Zoe

United States legal-change intelligence across legislation, regulation, and case law. Separate data plane, same Zoe spine.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Ask Zoe

Company

Pricing
API
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Federal
Supreme Court
Alabama

Zoe

United States legal-change intelligence across legislation, regulation, and case law. Separate data plane, same Zoe spine.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Ask Zoe

Company

Pricing
API
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Federal
Supreme Court
Alabama

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the official source for authoritative text.

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cargolux Airlines International SA - [2009] FCA 342 - FCA 2009 case summary — Zoe

Zoe

Legislation Cases Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Ask Zoe →

Home/Cases/[2009] FCA 342

CTHFCA

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cargolux Airlines International SA

[2009] FCA 342

Federal Court of Australia|2009-04-14|Before: Lindgren J

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Federal Court of Australia

Decision date

2009-04-14

Before

Lindgren J

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Judgment (5 paragraphs)

[1]

Lufthansa announced additional trigger points for levels 5 and 6 on 14 May 2004.

[2]

Lufthansa announced additional trigger points for levels 7 and 8 on 20 September 2004.

[3]

Lufthansa announced additional trigger points for levels 9 and 10 on 21 March 2005.

[4]

Lufthansa announced additional trigger points for levels 11 and 12 on 22 August 2005.

[5]

Lufthansa announced additional trigger points for levels 13 and 14 on 4 October 2005.

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission

Respondent/Defendant:

Cargolux Airlines International SA

Legislation Cited (2)

Trade Practices Act 1974(Cth)

Evidence Act 1995(Cth)

Cases Cited (4)