This Act sets procedural and oversight rules for the police service and the Crime and Corruption Commission (CCC) when seeking telecommunications interception warrants or international production orders. It requires officers to notify the PIM, disclose all material, keep detailed interception records, allow inspections by an inspecting entity, and report to State and Commonwealth ministers.
It affects officers, chief officers, the PIM, deputy PIMs, the parliamentary commissioner and inspecting entities by imposing compliance, record‑keeping, confidentiality and reporting duties, penalties for unlawful disclosure or obstruction, and limits on judicial review.
Mechanically, this Act establishes a state-level framework for recording, reporting, inspection and information-handling obligations that sit alongside the Commonwealth telecommunications interception regime. It does three concrete things. First, it creates a mandatory notification, disclosure and participation role for a person in monitoring functions (the PIM) where an officer of an eligible authority proposes to apply for certain interception-related orders under the Commonwealth Act (see Pt 2, especially ss 6-11). Second, it imposes record-keeping, secure storage, destruction and reporting duties on the chief officer of each eligible authority in relation to part 2-5 warrants obtained under the Commonwealth Act (see Pt 3, especially ss 14-20), and requires corresponding reports to the State Minister and onward transmission to the Commonwealth Minister (ss 16-17, 31). Third, it establishes an inspecting entity function with statutory powers to inspect part 2-5 warrant records at specified frequencies, to require information and attendance, and to report on compliance to the Minister and to other specified recipients (Pt 4, especially ss 22-29, 23-24).
The Act expressly ties its terminology and many duties to the Commonwealth Act, by importing meanings for undefined expressions (s 4) and by repeatedly requiring compliance with or disclosure of material that the Commonwealth Act specifies (for example ss 7, 9, 14, 24). The Act states its principal policy objective as enabling the police service and the Crime and Corruption Commission (CCC) to use telecommunications interception for investigating serious offences, by establishing the recording, reporting and inspection regime the Commonwealth Minister requires to declare those bodies agencies under the Commonwealth Act (s 5). That is a stated purpose, set out in the text; the Act does not itself adjudicate whether that purpose is required or sufficient.
Current sections
Direct links to the current provisions in Telecommunications Interception Act 2009.
47
pt.1
Preliminary
Preliminary
sec.1
Short title
sec.1 Short title
This Act may be cited as the Telecommunications Interception Act 2009 .
sec.2
Commencement
sec.2 Commencement
This Act commences on a day to be fixed by proclamation.
sec.3
Dictionary
sec.3 Dictionary
The dictionary in the schedule defines particular words used in this Act.
sec.4
Meaning of expressions used in Commonwealth Act
sec.4 Meaning of expressions used in Commonwealth Act
Unless the contrary intention appears, a word or expression used in this Act that is not defined in this Act has the meaning given by the Commonwealth Act .
sec.5
Objective
sec.5 Objective
The main objective of this Act is to enable the use by the police service and the CCC of telecommunications interception as a tool for the investigation of serious offences.
The main objective is to be achieved by establishing a recording, reporting and inspection regime required under the Commonwealth Act for the Commonwealth Minister to be able to declare the police service and the CCC to be agencies under the Commonwealth Act .
s 5 amd 2014 No. 21 s 94 (2) sch 2
(sec.5-ssec.1) The main objective of this Act is to enable the use by the police service and the CCC of telecommunications interception as a tool for the investigation of serious offences.
(sec.5-ssec.2) The main objective is to be achieved by establishing a recording, reporting and inspection regime required under the Commonwealth Act for the Commonwealth Minister to be able to declare the police service and the CCC to be agencies under the Commonwealth Act .
pt.2
Notification to and appearance of PIM
Notification to and appearance of PIM
sec.6
Application of pt 2
sec.6 Application of pt 2
This part applies if an officer of an eligible authority intends to make—
an application for a part 2-5 warrant under the Commonwealth Act , section 39 (a part 2-5 warrant application ); or
an application for an international production order under the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 22 (an IPO (investigative) application ); or
an application for an international production order under the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 52 (an IPO (supervisory) application ).
s 6 sub 2023 No. 1 s 83
(a) an application for a part 2-5 warrant under the Commonwealth Act , section 39 (a part 2-5 warrant application ); or
(b) an application for an international production order under the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 22 (an IPO (investigative) application ); or
(c) an application for an international production order under the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 52 (an IPO (supervisory) application ).
sec.7
PIM must be notified
sec.7 PIM must be notified
The officer must notify the PIM of the application under arrangements decided by the PIM.
If the officer intends to make the application in writing, the officer must give the PIM—
a copy of the written application; and
a copy of the affidavit required to accompany the written application under—
for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 42 ; or
for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 25; or
for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 55.
If the officer intends to make the application by telephone, the officer must give the PIM the information required to be given on a telephone application under—
for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 43 ; or
for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 26; or
for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 56.
s 7 amd 2023 No. 1 s 84
(sec.7-ssec.1) The officer must notify the PIM of the application under arrangements decided by the PIM.
(sec.7-ssec.2) If the officer intends to make the application in writing, the officer must give the PIM— a copy of the written application; and a copy of the affidavit required to accompany the written application under— for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 42 ; or for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 25; or for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 55.
(sec.7-ssec.3) If the officer intends to make the application by telephone, the officer must give the PIM the information required to be given on a telephone application under— for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 43 ; or for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 26; or for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 56.
(a) a copy of the written application; and
(b) a copy of the affidavit required to accompany the written application under— (i) for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 42 ; or (ii) for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 25; or (iii) for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 55.
(i) for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 42 ; or
(ii) for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 25; or
(iii) for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 55.
(i) for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 42 ; or
(ii) for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 25; or
(iii) for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 55.
(a) for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 43 ; or
(b) for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 26; or
(c) for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 56.
sec.8
Full disclosure to PIM
sec.8 Full disclosure to PIM
The officer must also fully disclose to the PIM all matters of which the officer is aware, both favourable and adverse to the issuing of the part 2-5 warrant or international production order.
s 8 amd 2023 No. 1 s 85
sec.9
PIM to be given further information
sec.9 PIM to be given further information
The officer must also give the PIM any further information that is required to be given to the eligible Judge or nominated ART member in connection with the application under—
for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 44 ; or
for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 27; or
for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 57.
s 9 sub 2023 No. 1 s 86
amd 2024 No. 47 s 78 sch 2
(a) for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 44 ; or
(b) for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 27; or
(c) for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 57.
sec.10
PIM entitled to appear
sec.10 PIM entitled to appear
To test the validity of the application, the PIM is entitled to appear at the hearing of the application, make submissions to the eligible Judge or nominated ART member and question persons as provided under—
for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 45 ; or
for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 29; or
for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 59.
As soon as practicable after the application is heard, the PIM must return to the officer any documents given by the officer to the PIM under section 7 , 8 or 9 in relation to the application.
s 10 amd 2023 No. 1 s 87 ; 2024 No. 47 s 78 sch 2
(sec.10-ssec.1) To test the validity of the application, the PIM is entitled to appear at the hearing of the application, make submissions to the eligible Judge or nominated ART member and question persons as provided under— for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 45 ; or for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 29; or for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 59.
(sec.10-ssec.2) As soon as practicable after the application is heard, the PIM must return to the officer any documents given by the officer to the PIM under section 7 , 8 or 9 in relation to the application.
(a) for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 45 ; or
(b) for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 29; or
(c) for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 59.
sec.11
Confidentiality obligations not to apply
sec.11 Confidentiality obligations not to apply
This section applies to—
an officer of an eligible authority; and
a person questioned by the PIM in relation to an application as mentioned in section 10 (1) .
An obligation to maintain secrecy in relation to, or that otherwise restricts, the disclosure of information or the production of documents in the possession of the person, whether imposed under an Act or by a rule of law, does not apply to the disclosure of information or the production of a document under this part.
s 11 amd 2023 No. 1 s 88
(sec.11-ssec.1) This section applies to— an officer of an eligible authority; and a person questioned by the PIM in relation to an application as mentioned in section 10 (1) .
(sec.11-ssec.2) An obligation to maintain secrecy in relation to, or that otherwise restricts, the disclosure of information or the production of documents in the possession of the person, whether imposed under an Act or by a rule of law, does not apply to the disclosure of information or the production of a document under this part.
(a) an officer of an eligible authority; and
(b) a person questioned by the PIM in relation to an application as mentioned in section 10 (1) .
sec.12
PIM to report to Minister about noncompliance
sec.12 PIM to report to Minister about noncompliance
Whenever the PIM considers it appropriate, the PIM may give the Minister a report on noncompliance by an eligible authority with this Act or the Commonwealth Act .
The report must not contain information mentioned in—
for a report relating to a part 2-5 warrant —the Commonwealth Act , section 63 ; or
for a report relating to an international production order—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 152.
The PIM must give a copy of the report to—
if the eligible authority is the CCC—the parliamentary commissioner and the parliamentary committee; or
if the eligible authority is the police service—the Police Minister.
s 12 amd 2014 No. 21 s 94 (2) sch 2 ; 2023 No. 1 s 89
(sec.12-ssec.1) Whenever the PIM considers it appropriate, the PIM may give the Minister a report on noncompliance by an eligible authority with this Act or the Commonwealth Act .
(sec.12-ssec.2) The report must not contain information mentioned in— for a report relating to a part 2-5 warrant —the Commonwealth Act , section 63 ; or for a report relating to an international production order—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 152.
(sec.12-ssec.3) The PIM must give a copy of the report to— if the eligible authority is the CCC—the parliamentary commissioner and the parliamentary committee; or if the eligible authority is the police service—the Police Minister.
(a) for a report relating to a part 2-5 warrant —the Commonwealth Act , section 63 ; or
(b) for a report relating to an international production order—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 152.
(a) if the eligible authority is the CCC—the parliamentary commissioner and the parliamentary committee; or
(b) if the eligible authority is the police service—the Police Minister.
sec.13
Relationship of provisions of other Acts to PIM and deputy PIMs
sec.13 Relationship of provisions of other Acts to PIM and deputy PIMs
The Police Powers and Responsibilities Act 2000 , section 740 and the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 , section 324 provide for the appointment of a PIM and 1 or more deputy PIMs (each an appointment provision of an appointment Act ).
However, despite the functions and powers of a PIM or deputy PIM mentioned in an appointment provision or any other provision of an appointment Act—
the functions and powers do not apply for the purposes of this Act; and
the PIM and deputy PIM have instead the functions or powers conferred by this Act.
s 13 amd 2014 No. 21 s 94 (2) sch 2
(sec.13-ssec.1) The Police Powers and Responsibilities Act 2000 , section 740 and the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 , section 324 provide for the appointment of a PIM and 1 or more deputy PIMs (each an appointment provision of an appointment Act ).
(sec.13-ssec.2) However, despite the functions and powers of a PIM or deputy PIM mentioned in an appointment provision or any other provision of an appointment Act— the functions and powers do not apply for the purposes of this Act; and the PIM and deputy PIM have instead the functions or powers conferred by this Act.
(a) the functions and powers do not apply for the purposes of this Act; and
(b) the PIM and deputy PIM have instead the functions or powers conferred by this Act.
pt.3
Record-keeping and related functions of eligible authorities relating to part 2-5 warrants
Record-keeping and related functions of eligible authorities relating to part 2-5 warrants
sec.14
Eligible authority to keep documents connected with issue of part 2-5 warrants
sec.14 Eligible authority to keep documents connected with issue of part 2-5 warrants
The chief officer of an eligible authority must cause the following to be kept in the authority’s part 2-5 warrant records—
each approval to exercise the authority conferred by part 2-5 warrants given under section 55 (3) of the Commonwealth Act ;
each appointment of an officer of the eligible authority to be an approving officer made under section 55 (4) of the Commonwealth Act ;
each part 2-5 warrant issued to the authority;
a copy of each document, other than a document mentioned in section 10 (2) , given by the PIM to an officer of the eligible authority under part 2 in relation to the issue of the part 2-5 warrant ;
a copy of each notification given to the secretary of the Commonwealth department under section 59A (2) of the Commonwealth Act ;
each instrument revoking a part 2-5 warrant ;
a copy of each certificate issued under section 61 (4) of the Commonwealth Act by a certifying officer of the authority;
each appointment of an officer of the eligible authority to be an authorising officer made under section 66 (4) of the Commonwealth Act ;
each authorisation by the chief officer, or an authorising officer of the eligible authority, given under section 66 (2) of the Commonwealth Act .
s 14 amd 2017 No. 6 s 74 ; 2023 No. 1 s 97 s ch 1 pt 1
(a) each approval to exercise the authority conferred by part 2-5 warrants given under section 55 (3) of the Commonwealth Act ;
(b) each appointment of an officer of the eligible authority to be an approving officer made under section 55 (4) of the Commonwealth Act ;
(c) each part 2-5 warrant issued to the authority;
(d) a copy of each document, other than a document mentioned in section 10 (2) , given by the PIM to an officer of the eligible authority under part 2 in relation to the issue of the part 2-5 warrant ;
(e) a copy of each notification given to the secretary of the Commonwealth department under section 59A (2) of the Commonwealth Act ;
(f) each instrument revoking a part 2-5 warrant ;
(g) a copy of each certificate issued under section 61 (4) of the Commonwealth Act by a certifying officer of the authority;
(h) each appointment of an officer of the eligible authority to be an authorising officer made under section 66 (4) of the Commonwealth Act ;
(i) each authorisation by the chief officer, or an authorising officer of the eligible authority, given under section 66 (2) of the Commonwealth Act .
sec.15
Other part 2-5 warrant records to be kept by eligible authority in connection with interceptions under part 2-5 warrants
sec.15 Other part 2-5 warrant records to be kept by eligible authority in connection with interceptions under part 2-5 warrants
The chief officer of an eligible authority must cause to be recorded in writing—
particulars of each part 2-5 warrant application made by the authority by telephone, including, for example, particulars of—
the information given to the eligible Judge or nominated ART member on the application; and
the further information, if any, required by the eligible Judge or nominated ART member to be given in connection with the application; and
for each part 2-5 warrant application made by the authority, a statement as to whether—
the application was withdrawn or refused; or
a warrant was issued on the application; and
for each part 2-5 warrant whose authority is exercised by the eligible authority, particulars of—
the warrant; and
the day and time each interception under the warrant began; and
how long each interception lasted; and
the name of the person who carried out each interception; and
for a named person warrant—each service to or from which communications have been intercepted under the warrant; and
for each restricted record that has at any time been in the authority’s possession, particulars of—
if the restricted record is a record obtained by an interception under a part 2-5 warrant issued to the authority—that part 2-5 warrant ; and
each occasion when the restricted record came, whether by its making or otherwise, to be in the authority’s possession; and
each occasion, if any, when the restricted record stopped, whether by its destruction or otherwise, being in the authority’s possession; and
each other agency or other body, if any, from or to which, or other person, if any, from or to whom, the authority received or supplied the restricted record; and
particulars of each use made by the authority of lawfully intercepted information; and
particulars of each communication by an officer of the authority to a person or body other than an officer of the authority of lawfully intercepted information; and
particulars of each occasion when, to the knowledge of an officer of the authority, lawfully intercepted information was given in evidence in a relevant proceeding in relation to the authority.
The record must be made as soon as practicable after the happening of the events to which the particulars relate or the statement relates.
If a part 2-5 warrant is a named person warrant, the particulars mentioned in subsection (1) (c) (ii) must indicate the service in relation to which each interception happened.
The chief officer of an eligible authority must cause to be kept in the authority’s part 2-5 warrant records each record that the chief officer has caused to be made under this section.
s 15 amd 2023 No. 1 s 97 s ch 1 pt 1 ; 2024 No. 47 s 78 sch 2
(sec.15-ssec.1) The chief officer of an eligible authority must cause to be recorded in writing— particulars of each part 2-5 warrant application made by the authority by telephone, including, for example, particulars of— the information given to the eligible Judge or nominated ART member on the application; and the further information, if any, required by the eligible Judge or nominated ART member to be given in connection with the application; and for each part 2-5 warrant application made by the authority, a statement as to whether— the application was withdrawn or refused; or a warrant was issued on the application; and for each part 2-5 warrant whose authority is exercised by the eligible authority, particulars of— the warrant; and the day and time each interception under the warrant began; and how long each interception lasted; and the name of the person who carried out each interception; and for a named person warrant—each service to or from which communications have been intercepted under the warrant; and for each restricted record that has at any time been in the authority’s possession, particulars of— if the restricted record is a record obtained by an interception under a part 2-5 warrant issued to the authority—that part 2-5 warrant ; and each occasion when the restricted record came, whether by its making or otherwise, to be in the authority’s possession; and each occasion, if any, when the restricted record stopped, whether by its destruction or otherwise, being in the authority’s possession; and each other agency or other body, if any, from or to which, or other person, if any, from or to whom, the authority received or supplied the restricted record; and particulars of each use made by the authority of lawfully intercepted information; and particulars of each communication by an officer of the authority to a person or body other than an officer of the authority of lawfully intercepted information; and particulars of each occasion when, to the knowledge of an officer of the authority, lawfully intercepted information was given in evidence in a relevant proceeding in relation to the authority.
(sec.15-ssec.2) The record must be made as soon as practicable after the happening of the events to which the particulars relate or the statement relates.
(sec.15-ssec.3) If a part 2-5 warrant is a named person warrant, the particulars mentioned in subsection (1) (c) (ii) must indicate the service in relation to which each interception happened.
(sec.15-ssec.4) The chief officer of an eligible authority must cause to be kept in the authority’s part 2-5 warrant records each record that the chief officer has caused to be made under this section.
(a) particulars of each part 2-5 warrant application made by the authority by telephone, including, for example, particulars of— (i) the information given to the eligible Judge or nominated ART member on the application; and (ii) the further information, if any, required by the eligible Judge or nominated ART member to be given in connection with the application; and
(i) the information given to the eligible Judge or nominated ART member on the application; and
(ii) the further information, if any, required by the eligible Judge or nominated ART member to be given in connection with the application; and
(b) for each part 2-5 warrant application made by the authority, a statement as to whether— (i) the application was withdrawn or refused; or (ii) a warrant was issued on the application; and
(i) the application was withdrawn or refused; or
(ii) a warrant was issued on the application; and
(c) for each part 2-5 warrant whose authority is exercised by the eligible authority, particulars of— (i) the warrant; and (ii) the day and time each interception under the warrant began; and (iii) how long each interception lasted; and (iv) the name of the person who carried out each interception; and (v) for a named person warrant—each service to or from which communications have been intercepted under the warrant; and
(i) the warrant; and
(ii) the day and time each interception under the warrant began; and
(iii) how long each interception lasted; and
(iv) the name of the person who carried out each interception; and
(v) for a named person warrant—each service to or from which communications have been intercepted under the warrant; and
(d) for each restricted record that has at any time been in the authority’s possession, particulars of— (i) if the restricted record is a record obtained by an interception under a part 2-5 warrant issued to the authority—that part 2-5 warrant ; and (ii) each occasion when the restricted record came, whether by its making or otherwise, to be in the authority’s possession; and (iii) each occasion, if any, when the restricted record stopped, whether by its destruction or otherwise, being in the authority’s possession; and (iv) each other agency or other body, if any, from or to which, or other person, if any, from or to whom, the authority received or supplied the restricted record; and
(i) if the restricted record is a record obtained by an interception under a part 2-5 warrant issued to the authority—that part 2-5 warrant ; and
(ii) each occasion when the restricted record came, whether by its making or otherwise, to be in the authority’s possession; and
(iii) each occasion, if any, when the restricted record stopped, whether by its destruction or otherwise, being in the authority’s possession; and
(iv) each other agency or other body, if any, from or to which, or other person, if any, from or to whom, the authority received or supplied the restricted record; and
(e) particulars of each use made by the authority of lawfully intercepted information; and
(f) particulars of each communication by an officer of the authority to a person or body other than an officer of the authority of lawfully intercepted information; and
(g) particulars of each occasion when, to the knowledge of an officer of the authority, lawfully intercepted information was given in evidence in a relevant proceeding in relation to the authority.
(i) the information given to the eligible Judge or nominated ART member on the application; and
(ii) the further information, if any, required by the eligible Judge or nominated ART member to be given in connection with the application; and
(i) the application was withdrawn or refused; or
(ii) a warrant was issued on the application; and
(i) the warrant; and
(ii) the day and time each interception under the warrant began; and
(iii) how long each interception lasted; and
(iv) the name of the person who carried out each interception; and
(v) for a named person warrant—each service to or from which communications have been intercepted under the warrant; and
(i) if the restricted record is a record obtained by an interception under a part 2-5 warrant issued to the authority—that part 2-5 warrant ; and
(ii) each occasion when the restricted record came, whether by its making or otherwise, to be in the authority’s possession; and
(iii) each occasion, if any, when the restricted record stopped, whether by its destruction or otherwise, being in the authority’s possession; and
(iv) each other agency or other body, if any, from or to which, or other person, if any, from or to whom, the authority received or supplied the restricted record; and
sec.16
Documents to be given by eligible authority to State Minister
sec.16 Documents to be given by eligible authority to State Minister
The chief officer of an eligible authority must give the Minister—
within 3 months after a part 2-5 warrant issued to the authority stops being in force, a written report about—
the use made by the authority of information obtained by interceptions under the warrant; and
the communication of that information to persons other than officers of the authority; and
as soon as practicable, and in any event within 3 months after each 30 June, a written report that sets out the information that—
part 2 -8, division 2 of the Commonwealth Act requires to be set out in the Commonwealth Minister’s report under part 2 -8, division 2 for the year ending on that 30 June; and
can be derived from the authority’s part 2 -5 warrant records.
s 16 amd 2023 No. 1 s 97 s ch 1 pt 1
(a) within 3 months after a part 2-5 warrant issued to the authority stops being in force, a written report about— (i) the use made by the authority of information obtained by interceptions under the warrant; and (ii) the communication of that information to persons other than officers of the authority; and
(i) the use made by the authority of information obtained by interceptions under the warrant; and
(ii) the communication of that information to persons other than officers of the authority; and
(b) as soon as practicable, and in any event within 3 months after each 30 June, a written report that sets out the information that— (i) part 2 -8, division 2 of the Commonwealth Act requires to be set out in the Commonwealth Minister’s report under part 2 -8, division 2 for the year ending on that 30 June; and (ii) can be derived from the authority’s part 2 -5 warrant records.
(i) part 2 -8, division 2 of the Commonwealth Act requires to be set out in the Commonwealth Minister’s report under part 2 -8, division 2 for the year ending on that 30 June; and
(ii) can be derived from the authority’s part 2 -5 warrant records.
(i) the use made by the authority of information obtained by interceptions under the warrant; and
(ii) the communication of that information to persons other than officers of the authority; and
(i) part 2 -8, division 2 of the Commonwealth Act requires to be set out in the Commonwealth Minister’s report under part 2 -8, division 2 for the year ending on that 30 June; and
(ii) can be derived from the authority’s part 2 -5 warrant records.
sec.17
Documents to be given by State Minister to Commonwealth Minister
sec.17 Documents to be given by State Minister to Commonwealth Minister
The Minister must give the Commonwealth Minister a copy of a report mentioned in section 16 (a) or (b) .
The copy of the report must be given to the Commonwealth Minister as soon as practicable after it is given to the Minister.
(sec.17-ssec.1) The Minister must give the Commonwealth Minister a copy of a report mentioned in section 16 (a) or (b) .
(sec.17-ssec.2) The copy of the report must be given to the Commonwealth Minister as soon as practicable after it is given to the Minister.
sec.18
Keeping of restricted records by eligible authority
sec.18 Keeping of restricted records by eligible authority
The chief officer of an eligible authority must cause a restricted record in the possession of the authority to be kept, other than when it is being otherwise dealt with under the Commonwealth Act and this Act, in a secure place where it is not accessible to persons other than persons who are entitled to deal with it.
sec.19
Destruction of restricted records by eligible authority
sec.19 Destruction of restricted records by eligible authority
Subject to section 20 , the chief officer of an eligible authority must cause a restricted record of a type mentioned in section 18 to be destroyed immediately if the chief officer is satisfied the restricted record is not likely to be required for a permitted purpose in relation to the eligible authority.
For subsection (1) , a permitted purpose does not include a purpose connected with—
an inspection of a type mentioned in section 22 (1) (a) ; or
a report on an inspection of a type mentioned in section 22 (1) (a) .
(sec.19-ssec.1) Subject to section 20 , the chief officer of an eligible authority must cause a restricted record of a type mentioned in section 18 to be destroyed immediately if the chief officer is satisfied the restricted record is not likely to be required for a permitted purpose in relation to the eligible authority.
(sec.19-ssec.2) For subsection (1) , a permitted purpose does not include a purpose connected with— an inspection of a type mentioned in section 22 (1) (a) ; or a report on an inspection of a type mentioned in section 22 (1) (a) .
(a) an inspection of a type mentioned in section 22 (1) (a) ; or
(b) a report on an inspection of a type mentioned in section 22 (1) (a) .
sec.20
Commonwealth Minister and inspecting entity to inspect restricted record before destruction
sec.20 Commonwealth Minister and inspecting entity to inspect restricted record before destruction
The chief officer of an eligible authority must not cause a restricted record to be destroyed under section 19 unless—
the chief officer has received from the secretary of the Commonwealth department written notice that the entry in the general register relating to the part 2 -5 warrant under which the restricted record was obtained has been inspected by the Commonwealth Minister; and
the chief officer first—
notifies the eligible authority’s inspecting entity that the chief officer intends to destroy the record; and
gives the inspecting entity the opportunity to inspect the record.
s 20 amd 2023 No. 1 s 97 s ch 1 pt 1
(a) the chief officer has received from the secretary of the Commonwealth department written notice that the entry in the general register relating to the part 2 -5 warrant under which the restricted record was obtained has been inspected by the Commonwealth Minister; and
(b) the chief officer first— (i) notifies the eligible authority’s inspecting entity that the chief officer intends to destroy the record; and (ii) gives the inspecting entity the opportunity to inspect the record.
(i) notifies the eligible authority’s inspecting entity that the chief officer intends to destroy the record; and
(ii) gives the inspecting entity the opportunity to inspect the record.
(i) notifies the eligible authority’s inspecting entity that the chief officer intends to destroy the record; and
(ii) gives the inspecting entity the opportunity to inspect the record.
pt.4
Functions and powers of inspecting entity for inspections relating to part 2-5 warrant records
Functions and powers of inspecting entity for inspections relating to part 2-5 warrant records
sec.21
Definition for pt 4
sec.21 Definition for pt 4
In this part—
officer , of an eligible authority, includes a person employed by or engaged in the authority.
sec.22
General functions and powers
sec.22 General functions and powers
An eligible authority’s inspecting entity—
must inspect the eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records as required under section 23 to ascertain the extent of compliance by the authority’s officers with sections 14 to 16 and 18 to 20 ; and
must report in writing to the Minister about the results of the inspections; and
may do anything necessary or convenient for the performance of the functions mentioned in paragraphs (a) and (b) .
However, a person who performs a function or exercises a power under part 2 in relation to a particular part 2-5 warrant application by an eligible authority must not undertake an inspection of the eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records for the purpose mentioned in subsection (1) (a) in relation to a record of the eligible authority that relates to the application.
If the PIM is unable, under subsection (2) , to undertake an inspection of the eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records in relation to a record of the eligible authority that relates to a particular part 2-5 warrant application, the inspection must be undertaken by a deputy PIM nominated by the PIM and for the purposes of the inspection—
the deputy PIM is not acting under a delegation of the PIM; and
the deputy PIM is taken to be the inspecting entity.
A deputy PIM must, if asked by a person affected by the exercise of a power by the deputy PIM under this part, produce the instrument of nomination, or a copy of the instrument, for the person’s inspection.
s 22 amd 2023 No. 1 s 97 s ch 1 pt 1
(sec.22-ssec.1) An eligible authority’s inspecting entity— must inspect the eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records as required under section 23 to ascertain the extent of compliance by the authority’s officers with sections 14 to 16 and 18 to 20 ; and must report in writing to the Minister about the results of the inspections; and may do anything necessary or convenient for the performance of the functions mentioned in paragraphs (a) and (b) .
(sec.22-ssec.2) However, a person who performs a function or exercises a power under part 2 in relation to a particular part 2-5 warrant application by an eligible authority must not undertake an inspection of the eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records for the purpose mentioned in subsection (1) (a) in relation to a record of the eligible authority that relates to the application.
(sec.22-ssec.3) If the PIM is unable, under subsection (2) , to undertake an inspection of the eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records in relation to a record of the eligible authority that relates to a particular part 2-5 warrant application, the inspection must be undertaken by a deputy PIM nominated by the PIM and for the purposes of the inspection— the deputy PIM is not acting under a delegation of the PIM; and the deputy PIM is taken to be the inspecting entity.
(sec.22-ssec.4) A deputy PIM must, if asked by a person affected by the exercise of a power by the deputy PIM under this part, produce the instrument of nomination, or a copy of the instrument, for the person’s inspection.
(a) must inspect the eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records as required under section 23 to ascertain the extent of compliance by the authority’s officers with sections 14 to 16 and 18 to 20 ; and
(b) must report in writing to the Minister about the results of the inspections; and
(c) may do anything necessary or convenient for the performance of the functions mentioned in paragraphs (a) and (b) .
(a) the deputy PIM is not acting under a delegation of the PIM; and
(b) the deputy PIM is taken to be the inspecting entity.
sec.23
Regular inspections of eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records
sec.23 Regular inspections of eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records
The inspecting entity must inspect the eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records at least once before the end of the financial year in which the eligible authority is declared to be an agency under the Commonwealth Act to find out the extent to which the authority’s officers have complied with sections 14 to 16 and 18 to 20 in relation to the records since the commencement of this Act.
After the financial year mentioned in subsection (1) , the inspecting entity must inspect the eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records at least twice during each financial year to find out the extent to which the authority’s officers have complied with sections 14 to 16 and 18 to 20 in relation to the records since the inspecting entity last inspected the authority’s part 2-5 warrant records under this part.
The inspecting entity may at any time inspect the eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records to find out the extent to which the authority’s officers have complied with sections 14 to 16 and 18 to 20 in relation to the records during any period.
s 23 amd 2023 No. 1 s 97 s ch 1 pt 1
(sec.23-ssec.1) The inspecting entity must inspect the eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records at least once before the end of the financial year in which the eligible authority is declared to be an agency under the Commonwealth Act to find out the extent to which the authority’s officers have complied with sections 14 to 16 and 18 to 20 in relation to the records since the commencement of this Act.
(sec.23-ssec.2) After the financial year mentioned in subsection (1) , the inspecting entity must inspect the eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records at least twice during each financial year to find out the extent to which the authority’s officers have complied with sections 14 to 16 and 18 to 20 in relation to the records since the inspecting entity last inspected the authority’s part 2-5 warrant records under this part.
(sec.23-ssec.3) The inspecting entity may at any time inspect the eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records to find out the extent to which the authority’s officers have complied with sections 14 to 16 and 18 to 20 in relation to the records during any period.
sec.24
Reports to Minister
sec.24 Reports to Minister
The inspecting entity, as soon as practicable, and in any event within 3 months after the end of each financial year, must report to the Minister in writing, in relation to the eligible authority, about the results of an inspection under section 23 of the authority’s part 2-5 warrant records to find out the extent to which the authority’s officers have complied with sections 14 , 15 , 18 and 19 in relation to the records.
The inspecting entity must include in each report under subsection (1) in relation to a financial year—
a summary of the inspections conducted in the financial year under section 23 ; and
particulars of any deficiencies identified that impact on the integrity of the telecommunications interception regime established by the Commonwealth Act ; and
particulars of the remedial action, if any, taken or proposed to be taken to address those deficiencies.
In complying with this section, the inspecting entity remains bound by the obligations imposed by section 63 of the Commonwealth Act relating to disclosure of intercepted information or interception warrant information.
The inspecting entity may report to the Minister in writing at any time about the results of an inspection under this part and must do so if requested by the Minister.
The inspecting entity must give the information in a report mentioned in subsection (1) or (3) , other than information mentioned in section 63 of the Commonwealth Act , to—
the chief officer of the eligible authority; and
if the eligible authority is the CCC—the parliamentary committee; and
if the eligible authority is the police service—the Police Minister.
s 24 amd 2014 No. 21 s 94 (2) sch 2 ; 2023 No. 1 s 97 s ch 1 pt 1
(sec.24-ssec.1) The inspecting entity, as soon as practicable, and in any event within 3 months after the end of each financial year, must report to the Minister in writing, in relation to the eligible authority, about the results of an inspection under section 23 of the authority’s part 2-5 warrant records to find out the extent to which the authority’s officers have complied with sections 14 , 15 , 18 and 19 in relation to the records.
(sec.24-ssec.2) The inspecting entity must include in each report under subsection (1) in relation to a financial year— a summary of the inspections conducted in the financial year under section 23 ; and particulars of any deficiencies identified that impact on the integrity of the telecommunications interception regime established by the Commonwealth Act ; and particulars of the remedial action, if any, taken or proposed to be taken to address those deficiencies. In complying with this section, the inspecting entity remains bound by the obligations imposed by section 63 of the Commonwealth Act relating to disclosure of intercepted information or interception warrant information.
(sec.24-ssec.3) The inspecting entity may report to the Minister in writing at any time about the results of an inspection under this part and must do so if requested by the Minister.
(sec.24-ssec.4) The inspecting entity must give the information in a report mentioned in subsection (1) or (3) , other than information mentioned in section 63 of the Commonwealth Act , to— the chief officer of the eligible authority; and if the eligible authority is the CCC—the parliamentary committee; and if the eligible authority is the police service—the Police Minister.
(a) a summary of the inspections conducted in the financial year under section 23 ; and
(b) particulars of any deficiencies identified that impact on the integrity of the telecommunications interception regime established by the Commonwealth Act ; and
(c) particulars of the remedial action, if any, taken or proposed to be taken to address those deficiencies.
(a) the chief officer of the eligible authority; and
(b) if the eligible authority is the CCC—the parliamentary committee; and
(c) if the eligible authority is the police service—the Police Minister.
sec.25
Inspecting entity may report on other contraventions
sec.25 Inspecting entity may report on other contraventions
If, because of an inspection under this part of an eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records, the inspecting entity considers an officer of the authority has contravened the Commonwealth Act or that the chief officer of the authority has contravened section 16 or 20 of this Act, the inspecting entity may include a report on the contravention in the report on the inspection.
However, before making a report on the contravention, the inspecting entity must give the chief officer of the eligible authority an opportunity to make comments in writing on the report and must include in the report any comments made.
To remove any doubt, it is declared that for the purposes of subsection (1) , a contravention of a condition or restriction specified in a warrant is a contravention of a provision of the Commonwealth Act .
s 25 amd 2023 No. 1 s 97 s ch 1 pt 1 ; 2024 No. 41 s 60
(sec.25-ssec.1) If, because of an inspection under this part of an eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records, the inspecting entity considers an officer of the authority has contravened the Commonwealth Act or that the chief officer of the authority has contravened section 16 or 20 of this Act, the inspecting entity may include a report on the contravention in the report on the inspection.
(sec.25-ssec.2) However, before making a report on the contravention, the inspecting entity must give the chief officer of the eligible authority an opportunity to make comments in writing on the report and must include in the report any comments made.
(sec.25-ssec.3) To remove any doubt, it is declared that for the purposes of subsection (1) , a contravention of a condition or restriction specified in a warrant is a contravention of a provision of the Commonwealth Act .
sec.26
Inspecting entity’s general powers for inspections
sec.26 Inspecting entity’s general powers for inspections
For an inspection under this part of an eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records, the inspecting entity—
may, after notifying the chief officer of the authority, enter at any reasonable time premises occupied by the authority; and
is entitled to have full and free access at all reasonable times to all part 2-5 warrant records of the authority; and
despite any other law, may make copies of, and take extracts from, part 2-5 warrant records of the authority; and
may require an officer of the authority to give the inspecting entity the information the inspecting entity considers necessary, being information that is in the officer’s possession, or to which the officer has access, and that is relevant to the inspection.
The chief officer of the eligible authority must ensure that the authority’s officers give the inspecting entity the help in connection with the performance of the inspecting entity’s functions under this part that the inspecting entity reasonably requires.
s 26 amd 2023 No. 1 s 97 s ch 1 pt 1
(sec.26-ssec.1) For an inspection under this part of an eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records, the inspecting entity— may, after notifying the chief officer of the authority, enter at any reasonable time premises occupied by the authority; and is entitled to have full and free access at all reasonable times to all part 2-5 warrant records of the authority; and despite any other law, may make copies of, and take extracts from, part 2-5 warrant records of the authority; and may require an officer of the authority to give the inspecting entity the information the inspecting entity considers necessary, being information that is in the officer’s possession, or to which the officer has access, and that is relevant to the inspection.
(sec.26-ssec.2) The chief officer of the eligible authority must ensure that the authority’s officers give the inspecting entity the help in connection with the performance of the inspecting entity’s functions under this part that the inspecting entity reasonably requires.
(a) may, after notifying the chief officer of the authority, enter at any reasonable time premises occupied by the authority; and
(b) is entitled to have full and free access at all reasonable times to all part 2-5 warrant records of the authority; and
(c) despite any other law, may make copies of, and take extracts from, part 2-5 warrant records of the authority; and
(d) may require an officer of the authority to give the inspecting entity the information the inspecting entity considers necessary, being information that is in the officer’s possession, or to which the officer has access, and that is relevant to the inspection.
sec.27
Inspecting entity’s power to obtain relevant information
sec.27 Inspecting entity’s power to obtain relevant information
Subsections (2) and (3) apply if the inspecting entity has reason to believe that an officer of the eligible authority is able to give information relevant to an inspection under this part of the eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records.
The inspecting entity may, by writing given to the officer, require the officer to give the information to the inspecting entity—
by writing signed by the officer; and
at a stated place and within a stated period.
The inspecting entity may, by writing given to the officer, require the officer to attend—
before the inspecting entity; and
at a stated place; and
within a stated period or at a stated time on a stated day;
to answer questions relevant to the inspection.
Subsection (5) applies if the inspecting entity has reason to believe that an officer of the eligible authority is able to give information relevant to an inspection under this part of the eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records but the inspecting entity does not know the officer’s identity.
The inspecting entity may, by writing given to the chief officer of the authority, require the chief officer, or a person nominated by the chief officer, to attend—
before the inspecting entity; and
at a stated place; and
within a stated period or at a stated time on a stated day;
to answer questions relevant to the inspection.
The place, the period or the time and day, stated in a requirement under this section must be reasonable, having regard to the circumstances in which the requirement is made.
s 27 amd 2023 No. 1 s 97 s ch 1 pt 1
(sec.27-ssec.1) Subsections (2) and (3) apply if the inspecting entity has reason to believe that an officer of the eligible authority is able to give information relevant to an inspection under this part of the eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records.
(sec.27-ssec.2) The inspecting entity may, by writing given to the officer, require the officer to give the information to the inspecting entity— by writing signed by the officer; and at a stated place and within a stated period.
(sec.27-ssec.3) The inspecting entity may, by writing given to the officer, require the officer to attend— before the inspecting entity; and at a stated place; and within a stated period or at a stated time on a stated day; to answer questions relevant to the inspection.
(sec.27-ssec.4) Subsection (5) applies if the inspecting entity has reason to believe that an officer of the eligible authority is able to give information relevant to an inspection under this part of the eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records but the inspecting entity does not know the officer’s identity.
(sec.27-ssec.5) The inspecting entity may, by writing given to the chief officer of the authority, require the chief officer, or a person nominated by the chief officer, to attend— before the inspecting entity; and at a stated place; and within a stated period or at a stated time on a stated day; to answer questions relevant to the inspection.
(sec.27-ssec.6) The place, the period or the time and day, stated in a requirement under this section must be reasonable, having regard to the circumstances in which the requirement is made.
(a) by writing signed by the officer; and
(b) at a stated place and within a stated period.
(a) before the inspecting entity; and
(b) at a stated place; and
(c) within a stated period or at a stated time on a stated day;
(a) before the inspecting entity; and
(b) at a stated place; and
(c) within a stated period or at a stated time on a stated day;
sec.28
Inspecting entity to be given information and access despite other laws
sec.28 Inspecting entity to be given information and access despite other laws
Despite any other law, a person is not excused from giving information, answering a question, or giving access to a document, as and when required under this part, on the ground that giving the information, answering the question, or giving access to the document—
would contravene a law; or
would be contrary to the public interest; or
might tend to incriminate the person or make the person liable for a penalty.
However—
the information, the answer, or the fact that the person has given access to the document; and
any information or thing, including a document, obtained as a direct or indirect consequence of giving the information, answering the question or giving access to the document;
is not admissible in evidence against the person other than in a prosecution for an offence against section 35 .
Nothing in any other law prevents an officer of an eligible authority from—
giving information to the inspecting entity, whether orally or in writing and whether or not in answer to a question; or
giving the inspecting entity access to a record of the authority;
for an inspection under this part of the authority’s part 2-5 warrant records.
Nothing in any other law prevents an officer of an eligible authority from making a record of information, or causing a record of information to be made, for the purposes of giving the information to a person as permitted by subsection (3) .
s 28 amd 2023 No. 1 s 97 s ch 1 pt 1
(sec.28-ssec.1) Despite any other law, a person is not excused from giving information, answering a question, or giving access to a document, as and when required under this part, on the ground that giving the information, answering the question, or giving access to the document— would contravene a law; or would be contrary to the public interest; or might tend to incriminate the person or make the person liable for a penalty.
(sec.28-ssec.2) However— the information, the answer, or the fact that the person has given access to the document; and any information or thing, including a document, obtained as a direct or indirect consequence of giving the information, answering the question or giving access to the document; is not admissible in evidence against the person other than in a prosecution for an offence against section 35 .
(sec.28-ssec.3) Nothing in any other law prevents an officer of an eligible authority from— giving information to the inspecting entity, whether orally or in writing and whether or not in answer to a question; or giving the inspecting entity access to a record of the authority; for an inspection under this part of the authority’s part 2-5 warrant records.
(sec.28-ssec.4) Nothing in any other law prevents an officer of an eligible authority from making a record of information, or causing a record of information to be made, for the purposes of giving the information to a person as permitted by subsection (3) .
(a) would contravene a law; or
(b) would be contrary to the public interest; or
(c) might tend to incriminate the person or make the person liable for a penalty.
(a) the information, the answer, or the fact that the person has given access to the document; and
(b) any information or thing, including a document, obtained as a direct or indirect consequence of giving the information, answering the question or giving access to the document;
(a) giving information to the inspecting entity, whether orally or in writing and whether or not in answer to a question; or
(b) giving the inspecting entity access to a record of the authority;
sec.29
Dealing with information for purposes of inspection and report
sec.29 Dealing with information for purposes of inspection and report
If—
information is given to the inspecting entity, as permitted by section 28 (3) or this section, for an inspection, or for a report on an inspection, under this part of an eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records; or
the inspecting entity obtains information because of being given access to a record of the eligible authority, as permitted by section 28 (3) , for an inspection under this part of an authority’s part 2-5 warrant records;
the inspecting entity may, despite any other law, give to another inspecting entity, make use of, or make a record of, the information for an inspection, or for a report on an inspection, under this part of the authority’s part 2 -5 warrant records.
s 29 amd 2023 No. 1 s 97 s ch 1 pt 1 ; 2024 No. 41 s 61
(a) information is given to the inspecting entity, as permitted by section 28 (3) or this section, for an inspection, or for a report on an inspection, under this part of an eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records; or
(b) the inspecting entity obtains information because of being given access to a record of the eligible authority, as permitted by section 28 (3) , for an inspection under this part of an authority’s part 2-5 warrant records;
sec.30
Exchange of information between inspecting entity and Commonwealth ombudsman
sec.30 Exchange of information between inspecting entity and Commonwealth ombudsman
The inspecting entity may give the Commonwealth ombudsman information that—
relates to a Commonwealth agency; and
was obtained by the inspecting entity under this Act.
The inspecting entity may give information to the Commonwealth ombudsman under subsection (1) only if the inspecting entity is satisfied the giving of the information is necessary to enable the ombudsman to perform the ombudsman’s functions in relation to the Commonwealth agency.
The inspecting entity may receive from the Commonwealth ombudsman information relevant to the performance of the inspecting entity’s functions under this Act.
(sec.30-ssec.1) The inspecting entity may give the Commonwealth ombudsman information that— relates to a Commonwealth agency; and was obtained by the inspecting entity under this Act.
(sec.30-ssec.2) The inspecting entity may give information to the Commonwealth ombudsman under subsection (1) only if the inspecting entity is satisfied the giving of the information is necessary to enable the ombudsman to perform the ombudsman’s functions in relation to the Commonwealth agency.
(sec.30-ssec.3) The inspecting entity may receive from the Commonwealth ombudsman information relevant to the performance of the inspecting entity’s functions under this Act.
(a) relates to a Commonwealth agency; and
(b) was obtained by the inspecting entity under this Act.
pt.5
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous
sec.31
Copies of reports for Commonwealth Minister
sec.31 Copies of reports for Commonwealth Minister
As soon as practicable after a report is given to the Minister under section 24 (1) , the Minister must give the Commonwealth Minister a copy of the report.
sec.32
Delegation by parliamentary commissioner
sec.32 Delegation by parliamentary commissioner
The parliamentary commissioner may delegate any of the parliamentary commissioner’s powers under this Act to a legal practitioner engaged by the Speaker under the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 , section 315 (2) .
A delegate must, if asked by a person affected by the exercise of a power delegated to the delegate, produce the instrument of delegation, or a copy of the instrument, for the person’s inspection.
To remove any doubt, and without limiting the power of the parliamentary commissioner to delegate under this section, a reference in sections 27 (3) (a) and (5) (a) , 28 (3) and 29 to the parliamentary commissioner includes a reference to a legal practitioner acting under a delegation.
s 32 amd 2014 No. 21 s 94 (2) sch 2
(sec.32-ssec.1) The parliamentary commissioner may delegate any of the parliamentary commissioner’s powers under this Act to a legal practitioner engaged by the Speaker under the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 , section 315 (2) .
(sec.32-ssec.2) A delegate must, if asked by a person affected by the exercise of a power delegated to the delegate, produce the instrument of delegation, or a copy of the instrument, for the person’s inspection.
(sec.32-ssec.3) To remove any doubt, and without limiting the power of the parliamentary commissioner to delegate under this section, a reference in sections 27 (3) (a) and (5) (a) , 28 (3) and 29 to the parliamentary commissioner includes a reference to a legal practitioner acting under a delegation.
sec.33
Delegation by PIM
sec.33 Delegation by PIM
The PIM may delegate to a deputy PIM any of the PIM’s powers under this Act, other than a power to report to the Minister.
A delegate must, if asked by a person affected by the exercise of a power delegated to the delegate, produce the instrument of delegation, or a copy of the instrument, for the person’s inspection.
To remove any doubt, and without limiting the power of the PIM to delegate under this section, a reference in sections 14 (d) , 27 (3) (a) and (5) (a) , 28 (3) and 29 to the PIM includes a reference to a deputy PIM acting under a delegation.
This section is subject to section 22 (3) .
(sec.33-ssec.1) The PIM may delegate to a deputy PIM any of the PIM’s powers under this Act, other than a power to report to the Minister.
(sec.33-ssec.2) A delegate must, if asked by a person affected by the exercise of a power delegated to the delegate, produce the instrument of delegation, or a copy of the instrument, for the person’s inspection.
(sec.33-ssec.3) To remove any doubt, and without limiting the power of the PIM to delegate under this section, a reference in sections 14 (d) , 27 (3) (a) and (5) (a) , 28 (3) and 29 to the PIM includes a reference to a deputy PIM acting under a delegation.
(sec.33-ssec.4) This section is subject to section 22 (3) .
sec.34
General confidentiality provision
sec.34 General confidentiality provision
A person must not disclose any information or record obtained by the person because he or she is or was engaged in the administration of this Act, unless the disclosure is made—
under the Commonwealth Act ; or
for the discharge of the person’s functions under this Act; or
to the PIM for the discharge of the PIM’s functions under part 2 ; or
to an inspecting entity for the discharge of the inspecting entity’s functions under part 4 .
Maximum penalty—100 penalty units or 2 years imprisonment.
See also the following provisions of the Commonwealth Act —
section 63 (No dealing with intercepted information or interception warrant information)
section 105 (Contravention of section 7 or 63 )
schedule 1 , clause 152 (Prohibition on use, recording or disclosure of protected information or its admission in evidence).
Subsection (1) applies despite the provisions of another Act that may allow a person to disclose the information or a record obtained by the person because he or she is or was engaged in the administration of the other Act.
Subsection (1) does not apply to information received—
from the PIM under section 12 ; or
from an inspecting entity under section 24 (4) .
In this section—
disclose , in relation to any information or record, includes communicate to another person, make use of, make a record of, or give in evidence in a proceeding.
s 34 amd 2023 No. 1 s 92
(sec.34-ssec.1) A person must not disclose any information or record obtained by the person because he or she is or was engaged in the administration of this Act, unless the disclosure is made— under the Commonwealth Act ; or for the discharge of the person’s functions under this Act; or to the PIM for the discharge of the PIM’s functions under part 2 ; or to an inspecting entity for the discharge of the inspecting entity’s functions under part 4 . Maximum penalty—100 penalty units or 2 years imprisonment. See also the following provisions of the Commonwealth Act — section 63 (No dealing with intercepted information or interception warrant information) section 105 (Contravention of section 7 or 63 ) schedule 1 , clause 152 (Prohibition on use, recording or disclosure of protected information or its admission in evidence).
(sec.34-ssec.2) Subsection (1) applies despite the provisions of another Act that may allow a person to disclose the information or a record obtained by the person because he or she is or was engaged in the administration of the other Act.
(sec.34-ssec.3) Subsection (1) does not apply to information received— from the PIM under section 12 ; or from an inspecting entity under section 24 (4) .
(sec.34-ssec.4) In this section— disclose , in relation to any information or record, includes communicate to another person, make use of, make a record of, or give in evidence in a proceeding.
(a) under the Commonwealth Act ; or
(b) for the discharge of the person’s functions under this Act; or
(c) to the PIM for the discharge of the PIM’s functions under part 2 ; or
(d) to an inspecting entity for the discharge of the inspecting entity’s functions under part 4 .
• section 63 (No dealing with intercepted information or interception warrant information)
• section 105 (Contravention of section 7 or 63 )
• schedule 1 , clause 152 (Prohibition on use, recording or disclosure of protected information or its admission in evidence).
(a) from the PIM under section 12 ; or
(b) from an inspecting entity under section 24 (4) .
sec.35
Offences relating to inspections under pt 4
sec.35 Offences relating to inspections under pt 4
A person must not, without reasonable excuse, refuse or fail to do any of the following when required to do so under section 27 —
attend before a person;
give information;
answer a question.
Maximum penalty—20 penalty units or 6 months imprisonment.
A person must not—
without reasonable excuse, wilfully obstruct a person in connection with the exercise of the inspecting entity’s functions under part 4 ; or
give the inspecting entity, in connection with an inspection under part 4 , information or a statement that the person knows to be false or misleading in a material particular.
Maximum penalty—20 penalty units or 6 months imprisonment.
A complaint for an offence against subsection (2) (b) may state that information or a statement was ‘false or misleading’, without stating which.
(sec.35-ssec.1) A person must not, without reasonable excuse, refuse or fail to do any of the following when required to do so under section 27 — attend before a person; give information; answer a question. Maximum penalty—20 penalty units or 6 months imprisonment.
(sec.35-ssec.2) A person must not— without reasonable excuse, wilfully obstruct a person in connection with the exercise of the inspecting entity’s functions under part 4 ; or give the inspecting entity, in connection with an inspection under part 4 , information or a statement that the person knows to be false or misleading in a material particular. Maximum penalty—20 penalty units or 6 months imprisonment.
(sec.35-ssec.3) A complaint for an offence against subsection (2) (b) may state that information or a statement was ‘false or misleading’, without stating which.
(a) attend before a person;
(b) give information;
(c) answer a question.
(a) without reasonable excuse, wilfully obstruct a person in connection with the exercise of the inspecting entity’s functions under part 4 ; or
(b) give the inspecting entity, in connection with an inspection under part 4 , information or a statement that the person knows to be false or misleading in a material particular.
sec.36
Proceeding for offence
sec.36 Proceeding for offence
A proceeding for an offence against this Act must be taken in a summary way under the Justices Act 1886 .
A proceeding may be started within—
1 year after the offence is committed; or
1 year after the offence comes to the complainant’s knowledge, but within 2 years after the offence is committed.
(sec.36-ssec.1) A proceeding for an offence against this Act must be taken in a summary way under the Justices Act 1886 .
(sec.36-ssec.2) A proceeding may be started within— 1 year after the offence is committed; or 1 year after the offence comes to the complainant’s knowledge, but within 2 years after the offence is committed.
(a) 1 year after the offence is committed; or
(b) 1 year after the offence comes to the complainant’s knowledge, but within 2 years after the offence is committed.
sec.37
Protection from liability etc.
sec.37 Protection from liability etc.
This section applies to the following persons—
the PIM;
a deputy PIM;
a parliamentary commissioner officer;
a legal practitioner mentioned in section 32 (1) .
The person does not incur civil liability for an act done, or omission made, honestly and without negligence under this Act.
If subsection (2) prevents a civil liability attaching to a person, the liability instead attaches to the State.
The person may not be called to give evidence or produce any document in any court, or in any judicial proceedings, in relation to any matter coming to the person’s knowledge while performing functions under this Act.
In this section—
parliamentary commissioner officer means—
the parliamentary commissioner; or
an officer or employee of the parliamentary service assigned to the parliamentary commissioner; or
a person engaged to provide the parliamentary commissioner with services, information or advice.
(sec.37-ssec.1) This section applies to the following persons— the PIM; a deputy PIM; a parliamentary commissioner officer; a legal practitioner mentioned in section 32 (1) .
(sec.37-ssec.2) The person does not incur civil liability for an act done, or omission made, honestly and without negligence under this Act.
(sec.37-ssec.3) If subsection (2) prevents a civil liability attaching to a person, the liability instead attaches to the State.
(sec.37-ssec.4) The person may not be called to give evidence or produce any document in any court, or in any judicial proceedings, in relation to any matter coming to the person’s knowledge while performing functions under this Act.
(sec.37-ssec.5) In this section— parliamentary commissioner officer means— the parliamentary commissioner; or an officer or employee of the parliamentary service assigned to the parliamentary commissioner; or a person engaged to provide the parliamentary commissioner with services, information or advice.
(a) the PIM;
(b) a deputy PIM;
(c) a parliamentary commissioner officer;
(d) a legal practitioner mentioned in section 32 (1) .
(a) the parliamentary commissioner; or
(b) an officer or employee of the parliamentary service assigned to the parliamentary commissioner; or
(c) a person engaged to provide the parliamentary commissioner with services, information or advice.
sec.38
Application of Judicial Review Act 1991 to decisions made under Act
sec.38 Application of Judicial Review Act 1991 to decisions made under Act
The Judicial Review Act 1991 does not apply to a decision made, or purportedly made, under this Act.
Nothing in subsection (1) affects the Judicial Review Act 1991 , section 41 or 42 .
In this section—
decision includes a decision affected by jurisdictional error.
(sec.38-ssec.1) The Judicial Review Act 1991 does not apply to a decision made, or purportedly made, under this Act.
(sec.38-ssec.2) Nothing in subsection (1) affects the Judicial Review Act 1991 , section 41 or 42 .
(sec.38-ssec.3) In this section— decision includes a decision affected by jurisdictional error.
sec.39
Application of Public Records Act 2023 to particular activities and records
sec.39 Application of Public Records Act 2023 to particular activities and records
The Public Records Act 2023 does not apply to an activity or a record under parts 2 to 4 or section 31 .
s 39 amd 2023 No. 33 s 107 sch 5
sec.40
Regulation-making power
sec.40 Regulation-making power
The Governor in Council may make regulations under this Act.
pt.6
Transitional provision
Transitional provision
sec.41
Existing part 2-5 warrant applications
sec.41 Existing part 2-5 warrant applications
This section applies if an application for a part 2-5 warrant under the Commonwealth Act was made, but not decided, before the commencement.
This Act, as in force before the commencement, continues to apply in relation to the application as if the Domestic and Family Violence Protection (Combating Coercive Control) and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2023 had not been enacted.
s 41 ins 2023 No. 1 s 93
(sec.41-ssec.1) This section applies if an application for a part 2-5 warrant under the Commonwealth Act was made, but not decided, before the commencement.
(sec.41-ssec.2) This Act, as in force before the commencement, continues to apply in relation to the application as if the Domestic and Family Violence Protection (Combating Coercive Control) and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2023 had not been enacted.
Source text: opening excerpt
Sourced from Queensland Legislation (legislation.qld.gov.au), CC BY 4.0.
pt.1 Preliminary
Preliminary
sec.1 Short title
sec.1 Short title
This Act may be cited as the Telecommunications Interception Act 2009 .
sec.2 Commencement
sec.2 Commencement
This Act commences on a day to be fixed by proclamation.
sec.3 Dictionary
sec.3 Dictionary
The dictionary in the schedule defines particular words used in this Act.
sec.4 Meaning of expressions used in Commonwealth Act
sec.4 Meaning of expressions used in Commonwealth Act
Unless the contrary intention appears, a word or expression used in this Act that is not defined in this Act has the meaning given by the Commonwealth Act .
sec.5 Objective
sec.5 Objective
The main objective of this Act is to enable the use by the police service and the CCC of telecommunications interception as a tool for the investigation of serious offences.
The main objective is to be achieved by establishing a recording, reporting and inspection regime required under the Commonwealth Act for the Commonwealth Minister to be able to declare the police service and the CCC to be agencies under the Commonwealth Act .
s 5 amd 2014 No. 21 s 94 (2) sch 2
(sec.5-ssec.1) The main objective of this Act is to enable the use by the police service and the CCC of telecommunications interception as a tool for the investigation of serious offences.
(sec.5-ssec.2) The main objective is to be achieved by establishing a recording, reporting and inspection regime required under the Commonwealth Act for the Commonwealth Minister to be able to declare the police service and the CCC to be agencies under the Commonwealth Act .
pt.2 Notification to and appearance of PIM
Notification to and appearance of PIM
sec.6 Application of pt 2
sec.6 Application of pt 2
This part applies if an officer of an eligible authority intends to make—
an application for a part 2-5 warrant under the Commonwealth Act , section 39 (a part 2-5 warrant application ); or
an application for an international production order under the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 22 (an IPO (investigative) application ); or
an application for an international production order under the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 52 (an IPO (supervisory) application ).
s 6 sub 2023 No. 1 s 83
(a) an application for a part 2-5 warrant under the Commonwealth Act , section 39 (a part 2-5 warrant application ); or
Operationally, the Act reallocates decision and information flows. Officers seeking a part 2-5 warrant or an international production order must notify and disclose to the PIM under arrangements the PIM decides, and must fully disclose matters both favourable and adverse to the application (ss 6-9). The PIM is empowered to appear and test applications (s 10). The chief officer must maintain particular records, inclusive of approvals, appointments, warrants, notifications to Commonwealth departments, certificates and authorisations (s 14), and must keep running logs of use, disclosure and handling of restricted records (s 15). The inspecting entity must inspect, at least twice yearly after the initial inspection year, and report deficiencies and remedial actions to the Minister (ss 22-24). The Act also creates criminal penalties for unauthorised disclosures or obstructing inspections (ss 34-35), limits application of the Judicial Review Act to decisions under this Act (s 38), and excludes parts 2-4 and s 31 from the Public Records Act 2023 (s 39).
Taken together, the mechanical consequence is a layered compliance regime: notification and adversarial testing at the application stage (Pt 2), detailed internal record-keeping and destruction controls for interception-derived material (Pt 3), and an independent inspection and reporting mechanism to the Minister and to the Commonwealth (Pt 4). The Act uses cross-references to transfer some operational control to the PIM and the inspecting entity, and to require co-ordination with Commonwealth processes (for example the need for written notice from the Commonwealth department before destruction of certain restricted records, s 20).
Main concepts
Eligible authority and eligible officer, part 2-5 warrants and IPOs, PIM and inspecting entity form the Act’s core vocabulary. The Act does not attempt to replicate the Commonwealth interception regime; rather, it defines state procedural obligations that enable state bodies to be declared agencies under the Commonwealth Act.
Eligible authority: the Act repeatedly refers to an eligible authority without enumerating its membership in the text provided. The stated objective (s 5) identifies the police service and the CCC as the intended users of telecommunications interception, so the obligations in Pt 3 and Pt 4 apply to the chief officer of an eligible authority and to officers of such authorities (for example ss 14-16, 18-20, 22-27). The Act imports from the Commonwealth Act meanings of unspecified expressions (s 4), so the term eligible authority should be read in that statutory context if a different instrument defines it.
PIM (person in monitoring role): Part 2 imposes procedural duties relating to notification and appearance of the PIM. An officer intending to apply for a part 2-5 warrant or for an international production order must notify the PIM under arrangements decided by the PIM, provide copies of written applications and accompanying affidavits or the information required on telephone applications, and fully disclose matters both favourable and adverse to the application (ss 6-9). The PIM is entitled to appear, ask questions and make submissions when the application is heard (s 10). Confidentiality obligations that might otherwise prevent disclosure do not apply to the disclosure under Pt 2 (s 11).
Part 2-5 warrants and IPOs: the Act is tightly cross-referenced to the Commonwealth Act. Sections 6-10 specify that the Act applies where an officer intends to make an application for a part 2-5 warrant (Commonwealth Act, s 39) or for international production orders in the Commonwealth Act (schedule 1, cl 22 or cl 52). The Act prescribes the operational interface between state officers and the PIM in those circumstances (s 7-10).
Record-keeping and restricted records: Part 3 places specific documentary obligations on the chief officer of the eligible authority. The chief officer must ensure the authority’s part 2-5 warrant records include approvals and appointments related to exercising part 2-5 authority, copies of warrants and related documents supplied by the PIM, notifications to the Commonwealth, revocation instruments, certificates and authorisations (s 14). Section 15 requires written recording of telephone applications, outcomes, details of each interception (start, duration, operator, services intercepted for named person warrants), uses of intercepted information, communications to people outside the authority, and occasions when intercepted information was given in evidence. Restricted records must be kept securely (s 18), destroyed when not required for a permitted purpose (s 19), but not destroyed until inspected by the Commonwealth Minister and the eligible authority’s inspecting entity is given opportunity to inspect (s 20).
Inspecting entity and inspection powers: Pt 4 makes the inspecting entity responsible for inspecting part 2-5 warrant records to ascertain compliance with ss 14-16 and 18-20, reporting to the Minister, and exercising powers necessary for those functions (s 22). The inspecting entity must inspect at least once in the initial relevant financial year and at least twice in later financial years (s 23). It may enter premises after notice, have full access to records, make copies and require officers to give relevant information (s 26). It can compel attendance and signed statements from officers (s 27). The Act removes legal excuses for not providing the information on grounds of other laws, public interest or self-incrimination, but provides limited protection against admissibility of compelled answers other than for prosecutions under s 35 (s 28). The inspecting entity may share information with other inspecting entities and, in limited circumstances, with the Commonwealth ombudsman (ss 29-30).
Confidentiality and offences: The Act forbids unauthorised disclosure of information obtained in administering this Act unless disclosure is permitted under specified heads, with a maximum penalty of 100 penalty units or two years imprisonment (s 34). Obstruction and refusal to comply with inspection requirements attract lower penalties (s 35). The Act also grants protection from civil liability for PIMs, deputy PIMs, parliamentary commissioner officers and legal practitioners acting honestly and without negligence, with liability shifting to the State if applicable (s 37).
Interplay concepts: s 4 imports Commonwealth Act meanings; ss 16-17 require reports be given to the State Minister and then forwarded to the Commonwealth Minister; s 20 requires written notice from the secretary of the Commonwealth department before destruction of restricted records; s 31 requires copies of inspecting entity reports be provided to the Commonwealth Minister. The Act excludes specified activities and records from the operation of the Public Records Act 2023 (s 39). The Judicial Review Act 1991 is excluded from decisions under this Act except for ss 41-42 of that Act (s 38).
Who it affects
The Act allocates duties and powers between several institutional actors, each bearing distinct compliance costs and decision rights.
Eligible authorities and their chief officers: Primary compliance costs fall on the chief officer of each eligible authority. The chief officer must cause specific documents and records to be kept as part of the authority’s part 2-5 warrant records (s 14), ensure detailed contemporaneous recording of warrant applications, interceptions, restricted records handling, and uses of intercepted information (s 15), and give reports to the State Minister (s 16). The chief officer must ensure restricted records are stored securely and destroyed only after specified steps have occurred (ss 18-20). The chief officer is also obliged to ensure officers assist inspecting entities (s 26). Noncompliance can be reported by the PIM or the inspecting entity to the Minister (ss 12, 24-25). The chief officer therefore bears administrative burdens (staff time, storage, audit-trails, secure facilities) and potential reputational and managerial costs if deficiencies are reported.
Officers of eligible authorities: Officers who make applications for part 2-5 warrants or IPOs must notify and provide documents to the PIM, and must fully disclose matters both favourable and adverse to the issuing of the warrant or order (ss 7-9). Officers who are required to assist an inspection must provide information, attend if required and answer questions (ss 26-27); refusal without reasonable excuse can attract prosecution under s 35. The Act removes other law defences to providing such information but protects compelled answers from admission in evidence in most prosecutions (s 28). Officers therefore face both disclosure obligations and potential criminal liability for obstruction or false statements.
PIM and deputy PIMs: The PIM is given a central gatekeeper and adversarial testing role in Part 2: being notified of applications, receiving copies of applications and affidavits or required telephone information, receiving full disclosure, appearing in hearings, making submissions and questioning persons (ss 7-10). The PIM decides the arrangements for notification (s 7(1)). Section 13 clarifies that PIMs’ functions under other appointment Acts do not apply for the purposes of this Act and that the PIM and deputy PIMs have only the functions or powers conferred by this Act. The PIM can delegate many powers to deputy PIMs, subject to limits, and must not delegate the power to report to the Minister (s 33). The PIM and deputy PIMs receive statutory protections from civil liability when acting honestly and without negligence (s 37). The PIM thus bears statutory responsibilities and corresponding institutional authority but is also insulated from some legal exposure.
Inspecting entity: The inspecting entity must conduct inspections at specified frequencies (s 23), report to the Minister (s 24), and may inspect at other times (s 23(3)). It has coercive powers to enter premises, require documents and testimony, make copies and share inspection information as authorised (ss 26-29). The inspecting entity’s findings must be passed to the Minister and to the chief officer, and, depending on the eligible authority, to the parliamentary committee or Police Minister (s 24(4)). The inspecting entity can report contraventions found during inspections, but must give the chief officer an opportunity to comment before reporting (s 25). The inspecting entity thus has investigatory authority and a reporting channel that can trigger further administrative or political responses.
State Minister and Commonwealth Minister: The State Minister receives reports from chief officers when warrants cease to be in force and annual reports derived from Commonwealth reporting requirements (s 16), receives inspection reports from the inspecting entity (s 24), and must forward copies of those inspection reports to the Commonwealth Minister (s 31). The Commonwealth Minister has a role in inspecting entries in the Commonwealth general register and must provide written notice via the secretary of the Commonwealth department before certain restricted records are destroyed (s 20). The Commonwealth Minister also determines whether the state authority may be declared an agency under the Commonwealth Act, the outcome subject to the state’s compliance with the recording and inspection regime the Commonwealth requires (s 5). Thus ministers at both levels are implicated in oversight and intergovernmental co-ordination.
Parliamentary commissioner, parliamentary committee and Police Minister: Where the eligible authority is the CCC, certain reports must be sent to the parliamentary commissioner and parliamentary committee (s 12(3), s 24(4)). Where the eligible authority is the police service, some reports go to the Police Minister (ss 12(3), 24(4)). The parliamentary commissioner may delegate powers to a legal practitioner engaged by the Speaker (s 32).
Persons asked to produce documents or answer questions during inspections: Section 11 removes secrecy obligations that might otherwise stop persons from disclosing information when questioned by the PIM in relation to a Pt 2 application. Section 28 similarly removes other law excuses for failing to provide information during inspections, while limiting admissibility of compelled answers. Employees and contractors of the eligible authority will therefore be required to cooperate, subject to limited protections in evidence, and can face criminal penalties for obstruction or false statements (s 35).
Persons who receive or handle intercepted material more broadly: The Act constrains disclosure of material obtained while administering it, subject to limited exceptions, and imposes a significant maximum penalty for unauthorised disclosure (s 34). This affects anyone who, in the course of administration, obtains such information, including external legal practitioners who may be engaged to advise, and contractors operating secure storage or IT systems.
In short, the Act places record-keeping and reporting burdens on chief officers, disclosure and cooperation duties on front-line officers, investigatory and reporting powers in the inspecting entity and PIM, and supervisory roles for State and Commonwealth ministers and parliamentary oversight bodies. The Act’s cross-references to Commonwealth provisions mean that eligible authorities must align state-level practices with Commonwealth requirements.
Key duties and rights
This Act imposes defined duties on officers and chief officers, and confers rights on the PIM, deputy PIMs and the inspecting entity. The duties are primarily procedural and documentary; rights are investigatory and participatory.
Notification and full disclosure duties: An officer intending to apply for a part 2-5 warrant or an international production order must notify the PIM under arrangements set by the PIM, and must provide written copies of applications and accompanying affidavits where the application is in writing (s 7(2)). For telephone applications the officer must give the PIM the information required by the Commonwealth Act for telephone applications (s 7(3)). The officer must disclose all matters known to the officer that are both favourable and adverse to issuing the warrant or order (s 8). The officer must provide any further information required to be given to the eligible Judge or nominated Australian Review Tribunal (ART) member in connection with the application (s 9). These duties shift part of the pre-application information flow to a PIM-controlled procedure.
PIM rights at hearing: The PIM is entitled to appear at the hearing of the application, make submissions to the eligible Judge or nominated ART member and question persons as provided in the Commonwealth Act equivalents (s 10). After the hearing the PIM must return documents provided by the officer under ss 7-9 where those documents relate to the application (s 10(2)). The PIM therefore has a statutory right to test applications and access records during the application process.
Record-keeping duties of the chief officer: The chief officer must ensure the authority keeps a defined set of documents in its part 2-5 warrant records, including approvals to exercise part 2-5 authority, appointments of approving and authorising officers, each part 2-5 warrant, copies of documents supplied by the PIM (excluding those mentioned in s 10(2)), notifications to the Commonwealth department, instruments revoking warrants, certificates issued under the Commonwealth Act and authorisations (s 14). The chief officer must also cause specified particulars to be recorded in writing, including particulars of telephone applications, whether applications were withdrawn or refused, whether warrants were issued, particulars of each interception (start, duration, operator), particulars relating to restricted records while in possession, particulars of each use of lawfully intercepted information, communications of intercepted information to persons outside the authority, and occasions when intercepted information was given in evidence (s 15). These are prescriptive documentary duties with time requirements (records must be made as soon as practicable after events, s 15(2)).
Secure storage and destruction duties: The chief officer must ensure restricted records are kept securely and not accessible except to entitled persons (s 18). Restricted records that are no longer likely to be required for a permitted purpose must be destroyed immediately, subject to exclusions and the procedures in s 20 (s 19). A permitted purpose expressly excludes an inspection of the kind mentioned in s 22(1)(a) or a report on such an inspection (s 19(2)). Section 20 requires written notice from the secretary of the Commonwealth department that the relevant general register entry has been inspected by the Commonwealth Minister before the chief officer may destroy the restricted record, and requires the chief officer to notify the eligible authority’s inspecting entity and give that entity an opportunity to inspect before destruction (s 20).
Reporting duties to State and Commonwealth Ministers: Within three months after a part 2-5 warrant issued to the authority stops being in force, the chief officer must give the Minister a written report about use made of intercepted information and communications of that information to persons other than officers of the authority (s 16(1)(a)). The chief officer must also provide, as soon as practicable and within three months after each 30 June, a written report setting out the information that Part 2-8 Division 2 of the Commonwealth Act requires for the Commonwealth Minister’s annual report and that can be derived from the authority’s part 2-5 warrant records (s 16(1)(b)). The State Minister must give the Commonwealth Minister a copy of such reports as soon as practicable (s 17).
Inspecting entity duties and powers: The inspecting entity must inspect the eligible authority’s part 2-5 warrant records to ascertain compliance with ss 14-16 and 18-20 (s 22(1)(a)), must report in writing to the Minister about inspection results (s 22(1)(b)), and may do anything necessary or convenient to perform those functions (s 22(1)(c)). It must inspect at least once in the initial year and at least twice each subsequent financial year, and may inspect at any time (s 23). The inspecting entity has statutory powers to enter premises after notifying the chief officer, to have full access to records, to copy and extract, and to require officers to give information (s 26). It can also require officers to provide signed written information or to attend and answer questions (s 27). It must comply with Commonwealth secrecy obligations in s 63 of the Commonwealth Act when reporting (s 24(3)).
Limits on secrecy and evidentiary protection: Section 11 disapplies obligations to maintain secrecy that would otherwise restrict disclosure or production of documents under Pt 2 for officers and persons questioned by the PIM. Section 28 removes excuses under other laws for refusing to give information, but declares that compelled information and derivative material is not admissible in evidence against the person who provided it, other than in a prosecution for an offence under s 35. Section 34, conversely, imposes a strict general confidentiality obligation on persons engaged in administration of this Act, with specified permitted disclosure heads and a high maximum penalty (100 penalty units or two years imprisonment), and includes cross-references to the Commonwealth Act provisions on intercepted information and warrant information.
Delegation and reporting constraints: The PIM may delegate powers to deputy PIMs except the power to report to the Minister (s 33). The parliamentary commissioner may delegate powers to a legal practitioner engaged by the Speaker (s 32). Delegates must produce instruments on request (ss 32-33).
Enforcement duties and penalties: The Act criminalises refusal to attend, provide information or answer questions when required under s 27 without reasonable excuse, and wilful obstruction or provision of false or misleading information to the inspecting entity (s 35). The Act also prescribes how proceedings are to be commenced and time limits (s 36). The inspecting entity may include reports of contraventions found during inspections, but must offer the chief officer an opportunity to comment (s 25).
Finally, the Act provides protections from civil liability for the PIM, deputy PIMs, parliamentary commissioner officers and certain legal practitioners when acting honestly and without negligence, and prevents such persons from being called to give evidence about matters that come to their knowledge while performing functions under the Act (s 37).
Penalties and enforcement
The Act contains a mixture of criminal penalties targeted at information-handling and obstruction, and administrative enforcement via inspection reports and ministerial referrals.
Primary criminal penalties: The highest penalty is reserved for unauthorised disclosure of information obtained by a person engaged in the administration of the Act, subject only to specified permitted disclosure channels. Section 34(1) makes it an offence to disclose information or records obtained because of engagement in administration of this Act, unless the disclosure is under the Commonwealth Act, for the discharge of the person’s functions under this Act, to the PIM, or to an inspecting entity for inspection purposes. The maximum penalty is 100 penalty units or two years imprisonment. Section 34 cross-references Commonwealth Act provisions on intercepted information and warrant information (s 63, s 105, and schedule 1 cl 152), highlighting that the state offence operates alongside Commonwealth secrecy rules.
Inspection-related offences: Section 35 criminalises, without reasonable excuse, refusal or failure to attend when required under s 27, to give information or to answer a question. It also criminalises wilful obstruction of a person carrying out inspecting functions and giving information known to be false or misleading in a material particular to the inspecting entity. The maximum penalty for these offences is 20 penalty units or six months imprisonment. A complaint for a false or misleading information offence may state simply that the information was false or misleading without specifying which particulars (s 35(3)).
Proceedings and time limits: Proceedings under this Act must be taken summarily under the Justices Act 1886 (s 36(1)). Time to commence a proceeding is limited to 1 year after the offence, or 1 year after the offence comes to the complainant’s knowledge, provided the latter is within 2 years of the offence being committed (s 36(2)). These limits constrain long-tail prosecutions and reinforce the summary enforcement model.
Administrative enforcement: The Act empowers the inspecting entity to report deficiencies identified in inspections to the Minister, to include particulars of remedial action taken or proposed, and to report contraventions of the Commonwealth Act or of ss 16 or 20 of this Act if, after providing the chief officer with an opportunity to comment, the inspecting entity considers a contravention has occurred (ss 24-25). The PIM may report noncompliance by an eligible authority to the Minister, subject to limitations about content where Commonwealth secrecy provisions apply (s 12). Reports are circulated to other oversight recipients, such as the parliamentary commissioner and parliamentary committee in relation to the CCC or the Police Minister in relation to the police service (s 12(3), s 24(4)). Administrative exposure can therefore lead to political or oversight scrutiny, separate from criminal prosecution.
Admissibility and compelled evidence protections: The Act limits admissibility of compelled information obtained during inspections: compelled answers and documents given under the inspection powers, and any information obtained as an indirect consequence, are not admissible in evidence against the person who provided them, other than in a prosecution for an offence under s 35 (s 28(2)). This creates a narrow carve-out to encourage cooperation while preserving ability to prosecute obstruction or false statements.
Civil liability and testimony protections: Section 37 protects the PIM, deputy PIMs, parliamentary commissioner officers and authorised legal practitioners from civil liability for acts or omissions done honestly and without negligence in the administration of this Act; liability then attaches to the State. Those persons may not be called to give evidence or produce documents in judicial proceedings in relation to matters that came to their knowledge while performing functions under this Act (s 37(4)). This reduces the likelihood of civil suits against those officeholders for routine exercise of functions, and shields inspection and oversight communications from later discovery in litigation.
Relationship with Commonwealth secrecy offences: The Act expressly cross-references the Commonwealth Act’s provisions (for example s 63 on no dealing with intercepted information) and declares that a contravention of a condition or restriction specified in a warrant is a contravention of a provision of the Commonwealth Act (s 25(3)). The state offence in s 34 is not framed as displacing Commonwealth offences; instead, the Act signals overlap and parallel enforcement pathways.
Enforcement pathway calibration: Practically, the enforcement architecture combines criminal penalties targeted at disclosure and obstruction, administrative reporting that triggers ministerial and parliamentary oversight, and immunity protections designed to preserve inspecting entity and PIM operations. The inspection function, by design, is a primary mechanism for detecting deficiencies and contraventions, which then flow into ministerial reporting and potential administrative consequences; criminal enforcement is available but constrained by summary procedures and time limits (s 36).
How it interacts with other laws
The Act is drafted as an adjunct to the Commonwealth telecommunications interception regime and as a partial exception to some state-level statutes. Its text repeatedly cross-references the Commonwealth Act and imports its meanings. It also carves out application of the Public Records Act 2023 and limits application of the Judicial Review Act 1991 to decisions under this Act.
Importation of Commonwealth meanings: Section 4 provides that, unless there is a contrary intention, a word or expression used in this Act which is not defined in this Act has the meaning given by the Commonwealth Act. Multiple operational provisions direct officers to provide material or act in accordance with the requirements of the Commonwealth Act (for example ss 6-10 reference Commonwealth Act sections for telephone and written applications, ss 14-15 require keeping documents and certificates that the Commonwealth Act contemplates). This means the Act relies on the Commonwealth Act for definitions of key concepts like part 2-5 warrants, eligible judges, and authorised procedural forms.
Co-ordination with Commonwealth inspection and register processes: Section 20 requires the chief officer to refrain from destroying a restricted record under s 19 unless there is written notice from the secretary of the Commonwealth department that the entry in the Commonwealth general register relating to the warrant has been inspected by the Commonwealth Minister, and unless the inspecting entity has been given the opportunity to inspect the restricted record. Section 16(1)(b) requires the chief officer’s annual report to set out elements that Part 2-8 Division 2 of the Commonwealth Act requires of the Commonwealth Minister’s annual report. Section 31 requires copies of inspecting entity reports to be forwarded to the Commonwealth Minister. Together, these provisions create an explicit interlocking administrative regime with the Commonwealth Minister and Commonwealth departmental register and inspection processes.
Secrecy and admissibility interplay: The Act carefully negotiates the tensions between inspection powers and secrecy obligations. Section 11 disapplies obligations of secrecy or restrictions on disclosure that might otherwise prevent officers or a person questioned by the PIM from producing documents or giving information under Pt 2. Section 28 disapplies other law excuses for inspection compliance, but also provides that compelled answers and derivative information are not admissible against the person who provided them, except for prosecutions under s 35. Section 34, however, imposes a state offence of unauthorised disclosure, and cross-references Commonwealth secrecy provisions (s 63, s 105, schedule 1 cl 152). The net effect is a constrained disclosure regime: compelled internal disclosures for inspection are required and largely insulated from use in prosecutions against those who comply, but unauthorised external disclosures remain subject to harsh state penalties and Commonwealth secrecy rules.
Exclusion from the Public Records Act 2023: Section 39 expressly states that the Public Records Act 2023 does not apply to an activity or a record under Parts 2 to 4 or s 31. This exclusion prevents state freedom-of-information style archival or public- records processes from applying to these records and activities, which affects long-term record retention, access by the public, and statutory archives handling.
Limitation on judicial review: Section 38 provides that the Judicial Review Act 1991 does not apply to decisions made, or purportedly made, under this Act. The subsection qualifies that ss 41 and 42 of the Judicial Review Act 1991 are unaffected. The Act therefore constrains merits or certain forms of administrative review available under the Judicial Review Act for decisions made under this regime, subject to the Judicial Review Act’s own exceptions.
Interaction with other state appointment Acts: Section 13 clarifies that, although appointment provisions in the Police Powers and Responsibilities Act 2000 and the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 provide for appointment of a PIM and deputy PIMs, the functions and powers under those appointment Acts do not apply for the purposes of this Act; instead the PIM and deputy PIM have the functions and powers conferred by this Act. This overrides cross-application of other appointment-based powers and centralises the Act’s functions.
Evidence and criminal law interplay: Section 28(2) bars admissibility of compelled answers and derivative information in evidence against the person who provided them except in prosecutions under s 35. Section 34 creates a separate state offence for unauthorised disclosure with serious penalties. Section 25 declares that contravention of a warrant condition is a contravention of the Commonwealth Act, which creates exposure under Commonwealth law as well as state reporting consequences. The net effect is that the Act structures an evidentiary carve-out protecting compelled cooperation in inspections and pre-application testing, while preserving avenues for prosecution of obstruction, false statements and unauthorised disclosures.
Delegation and legal practitioner engagement: Section 32 permits the parliamentary commissioner to delegate powers to a legal practitioner engaged by the Speaker under the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 s 315(2). Section 33 allows the PIM to delegate powers to deputy PIMs other than the power to report to the Minister. Delegates must produce instruments on request. These provisions create interfaces with other legislation that authorises engagement of legal practitioners and with internal delegation practices.
In sum, the Act operates as a state overlay to the Commonwealth telecommunications interception regime, importing Commonwealth meanings and synchronising certain procedural and record-keeping requirements while creating state-level inspection, secrecy and reporting processes. It deliberately narrows the application of certain state transparency and review mechanisms to preserve the confidentiality and operational integrity of interception activities, and it links state destruction controls to Commonwealth inspection of registry entries.
Amendment history
The version of the Act provided includes internal amendment annotations that identify specific amendments and insertion dates. The Act has been modified repeatedly since enactment; the text supplied notes amendments in particular sections across multiple years. The following lists amendments shown in the text and the provisions they affected, using the annotations in the Act.
2014 amendments:
s 5 was amended, with an annotation s 5 amd 2014 No. 21 s 94(2) sch 2, indicating changes to the statement of the main objective (s 5).
s 12 and s 13 carry the same 2014 amendment annotation (s 94(2) sch 2); s 32 was similarly amended (s 32 amd 2014 No. 21 s 94(2) sch 2). Section 24 also records an amendment annotation referencing 2014 No. 21 s 94(2) sch 2.
2017 amendments:
s 14 shows an amendment annotation s 14 amd 2017 No. 6 s 74, indicating changes to the record-keeping duties for eligible authorities.
2023 amendments (multiple changes referenced as 2023 No. 1):
Significant reworking of Part 2 provisions is apparent from repeated 2023 annotations: s 6 was substituted (s 6 sub 2023 No. 1 s 83), and ss 7-13 show amendments annotated s 7 amd 2023 No. 1 s 84, s 8 amd 2023 No. 1 s 85, s 9 sub 2023 No. 1 s 86, s 10 amd 2023 No. 1 s 87, s 11 amd 2023 No. 1 s 88, s 12 amended with 2023 No. 1 s 89. The amendments appear to reframe notification, disclosure and PIM processes, and to add reporting and inspection linkages. Section 14 was amended by the 2023 instrument (s 14 amd 2023 No. 1 s 97 sch 1 pt 1), and s 15 was similarly amended (s 15 amd 2023 No. 1 s 97 sch 1 pt 1). Sections 16, 20, 22-29 and 24-27 all carry 2023 No. 1 s 97 sch 1 pt 1 annotations, indicating comprehensive updates to record-keeping, inspection powers and reporting duties. Section 31 was not explicitly annotated, but other reporting sections were. Section 39 was amended in 2023 by a separate instrument (s 39 amd 2023 No. 33 s 107 sch 5).
2024 amendments:
Two 2024 annotations appear in the provided text: s 9 was further amended in 2024 (s 9 amd 2024 No. 47 s 78 sch 2), and s 15 carries a 2024 amendment annotation (s 15 amd 2024 No. 47 s 78 sch 2). Section 25 also records a 2024 No. 41 s 60 insertion (s 25 amd 2024 No. 41 s 60), and s 29 a 2024 No. 41 s 61 change. These suggest fine-tuning of inspection and reporting provisions in 2024.
Transitional insertion:
Section 41 was inserted by 2023 No. 1 s 93, creating a transitional provision dealing with existing part 2-5 warrant applications where an application was made but not decided before commencement of an amendment.
Formal delegation and confidentiality changes:
Section 32 (delegation by parliamentary commissioner) records the 2014 change noted above. Section 34 (general confidentiality provision) records a 2023 amendment s 92.
Annotation semantics and limitations:
The Act text uses the conventional legislative annotation style to indicate which amending Act and which section of that Act made changes (for example, "2023 No. 1 s 97 sch 1 pt 1" denotes amendment by Act number 1 of 2023, section 97, schedule 1 part 1). The supplied text does not include the amending Acts themselves, their full titles or the explanatory memoranda that accompanied them; it only includes the internal notations identifying the amending instruments and the sections affected. The annotations show concentrated amendment activity in 2023 with follow-up redrafting in 2024 and some earlier amendments in 2014 and 2017.
Functional inference from amendment pattern:
The cluster of 2023 amendments across Pt 2, Pt 3 and Pt 4 suggests a substantial legislative reform of the state-level interface with the Commonwealth interception regime in that year, touching on notification arrangements, inspection and reporting regimes, and record-keeping. The 2024 annotations indicate further adjustments, likely to clarify or align operational detail. However, the text supplied does not include amendment explanatory materials, so it is not possible to cite legislative intent beyond the Act’s existing stated objective (s 5) or to describe the policy drivers beyond what the notations imply.
Users should therefore treat the amendment annotations as a map of recent legislative activity affecting this Act and should consult the amending Acts and legislative history for authoritative explanatory detail when preparing formal compliance or advice materials.
Litigation history
The Act text supplied does not reference any court decisions, judicial interpretations, or litigation history. There are no cases, judicial orders, or citations listed in the statutory provisions as provided. Section 37 provides procedural protections for certain office-holders in relation to being called as witnesses in court, and section 38 limits the application of the Judicial Review Act 1991 to decisions made under this Act, but these are internal procedural rules rather than references to litigation outcomes.
Practical implications of the absence of litigation references in the text provided:
Because the Act as supplied contains no reported cases or judicial gloss, statutory meaning and operational practices will primarily be shaped by the statutory text, by any Commonwealth Act provisions that are incorporated by reference, and by future administrative practice or judicial review proceedings. Section 38 explicitly limits the availability of the Judicial Review Act to decisions made under this Act, except for ss 41-42 of the Judicial Review Act, which remain available; that will shape litigants’ choice of remedies and the potential for judicial development of the Act’s meaning. The existence of that limitation underscores that, should disputes arise, litigation may need to proceed under other statutory or common law mechanisms rather than under the Judicial Review Act’s default model, but the supplied text does not detail those avenues.
Recommended next steps for practitioners seeking litigation history:
Consult court databases and authorised legislative histories for the relevant state jurisdiction and perform targeted searches for judicial consideration of the Act, its interaction with the Commonwealth Act, and disputes over inspection powers, secrecy obligations or application-stage PIM interventions. Because the supplied text shows substantial amendments in 2023 and 2024, practitioners should check for subsequent decisions that interpret the amended provisions. The Act’s internal cross-references to Commonwealth provisions mean litigation addressing the Commonwealth interception regime may also have relevance to interpretation and application of this Act.
Gotchas
The Act contains numerous operational traps or counterintuitive rules that practitioners and compliance officers should flag.
PIM-controlled notification arrangements: Section 7(1) provides that the officer must notify the PIM of the application "under arrangements decided by the PIM." That vests the PIM with the procedural power to set notification processes. Practically, this means state officers must accommodate PIM-chosen timelines and formats; failing to follow the PIM’s arrangements could be treated as noncompliance even if officers otherwise comply with the statutory content requirements in s 7(2)-(3).
Full disclosure duty includes adverse matters: Section 8 requires the officer to "fully disclose to the PIM all matters of which the officer is aware, both favourable and adverse" to the issuing of the warrant or IPO. This is broader than typical internal briefings and creates an express statutory duty to surface exculpatory or undermining information at the pre-application stage to the PIM.
Destruction of restricted records requires Commonwealth and inspecting entity steps: Under s 19, restricted records must be destroyed when no longer required for a permitted purpose, but s 20 prevents destruction until the chief officer has received written notice from the Commonwealth department secretary that the general register entry has been inspected by the Commonwealth Minister, and until the eligible authority’s inspecting entity is notified and given an opportunity to inspect. In practice, that creates an intergovernmental sequential step before destruction, which may introduce storage costs and delay disposal of sensitive material.
Public Records Act exclusion: Section 39 excludes activities and records under Parts 2-4 and s 31 from the operation of the Public Records Act 2023. That prevents normal archival and public-records access processes from applying, which affects long-term retention policies and archival oversight. Organisations must not assume normal public-records rules apply.
Limited judicial review: Section 38 excludes the Judicial Review Act 1991 from decisions under this Act, save for ss 41-42 of the Judicial Review Act. This narrows routes for administrative challenge and may push affected persons to alternate remedies; practitioners should not assume Judicial Review Act procedures are available for review of PIM or inspecting entity decisions.
Secrecy vs compelled disclosure tension: Section 11 disapplies secrecy obligations to permit disclosure under Pt 2, while s 28 disapplies other law excuses for inspection compliance. At the same time, s 34 prohibits unauthorised disclosure with a high penalty. The practical boundary between permitted internal disclosures to the PIM or inspecting entity and unauthorised external disclosure is strict, and accidental public disclosure could attract severe penalties.
Evidence exclusion for compelled answers: Section 28(2) rules compelled answers and derivative information inadmissible in evidence against the person who provided them, except for offences under s 35. This is protective for officers, but it also limits the value of compelled information for prosecutions unrelated to inspection obstruction. Prosecutors must plan evidence strategies accordingly.
Delegation and production of instruments: Sections 32-33 authorise delegation by the parliamentary commissioner and the PIM. Delegates must produce the instrument of delegation on request. A failure to provide such instruments when challenged could lead to procedural fights about authority, so agencies must keep delegation instruments organised and accessible.
Tight timelines for reporting and proceedings: Section 16 requires written reports within three months of a warrant ceasing, and within three months after each 30 June for annual summaries. Section 36 imposes short time-limits for commencing summary proceedings (generally 1 year). Compressed administrative and enforcement timelines create operational deadlines agencies must meet.
Cross-references to the Commonwealth Act: Many obligations are framed by reference to the Commonwealth Act (s 4 and numerous cross-references throughout). If the Commonwealth Act is amended, or if the state authority’s status under the Commonwealth Act changes, state duties and processes will shift. Practitioners must monitor Commonwealth material to ensure state compliance remains aligned.
Confidentiality exception for certain reports: Section 12 permits the PIM to give reports to the Minister about noncompliance, but requires such reports not to contain material prohibited by the Commonwealth Act from being included (for part 2-5 reports, Commonwealth Act s 63; for IPO reports, Commonwealth Act schedule 1 cl 152). This creates content constraints on inspector and PIM reporting.
Criminal penalties for inspectors’ false or misleading info allegations: Section 35(2)(b) criminalises knowingly false or misleading information to the inspecting entity, and allows complaints to be pleaded generally as "false or misleading." Investigators must keep robust records to resist overbroad allegations and agencies must train staff accordingly.
These “gotchas” flow directly from the statutory provisions and show reliance on inter-agency co-ordination, strict secrecy controls, and an inspector-centric compliance model. They emphasise the need for clear internal protocols, secure record systems, and timely interaction with PIMs and the Commonwealth department.
How to comply
Compliance requires systems, processes, and governance mapped to the Act’s documentary, notification, inspection and secrecy obligations. Below are practical, source-grounded steps an eligible authority should consider to demonstrate and sustain compliance.
Map obligations and create a statutory compliance checklist: Use ss 6-20 and ss 22-29 to build a checklist covering application-stage notification (Pt 2), required documents to be held in the authority’s part 2-5 warrant records (s 14), the detailed particulars that must be recorded (s 15), secure storage rules (s 18), destruction process (s 19-20), inspection frequency and reporting (ss 23-24), and inspection powers (ss 26-29). Ensure a named responsible officer is accountable for each statutory duty.
Establish PIM notification arrangements and standard operating procedures: Because s 7(1) allows the PIM to decide arrangements for notification, the eligible authority should promptly agree and document operational notification protocols with the PIM, specifying channels, timing, formats for written and telephone applications, and the process for providing affidavits or required telephone information (s 7(2)-(3)). Embed the full disclosure duty in pre-application checklists so officers provide both favourable and adverse matters as required by s 8.
Implement contemporaneous records capture systems: Section 15 requires written particulars of application telephone calls, outcomes, each interception (start, finish, operator), and uses and disclosures of intercepted information. Implement an electronic log or a secure database with timestamped entries and audit trails to capture necessary fields, with roles-based access control in compliance with s 18. Ensure telephone application details meet Commonwealth Act content requirements as referenced in s 7 and s 9.
Secure storage and restricted records handling: Establish secure physical and digital storage conforming to s 18 that limits access to entitled persons. Create procedures for marking restricted records, logging each occasion a restricted record is received, copied, supplied or destroyed, and for maintaining chain-of-custody records that can be inspected by the inspecting entity (s 15(d), s 18). Design destruction workflows that await written notice from the Commonwealth department secretary confirming inspection by the Commonwealth Minister and allow the inspecting entity an opportunity to inspect first (s 20).
Prepare reporting schedules and templates: Create templates for the reports required by s 16 (warrant cessation reports within three months and annual reports within three months after 30 June) and ensure the templates capture the elements the Commonwealth Act expects the Commonwealth Minister to report under Part 2-8 Division 2, as s 16(1)(b) requires. Assign responsibility for submission to the State Minister and for forwarding copies to the Commonwealth Minister per s 17 and s 31.
Prepare for regular inspections and ad hoc inspections: The inspecting entity must inspect at least twice each financial year after the initial year (s 23). Ensure premises access, ready capability to produce part 2-5 warrant records on request, procedures to make copies and extracts, and staff training to respond to requests under s 26 and s 27. Maintain a records index and make delegation instruments available on request, as required under ss 32-33.
Train officers on limits of secrecy and compelled disclosure: Develop targeted training so officers understand that secrecy obligations do not prevent disclosure under Pt 2 (s 11) and that other laws do not excuse failure to comply with inspection requirements (s 28). Simultaneously, instruct staff on the severe penalties for unauthorised external disclosures (s 34), and on the inadmissibility protections that apply to compelled answers (s 28(2)). Training should include scenario-based sessions covering PIM interactions, inspection demands and the destruction approval chain.
Documentation and delegation control: Maintain clear delegation instruments for approving officers and authorising officers as required by s 14(b), (h) and (i), and ensure those instruments are accessible for inspection or production under s 33(2). Keep a register of appointments and approvals that mirrors the statutory list in s 14.
Remedial action and deficiency tracking: Section 24 requires the inspecting entity to report deficiencies and remedial action. Eligible authorities should maintain an internal corrective-action register tied to inspection findings, with named action owners and completion timelines, so the chief officer can demonstrate prompt remedial steps when inspections find deficiencies.
Legal and intergovernmental liaison: Assign a legal or compliance officer to act as the interface with the PIM, the inspecting entity, the State Minister’s office and the Commonwealth department. This officer should manage the exchange of reports, ensure timely receipt of Commonwealth written notice required under s 20, and coordinate any information-sharing allowed under s 29 and s 30 (for cases involving Commonwealth agencies and the Commonwealth ombudsman).
Audit trail and retention policies: Although the Public Records Act 2023 is excluded for Parts 2-4 and s 31 (s 39), establish internally approved retention and disposal policies that reflect the destruction procedures in s 19-20. Ensure that "destroy immediately" obligations are implemented only after required notifications and opportunities to inspect have been satisfied.
Criminal exposure minimisation: Implement measures to avoid obstruction or false statements that attract s 35 penalties. Maintain witness statements, contemporaneous logs and IT records to defend against allegations of obstruction or falsehood. Where staff face demands to answer or provide documents, ensure requests are handled through trained compliance channels to avoid inadvertent noncompliance.
Policies on external disclosures and media: Given s 34’s high penalties, develop a strict external disclosure policy that requires legal sign-off before releasing any information that might be related to intercepted information, warrant information, inspection reports, or internal administration of the Act. Any permitted disclosures should be logged and the legal basis recorded.
Monitor amending instruments and Commonwealth developments: Because the Act imports the Commonwealth Act’s definitions and requires alignment with Commonwealth reporting and register inspections (s 4, s 16, s 20), maintain a watching brief on Commonwealth legislative and administrative changes. Update internal procedures when Commonwealth reporting elements or telephone application form requirements change.
Record the logic for "permitted purpose" determinations: Section 19 refers to "permitted purpose" and excludes inspection and inspection reporting purposes from constituting a permitted purpose for destruction timing. Maintain documented decision-making records showing why a restricted record is or is not likely to be required for a permitted purpose to justify destruction, including cross-checks against inspection timelines.
Adopting these measures will align operational practice with the Act’s principal documentary, notification, inspection and secrecy duties. The compliance burden is procedural and document-intensive, with significant intergovernmental coordination obligations that require designated points of contact and documented workflows.
(b) an application for an international production order under the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 22 (an IPO (investigative) application ); or
(c) an application for an international production order under the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 52 (an IPO (supervisory) application ).
sec.7 PIM must be notified
sec.7 PIM must be notified
The officer must notify the PIM of the application under arrangements decided by the PIM.
If the officer intends to make the application in writing, the officer must give the PIM—
a copy of the written application; and
a copy of the affidavit required to accompany the written application under—
for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 42 ; or
for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 25; or
for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 55.
If the officer intends to make the application by telephone, the officer must give the PIM the information required to be given on a telephone application under—
for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 43 ; or
for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 26; or
for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 56.
s 7 amd 2023 No. 1 s 84
(sec.7-ssec.1) The officer must notify the PIM of the application under arrangements decided by the PIM.
(sec.7-ssec.2) If the officer intends to make the application in writing, the officer must give the PIM— a copy of the written application; and a copy of the affidavit required to accompany the written application under— for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 42 ; or for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 25; or for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 55.
(sec.7-ssec.3) If the officer intends to make the application by telephone, the officer must give the PIM the information required to be given on a telephone application under— for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 43 ; or for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 26; or for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 56.
(a) a copy of the written application; and
(b) a copy of the affidavit required to accompany the written application under— (i) for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 42 ; or (ii) for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 25; or (iii) for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 55.
(i) for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 42 ; or
(ii) for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 25; or
(iii) for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 55.
(i) for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 42 ; or
(ii) for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 25; or
(iii) for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 55.
(a) for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 43 ; or
(b) for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 26; or
(c) for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 56.
sec.8 Full disclosure to PIM
sec.8 Full disclosure to PIM
The officer must also fully disclose to the PIM all matters of which the officer is aware, both favourable and adverse to the issuing of the part 2-5 warrant or international production order.
s 8 amd 2023 No. 1 s 85
sec.9 PIM to be given further information
sec.9 PIM to be given further information
The officer must also give the PIM any further information that is required to be given to the eligible Judge or nominated ART member in connection with the application under—
for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 44 ; or
for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 27; or
for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 57.
s 9 sub 2023 No. 1 s 86
amd 2024 No. 47 s 78 sch 2
(a) for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 44 ; or
(b) for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 27; or
(c) for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 57.
sec.10 PIM entitled to appear
sec.10 PIM entitled to appear
To test the validity of the application, the PIM is entitled to appear at the hearing of the application, make submissions to the eligible Judge or nominated ART member and question persons as provided under—
for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 45 ; or
for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 29; or
for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 59.
As soon as practicable after the application is heard, the PIM must return to the officer any documents given by the officer to the PIM under section 7 , 8 or 9 in relation to the application.
s 10 amd 2023 No. 1 s 87 ; 2024 No. 47 s 78 sch 2
(sec.10-ssec.1) To test the validity of the application, the PIM is entitled to appear at the hearing of the application, make submissions to the eligible Judge or nominated ART member and question persons as provided under— for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 45 ; or for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 29; or for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 59.
(sec.10-ssec.2) As soon as practicable after the application is heard, the PIM must return to the officer any documents given by the officer to the PIM under section 7 , 8 or 9 in relation to the application.
(a) for a part 2-5 warrant application—the Commonwealth Act , section 45 ; or
(b) for an IPO (investigative) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 29; or
(c) for an IPO (supervisory) application—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 59.
sec.11 Confidentiality obligations not to apply
sec.11 Confidentiality obligations not to apply
This section applies to—
an officer of an eligible authority; and
a person questioned by the PIM in relation to an application as mentioned in section 10 (1) .
An obligation to maintain secrecy in relation to, or that otherwise restricts, the disclosure of information or the production of documents in the possession of the person, whether imposed under an Act or by a rule of law, does not apply to the disclosure of information or the production of a document under this part.
s 11 amd 2023 No. 1 s 88
(sec.11-ssec.1) This section applies to— an officer of an eligible authority; and a person questioned by the PIM in relation to an application as mentioned in section 10 (1) .
(sec.11-ssec.2) An obligation to maintain secrecy in relation to, or that otherwise restricts, the disclosure of information or the production of documents in the possession of the person, whether imposed under an Act or by a rule of law, does not apply to the disclosure of information or the production of a document under this part.
(a) an officer of an eligible authority; and
(b) a person questioned by the PIM in relation to an application as mentioned in section 10 (1) .
sec.12 PIM to report to Minister about noncompliance
sec.12 PIM to report to Minister about noncompliance
Whenever the PIM considers it appropriate, the PIM may give the Minister a report on noncompliance by an eligible authority with this Act or the Commonwealth Act .
The report must not contain information mentioned in—
for a report relating to a part 2-5 warrant —the Commonwealth Act , section 63 ; or
for a report relating to an international production order—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 152.
The PIM must give a copy of the report to—
if the eligible authority is the CCC—the parliamentary commissioner and the parliamentary committee; or
if the eligible authority is the police service—the Police Minister.
s 12 amd 2014 No. 21 s 94 (2) sch 2 ; 2023 No. 1 s 89
(sec.12-ssec.1) Whenever the PIM considers it appropriate, the PIM may give the Minister a report on noncompliance by an eligible authority with this Act or the Commonwealth Act .
(sec.12-ssec.2) The report must not contain information mentioned in— for a report relating to a part 2-5 warrant —the Commonwealth Act , section 63 ; or for a report relating to an international production order—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 152.
(sec.12-ssec.3) The PIM must give a copy of the report to— if the eligible authority is the CCC—the parliamentary commissioner and the parliamentary committee; or if the eligible authority is the police service—the Police Minister.
(a) for a report relating to a part 2-5 warrant —the Commonwealth Act , section 63 ; or
(b) for a report relating to an international production order—the Commonwealth Act , schedule 1 , clause 152.
(a) if the eligible authority is the CCC—the parliamentary commissioner and the parliamentary committee; or
(b) if the eligible authority is the police service—the Police Minister.
sec.13 Relationship of provisions of other Acts to PIM and deputy PIMs
sec.13 Relationship of provisions of other Acts to PIM and deputy PIMs
The Police Powers and Responsibilities Act 2000 , section 740 and the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 , section 324 provide for the appointment of a PIM and 1 or more deputy PIMs (each an appointment provision of an appointment Act ).
However, despite the functions and powers of a PIM or deputy PIM mentioned in an appointment provision or any other provision of an appointment Act—
the functions and powers do not apply for the purposes of this Act; and
the PIM and deputy PIM have instead the functions or powers conferred by this Act.
s 13 amd 2014 No. 21 s 94 (2) sch 2
(sec.13-ssec.1) The Police Powers and Responsibilities Act 2000 , section 740 and the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 , section 324 provide for the appointment of a PIM and 1 or more deputy PIMs (each an appointment provision of an appointment Act ).
(sec.13-ssec.2) However, despite the functions and powers of a PIM or deputy PIM mentioned in an appointment provision or any other provision of an appointment Act— the functions and powers do not apply for the purposes of this Act; and the PIM and deputy PIM have instead the functions or powers conferred by this Act.
(a) the functions and powers do not apply for the purposes of this Act; and
(b) the PIM and deputy PIM have instead the functions or powers conferred by this Act.
pt.3 Record-keeping and related functions of eligible authorities relating to part 2-5 warrants
Record-keeping and related functions of eligible authorities relating to part 2-5 warrants
sec.14 Eligible authority to keep documents connected with issue of part 2-5 warrants
sec.14 Eligible authority to keep documents connected with issue of part 2-5 warrants
The chief officer of an eligible authority must cause the following to be kept in the authority’s part 2-5 warrant records—
each approval to exercise the authority conferred by part 2-5 warrants given under section 55 (3) of the Commonwealth Act ;
each appointment of an officer of the eligible authority to be an approving officer made under section 55 (4) of the Commonwealth Act ;
each part 2-5 warrant issued to the authority;
a copy of each document, other than a document mentioned in section 10 (2) , given by the PIM to an officer of the eligible authority under part 2 in relation to the issue of the part 2-5 warrant ;
a copy of each notification given to the secretary of the Commonwealth department under section 59A (2) of the Commonwealth Act ;
each instrument revoking a part 2-5 warrant ;
a copy of each certificate issued under section 61 (4) of the Commonwealth Act by a certifying officer of the authority;
each appointment of an officer of the eligible authority to be an authorising officer made under section 66 (4) of the Commonwealth Act ;
each authorisation by the chief officer, or an authorising officer of the eligible authority, given under section 66 (2) of the Commonwealth Act .
s 14 amd 2017 No. 6 s 74 ; 2023 No. 1 s 97 s ch 1 pt 1
(a) each approval to exercise the authority conferred by part 2-5 warrants given under section 55 (3) of the Commonwealth Act ;
(b) each appointment of an officer of the eligible authority to be an approving officer made under section 55 (4) of the Commonwealth
This is an opening excerpt, not the complete document.