry standards that have been followed in connection with the design of the system, and
(ii) a copy of the design specifications for the system.
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
7 New system not to be commissioned unless properly installed
7 New system not to be commissioned unless properly installed
7 New system not to be commissioned unless properly installed
The person responsible for a storage system must not commission the system, or authorise or permit the commissioning of the system, unless—
(a) the system has been installed by a duly qualified person, and
(b) the person by whom the system has been installed has provided the person responsible for the system with—
(i) a list of the industry standards that have been followed in connection with the installation of the system, and
(ii) a copy of the installation specifications for the system, and
(iii) current “as-built” drawings for the system.
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
8 New system not to be commissioned unless properly equipped
8 New system not to be commissioned unless properly equipped
8 New system not to be commissioned unless properly equipped
The person responsible for a storage system must not commission the system, or authorise or permit the commissioning of the system, unless—
(a) the system includes the equipment required by AS 4897–2008: The design, installation and operation of underground petroleum storage systems, as in force from time to time, and
(b) a leak detection system is installed on the storage site in accordance with Part 3.
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
9 Equipment integrity test to be performed
9 Equipment integrity test to be performed
9 Equipment integrity test to be performed
The person responsible for a storage system must not commission the system, or authorise or permit the commissioning of the system, unless—
(a) an equipment integrity test of the system has been carried out in accordance with the written directions of a duly qualified person, and
(b) the system has been certified, by the person by whom the test was carried out, as having satisfied the test, and
(c) the person responsible has been provided with the certificate and the results of the equipment integrity test.
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
Division 2 Modification of storage systems
Division 2 Modification of storage systems
Division 2 Modification of storage systems
10 Modified system not to be commissioned unless properly designed
10 Modified system not to be commissioned unless properly designed
10 Modified system not to be commissioned unless properly designed
The person responsible for a modified storage system must not commission the system, or authorise or permit the commissioning of the system, unless—
(a) the modification has been designed by a duly qualified person, and
(b) the person by whom the modification has been designed has provided the person responsible for the system with—
(i) a list of the industry standards that have been followed in connection with the design of the modification, and
(ii) a copy of the design specifications for the modification.
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
11 Modified system not to be commissioned unless properly installed
11 Modified system not to be commissioned unless properly installed
11 Modified system not to be commissioned unless properly installed
The person responsible for a modified storage system must not commission the system, or authorise or permit the commissioning of the system, unless—
(a) the modification has been implemented by a duly qualified person, and
(b) the person by whom the modification has been implemented has provided the person responsible for the system with—
(i) a list of the industry standards that have been followed in connection with the implementation of the modification, and
(ii) a copy of the implementation specifications for the modification, and
(iii) current “as-built” drawings for the system.
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
12 Modified system not to be commissioned unless properly equipped
12 Modified system not to be commissioned unless properly equipped
12 Modified system not to be commissioned unless properly equipped
(1) The person responsible for a modified storage system must not commission the system, or authorise or permit the commissioning of the system, unless—
(a) the system includes the equipment required by AS 4897–2008: The design, installation and operation of underground petroleum storage systems, as in force from time to time, and
(b) a leak detection system is installed on the storage site in accordance with Part 3.
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
(2) Subclause (1)(a) does not require a system commissioned before 1 June 2008 to include the equipment referred to in that paragraph unless the modification is a significant modification.
13 Equipment integrity test to be performed
13 Equipment integrity test to be performed
13 Equipment integrity test to be performed
(1) The person responsible for a modified storage system must not commission the system, or authorise or permit the commissioning of the system, unless—
(a) an equipment integrity test of the system has been carried out in accordance with the written directions of a duly qualified person, and
(b) the system has been certified, by the person by whom the test was carried out, as having satisfied the test, and
(c) the person responsible has been provided with the certificate and the results of the equipment integrity test.
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
(2) The person responsible for a modified storage system must not reuse a tank for the system before the system is recommissioned, or authorise or permit the reuse of a tank before the system is recommissioned, unless—
(a) an equipment integrity test of the tank has been carried out in accordance with the written directions of a duly qualified person, and
(b) the tank has been certified, by the person by whom the test was carried out, as having satisfied the test, and
(c) the person responsible has been provided with the certificate and the results of the equipment integrity test.
Maximum penalty—200 penalty units (in the case of an individual) and 400 penalty units (in the case of a corporation).
Division 3 Repair of storage systems
Division 3 Repair of storage systems
Division 3 Repair of storage systems
14 Equipment integrity test to be performed
14 Equipment integrity test to be performed
14 Equipment integrity test to be performed
The person responsible for a storage system that has been repaired following the discovery of a leak in the system must not commission the system, or authorise or permit the commissioning of the system, unless—
This is an opening excerpt, not the complete document.