The applicant pay the first respondent's costs for the amended plans served on 8 December 2004. The costs are those incurred by the first respondent for Mr O'Conner's assessment and further report on the amended plans and any associated legal costs, but not administration costs.

[2]

Each party pay its own costs for the notice of motion of 6 December 2004.

[3]

The first respondent pay the applicant's costs for the notice of motion of 27 April 2005, as agreed or assessed.

[4]

I certify that this and the 6 preceding pages are a true copy of the reasons for the judgment of The Honourable Justice B. J. Preston.

[5]

DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

Prestige Building Services Pty Ltd

Respondent/Defendant:

Coffs Harbour City Council and Anor

Cases Cited (4)

CITATION : Prestige Building Services Pty Ltd v Coffs Harbour City Council and Anor [2006] NSWLEC 72

Prestige Building Services Pty Ltd v Coffs Harbour City Council [2005] NSWLEC 435 (10 August 2005); CASES CITED: Prestige Building Services Pty Ltd v Coffs Harbour City Council and Anor [2005] NSWLEC 707 (13 December 2005); Statewide Development Pty Limited v Minister for Infrastructure and Planning [2005] NSWLEC 353 (1 July 2005)

[2005] NSWLEC 707

[2005] NSWLEC 353

Cited By (3)

Grant v Kiama Municipal Council

Hunter Environment Lobby Inc v Minister for Planning

Mike George Planning Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council