Establishes a two‑stage review for many administrative decisions: internal agency review followed by external review by the Civil and Administrative Tribunal. It requires notice and reasons, time limits and document‑lodgement, lets the Tribunal substitute or stay decisions, and generally obliges the Tribunal to follow relevant government policy. Affects administrators (who bear compliance costs and select internal reviewers), applicants seeking review, and ministers certifying policy—shaping incentives, record‑keeping and dispute resolution.
The Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (ADR Act) supplies the procedural architecture for independent scrutiny of administrative decisions made under New South Wales legislation. At its core it mandates a preliminary internal review stage (s 53) before most applications to the Civil and Administrative Tribunal can be lodged (s 55(3)). Administrators must take reasonable steps to notify interested persons of reviewable decisions and their review rights (s 48(1)), subject to enumerated exceptions in s 48(2). On written request they must furnish a statement of reasons within 28 days setting out findings on material questions of fact, the applicable law, and the reasoning process (s 49(2)–(3)). Refusals to supply reasons are themselves reviewable by the Tribunal (ss 50–52).
Once an internal review is finalised (or the Tribunal dispenses with that requirement under s 55(4)–(6)), an interested person may apply to the Tribunal. The Tribunal’s administrative review jurisdiction is conferred only by enabling legislation (s 9(1)) and is limited to the conditions that legislation imposes (s 9(2)). On review the Tribunal determines what is the “correct and preferable decision” on the material before it, including any relevant factual material and applicable written or unwritten law (s 63(1)). It may exercise all functions conferred on the original administrator (s 63(2)) and may affirm, vary, set aside and substitute, or set aside and remit with directions (s 63(3)).
The Act also regulates the effect of pending applications. An application does not automatically stay the decision (s 60(1)), but the Tribunal may order a stay or other interim relief after considering the interests of affected persons, the administrator’s submissions and the public interest (s 60(2)–(3)). Strict rules govern the making and variation of stay orders (ss 61–62). Administrators must lodge a copy of any reasons, the internal-review statement (if any) and all relevant documents within 28 days (s 58(1)), subject to objections on privilege or confidentiality grounds (ss 59, 67). The Tribunal must give effect to relevant Government policy unless it is contrary to law or produces an unjust result (s 64(1)), while retaining discretion to consider other policies applied by the administrator (s 64(4)).
Current sections
Direct links to the current provisions in Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997.
This Act commences on a day or days to be appointed by proclamation.
3
Objects of Act
3 Objects of Act
3 Objects of Act
The objects of this Act are as follows:
(a) to provide a preliminary process for the internal review of administratively reviewable decisions before the administrative review of such decisions by the Tribunal under this Act,
(b) to require administrators making administratively reviewable decisions to notify persons of decisions affecting them and of any review rights they might have and to provide reasons for decisions of administrators on request,
(c) to foster an atmosphere in which administrative review by the Tribunal is viewed positively as a means of enhancing the delivery of services and programs,
(d) to promote and effect compliance by administrators with legislation enacted by Parliament for the benefit of the citizens of New South Wales.
s 3: Subst 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [3].
4
Definitions
4 Definitions
4 Definitions
(1) In this Act:
administrative review jurisdiction of the Tribunal—see section 9.
enabling legislation means legislation (other than this Act or any statutory rules made under this Act) that:
(a) provides for applications to be made to the Tribunal with respect to a specified matter or class of matters, or
(b) otherwise enables the Tribunal to exercise functions with respect to a specified matter or class of matters.
function includes a power, authority or duty, and exercise a function includes perform a duty.
interested person means a person who is entitled under enabling legislation to make an application to the Tribunal for an administrative review under this Act of an administratively reviewable decision.
internal review means an internal review conducted under section 53.
Tribunal means the Civil and Administrative Tribunal.
(2) A reference in this Act to the exercise by the Tribunal of its functions in relation to enabling legislation includes a reference both to its functions under the enabling legislation and its functions under this Act in relation to the enabling legislation.
(3) A reference (however described) in this Act to a decision made under enabling legislation is taken, in relation to an administratively reviewable decision, to include a reference to any decision made in the exercise of functions identified by the enabling legislation.
(4) Notes included in this Act do not form part of this Act.
s 4: Am 1997 No 141, Sch 1.1 [1]; 1998 No 156, Sch 1 [1] [2]; 2002 No 119, Sch 3 [1]–[3]; 2005 No 46, Sch 11.1 [1]; 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [4]–[7].
5
5
5 (Repealed)
6
Meaning of “decision”
6 Meaning of “decision”
6 Meaning of “decision”
(1) General meaning A decision includes any of the following:
(a) making, suspending, revoking or refusing to make an order or determination,
(b) giving, suspending, revoking or refusing to give a certificate, direction, approval, consent or permission,
(c) issuing, suspending, revoking or refusing to issue a licence, authority or other instrument,
(d) imposing a condition or restriction,
(e) making a declaration, demand or requirement,
(f) retaining, or refusing to deliver up, an article,
(g) doing or refusing to do any other act or thing.
(2) Decision made under enabling legislation For the purposes of this Act, a decision is made under enabling legislation if it is made in the exercise (or purported exercise) of a function conferred or imposed by or under the enabling legislation.
(3) Decisions made without power For the purposes of this Act (and without limiting subsection (2)), a decision that purports to be made under enabling legislation is taken to be a decision made under the enabling legislation even if the decision was beyond the power of the decision-maker to make it.
(4) Failure to make decision on basis that beyond power For the purposes of this Act (and without limiting subsection (2)), a refusal of a decision-maker to make a decision under enabling legislation because the decision-maker considers that the decision concerned cannot lawfully be made under the enabling legislation is taken to be a decision made under the enabling legislation to refuse to make the decision requested.
(5) Failure to make a timely decision taken to be failure to make a decision For the purposes of this Act, a failure by a decision-maker to make a decision within the period specified by the enabling legislation concerned for making the decision is taken to be a decision by the decision-maker at the end of the period to refuse to make the decision.
s 6: Am 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [9].
7
Meaning of “administratively reviewable decision”
7 Meaning of “administratively reviewable decision”
7 Meaning of “administratively reviewable decision”
(1) An administratively reviewable decision is a decision of an administrator over which the Tribunal has administrative review jurisdiction.
(2) For the avoidance of doubt (and without limiting subsection (1) or section 6):
(a) the conduct of an administrator (or a refusal by an administrator to engage in conduct) is an administratively reviewable decision if enabling legislation identifies that conduct or refusal as conduct or refusal over which the Tribunal has administrative review jurisdiction, and
(b) in its application to any such conduct or refusal by an administrator, any reference in this Act (however expressed) to an administrator making an administratively reviewable decision includes a reference to an administrator engaging or refusing to engage in the conduct.
s 7: Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [10]. Ins 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
8
Meaning of “administrator”
8 Meaning of “administrator”
8 Meaning of “administrator”
(1) An administrator, in relation to an administratively reviewable decision, is the person or body that makes (or is taken to have made) the decision under enabling legislation.
Note—
There are a number of circumstances in which a person or body is taken to have made a decision. See, for example, subsection (2) and sections 6 (2)–(5) and 9 (3) and (4).
(2) The person or body specified by enabling legislation as a person or body whose decisions are administratively reviewable decisions is taken to be the only administrator in relation to the making of an administratively reviewable decision even if some other person or body also had a role in the making of the decision.
s 8: Am 2008 No 77, Sch 1 [1]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [10]. Ins 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
9
When administrative review jurisdiction is conferred
9 When administrative review jurisdiction is conferred
9 When administrative review jurisdiction is conferred
(1) The Tribunal has administrative review jurisdiction over a decision (or class of decisions) of an administrator if enabling legislation provides that applications may be made to the Tribunal for an administrative review under this Act of any such decision (or class of decisions) made by the administrator:
(a) in the exercise of functions conferred or imposed by or under the legislation, or
(b) in the exercise of any other functions of the administrator identified by the legislation.
(2) If enabling legislation makes provision for applications to be made to the Tribunal in respect of an administratively reviewable decision subject to certain conditions, the Tribunal has jurisdiction under the enabling legislation only if those conditions are satisfied.
(3) A provision of enabling legislation that provides for a decision of an administrator to be administratively reviewable by the Tribunal under this Act extends to the following:
(a) a decision made by a person to whom the function of making the decision has been delegated,
(b) if the provision specifies the administrator by reference to the holding of a particular office or appointment—a decision by any person for the time being acting in, or performing any of the duties of, the office or appointment,
(c) a decision made by any other person authorised to exercise the function of making the decision.
(4) If an administrator makes an administratively reviewable decision by reason of holding or performing the duties of an office or appointment and then ceases to hold or perform the duties of the office or appointment, this Act has effect as if the decision had been made by:
(a) the person for the time being holding or performing the duties of that office or appointment, or
(b) if there is no person for the time being holding or performing the duties of that office or appointment or the office no longer exists—such person as the President (or another person authorised by the President) specifies.
(5) Nothing in this section permits administrative review jurisdiction to be conferred on the Tribunal by a statutory rule unless the conferral of jurisdiction by such means is expressly authorised by another Act.
s 9: Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [10]. Ins 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
10
10
10–46 (Repealed)
Part 1
Part 1
Part 1
47 (Repealed)
ch 3, pt 1 (previously Chapter 5, Part 1): Renumbered 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [12]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [13].
s 47: Am 2008 No 77, Sch 1 [11]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [13].
Part 2
Role of administrators
Part 2 Role of administrators
Part 2 Role of administrators
ch 3, pt 2 (previously Chapter 5, Part 2): Renumbered 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [12].
Division 1
Information concerning decision and review rights
Division 1 Information concerning decision and review rights
Division 1 Information concerning decision and review rights
48
Notice of decision and review rights to be given by administrators
48 Notice of decision and review rights to be given by administrators
48 Notice of decision and review rights to be given by administrators
(1) An administrator who makes an administratively reviewable decision must take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances to give any interested person notice, in writing, of the following:
(a) the decision, and
(b) the right of the person to have the decision reviewed.
(2) However, an administrator does not have to give a notice under subsection (1) in relation to:
(a) a decision that is taken by this or any other Act to be made because the administrator has failed to make a decision within the time limit for making the decision, or
(b) any of the following decisions, but only if the decision concerned does not adversely affect the interests of any interested person:
(i) a decision not to impose a liability, penalty or any kind of limitation on a person,
(ii) a decision making an adjustment to the level of periodic payments to be made to a person as a member of a class of persons where a similar adjustment is being made to the level of such payments to the other members of the class,
(iii) if legislation establishes several categories of entitlement to a monetary or other benefit—a decision that determines a person to be in the most favourable of those categories, or
(c) a decision made by an administrator following an internal review, or
(d) any other decision or class of decisions prescribed by the regulations for the purposes of this paragraph.
(3) A contravention of this section does not affect the validity of any decision.
s 48: Am 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [14] [15].
Division 2
Duty to give reasons on request
Division 2 Duty to give reasons on request
Division 2 Duty to give reasons on request
49
Duty of administrator to give reasons on request
49 Duty of administrator to give reasons on request
49 Duty of administrator to give reasons on request
(1) If an administrator makes an administratively reviewable decision, an interested person may make a written request to the administrator for the reasons for the decision.
(2) As soon as practicable (and in any event within 28 days) after receiving such a request, the administrator is to prepare a written statement of reasons for the decision and provide it to the person who requested the reasons.
(3) The statement of reasons is to set out the following:
(a) the findings on material questions of fact, referring to the evidence or other material on which those findings were based,
(b) the administrator’s understanding of the applicable law,
(c) the reasoning processes that led the administrator to the conclusions the administrator made.
(4) The regulations may:
(a) exclude any class of administratively reviewable decisions from the application of this section, or
(b) alter the period within which a statement of reasons under this section must be given.
s 49: Am 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [14].
50
Administrator may refuse reasons in certain cases
50 Administrator may refuse reasons in certain cases
50 Administrator may refuse reasons in certain cases
(1) An administrator may refuse to prepare and provide a statement of reasons requested by a person under this Division if:
(a) the administrator is of the opinion that the person is not entitled to be given the statement, or
(b) in the case of a decision the terms of which were recorded in writing and set out in a document that was provided to the person—the request was not made within 28 days after the person was provided with the document, or
(c) in any other case—the request was not made within a reasonable time after the decision was made.
(2) An administrator who refuses under subsection (1) to prepare and provide a statement of reasons must notify the person requesting the statement, in writing, of the administrator’s refusal and the reasons for the refusal as soon as practicable (and in any event within 28 days) after the request.
(3) The administrator is not to refuse to prepare and provide a statement of reasons if:
(a) in the case of a refusal based on subsection (1) (a)—the Tribunal declares, on an application made under section 51 (1), that the person who made the request was entitled to make the request, or
(b) in the case of a refusal based on subsection (1) (c)—the Tribunal declares, on an application made under section 51 (2), that the person who made the request did so within a reasonable time.
(4) If an administrator cannot refuse to comply with a request for a statement of reasons because of a decision of the Tribunal referred to in subsection (3), the administrator must prepare the written statement of reasons that was originally requested and provide it to the person who requested it as soon as practicable (and in any event within 28 days) after the Tribunal’s decision.
51
Tribunal may determine whether person entitled to reasons or made request within reasonable time
51 Tribunal may determine whether person entitled to reasons or made request within reasonable time
51 Tribunal may determine whether person entitled to reasons or made request within reasonable time
(1) The Tribunal may, on the application of a person who has been refused a statement of reasons under section 50 (1) (a), make an order declaring that the person was, or was not, entitled to make the request to which the notice relates.
(2) The Tribunal may, on the application of a person who has been refused a statement of reasons under section 50 (1) (c) on the basis that the person did not make the request within a reasonable time, make an order declaring that the person did make the request within a reasonable time.
52
Tribunal may order administrator to provide a statement of reasons or an adequate statement of reasons
52 Tribunal may order administrator to provide a statement of reasons or an adequate statement of reasons
52 Tribunal may order administrator to provide a statement of reasons or an adequate statement of reasons
(1) If an interested person has requested a statement of reasons under section 49 but has not received it within the period specified by or under that section, the Tribunal may (on the application of the person) order the administrator concerned to provide the statement of reasons within such time as may be specified in the order.
(2) If an interested person who requested a statement of reasons under section 49 is given an inadequate statement of reasons, the Tribunal may (on the application of the person) order the administrator concerned to provide an adequate statement of reasons within such time as may be specified in the order.
(3) For the purposes of this section, a statement of reasons is an adequate statement of reasons only if it sets out the matters referred to in section 49 (3).
Division 3
Internal reviews
Division 3 Internal reviews
Division 3 Internal reviews
53
Internal reviews
53 Internal reviews
53 Internal reviews
(1) Who may apply for an internal review If an administrator makes an administratively reviewable decision, an interested person may apply for an internal review of that decision under this section.
(2) Requirements for an application An application for an internal review is:
(a) to be in writing, and
(b) to be addressed to the administrator concerned, and
(c) to specify an address in Australia to which a notice under subsection (6) may be sent, and
(d) to be lodged at the office (or an office) of the administrator within 28 days (or such later date as the administrator may allow) after the person:
(i) if the person has requested reasons under section 49—was provided with a statement of reasons under section 49 or notified under section 50 of a refusal to provide reasons, or
(ii) if the person has not requested reasons under section 49—was notified of the making of the administratively reviewable decision, and
(e) to comply with such other requirements as may be prescribed by the regulations in respect of the making of applications for internal reviews.
(3) Who is to deal with an application? An application for an internal review of a decision is to be dealt with by an individual (other than the administrator) who is directed to do so by the administrator (the internal reviewer). The internal reviewer directed to deal with an application must be, as far as is practicable, an individual:
(a) who was not substantially involved in the process of making the decision under review, and
(b) who is an employee of the administrator or is an employee of the same agency or organisation within which the administrator is employed, and
(c) who is otherwise suitably qualified to deal with the issues raised by the application.
(4) Material to be considered In reviewing a decision, the internal reviewer is to consider any relevant material submitted by the applicant.
(5) Review of the application Following the internal review of the decision, the internal reviewer may:
(a) affirm the decision, or
(b) vary the decision, or
(c) set aside the decision and make a decision in substitution for the decision that is set aside.
(5A) Reviewer has functions of administrator In exercising a function under subsection (5), an internal reviewer is taken for all purposes to have the right to exercise the same functions under any relevant legislation or other law that the administrator had in making the decision being reviewed.
(5B) Reviewer to notify administrator of decision An internal reviewer must notify the administrator of the result of, and the reasons for, his or her decision under subsection (5) as soon as is practicable after making the decision.
(6) Notice of result of review and appeal rights Within 21 days after the application for the internal review is lodged (or such other period as the administrator and person agree on), the administrator must notify the applicant in writing of:
(a) the outcome of the internal review, and
(b) the reasons for the decision in the internal review, and
(c) the right of the person to have the decision reviewed by the Tribunal.
(7) Statement of reasons For the purposes of subsection (6), an applicant is notified of the reasons for a decision in an internal review only if the applicant is given a statement of reasons setting out the following:
(a) the findings on material questions of fact, referring to the evidence or other material on which those findings were based,
(b) the understanding of the internal reviewer of the applicable law,
(c) the reasoning processes that led the internal reviewer to the conclusions the reviewer made.
(8) Status of decisions made on internal review For the purposes of this Act, an administratively reviewable decision that is affirmed, varied or set aside and substituted under subsection (5) is:
(a) taken to have been made by the administrator (as affirmed, varied or substituted by the internal reviewer), and
(b) taken to have been made on the date on which the applicant is given a notice under subsection (6).
(9) When an internal review is finalised An internal review is taken to be finalised if:
(a) the applicant is notified of the outcome of the review under subsection (6), or
(b) the applicant is not notified of the outcome of the review within 21 days after the application for the review is lodged (or such other period as the administrator and person agree on).
Note—
Section 55 provides that an interested person may apply for an administrative review under this Act of an administratively reviewable decision once an internal review of the decision is taken to be finalised under this subsection.
(10) No internal reviews of decisions previously reviewed under this section A person is not entitled to a review under this section of any decision previously reviewed under this section or a decision made under subsection (5).
(11) Regulation-making powers The regulations may:
(a) prescribe requirements to be observed in relation to the conduct of an internal review under this section, or
(b) exclude any class of administratively reviewable decisions from the application of this section, or
(c) alter the period within which an internal review must be conducted or a notice given under this section.
s 53: Am 1997 No 141, Sch 1.1 [3]; 2000 No 33, Sch 1 [2]–[9]; 2008 No 77, Sch 1 [12]; 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [14] [16] [17].
Division 4
Guidelines
Division 4 Guidelines
Division 4 Guidelines
54
Guidelines for notices, reasons and internal reviews
54 Guidelines for notices, reasons and internal reviews
54 Guidelines for notices, reasons and internal reviews
(1) The regulations may prescribe guidelines with respect to any of the following:
(a) the giving of notices for the purposes of Division 1,
(b) the giving of reasons under Division 2,
(c) the conduct of internal reviews under Division 3.
(2) A person, in taking action under this Part, must have regard to any such guidelines as are then in force.
Part 3
Role of the Tribunal
Part 3 Role of the Tribunal
Part 3 Role of the Tribunal
55
Making of applications
55 Making of applications
55 Making of applications
(1) An application for an administrative review under this Act of an administratively reviewable decision may only be made by an interested person.
(2) Subject to enabling legislation, an application is to be made in the time and manner prescribed by the procedural rules.
(3) If the interested person was entitled to seek an internal review of the administratively reviewable decision, an application may not be made unless the person has duly applied for such an internal review and the review is taken to have been finalised under section 53 (9).
(4) However, the Tribunal may deal with an application for the administrative review of an administratively reviewable decision even though the applicant has not duly applied for an internal review to which the applicant was entitled if the Tribunal is satisfied that:
(a) the applicant made a late application for the internal review in circumstances where the person dealing with the application unreasonably refused to consider the application and the application to the Tribunal was made within a reasonable time following the administratively reviewable decision of the administrator concerned, or
(b) it is necessary for the Tribunal to deal with the application in order to protect the applicant’s interests and the application to the Tribunal was made within a reasonable time following the administratively reviewable decision of the administrator concerned.
(5) In determining whether a late application for internal review was unreasonably refused or whether an application to the Tribunal was made within a reasonable time for the purposes of subsection (4), the Tribunal is to have regard to:
(a) the time when the applicant became aware of the making of the decision, and
(b) in a case to which subsection (4) (a) applies—the period prescribed by or under section 53 for the lodging of an application for an internal review, and
(c) such other matters as it considers relevant.
(6) The Tribunal may also deal with an application even though the applicant has duly applied for an internal review of the decision to which the application relates, and the review is not finalised, if the Tribunal is satisfied that it is necessary for the Tribunal to deal with the application in order to protect the applicant’s interests.
s 55: Am 1997 No 141, Sch 1.1 [4]–[6]. Subst 2008 No 77, Sch 1 [13]. Am 2010 No 135, Sch 1 [1]–[3]. Subst 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [19].
56
56
56, 57 (Repealed)
58
Duty of administrator to lodge material documents with Tribunal where decision reviewed
58 Duty of administrator to lodge material documents with Tribunal where decision reviewed
58 Duty of administrator to lodge material documents with Tribunal where decision reviewed
(1) An administrator whose administratively reviewable decision is the subject of an application for review to the Tribunal must, within 28 days after receiving notice of the application, lodge with the Tribunal:
(a) a copy of any statement of reasons given to the applicant under section 49 (or, if no such statement was given to the applicant, a statement of reasons setting out the matters referred to in section 49 (3)), and
(a1) a copy of any statement of reasons for a decision in an internal review conducted in respect of the administratively reviewable decision, and
(b) a copy of every document or part of a document that is in the possession, or under the control, of the administrator that the administrator considers to be relevant to the determination of the application by the Tribunal.
(2) If the applicant has not been given a statement of reasons under section 49, the Tribunal may direct that a copy of the statement of reasons lodged with the Tribunal under subsection (1) (a) be given to the applicant within such period or periods as the Tribunal directs.
(3) If the Tribunal or President considers that a party to the proceedings would or might suffer hardship if the period of 28 days provided by subsection (1) is not shortened or extended, the Tribunal or President may, at the request of the party, make an order directing that the copies referred to in that subsection be lodged with the Tribunal within such shorter or extended period as is specified in the order.
(4) If the Tribunal or President considers that other particular documents (or that other documents included in a particular class of documents) may be relevant to the determination of the application, it may cause a notice in writing to be served on the administrator:
(a) stating that the Tribunal or President is of that opinion, and
(b) directing the administrator concerned to lodge with the Tribunal, before a date specified in the notice, a copy of each of those other documents that is in the possession, or under the control, of the administrator.
(5) The principal registrar of the Tribunal is to grant reasonable access to the applicant in the proceedings to any copy of a document lodged under this section by an administrator. Reasonable access includes, but is not limited to, enabling the applicant to make a photocopy of a document during ordinary business hours.
(6) If a party to proceedings before the Tribunal seeks a summons under the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 against an administrator for the production of any document and a copy of that document has been lodged with the Tribunal under subsection (1) or (4), the Tribunal may (on such conditions as it considers appropriate) direct the principal registrar of the Tribunal to grant the party access to its copy of the document instead of issuing a summons if access to the document could lawfully be required by the issue of a summons.
(7) Nothing in this section requires the disclosure of, or the granting of access to, any document (or a copy of a document) in contravention of any of the following:
(a) an order made under section 59 (Objections to lodgment),
(8) For the purposes of this section, a reference to a document in the possession of an administrator includes a reference to a document to which the administrator has an immediate right of access.
s 58: Am 1997 No 141, Sch 1.1 [7]; 2008 No 77, Sch 1 [17]; 2009 No 54, Sch 2.2 [1]; 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [14] [20]–[22].
59
Objections to lodgment
59 Objections to lodgment
59 Objections to lodgment
(1) An administrator may apply to the Tribunal before the expiry of the period referred to in section 58 (1) for an order that the administrator not be required to lodge a copy of a document under section 58.
(2) On any such application, the Tribunal may make an order that a copy of a document not be lodged with the Tribunal if:
(a) it is satisfied that section 67 (Privileged documents) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (as applied by section 67 of this Act) operates so as not to require the disclosure of the document, or
(b) it considers that, if an application were made under section 64 (Tribunal may restrict disclosures concerning procedures) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, it would be appropriate to make an order under that section prohibiting or restricting the publication or disclosure of evidence of the document.
s 59: Am 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [23].
60
Operation and implementation of decisions pending applications for administrative review
60 Operation and implementation of decisions pending applications for administrative review
60 Operation and implementation of decisions pending applications for administrative review
(1) Subject to this section, an application to the Tribunal for an administrative review under this Act of an administratively reviewable decision does not affect the operation of the decision under review or prevent the taking of action to implement that decision.
(2) On the application of any party to proceedings for an application for an administrative review under this Act of an administratively reviewable decision, the Tribunal may make such orders staying or otherwise affecting the operation of the decision under review as it considers appropriate to secure the effectiveness of the determination of the application.
(3) The Tribunal may make an order under this section only if it considers that it is desirable to do so after taking into account:
(a) the interests of any persons who may be affected by the determination of the application, and
(b) any submission made by or on behalf of the administrator who made the decision to which the application relates, and
(c) the public interest.
(4) While an order is in force under this section (including an order that has previously been varied on one or more occasions under this subsection), the Tribunal may, on application by a party to the proceedings, vary or revoke the order by another order.
s 60: Am 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [14] [24].
61
Restrictions on ordering stay of proceedings
61 Restrictions on ordering stay of proceedings
61 Restrictions on ordering stay of proceedings
(1) The Tribunal may not:
(a) make an order under section 60 unless the administrator who made the decision to which such an order would relate has been given a reasonable opportunity to make submissions in relation to the matter, or
(b) make an order varying or revoking an order in force under section 60 (including an order as varied) unless the following persons have been given a reasonable opportunity to make submissions in relation to the matter:
(i) the administrator who made the decision to which such an order would relate,
(ii) the person who requested the making of the order,
(iii) if the order has previously been varied by an order or orders under section 60—the person or persons who requested the making of the only, or the later or latest, such order.
(2) This section does not prevent the Tribunal from making an order under section 60 without giving to any person referred to in that section a reasonable opportunity to make submissions in relation to a matter if the Tribunal is satisfied that, because of the urgency of the case or otherwise, it is not practicable to give the person such an opportunity.
(3) If an order under this section is made without giving such an opportunity to the administrator who made the decision to which the application relates, the order does not take effect until a notice setting out the terms of the order is served on the administrator.
62
Conditions of stay order
62 Conditions of stay order
62 Conditions of stay order
(1) An order in force under section 60 (including an order that has previously been varied on one or more occasions) is subject to such conditions as are specified in the order.
(2) Any such order has effect:
(a) if a period for the operation of the order is specified in the order—until the expiration of that period or, if the application is decided by the Tribunal before the expiration of that period, until the decision of the Tribunal on the application takes effect, or
(b) if no period is so specified—until the decision of the Tribunal on the application takes effect.
63
Determination of administrative review by Tribunal
63 Determination of administrative review by Tribunal
63 Determination of administrative review by Tribunal
(1) In determining an application for an administrative review under this Act of an administratively reviewable decision, the Tribunal is to decide what the correct and preferable decision is having regard to the material then before it, including the following:
(a) any relevant factual material,
(b) any applicable written or unwritten law.
(2) For this purpose, the Tribunal may exercise all of the functions that are conferred or imposed by any relevant legislation on the administrator who made the decision.
(3) In determining an application for the administrative review of an administratively reviewable decision, the Tribunal may decide:
(a) to affirm the administratively reviewable decision, or
(b) to vary the administratively reviewable decision, or
(c) to set aside the administratively reviewable decision and make a decision in substitution for the administratively reviewable decision it set aside, or
(d) to set aside the administratively reviewable decision and remit the matter for reconsideration by the administrator in accordance with any directions or recommendations of the Tribunal.
s 63: Am 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [14] [26] [27].
64
Application of Government policy
64 Application of Government policy
64 Application of Government policy
(1) In determining an application for an administrative review under this Act of an administratively reviewable decision, the Tribunal must give effect to any relevant Government policy in force at the time the administratively reviewable decision was made except to the extent that the policy is contrary to law or the policy produces an unjust decision in the circumstances of the case.
(2) The Premier or any other Minister may certify, in writing, that a particular policy was Government policy in relation to a particular matter.
(3) The certificate is evidence of the Government policy concerned and the Tribunal is to take judicial notice of the contents of that certificate.
(4) In determining an application for an administrative review under this Act of an administratively reviewable decision, the Tribunal may have regard to any other policy applied by the administrator in relation to the matter concerned except to the extent that the policy is contrary to Government policy or to law or the policy produces an unjust decision in the circumstances of the case.
(5) In this section:
Government policy means a policy adopted by:
(a) the Cabinet, or
(b) the Premier or any other Minister,
that is to be applied in the exercise of discretionary powers by administrators.
s 64: Am 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [14] [28].
65
Power to remit matters to administrator for further consideration
65 Power to remit matters to administrator for further consideration
65 Power to remit matters to administrator for further consideration
(1) At any stage of proceedings to determine an application for an administrative review under this Act of an administratively reviewable decision, the Tribunal may remit the decision to the administrator who made it for reconsideration of the decision by the administrator.
(2) If a decision is so remitted to an administrator, the administrator may reconsider the decision and may:
(a) affirm the decision, or
(b) vary the decision, or
(c) set aside the decision and make a new decision in substitution for the decision set aside.
(3) If the administrator varies the decision:
(a) the application is taken to be an application for review of the decision as varied, and
(b) the person who made the application may either:
(i) proceed with the application for review of the decision as varied, or
(ii) withdraw the application.
(4) If the administrator sets the decision aside and makes a new decision in substitution for the decision set aside:
(a) the application is taken to be an application for review of the new decision, and
(b) the person who made the application may either:
(i) proceed with the application for review of the new decision, or
(ii) withdraw the application.
s 65: Am 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [14] [28].
66
Effect of administrative review decision
66 Effect of administrative review decision
66 Effect of administrative review decision
(1) A decision determining an application for an administrative review under this Act of an administratively reviewable decision takes effect on the date on which it is given or such later date as may be specified in the decision.
(2) If any such decision varies, or is made in substitution for, an administrator’s decision, the decision of the Tribunal is taken:
(a) to be the decision of the administrator (other than for the purposes of an administrative review under this Act), and
(b) to have had effect as the decision of the administrator on and from the date of the administrator’s actual decision, unless the Tribunal orders otherwise.
s 66: Am 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [14] [29] [30].
67
Application of certain provisions of Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013
67 Application of certain provisions of Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013
(c) for the purpose of any legal proceedings arising out of this Act, the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 or enabling legislation or any report of such proceedings, or
(d) with other legal excuse.
Maximum penalty:
(a) in the case of a corporation—100 penalty units, or
(b) in any other case—50 penalty units or imprisonment for 12 months, or both.
s 69: Am 2002 No 119, Sch 3 [18]. Subst 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [31].
70
Nature of proceedings for offences
70 Nature of proceedings for offences
70 Nature of proceedings for offences
Proceedings for an offence under this Act or the regulations may be dealt with summarily before the Local Court.
s 70: Subst 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [31].
71
Regulations
71 Regulations
71 Regulations
(1) The Governor may make regulations, not inconsistent with this Act, for or with respect to any matter that by this Act is required or permitted to be prescribed or that is necessary or convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to this Act.
(2) The regulations may create offences punishable by a penalty not exceeding 10 penalty units.
s 71: Am 2002 No 119, Sch 3 [19]; 2008 No 77, Sch 1 [19]–[21]; 2009 No 49, Sch 2.1 [1]; 2010 No 135, Sch 1 [4] [5]. Subst 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [31].
Schedule 1
Savings, transitional and other provisions
Schedule 1 Savings, transitional and other provisions
Schedule 1 Savings, transitional and other provisions
sch 1 (as originally enacted): Am 1998 No 169, Sch 2.1 [1]; 2000 No 72, Sch 1 [1]; 2013 No 37, Sch 3.1 [1]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [32].
sch 1 (previously Sch 5): Am 1997 No 141, Sch 1.1 [12]–[14]; 1998 No 48, Sch 1 [8] [9]; 1998 No 156, Sch 1 [26]–[30]; 1998 No 169, Sch 2.1 [3]; 2000 No 33, Sch 1 [16] [17]; 2000 No 72, Sch 1 [3] [4]; 2002 No 119, Sch 3 [33]; 2004 No 81, Sch 1 [3] [4]; 2005 No 31, Sch 1 [2] [3]; 2005 No 46, Sch 11.1 [17] [18]; 2006 No 30, Sch 9.2; 2008 No 77, Sch 1 [57] [58]; 2009 No 37, Sch 1.1 [5]; 2010 No 63, Sch 1.1 [7] [8]; 2010 No 135, Sch 1 [6] [7]; 2013 No 37, Sch 3.1 [3]; 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [34]–[36].
1A
References to ADT
1A References to ADT
1A References to ADT
A reference to the Administrative Decisions Tribunal or the Tribunal established by this Act (however expressed) in a provision of this Schedule that was inserted before the establishment day (within the meaning of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013) is a reference to the Administrative Decisions Tribunal that was formerly established under this Act when this Act was named the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997.
8A
Commencement of abolition provisions of amending Act for the purposes of this Schedule
8A Commencement of abolition provisions of amending Act for the purposes of this Schedule
8A Commencement of abolition provisions of amending Act for the purposes of this Schedule
For the avoidance of doubt, Schedules 2.1, 3.3, 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 to the amending Act are taken, for the purposes of this Schedule only, to have commenced on 6 October 1998.
11
Transitional arrangements pending making of rules of Commission
11 Transitional arrangements pending making of rules of Commission
11 Transitional arrangements pending making of rules of Commission
Until rules of the ADT are in force with respect to any matter for which rules may be made, the regulations may make provision with respect to that matter.
(1) Until the Rules of the ADT provide otherwise and subject to this Act, the Legal Services Tribunal Rules 1995 as in force immediately before the abolition of the Legal Services Tribunal continue in force as the rules of the ADT in respect of matters before the Legal Services Division of the Tribunal.
(3) Nothing in this clause prevents the future amendment or repeal of the rules.
13
Regulations made under substantially re-enacted provisions continue in force
13 Regulations made under substantially re-enacted provisions continue in force
13 Regulations made under substantially re-enacted provisions continue in force
(1) Subject to this clause, a regulation in force immediately before the commencement of a relevant amendment to the provision under which the regulation was made continues to have effect as a regulation made under the provision (as amended).
(2) Any reference in a regulation continued in force under subclause (1):
(a) to a court or tribunal from which jurisdiction is to be transferred to the ADT is to be read as a reference to the ADT, and
(b) to an appeal, complaint or other application to the court or tribunal is to be read as a reference to an application to the ADT.
(3) Nothing in this clause prevents the future amendment or repeal of any such regulation.
(4) In this clause, relevant amendment means an amendment made to any provision of another Act by the amending Act the effect of which is:
(a) to substantially re-enact the provision of the other Act, or
(b) to otherwise amend the provision by removing references to any court or tribunal and replacing them with references to the ADT.
14
Pending proceedings before an abolished body
14 Pending proceedings before an abolished body
14 Pending proceedings before an abolished body
(1) If proceedings were commenced but not heard by an abolished body before its abolition, the proceedings are taken to have been duly commenced in the ADT.
(2) If an abolished body had commenced to hear (but had not determined) a matter before its abolition, the person or persons hearing the matter:
(a) are to continue to hear the matter, and to determine the matter, sitting as the ADT, and
(b) have and may exercise, while sitting as the ADT under this clause, all the functions that the abolished body had immediately before its abolition.
(2A) A decision made under this clause is taken to be an appealable decision for the purposes of Part 1 of Chapter 7.
(3) This clause applies despite any contrary provision of this Act.
14A
Appeals to courts from decision of abolished bodies
14A Appeals to courts from decision of abolished bodies
14A Appeals to courts from decision of abolished bodies
(1) This clause applies to a decision of an abolished body in respect of which:
(a) an appeal to a court under a provision of another Act could have been lodged immediately before the commencement of the amendment of the provision by an appeal amendment, and
(b) no such appeal was pending before the court immediately before the commencement of the appeal amendment.
(2) Despite anything in section 30 of the Interpretation Act 1987 or any other law, no appeal lies from a decision to which this clause applies to the court that, immediately before the commencement of the appeal amendment, had jurisdiction to hear and determine an appeal from such a decision.
(3) However:
(a) a decision to which this clause applies is taken to be an appealable decision of the ADT for the purposes of Part 1 of Chapter 7, and
(b) a party to the proceedings before the abolished body concerned is taken to have been a party to proceedings in which an appealable decision of the ADT was made.
(4) In this clause, appeal amendment means an amendment to a provision of another Act by the amending Act the effect of which is to remove a right to appeal to a court from a decision of an abolished body.
15
Orders
15 Orders
15 Orders
(1) An order made under another Act by an abolished body, being an order having effect immediately before the abolition of the abolished body, is taken to be an order made by the ADT under the corresponding provision of that Act (as amended by the relevant amending Schedule) or this Act (as the case may be).
(2) Any application for an order made to an abolished body under another Act and not determined immediately before the commencement of the relevant amending schedule is to continue to be dealt with as if made under this Act (but only if there is a corresponding provision of this Act under which the order could be made).
(3) This clause is subject to the other provisions of this Schedule.
16
Expiration of current period
16 Expiration of current period
16 Expiration of current period
If, for any purpose, time had commenced to run under a provision of another Act in relation to an abolished body before, but had not expired before, the commencement of the relevant amending Schedule, it expires for the corresponding purpose under that Act (as amended by the relevant amending Schedule) or this Act, as the case may be, at the time at which it would have expired if the provision had not been amended by the relevant amending Schedule.
17
General savings
17 General savings
17 General savings
(1) If anything done or commenced under another Act in relation to an abolished body before the abolition of that body and still having effect or not completed immediately before that abolition could have been done or commenced under that Act (as amended by the relevant amending Schedule) or this Act if the relevant amending Schedule or this Act had been in force when the thing was done or commenced:
(a) the thing done continues to have effect, or
(b) the thing commenced may be completed, as if it had been done or commenced under the other Act (as amended) or this Act.
(2) This clause is subject to any express provision of this Act on the matter.
18
Definitions
18 Definitions
18 Definitions
In this Part:
ADT means the Administrative Decisions Tribunal established by this Act.
(1) This clause applies to proceedings before a court that:
(a) were instituted before the commencement of any relevant amendment, and
(b) have not been finally determined by the court before that commencement.
(2) Proceedings to which this clause applies are to be determined as if this Act and the amending Act had not been enacted.
(3) Accordingly, any rules, regulations or other law that would have been applicable to the proceedings had this Act and the amending Act not been enacted continue to apply to the proceedings as if neither Act had been enacted.
(4) In this clause:
court includes any tribunal, person or body authorised to determine any appeal.
relevant amendment means an amendment made to another Act by the amending Act the effect of which is to confer jurisdiction on the ADT to determine any matter that, immediately before the commencement of that amendment, could have been determined by the court concerned.
20
Regulations made under substantially re-enacted provisions continue in force
20 Regulations made under substantially re-enacted provisions continue in force
20 Regulations made under substantially re-enacted provisions continue in force
(1) Subject to this clause, a regulation in force immediately before the commencement of a relevant amendment to the provision under which the regulation was made continues to have effect as a regulation made under the provision (as amended).
(2) Any reference in a regulation continued in force under subclause (1):
(a) to a court or tribunal from which jurisdiction is to be transferred to the ADT is to be read as a reference to the ADT, and
(b) to an appeal, complaint or other application to the court or tribunal is to be read as a reference to an application to the ADT.
(3) Nothing in this clause prevents the future amendment or repeal of any such regulation.
(4) In this clause, relevant amendment means an amendment made to any provision of another Act by the amending Act the effect of which is:
(a) to substantially re-enact the provision of the other Act, or
(b) to otherwise amend the provision by removing references to any court or tribunal and replacing them with references to the ADT.
Part 4
Provisions consequent on enactment of Administrative Decisions Tribunal Legislation Further Amendment Act 1998
Part 4 Provisions consequent on enactment of Administrative Decisions Tribunal Legislation Further Amendment Act 1998
ADT means the Administrative Decisions Tribunal established by this Act.
22
Pending court proceedings
22 Pending court proceedings
22 Pending court proceedings
(1) This clause applies to proceedings before a court that:
(a) were instituted before the commencement of any relevant amendment, and
(b) have not been finally determined by the court before that commencement.
(2) Proceedings to which this clause applies are to be determined as if this Act and the amending Act had not been enacted.
(3) Accordingly, any rules, regulations or other law that would have been applicable to the proceedings had this Act and the amending Act not been enacted continue to apply to the proceedings as if neither Act had been enacted.
(4) In this clause:
court includes any tribunal, person or body authorised to determine any appeal.
relevant amendment means an amendment made to another Act by the amending Act the effect of which is to confer jurisdiction on the ADT to determine any matter that, immediately before the commencement of that amendment, could have been determined by the court concerned.
23
Regulations made under substantially re-enacted provisions continue in force
23 Regulations made under substantially re-enacted provisions continue in force
23 Regulations made under substantially re-enacted provisions continue in force
(1) Subject to this clause, a regulation in force immediately before the commencement of a relevant amendment to the provision under which the regulation was made continues to have effect as a regulation made under the provision (as amended).
(2) Any reference in a regulation continued in force under subclause (1):
(a) to a person, court or tribunal from which jurisdiction is to be transferred to the ADT is to be read as a reference to the ADT, and
(b) to an appeal, complaint or other application to the person, court or tribunal is to be read as a reference to an application to the ADT.
(3) Nothing in this clause prevents the future amendment or repeal of any such regulation.
(4) In this clause, relevant amendment means an amendment made to any provision of another Act by the amending Act the effect of which is:
(a) to substantially re-enact the provision of the other Act, or
(b) to otherwise amend the provision by removing references to any person, court or tribunal and replacing them with references to the ADT.
24
Pending proceedings in a Division of ADT on re-allocation of function
24 Pending proceedings in a Division of ADT on re-allocation of function
24 Pending proceedings in a Division of ADT on re-allocation of function
(1) This clause applies to proceedings:
(a) that are pending in the General Division of the ADT immediately before the commencement of Schedule 1 [22] to the amending Act, and
(2) Proceedings to which this clause apply are to be determined in the General Division in accordance with the provisions of Part 4 of Schedule 2 to this Act as in force immediately before the commencement of Schedule 1 [22] to the amending Act.
25
Appointments of Divisional Heads not affected
25 Appointments of Divisional Heads not affected
25 Appointments of Divisional Heads not affected
The amendments made to section 16 of this Act by the amending Act do not affect the validity of any appointment of a Divisional Head made under that section before its amendment.
26
Assignment of members to Divisions not affected
26 Assignment of members to Divisions not affected
26 Assignment of members to Divisions not affected
The amendments made to section 21 of this Act by the amending Act do not affect the validity of any assignment of a member to a Division made under that section before its amendment.
Part 5
Provisions consequent on enactment of Retail Leases Amendment Act 1998
Part 5 Provisions consequent on enactment of Retail Leases Amendment Act 1998
ADT means the Administrative Decisions Tribunal established by this Act.
28
Pending court proceedings
28 Pending court proceedings
28 Pending court proceedings
(1) This clause applies to proceedings before a tribunal or court concerning a retail tenancy dispute that:
(a) were instituted before the commencement of any relevant amendment, and
(b) have not been finally determined by the tribunal or court before that commencement.
(2) Proceedings to which this clause applies are to be determined as if this Act and the amending Act had not been enacted.
(3) Accordingly, any rules, regulations or other law that would have been applicable to the proceedings had this Act and the amending Act not been enacted continue to apply to the proceedings as if neither Act had been enacted.
(4) In this clause:
relevant amendment means an amendment made to another Act by the amending Act the effect of which is to confer jurisdiction on the ADT to determine any matter that, immediately before the commencement of that amendment, could have been determined by the court concerned.
Part 6
Provisions consequent on enactment of Administrative Decisions Tribunal Legislation Amendment Act 2000
Part 6 Provisions consequent on enactment of Administrative Decisions Tribunal Legislation Amendment Act 2000
Amending Act does not apply to or affect existing proceedings and other matters under this Act
30 Amending Act does not apply to or affect existing proceedings and other matters under this Act
30 Amending Act does not apply to or affect existing proceedings and other matters under this Act
(1) The amending Act does not apply to or affect:
(a) any internal review that has not been completed (or a right to seek an internal review arising) under section 53 of this Act immediately before the commencement of Schedule 1 [5] to the amending Act, and
(b) any appeal to an Appeal Panel that has not been heard or completed (or any right to so appeal arising) immediately before the commencement of Schedule 1 [1] to the amending Act, and
(c) any order made under section 75 (2) (b) of this Act before the commencement of Schedule 1 [11] to the amending Act that is in force immediately before that commencement, and
(d) an offence under section 126 of this Act that was committed or is alleged to have been committed (or any proceedings for any such offence that were commenced but have not been finally determined) before the commencement of Schedule 1 [13] to the amending Act, and
(e) any application to the Tribunal for a review under the Dangerous Goods Act 1975 that has not been heard or completed (or any right to so apply arising) immediately before the commencement of Schedule 2.2 to the amending Act.
(2) Accordingly, any rules, regulations or other law that would have been applicable to a matter referred to in subclause (1) (a)–(e) had the amending Act not been enacted continue to apply to that matter as if the amending Act had not been enacted.
31
Pending proceedings in a Division of ADT on re-allocation of function
31 Pending proceedings in a Division of ADT on re-allocation of function
31 Pending proceedings in a Division of ADT on re-allocation of function
(1) This clause applies to proceedings:
(a) that are pending in the General Division of the ADT immediately before the commencement of Schedule 1 [14] to the amending Act, and
(2) Proceedings to which this clause apply are to be determined in the General Division in accordance with the provisions of Part 4 of Schedule 2 to this Act as in force immediately before the commencement of Schedule 1 [14] to the amending Act.
Part 7
Provisions consequent on enactment of Administrative Decisions Tribunal Legislation Amendment (Revenue) Act 2000
Part 7 Provisions consequent on enactment of Administrative Decisions Tribunal Legislation Amendment (Revenue) Act 2000
existing tax objection determination means the determination of an objection by the Chief Commissioner of State Revenue under Division 1 of Part 10 of the Taxation Administration Act 1996 before the repeal of the repealed appeal provisions by the amending Act.
repealed appeal provisions means Division 2 of Part 10 of the Taxation Administration Act 1996 as in force immediately before the commencement of the new review provisions.
Amending Act applies to certain existing tax objection determinations
33 Amending Act applies to certain existing tax objection determinations
33 Amending Act applies to certain existing tax objection determinations
(1) This clause applies to any existing tax objection determination in respect of which:
(a) an appeal to the Supreme Court could have been lodged under the repealed appeal provisions immediately before the repeal of those provisions by the amending Act, and
(b) no such appeal was lodged with the Supreme Court immediately before that repeal.
(2) No appeal lies to the Supreme Court under the repealed appeal provisions in respect of an existing tax objection determination to which this clause applies.
(3) However, the new review provisions apply to any such determination as if those provisions had been in force at the time the determination was made under the Taxation Administration Act 1996.
34
Amending Act applies to certain appeal proceedings before Supreme Court
34 Amending Act applies to certain appeal proceedings before Supreme Court
34 Amending Act applies to certain appeal proceedings before Supreme Court
(1) This clause applies to an appeal in respect of an existing tax objection determination that was pending before (but not heard by) the Supreme Court under the repealed appeal provisions immediately before the repeal of those provisions by the amending Act.
(2) The new review provisions apply to an appeal to which this clause applies instead of the repealed appeal provisions.
(3) For the purposes of subclause (2), an appeal to which this clause applies is taken to be an application for review by the Supreme Court that was duly made under the new review provisions. Accordingly, the Supreme Court may determine or otherwise deal with the appeal as if it were an application for review made to it under the new review provisions.
35
Amending Act does not apply to or affect certain matters
35 Amending Act does not apply to or affect certain matters
35 Amending Act does not apply to or affect certain matters
(1) Subject to this Part, this Act and the revenue amendments do not apply to or affect:
(a) any determination of a taxpayer’s objection made by the Chief Commissioner of State Revenue under the Taxation Administration Act 1996 before the commencement of the revenue amendments, and
(b) any right to appeal to the Land and Environment Court under section 38A of the Land Tax Management Act 1956 that accrued before that commencement, and
(c) any other proceedings that were instituted before the commencement of the revenue amendments and have not been finally determined by a court before that commencement.
(2) Subject to this Part, any rules, regulations or other law that would have been applied to any determination, appeal right or proceedings referred to in subclause (1) had this Act and the amending Act not been enacted continue to apply to the objection, appeal right or proceedings as if this Act and the amending Act had not been enacted.
Part 8
Provisions consequent on enactment of Administrative Decisions Tribunal Amendment Act 2004
Part 8 Provisions consequent on enactment of Administrative Decisions Tribunal Amendment Act 2004
appeal abolition date, in relation to a right to appeal to an Appeal Panel, means:
(a) in relation to appeals against decisions of the Tribunal under the Architects Act 2003—the day on which Part 4A of that Act (as inserted by the amending Act) commences, and
(b) in relation to appeals against decisions of the Tribunal under the Surveying Act 2002—the day on which Part 6A of that Act (as inserted by the amending Act) commences, and
(c) in relation to appeals against decisions of the Tribunal under the Veterinary Practice Act 2003—the day on which Part 9A of that Act (as inserted by the amending Act) commences, and
(d) in relation to appeals against decisions of the Tribunal under the Veterinary Surgeons Act 1986—the day on which Part 6B of that Act (as inserted by the amending Act) commences.
existing right to appeal means a right to appeal to an Appeal Panel against a decision of the Tribunal that was in existence immediately before the appeal abolition date for that right (whether or not that right was exercised before that date).
37
Pending proceedings before an Appeal Panel
37 Pending proceedings before an Appeal Panel
37 Pending proceedings before an Appeal Panel
(1) This clause applies to proceedings before an Appeal Panel of the Tribunal that:
(a) were instituted in exercise of an existing right to appeal, and
(b) have not been finally determined by the Appeal Panel before the appeal abolition date for that appeal right.
(2) Subject to clause 39, proceedings to which this clause applies are to be determined as if the amending Act had not been enacted.
(3) Accordingly, any rules, regulations or other law that would have been applicable to the proceedings had the amending Act not been enacted continue to apply to the proceedings as if the amending Act had not been enacted.
38
Existing rights of appeal to Appeal Panel
38 Existing rights of appeal to Appeal Panel
38 Existing rights of appeal to Appeal Panel
(1) This clause applies to an existing right to appeal that had not been exercised before the appeal abolition date.
(2) No appeal lies to an Appeal Panel under an existing right to appeal to which this clause applies on or after the appeal abolition date, but lies instead to the Supreme Court under the new appeal provisions as if those provisions had been in force at the time the right to appeal first accrued.
(3) For the purposes of this clause, the new appeal provisions are:
(a) in relation to appeals against decisions of the Tribunal under the Architects Act 2003—Part 4A of that Act (as inserted by the amending Act), and
(b) in relation to appeals against decisions of the Tribunal under the Surveying Act 2002—Part 6A of that Act (as inserted by the amending Act), and
(c) in relation to appeals against decisions of the Tribunal under the Veterinary Practice Act 2003—Part 9A of that Act (as inserted by the amending Act), and
(d) in relation to appeals against decisions of the Tribunal under the Veterinary Surgeons Act 1986—Part 6B of that Act (as inserted by the amending Act).
(4) Despite anything in the Supreme Court Act 1970 or the rules of court made under that Act, an appeal made to the Supreme Court pursuant to this clause must be made within the same period provided by or under this Act for an appeal to an Appeal Panel immediately before the relevant appeal abolition date.
39
Interlocutory matters
39 Interlocutory matters
39 Interlocutory matters
(1) Section 24A (as inserted by the amending Act) extends to proceedings that were pending before (but not yet heard by) the Tribunal immediately before the commencement of that section.
(2) Section 113 (2A)–(2C) (as inserted by the amending Act) do not apply to the following:
(a) any right to appeal to an Appeal Panel that had accrued (but not been exercised) before the date on which those subsections commenced,
(b) any appeal to an Appeal Panel that was pending before the Panel immediately before the date on which those subsections commenced.
Part 9
Provisions consequent on enactment of Courts Legislation Amendment Act 2005
Part 9 Provisions consequent on enactment of Courts Legislation Amendment Act 2005
Constitution of Retail Leases Division of Tribunal
40 Constitution of Retail Leases Division of Tribunal
40 Constitution of Retail Leases Division of Tribunal
(1) The constitution of the Tribunal before the relevant day, for the purposes of exercising its functions under the Retail Leases Act 1994 in relation to unconscionable conduct claims, by any of the following members, and the assignment of any such member to the Retail Leases Division of the Tribunal, is validated:
(a) a member who would have satisfied the requirements of clause 1 (3) (a) of Part 3B of Schedule 2, if the amendments made by the amending Act had been in force at the time of the assignment,
(b) a member who, at the time of the assignment, had substantial experience or qualifications in commercial law.
(2) Anything done or omitted to be done before the relevant day by the Tribunal as so constituted, that would have been validly done or omitted if the Tribunal had been properly constituted, is also validated.
substantive amendment means any amendment made to this Act by the amending Act other than:
(a) the amendments made by Schedule 1 [57] and [58] to the amending Act, or
(b) amendments updating references to repealed or renamed legislation and any other amendments in the nature of statute law revision.
43
Application of amendments
43 Application of amendments
43 Application of amendments
(1) Except to the extent that a provision of this Part provides otherwise, a substantive amendment does not apply to or otherwise affect:
(a) any applications (including applications for internal reviews) that were made, but not finally determined, before the commencement of the amendment, or
(b) any proceedings that were commenced, but not finally determined, before the commencement of the amendment.
(2) The following substantive amendments extend to applications and proceedings that were made or commenced, but not finally determined, before the commencement of the substantive amendment concerned:
(a) the amendments made to sections 74 (3), 86 and 105,
(b) the amendment made to section 8,
(c) the amendments made to section 24A,
(d) the amendments made to sections 44 (1), 57 (1) and 67,
(e) the amendment made to section 73,
(f) the amendment that inserts section 79A,
(g) the amendments made to section 84,
(h) the amendment that inserts section 86A,
(i) the amendment made to section 88,
(j) the amendments made to section 102,
(k) the amendment made to section 104,
(l) the amendments made to sections 114 and 118C.
(3) The substantive amendments made to section 71:
(a) extend to proceedings that were commenced, but not finally determined, before the amendments commenced (existing proceedings), but
(b) do not affect any right or entitlement that an agent representing a party in existing proceedings had to represent the party immediately before the commencement of the amendments.
(4) The substantive amendment made to section 74 (4):
(a) extends to proceedings that were commenced, but not finally determined, before the commencement of the amendment, but
(b) does not extend to proceedings where an objection has been made under section 74 (4) as in force before the commencement of the amendment.
(5) The substantive amendment made to section 113 applies to appeals from appealable decisions of the Tribunal made on or after the day on which the amendment commences, but not to appealable decisions made before that day.
(6) The substantive amendments made to clauses 4 and 5 of Part 3 of Schedule 2 extend to proceedings that were pending (but not yet heard) before the commencement of the amendments.
(7) If a substantive amendment does not apply or extend to, or otherwise affect, an application, objection or proceedings, the application, objection or proceedings are to be determined or dealt with under this Act as if the substantive amendment had not been enacted.
44
Abolition of Subcommittees of Rule Committee
44 Abolition of Subcommittees of Rule Committee
44 Abolition of Subcommittees of Rule Committee
(1) Each Subcommittee for a Division established by the Rule Committee under section 97 is abolished on the day on which that section is repealed by the amending Act (the abolition day).
(2) Any person holding office as a member of any such Subcommittee immediately before the abolition day:
(a) ceases to hold office as such on that day, and
(b) is not entitled to any remuneration or compensation because of the loss of that office.
45
Interim rules of the Tribunal taken to be made by Rule Committee
45 Interim rules of the Tribunal taken to be made by Rule Committee
45 Interim rules of the Tribunal taken to be made by Rule Committee
and may be renamed, amended and repealed accordingly.
(2) Sections 39, 40 and 41 of the Interpretation Act 1987 do not apply to the rules taken to have been made by operation of this clause.
46
Existing regulations not affected
46 Existing regulations not affected
46 Existing regulations not affected
The amendment made to section 145 by the amending Act does not affect the continued validity of any regulations that are in force immediately before the commencement of the amendment.
Part 12
Provision consequent on enactment of Courts and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2009
Part 12 Provision consequent on enactment of Courts and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2009
Section 113 (2B) (as substituted by the Courts and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2009) does not apply to an application for leave to appeal against an interlocutory decision made before the substitution.
Part 13
Provision consequent on enactment of Courts Legislation Amendment Act 2010
Part 13 Provision consequent on enactment of Courts Legislation Amendment Act 2010
sch 2: Am 1997 No 98, Sch 2 [1] [2]; 1997 No 157, Sch 1; 1998 No 48, Sch 1 [4] [5]; 1998 No 169, Sch 2.1 [2]; 1999 No 85, Sch 2.2 [1] [2]; 2000 No 33, Sch 1 [14]; 2000 No 97, Sch 4.1; 2000 No 72, Sch 1 [2]; 2001 No 53, Sch 2.1; 2002 No 119, Sch 3 [31] [32]; 2003 No 3, Sch 2.1 [1]–[6]; 2003 No 19, Sch 2.1; 2003 No 87, Sch 3.1 [1]–[5]; 2003 No 89, Sch 2.1; 2004 (584), cl 13 (am 2005 (420), Sch 1 [1]); 2004 No 79, Sch 3.2 [2] [3]; 2004 No 112, Sch 6.1; 2005 No 31, Sch 1 [1]; 2005 No 46, Sch 11.1 [5]–[16]; 2005 No 108, Sch 2.1; 2005 No 111, Sch 8; 2006 No 116, Sch 3.1; 2008 No 77, Sch 1 [45]–[53]; 2008 No 116, Sch 2.1 [1] [2]; 2009 No 49, Sch 2.1 [2]; 2009 No 54, Sch 2.2 [3]–[5]; 2010 No 63, Sch 1.1 [6]; 2010 No 127, Sch 4.1 [1] [2]; 2011 No 19, Sch 2.1; 2011 No 26, Sch 2.1; 2011 No 54, Sch 2.1; 2011 No 70, Sch 2.1; 2012 No 74, Sch 3.1 [1] [2]; 2013 No 31, Sch 3.1; 2013 No 37, Sch 3.1 [2]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [32].
sch 3: Am 1997 No 141, Sch 1.1 [10] [11]; 1998 No 48, Sch 1 [6] [7]; 1998 No 156, Sch 1 [25]; 1999 No 94, sec 7 (3) and Sch 5, Part 3; 2000 No 33, Sch 1 [15]; 2008 No 77, Sch 1 [54] [55]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [32].
sch 4: Am 2008 No 77, Sch 1 [56]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [32].
Schedule 5
Schedule 5
Schedule 5
(Renumbered as Schedule 1)
sch 5: Renumbered as Sch 1, 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [33].
Source text: opening excerpt
Sourced from legislation.nsw.gov.au, CC BY 4.0.
1 Name of Act
1 Name of Act
1 Name of Act
This Act is the Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997.
s 1: Am 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [2].
2 Commencement
2 Commencement
2 Commencement
This Act commences on a day or days to be appointed by proclamation.
3 Objects of Act
3 Objects of Act
3 Objects of Act
The objects of this Act are as follows:
(a) to provide a preliminary process for the internal review of administratively reviewable decisions before the administrative review of such decisions by the Tribunal under this Act,
(b) to require administrators making administratively reviewable decisions to notify persons of decisions affecting them and of any review rights they might have and to provide reasons for decisions of administrators on request,
(c) to foster an atmosphere in which administrative review by the Tribunal is viewed positively as a means of enhancing the delivery of services and programs,
(d) to promote and effect compliance by administrators with legislation enacted by Parliament for the benefit of the citizens of New South Wales.
s 3: Subst 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [3].
4 Definitions
4 Definitions
4 Definitions
(1) In this Act:
administrative review jurisdiction of the Tribunal—see section 9.
enabling legislation means legislation (other than this Act or any statutory rules made under this Act) that:
(a) provides for applications to be made to the Tribunal with respect to a specified matter or class of matters, or
(b) otherwise enables the Tribunal to exercise functions with respect to a specified matter or class of matters.
function includes a power, authority or duty, and exercise a function includes perform a duty.
Offences are created for improper disclosure of information obtained under the Act (s 69) and proceedings for offences are summary (s 70). The Governor may make regulations, including offence-creating regulations carrying up to 10 penalty units (s 71). A lengthy Schedule 1 contains savings, transitional and validation provisions arising from the 1997 merger of specialist tribunals, the 2013 creation of NCAT, and numerous subsequent amendments.
In short, the ADR Act is not substantive law; it is the procedural overlay that converts a statutory right to “review” into a concrete, time-limited, document-driven process before an independent merits-review body.
Who it affects
Two primary classes are affected: administrators and interested persons.
“Administrator” is defined in s 8(1) as the person or body that makes (or is taken to have made) the administratively reviewable decision under the enabling legislation. Section 8(2) deems the person or body expressly identified in the enabling legislation to be the sole administrator even if others participated. Because s 9(3) extends review jurisdiction to decisions made by delegates, acting officers and authorised persons, the net catches a wide range of public servants, statutory office-holders and agency employees. Section 9(4) ensures continuity when the original decision-maker leaves office.
“Interested person” means anyone entitled under the enabling legislation to apply to the Tribunal for review (s 4(1)). This is deliberately tied to the conferring statute so that standing is not created by the ADR Act itself. Consumers, licensees, applicants for benefits, landowners, professionals facing disciplinary action, and businesses affected by regulatory decisions are all typical applicants.
The Act also touches NCAT itself (defined in s 4(1) by reference to the Civil and Administrative Tribunal), the President of the Tribunal, and any person given access to lodged documents under s 58(5). Because s 67 applies provisions of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (CAT Act) concerning Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 and privileged documents, information holders and privilege claimants are indirectly regulated. Finally, the broad savings and transitional provisions in Schedule 1 continue to affect parties to legacy proceedings commenced under the former Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 and the specialist tribunals abolished in 1998.
Key duties and rights
Duties of administrators
Give written notice of decision and review rights (s 48(1)).
Provide a statement of reasons within 28 days of request (s 49(2)), containing the statutory triad of findings of fact, understanding of the law, and reasoning (s 49(3)).
Conduct an internal review when properly applied for (s 53), by an officer who was not substantially involved, is suitably qualified and is from the same agency (s 53(3)). The reviewer may affirm, vary or set aside and substitute (s 53(5)) and is taken to exercise the administrator’s full statutory functions (s 53(5A)).
Lodge reasons, internal-review statement and relevant documents with the Tribunal within 28 days (s 58(1)), or within a shorter or longer period ordered by the Tribunal or President (s 58(3)).
Comply with any guidelines prescribed under s 54.
Rights of interested persons
Receive notice and reasons (ss 48, 49).
Apply for internal review within 28 days (or longer if allowed) (s 53(2)(d)).
Apply to the Tribunal once internal review is finalised (s 55(3)), or earlier in the limited circumstances set out in s 55(4) or (6).
Seek a stay or other interim order (s 60(2)).
Obtain access to documents lodged under s 58 (s 58(5)) and, in appropriate cases, copies instead of summonses (s 58(6)).
Receive a decision that is the “correct and preferable” one on all material then before the Tribunal (s 63(1)).
Tribunal powers
The Tribunal’s jurisdiction is entirely derivative (s 9). Once seized, it may make stay orders (s 60), order further reasons (s 52), determine entitlement to reasons (s 51), remit for reconsideration at any stage (s 65), and exercise all functions of the administrator (s 63(2)). It must apply relevant Government policy unless contrary to law or productive of injustice (s 64(1)).
Penalties and enforcement
The only offence created by the Act itself is improper disclosure of information obtained in the exercise of functions under the ADR Act, the CAT Act or enabling legislation (s 69). The maximum penalty is 100 penalty units for a corporation and 50 penalty units or 12 months’ imprisonment (or both) for an individual. Proceedings are dealt with summarily before the Local Court (s 70).
Breach of the notice obligation in s 48(3) does not invalidate the underlying decision, preserving administrative certainty. Failure to provide reasons within time can be met by a Tribunal order under s 52(1). Inadequate reasons can be cured by order under s 52(2). Contempt-type sanctions are not created by the ADR Act; enforcement occurs through the CAT Act’s contempt powers (applied indirectly) or through ordinary judicial review where the Tribunal’s own orders are ignored.
Regulations may create additional offences carrying up to 10 penalty units (s 71(2)). No civil cause of action for damages arises from breach of the Act’s procedural requirements.
How it interacts with other laws
The ADR Act is expressly parasitic on “enabling legislation” (defined in s 4(1)). Jurisdiction exists only if that legislation authorises applications to the Tribunal for administrative review (s 9(1)). Section 9(5) prohibits conferral of jurisdiction by statutory rule unless an Act expressly authorises it.
The Act is inextricably linked with the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013. Section 4(1) defines “Tribunal”, “President” and “procedural rules” by reference to the CAT Act. Sections 58(7), 59(2) and 67 apply CAT Act ss 64, 66 and 67 (GIPA Act effect and privileged documents). Procedural rules for lodgment and service are made under the CAT Act (s 68). Fees are prescribed under the CAT Act (note to s 55(2)).
The ADR Act interacts with the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 through the applied provisions in s 67. It displaces or supplements merits-review routes in older statutes; the 1997 and 1998 amendments abolished the Boxing Appeals Tribunal, Community Services Appeals Tribunal, Equal Opportunity Tribunal, Legal Services Tribunal, Schools Appeals Tribunal and Veterinary Surgeons Disciplinary Tribunal, routing their jurisdictions through the (then) ADT and now NCAT.
Section 6(3)–(5) deem decisions made without power, refusals based on perceived lack of power, and deemed refusals through lapse of time to be decisions “made under” the enabling legislation, thereby preserving review rights that might otherwise be lost at common law. Section 64 requires the Tribunal to apply Government policy, creating a direct interface with executive policy instruments.
Recent changes and why
The most significant recent change was effected by the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Legislation Amendment Act 2013 (No 94). That Act renamed the statute from the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 to the Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997, repealed the bulk of the tribunal-constitution and procedural chapters (former Chapters 2, 4 and 5), substituted new objects (s 3), redefined “administratively reviewable decision”, “administrator”, “decision” and “Tribunal”, and inserted the current Part 3 (Role of the Tribunal). The changes were required to dismantle the standalone ADT and fold its merits-review functions into the new unified Civil and Administrative Tribunal. The 2013 amendments also aligned time limits, document-lodgment obligations and stay criteria with the CAT Act’s overarching procedural philosophy.
Subsequent minor amendments have refined time periods (e.g. s 53), clarified the status of internal-review decisions (s 53(8)), and updated cross-references. The long Schedule 1 has been repeatedly expanded to deal with transitional issues arising from the successive repeal of specialist tribunals and the 2013 NCAT reforms. These changes were driven by the policy objective of reducing tribunal fragmentation, lowering costs, and creating a single point of contact for administrative review in New South Wales.
Court challenges and controversies
Because the ADR Act is procedural, most litigation has concerned the limits of its interaction with enabling legislation. Courts have examined whether particular decisions fall within the statutory definition of “administratively reviewable decision” (s 7) and whether conduct (as opposed to a formal decision) can be reviewed (s 7(2) and the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 example). The breadth of the s 6 definition of “decision” has been tested in cases involving deemed refusals and decisions claimed to be a nullity; s 6(3) expressly brings decisions made beyond power within review jurisdiction, avoiding the common-law difficulties that once attended jurisdictional error.
Controversy has surrounded the compulsory internal-review precondition (s 55(3)). The Tribunal’s discretion under s 55(4) to dispense with internal review where the agency has unreasonably refused a late application or where the applicant’s interests require immediate protection has generated satellite litigation about what constitutes “reasonable time” and “unreasonable refusal”. Stay-order jurisprudence under s 60 has produced debate about the weight to be given to the public interest and to the administrator’s submissions (s 60(3)), especially in licensing and planning matters where third-party interests are engaged.
The obligation to apply Government policy (s 64) has been criticised for potentially fettering the Tribunal’s merits-review function. Certificates issued by the Premier or a Minister under s 64(2) are conclusive evidence, raising rule-of-law concerns when policy is opaque or hastily made. In practice, however, the “unjust decision” exception in s 64(1) has operated as a safety valve.
Confidentiality and non-publication orders under the applied CAT Act provisions (s 67) have been contested in disciplinary and child-protection matters. The offence in s 69 has rarely been prosecuted, but its existence influences how agencies handle sensitive material lodged under s 58.
Gotchas
Most practitioners assume that every government decision is reviewable; it is not. Jurisdiction exists only if the enabling legislation expressly or impliedly confers it (s 9(1)). Many older statutes still contain outdated references to the former ADT or to rights of appeal to courts that have been extinguished by the transitional provisions in Schedule 1.
Internal review is not optional if the applicant was entitled to it (s 55(3)). However, the Tribunal’s power to excuse non-compliance (s 55(4)–(6)) is discretionary and fact-sensitive; late applications for internal review that are refused on reasonable grounds will usually bar the Tribunal route. The 28-day lodgment period for documents under s 58(1) is strict but can be shortened or extended by the Tribunal or President on hardship grounds (s 58(3)). Administrators frequently overlook the obligation to lodge the internal-review statement of reasons (s 58(1)(a1)), which can lead to adjournment applications and costs orders.
Section 53(5A) gives the internal reviewer the full statutory powers of the original administrator. This is often missed; a reviewer can therefore impose harsher conditions or withdraw a benefit entirely, exposing applicants to “review risk”.
The stay power (s 60) is not automatic and requires an express application. Tribunals are increasingly reluctant to grant unconditional stays in revenue or licensing cases where collection or public protection is at stake. The “correct and preferable decision” test in s 63(1) is not confined to the material that was before the administrator; fresh evidence is routinely admitted, which can surprise agencies that treat the Tribunal as a mere appeal court.
Finally, the broad savings provisions in Schedule 1 continue to trap the unwary. A decision made by an abolished tribunal before 1998 may still be treated as an “appealable decision” of the Tribunal for the purposes of the old appeal pathways (cll 14A, 14(2A)). Transitional clauses from the 2000 revenue amendments, the 2004 appeal-abolition amendments and the 2008 and 2013 reforms must be checked in any matter with a long decision history.
How to comply
For administrators
Maintain an up-to-date register of decisions that are reviewable under each item of enabling legislation.
Draft standard-form notices that satisfy s 48(1) and any guidelines made under s 54.
Implement internal procedures ensuring that the internal reviewer meets the independence and qualification criteria in s 53(3).
Prepare reasons statements that address the three mandatory elements in s 49(3); boilerplate will be held inadequate under s 52(3).
Create a document-management protocol that can identify and copy every relevant document within 28 days (or the period ordered under s 58(3)).
Train decision-makers on the breadth of the s 6 definition, especially deemed refusals and decisions beyond power.
When policy is relevant, obtain and file the Premier’s or Minister’s certificate under s 64(2) at the earliest opportunity.
For applicants and their advisers
Identify the exact enabling legislation and the precise provision that confers review rights; cite it in every application.
Apply for internal review within 28 days of notification or receipt of reasons (s 53(2)(d)); keep records of posting or lodgment.
If reasons are refused or not supplied, consider a prompt application under s 51 or s 52 rather than risking a late Tribunal application.
When seeking a stay, file affidavit evidence addressing each of the s 60(3) factors (interests of affected persons, administrator’s submissions, public interest).
Request all s 58 documents immediately upon lodgment and scrutinise them for gaps; consider a Tribunal direction under s 58(4) for additional classes of documents.
In the substantive hearing, lead any fresh evidence that bears on the “correct and preferable” outcome; the Tribunal is not limited to the original record.
Monitor Government policy changes; be ready to argue that a policy produces an unjust result in the particular circumstances (s 64(1)).
Compliance is best achieved by treating the ADR Act as a statutory code that displaces general administrative-law assumptions. Early identification of the enabling legislation, meticulous attention to time limits, and proactive document management remain the three practical pillars that separate successful from unsuccessful participants in the review process.
interested person means a person who is entitled under enabling legislation to make an application to the Tribunal for an administrative review under this Act of an administratively reviewable decision.
internal review means an internal review conducted under section 53.
legislation means an Act or a statutory rule.
lodge a document includes file a document.
President means the President of the Tribunal.
procedural rules has the same meaning as in the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013.
Tribunal means the Civil and Administrative Tribunal.
(2) A reference in this Act to the exercise by the Tribunal of its functions in relation to enabling legislation includes a reference both to its functions under the enabling legislation and its functions under this Act in relation to the enabling legislation.
(3) A reference (however described) in this Act to a decision made under enabling legislation is taken, in relation to an administratively reviewable decision, to include a reference to any decision made in the exercise of functions identified by the enabling legislation.
(4) Notes included in this Act do not form part of this Act.
s 4: Am 1997 No 141, Sch 1.1 [1]; 1998 No 156, Sch 1 [1] [2]; 2002 No 119, Sch 3 [1]–[3]; 2005 No 46, Sch 11.1 [1]; 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [4]–[7].
5
5 (Repealed)
5
s 5: Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [8].
6 Meaning of “decision”
6 Meaning of “decision”
6 Meaning of “decision”
(1) General meaning A decision includes any of the following:
(a) making, suspending, revoking or refusing to make an order or determination,
(b) giving, suspending, revoking or refusing to give a certificate, direction, approval, consent or permission,
(c) issuing, suspending, revoking or refusing to issue a licence, authority or other instrument,
(d) imposing a condition or restriction,
(e) making a declaration, demand or requirement,
(f) retaining, or refusing to deliver up, an article,
(g) doing or refusing to do any other act or thing.
(2) Decision made under enabling legislation For the purposes of this Act, a decision is made under enabling legislation if it is made in the exercise (or purported exercise) of a function conferred or imposed by or under the enabling legislation.
(3) Decisions made without power For the purposes of this Act (and without limiting subsection (2)), a decision that purports to be made under enabling legislation is taken to be a decision made under the enabling legislation even if the decision was beyond the power of the decision-maker to make it.
(4) Failure to make decision on basis that beyond power For the purposes of this Act (and without limiting subsection (2)), a refusal of a decision-maker to make a decision under enabling legislation because the decision-maker considers that the decision concerned cannot lawfully be made under the enabling legislation is taken to be a decision made under the enabling legislation to refuse to make the decision requested.
(5) Failure to make a timely decision taken to be failure to make a decision For the purposes of this Act, a failure by a decision-maker to make a decision within the period specified by the enabling legislation concerned for making the decision is taken to be a decision by the decision-maker at the end of the period to refuse to make the decision.
s 6: Am 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [9].
7 Meaning of “administratively reviewable decision”
7 Meaning of “administratively reviewable decision”
7 Meaning of “administratively reviewable decision”
(1) An administratively reviewable decision is a decision of an administrator over which the Tribunal has administrative review jurisdiction.
(2) For the avoidance of doubt (and without limiting subsection (1) or section 6):
(a) the conduct of an administrator (or a refusal by an administrator to engage in conduct) is an administratively reviewable decision if enabling legislation identifies that conduct or refusal as conduct or refusal over which the Tribunal has administrative review jurisdiction, and
(b) in its application to any such conduct or refusal by an administrator, any reference in this Act (however expressed) to an administrator making an administratively reviewable decision includes a reference to an administrator engaging or refusing to engage in the conduct.
Note—
The jurisdiction conferred on the Tribunal by section 55 of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 is an example of administrative review jurisdiction of the Tribunal over conduct.
s 7: Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [10]. Ins 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
8 Meaning of “administrator”
8 Meaning of “administrator”
8 Meaning of “administrator”
(1) An administrator, in relation to an administratively reviewable decision, is the person or body that makes (or is taken to have made) the decision under enabling legislation.
Note—
There are a number of circumstances in which a person or body is taken to have made a decision. See, for example, subsection (2) and sections 6 (2)–(5) and 9 (3) and (4).
(2) The person or body specified by enabling legislation as a person or body whose decisions are administratively reviewable decisions is taken to be the only administrator in relation to the making of an administratively reviewable decision even if some other person or body also had a role in the making of the decision.
s 8: Am 2008 No 77, Sch 1 [1]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [10]. Ins 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
9 When administrative review jurisdiction is conferred
9 When administrative review jurisdiction is conferred
9 When administrative review jurisdiction is conferred
(1) The Tribunal has administrative review jurisdiction over a decision (or class of decisions) of an administrator if enabling legislation provides that applications may be made to the Tribunal for an administrative review under this Act of any such decision (or class of decisions) made by the administrator:
(a) in the exercise of functions conferred or imposed by or under the legislation, or
(b) in the exercise of any other functions of the administrator identified by the legislation.
(2) If enabling legislation makes provision for applications to be made to the Tribunal in respect of an administratively reviewable decision subject to certain conditions, the Tribunal has jurisdiction under the enabling legislation only if those conditions are satisfied.
(3) A provision of enabling legislation that provides for a decision of an administrator to be administratively reviewable by the Tribunal under this Act extends to the following:
(a) a decision made by a person to whom the function of making the decision has been delegated,
(b) if the provision specifies the administrator by reference to the holding of a particular office or appointment—a decision by any person for the time being acting in, or performing any of the duties of, the office or appointment,
(c) a decision made by any other person authorised to exercise the function of making the decision.
(4) If an administrator makes an administratively reviewable decision by reason of holding or performing the duties of an office or appointment and then ceases to hold or perform the duties of the office or appointment, this Act has effect as if the decision had been made by:
(a) the person for the time being holding or performing the duties of that office or appointment, or
(b) if there is no person for the time being holding or performing the duties of that office or appointment or the office no longer exists—such person as the President (or another person authorised by the President) specifies.
(5) Nothing in this section permits administrative review jurisdiction to be conferred on the Tribunal by a statutory rule unless the conferral of jurisdiction by such means is expressly authorised by another Act.
s 9: Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [10]. Ins 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
10
10–46 (Repealed)
10
s 10: Am 2008 No 77, Sch 1 [2]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [10].
ch 2, pt 1 (s 11): Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
ch 2, pt 1 (s 11): Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
ch 2, pt 2: Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 12: Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 13: Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 14: Am 2008 No 107, Sch 1. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 14A: Ins 1998 No 48, Sch 1 [1]. Am 2002 No 53, Sch 2.1 [1]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 15: Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 16: Am 1998 No 156, Sch 1 [3]–[6]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 17: Am 1998 No 48, Sch 1 [2] [3]; 2002 No 7, Sch 7; 2005 No 46, Sch 11.1 [2] [3]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 18: Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
ch 2, pt 3: Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 19: Am 2002 No 53, Sch 2.1 [2]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 20: Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 21: Am 1998 No 156, Sch 1 [7]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 22: Am 2002 No 119, Sch 3 [4]–[10]; 2009 No 49, Sch 2.1 [1]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 23: Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 24: Am 2000 No 33, Sch 1 [1]; 2002 No 119, Sch 3 [11] [12]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 24A: Ins 2004 No 81, Sch 1 [1]. Am 2008 No 77, Sch 1 [3]–[5]; 2010 No 63, Sch 1.1 [1]–[3]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 25: Am 1998 No 156, Sch 1 [8]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 26: Am 2008 No 77, Sch 1 [6]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
ch 2, pt 4: Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 27: Am 2008 No 77, Sch 1 [7]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 28: Am 1998 No 156, Sch 1 [9]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
ch 2, pt 5, div 1: Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
ch 2, pt 5, div 2 (ss 29–35): Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
ch 2, pt 5, div 2 (ss 29–35): Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 36: Am 2004 No 79, Sch 3.2 [1]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
ss 37–40: Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 41: Am 2008 No 77, Sch 1 [8]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 42: Am 1997 No 141, Sch 1.1 [2]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 43: Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 44: Am 2008 No 77, Sch 1 [9] [10]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 45: Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
s 46: Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [11].
Part 1
Part 1
47 (Repealed)
ch 3, pt 1 (previously Chapter 5, Part 1): Renumbered 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [12]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [13].
s 47: Am 2008 No 77, Sch 1 [11]. Rep 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [13].
Part 2 Role of administrators
Part 2 Role of administrators
Part 2 Role of administrators
ch 3, pt 2 (previously Chapter 5, Part 2): Renumbered 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [12].
Division 1 Information concerning decision and review rights
Division 1 Information concerning decision and review rights
Division 1 Information concerning decision and review rights
48 Notice of decision and review rights to be given by administrators
48 Notice of decision and review rights to be given by administrators
48 Notice of decision and review rights to be given by administrators
(1) An administrator who makes an administratively reviewable decision must take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances to give any interested person notice, in writing, of the following:
(a) the decision, and
(b) the right of the person to have the decision reviewed.
(2) However, an administrator does not have to give a notice under subsection (1) in relation to:
(a) a decision that is taken by this or any other Act to be made because the administrator has failed to make a decision within the time limit for making the decision, or
(b) any of the following decisions, but only if the decision concerned does not adversely affect the interests of any interested person:
(i) a decision not to impose a liability, penalty or any kind of limitation on a person,
(ii) a decision making an adjustment to the level of periodic payments to be made to a person as a member of a class of persons where a similar adjustment is being made to the level of such payments to the other members of the class,
(iii) if legislation establishes several categories of entitlement to a monetary or other benefit—a decision that determines a person to be in the most favourable of those categories, or
(c) a decision made by an administrator following an internal review, or
(d) any other decision or class of decisions prescribed by the regulations for the purposes of this paragraph.
(3) A contravention of this section does not affect the validity of any decision.
s 48: Am 2013 No 94, Sch 2.2 [14] [15].
Division 2 Duty to give reasons on request
Division 2 Duty to give reasons on request
Division 2 Duty to give reasons on request
49 Duty of administrator to give reasons on request
49 Duty of administrator to give reasons on request
49 Duty of administrator to give reasons on request
(1) If an administrator makes an administratively reviewable decision, an interested person may make a written request to the administrator for the reasons for the decision.
(2) As soon as practicable (and in any event within 28 days) after receiving such a request, the administrator is to prepare a written statement of reasons for the decision and provide it to the p
This is an opening excerpt, not the complete document.