(a) The plaintiff inappropriately dealt with youth and finances. (Paragraph 6)
(b) The plaintiff took offensive photographs of Under 19 rugby players. (Paragraphs 5, 7 and 55)
(c) The plaintiff is not suitable to be involved in a schoolboy rugby match where minors are involved. (Paragraphs 5, 6 and 55)
(d) The plaintiff was suspected of criminal conduct by the Police because they executed a search warrant. (Paragraph 7)
(e) The plaintiff had been under investigation by taskforce ARGUS (QLD Police Service) for many years. (Paragraph 8)
(f) The plaintiff is a paedophile. (Paragraphs 5, 6, 8 and 55)
(g) That because of the plaintiff's involvement in a series of distasteful incidents whilst involved in UQ Gatton, and local Armidale rugby clubs the DDRU Management Committee terminated his employment as Under 19 representative coach. (Paragraphs 5 and 8)
(h) The plaintiff fled to America to avoid investigation by the Police. (Paragraph 8)
(i) The plaintiff had an improper pre-disposition for young males. (Paragraphs 8 and 55)
(j) The plaintiff is a sexual pervert. (Paragraphs 5, 6, 8, 32, 35, 47, 49 and 55)
(k) The plaintiff extracted money from Under 19 team players and has not accounted for it. (Paragraph 23)
(l) The plaintiff has committed the DDRU to expenses without authority. (Paragraphs 21, 22, 25, 29, 30 and 48)
(m) The plaintiff is dishonest. (Paragraphs 6, 21, 22, 23, 25 and 55)
(n) By presenting bills to the DDRU for payment which had been processed by UQ Gatton Campus the plaintiff committed fraud. (Paragraph 26)
(o) The plaintiff is a fraudster. (Paragraphs 26 and 55)
(p) The plaintiff stole the 2002 DDRU under 19 Rugby jerseys. (Paragraphs 27, 35, 50 and 55)
(q) The plaintiff is a thief. (Paragraphs 23 and 55)
(r) The plaintiff failed to act in accordance with Queensland Treasury requirements when organising a raffle. (Paragraphs 30, 35, 50 and 55)
(s) The plaintiff's behaviour following the defeat of the under 19 XV was obsessive and immature. (Paragraph 31)
(t) The plaintiff photographed the genital regions of a number of under 19 XV players whilst they were urinating. (Paragraphs 32, 35, 49 and 55)
(u) The plaintiff harassed an under 19 player. (Paragraphs 33, 53 and 33)
(v) The plaintiff took photographs of naked rugby players when he should not have. (Paragraphs 47 and 55)
(w) The plaintiff misappropriated money of the DDRU. (Paragraph 55)