Most people do not realise that the definition of corrupt conduct in s 8 is extraordinarily broad and can capture conduct by any person (not just public officials) if it adversely affects or could adversely affect honest or impartial official functions (s 8(1)(a)), or could involve any of the long list of matters in s 8(2) (official misconduct, bribery, blackmail, fraud, theft, perverting justice, tax evasion, illegal drug dealings, forgery, violence, conspiracies). Section 8(2A) adds impairment of public confidence through collusive tendering, fraud on health, safety or environmental licences, dishonest obtaining of public funds or assets, defrauding revenue, or fraudulent obtaining of public employment. Conduct outside New South Wales or Australia is covered if it relates to State matters or any law (s 8(5)). It can relate to a person who later becomes or seeks to become a public official (s 8(4)), and can pre-date the Act or relevant subsections if effects straddle commencement (s 8(3)). Specific mention of a kind of conduct does not limit other provisions (s 8(6)).
The limitation in s 9 is narrower than many assume: conduct is not corrupt unless it could constitute a criminal offence, disciplinary offence, grounds for dismissal, or (for Ministers, Parliamentary Secretaries or MPs) substantial breach of a code (s 9(1)). Yet s 9(4) carves out conduct that a reasonable person would believe brings the office or Parliament into serious disrepute, though s 9(5) prevents a report finding corrupt conduct unless the Commission is satisfied of a breach of another law and identifies it. For local government councillors, only substantial breaches of codes count as disciplinary offences (s 9(6)).
The Commission need not make a finding that corrupt conduct has occurred (s 13(2A)), yet may make findings and opinions on any conduct, circumstances or events, including that particular persons have engaged in corrupt conduct, that DPP advice should be sought, that other action should or should not be taken, or findings of fact (s 13(5)). Reports must address whether prosecution, disciplinary or dismissal action should be considered for "affected" persons (s 74A(2)), but cannot include findings of guilt or recommendations for prosecution (s 74B) or non-serious corrupt conduct (s 74BA).
Public inquiries require Chief Commissioner and one other Commissioner authorisation (s 6(2)), presumed duly authorised unless contrary established (s 6(5)). The Chief Commissioner's decision prevails in inconsistency (s 6(6)). Procedural guidelines under s 31B are mandatory for public inquiries on exculpatory evidence, disclosure, credibility cross-examination, document access and preparation time "to ensure procedural fairness". Yet the Commission is not bound by evidence rules, must minimise formality, technicality and adversarial approach (s 17(1)-(2)), and may hold parts of inquiries in private if in the public interest (s 31(9)), including closing submissions (s 31(10)).
Self-incrimination gives only use immunity (ss 26(2), 37(3)), not derivative use immunity, and material may be used in the investigation despite objection (s 26(3)). Legal professional privilege is preserved only for communications with lawyers appearing or anticipated to appear (s 37(5)). Religious confessions are protected (s 17(3) applying Evidence Act 1995 s 127). Notices under ss 21-22 can be set aside for court privilege if the person does not consent (ss 24(2), 25(2)), but must be complied with despite public interest immunity, official privileges or secrecy duties (ss 24(3), 25(3)).
The duty to report under s 11 applies to the Ombudsman, Police Commissioner, principal officers, Ministers and others, overriding secrecy, but the Police and Crime Commissioners are relieved for their own officers unless another public official is involved (s 11(2A)-(2B)). Complaints can be made by anyone, including prisoners via governors who must facilitate and forward unopened (s 10(4)).
The Inspector can audit the Commission, investigate complaints of abuse of power, impropriety, misconduct or maladministration (including delay or unreasonable privacy invasions), assess procedures, have full access, require information or attendance, refer matters and recommend action (ss 57B-57C). The Inspector is not subject to the Commission (s 57B(3)). Former officers remain within scope (s 57G).
Part 8A protections apply to "protected action" (complaints about corrupt conduct or other Commission-dealable matters, compliance with protected obligations under ss 11, 21, 22, 35 or 57D, appearing as witness, assisting otherwise), but not to public interest disclosures (which have equivalent protections elsewhere) or wilfully false statements (s 79D(2)). Limited protected action (non-genuine complaints by public officials or assistance) receives narrower safeguards (ss 79D(3), 79H). Detrimental action is a criminal offence with reverse onus on the accused once the prosecution proves the act (s 79I(4)), and civilly actionable with employer liability and injunctions (ss 79J-79L). Reasonable management action is not detrimental action (s 79F), but the onus is on the person taking it to satisfy the Supreme Court of reasons and purpose in injunction proceedings (s 79L(7)). Identifying information cannot be disclosed by the Commission, public officials or authorities except in listed circumstances, including for medical or psychological care, with consent, to prevent detriment, or if already public (s 79Q).
Section 74E requires published time standards for s 74 reports, monitoring, action if standards not met, and reporting of performance and reasons for failure in every such report and the annual report. Most practitioners miss that the Commission may defer reports in the public interest (except for parliamentary references) (s 74(8)), that evidence may be gathered after investigation completion at DPP or Electoral Commission request (s 52A), that the Commission may investigate without a referral if otherwise authorised (s 13A(4)), and that the Inspector may make recommendations or reports at any time and provide them to the Commission, complainant or affected persons (s 57B(5)).
The broad "public official" definition catches employees of or persons acting for or on behalf of any listed body, including as deputy or delegate (s 3(1)(m)), and those reimbursed from auditable entity funds for attending meetings (s 3(1)(j)). Conduct of a Minister or MP that would cause a reasonable person to believe it brings the office or Parliament into serious disrepute is not excluded by s 9 if it meets the s 9(4) test, yet cannot be the subject of a corrupt conduct finding in a report unless a law (apart from the Act) is breached and identified (s 9(5)).
These "gotchas" justify specialist advice: the Act's breadth, immunities, procedural mandates and oversight mechanisms contain traps for the unwary.