Mechanically, these rules set the Procedure for Planning & Environment Court proceedings: how cases start, where and when documents must be filed and served, who appears, how hearings are listed, ADR and expert‑evidence processes, and access to filed documents. They state expert duties and joint‑expert meeting procedures (sch.1‑sec.1; r 28, r 28A). They matter because they allocate who pays (witness and copy/search fees), impose compliance deadlines, and give the court broad discretion to waive, direct or sanction procedural requirements (r 5), affecting litigants, experts and court officers.
These rules set out the procedural framework for proceedings in the Planning and Environment Court (the P&E Court). They govern how proceedings are started, where they are filed, the required contents of originating documents and applications, service and timing obligations, entries of appearance and elections to be a party, discontinuance and withdrawal procedures, how hearings are listed and conducted, the role and duties of expert witnesses, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes, and access to and copying of court files. See in particular rules about commencing proceedings (rr 6-12), entries of appearance and election to be a party (rr 14-15), discontinuance and withdrawal (rr 16-17), hearing location and urgent without-notice orders (rr 18-19), the court’s powers to make procedural orders and directions (r 20), expert evidence and meetings of experts (part 3, including rr 23-36, and the code in sch 1), ADR processes (part 5, rr 41-46), and copying and inspection of filed documents (rr 47A-47C).
Mechanically, the rules:
prescribe the form and minimum contents of originating processes and applications, including contact and address-for-service details (rr 9-11);
impose specific service windows and response times, commonly 10 business days for service or filing of entries of appearance and notices of election (rr 12, 14-15), and defined shorter windows for applications (rr 38-39; r 21);
require experts to prepare reports and, where ordered, attend meetings of experts and prepare joint reports under a code of conduct (rr 28, 33-35; sch 1);
empower ADR registrars and mediators to convene and chair case management conferences, without prejudice conferences and mediations where directed or requested by all parties (rr 26, 43-45A);
Current sections
Direct links to the current provisions in Planning and Environment Court Rules 2018.
95
pt.1
Preliminary
Preliminary
sec.1
Short title
sec.1 Short title
These rules may be cited as the Planning and Environment Court Rules 2018 .
sec.2
Commencement
sec.2 Commencement
These rules commence on 4 July 2018.
sec.3
Definitions
sec.3 Definitions
The dictionary in schedule 2 defines particular words used in these rules.
r 3 amd 2022 SL No. 18 s 4
sec.4
Application of rules
sec.4 Application of rules
These rules apply to a P&E Court proceeding.
If these rules do not provide for a matter in relation to a P&E Court proceeding and the rules applying in the District Court would provide for the matter in relation to a proceeding in the District Court, the rules applying in the District Court apply for the matter in the P&E Court with necessary changes.
Under section 13 (4) of the Act , the rules may be uniform rules that apply to other courts.
See section 14 (5) of the Act for when an order or direction of the P&E Court, or a direction of the Chief Judge, prevails over these rules.
(sec.4-ssec.1) These rules apply to a P&E Court proceeding.
(sec.4-ssec.2) If these rules do not provide for a matter in relation to a P&E Court proceeding and the rules applying in the District Court would provide for the matter in relation to a proceeding in the District Court, the rules applying in the District Court apply for the matter in the P&E Court with necessary changes. Under section 13 (4) of the Act , the rules may be uniform rules that apply to other courts. See section 14 (5) of the Act for when an order or direction of the P&E Court, or a direction of the Chief Judge, prevails over these rules.
1 Under section 13 (4) of the Act , the rules may be uniform rules that apply to other courts.
2 See section 14 (5) of the Act for when an order or direction of the P&E Court, or a direction of the Chief Judge, prevails over these rules.
sec.5
Compliance with rules and orders of the P&E Court
sec.5 Compliance with rules and orders of the P&E Court
The P&E Court may—
waive compliance with a provision of these rules if the court considers compliance would be likely to cause injustice, unreasonable expense or inconvenience or otherwise considers waiving compliance appropriate; or
excuse noncompliance with a provision of these rules; or
impose appropriate sanctions if a party to a P&E Court proceeding does not comply with these rules or an order of the court.
The P&E Court may dismiss a P&E Court proceeding if a party to the proceeding fails to proceed as required by these rules or an order of the court.
(a) waive compliance with a provision of these rules if the court considers compliance would be likely to cause injustice, unreasonable expense or inconvenience or otherwise considers waiving compliance appropriate; or
(b) excuse noncompliance with a provision of these rules; or
(c) impose appropriate sanctions if a party to a P&E Court proceeding does not comply with these rules or an order of the court. Example for paragraph (c) — The P&E Court may dismiss a P&E Court proceeding if a party to the proceeding fails to proceed as required by these rules or an order of the court.
pt.2
Conduct of P&E Court proceedings
Conduct of P&E Court proceedings
pt.2-div.1
Starting P&E Court proceedings
Starting P&E Court proceedings
sec.6
Starting P&E Court proceeding other than appeal
sec.6 Starting P&E Court proceeding other than appeal
A P&E Court proceeding, other than an appeal, is started by filing an originating application.
a declaratory proceeding
For starting a Planning Act appeal, see the Planning Act , section 230 .
sec.7
Where to start P&E Court proceeding
sec.7 Where to start P&E Court proceeding
A P&E Court proceeding may be started in any registry of the P&E Court.
For the registries of the P&E Court, see section 68 of the Act .
sec.8
Originating process—respondent
sec.8 Originating process—respondent
An originating application must name as a respondent the entity directly affected by the relief sought.
A notice of appeal must name as a respondent or co-respondent the entity that is the respondent or co-respondent under an Act.
(sec.8-ssec.1) An originating application must name as a respondent the entity directly affected by the relief sought.
(sec.8-ssec.2) A notice of appeal must name as a respondent or co-respondent the entity that is the respondent or co-respondent under an Act.
sec.9
Originating process—content
sec.9 Originating process—content
The originating process for a P&E Court proceeding must state—
the orders or other relief sought in the proceeding; and
the grounds on which the orders or other relief are sought.
(a) the orders or other relief sought in the proceeding; and
(b) the grounds on which the orders or other relief are sought.
sec.10
Originating process—contact details and address for service of applicant or appellant
sec.10 Originating process—contact details and address for service of applicant or appellant
An applicant or appellant intending to act personally must ensure all of the following details are stated on the originating process before it is filed—
the residential or business address of the applicant or appellant;
if the address stated under paragraph (a) is not in Queensland—an address in Queensland where documents may be served on the applicant or appellant;
the telephone number, if any, of the applicant or appellant;
if the applicant or appellant does not have a telephone number—a way of contacting the applicant or appellant by telephone;
the email address, if any, of the applicant or appellant;
the fax number, if any, of the applicant or appellant.
A lawyer or agent acting for an applicant or appellant must ensure all of the following details are stated on the originating process before it is filed—
the residential or business address of the applicant or appellant;
the name of the lawyer or agent and, if the lawyer or agent practises in a firm, the name of the firm;
the address of the place of business of the lawyer or agent;
if the address stated under paragraph (c) is not the applicant’s or appellant’s address for service or is not an address in Queensland—an address for service in Queensland including, for example, an address approved by the P&E Court as the address for service;
the telephone number of the lawyer or agent;
the email address of the lawyer or agent;
the fax number, if any, of the lawyer or agent.
If the lawyer or agent, or the lawyer’s or agent’s firm, is a member of an approved document exchange, the lawyer or agent may include the document exchange address with the details required under subrule (2) .
Notice of any change in an applicant’s or appellant’s address for service must be filed and served on each other party to the P&E Court proceeding.
The address for service of an applicant or appellant is—
for an applicant or appellant acting personally—
if the applicant or appellant is required to state an address under subrule (1) (b) —that address; or
otherwise—the address stated under subrule (1) (a) ; or
for an applicant or appellant for whom a lawyer or agent acts—
if an address is stated under subrule (2) (d) —that address; or
otherwise—the address stated under subrule (2) (c) .
In this rule—
approved document exchange means a document exchange approved under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 , rule 102 .
(sec.10-ssec.1) An applicant or appellant intending to act personally must ensure all of the following details are stated on the originating process before it is filed— the residential or business address of the applicant or appellant; if the address stated under paragraph (a) is not in Queensland—an address in Queensland where documents may be served on the applicant or appellant; the telephone number, if any, of the applicant or appellant; if the applicant or appellant does not have a telephone number—a way of contacting the applicant or appellant by telephone; the email address, if any, of the applicant or appellant; the fax number, if any, of the applicant or appellant.
(sec.10-ssec.2) A lawyer or agent acting for an applicant or appellant must ensure all of the following details are stated on the originating process before it is filed— the residential or business address of the applicant or appellant; the name of the lawyer or agent and, if the lawyer or agent practises in a firm, the name of the firm; the address of the place of business of the lawyer or agent; if the address stated under paragraph (c) is not the applicant’s or appellant’s address for service or is not an address in Queensland—an address for service in Queensland including, for example, an address approved by the P&E Court as the address for service; the telephone number of the lawyer or agent; the email address of the lawyer or agent; the fax number, if any, of the lawyer or agent.
(sec.10-ssec.3) If the lawyer or agent, or the lawyer’s or agent’s firm, is a member of an approved document exchange, the lawyer or agent may include the document exchange address with the details required under subrule (2) .
(sec.10-ssec.4) Notice of any change in an applicant’s or appellant’s address for service must be filed and served on each other party to the P&E Court proceeding.
(sec.10-ssec.5) The address for service of an applicant or appellant is— for an applicant or appellant acting personally— if the applicant or appellant is required to state an address under subrule (1) (b) —that address; or otherwise—the address stated under subrule (1) (a) ; or for an applicant or appellant for whom a lawyer or agent acts— if an address is stated under subrule (2) (d) —that address; or otherwise—the address stated under subrule (2) (c) .
(sec.10-ssec.6) In this rule— approved document exchange means a document exchange approved under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 , rule 102 .
(a) the residential or business address of the applicant or appellant;
(b) if the address stated under paragraph (a) is not in Queensland—an address in Queensland where documents may be served on the applicant or appellant;
(c) the telephone number, if any, of the applicant or appellant;
(d) if the applicant or appellant does not have a telephone number—a way of contacting the applicant or appellant by telephone;
(e) the email address, if any, of the applicant or appellant;
(f) the fax number, if any, of the applicant or appellant.
(a) the residential or business address of the applicant or appellant;
(b) the name of the lawyer or agent and, if the lawyer or agent practises in a firm, the name of the firm;
(c) the address of the place of business of the lawyer or agent;
(d) if the address stated under paragraph (c) is not the applicant’s or appellant’s address for service or is not an address in Queensland—an address for service in Queensland including, for example, an address approved by the P&E Court as the address for service;
(e) the telephone number of the lawyer or agent;
(f) the email address of the lawyer or agent;
(g) the fax number, if any, of the lawyer or agent.
(a) for an applicant or appellant acting personally— (i) if the applicant or appellant is required to state an address under subrule (1) (b) —that address; or (ii) otherwise—the address stated under subrule (1) (a) ; or
(i) if the applicant or appellant is required to state an address under subrule (1) (b) —that address; or
(ii) otherwise—the address stated under subrule (1) (a) ; or
(b) for an applicant or appellant for whom a lawyer or agent acts— (i) if an address is stated under subrule (2) (d) —that address; or (ii) otherwise—the address stated under subrule (2) (c) .
(i) if an address is stated under subrule (2) (d) —that address; or
(ii) otherwise—the address stated under subrule (2) (c) .
(i) if the applicant or appellant is required to state an address under subrule (1) (b) —that address; or
(ii) otherwise—the address stated under subrule (1) (a) ; or
(i) if an address is stated under subrule (2) (d) —that address; or
(ii) otherwise—the address stated under subrule (2) (c) .
sec.11
Originating process must be signed
sec.11 Originating process must be signed
The applicant or appellant, or the applicant’s or appellant’s lawyer or agent, must sign the originating process.
sec.12
Originating application must be served on other parties
sec.12 Originating application must be served on other parties
Unless the P&E Court otherwise orders under rule 19 , an applicant must, within 10 business days after filing the originating application, serve a copy of the application on each other party to the P&E Court proceeding.
For the requirement to serve a copy of a notice of appeal under the Planning Act to other parties, see the Planning Act , section 230 .
sec.13
Notice of declaratory proceeding
sec.13 Notice of declaratory proceeding
If an entity starts a declaratory proceeding, the entity must, on the day the entity starts the proceeding, give the chief executive written notice of the proceeding.
pt.2-div.2
Entries of appearance and notices of election
Entries of appearance and notices of election
sec.14
Entity named in originating process must file and serve entry of appearance
sec.14 Entity named in originating process must file and serve entry of appearance
This rule applies to an entity—
that is named as a respondent in an originating application and wishes to be heard on the application; or
that—
is named as a respondent or co-respondent in a notice of appeal; and
is entitled, under an Act, to be heard on the appeal; and
wishes to be heard on the appeal.
The entity must, within 10 business days after being served with a copy of the originating process—
file an entry of appearance in the approved form (an entry of appearance ); and
serve a copy of the entry of appearance on each other party to the P&E Court proceeding.
(sec.14-ssec.1) This rule applies to an entity— that is named as a respondent in an originating application and wishes to be heard on the application; or that— is named as a respondent or co-respondent in a notice of appeal; and is entitled, under an Act, to be heard on the appeal; and wishes to be heard on the appeal.
(sec.14-ssec.2) The entity must, within 10 business days after being served with a copy of the originating process— file an entry of appearance in the approved form (an entry of appearance ); and serve a copy of the entry of appearance on each other party to the P&E Court proceeding.
(a) that is named as a respondent in an originating application and wishes to be heard on the application; or
(b) that— (i) is named as a respondent or co-respondent in a notice of appeal; and (ii) is entitled, under an Act, to be heard on the appeal; and (iii) wishes to be heard on the appeal.
(i) is named as a respondent or co-respondent in a notice of appeal; and
(ii) is entitled, under an Act, to be heard on the appeal; and
(iii) wishes to be heard on the appeal.
(i) is named as a respondent or co-respondent in a notice of appeal; and
(ii) is entitled, under an Act, to be heard on the appeal; and
(iii) wishes to be heard on the appeal.
(a) file an entry of appearance in the approved form (an entry of appearance ); and
(b) serve a copy of the entry of appearance on each other party to the P&E Court proceeding.
sec.15
Entity electing to be party must file and serve notice of election
sec.15 Entity electing to be party must file and serve notice of election
This rule applies to an entity that—
is not named as a party to a P&E Court proceeding; and
is entitled, under an Act, to elect to be a party to the proceeding; and
wishes to be heard in the proceeding.
The entity must, within 10 business days after receiving the originating process—
file a notice of election in the approved form (the notice of election ); and
serve a copy of the notice of election on each other party to the P&E Court proceeding.
For a Planning Act appeal, see also the requirement to file a notice of election under the Planning Act , section 230 (6) .
On filing the notice of election, the entity becomes a party to the P&E Court proceeding.
(sec.15-ssec.1) This rule applies to an entity that— is not named as a party to a P&E Court proceeding; and is entitled, under an Act, to elect to be a party to the proceeding; and wishes to be heard in the proceeding.
(sec.15-ssec.2) The entity must, within 10 business days after receiving the originating process— file a notice of election in the approved form (the notice of election ); and serve a copy of the notice of election on each other party to the P&E Court proceeding. For a Planning Act appeal, see also the requirement to file a notice of election under the Planning Act , section 230 (6) .
(sec.15-ssec.3) On filing the notice of election, the entity becomes a party to the P&E Court proceeding.
(a) is not named as a party to a P&E Court proceeding; and
(b) is entitled, under an Act, to elect to be a party to the proceeding; and
(c) wishes to be heard in the proceeding.
(a) file a notice of election in the approved form (the notice of election ); and
(b) serve a copy of the notice of election on each other party to the P&E Court proceeding.
pt.2-div.3
Discontinuing or withdrawing from P&E Court proceedings
Discontinuing or withdrawing from P&E Court proceedings
sec.16
Applicant or appellant may discontinue or withdraw part of P&E Court proceeding
sec.16 Applicant or appellant may discontinue or withdraw part of P&E Court proceeding
An applicant or appellant may discontinue a P&E Court proceeding started by the applicant or appellant, or withdraw part of it—
by—
filing a notice of discontinuance or withdrawal in the approved form; and
serving a copy of the notice on each other active party to the proceeding; and
filing an affidavit stating the day a copy of the notice was served on each other active party; or
with the P&E Court’s leave.
If, after being served with a copy of the notice, an active party wishes to make an application to the P&E Court about the P&E Court proceeding, the active party must make the application within 14 days after the day the active party was served under subrule (1) (a) .
If an application is made under subrule (2) , the discontinuance or withdrawal takes effect on the day the P&E Court decides the application or a later day decided by the court.
If no application is made under subrule (2) , the discontinuance or withdrawal takes effect at the end of 14 days after the latest day on which an active party was served under subrule (1) (a) .
(sec.16-ssec.1) An applicant or appellant may discontinue a P&E Court proceeding started by the applicant or appellant, or withdraw part of it— by— filing a notice of discontinuance or withdrawal in the approved form; and serving a copy of the notice on each other active party to the proceeding; and filing an affidavit stating the day a copy of the notice was served on each other active party; or with the P&E Court’s leave.
(sec.16-ssec.2) If, after being served with a copy of the notice, an active party wishes to make an application to the P&E Court about the P&E Court proceeding, the active party must make the application within 14 days after the day the active party was served under subrule (1) (a) .
(sec.16-ssec.3) If an application is made under subrule (2) , the discontinuance or withdrawal takes effect on the day the P&E Court decides the application or a later day decided by the court.
(sec.16-ssec.4) If no application is made under subrule (2) , the discontinuance or withdrawal takes effect at the end of 14 days after the latest day on which an active party was served under subrule (1) (a) .
(a) by— (i) filing a notice of discontinuance or withdrawal in the approved form; and (ii) serving a copy of the notice on each other active party to the proceeding; and (iii) filing an affidavit stating the day a copy of the notice was served on each other active party; or
(i) filing a notice of discontinuance or withdrawal in the approved form; and
(ii) serving a copy of the notice on each other active party to the proceeding; and
(iii) filing an affidavit stating the day a copy of the notice was served on each other active party; or
(b) with the P&E Court’s leave.
(i) filing a notice of discontinuance or withdrawal in the approved form; and
(ii) serving a copy of the notice on each other active party to the proceeding; and
(iii) filing an affidavit stating the day a copy of the notice was served on each other active party; or
sec.17
Active party by election may withdraw
sec.17 Active party by election may withdraw
An active party by election to a P&E Court proceeding may withdraw as an active party to the proceeding—
by—
filing a notice of withdrawal of election to co-respond in the approved form; and
serving a copy of the notice on each other active party to the proceeding; and
filing an affidavit stating the day a copy of the notice was served on each other active party; or
with the P&E Court’s leave.
If another active party served with a copy of the notice wishes to make an application to the P&E Court about the withdrawal of the active party by election, the other active party must make the application within 14 days after the day the other active party was served under subrule (1) (a) .
If an application is made under subrule (2) , the withdrawal takes effect on the day the P&E Court decides the application or a later day decided by the court.
If no application is made under subrule (2) , the withdrawal takes effect at the end of 14 days after the latest day on which an active party was served under subrule (1) (a) .
In this rule—
active party by election , to a P&E Court proceeding, means an entity that has filed and served a notice of election for the proceeding under rule 15 (2) .
(sec.17-ssec.1) An active party by election to a P&E Court proceeding may withdraw as an active party to the proceeding— by— filing a notice of withdrawal of election to co-respond in the approved form; and serving a copy of the notice on each other active party to the proceeding; and filing an affidavit stating the day a copy of the notice was served on each other active party; or with the P&E Court’s leave.
(sec.17-ssec.2) If another active party served with a copy of the notice wishes to make an application to the P&E Court about the withdrawal of the active party by election, the other active party must make the application within 14 days after the day the other active party was served under subrule (1) (a) .
(sec.17-ssec.3) If an application is made under subrule (2) , the withdrawal takes effect on the day the P&E Court decides the application or a later day decided by the court.
(sec.17-ssec.4) If no application is made under subrule (2) , the withdrawal takes effect at the end of 14 days after the latest day on which an active party was served under subrule (1) (a) .
(sec.17-ssec.5) In this rule— active party by election , to a P&E Court proceeding, means an entity that has filed and served a notice of election for the proceeding under rule 15 (2) .
(a) by— (i) filing a notice of withdrawal of election to co-respond in the approved form; and (ii) serving a copy of the notice on each other active party to the proceeding; and (iii) filing an affidavit stating the day a copy of the notice was served on each other active party; or
(i) filing a notice of withdrawal of election to co-respond in the approved form; and
(ii) serving a copy of the notice on each other active party to the proceeding; and
(iii) filing an affidavit stating the day a copy of the notice was served on each other active party; or
(b) with the P&E Court’s leave.
(i) filing a notice of withdrawal of election to co-respond in the approved form; and
(ii) serving a copy of the notice on each other active party to the proceeding; and
(iii) filing an affidavit stating the day a copy of the notice was served on each other active party; or
pt.2-div.4
Hearing P&E Court proceedings
Hearing P&E Court proceedings
sec.18
Where P&E Court proceeding is heard
sec.18 Where P&E Court proceeding is heard
A P&E Court proceeding must be heard in the P&E Court sitting at the place where the originating process for the proceeding is filed (the first place ).
However, the P&E Court proceeding, or part of it, may be heard in the P&E Court sitting at another place (the other place ) if—
the court orders the proceeding or part be heard in the court sitting at the other place; or
an affidavit (an affidavit of consent ) is filed at the first place evidencing the consent of all the active parties to the proceeding that the proceeding or part be heard in the court sitting at the other place.
An application for an order under subrule (2) (a) must be made to the P&E Court sitting at the first place.
The application must be heard in the P&E Court sitting at the first place unless no judge of the court is available to hear the application returnable in the court sitting at the first place on the day the applicant seeks to be heard on the application.
If, under subrule (2) , the P&E Court proceeding or part is not to be heard in the P&E Court sitting at the first place, the registrar of the court sitting at the first place must, immediately on the order being made or the affidavit of consent being filed—
give the registrar of the court sitting at the other place copies of all documents in the proceeding filed in the court sitting at the first place and necessary for the hearing; and
give the active parties to the proceeding written notice of the transfer to the court sitting at the other place.
(sec.18-ssec.1) A P&E Court proceeding must be heard in the P&E Court sitting at the place where the originating process for the proceeding is filed (the first place ).
(sec.18-ssec.2) However, the P&E Court proceeding, or part of it, may be heard in the P&E Court sitting at another place (the other place ) if— the court orders the proceeding or part be heard in the court sitting at the other place; or an affidavit (an affidavit of consent ) is filed at the first place evidencing the consent of all the active parties to the proceeding that the proceeding or part be heard in the court sitting at the other place.
(sec.18-ssec.3) An application for an order under subrule (2) (a) must be made to the P&E Court sitting at the first place.
(sec.18-ssec.4) The application must be heard in the P&E Court sitting at the first place unless no judge of the court is available to hear the application returnable in the court sitting at the first place on the day the applicant seeks to be heard on the application.
(sec.18-ssec.5) If, under subrule (2) , the P&E Court proceeding or part is not to be heard in the P&E Court sitting at the first place, the registrar of the court sitting at the first place must, immediately on the order being made or the affidavit of consent being filed— give the registrar of the court sitting at the other place copies of all documents in the proceeding filed in the court sitting at the first place and necessary for the hearing; and give the active parties to the proceeding written notice of the transfer to the court sitting at the other place.
(a) the court orders the proceeding or part be heard in the court sitting at the other place; or
(b) an affidavit (an affidavit of consent ) is filed at the first place evidencing the consent of all the active parties to the proceeding that the proceeding or part be heard in the court sitting at the other place.
(a) give the registrar of the court sitting at the other place copies of all documents in the proceeding filed in the court sitting at the first place and necessary for the hearing; and
(b) give the active parties to the proceeding written notice of the transfer to the court sitting at the other place.
sec.19
P&E Court proceeding started by originating application without notice
sec.19 P&E Court proceeding started by originating application without notice
This rule applies in relation to a P&E Court proceeding started by filing an originating application.
If the P&E Court considers it appropriate because of urgent circumstances in a particular case, the court may, without the applicant in the P&E Court proceeding giving notice to any other entity—
order the proceeding be heard and decided; and
make any other order in relation to the proceeding.
(sec.19-ssec.1) This rule applies in relation to a P&E Court proceeding started by filing an originating application.
(sec.19-ssec.2) If the P&E Court considers it appropriate because of urgent circumstances in a particular case, the court may, without the applicant in the P&E Court proceeding giving notice to any other entity— order the proceeding be heard and decided; and make any other order in relation to the proceeding.
(a) order the proceeding be heard and decided; and
(b) make any other order in relation to the proceeding.
sec.20
P&E Court may make orders and give directions
sec.20 P&E Court may make orders and give directions
The P&E Court may make an order or give directions about a P&E Court proceeding the court considers appropriate—
at any time; or
on application by an active party to the proceeding.
An active party to a P&E Court proceeding may, at any time, apply to the P&E Court for an order or directions about the proceeding.
However, the active party to a P&E Court proceeding with the onus in the proceeding must, as soon as practicable, but within 3 months after the applicant or appellant files the originating process for the proceeding, apply to the P&E Court for an order or directions about the proceeding.
Subrule (3) does not apply if another active party to the P&E Court proceeding has already applied to the P&E Court for an order or directions about the proceeding.
Without limiting subrule (1) , (2) or (3) , an order or directions, or an application for an order or directions, about a P&E Court proceeding may be for 1 or more of the following—
an order or directions about compliance with a requirement under the Planning Act , section 53 ;
an order or directions to identify an issue to be decided in the proceeding at a preliminary stage of the proceeding;
an order about the conduct of the proceeding or directions about a procedural matter, including an order or directions about 1 or more of the following—
identifying matters as an issue in dispute in the proceeding;
the content and performance of a dispute resolution plan for the proceeding;
exchanging lists of witnesses, including expert witnesses;
meetings of experts and the production of joint reports of the experts under part 3 ;
exchanging statements of witnesses the active parties to the proceeding intend to call;
a review by the court of the conduct of the proceeding;
giving, for use by the court before the hearing, a copy of—
a document identifying the issues in dispute in the proceeding; or
an extract of a planning instrument relevant to the proceeding; or
a report for the proceeding, including a joint report, under part 3 ; or
a book of documents for the proceeding;
limiting the duration of the hearing;
limiting the time to be taken by an active party to the proceeding in presenting the active party’s case;
requiring evidence to be given by affidavit, orally or in another form;
requiring expert witnesses in the same field to give evidence consecutively, concurrently or in another way;
limiting the number of witnesses an active party may call on a particular issue in dispute in the proceeding;
limiting the time to be taken in examining, cross-examining or re-examining a witness;
requiring an opening address or submission to be made in the way the court directs;
limiting the time to be taken for an opening address or in making oral submissions;
limiting the length of a written submission, affidavit or report for a proceeding under part 3 ;
any other matter the court considers appropriate.
In this rule—
book of documents , for a P&E Court proceeding, means a bundle of documents to be tendered at the hearing of the proceeding with the consent of the active parties to the proceeding.
dispute resolution plan , for a P&E Court proceeding, means a plan prepared for narrowing and, if possible, resolving by agreement issues in dispute in the proceeding.
r 20 amd 2022 SL No. 18 s 5
(sec.20-ssec.1) The P&E Court may make an order or give directions about a P&E Court proceeding the court considers appropriate— at any time; or on application by an active party to the proceeding.
(sec.20-ssec.2) An active party to a P&E Court proceeding may, at any time, apply to the P&E Court for an order or directions about the proceeding.
(sec.20-ssec.3) However, the active party to a P&E Court proceeding with the onus in the proceeding must, as soon as practicable, but within 3 months after the applicant or appellant files the originating process for the proceeding, apply to the P&E Court for an order or directions about the proceeding.
(sec.20-ssec.4) Subrule (3) does not apply if another active party to the P&E Court proceeding has already applied to the P&E Court for an order or directions about the proceeding.
(sec.20-ssec.5) Without limiting subrule (1) , (2) or (3) , an order or directions, or an application for an order or directions, about a P&E Court proceeding may be for 1 or more of the following— an order or directions about compliance with a requirement under the Planning Act , section 53 ; an order or directions to identify an issue to be decided in the proceeding at a preliminary stage of the proceeding; an order about the conduct of the proceeding or directions about a procedural matter, including an order or directions about 1 or more of the following— identifying matters as an issue in dispute in the proceeding; the content and performance of a dispute resolution plan for the proceeding; exchanging lists of witnesses, including expert witnesses; meetings of experts and the production of joint reports of the experts under part 3 ; exchanging statements of witnesses the active parties to the proceeding intend to call; a review by the court of the conduct of the proceeding; giving, for use by the court before the hearing, a copy of— a document identifying the issues in dispute in the proceeding; or an extract of a planning instrument relevant to the proceeding; or a report for the proceeding, including a joint report, under part 3 ; or a book of documents for the proceeding; limiting the duration of the hearing; limiting the time to be taken by an active party to the proceeding in presenting the active party’s case; requiring evidence to be given by affidavit, orally or in another form; requiring expert witnesses in the same field to give evidence consecutively, concurrently or in another way; limiting the number of witnesses an active party may call on a particular issue in dispute in the proceeding; limiting the time to be taken in examining, cross-examining or re-examining a witness; requiring an opening address or submission to be made in the way the court directs; limiting the time to be taken for an opening address or in making oral submissions; limiting the length of a written submission, affidavit or report for a proceeding under part 3 ; any other matter the court considers appropriate.
(sec.20-ssec.6) In this rule— book of documents , for a P&E Court proceeding, means a bundle of documents to be tendered at the hearing of the proceeding with the consent of the active parties to the proceeding. dispute resolution plan , for a P&E Court proceeding, means a plan prepared for narrowing and, if possible, resolving by agreement issues in dispute in the proceeding.
(a) at any time; or
(b) on application by an active party to the proceeding.
(a) an order or directions about compliance with a requirement under the Planning Act , section 53 ;
(b) an order or directions to identify an issue to be decided in the proceeding at a preliminary stage of the proceeding;
(c) an order about the conduct of the proceeding or directions about a procedural matter, including an order or directions about 1 or more of the following— (i) identifying matters as an issue in dispute in the proceeding; (ii) the content and performance of a dispute resolution plan for the proceeding; (iii) exchanging lists of witnesses, including expert witnesses; (iv) meetings of experts and the production of joint reports of the experts under part 3 ; (v) exchanging statements of witnesses the active parties to the proceeding intend to call; (vi) a review by the court of the conduct of the proceeding; (vii) giving, for use by the court before the hearing, a copy of— (A) a document identifying the issues in dispute in the proceeding; or (B) an extract of a planning instrument relevant to the proceeding; or (C) a report for the proceeding, including a joint report, under part 3 ; or (D) a book of documents for the proceeding; (viii) limiting the duration of the hearing; (ix) limiting the time to be taken by an active party to the proceeding in presenting the active party’s case; (x) requiring evidence to be given by affidavit, orally or in another form; (xi) requiring expert witnesses in the same field to give evidence consecutively, concurrently or in another way; (xii) limiting the number of witnesses an active party may call on a particular issue in dispute in the proceeding; (xiii) limiting the time to be taken in examining, cross-examining or re-examining a witness; (xiv) requiring an opening address or submission to be made in the way the court directs; (xv) limiting the time to be taken for an opening address or in making oral submissions; (xvi) limiting the length of a written submission, affidavit or report for a proceeding under part 3 ; (xvii) any other matter the court considers appropriate.
(i) identifying matters as an issue in dispute in the proceeding;
(ii) the content and performance of a dispute resolution plan for the proceeding;
(iii) exchanging lists of witnesses, including expert witnesses;
(iv) meetings of experts and the production of joint reports of the experts under part 3 ;
(v) exchanging statements of witnesses the active parties to the proceeding intend to call;
(vi) a review by the court of the conduct of the proceeding;
(vii) giving, for use by the court before the hearing, a copy of— (A) a document identifying the issues in dispute in the proceeding; or (B) an extract of a planning instrument relevant to the proceeding; or (C) a report for the proceeding, including a joint report, under part 3 ; or (D) a book of documents for the proceeding;
(A) a document identifying the issues in dispute in the proceeding; or
(B) an extract of a planning instrument relevant to the proceeding; or
(C) a report for the proceeding, including a joint report, under part 3 ; or
(D) a book of documents for the proceeding;
(viii) limiting the duration of the hearing;
(ix) limiting the time to be taken by an active party to the proceeding in presenting the active party’s case;
(x) requiring evidence to be given by affidavit, orally or in another form;
(xi) requiring expert witnesses in the same field to give evidence consecutively, concurrently or in another way;
(xii) limiting the number of witnesses an active party may call on a particular issue in dispute in the proceeding;
(xiii) limiting the time to be taken in examining, cross-examining or re-examining a witness;
(xiv) requiring an opening address or submission to be made in the way the court directs;
(xv) limiting the time to be taken for an opening address or in making oral submissions;
(xvi) limiting the length of a written submission, affidavit or report for a proceeding under part 3 ;
(xvii) any other matter the court considers appropriate.
(i) identifying matters as an issue in dispute in the proceeding;
(ii) the content and performance of a dispute resolution plan for the proceeding;
(iii) exchanging lists of witnesses, including expert witnesses;
(iv) meetings of experts and the production of joint reports of the experts under part 3 ;
(v) exchanging statements of witnesses the active parties to the proceeding intend to call;
(vi) a review by the court of the conduct of the proceeding;
(vii) giving, for use by the court before the hearing, a copy of— (A) a document identifying the issues in dispute in the proceeding; or (B) an extract of a planning instrument relevant to the proceeding; or (C) a report for the proceeding, including a joint report, under part 3 ; or (D) a book of documents for the proceeding;
(A) a document identifying the issues in dispute in the proceeding; or
(B) an extract of a planning instrument relevant to the proceeding; or
(C) a report for the proceeding, including a joint report, under part 3 ; or
(D) a book of documents for the proceeding;
(viii) limiting the duration of the hearing;
(ix) limiting the time to be taken by an active party to the proceeding in presenting the active party’s case;
(x) requiring evidence to be given by affidavit, orally or in another form;
(xi) requiring expert witnesses in the same field to give evidence consecutively, concurrently or in another way;
(xii) limiting the number of witnesses an active party may call on a particular issue in dispute in the proceeding;
(xiii) limiting the time to be taken in examining, cross-examining or re-examining a witness;
(xiv) requiring an opening address or submission to be made in the way the court directs;
(xv) limiting the time to be taken for an opening address or in making oral submissions;
(xvi) limiting the length of a written submission, affidavit or report for a proceeding under part 3 ;
(xvii) any other matter the court considers appropriate.
(A) a document identifying the issues in dispute in the proceeding; or
(B) an extract of a planning instrument relevant to the proceeding; or
(C) a report for the proceeding, including a joint report, under part 3 ; or
(D) a book of documents for the proceeding;
sec.21
Copy of draft order or directions must be served
sec.21 Copy of draft order or directions must be served
If an active party to a P&E Court proceeding (the relevant party ) applies, under rule 20 , for an order or directions about the proceeding, the relevant party must give the other active parties to the application a copy of a draft of the order or directions the relevant party is seeking (the draft order ) not later than 2 days before the day the application is to be heard.
If an active party to the application receives a copy of the draft order, the active party must tell the relevant party and the other active parties to the application whether the draft order is accepted or rejected—
as soon as practicable after receiving the draft order; and
not later than 4p.m. on the day before the application is to be heard.
If the draft order is rejected by an active party to the application (the rejecting party ), the rejecting party must give the relevant party and other active parties to the application a copy of a draft of any orders or directions the rejecting party is seeking not later than 4p.m. on the day before the application is to be heard.
(sec.21-ssec.1) If an active party to a P&E Court proceeding (the relevant party ) applies, under rule 20 , for an order or directions about the proceeding, the relevant party must give the other active parties to the application a copy of a draft of the order or directions the relevant party is seeking (the draft order ) not later than 2 days before the day the application is to be heard.
(sec.21-ssec.2) If an active party to the application receives a copy of the draft order, the active party must tell the relevant party and the other active parties to the application whether the draft order is accepted or rejected— as soon as practicable after receiving the draft order; and not later than 4p.m. on the day before the application is to be heard.
(sec.21-ssec.3) If the draft order is rejected by an active party to the application (the rejecting party ), the rejecting party must give the relevant party and other active parties to the application a copy of a draft of any orders or directions the rejecting party is seeking not later than 4p.m. on the day before the application is to be heard.
(a) as soon as practicable after receiving the draft order; and
(b) not later than 4p.m. on the day before the application is to be heard.
sec.22
Effect of orders or directions under r 20
sec.22 Effect of orders or directions under r 20
If the P&E Court makes an order or gives directions under rule 20 about a P&E Court proceeding, the court may—
decline to set a date for hearing the proceeding until the court is satisfied the active parties to the application have complied with the order or directions; or
if the court considers it appropriate having regard to exceptional circumstances in relation to the proceeding—hear the proceeding without the order or directions being complied with; or
do anything else in relation to the conduct of the proceeding the court considers appropriate.
(a) decline to set a date for hearing the proceeding until the court is satisfied the active parties to the application have complied with the order or directions; or
(b) if the court considers it appropriate having regard to exceptional circumstances in relation to the proceeding—hear the proceeding without the order or directions being complied with; or
(c) do anything else in relation to the conduct of the proceeding the court considers appropriate.
pt.3
Evidence
Evidence
pt.3-div.1
Preliminary
Preliminary
sec.23
Definitions for part
sec.23 Definitions for part
In this part—
code of conduct means the code of conduct for experts set out in schedule 1 .
r 23 def code of conduct ins 2022 SL No. 18 s 6 (2)
joint report see rule 28 (1) .
r 23 def joint report sub 2022 SL No. 18 s 6 (1) – (2)
meeting of experts —
means a meeting at which experts in each area of expertise relevant to a P&E Court proceeding meet—
to discuss and attempt to reach agreement about the experts’ evidence in relation to an issue in dispute in the proceeding as it relates to the experts’ area of expertise; and
to prepare a joint report; and
includes a resumed meeting of experts or further meeting of experts.
r 23 def meeting of experts amd 2022 SL No. 18 s 6 (3)
report , for a P&E Court proceeding—
means a document giving an expert’s opinion on an issue arising in the proceeding; and
includes, for example—
a joint report; and
a separate report; and
a supplementary report.
r 23 def report ins 2022 SL No. 18 s 6 (2)
separate report , for a P&E Court proceeding, means a report other than—
a joint report; or
a supplementary report.
r 23 def separate report ins 2022 SL No. 18 s 6 (2)
supplementary report see rule 35B (3) (a) .
r 23 def supplementary report ins 2022 SL No. 18 s 6 (2)
(sec.23-ssec) In this part— code of conduct means the code of conduct for experts set out in schedule 1 . r 23 def code of conduct ins 2022 SL No. 18 s 6 (2) joint report see rule 28 (1) . r 23 def joint report sub 2022 SL No. 18 s 6 (1) – (2) meeting of experts — means a meeting at which experts in each area of expertise relevant to a P&E Court proceeding meet— to discuss and attempt to reach agreement about the experts’ evidence in relation to an issue in dispute in the proceeding as it relates to the experts’ area of expertise; and to prepare a joint report; and includes a resumed meeting of experts or further meeting of experts. r 23 def meeting of experts amd 2022 SL No. 18 s 6 (3) report , for a P&E Court proceeding— means a document giving an expert’s opinion on an issue arising in the proceeding; and includes, for example— a joint report; and a separate report; and a supplementary report. r 23 def report ins 2022 SL No. 18 s 6 (2) separate report , for a P&E Court proceeding, means a report other than— a joint report; or a supplementary report. r 23 def separate report ins 2022 SL No. 18 s 6 (2) supplementary report see rule 35B (3) (a) . r 23 def supplementary report ins 2022 SL No. 18 s 6 (2)
(a) means a meeting at which experts in each area of expertise relevant to a P&E Court proceeding meet— (i) to discuss and attempt to reach agreement about the experts’ evidence in relation to an issue in dispute in the proceeding as it relates to the experts’ area of expertise; and (ii) to prepare a joint report; and
(i) to discuss and attempt to reach agreement about the experts’ evidence in relation to an issue in dispute in the proceeding as it relates to the experts’ area of expertise; and
(ii) to prepare a joint report; and
(b) includes a resumed meeting of experts or further meeting of experts.
(i) to discuss and attempt to reach agreement about the experts’ evidence in relation to an issue in dispute in the proceeding as it relates to the experts’ area of expertise; and
(ii) to prepare a joint report; and
(a) means a document giving an expert’s opinion on an issue arising in the proceeding; and
(b) includes, for example— (i) a joint report; and (ii) a separate report; and (iii) a supplementary report.
(i) a joint report; and
(ii) a separate report; and
(iii) a supplementary report.
(i) a joint report; and
(ii) a separate report; and
(iii) a supplementary report.
(a) a joint report; or
(b) a supplementary report.
sec.24
References to active party
sec.24 References to active party
In this part, a reference to an active party to a P&E Court proceeding includes a reference to the active party’s lawyer or agent.
pt.3-div.2
General
General
sec.25
Rules of evidence
sec.25 Rules of evidence
The P&E Court may, at any time during a P&E Court proceeding, order that the rules of evidence do not apply to proving a fact if the court considers—
strict proof of the fact may cause unnecessary or unreasonable expense, delay or inconvenience in the proceeding; or
the fact is not seriously in dispute.
Without limiting subrule (1) , the P&E Court may order that the rules of evidence do not apply to proving handwriting or a document, authority or identity.
This rule applies regardless of the importance of the fact sought to be proved.
(sec.25-ssec.1) The P&E Court may, at any time during a P&E Court proceeding, order that the rules of evidence do not apply to proving a fact if the court considers— strict proof of the fact may cause unnecessary or unreasonable expense, delay or inconvenience in the proceeding; or the fact is not seriously in dispute.
(sec.25-ssec.2) Without limiting subrule (1) , the P&E Court may order that the rules of evidence do not apply to proving handwriting or a document, authority or identity.
(sec.25-ssec.3) This rule applies regardless of the importance of the fact sought to be proved.
(a) strict proof of the fact may cause unnecessary or unreasonable expense, delay or inconvenience in the proceeding; or
(b) the fact is not seriously in dispute.
sec.25A
Expert evidence given other than by report
sec.25A Expert evidence given other than by report
This rule applies if an expert in a P&E Court proceeding is called to give evidence, other than by report, in the proceeding.
The expert must give the evidence in person before the P&E Court.
However, the expert may give the evidence to the P&E Court by audio visual link or audio link if required to do so under—
an order or direction of the P&E Court; or
a direction of general application made by the Chief Judge under section 14 (2) of the Act .
In this rule—
audio link see the Evidence Act 1977 , section 39C .
audio visual link see the Evidence Act 1977 , schedule 3 .
r 25A ins 2022 SL No. 18 s 7
(sec.25A-ssec.1) This rule applies if an expert in a P&E Court proceeding is called to give evidence, other than by report, in the proceeding.
(sec.25A-ssec.2) The expert must give the evidence in person before the P&E Court.
(sec.25A-ssec.3) However, the expert may give the evidence to the P&E Court by audio visual link or audio link if required to do so under— an order or direction of the P&E Court; or a direction of general application made by the Chief Judge under section 14 (2) of the Act .
(sec.25A-ssec.4) In this rule— audio link see the Evidence Act 1977 , section 39C . audio visual link see the Evidence Act 1977 , schedule 3 .
(a) an order or direction of the P&E Court; or
(b) a direction of general application made by the Chief Judge under section 14 (2) of the Act .
pt.3-div.3
Meetings of experts
Meetings of experts
sec.26
Meeting of experts
sec.26 Meeting of experts
An ADR registrar must, if ordered or directed by the P&E Court, convene and chair a meeting of experts for the proceeding.
Also, an ADR registrar may, if asked by all the active parties to a P&E Court proceeding, convene and chair a meeting of experts for the proceeding.
(sec.26-ssec.1) An ADR registrar must, if ordered or directed by the P&E Court, convene and chair a meeting of experts for the proceeding.
(sec.26-ssec.2) Also, an ADR registrar may, if asked by all the active parties to a P&E Court proceeding, convene and chair a meeting of experts for the proceeding.
sec.27
Active parties must ensure experts ready to take part in meeting of experts
sec.27 Active parties must ensure experts ready to take part in meeting of experts
Before attending a meeting of experts, each active party to the P&E Court proceeding must do all things reasonably necessary or expedient to ensure an expert chosen by the active party is ready to take part fully, properly and promptly in the meeting, including by giving the expert—
reasonable notice that the P&E Court has ordered or directed a meeting of experts or that an ADR registrar has convened a meeting of experts; and
notice of the contents of any order or direction about the meeting, including the time by which the meeting must be held; and
reasonable notice of the issue in dispute in the proceeding to the extent it is relevant to the expert’s expertise; and
enough information and opportunity for the expert to adequately investigate the facts in relation to the issue in dispute in the proceeding.
r 27 amd 2022 SL No. 18 s 8
(a) reasonable notice that the P&E Court has ordered or directed a meeting of experts or that an ADR registrar has convened a meeting of experts; and
(b) notice of the contents of any order or direction about the meeting, including the time by which the meeting must be held; and
(c) reasonable notice of the issue in dispute in the proceeding to the extent it is relevant to the expert’s expertise; and
(d) enough information and opportunity for the expert to adequately investigate the facts in relation to the issue in dispute in the proceeding.
sec.28
Attending meeting of experts and preparing joint report
sec.28 Attending meeting of experts and preparing joint report
The experts attending a meeting of experts must jointly prepare a report in relation to the meeting (a joint report ) that states—
the matters, if any, on which the experts agree; and
the matters, if any, on which the experts disagree and the reasons for any disagreement.
In holding the meeting of experts, and preparing the joint report, the experts—
must exercise independent judgement; and
must endeavour to reach an agreement on any matter on which they disagree; and
must not act on any instruction or request to withhold or avoid reaching an agreement.
Unless the P&E Court orders or directs otherwise, the experts must—
hold the meeting of experts in the absence of the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding; and
prepare the joint report without reference to, or instructions from, the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding.
The joint report must confirm that—
each of the experts has read, and agrees to be bound by, the code of conduct; and
the factual matters stated in the report are, as far as each of the experts knows, true; and
each of the experts has made all inquiries considered appropriate; and
the opinions stated in the report are genuinely held by each of the experts; and
the report contains reference to all matters each of the experts considers significant; and
each of the experts understands the expert’s duty to the P&E Court and has complied with the duty.
The experts must give the joint report to the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding as soon as practicable after the meeting of experts has concluded and, in any case, as ordered or directed by the P&E Court.
This rule is subject to rule 28A .
r 28 amd 2019 SL No. 67 s 4
sub 2022 SL No. 18 s 9
(sec.28-ssec.1) The experts attending a meeting of experts must jointly prepare a report in relation to the meeting (a joint report ) that states— the matters, if any, on which the experts agree; and the matters, if any, on which the experts disagree and the reasons for any disagreement.
(sec.28-ssec.2) In holding the meeting of experts, and preparing the joint report, the experts— must exercise independent judgement; and must endeavour to reach an agreement on any matter on which they disagree; and must not act on any instruction or request to withhold or avoid reaching an agreement.
(sec.28-ssec.3) Unless the P&E Court orders or directs otherwise, the experts must— hold the meeting of experts in the absence of the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding; and prepare the joint report without reference to, or instructions from, the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding.
(sec.28-ssec.4) The joint report must confirm that— each of the experts has read, and agrees to be bound by, the code of conduct; and the factual matters stated in the report are, as far as each of the experts knows, true; and each of the experts has made all inquiries considered appropriate; and the opinions stated in the report are genuinely held by each of the experts; and the report contains reference to all matters each of the experts considers significant; and each of the experts understands the expert’s duty to the P&E Court and has complied with the duty.
(sec.28-ssec.5) The experts must give the joint report to the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding as soon as practicable after the meeting of experts has concluded and, in any case, as ordered or directed by the P&E Court.
(sec.28-ssec.6) This rule is subject to rule 28A .
(a) the matters, if any, on which the experts agree; and
(b) the matters, if any, on which the experts disagree and the reasons for any disagreement.
(a) must exercise independent judgement; and
(b) must endeavour to reach an agreement on any matter on which they disagree; and
(c) must not act on any instruction or request to withhold or avoid reaching an agreement.
(a) hold the meeting of experts in the absence of the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding; and
(b) prepare the joint report without reference to, or instructions from, the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding.
(a) each of the experts has read, and agrees to be bound by, the code of conduct; and
(b) the factual matters stated in the report are, as far as each of the experts knows, true; and
(c) each of the experts has made all inquiries considered appropriate; and
(d) the opinions stated in the report are genuinely held by each of the experts; and
(e) the report contains reference to all matters each of the experts considers significant; and
(f) each of the experts understands the expert’s duty to the P&E Court and has complied with the duty.
sec.28A
Permitted communications between experts and active parties
sec.28A Permitted communications between experts and active parties
Any of the experts may, at any time, participate in a without prejudice conference or mediation under part 5 involving the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding.
Also, any of the experts may, at any time before the joint report is completed, give 1 or more of the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding (each a recipient ) a written notice—
asking the recipient to respond to a request for information or other inquiry that may assist the proper and timely conduct or conclusion of the meeting of experts or preparation of the joint report; or
informing the recipient of any matter affecting the proper and timely conduct or conclusion of the meeting of experts or preparation of the joint report.
informing the active parties of a delay in gathering data for use in the joint report
However, a notice under subrule (2) may be given to an active party to the P&E Court proceeding only if—
all of the experts agree to the giving of the notice or, if the experts do not agree, the notice states the basis of the disagreement between the experts; and
a copy of the notice is given to all the experts and the other active parties at the same time as the notice is given to the active party.
The recipient of a notice given by an expert under subrule (2) may respond to the notice only if—
the response is in writing; and
before the response is made, a copy of the response is given to all the other active parties at the same time; and
the response is made—
not more than 10 business days after the notice is given to the recipient; and
not less than 5 business days, or the shorter period agreed to by the active parties, after the copy of the response is given to the other active parties; and
a copy of the response is given to all the other experts at the same time as the response is made.
An active party to the P&E Court proceeding (the requesting party ) may request the experts prepare a report (the conduct report ) about the proper and timely conduct or conclusion of the meeting of experts, or preparation of the joint report, if a copy of the request is given to all the other active parties at the same time the request is made.
An active party may request an update on when the joint report will be completed.
The conduct report may be given to the requesting party only if—
the conduct report is given not more than 2 business days after the request is received by the experts; and
all of the experts agree to the giving of the conduct report or, if the experts do not agree, the conduct report states the basis of the disagreement between the experts; and
the conduct report is in writing; and
a copy of the conduct report is given to all the other active parties at the same time as the conduct report is given to the requesting party.
r 28A ins 2022 SL No. 18 s 9
(sec.28A-ssec.1) Any of the experts may, at any time, participate in a without prejudice conference or mediation under part 5 involving the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding.
(sec.28A-ssec.2) Also, any of the experts may, at any time before the joint report is completed, give 1 or more of the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding (each a recipient ) a written notice— asking the recipient to respond to a request for information or other inquiry that may assist the proper and timely conduct or conclusion of the meeting of experts or preparation of the joint report; or informing the recipient of any matter affecting the proper and timely conduct or conclusion of the meeting of experts or preparation of the joint report. informing the active parties of a delay in gathering data for use in the joint report
(sec.28A-ssec.3) However, a notice under subrule (2) may be given to an active party to the P&E Court proceeding only if— all of the experts agree to the giving of the notice or, if the experts do not agree, the notice states the basis of the disagreement between the experts; and a copy of the notice is given to all the experts and the other active parties at the same time as the notice is given to the active party.
(sec.28A-ssec.4) The recipient of a notice given by an expert under subrule (2) may respond to the notice only if— the response is in writing; and before the response is made, a copy of the response is given to all the other active parties at the same time; and the response is made— not more than 10 business days after the notice is given to the recipient; and not less than 5 business days, or the shorter period agreed to by the active parties, after the copy of the response is given to the other active parties; and a copy of the response is given to all the other experts at the same time as the response is made.
(sec.28A-ssec.5) An active party to the P&E Court proceeding (the requesting party ) may request the experts prepare a report (the conduct report ) about the proper and timely conduct or conclusion of the meeting of experts, or preparation of the joint report, if a copy of the request is given to all the other active parties at the same time the request is made. An active party may request an update on when the joint report will be completed.
(sec.28A-ssec.6) The conduct report may be given to the requesting party only if— the conduct report is given not more than 2 business days after the request is received by the experts; and all of the experts agree to the giving of the conduct report or, if the experts do not agree, the conduct report states the basis of the disagreement between the experts; and the conduct report is in writing; and a copy of the conduct report is given to all the other active parties at the same time as the conduct report is given to the requesting party.
(a) asking the recipient to respond to a request for information or other inquiry that may assist the proper and timely conduct or conclusion of the meeting of experts or preparation of the joint report; or
(b) informing the recipient of any matter affecting the proper and timely conduct or conclusion of the meeting of experts or preparation of the joint report. Example for paragraph (b) — informing the active parties of a delay in gathering data for use in the joint report
(a) all of the experts agree to the giving of the notice or, if the experts do not agree, the notice states the basis of the disagreement between the experts; and
(b) a copy of the notice is given to all the experts and the other active parties at the same time as the notice is given to the active party.
(a) the response is in writing; and
(b) before the response is made, a copy of the response is given to all the other active parties at the same time; and
(c) the response is made— (i) not more than 10 business days after the notice is given to the recipient; and (ii) not less than 5 business days, or the shorter period agreed to by the active parties, after the copy of the response is given to the other active parties; and
(i) not more than 10 business days after the notice is given to the recipient; and
(ii) not less than 5 business days, or the shorter period agreed to by the active parties, after the copy of the response is given to the other active parties; and
(d) a copy of the response is given to all the other experts at the same time as the response is made.
(i) not more than 10 business days after the notice is given to the recipient; and
(ii) not less than 5 business days, or the shorter period agreed to by the active parties, after the copy of the response is given to the other active parties; and
(a) the conduct report is given not more than 2 business days after the request is received by the experts; and
(b) all of the experts agree to the giving of the conduct report or, if the experts do not agree, the conduct report states the basis of the disagreement between the experts; and
(c) the conduct report is in writing; and
(d) a copy of the conduct report is given to all the other active parties at the same time as the conduct report is given to the requesting party.
sec.29
Admissions made at meeting of experts
sec.29 Admissions made at meeting of experts
Evidence of anything done or said, or an admission made, at a meeting of experts is admissible at the hearing of the P&E Court proceeding, at the hearing of another P&E Court proceeding or in another civil proceeding only if all the active parties to the proceeding agree.
Subrule (1) does not apply to a joint report prepared in relation to a meeting of experts.
In this rule—
civil proceeding does not include a civil proceeding founded on fraud alleged to be connected with, or to have happened during, the meeting of experts.
(sec.29-ssec.1) Evidence of anything done or said, or an admission made, at a meeting of experts is admissible at the hearing of the P&E Court proceeding, at the hearing of another P&E Court proceeding or in another civil proceeding only if all the active parties to the proceeding agree.
(sec.29-ssec.2) Subrule (1) does not apply to a joint report prepared in relation to a meeting of experts.
(sec.29-ssec.3) In this rule— civil proceeding does not include a civil proceeding founded on fraud alleged to be connected with, or to have happened during, the meeting of experts.
sec.30
P&E Court orders and directions prevail
sec.30 P&E Court orders and directions prevail
If, in a P&E Court proceeding, the P&E Court makes an order or gives directions inconsistent with a provision of this division, the order or directions prevail to the extent of the inconsistency.
pt.3-div.4
Giving of evidence by experts and related matters
Giving of evidence by experts and related matters
sec.31
Application of division
sec.31 Application of division
This division applies if an expert is appointed in relation to a P&E Court proceeding.
r 31 sub 2022 SL No. 18 s 10
sec.32
Duty of active parties
sec.32 Duty of active parties
As soon as practicable after the expert is appointed, a copy of the code of conduct must be given to the expert by—
the active party who appointed the expert in relation to the P&E Court proceeding; or
if the expert was appointed in relation to the P&E Court proceeding by 2 or more active parties—the active parties or 1 of them as they may agree.
An active party to the P&E Court proceeding must not give instructions, or allow instructions to be given, to the expert to adopt or reject a particular opinion.
r 32 sub 2022 SL No. 18 s 10
(sec.32-ssec.1) As soon as practicable after the expert is appointed, a copy of the code of conduct must be given to the expert by— the active party who appointed the expert in relation to the P&E Court proceeding; or if the expert was appointed in relation to the P&E Court proceeding by 2 or more active parties—the active parties or 1 of them as they may agree.
(sec.32-ssec.2) An active party to the P&E Court proceeding must not give instructions, or allow instructions to be given, to the expert to adopt or reject a particular opinion.
(a) the active party who appointed the expert in relation to the P&E Court proceeding; or
(b) if the expert was appointed in relation to the P&E Court proceeding by 2 or more active parties—the active parties or 1 of them as they may agree.
sec.33
Duty of expert
sec.33 Duty of expert
The expert has a duty to assist the P&E Court.
The expert—
is not an advocate for an active party to the P&E Court proceeding; and
must not accept instructions from any person to adopt or reject a particular opinion.
The expert must comply with the requirements under the code of conduct.
However, subrule (3) does not limit any provision of this part.
The expert’s duties under this rule override any obligation the expert may have to—
any active party to the P&E Court proceeding; or
any person who is liable for the expert’s fees or expenses.
r 33 sub 2022 SL No. 18 s 10
(sec.33-ssec.1) The expert has a duty to assist the P&E Court.
(sec.33-ssec.2) The expert— is not an advocate for an active party to the P&E Court proceeding; and must not accept instructions from any person to adopt or reject a particular opinion.
(sec.33-ssec.3) The expert must comply with the requirements under the code of conduct.
(sec.33-ssec.4) However, subrule (3) does not limit any provision of this part.
(sec.33-ssec.5) The expert’s duties under this rule override any obligation the expert may have to— any active party to the P&E Court proceeding; or any person who is liable for the expert’s fees or expenses.
(a) is not an advocate for an active party to the P&E Court proceeding; and
(b) must not accept instructions from any person to adopt or reject a particular opinion.
(a) any active party to the P&E Court proceeding; or
(b) any person who is liable for the expert’s fees or expenses.
sec.34
Expert must prepare report
sec.34 Expert must prepare report
The expert must prepare a report for the hearing of the P&E Court proceeding.
If the expert has taken part in a meeting of experts for the P&E Court proceeding—
a joint report prepared in relation to the meeting is taken to be the expert’s report for the hearing of the proceeding; but
the expert may prepare a separate report in relation to any issue of disagreement recorded in the joint report.
However, the separate report must not, without the P&E Court’s leave, raise a new matter not already mentioned in the joint report.
r 34 sub 2022 SL No. 18 s 10
(sec.34-ssec.1) The expert must prepare a report for the hearing of the P&E Court proceeding.
(sec.34-ssec.2) If the expert has taken part in a meeting of experts for the P&E Court proceeding— a joint report prepared in relation to the meeting is taken to be the expert’s report for the hearing of the proceeding; but the expert may prepare a separate report in relation to any issue of disagreement recorded in the joint report.
(sec.34-ssec.3) However, the separate report must not, without the P&E Court’s leave, raise a new matter not already mentioned in the joint report.
(a) a joint report prepared in relation to the meeting is taken to be the expert’s report for the hearing of the proceeding; but
(b) the expert may prepare a separate report in relation to any issue of disagreement recorded in the joint report.
sec.35
Requirements for separate report
sec.35 Requirements for separate report
A separate report prepared by the expert must be addressed to the P&E Court and signed by the expert.
The separate report must include the following information—
the expert’s qualifications;
all material facts, whether written or oral, on which the report is based;
the expert’s reasons for each opinion expressed in the report;
references to any literature or other material relied on by the expert to prepare the report;
for any inspection, examination or experiment conducted, initiated, or relied on by the expert to prepare the report—
a description of what was done; and
whether the inspection, examination or experiment was done by the expert or under the expert’s supervision; and
the name and qualifications of any other person involved; and
the result;
if there is a range of opinion on matters dealt with in the report—a summary of the range of opinion, and the reasons why the expert adopted a particular opinion;
if the expert believes the report may be incomplete or inaccurate without a qualification—the qualification;
a summary of the conclusions reached by the expert;
a statement about whether access to any readily ascertainable additional facts would assist the expert in reaching a more reliable conclusion.
However, subrule (2) does not apply to the extent the information is already included in a joint report prepared for the P&E Court proceeding.
If the expert believes an opinion expressed in the separate report is not a concluded opinion, the report must state, where the opinion is expressed, the reason for the expert’s belief.
insufficient research
insufficient data
The expert must confirm in the separate report that—
the expert has read, and agrees to be bound by, the code of conduct; and
the factual matters stated in the report are, as far as the expert knows, true; and
the expert has made all inquiries considered appropriate; and
the opinions stated in the report are genuinely held by the expert; and
the report contains reference to all matters the expert considers significant; and
the expert understands the expert’s duty to the P&E Court and has complied with the duty.
r 35 sub 2022 SL No. 18 s 10
(sec.35-ssec.1) A separate report prepared by the expert must be addressed to the P&E Court and signed by the expert.
(sec.35-ssec.2) The separate report must include the following information— the expert’s qualifications; all material facts, whether written or oral, on which the report is based; the expert’s reasons for each opinion expressed in the report; references to any literature or other material relied on by the expert to prepare the report; for any inspection, examination or experiment conducted, initiated, or relied on by the expert to prepare the report— a description of what was done; and whether the inspection, examination or experiment was done by the expert or under the expert’s supervision; and the name and qualifications of any other person involved; and the result; if there is a range of opinion on matters dealt with in the report—a summary of the range of opinion, and the reasons why the expert adopted a particular opinion; if the expert believes the report may be incomplete or inaccurate without a qualification—the qualification; a summary of the conclusions reached by the expert; a statement about whether access to any readily ascertainable additional facts would assist the expert in reaching a more reliable conclusion.
(sec.35-ssec.3) However, subrule (2) does not apply to the extent the information is already included in a joint report prepared for the P&E Court proceeding.
(sec.35-ssec.4) If the expert believes an opinion expressed in the separate report is not a concluded opinion, the report must state, where the opinion is expressed, the reason for the expert’s belief. insufficient research insufficient data
(sec.35-ssec.5) The expert must confirm in the separate report that— the expert has read, and agrees to be bound by, the code of conduct; and the factual matters stated in the report are, as far as the expert knows, true; and the expert has made all inquiries considered appropriate; and the opinions stated in the report are genuinely held by the expert; and the report contains reference to all matters the expert considers significant; and the expert understands the expert’s duty to the P&E Court and has complied with the duty.
(a) the expert’s qualifications;
(b) all material facts, whether written or oral, on which the report is based;
(c) the expert’s reasons for each opinion expressed in the report;
(d) references to any literature or other material relied on by the expert to prepare the report;
(e) for any inspection, examination or experiment conducted, initiated, or relied on by the expert to prepare the report— (i) a description of what was done; and (ii) whether the inspection, examination or experiment was done by the expert or under the expert’s supervision; and (iii) the name and qualifications of any other person involved; and (iv) the result;
(i) a description of what was done; and
(ii) whether the inspection, examination or experiment was done by the expert or under the expert’s supervision; and
(iii) the name and qualifications of any other person involved; and
(iv) the result;
(f) if there is a range of opinion on matters dealt with in the report—a summary of the range of opinion, and the reasons why the expert adopted a particular opinion;
(g) if the expert believes the report may be incomplete or inaccurate without a qualification—the qualification;
(h) a summary of the conclusions reached by the expert;
(i) a statement about whether access to any readily ascertainable additional facts would assist the expert in reaching a more reliable conclusion.
(i) a description of what was done; and
(ii) whether the inspection, examination or experiment was done by the expert or under the expert’s supervision; and
(iii) the name and qualifications of any other person involved; and
(iv) the result;
• insufficient research
• insufficient data
(a) the expert has read, and agrees to be bound by, the code of conduct; and
(b) the factual matters stated in the report are, as far as the expert knows, true; and
(c) the expert has made all inquiries considered appropriate; and
(d) the opinions stated in the report are genuinely held by the expert; and
(e) the report contains reference to all matters the expert considers significant; and
(f) the expert understands the expert’s duty to the P&E Court and has complied with the duty.
sec.35A
Serving separate report
sec.35A Serving separate report
An active party to the P&E Court proceeding intending to call evidence by the expert must, as ordered or directed by the P&E Court, serve on each other active party to the proceeding a copy of any separate report prepared by the expert for the proceeding.
r 35A ins 2022 SL No. 18 s 10
sec.35B
Supplementary report following change of opinion
sec.35B Supplementary report following change of opinion
Subrule (2) applies if the expert changes, in a material way, an opinion included in a report prepared for the P&E Court proceeding (an earlier report ).
Unless the expert knows the P&E Court proceeding has ended, the expert must, as soon as practicable after the change of opinion, give written notice of the change of opinion, and the reason for the change, to the active party who appointed the expert.
If the earlier report has been given under rule 28 or served under this division, the active party who appointed the expert must, as soon as practicable after receiving the notice—
obtain a further report from the expert (a supplementary report ) that—
states the change of opinion and the reason for the change; and
otherwise complies with rule 35 ; and
serve a copy of the supplementary report on each other active party to the P&E Court proceeding; and
apply to the P&E Court for an order or directions about the supplementary report.
For subrule (3) (a) (ii) , the supplementary report may, to the extent necessary, comply with rule 35 by incorporating by reference parts of the earlier report.
The expert may be called to give evidence only with the P&E Court’s leave.
r 35B ins 2022 SL No. 18 s 10
(sec.35B-ssec.1) Subrule (2) applies if the expert changes, in a material way, an opinion included in a report prepared for the P&E Court proceeding (an earlier report ).
(sec.35B-ssec.2) Unless the expert knows the P&E Court proceeding has ended, the expert must, as soon as practicable after the change of opinion, give written notice of the change of opinion, and the reason for the change, to the active party who appointed the expert.
(sec.35B-ssec.3) If the earlier report has been given under rule 28 or served under this division, the active party who appointed the expert must, as soon as practicable after receiving the notice— obtain a further report from the expert (a supplementary report ) that— states the change of opinion and the reason for the change; and otherwise complies with rule 35 ; and serve a copy of the supplementary report on each other active party to the P&E Court proceeding; and apply to the P&E Court for an order or directions about the supplementary report.
(sec.35B-ssec.4) For subrule (3) (a) (ii) , the supplementary report may, to the extent necessary, comply with rule 35 by incorporating by reference parts of the earlier report.
(sec.35B-ssec.5) The expert may be called to give evidence only with the P&E Court’s leave.
(a) obtain a further report from the expert (a supplementary report ) that— (i) states the change of opinion and the reason for the change; and (ii) otherwise complies with rule 35 ; and
(i) states the change of opinion and the reason for the change; and
(ii) otherwise complies with rule 35 ; and
(b) serve a copy of the supplementary report on each other active party to the P&E Court proceeding; and
(c) apply to the P&E Court for an order or directions about the supplementary report.
(i) states the change of opinion and the reason for the change; and
(ii) otherwise complies with rule 35 ; and
sec.35C
Matters contained in report not to be repeated
sec.35C Matters contained in report not to be repeated
The expert must not do either of the following in examination-in-chief without the P&E Court’s leave—
repeat or expand on matters contained in a report prepared by the expert;
introduce new material.
r 35C ins 2022 SL No. 18 s 10
(a) repeat or expand on matters contained in a report prepared by the expert;
(b) introduce new material.
sec.36
Evidence from only 1 expert may be called
sec.36 Evidence from only 1 expert may be called
Other than with the P&E Court’s leave, an active party to a P&E Court proceeding, at any hearing of the proceeding, may call evidence from only 1 expert for each area of expertise dealt with in the hearing.
pt.3-div.5
Payment of witnesses
Payment of witnesses
sec.37
Payment of witnesses
sec.37 Payment of witnesses
Every witness summoned is entitled to be paid reasonable expenses by the active party requiring the attendance of the witness.
pt.4
Applications in P&E Court proceedings
Applications in P&E Court proceedings
sec.38
Content of application
sec.38 Content of application
An application in a P&E Court proceeding must—
be made in an approved form; and
state all of the following—
the day the application is to be heard;
an estimate of time for the hearing of the application;
the relief sought in the application;
if the application is made by an entity that is not a party to the proceeding in which the application is made—the details required under rule 10 to be stated on an originating process unless the details have already been supplied on a document filed in the proceeding; and
name as respondent any party to the proceeding whose interests may be affected by the granting of the relief sought in the application.
(a) be made in an approved form; and
(b) state all of the following— (i) the day the application is to be heard; (ii) an estimate of time for the hearing of the application; (iii) the relief sought in the application; (iv) if the application is made by an entity that is not a party to the proceeding in which the application is made—the details required under rule 10 to be stated on an originating process unless the details have already been supplied on a document filed in the proceeding; and
(i) the day the application is to be heard;
(ii) an estimate of time for the hearing of the application;
(iii) the relief sought in the application;
(iv) if the application is made by an entity that is not a party to the proceeding in which the application is made—the details required under rule 10 to be stated on an originating process unless the details have already been supplied on a document filed in the proceeding; and
(c) name as respondent any party to the proceeding whose interests may be affected by the granting of the relief sought in the application.
(i) the day the application is to be heard;
(ii) an estimate of time for the hearing of the application;
(iii) the relief sought in the application;
(iv) if the application is made by an entity that is not a party to the proceeding in which the application is made—the details required under rule 10 to be stated on an originating process unless the details have already been supplied on a document filed in the proceeding; and
sec.39
Serving application and supporting affidavit
sec.39 Serving application and supporting affidavit
An entity making an application in a P&E Court proceeding must—
file the application and any affidavit to be relied on by the applicant at the hearing of the application (a supporting affidavit ); and
serve a copy of the application and any supporting affidavit on each respondent named in the application at least 2 business days before the day the application is to be heard.
However, if the P&E Court considers it appropriate having regard to the circumstances in a particular case, the court may order that subrule (1) does not apply.
(sec.39-ssec.1) An entity making an application in a P&E Court proceeding must— file the application and any affidavit to be relied on by the applicant at the hearing of the application (a supporting affidavit ); and serve a copy of the application and any supporting affidavit on each respondent named in the application at least 2 business days before the day the application is to be heard.
(sec.39-ssec.2) However, if the P&E Court considers it appropriate having regard to the circumstances in a particular case, the court may order that subrule (1) does not apply.
(a) file the application and any affidavit to be relied on by the applicant at the hearing of the application (a supporting affidavit ); and
(b) serve a copy of the application and any supporting affidavit on each respondent named in the application at least 2 business days before the day the application is to be heard.
sec.40
Hearing application
sec.40 Hearing application
Other than with the P&E Court’s leave, the application must be heard and decided on affidavit evidence.
pt.5
ADR processes and related matters
ADR processes and related matters
sec.41
Definitions for part
sec.41 Definitions for part
In this part—
case management conference means a conference at which the active parties to a P&E Court proceeding confer about the way to conduct the proceeding to ensure the resolution of the issues in dispute in the proceeding is just, expeditious and conducted at a minimum of expense.
without prejudice conference means a conference at which the active parties to a P&E Court proceeding confer to narrow and resolve the issues in dispute in the proceeding.
(sec.41-ssec) In this part— case management conference means a conference at which the active parties to a P&E Court proceeding confer about the way to conduct the proceeding to ensure the resolution of the issues in dispute in the proceeding is just, expeditious and conducted at a minimum of expense. without prejudice conference means a conference at which the active parties to a P&E Court proceeding confer to narrow and resolve the issues in dispute in the proceeding.
sec.42
References to active party
sec.42 References to active party
In this part, a reference to an active party to a P&E Court proceeding includes a reference to the active party’s lawyer or agent.
sec.43
Case management conference
sec.43 Case management conference
An ADR registrar must, if directed by the P&E Court, convene and chair a case management conference for the proceeding.
Also, an ADR registrar may, if asked by all the active parties to a P&E Court proceeding, convene and chair a case management conference for the proceeding.
If a case management conference is convened under subrule (1) or (2) , each active party must attend.
(sec.43-ssec.1) An ADR registrar must, if directed by the P&E Court, convene and chair a case management conference for the proceeding.
(sec.43-ssec.2) Also, an ADR registrar may, if asked by all the active parties to a P&E Court proceeding, convene and chair a case management conference for the proceeding.
(sec.43-ssec.3) If a case management conference is convened under subrule (1) or (2) , each active party must attend.
sec.44
Listing P&E Court proceeding for review
sec.44 Listing P&E Court proceeding for review
An ADR registrar may, on the ADR registrar’s own initiative, list a P&E Court proceeding for review or further review by a judge at a time the judge directs.
sec.45
Without prejudice conference
sec.45 Without prejudice conference
An ADR registrar or mediator must, if directed by the P&E Court, convene and chair a without prejudice conference for the proceeding.
Also, an ADR registrar or mediator may, if asked by all the active parties to a P&E Court proceeding, convene and chair a without prejudice conference for the proceeding.
If a without prejudice conference is convened under subrule (1) or (2) —
each active party must attend the conference; and
any other person directed by the P&E Court must attend the conference; and
any other person may attend the conference if all the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding agree.
An expert may attend if all the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding agree.
In this rule, a reference to an active party to a P&E Court proceeding includes a reference to a person who—
is familiar with the substance of the issues in dispute in the proceeding; and
is either—
authorised by the active party to settle the issues; or
if attendance by a person with authority to settle the issues is impractical—authorised to make a recommendation to the active party about settling the issues.
r 45 amd 2019 SL No. 67 s 5
(sec.45-ssec.1) An ADR registrar or mediator must, if directed by the P&E Court, convene and chair a without prejudice conference for the proceeding.
(sec.45-ssec.2) Also, an ADR registrar or mediator may, if asked by all the active parties to a P&E Court proceeding, convene and chair a without prejudice conference for the proceeding.
(sec.45-ssec.3) If a without prejudice conference is convened under subrule (1) or (2) — each active party must attend the conference; and any other person directed by the P&E Court must attend the conference; and any other person may attend the conference if all the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding agree. An expert may attend if all the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding agree.
(sec.45-ssec.4) In this rule, a reference to an active party to a P&E Court proceeding includes a reference to a person who— is familiar with the substance of the issues in dispute in the proceeding; and is either— authorised by the active party to settle the issues; or if attendance by a person with authority to settle the issues is impractical—authorised to make a recommendation to the active party about settling the issues.
(a) each active party must attend the conference; and
(b) any other person directed by the P&E Court must attend the conference; and
(c) any other person may attend the conference if all the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding agree. Example for paragraph (c) — An expert may attend if all the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding agree.
(a) is familiar with the substance of the issues in dispute in the proceeding; and
(b) is either— (i) authorised by the active party to settle the issues; or (ii) if attendance by a person with authority to settle the issues is impractical—authorised to make a recommendation to the active party about settling the issues.
(i) authorised by the active party to settle the issues; or
(ii) if attendance by a person with authority to settle the issues is impractical—authorised to make a recommendation to the active party about settling the issues.
(i) authorised by the active party to settle the issues; or
(ii) if attendance by a person with authority to settle the issues is impractical—authorised to make a recommendation to the active party about settling the issues.
sec.45A
Mediation
sec.45A Mediation
An ADR registrar or mediator must, if directed by the P&E Court, convene and chair a mediation for a P&E Court proceeding.
Also, an ADR registrar or mediator may, if asked by all the active parties to a P&E Court proceeding, convene and chair a mediation for the proceeding.
If a mediation is convened under subrule (1) or (2) for a P&E Court proceeding—
each active party to the proceeding must attend the mediation; and
any other person directed by the P&E Court must attend the mediation; and
any other person may attend the mediation if all the active parties to the proceeding agree.
In this rule, a reference to an active party to a P&E Court proceeding includes a reference to a person who—
is familiar with the substance of the issues in dispute in the proceeding; and
is either—
authorised by the active party to settle the issues; or
if attendance by a person with authority to settle the issues is impractical—authorised to make a recommendation to the active party about settling the issues.
r 45A ins 2019 SL No. 67 s 6
(sec.45A-ssec.1) An ADR registrar or mediator must, if directed by the P&E Court, convene and chair a mediation for a P&E Court proceeding.
(sec.45A-ssec.2) Also, an ADR registrar or mediator may, if asked by all the active parties to a P&E Court proceeding, convene and chair a mediation for the proceeding.
(sec.45A-ssec.3) If a mediation is convened under subrule (1) or (2) for a P&E Court proceeding— each active party to the proceeding must attend the mediation; and any other person directed by the P&E Court must attend the mediation; and any other person may attend the mediation if all the active parties to the proceeding agree.
(sec.45A-ssec.4) In this rule, a reference to an active party to a P&E Court proceeding includes a reference to a person who— is familiar with the substance of the issues in dispute in the proceeding; and is either— authorised by the active party to settle the issues; or if attendance by a person with authority to settle the issues is impractical—authorised to make a recommendation to the active party about settling the issues.
(a) each active party to the proceeding must attend the mediation; and
(b) any other person directed by the P&E Court must attend the mediation; and
(c) any other person may attend the mediation if all the active parties to the proceeding agree.
(a) is familiar with the substance of the issues in dispute in the proceeding; and
(b) is either— (i) authorised by the active party to settle the issues; or (ii) if attendance by a person with authority to settle the issues is impractical—authorised to make a recommendation to the active party about settling the issues.
(i) authorised by the active party to settle the issues; or
(ii) if attendance by a person with authority to settle the issues is impractical—authorised to make a recommendation to the active party about settling the issues.
(i) authorised by the active party to settle the issues; or
(ii) if attendance by a person with authority to settle the issues is impractical—authorised to make a recommendation to the active party about settling the issues.
sec.46
Admissions at conference
sec.46 Admissions at conference
Evidence of anything done or said, or an admission made, at a conference for a P&E Court proceeding is inadmissible at the hearing of the proceeding, at the hearing of another P&E Court proceeding or in another civil proceeding.
Subrule (1) does not apply to evidence of an agreement reached at a conference.
In this rule—
civil proceeding does not include a civil proceeding founded on fraud alleged to be connected with, or to have happened during, the conference.
conference means a case management conference, without prejudice conference or mediation.
r 46 amd 2019 SL No. 67 s 7
(sec.46-ssec.1) Evidence of anything done or said, or an admission made, at a conference for a P&E Court proceeding is inadmissible at the hearing of the proceeding, at the hearing of another P&E Court proceeding or in another civil proceeding.
(sec.46-ssec.2) Subrule (1) does not apply to evidence of an agreement reached at a conference.
(sec.46-ssec.3) In this rule— civil proceeding does not include a civil proceeding founded on fraud alleged to be connected with, or to have happened during, the conference. conference means a case management conference, without prejudice conference or mediation.
pt.5A
Costs
Costs
sec.46A
Costs of P&E Court proceedings
sec.46A Costs of P&E Court proceedings
The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 , rules 681 , 692 , 695 and 698 do not apply in relation to a P&E Court proceeding.
r 46A ins 2022 SL No. 18 s 12
pt.6
Appeals to Court of Appeal
Appeals to Court of Appeal
sec.47
Documents to be given to P&E Court’s principal registrar
sec.47 Documents to be given to P&E Court’s principal registrar
A party to a P&E Court proceeding who applies, under section 64 of the Act , for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal against a decision of the P&E Court must give the P&E Court’s principal registrar a copy of the following documents—
the application for leave to appeal;
the Court of Appeal’s decision on the application for leave to appeal;
if the leave is granted and the appeal is started—
the notice of appeal; and
the Court of Appeal’s decision on the appeal.
The P&E Court’s principal registrar must keep the copies with the documents kept by the principal registrar for the P&E Court proceeding in the P&E Court.
(sec.47-ssec.1) A party to a P&E Court proceeding who applies, under section 64 of the Act , for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal against a decision of the P&E Court must give the P&E Court’s principal registrar a copy of the following documents— the application for leave to appeal; the Court of Appeal’s decision on the application for leave to appeal; if the leave is granted and the appeal is started— the notice of appeal; and the Court of Appeal’s decision on the appeal.
(sec.47-ssec.2) The P&E Court’s principal registrar must keep the copies with the documents kept by the principal registrar for the P&E Court proceeding in the P&E Court.
(a) the application for leave to appeal;
(b) the Court of Appeal’s decision on the application for leave to appeal;
(c) if the leave is granted and the appeal is started— (i) the notice of appeal; and (ii) the Court of Appeal’s decision on the appeal.
(i) the notice of appeal; and
(ii) the Court of Appeal’s decision on the appeal.
(i) the notice of appeal; and
(ii) the Court of Appeal’s decision on the appeal.
pt.6A
Copying and inspection of filed documents
Copying and inspection of filed documents
sec.47A
Relationship with Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999
sec.47A Relationship with Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999
The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 , chapter 22 , part 1 , division 6 does not apply in relation to a document filed in a P&E Court proceeding.
r 47A ins 2024 SL No. 5 s 4
sec.47B
Copies of documents
sec.47B Copies of documents
A person may ask a registrar for a copy or certified copy of a document filed in a P&E Court proceeding.
The person making the request must pay any prescribed fee for the copy or certified copy of the document.
Subject to any court order restricting access to the file or document, the registrar must give the person a copy or certified copy of the document as the case may be.
The copy of the document must have the seal and the word ‘copy’ stamped on it.
r 47B ins 2024 SL No. 5 s 4
(sec.47B-ssec.1) A person may ask a registrar for a copy or certified copy of a document filed in a P&E Court proceeding.
(sec.47B-ssec.2) The person making the request must pay any prescribed fee for the copy or certified copy of the document.
(sec.47B-ssec.3) Subject to any court order restricting access to the file or document, the registrar must give the person a copy or certified copy of the document as the case may be.
(sec.47B-ssec.4) The copy of the document must have the seal and the word ‘copy’ stamped on it.
sec.47C
Searches for documents
sec.47C Searches for documents
A person may ask a registrar to search for, and allow the person to inspect, a document filed in a P&E Court proceeding.
If the person making the request is not a party, or a representative of a party, to the proceeding in which the document was filed, the person must pay any prescribed fee for the search or inspection.
Subject to any court order restricting access to the file or document, or the file or document being required for the court’s use, the registrar must comply with the request, unless there is not enough information for the registrar to be able to comply with the request.
The registrar may, on payment of the prescribed fee, issue a certificate of the result of the search for the document.
r 47C ins 2024 SL No. 5 s 4
(sec.47C-ssec.1) A person may ask a registrar to search for, and allow the person to inspect, a document filed in a P&E Court proceeding.
(sec.47C-ssec.2) If the person making the request is not a party, or a representative of a party, to the proceeding in which the document was filed, the person must pay any prescribed fee for the search or inspection.
(sec.47C-ssec.3) Subject to any court order restricting access to the file or document, or the file or document being required for the court’s use, the registrar must comply with the request, unless there is not enough information for the registrar to be able to comply with the request.
(sec.47C-ssec.4) The registrar may, on payment of the prescribed fee, issue a certificate of the result of the search for the document.
pt.7
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous
sec.48
Hearing appeals together
sec.48 Hearing appeals together
The P&E Court may hear 2 or more appeals together.
sec.49
Where documents to be filed
sec.49 Where documents to be filed
An entry of appearance or notice of election may be filed—
at the place the originating process to which the entry of appearance or notice of election relates was filed; or
See also rule 7 .
otherwise—at the place the P&E Court file for the P&E Court proceeding is kept.
All other documents for a P&E Court proceeding must be filed at the place the P&E Court file for the proceeding is kept.
(sec.49-ssec.1) An entry of appearance or notice of election may be filed— at the place the originating process to which the entry of appearance or notice of election relates was filed; or See also rule 7 . otherwise—at the place the P&E Court file for the P&E Court proceeding is kept.
(sec.49-ssec.2) All other documents for a P&E Court proceeding must be filed at the place the P&E Court file for the proceeding is kept.
(a) at the place the originating process to which the entry of appearance or notice of election relates was filed; or Note— See also rule 7 .
(b) otherwise—at the place the P&E Court file for the P&E Court proceeding is kept.
sec.50
Document format
sec.50 Document format
Documents to be filed in a P&E Court proceeding must—
be consecutively numbered on each page; and
be divided into consecutively numbered paragraphs and, if necessary, subparagraphs, each containing, as far as practicable, a separate allegation or topic about the proceeding.
(a) be consecutively numbered on each page; and
(b) be divided into consecutively numbered paragraphs and, if necessary, subparagraphs, each containing, as far as practicable, a separate allegation or topic about the proceeding.
pt.8
Transitional provision
Transitional provision
sec.51
References to Planning and Environment Court Rules 2010
sec.51 References to Planning and Environment Court Rules 2010
In a document, a reference to the Planning and Environment Court Rules 2010 may, if the context permits, be taken to be a reference to these rules.
sch.1-pt.1
Preliminary
Preliminary
sch.1-sec.1
Purpose of code
sch.1-sec.1 Purpose of code
The purpose of this code of conduct is—
to state an expert’s obligations under the following provisions of part 3 of these rules—
rule 28 ;
rule 28A (1) to (3) and (6) ;
rule 33 (1) , (2) and (5) ;
rule 34 ;
rule 35 ;
rule 35B (1) to (4) ; and
otherwise to state an expert’s obligations in relation to an order made, or a direction given, by the P&E Court.
In this code of conduct, the information included in square brackets after a rule heading is a reference to the comparable rule under part 3 of these rules.
The brackets and information do not form part of these rules.
(sch.1-sec.1-ssec.1) The purpose of this code of conduct is— to state an expert’s obligations under the following provisions of part 3 of these rules— rule 28 ; rule 28A (1) to (3) and (6) ; rule 33 (1) , (2) and (5) ; rule 34 ; rule 35 ; rule 35B (1) to (4) ; and otherwise to state an expert’s obligations in relation to an order made, or a direction given, by the P&E Court.
(sch.1-sec.1-ssec.2) In this code of conduct, the information included in square brackets after a rule heading is a reference to the comparable rule under part 3 of these rules.
(sch.1-sec.1-ssec.3) The brackets and information do not form part of these rules.
(a) to state an expert’s obligations under the following provisions of part 3 of these rules— (i) rule 28 ; (ii) rule 28A (1) to (3) and (6) ; (iii) rule 33 (1) , (2) and (5) ; (iv) rule 34 ; (v) rule 35 ; (vi) rule 35B (1) to (4) ; and
(i) rule 28 ;
(ii) rule 28A (1) to (3) and (6) ;
(iii) rule 33 (1) , (2) and (5) ;
(iv) rule 34 ;
(v) rule 35 ;
(vi) rule 35B (1) to (4) ; and
(b) otherwise to state an expert’s obligations in relation to an order made, or a direction given, by the P&E Court.
(i) rule 28 ;
(ii) rule 28A (1) to (3) and (6) ;
(iii) rule 33 (1) , (2) and (5) ;
(iv) rule 34 ;
(v) rule 35 ;
(vi) rule 35B (1) to (4) ; and
sch.1-sec.2
Application of code
sch.1-sec.2 Application of code
This code of conduct applies to an expert who is appointed to give opinion evidence, whether orally or in a report, in a P&E Court proceeding.
Rule 33 (3) of these rules requires the expert to comply with the requirements under this code of conduct.
sch.1-sec.3
Interpretation
sch.1-sec.3 Interpretation
Words and expressions used in part 3 of these rules have the same meaning in this code of conduct as they have in that part.
sch.1-pt.2
Duty to comply with orders and directions
Duty to comply with orders and directions
sch.1-sec.4
Duty to comply with P&E Court’s orders and directions
sch.1-sec.4 Duty to comply with P&E Court’s orders and directions
The expert must comply with an order made, or a direction given, by the P&E Court.
Without limiting subrule (1) , if the P&E Court makes an order, or gives a direction, requiring 2 or more experts to hold a meeting of experts, the experts must hold the meeting of experts, and prepare a joint report, in compliance with the order or direction.
(sch.1-sec.4-ssec.1) The expert must comply with an order made, or a direction given, by the P&E Court.
(sch.1-sec.4-ssec.2) Without limiting subrule (1) , if the P&E Court makes an order, or gives a direction, requiring 2 or more experts to hold a meeting of experts, the experts must hold the meeting of experts, and prepare a joint report, in compliance with the order or direction.
sch.1-pt.3
Meetings of experts and joint reports
Meetings of experts and joint reports
sch.1-sec.5
Application of part
sch.1-sec.5 Application of part
This part applies if the P&E Court makes an order, or gives a direction, requiring 2 or more experts to hold a meeting of experts.
sch.1-sec.6
Meeting of experts and joint report [r 28]
sch.1-sec.6 Meeting of experts and joint report [r 28]
The experts attending a meeting of experts must jointly prepare a report in relation to the meeting (a joint report ) that states—
the matters, if any, on which the experts agree; and
the matters, if any, on which the experts disagree and the reasons for any disagreement.
In holding the meeting of experts, and preparing the joint report, the experts—
must exercise independent judgement; and
must endeavour to reach an agreement on any matter on which they disagree; and
must not act on any instruction or request to withhold or avoid reaching an agreement.
Unless the P&E Court orders or directs otherwise, the experts must—
hold the meeting of experts in the absence of the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding; and
prepare the joint report without reference to, or instructions from, the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding.
Rule 24 of these rules provides that, in part 3 of these rules, a reference to an active party to a P&E Court proceeding includes a reference to the active party’s lawyer or agent.
The joint report must confirm that—
each of the experts has read, and agrees to be bound by, the code of conduct; and
the factual matters stated in the report are, as far as each of the experts knows, true; and
each of the experts has made all inquiries considered appropriate; and
the opinions stated in the report are genuinely held by each of the experts; and
the report contains reference to all matters each of the experts considers significant; and
each of the experts understands the expert’s duty to the P&E Court and has complied with the duty.
The experts must give the joint report to the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding as soon as practicable after the meeting of experts has concluded and, in any case, as ordered or directed by the P&E Court.
This rule is subject to rule 7 .
(sch.1-sec.6-ssec.1) The experts attending a meeting of experts must jointly prepare a report in relation to the meeting (a joint report ) that states— the matters, if any, on which the experts agree; and the matters, if any, on which the experts disagree and the reasons for any disagreement.
(sch.1-sec.6-ssec.2) In holding the meeting of experts, and preparing the joint report, the experts— must exercise independent judgement; and must endeavour to reach an agreement on any matter on which they disagree; and must not act on any instruction or request to withhold or avoid reaching an agreement.
(sch.1-sec.6-ssec.3) Unless the P&E Court orders or directs otherwise, the experts must— hold the meeting of experts in the absence of the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding; and prepare the joint report without reference to, or instructions from, the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding. Rule 24 of these rules provides that, in part 3 of these rules, a reference to an active party to a P&E Court proceeding includes a reference to the active party’s lawyer or agent.
(sch.1-sec.6-ssec.4) The joint report must confirm that— each of the experts has read, and agrees to be bound by, the code of conduct; and the factual matters stated in the report are, as far as each of the experts knows, true; and each of the experts has made all inquiries considered appropriate; and the opinions stated in the report are genuinely held by each of the experts; and the report contains reference to all matters each of the experts considers significant; and each of the experts understands the expert’s duty to the P&E Court and has complied with the duty.
(sch.1-sec.6-ssec.5) The experts must give the joint report to the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding as soon as practicable after the meeting of experts has concluded and, in any case, as ordered or directed by the P&E Court.
(sch.1-sec.6-ssec.6) This rule is subject to rule 7 .
(a) the matters, if any, on which the experts agree; and
(b) the matters, if any, on which the experts disagree and the reasons for any disagreement.
(a) must exercise independent judgement; and
(b) must endeavour to reach an agreement on any matter on which they disagree; and
(c) must not act on any instruction or request to withhold or avoid reaching an agreement.
(a) hold the meeting of experts in the absence of the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding; and
(b) prepare the joint report without reference to, or instructions from, the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding. Note— Rule 24 of these rules provides that, in part 3 of these rules, a reference to an active party to a P&E Court proceeding includes a reference to the active party’s lawyer or agent.
(a) each of the experts has read, and agrees to be bound by, the code of conduct; and
(b) the factual matters stated in the report are, as far as each of the experts knows, true; and
(c) each of the experts has made all inquiries considered appropriate; and
(d) the opinions stated in the report are genuinely held by each of the experts; and
(e) the report contains reference to all matters each of the experts considers significant; and
(f) each of the experts understands the expert’s duty to the P&E Court and has complied with the duty.
sch.1-sec.7
Permitted communications between experts and active parties [r 28A(1) to (3) and (6)]
sch.1-sec.7 Permitted communications between experts and active parties [r 28A(1) to (3) and (6)]
Any of the experts may, at any time, participate in a without prejudice conference or mediation under part 5 of these rules involving the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding.
Also, any of the experts may, at any time before the joint report is completed, give 1 or more of the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding (each a recipient ) a written notice—
asking the recipient to respond to a request for information or other inquiry that may assist the proper and timely conduct or conclusion of the meeting of experts or preparation of the joint report; or
informing the recipient of any matter affecting the proper and timely conduct or conclusion of the meeting of experts or preparation of the joint report.
informing the active parties of a delay in gathering data for use in the joint report
However, a notice under subrule (2) may be given to an active party to the P&E Court proceeding only if—
all of the experts agree to the giving of the notice or, if the experts do not agree, the notice states the basis of the disagreement between the experts; and
a copy of the notice is given to all the experts and the other active parties at the same time as the notice is given to the active party.
If an active party to the P&E Court proceeding (the requesting party ) requests a conduct report under rule 28A of these rules, the conduct report may be given to the requesting party only if—
the conduct report is given not more than 2 business days after the request is received by the experts; and
all of the experts agree to the giving of the conduct report or, if the experts do not agree, the conduct report states the basis of the disagreement between the experts; and
the conduct report is in writing; and
a copy of the conduct report is given to all the other active parties at the same time as the conduct report is given to the requesting party.
(sch.1-sec.7-ssec.1) Any of the experts may, at any time, participate in a without prejudice conference or mediation under part 5 of these rules involving the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding.
(sch.1-sec.7-ssec.2) Also, any of the experts may, at any time before the joint report is completed, give 1 or more of the active parties to the P&E Court proceeding (each a recipient ) a written notice— asking the recipient to respond to a request for information or other inquiry that may assist the proper and timely conduct or conclusion of the meeting of experts or preparation of the joint report; or informing the recipient of any matter affecting the proper and timely conduct or conclusion of the meeting of experts or preparation of the joint report. informing the active parties of a delay in gathering data for use in the joint report
(sch.1-sec.7-ssec.3) However, a notice under subrule (2) may be given to an active party to the P&E Court proceeding only if— all of the experts agree to the giving of the notice or, if the experts do not agree, the notice states the basis of the disagreement between the experts; and a copy of the notice is given to all the experts and the other active parties at the same time as the notice is given to the active party.
(sch.1-sec.7-ssec.4) If an active party to the P&E Court proceeding (the requesting party ) requests a conduct report under rule 28A of these rules, the conduct report may be given to the requesting party only if— the conduct report is given not more than 2 business days after the request is received by the experts; and all of the experts agree to the giving of the conduct report or, if the experts do not agree, the conduct report states the basis of the disagreement between the experts; and the conduct report is in writing; and a copy of the conduct report is given to all the other active parties at the same time as the conduct report is given to the requesting party.
(a) asking the recipient to respond to a request for information or other inquiry that may assist the proper and timely conduct or conclusion of the meeting of experts or preparation of the joint report; or
(b) informing the recipient of any matter affecting the proper and timely conduct or conclusion of the meeting of experts or preparation of the joint report. Example for paragraph (b) — informing the active parties of a delay in gathering data for use in the joint report
(a) all of the experts agree to the giving of the notice or, if the experts do not agree, the notice states the basis of the disagreement between the experts; and
(b) a copy of the notice is given to all the experts and the other active parties at the same time as the notice is given to the active party.
(a) the conduct report is given not more than 2 business days after the request is received by the experts; and
(b) all of the experts agree to the giving of the conduct report or, if the experts do not agree, the conduct report states the basis of the disagreement between the experts; and
(c) the conduct report is in writing; and
(d) a copy of the conduct report is given to all the other active parties at the same time as the conduct report is given to the requesting party.
sch.1-pt.4
Giving of evidence by experts and related matters
Giving of evidence by experts and related matters
sch.1-sec.8
Duty of expert [r 33(1), (2) and (5)]
sch.1-sec.8 Duty of expert [r 33(1), (2) and (5)]
The expert has a duty to assist the P&E Court.
The expert—
is not an advocate for an active party to the P&E Court proceeding; and
must not accept instructions from any person to adopt or reject a particular opinion.
The expert’s duties under this rule override any obligation the expert may have to—
any active party to the P&E Court proceeding; or
any person who is liable for the expert’s fees or expenses.
(sch.1-sec.8-ssec.1) The expert has a duty to assist the P&E Court.
(sch.1-sec.8-ssec.2) The expert— is not an advocate for an active party to the P&E Court proceeding; and must not accept instructions from any person to adopt or reject a particular opinion.
(sch.1-sec.8-ssec.3) The expert’s duties under this rule override any obligation the expert may have to— any active party to the P&E Court proceeding; or any person who is liable for the expert’s fees or expenses.
(a) is not an advocate for an active party to the P&E Court proceeding; and
(b) must not accept instructions from any person to adopt or reject a particular opinion.
(a) any active party to the P&E Court proceeding; or
(b) any person who is liable for the expert’s fees or expenses.
sch.1-sec.9
Expert must prepare report [r 34]
sch.1-sec.9 Expert must prepare report [r 34]
The expert must prepare a report for the hearing of the P&E Court proceeding.
If the expert has taken part in a meeting of experts for the P&E Court proceeding—
a joint report prepared in relation to the meeting is taken to be the expert’s report for the hearing of the proceeding; but
the expert may prepare a separate report in relation to any issue of disagreement recorded in the joint report.
However, the separate report must not, without the P&E Court’s leave, raise a new matter not already mentioned in the joint report.
(sch.1-sec.9-ssec.1) The expert must prepare a report for the hearing of the P&E Court proceeding.
(sch.1-sec.9-ssec.2) If the expert has taken part in a meeting of experts for the P&E Court proceeding— a joint report prepared in relation to the meeting is taken to be the expert’s report for the hearing of the proceeding; but the expert may prepare a separate report in relation to any issue of disagreement recorded in the joint report.
(sch.1-sec.9-ssec.3) However, the separate report must not, without the P&E Court’s leave, raise a new matter not already mentioned in the joint report.
(a) a joint report prepared in relation to the meeting is taken to be the expert’s report for the hearing of the proceeding; but
(b) the expert may prepare a separate report in relation to any issue of disagreement recorded in the joint report.
sch.1-sec.10
Requirements for separate report [r 35]
sch.1-sec.10 Requirements for separate report [r 35]
A separate report prepared by the expert must be addressed to the P&E Court and signed by the expert.
The separate report must include the following information—
the expert’s qualifications;
all material facts, whether written or oral, on which the report is based;
the expert’s reasons for each opinion expressed in the report;
references to any literature or other material relied on by the expert to prepare the report;
for any inspection, examination or experiment conducted, initiated, or relied on by the expert to prepare the report—
a description of what was done; and
whether the inspection, examination or experiment was done by the expert or under the expert’s supervision; and
the name and qualifications of any other person involved; and
the result;
if there is a range of opinion on matters dealt with in the report—a summary of the range of opinion, and the reasons why the expert adopted a particular opinion;
if the expert believes the report may be incomplete or inaccurate without a qualification—the qualification;
a summary of the conclusions reached by the expert;
a statement about whether access to any readily ascertainable additional facts would assist the expert in reaching a more reliable conclusion.
However, subrule (2) does not apply to the extent the information is already included in a joint report prepared for the P&E Court proceeding.
If the expert believes an opinion expressed in the separate report is not a concluded opinion, the report must state, where the opinion is expressed, the reason for the expert’s belief.
insufficient research
insufficient data
The expert must confirm in the separate report that—
the expert has read, and agrees to be bound by, the code of conduct; and
the factual matters stated in the report are, as far as the expert knows, true; and
the expert has made all inquiries considered appropriate; and
the opinions stated in the report are genuinely held by the expert; and
the report contains reference to all matters the expert considers significant; and
the expert understands the expert’s duty to the P&E Court and has complied with the duty.
(sch.1-sec.10-ssec.1) A separate report prepared by the expert must be addressed to the P&E Court and signed by the expert.
(sch.1-sec.10-ssec.2) The separate report must include the following information— the expert’s qualifications; all material facts, whether written or oral, on which the report is based; the expert’s reasons for each opinion expressed in the report; references to any literature or other material relied on by the expert to prepare the report; for any inspection, examination or experiment conducted, initiated, or relied on by the expert to prepare the report— a description of what was done; and whether the inspection, examination or experiment was done by the expert or under the expert’s supervision; and the name and qualifications of any other person involved; and the result; if there is a range of opinion on matters dealt with in the report—a summary of the range of opinion, and the reasons why the expert adopted a particular opinion; if the expert believes the report may be incomplete or inaccurate without a qualification—the qualification; a summary of the conclusions reached by the expert; a statement about whether access to any readily ascertainable additional facts would assist the expert in reaching a more reliable conclusion.
(sch.1-sec.10-ssec.3) However, subrule (2) does not apply to the extent the information is already included in a joint report prepared for the P&E Court proceeding.
(sch.1-sec.10-ssec.4) If the expert believes an opinion expressed in the separate report is not a concluded opinion, the report must state, where the opinion is expressed, the reason for the expert’s belief. insufficient research insufficient data
(sch.1-sec.10-ssec.5) The expert must confirm in the separate report that— the expert has read, and agrees to be bound by, the code of conduct; and the factual matters stated in the report are, as far as the expert knows, true; and the expert has made all inquiries considered appropriate; and the opinions stated in the report are genuinely held by the expert; and the report contains reference to all matters the expert considers significant; and the expert understands the expert’s duty to the P&E Court and has complied with the duty.
(a) the expert’s qualifications;
(b) all material facts, whether written or oral, on which the report is based;
(c) the expert’s reasons for each opinion expressed in the report;
(d) references to any literature or other material relied on by the expert to prepare the report;
(e) for any inspection, examination or experiment conducted, initiated, or relied on by the expert to prepare the report— (i) a description of what was done; and (ii) whether the inspection, examination or experiment was done by the expert or under the expert’s supervision; and (iii) the name and qualifications of any other person involved; and (iv) the result;
(i) a description of what was done; and
(ii) whether the inspection, examination or experiment was done by the expert or under the expert’s supervision; and
(iii) the name and qualifications of any other person involved; and
(iv) the result;
(f) if there is a range of opinion on matters dealt with in the report—a summary of the range of opinion, and the reasons why the expert adopted a particular opinion;
(g) if the expert believes the report may be incomplete or inaccurate without a qualification—the qualification;
(h) a summary of the conclusions reached by the expert;
(i) a statement about whether access to any readily ascertainable additional facts would assist the expert in reaching a more reliable conclusion.
(i) a description of what was done; and
(ii) whether the inspection, examination or experiment was done by the expert or under the expert’s supervision; and
(iii) the name and qualifications of any other person involved; and
(iv) the result;
• insufficient research
• insufficient data
(a) the expert has read, and agrees to be bound by, the code of conduct; and
(b) the factual matters stated in the report are, as far as the expert knows, true; and
(c) the expert has made all inquiries considered appropriate; and
(d) the opinions stated in the report are genuinely held by the expert; and
(e) the report contains reference to all matters the expert considers significant; and
(f) the expert understands the expert’s duty to the P&E Court and has complied with the duty.
sch.1-sec.11
Supplementary report following change of opinion [r 35B(1) to (4)]
sch.1-sec.11 Supplementary report following change of opinion [r 35B(1) to (4)]
Subrule (2) applies if the expert changes, in a material way, an opinion included in a report prepared for the P&E Court proceeding (an earlier report ).
Unless the expert knows the P&E Court proceeding has ended, the expert must, as soon as practicable after the change of opinion, give written notice of the change of opinion, and the reason for the change, to the active party who appointed the expert.
If the earlier report has been given under rule 28 of these rules or served under part 3 , division 4 of these rules, the active party who appointed the expert must, as soon as practicable after receiving the notice—
obtain a further report from the expert (a supplementary report ) that—
states the change of opinion and the reason for the change; and
otherwise complies with rule 10 ; and
serve a copy of the supplementary report on each other active party to the P&E Court proceeding; and
apply to the P&E Court for an order or directions about the supplementary report.
For subrule (3) (a) (ii) , the supplementary report may, to the extent necessary, comply with rule 10 by incorporating by reference parts of the earlier report.
(sch.1-sec.11-ssec.1) Subrule (2) applies if the expert changes, in a material way, an opinion included in a report prepared for the P&E Court proceeding (an earlier report ).
(sch.1-sec.11-ssec.2) Unless the expert knows the P&E Court proceeding has ended, the expert must, as soon as practicable after the change of opinion, give written notice of the change of opinion, and the reason for the change, to the active party who appointed the expert.
(sch.1-sec.11-ssec.3) If the earlier report has been given under rule 28 of these rules or served under part 3 , division 4 of these rules, the active party who appointed the expert must, as soon as practicable after receiving the notice— obtain a further report from the expert (a supplementary report ) that— states the change of opinion and the reason for the change; and otherwise complies with rule 10 ; and serve a copy of the supplementary report on each other active party to the P&E Court proceeding; and apply to the P&E Court for an order or directions about the supplementary report.
(sch.1-sec.11-ssec.4) For subrule (3) (a) (ii) , the supplementary report may, to the extent necessary, comply with rule 10 by incorporating by reference parts of the earlier report.
(a) obtain a further report from the expert (a supplementary report ) that— (i) states the change of opinion and the reason for the change; and (ii) otherwise complies with rule 10 ; and
(i) states the change of opinion and the reason for the change; and
(ii) otherwise complies with rule 10 ; and
(b) serve a copy of the supplementary report on each other active party to the P&E Court proceeding; and
(c) apply to the P&E Court for an order or directions about the supplementary report.
(i) states the change of opinion and the reason for the change; and
(ii) otherwise complies with rule 10 ; and
Source text: opening excerpt
Sourced from Queensland Legislation (legislation.qld.gov.au), CC BY 4.0.
pt.1 Preliminary
Preliminary
sec.1 Short title
sec.1 Short title
These rules may be cited as the Planning and Environment Court Rules 2018 .
sec.2 Commencement
sec.2 Commencement
These rules commence on 4 July 2018.
sec.3 Definitions
sec.3 Definitions
The dictionary in schedule 2 defines particular words used in these rules.
r 3 amd 2022 SL No. 18 s 4
sec.4 Application of rules
sec.4 Application of rules
These rules apply to a P&E Court proceeding.
If these rules do not provide for a matter in relation to a P&E Court proceeding and the rules applying in the District Court would provide for the matter in relation to a proceeding in the District Court, the rules applying in the District Court apply for the matter in the P&E Court with necessary changes.
Under section 13 (4) of the Act , the rules may be uniform rules that apply to other courts.
See section 14 (5) of the Act for when an order or direction of the P&E Court, or a direction of the Chief Judge, prevails over these rules.
(sec.4-ssec.1) These rules apply to a P&E Court proceeding.
(sec.4-ssec.2) If these rules do not provide for a matter in relation to a P&E Court proceeding and the rules applying in the District Court would provide for the matter in relation to a proceeding in the District Court, the rules applying in the District Court apply for the matter in the P&E Court with necessary changes. Under section 13 (4) of the Act , the rules may be uniform rules that apply to other courts. See section 14 (5) of the Act for when an order or direction of the P&E Court, or a direction of the Chief Judge, prevails over these rules.
1 Under section 13 (4) of the Act , the rules may be uniform rules that apply to other courts.
2 See section 14 (5) of the Act for when an order or direction of the P&E Court, or a direction of the Chief Judge, prevails over these rules.
sec.5 Compliance with rules and orders of the P&E Court
sec.5 Compliance with rules and orders of the P&E Court
The P&E Court may—
waive compliance with a provision of these rules if the court considers compliance would be likely to cause injustice, unreasonable expense or inconvenience or otherwise considers waiving compliance appropriate; or
excuse noncompliance with a provision of these rules; or
impose appropriate sanctions if a party to a P&E Court proceeding does not comply with these rules or an order of the court.
The P&E Court may dismiss a P&E Court proceeding if a party to the proceeding fails to proceed as required by these rules or an order of the court.
allow the P&E Court broad case-management powers, including identifying preliminary issues, limiting hearing times and witnesses, ordering joint expert meetings and joint reports, and conditioning hearing dates on compliance with directions (r 20; r 22);
make certain Uniform Civil Procedure Rules inapplicable to P&E Court proceedings (r 46A) while providing that, where the rules do not address a matter, District Court rules apply with necessary changes (s 4).
The rules commenced on 4 July 2018 (s 2). They include amendment annotations and later insertions that expand expert-evidence processes and file-access rules (see amendment notes throughout the text, and rr 47A-47C added in 2024). The court retains discretion to waive or excuse compliance and to impose sanctions, including dismissal, for noncompliance (r 5). Certain cross-references to the Planning Act and the broader Act under which the P&E Court sits appear in the rules (for example concerning appeals and the court’s uniform rules power, s 4; see also rr 6 and 12 referencing the Planning Act).
The remainder of this note sets out the principal concepts, who is affected, precise duties and rights established by the instrument, enforcement mechanisms, interactions with other law, amendment annotations present in the instrument, the absence of litigation material in the text, practical pitfalls, and a checklist for compliance grounded in the rules cited above.
Main concepts
The rules operate through a set of recurring procedural concepts and defined roles. Key concepts and where they are enacted include:
Originating application and originating process, an initial document that starts most P&E Court proceedings other than appeals, and which must state the orders or relief sought and the grounds (rr 6, 9). The Planning Act contains a separate start process for Planning Act appeals, which the rules reference (rr 6, 12).
Respondent, the entity directly affected by the relief sought in the originating application (r 8(1)). Notices of appeal must name respondents or co-respondents as required under the Act (r 8(2)).
Address for service and contact details, a detailed list of information that must be on originating processes for applicants acting personally or through lawyers/agents; if the applicant acts personally and lives outside Queensland an in-Queensland address for service must be given (r 10). Lawyers and agents must provide firm details and a Queensland address for service where required (r 10(2)).
Active party, a term used repeatedly in the rules (for example throughout parts 2-5) and defined to include the active party’s lawyer or agent in part 3 (r 24) and part 5 (r 42). Active parties have attendance obligations at ADR events (rr 43-45A) and duties about expert evidence (rr 27-35).
Entry of appearance and notice of election, the mechanism by which entities named (or eligible to elect) become active parties; time limits are strict: entities must file and serve an entry of appearance within 10 business days after service of the originating process (r 14), and an entity entitled to elect to be a party must file a notice of election within 10 business days of receiving the originating process (r 15).
Meetings of experts and joint reports, a structured process where experts in relevant fields meet, prepare a joint report stating matters of agreement and disagreement, and are bound by a code of conduct in schedule 1 (r 28; sch 1). The rules specify the experts’ independent duty to the court, prohibitions on acting as an advocate, and detailed content requirements for separate and supplementary reports (rr 33-35B).
ADR registrar and mediator, court officers who may be directed by the P&E Court, or who may act if all active parties request, to convene and chair case management conferences, without prejudice conferences, and mediations (rr 26, 43-45A). ADR processes have specified attendance and confidentiality effects, including that evidence of admissions at conferences is inadmissible except as provided (r 46).
Court's case-management powers, broad authorities to give directions and orders at any time, and specific powers to order compliance with Planning Act requirements, preliminary issue identification, manage expert witness processes, limit hearing duration and submission length, and require audio/visual attendance (r 20).
Exceptions and precedence, including the P&E Court’s power to waive or excuse compliance (r 5), and the rule that P&E Court orders or directions prevail over inconsistent provisions of the rules (r 30). Also, gaps in these rules are to be filled by District Court rules with necessary changes (s 4).
File access and copying rules are separately regulated, with Uniform Civil Procedure Rules chapter 22 part 1 division 6 not applying (r 47A) and a registrar required to provide copies/certified copies or allow inspection subject to prescribed fees and court orders (rr 47B-47C).
These concepts structure who must do what, when and where. For example the combination of short deadlines (10 business days for entry or election) with the expert-reporting code and the ADR seminar framework means proceedings are designed to move quickly to identify issues and narrow expert disputes. The rules frame the responsibilities of parties, counsel and experts in specific, binding ways; where they are silent, the instrument directs reliance on District Court rules with necessary changes (s 4).
Who it affects
These rules directly assign duties and opportunities to a defined set of actors. Principal affected groups and the concrete effects on them are:
Applicants and appellants, who must prepare an originating application stating the relief sought and grounds (r 9), include prescribed contact and service details depending on whether they act personally or by lawyer/agent (r 10), sign the originating process (r 11), and serve the originating application on other parties within ten business days unless the court orders otherwise (r 12). Applicants with the onus in the proceeding must, within three months after filing, apply for directions if not already done by another party (r 20(3)).
Respondents and entities entitled to elect to be parties, who must file an entry of appearance within 10 business days after service if they wish to be heard (r 14), or file a notice of election within 10 business days after receiving the originating process if eligible (r 15). An active party by election may withdraw subject to procedural steps and timelines (r 17).
Lawyers and agents, who must ensure originating processes contain firm and contact details, and may utilise approved document-exchange addresses where applicable (r 10(2) and note on approved document exchange). Lawyers/agents appear in many rules as the practical vehicle for compliance by parties (r 24).
Experts, who are subject to a detailed code of conduct in schedule 1, must be provided with the code by the appointing party (r 32), owe a duty to assist the court and not to be an advocate (r 33), must prepare reports conforming to prescribed contents (rr 34-35), participate in meetings of experts when ordered (r 28), and follow procedures for material changes in opinion (r 35B). Experts may only be called with leave of the court in certain circumstances (r 35B(5)) and, absent leave, their examination-in-chief must not repeat or expand on matters in their report (r 35C).
ADR registrars and mediators, who must convene and chair meetings of experts, case management conferences, without prejudice conferences and mediations if directed by the P&E Court, and may do so if asked by all active parties (rr 26, 43-45A). ADR officers thus function as the court’s instrument for pre-hearing dispute narrowing.
Court officers and judges, who exercise broad case-management discretions under r 20, can order hearings without notice in urgent cases (r 19), and may impose sanctions, excuse compliance or waive rules where justice or practicalities warrant (r 5).
Parties seeking access to documents and third-party requesters, who may request copies or inspection from a registrar and must pay prescribed fees unless exempted by court order; registrars must comply subject to any court restriction or file use by the court (rr 47B-47C). Rule 47A makes certain Uniform Civil Procedure Rules not applicable to P&E Court files.
Witnesses, who are entitled to reasonable expenses paid by the active party requiring attendance (r 37). That places the direct cost of summoning witnesses onto active parties.
These rules change behaviours: applicants must prepare and serve compliant originating documents quickly; respondents must decide promptly whether to enter an appearance or elect to be a party; experts must follow independence duties and joint-report procedures which alter how expert instructions and fees translate into courtroom testimony; and parties will be called to attend ADR processes and expert meetings convened by court-appointed registrars, potentially shifting time and cost upstream from trial into pre-hearing processes.
The rules place financial obligations on parties for witness expenses (r 37) and prescribed fees for document copies and searches (rr 47B-47C). They also enable the court to condition progress to hearing on compliance with directions (r 22), which affects who bears delay risk and the need to resource case management and expert work promptly.
Key duties and rights
This section lists the principal duties imposed and rights recognised by the rules, with cross-references to the relevant provisions.
Duties imposed on applicants, appellants and parties
Prepare an originating application that names the respondent(s) directly affected and states the relief sought and grounds (rr 8-9).
Include prescribed contact and address-for-service details on originating processes: applicants acting personally must supply address, Queensland address for service if outside Queensland, telephone/email/fax where available; lawyers and agents must supply firm and contact details and a Queensland address for service if required (r 10).
Sign the originating process (r 11).
Serve the originating application on each other party within 10 business days after filing unless the court orders otherwise (r 12).
File an entry of appearance or a notice of election within 10 business days after being served or receiving the originating process (rr 14-15).
If an applicant/appellant has the onus in the proceeding, apply for directions within three months after filing unless another active party has already applied (r 20(3)).
Duties and standards for experts
The appointing active party must give the expert a copy of the code of conduct as soon as practicable after appointment (r 32).
Experts owe a primary duty to assist the court, must not act as advocates for a party, and must not accept instructions to adopt or reject particular opinions (r 33).
Experts must prepare a report for the hearing; joint reports from meetings of experts count as the expert’s report (rr 34-35; sch 1).
Separate reports must include qualifications, material facts relied on, reasons for opinions, references and full disclosure of inspections, experiments and other relevant procedural details; the expert must confirm in the report compliance with the code (r 35).
If an expert changes an opinion materially, the expert must notify the appointing party; the appointing party must obtain a supplementary report, serve it on other active parties and apply for directions (r 35B).
Case management and ADR duties
The P&E Court may make orders and directions at any time about procedural and evidentiary matters (r 20); these can include limits on witness numbers, expert conferencing, exchange of witness statements and the content and performance of dispute-resolution plans.
ADR registrars must convene and chair meetings of experts and case management conferences if ordered, and must do so on request by all active parties (rr 26, 43). ADR registrars or mediators must convene without prejudice conferences and mediations where directed or by agreement (rr 45-45A). Active parties must attend (rr 43-45A).
Rights and procedural protections
The court may waive or excuse compliance with the rules if compliance would likely cause injustice, unreasonable expense or inconvenience, or otherwise if waiving is appropriate; the court may impose sanctions for noncompliance; the court may dismiss proceedings for failure to proceed (r 5).
The expert and parties have constrained communication rights: experts may participate in without prejudice ADR and, before a joint report is finalised, may give limited written notices to active parties under specified conditions (r 28A). Evidence of anything said at ADR conferences is inadmissible, except agreements reached (r 46); admissions at meetings of experts are admissible only with the agreement of all active parties and do not include joint reports (r 29).
Parties and other persons may request copies or inspection of documents filed in a P&E Court proceeding, subject to prescribed fees and any court order restricting access (rr 47B-47C).
The P&E Court’s orders or directions prevail over inconsistent provisions of the division (r 30).
Procedural timeframes and constraints
Strict deadlines are used repeatedly, with 10 business days a recurrent period for service and for filing entries of appearance and notices of election (rr 12, 14-15). Applications must state hearing day and estimate time and, absent P&E Court order, supporting affidavits must be filed and served at least two business days before the hearing (rr 38-39). Draft orders for r 20 applications must be circulated at least two days before hearing with responses by 4:00pm the day before (r 21).
Costs and expenses
Witnesses are entitled to reasonable expenses paid by the party requiring attendance (r 37). The rules exclude certain Uniform Civil Procedure Rules on costs from applying to P&E Court proceedings (r 46A), which affects entitlement and assessment of costs; parties must note the specified exceptions when budgeting litigation.
These duties and rights reallocate practical responsibilities onto parties, counsel and experts, and give the P&E Court and ADR registrars a suite of case-management instruments to control the progression, scope and cost of proceedings. The instrument makes clear that procedural flexibility exists through the court’s power to grant leave, make directions and waive rules, but also that strict timelines and content requirements are the default.
Penalties and enforcement
The rules give the P&E Court several mechanisms for enforcement and sanction, and they also create procedural consequences that operate functionally as enforcement.
Court powers and sanctions
The P&E Court may waive compliance with a provision of these rules where compliance would likely cause injustice, unreasonable expense or inconvenience, or where the court otherwise considers waiving appropriate, and may excuse noncompliance (r 5(1)(a)-(b)). These are discretionary reliefs available to the court.
The court may impose appropriate sanctions if a party does not comply with the rules or an order of the court (r 5(1)(c)). The rules give an explicit example: the P&E Court may dismiss a proceeding if a party fails to proceed as required by the rules or an order of the court (r 5(1)(c) note).
Where the P&E Court makes orders or directions under r 20, the court may decline to set a hearing date until the active parties have complied with the order or directions, or in exceptional circumstances hear the matter without compliance (r 22). That power effectively conditions access to hearing on compliance and can be used to enforce directions.
The P&E Court may, in urgent circumstances, hear and decide a proceeding filed without notice and make other orders without giving notice to any other entity (r 19). This is an enforcement tool for urgent protection but also a source of immediate procedural imbalance if used; the rule makes the court’s discretion explicit.
Admissibility and evidentiary effects
The rules limit the admissibility of admissions and statements made in particular contexts, which has enforcement or protective effects. For example, evidence of anything said at a meeting of experts is admissible only with agreement of all active parties (r 29), and evidence of admissions made at ADR conferences is inadmissible at hearings except for agreements reached (r 46). Those rules preserve confidentiality and encourage frank ADR engagement; they also constrain the ways parties can exploit prior statements.
Expert controls and sanction pathways
Experts are bound by the code of conduct (sch 1) and by the statutory duties in part 3 (rr 32-35). Breach of those duties may lead the court to refuse to admit evidence, to require supplementary reports, to limit the use of expert evidence, or to take other steps as the court considers appropriate under r 20. While the rules do not specify a particular disciplinary sanction such as fines, the court’s discretion under r 20 and r 5 can be used to constrain expert participation and to condition acceptance of evidence on compliance.
Financial consequences
Witnesses must be paid reasonable expenses by the active party requiring attendance (r 37). The rules do not specify the amount but place the cost of witnesses on the calling party. That is an explicit cost allocation rule.
Persons requesting copies or searches of court-file documents must pay any prescribed fee (rr 47B-47C). The registrar may refuse or limit access where a court order restricts the file or document, or where the file is required for the court’s use (r 47C(3)).
Precedence and override
P&E Court orders and directions prevail over inconsistent provisions of the division (r 30). This gives the court an enforcement mechanism to tailor procedural outcomes beyond the strict text of the rules.
What the rules do not specify
The rules do not set out express monetary fines or statutory penalties for noncompliance other than the ordinary costs and dismissal powers. They leave sanction design and application to judicial discretion and to cross-application of the District Court rules where appropriate (s 4).
In short, enforcement is chiefly judicial and discretionary rather than statutory-penal. The court’s tools include waiver, excusal, sanctions up to dismissal, conditioning of hearing dates on compliance, and evidentiary control of expert and ADR-derived material. Financial enforcement is achieved by allocation of costs for witnesses and prescribed fees for file access rather than by explicit punitive fines in the rules themselves.
How it interacts with other laws
The rules are not a standalone code. They interact with the Act under which the P&E Court sits, the Planning Act, the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules and the Evidence Act, among others. The instrument itself references and conditions its application on other laws.
Relations with the Act and the Planning Act
Section 4 explicitly provides that these rules apply to a P&E Court proceeding and that, where the rules do not provide for a matter, the rules applying in the District Court apply with necessary changes (s 4(2)). The section also notes that under s 13(4) of the Act these rules may be uniform rules that apply to other courts, and cross-references s 14(5) of the Act for circumstances in which an order or direction of the P&E Court or a direction of the Chief Judge prevails over these rules (s 4(2) and notes). Those cross-references mean practitioners must be alert to the parent Act when interpreting and applying the rules.
The rules repeatedly refer to the Planning Act in relation to specific procedural items. For example, rr 6 and 12 point to the Planning Act when starting an appeal and for service of notices of appeal (r 6; r 12), and r 20(5)(a) references compliance with a requirement under the Planning Act, s 53. Those references indicate that Planning Act processes and obligations are embedded in the P&E Court’s procedural regime.
Interaction with Uniform Civil Procedure Rules and District Court rules
The rules state that, if they do not provide for a matter and the District Court rules would provide for it, the District Court rules apply with necessary changes (s 4(2)). That means many procedural gaps can be filled by District Court practice, adapted to P&E Court context.
Conversely, the rules exclude certain Uniform Civil Procedure Rules from applying in relation to P&E Court proceedings. Rule 46A states that Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 rr 681, 692, 695 and 698 do not apply in relation to a P&E Court proceeding. Separately, r 47A says Uniform Civil Procedure Rules chapter 22 part 1 division 6 does not apply to documents filed in a P&E Court proceeding. These exceptions change how costs and copying/inspection rights operate compared with other courts, and counsel must take care to consult both sets of rules.
Evidence Act connections
The rules permit experts to give evidence by audio or audio-visual link where required by court order or Chief Judge direction and refer to the Evidence Act 1977 for definitions of audio link and audio visual link (r 25A). That ties the admissibility and technical modalities of remote evidence to the Evidence Act.
Other statutory or regulatory intersections
The rules refer to the Planning Act for certain appeal mechanics, and to other parts of the Act for the P&E Court registry placements and the powers of the Chief Judge and the court (s 4 notes). They also reference the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules’ concept of approved document exchange (r 10(6) referencing Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 r 102). Where prescribed fees are required (for copies, searches), those will be set elsewhere in regulations or fee schedules, and rr 47B-47C make compliance with such prescribed fees a condition of access.
Practical consequence of these interactions
Practitioners must read the P&E Court Rules in tandem with the parent Act, the Planning Act, and selected parts of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules and District Court rules. The instrument allocates an interplay: where silent, District Court rules may apply with changes; where the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules are excluded, the P&E Court has bespoke provisions; where the Evidence Act defines technical terms, it controls the modality of remote evidence. This structure requires cross-referencing and may create traps if a practitioner assumes Uniform Civil Procedure or District Court practice applies without checking the explicit exclusions and cross-references in these rules.
Amendment history
The instrument contains internal annotations that show the rules have been amended and supplemented since commencement. The text supplied includes amendment notes; the key annotated insertions and amendments in the document are as follows. Each entry below cites the annotation as given in the text.
Commencement: The rules commenced on 4 July 2018 (s 2).
2019 amendment: Rule 28, which governs meetings of experts and joint reports, carries an amendment note showing it was amended by 2019 SL No. 67 s 4 (r 28 amd 2019 SL No. 67 s 4). Also parts concerning ADR processes reference amendments in 2019 (see r 45 r 45A amendments).
2022 omnibus amendments and insertions: Multiple provisions contain notes indicating insertion or amendment by 2022 SL No. 18. Examples in the text include:
r 3 (sec. 3) amended 2022 SL No. 18 s 4 (r 3 amd 2022 SL No. 18 s 4).
r 20 amended 2022 SL No. 18 s 5 (r 20 amd 2022 SL No. 18 s 5).
Part 3 definitions and rules related to expert evidence have insertion/subject notes indicating 2022 SL No. 18 s 6 and s 9 and s 10, including r 23 definitions (r 23 def code of conduct ins 2022 SL No. 18 s 6 (2), and joint report definitions sub 2022 SL No. 18 s 6 (1)-(2)).
r 25A (expert evidence other than by report) was inserted by 2022 SL No. 18 s 7 (r 25A ins 2022 SL No. 18 s 7).
r 27 includes an amendment note r 27 amd 2022 SL No. 18 s 8.
r 28A (permitted communications between experts and active parties) was inserted by 2022 SL No. 18 s 9 (r 28A ins 2022 SL No. 18 s 9).
Rules in division 4 governing experts (rr 31-36, 35A-35C, 35B etc.) show a collective “sub 2022 SL No. 18 s 10” annotation, indicating substantive reworking or insertion in 2022.
r 46A (costs of P&E Court proceedings) was inserted by 2022 SL No. 18 s 12 (r 46A ins 2022 SL No. 18 s 12).
2024 additions concerning file access: The instrument includes explicit 2024 insertions:
r 47A, titled “Relationship with Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999,” was inserted by 2024 SL No. 5 s 4 (r 47A ins 2024 SL No. 5 s 4).
r 47B (Copies of documents) and r 47C (Searches for documents) were inserted by 2024 SL No. 5 s 4 (r 47B ins 2024 SL No. 5 s 4; r 47C ins 2024 SL No. 5 s 4).
Schedule 1 (the code of conduct) contains internal references aligning with the 2019 and 2022 amendments; schedule sections reference the applicable rules (sch 1 sec.1 and following). The code’s application and the obligations of experts are presented as part of the updated expert-evidence provisions.
These annotations indicate a pattern of iterative refinement: initial establishment in 2018, followed by expert-evidence focussed adjustments (2019; substantial 2022 package) and later amendments addressing file access and copying (2024). The text as supplied should be read together with the Act and any regulations implementing prescribed fees and the original SL instruments cited. The instrument itself embeds the amendment annotations but does not include the full text of the amending instruments; practitioners must consult the amending SLs cited (for example 2019 SL No. 67; 2022 SL No. 18; 2024 SL No. 5) for the authoritative amendment history and the context of those changes.
Litigation history
The rules document as supplied contains no references to judicial decisions, reported cases or a litigation history. It does not cite any authority where these rules have been interpreted by the courts, and there are no cases named in the instrument. The instrument therefore provides no internal litigation or precedent history.
Practically, users should treat the rules as the current procedural code but should also consult the P&E Court’s published decisions, if any, and relevant District Court or Court of Appeal authorities to understand how the P&E Court exercises the discretionary powers conferred by r 5 (waiver and sanctions), r 19 (ex parte urgent orders), r 20 (directions), r 22 (conditioning hearings), and the detailed expert-evidence provisions (rr 28-35B and sch 1). Because the supplied rules do not include case annotations, counsel must search external sources for any judicial construction, especially on matters likely to produce litigation, such as the scope of the court’s power to dismiss for noncompliance, the limits on expert independence, admissibility of expert-related discussions, and the operation of r 46A on costs.
In sum, the instrument includes no litigation history or case law citations; any jurisprudential development relevant to interpreting these rules must be located outside the text.
Gotchas
The rules contain numerous procedural traps and tightly worded obligations that can have operational and strategic consequences. The following are concrete pitfalls to watch, with references to the relevant rules.
Tight timelines and service rules
Many critical deadlines are short and expressed in business days. Originating applications must be served on other parties within 10 business days after filing unless the court orders otherwise (r 12). Entities served must file entries of appearance or notices of election within 10 business days (rr 14-15). Failure to meet those timeframes can forfeit procedural rights, lead to uncontested progression, or invite the court to impose sanctions under r 5.
Address-for-service complexity
An applicant acting personally must supply an in-Queensland address for service if their stated address is not in Queensland (r 10(1)(b)). If a lawyer’s place of business is not the address for service, a separate Queensland address must be provided (r 10(2)(d)). Omitting correct address-for-service details can invalidate service or delay proceedings.
Expert independence and report constraints
Experts must be given the code of conduct (r 32) and owe a duty to assist the court; they must not act as advocates or accept instructions to adopt/reject opinions (r 33). Parties cannot instruct experts to take positions in advance. This changes customary retainer practices and may require retainer wording and procurement practices to be adjusted.
Experts who participate in meetings of experts must prepare a joint report that records agreements and disagreements and confirms compliance with the code (r 28). Separate reports may not raise new matters without leave (r 34). If an expert materially changes opinion after a report, the expert must notify the appointing party and a supplementary report procedure follows, including a court application (r 35B). Parties should anticipate follow-up court work and possible leave hearings if supplementary matters arise.
Examination-in-chief without the court’s leave must not repeat or expand matters contained in a report or introduce new material (r 35C), which constrains oral evidence strategies.
Admissibility and confidentiality traps
Materials and admissions in ADR conferences are generally inadmissible (r 46), while admissions at meetings of experts are admissible only if all active parties agree (r 29). Parties must carefully manage communications in ADR and expert meetings because statements made for settlement or in expert deliberation may not be available for use in the hearing.
Expert-initiated notices to parties before joint-report completion are permitted, but only where all experts agree or where the notice delineates the experts’ disagreement, and copies must be provided to all active parties and experts at the same time (r 28A). Responses are time-limited and must be exchanged under procedural constraints (r 28A(3)). That sequencing must be tracked meticulously.
Single-expert limitation
Without leave, a party may call evidence from only one expert for each area of expertise at any hearing (r 36). This constraint compels strategic decisions at the case-management stage about which expert is best positioned to be the single witness in a field.
Draft order communication deadlines
For any application under r 20, the applicant must give other active parties a copy of the draft order at least two days before the matter is heard; recipients must accept or reject and, if rejecting, provide their draft by 4:00pm on the day before the hearing (r 21). Missing these deadlines can preclude effective opposition or lead to procedural disadvantage.
Costs rules divergence
r 46A excludes certain Uniform Civil Procedure Rules on costs from applying to P&E Court proceedings. Practitioners must not assume the usual Uniform Civil Procedure Rules provisions on costs apply in the P&E Court; consult r 46A and associated authorities to understand cost consequences.
File access and prescribed fees
rr 47B-47C require payment of prescribed fees for copies and searches by non-parties, and the registrar may restrict access where a court order limits the file or the file is required for the court’s use. Professionals seeking documents for investigation or reporting must account for fees and potential access limits.
Court discretion and overriding orders
The P&E Court may waive rules, excuse noncompliance or order exceptions in urgent cases, including hearing matters without notice (rr 5, 19). Reliance on standard deadlines is risky where the court has exercised discretion; parties should check for any orders or Chief Judge directions that prevail over the rules (s 4 referencing s 14(5) of the Act; r 30).
Practical coordination risks
The rules require that, if a meeting of experts is ordered, experts prepare a joint report and hold meetings in the absence of parties unless the court orders otherwise (r 28). Logistics, simultaneous availability of experts and timely exchange of underlying data are practical risks that can cause delays and lead to supplementary reports and further court directions (r 28A; r 35B).
Who pays
Witness expenses fall to the active party calling the witness (r 37). Experts’ fees and costs of convening meetings will be borne by the appointing parties and must be budgeted. Copy and search fees are prescribed and payable by requesters (rr 47B-47C).
In operational terms, these “gotchas” are concrete obligations and limits contained in the rules. Practitioners should audit service windows, address-for-service statements, expert retainer clauses, and internal timelines to avoid inadvertent forfeiture of rights and to control costs driven upstream by mandatory expert conferencing and ADR events.
How to comply
This is a practical, rule-by-rule compliance checklist to reduce operational risk. It follows the rules’ sequence and cites the controlling provisions. It is written as a procedural checklist for counsel, litigants and case managers.
Start-up and filing
Commence proceedings correctly:
For most P&E Court proceedings, start by filing an originating application (r 6). For Planning Act appeals refer separately to the Planning Act as required (r 6).
Ensure the originating process states the orders or relief sought and the grounds for relief (r 9).
Include required contact and service details:
If the applicant acts personally, include residential or business address, a Queensland address for service if outside Queensland, phone/email/fax details as available (r 10(1)).
If represented, list the lawyer/agent’s name, firm, place of business address, a Queensland address for service where needed, and telephone and email contact (r 10(2)).
Sign and file:
Ensure the applicant/appellant, or their lawyer/agent, signs the originating process before filing (r 11).
Service after filing:
Unless the court orders otherwise, serve the originating application on each other party within 10 business days of filing (r 12). Keep proof of service and file requisite affidavits if discontinuing (r 16).
Entries of appearance and election
5. Monitor service dates:
Respondents wishing to be heard must file an entry of appearance in the approved form and serve it on other parties within 10 business days after being served with the originating process (r 14).
Entities entitled to elect to be parties must file a notice of election within 10 business days after receiving the originating process (r 15). Filing the notice makes the entity a party immediately.
Applications and short-form procedures
6. Prepare applications carefully:
Make applications in the approved form, state the hearing day and time estimate, the relief sought, and, if the applicant is not a party, include originator details as per r 10 (r 38).
File and serve the application and any supporting affidavit on each respondent at least 2 business days before the day the application is to be heard unless the court orders otherwise (r 39).
Draft orders:
For any application under r 20, circulate a draft order to other active parties at least two days before the hearing; expect accept/reject notifications by 4:00pm the day before (r 21).
Expert evidence and meetings of experts
8. Early expert housekeeping:
As soon as an expert is appointed, give the expert the code of conduct (r 32; sch 1 sec 1-2).
Include retainer provisions that reflect the expert’s duty to the court and prohibit instructions to adopt/reject particular opinions (r 32-33). Ensure payment arrangements recognise that the expert’s duty to the court overrides payment obligations (r 33(5)).
Prepare for meetings of experts:
If the court orders a meeting of experts, either request an ADR registrar or comply with the registrar’s convening (r 26). If convened, ensure expert availability and pre-meeting exchange of relevant information as required by r 27.
Joint report and separate reports:
Ensure experts produce a joint report stating matters of agreement and disagreement, confirming code compliance, factual accuracy and that opinions are genuinely held (r 28; sch 1 sec 6).
Prepare separate reports only where permitted, and ensure separate reports comply with r 35 content requirements (r 34-35). Do not introduce new matters in separate reports without leave of the court (r 34).
Change of opinion protocol:
If an expert changes an opinion materially, ensure the expert gives written notice to the appointing party; obtain and serve a supplementary report, and apply to the court for directions as soon as practicable (r 35B).
ADR and case management
12. Attend ADR and case management conferences:
- If directed, attend case management conferences, without prejudice conferences and mediations convened by the ADR registrar or mediator (rr 43-45A). Send representatives authorised to settle or recommend settlement if attendance by a person with authority is impractical (rr 45-45A).
13. Confidentiality of ADR communications:
- Plan negotiations knowing that statements made at ADR conferences are generally inadmissible, except evidence of any agreement reached (r 46).
Document management and format
14. File documents at the correct registry:
- File entries of appearance or notices of election either at the registry where the originating process was filed or at the place the P&E Court file is kept (r 49).
- File all other documents at the place the P&E Court file is kept (r 49).
15. Ensure correct document format:
- Number pages consecutively and divide submissions and affidavits into consecutively numbered paragraphs and subparagraphs, each addressing a separate allegation or topic where practicable (r 50).
Access, copies and searches
16. Requests for copies/inspection:
- Use rr 47B-47C procedures to request copies, certified copies or searches. Be prepared to pay prescribed fees and respect court orders restricting access (rr 47B-47C).
- If you are not a party, budget for fees for searches and inspection and expect registrars to follow the prescribed process (r 47C).
Costs and witnesses
17. Budget witness and expert costs:
- Witnesses summoned are entitled to reasonable expenses paid by the active party requiring attendance (r 37). Build these into budgets and expert procurement decisions.
18. Understand cost rule exceptions:
- Note that Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 rr 681, 692, 695 and 698 do not apply in P&E Court proceedings (r 46A). Do not assume ordinary Uniform Civil Procedure costs rules apply.
Court powers and exceptional steps
19. Use the court’s discretions when needed:
- Apply for waivers or directions early if compliance would cause injustice or unreasonable expense (r 5). If urgent relief is required, consider whether an ex parte application under r 19 is appropriate, remembering the court’s strict discretion.
20. Condition hearing readiness on compliance:
- If the court orders directions under r 20, be prepared that the court may decline to fix a hearing date until compliance is demonstrated (r 22).
Operational checklist summary (first 30 days)
Day 0: File originating application, ensure it complies with rr 9-11 and is signed (r 11).
Within 10 business days of filing: serve the originating application (r 12); anticipate and monitor entries of appearance or notices of election by respondents (rr 14-15).
If experts are or will be engaged, deliver the code of conduct to them promptly and confirm their availability for meetings of experts and ADR events (rr 32, 27-28).
Before any interlocutory application hearing: circulate draft orders, file supporting affidavits and serve copies at least 2 business days before hearing (rr 21, 38-39).
This checklist maps the principal obligations to concrete actions and timeframes tied to the rules. It is essential to build internal case plans around the 10-business-day and 2-business-day windows, to document service and proof of service accurately, to integrate expert retainer language consistent with the code of conduct, and to budget for witness expenses and prescribed copy/search fees as required by rr 37 and 47B-47C.
Section sec.5Compliance with rules and orders of the P&E Court
(a) waive compliance with a provision of these rules if the court considers compliance would be likely to cause injustice, unreasonable expense or inconvenience or otherwise considers waiving compliance appropriate; or
(b) excuse noncompliance with a provision of these rules; or
(c) impose appropriate sanctions if a party to a P&E Court proceeding does not comply with these rules or an order of the court. Example for paragraph (c) — The P&E Court may dismiss a P&E Court proceeding if a party to the proceeding fails to proceed as required by these rules or an order of the court.
pt.2 Conduct of P&E Court proceedings
Conduct of P&E Court proceedings
pt.2-div.1 Starting P&E Court proceedings
Starting P&E Court proceedings
sec.6 Starting P&E Court proceeding other than appeal
sec.6 Starting P&E Court proceeding other than appeal
A P&E Court proceeding, other than an appeal, is started by filing an originating application.
a declaratory proceeding
For starting a Planning Act appeal, see the Planning Act , section 230 .
sec.7 Where to start P&E Court proceeding
sec.7 Where to start P&E Court proceeding
A P&E Court proceeding may be started in any registry of the P&E Court.
For the registries of the P&E Court, see section 68 of the Act .
sec.8 Originating process—respondent
sec.8 Originating process—respondent
An originating application must name as a respondent the entity directly affected by the relief sought.
A notice of appeal must name as a respondent or co-respondent the entity that is the respondent or co-respondent under an Act.
(sec.8-ssec.1) An originating application must name as a respondent the entity directly affected by the relief sought.
(sec.8-ssec.2) A notice of appeal must name as a respondent or co-respondent the entity that is the respondent or co-respondent under an Act.
sec.9 Originating process—content
sec.9 Originating process—content
The originating process for a P&E Court proceeding must state—
the orders or other relief sought in the proceeding; and
the grounds on which the orders or other relief are sought.
(a) the orders or other relief sought in the proceeding; and
(b) the grounds on which the orders or other relief are sought.
sec.10 Originating process—contact details and address for service of applicant or appellant
sec.10 Originating process—contact details and address for service of applicant or appellant
An applicant or appellant intending to act personally must ensure all of the following details are stated on the originating process before it is filed—
the residential or business address of the applicant or appellant;
if the address stated under paragraph (a) is not in Queensland—an address in Queensland where documents may be served on the applicant or appellant;
the telephone number, if any, of the applicant or appellant;
if the applicant or appellant does not have a telephone number—a way of contacting the applicant or appellant by telephone;
the email address, if any, of the applicant or appellant;
the fax number, if any, of the applicant or appellant.
A lawyer or agent acting for an applicant or appellant must ensure all of the following details are stated on the originating process before it is filed—
the residential or business address of the applicant or appellant;
the name of the lawyer or agent and, if the lawyer or agent practises in a firm, the name of the firm;
the address of the place of business of the lawyer or agent;
if the address stated under paragraph (c) is not the applicant’s or appellant’s address for service or is not an address in Queensland—an address for service in Queensland including, for example, an address approved by the P&E Court as the address for service;
the telephone number of the lawyer or agent;
the email address of the lawyer or agent;
the fax number, if any, of the lawyer or agent.
If the lawyer or agent, or the lawyer’s or agent’s firm, is a member of an approved document exchange, the lawyer or agent may include the document exchange address with the details required under subrule (2) .
Notice of any change in an applicant’s or appellant’s address for service must be filed and served on each other party to the P&E Court proceeding.
The address for service of an applicant or appellant is—
for an applicant or appellant acting personally—
if the applicant or appellant is required to state an address under subrule (1) (b) —that address; or
otherwise—the address stated under subrule (1) (a) ; or
for an applicant or appellant for whom a lawyer or agent acts—
if an address is stated under subrule (2) (d) —that address; or
otherwise—the address stated under subrule (2) (c) .
In this rule—
approved document exchange means a document exchange approved under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 , rule 102 .
(sec.10-ssec.1) An applicant or appellant intending to act personally must ensure all of the following details are stated on the originating process before it is filed— the residential or business address of the applicant or appellant; if the address stated under paragraph (a) is not in Queensland—an address in Queensland where documents may be served on the applicant or appellant; the telephone number, if any, of the applicant or appellant; if the applicant or appellant does not have a telephone number—a way of contacting the applicant or appellant by telephone; the email address, if any, of the applicant or appellant; the fax number, if any, of the applicant or appellant.
(sec.10-ssec.2) A lawyer or agent acting for an applicant or appellant must ensure all of the following details are stated on the originating process before it is filed— the residential or business address of the applicant or appellant; the name of the lawyer or agent and, if the lawyer or agent practises in a firm, the name of the firm; the address of the place of business of the lawyer or agent; if the address stated under paragraph (c) is not the applicant’s or appellant’s address for service or is not an address in Queensland—an address for service in Queensland including, for example, an address approved by the P&E Court as the address for service; the telephone number of the lawyer or agent; the email address of the lawyer or agent; the fax number, if any, of the lawyer or agent.
(sec.10-ssec.3) If the lawyer or agent, or the lawyer’s or agent’s firm, is a member of an approved document exchange, the lawyer or agent may include the document exchange address with the details required under subrule (2) .
(sec.10-ssec.4) Notice of any change in an applicant’s or appellant’s address for service must be filed and served on each other party to the P&E Court proceeding.
(sec.10-ssec.5) The address for service of an applicant or appellant is— for an applicant or appellant acting personally— if the applicant or appellant is required to state an address under subrule (1) (b) —that address; or otherwise—the address stated under subrule (1) (a) ; or for an applicant or appellant for whom a lawyer or agent acts— if an address is stated under subrule (2) (d) —that address; or otherwise—the address stated under subrule (2) (c) .
(sec.10-ssec.6) In this rule— approved document exchange means a document exchange approved under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 , rule 102 .
(a) the residential or business address of the applicant or appellant;
(b) if the address stated under paragraph (a) is not in Queensland—an address in Queensland where documents may be served on the applicant or appellant;
(c) the telephone number, if any, of the applicant or appellant;
(d) if the applicant or appellant does not have a telephone number—a way of contacting the applicant or appellant by telephone;
(e) the email address, if any, of the applicant or appellant;
(f) the fax number, if any, of the applicant or appellant.
(a) the residential or business address of the applicant or appellant;
(b) the name of the lawyer or agent and, if the lawyer or agent practises in a firm, the name of the firm;
(c) the address of the place of business of the lawyer or agent;
(d) if the address stated under paragraph (c) is not the applicant’s or appellant’s address for service or is not an address in Queensland—an address for service in Queensland including, for example, an address approved by the P&E Court as the address for service;
(e) the telephone number of the lawyer or agent;
(f) the email address of the lawyer or agent;
(g) the fax number, if any, of the lawyer or agent.
(a) for an applicant or appellant acting personally— (i) if the applicant or appellant is required to state an address under subrule (1) (b) —that address; or (ii) otherwise—the address stated under subrule (1) (a) ; or
(i) if the applicant or appellant is required to state an address under subrule (1) (b) —that address; or
(ii) otherwise—the address stated under subrule (1) (a) ; or
(b) for an applicant or appellant for whom a lawyer or agent acts— (i) if an address is stated under subrule (2) (d) —that address; or (ii) otherwise—the address stated under subrule (2) (c) .
(i) if an address is stated under subrule (2) (d) —that address; or
(ii) otherwise—the address stated under subrule (2) (c) .
(i) if the applicant or appellant is required to state an address under subrule (1) (b) —that address; or
(ii) otherwise—the address stated under subrule (1) (a) ; or
(i) if an address is stated under subrule (2) (d) —that address; or
(ii) otherwise—the address stated under subrule (2) (c) .
sec.11 Originating process must be signed
sec.11 Originating process must be signed
The applicant or appellant, or the applicant’s or appellant’s lawyer or agent, must sign the originating process.
sec.12 Originating application must be served on other parties
sec.12 Originating application must be served on other parties
Unless the P&E Court otherwise orders under rule 19 , an applicant must, within 10 business days after filing the originating application, serve a copy of the application on each other party to the P&E Court proceeding.
For the requirement to serve a copy of a notice of appeal under the Planning Act to other parties, see the Planning Act , section 230 .
sec.13 Notice of declaratory proceeding
sec.13 Notice of declaratory proceeding
If an entity starts a declaratory proceeding, the entity must, on the day the entity starts the proceeding, give the chief executive written notice of the proceeding.
pt.2-div.2 Entries of appearance and notices of election
Entries of appearance and notices of election
sec.14 Entity named in originating process must file and serve entry of appearance
sec.14 Entity named in originating process must file and serve entry of appearance
This rule applies to an entity—
that is named as a respondent in an originating application and wishes to be heard on the application; or
that—
is named as a respondent or co-respondent in a notice of appeal; and
is entitled, under an Act, to be heard on the appeal; and
wishes to be heard on the appeal.
The entity must, within 10 business days after being served with a copy of the originating process—
file an entry of appearance in the approved form (an entry of appearance ); and
serve a copy of the entry of appearance on each other party to the P&E Court proceeding.
(sec.14-ssec.1) This rule applies to an entity— that is named as a respondent in an originating application and wishes to be heard on the application; or that— is named as a respondent or co-respondent in a notice of appeal; and is entitled, under an Act, to be heard on the appeal; and wishes to be heard on the appeal.
(sec.14-ssec.2) The entity must, within 10 business days after being served with a copy of the originating process— file an entry of appearance in the approved form (an entry of appearance ); and serve a copy of the entry of appearance on each other party to the P&E Court proceeding.
(a) that is named as a respondent in an originating application and wishes to be heard on the application; or
(b) that— (i) is named as a respondent or co-respondent in a notice of appeal; and (ii) is entitled, under an Act, to be heard on the appeal; and (iii) wishes to be heard on the appeal.
(i) is named as a respondent or co-respondent in a notice of appeal; and
(ii) is entitled, under an Act, to be heard on the appeal; and
(iii) wishes to be heard on the appeal.
(i) is named as a respondent or co-respondent in a notice of appeal; and
(ii) is entitled, under an Act, to be heard on the appeal; and
(iii) wishes to be heard on the appeal.
(a) file an entry of appearance in the approved form (an entry of appearance ); and
(b) serve a copy of the entry of appearance on each other party to the P&E Court proceeding.
sec.15 Entity electing to be party must file and serve notice of election
sec.15 Entity electing to be party must file and serve notice of election
This rule applies to an en
This is an opening excerpt, not the complete document.