Murphy on behalf of the Jinibara People v State of Queensland

Note:

• 75m and 105m Elevation Level in metres above sea level referenced to AHD (Australian Height Datum) derived from 5m Digital Elevation Model. On ground coordinates of EL 75m AHD and EL 105m AHD subject to survey. 75m EL and 105m EL sourced from Seqwater, Queensland (August 2012). Maps of the Determination Area SCHEDULE 2 - AREAS NOT FORMING PART OF THE DETERMINATION AREA The following areas of land and waters are wholly excluded from the Determination Area on the grounds that they have been the subject of a previous exclusive possession act, as defined in s 23B of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), that none of ss 47, 47A or 47B of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) applied to them at the time at which the Application was made and therefore, in accordance with s 61A of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), could not be claimed:

1. The waters situated within the area covered by any previous exclusive possession act as defined in the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).
2. The land or waters on which any public work, as defined in s 253 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), is constructed, established or situated, and to which ss 23B(7) and 23C(2) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) and/or s 21 of the Native Title (Queensland) Act 1993 (Qld) applies, together with any adjacent land or waters in accordance with s 251D of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).
3. Specifically, the land or waters described in Item 2 above includes the whole of the land or waters described as: (a) that part of Lot 809 on NPW751 formerly described as Lot 80 on SL6396 (the Mount Glorious VHF tower and shelter site); and (b) areas A and B within Mount Mee State Forest as shown on the attached map labelled "Mt Mee Previous Exclusive Possession Acts (Public Works and Historical Tenure)".
4. Specifically, the land or waters described in Item 2 above include the location of the weirs referred to in Items 4(a) - 4(d) below, which are operated and owned by Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority (trading as Seqwater) ABN 75 450 239 876: (a) in Kilcoy Creek, Kilcoy Creek Weir as shown on the attached map labelled "S1"; (b) in Obi Obi Creek: (i) Maleny Weir as shown on the attached map labelled "S2"; and (ii) Kings Lane Weir aka Obi Obi Creek Weir as shown on the attached map labelled "S3"; (c) in the Stanley River, Stanley River (Woodford) Weir as shown on the attached map labelled "S4"; (d) in the South Maroochy River, South Maroochy Intake Weir, as shown on the attached map labelled "S5". For the avoidance of doubt, in respect of this weir, there are areas of land and waters hatched in red on the map labelled "S5" that are covered or affected by the operation of section 251D of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (namely Lot 7 on AP19232 and part of Lot 1008 on CG134), these being areas the use of which is (or was) necessary for, or incidental to, the construction, establishment or operation of the weir. Mt Mee Previous Exclusive Possession Acts (Public Works and Historical Tenure) Seqwater Public Works Maps SCHEDULE 3 -- NATIVE TITLE HOLDERS The native title holders for the Determination Area are the Jinibara People who are the biological descendants of the following people: (a) Wanambi James McKenzie (who was the father of Wangirmau Johnny McKenzie and the paternal grandfather of Gaiarbau Willie McKenzie); (b) Dil:l (who was the father of Jowalmel Fanny Mason, wife of Wangirmau Johnny McKenzie); (c) Edward Ross (who was the father of Dick Dahtell Ross); and (d) Menvil Wanmuarn and his wife, Kitty (who was the daughter of King Sambo and Queen Beauty), who identify as and are accepted by the Jinibara People as Jinibara People according to Jinibara traditional law and custom. SCHEDULE 4 - OTHER INTERESTS IN THE DETERMINATION AREA The nature and extent of Other Interests in relation to the Determination Area are the following, as they exist at the date of this Determination:
5. The rights and interests of the parties under the Deed of Agreement between the Jinibara People Aboriginal Corporation, the Applicant and the State of Queensland dated 30 October 2012 providing for the exercise of native title rights and interests in selected Protected Areas.
6. The rights and interests of the State of Queensland in Reserves, the rights and interests of the trustees of those Reserves and of the persons entitled to access and use those Reserves for the respective purpose for which they are reserved.
7. The rights and interests of the State of Queensland and the Somerset Regional Council to access, use, operate and maintain the area delineated as road on Plan SP164074 for its dedicated purpose and the rights and interests of the general public to access and use the road.
8. The rights and interests of the State of Queensland and the Moreton Bay Regional Council to access, use, operate and maintain the area delineated as road on Plan SP124807 for its dedicated purpose and the rights and interests of the general public to access and use the road.
9. The rights and interests of Moreton Bay Regional Council, Sunshine Coast Regional Council and Somerset Regional Council as local governments for those parts of the Determination Area within their respective Local Government Areas, including: (a) their powers, functions, responsibilities and jurisdiction under a Local Government Act; (b) their rights and interests under any interest in land or waters within the Determination Area including under any lease, licence, access agreement, easement or Reserve in the Determination Area; (c) the rights to use, operate, maintain, replace, restore, remediate, repair and otherwise exercise all other rights as the owners and operators of infrastructure, structures, earthworks, access works, facilities and other improvements within the Determination Area; (d) the rights under any agreements between them and any third party which relates to land or water in the Determination Area; and (e) the rights of their employees, agents and contractors to enter upon the Determination Area for the purpose of performing their powers and responsibilities under paragraphs (a)-(d).
10. The rights and interests of Brisbane City Council as local government for that part of the Determination Area within their Local Government Area, including its powers, functions, responsibilities and jurisdiction under the City of Brisbane Act 2010 (Qld) and any rights and interests it or employees or agents have to enter land to perform those functions.
11. The rights and interests of Energex Limited: (a) as the owner and operator of electricity distribution, generation and transmission facilities within the Determination Area; (b) as an Electricity Entity under the Electricity Act 1994 (Qld), including but not limited to: (i) as the holder of a distribution authority; and (ii) rights to enter the Determination Area by its employees, agents or contractors to exercise any of the rights and interests referred to in this paragraph; and to inspect, maintain and manage any distribution, generation and transmission facilities in the Determination Area; and (c) in relation to any connection contract, way leave agreement, permit to occupy or easement relating to the Determination Area.
12. The interests of Queensland Electricity Transmission Corporation Limited (trading as Powerlink Queensland) ACN 078 849 233 as an electricity entity exercising statutory functions, powers or rights and as owner and operator of electricity transmission facilities and associated infrastructure situated upon the Determination Area, including but not limited to the right to enter upon the Determination Area at any reasonable time in order to access, use, maintain, repair, replace, upgrade, or otherwise deal with those facilities and infrastructure in accordance with the law.
13. The rights and interests of Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority (trading as Seqwater) ABN 75 450 239 876: (a) as trustee of Lot 83 on Crown Plan S311786 (R1070 Stanley, Reserve for Camping and Water); (b) in relation to any agreement with any third party which relates to land or waters in the Determination Area existing or entered into on or before the date of this Determination; and (c) to enter the Determination Area by its employees, agents or contractors to exercise any of the rights and interests referred to in this Item 9 of Schedule 4.
14. The rights and interests of Telstra Corporation Limited: (a) as the owner or operator of telecommunications facilities within the Determination Area; (b) created pursuant to the Post and Telegraph Act 1901 (Cth), the Telecommunications Act 1975 (Cth), the Australian Telecommunications Corporation Act 1989 (Cth), the Telecommunications Act 1991 (Cth) and the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth) including rights: (i) to inspect land; (ii) to install and operate telecommunication facilities; and (iii) to alter, remove, replace, maintain, repair and ensure the proper functioning of its existing and any new telecommunication facilities; (c) for its employees, agents or contractors to access its telecommunications facilities in, and in the vicinity of, the Determination Area, in the performance of their duties; and (d) under any lease, licence, access agreement or easement relating to its telecommunication facilities in the Determination Area.
15. The rights and interests of Forestry Plantations Queensland Pty Limited in and under Plantation Licence No 713331865.
16. Any existing public access to and enjoyment of, the following places in the Determination Area: (a) waterways; (b) beds and banks or foreshores of waterways; (c) stock routes; and (d) areas that were public places at the end of 31 December 1993, pursuant to s 212(2) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) and s 18 of the Native Title (Queensland) Act 1993 (Qld).
17. The rights and interests of the State of Queensland or any other person (as applicable) existing by reason of the force and operation of the laws of the State of Queensland, including those existing by reason of the following legislation or any regulation, statutory instrument, declaration, plan, authority, permit, lease or licence made, granted, issued or entered into under that legislation: (a) the Land Act 1994 (Qld); (b) the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Qld); (c) the Petroleum Act 1923 (Qld) and Petroleum and Gas (Production and Safety) Act 2004 (Qld); (d) the Forestry Act 1959 (Qld); (e) the Water Act 2000 (Qld); (f) the Integrated Planning Act 1997 (Qld) or Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (Qld); (g) the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (Qld); and (h) the Fire and Rescue Services Act 1990 (Qld) and the Ambulance Service Act 1991 (Qld).
18. Any other rights and interests of members of the public arising under the common law, including but not limited to the following: (a) any subsisting public right to fish; (b) the public right to navigate; and (c) the public's right to access and use the formed roads on Lot 401 on Plan C311073, namely Storrs Road, Fortune Avenue and Jannaii Court.
19. Any other rights and interests held by the State or Commonwealth, or by reason of the force and operation of the Laws of the State or Commonwealth. SCHEDULE 5 -- EXTERNAL BOUNDARY Described as commencing at the westernmost corner of Lot 1239 on NPW1105 and extending generally north easterly along the boundary of that lot, northern boundaries of Lot 1 AP19232, again boundaries of Lot 1239 on NPW1105 to a corner of that lot at Longitude 152.816277° East, Latitude 26.537327° South; then north easterly to a north western corner of Lot 4 on AP19232 at Longitude 152.836465° East, Latitude 26.522126° South; then generally easterly and generally north easterly along northern and western boundaries of that lot to a corner at Longitude 152.868677°; then easterly and northerly again along boundaries of Lot 1239 on NPW1105 to again the western boundary of Lot 4 on AP19232; then northerly again along the boundary of Lot 4 on AP19232 to again the boundary Lot 1239 on NPW1105; then northerly, westerly and generally northerly along the boundaries of that lot, a southern boundary of Lot 4 on AP19232, southern and western boundaries of again Lot 1239 on NPW1105 to Lot 2 on AP19232; then generally northerly and easterly along southern, western and northern boundaries of that lot to northern boundary of again Lot 1239 on NPW1105; then generally easterly along the boundary of that lot, northern boundaries of again Lot 2 on AP19232 and again northern boundaries of Lot 1239 on NPW1105 to the western boundary of Lot 1239 on NPW1106; then generally northerly along a western boundary of that lot, western boundary of again Lot 2 on AP19232 and western and northern boundaries of again Lot 1239 on NPW1105 to Longitude 152.887569° East; then northerly passing through Longitude 152.887757° East, Latitude 26.494490° South to the south eastern corner of Anderson Road; then generally northerly along eastern boundaries of that road to the southern boundary of Browns Creek Road; then generally south easterly along boundaries of that road, southern boundaries of Gold Creek Road and western boundaries of Bunya Road to Latitude 26.517695° South; then generally southerly passing through the following coordinate points: Longitude (East) Latitude (South) 152.945840 26.532245 152.940584 26.537915 152.938233 26.539436 152.935468 26.542478 152.934361 26.545106 152.933670 26.546074 152.933532 26.547595 152.934223 26.550776 152.936989 26.557414 152.939340 26.561978 152.941691 26.566403 152.942244 26.572488 152.941553 26.577743 152.940723 26.582030 152.937542 26.587839 152.934223 26.594477 152.930489 26.601806 152.918596 26.617295 152.908224 26.626975 152.906979 26.630156 152.906288 26.635411 152.903384 26.639007 152.900341 26.645783 152.899512 26.650762 152.899605 26.656017 152.902001 26.663485 152.902277 26.664176 152.905043 26.673165 152.910022 26.680356 152.911405 26.686718 152.913894 26.696952 152.913756 26.700409 152.914171 26.705526 152.916522 26.718249 152.916522 26.736780 152.916245 26.748397 152.918040 26.751710

Then southerly to the southern bank of the Mooloolah River at Longitude 152.918070° East; then generally easterly along banks of that river to Longitude 152.956365° East; then south westerly to the intersection of the eastern boundary of Mount Mellum Road and the southern boundary of Paper Road; then generally south easterly along boundaries of Paper Road to the western boundary of Old Gympie Road; then generally southerly along boundaries of that road, western boundaries of Beerburrum Woodford Road and again Old Gympie Road to the northern boundary of Alcock Road; then generally south westerly and generally westerly along boundaries of that road to the southernmost south western corner of Lot 15 RP843783; then southerly to the western boundary of Easement A on RP104359; and generally southerly along the boundary of that easement, and western boundaries of Easements A on RP104355, A on RP104360, A on RP104618, A on RP104616, A on RP104615, B on RP169368, A on RP105540, B on RP105540, A on RP105208, A on RP105200, A on RP105209, A on RP166401 and A on RP105210 and onwards to the north western corner of A on RP105211, a point on the southern boundary of the King Street (Caboolture Connection Road); then generally north westerly along boundaries of that road and southern boundaries of D'Aguilar Highway to the western boundary of Campbell's Pocket Road; then generally south westerly along boundaries of that road and northern boundaries of Mount Mee Road to the western boundary of Hewitt Road; then generally south westerly and generally southerly passing through the following coordinate points: Longitude (East) Latitude (South) 152.746044 27.089097 152.741409 27.095276 152.731369 27.105702 152.727121 27.118446 152.727121 27.135824 152.728279 27.152429 152.727121 27.165945 152.706654 27.186026 152.697385 27.197225 152.693524 27.217693 152.688890 27.231981 152.679235 27.253607 152.679621 27.266737 152.686959 27.278322 152.700089 27.289907 152.716694 27.293769 152.733300 27.300720 152.746816 27.311919 152.760332 27.319643 152.768055 27.329683 152.772689 27.344744 152.769214 27.358260 152.774234 27.374865 152.803197 27.402284 152.818258 27.411166 152.825209 27.423909 152.824050 27.443991 152.820189 27.458279 152.819267 27.459654 152.810920 27.472954 152.803197 27.482222 152.795473 27.499986 152.790839 27.511185 152.794315 27.523928 152.794701 27.532810

Then southerly to the intersection of the south eastern corner of Lot 45 on S31614 and the northern bank of the Brisbane River, then generally south westerly and generally north westerly along the eastern bank of that River, the eastern bank of the former Brisbane River ,now the subject of Lake Wivenhoe and again the eastern bank of the Brisbane River to Latitude 26.896572° South; then northerly and north easterly, passing through Longitude 152.319629° East, Latitude 26.840408° South to a point on the western boundary Monsildale Creek Road at Latitude 26.772928° South; then generally northerly and generally easterly along boundaries of that road, northern boundaries of Louisavale Road to the south western corner of Lot 2 on RP163086, then generally easterly along the northern boundaries of Louisavale Road, Monsildale Creek, again Louisavale Road (also being the southern boundary of the northern severance of Lot 2 on RP163086) to Longitude 152.403816° East; then north easterly passing through Longitude 152.405421° East, Latitude 26.749056° South, to intersect a point on the eastern boundary of Kilcoy Murgon Road and the northern boundary of an unnamed track, being the north western corner of corner of Lot 2 on AP19208; then generally south easterly along boundaries of that lot and track to Longitude 152.480550° East; then generally south easterly and generally easterly again along northern boundaries of an unnamed track passing through Lot 792 on NPW746 and Lot 102 on NPW746 to Mt Kilcoy Road; then easterly along the northern boundaries of that road to an eastern boundary of Lot 102 on NPW746 at Longitude 152.568169° East; then northerly and generally north-easterly along boundaries of that lot to a corner at Longitude 152.598820° East, Latitude 26.740418° South; then generally easterly passing through the following coordinate points: Longitude (East) Latitude (South) 152.619799 26.734666 152.641728 26.730950 152.660839 26.729212 152.713548 26.728587

then easterly to the intersection of the eastern bank of the Mary River and the northern boundary of Maleny Kenilworth Road; then generally easterly along boundaries of that road to the western boundary of Curramore Road; then generally northerly along boundaries of that road, western boundaries of Kidaman Creek road, western boundaries of Suicide Road and , again western boundaries of Kidaman Creek Road to Latitude 26.654696° South; then again northerly passing through Longitude 152.795978° East, Latitude 26.621352° South to the southern boundary of Lot 1239 on NPW1105 at Longitude 152.797163° East; then generally westerly and generally northerly along the boundaries of that lot back to the commencement point. Data Reference and Source External boundary description is based in part on spatial data sourced from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (QLD) August 2012. Cadastral data and Lot on Plan details sourced from Department of Natural Resources and Mines (QLD) August 2102. River banks based where possible on Casement data sourced from Department of Natural Resources and Mines (QLD) August 2012 or Topographic vector data is © Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia) 2006. 75m and 105m Elevation Level in metres above sea level referenced to AHD (Australian Height Datum) derived from 5 m Digital Elevation Model sourced from Seqwater (QLD) September 2012. On ground coordinates of EL 75m AHD and EL 105m AHD subject to survey. Roads and road names based on Casement data sourced from Department of Natural Resources and Mines (QLD) August 2012. Tracks as described through Forest Reserve and State Forest based on 100K raster topographic data sourced from Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia). Reference Datum Geographical coordinates are referenced to the Geocentric Datum of Australia 1994 (GDA94), in decimal degrees and are based on spatial reference data acquired from the various custodians at the time. Use of Coordinates Where coordinates are used within the description to represent cadastral or topographical boundaries or the intersection with such, they are intended as a guide only. As an outcome to the custodians of cadastral data continuously recalculating the geographic position of their data based on improved ground survey and data maintenance procedures, it is not possible to accurately define such a position other than by detailed ground survey. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 6128 of 1998

BETWEEN: KENNETH MURPHY AND NOEL BLAIR ON BEHALF OF THE JINIBARA PEOPLE

QUEENSLAND BULK WATER SUPPLY AUTHORITY (TRADING AS SEQWATER)

JUDGE: REEVES J DATE: 20 NOVEMBER 2012 PLACE: WOODFORD

Introduction 1 On 17 May 1770 Captain Cook sailed north, past the bay he was to call Morton's Bay (later to become Moreton Bay). His journal for that day records that he observed "several smokes" as he looked inland. It is not inconceivable that the smoke Captain Cook observed was the result of fires lit by the forebears of today's Jinibara people. It was not, however, until approximately 70 years later that the first official contact between European settlers and Aboriginal people in the claim area occurred. The first Europeans in the area were squatters who sought to claim the land for sheep and cattle grazing. Thus started a process of rapid settlement of the area in which local indigenous people were initially retained as station workers and later moved out of the area to designated Aboriginal settlements. Remarkably, notwithstanding the enormous pressures they have experienced, the Jinibara People were able to maintain their social and cultural integrity and come together to make the current application to this Court to recognise their native title in their lands. 2 The Jinibara application was originally lodged with the National Native Title Tribunal (the NNTT) on 29 September 1998. Following amendment of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (the Act) in 1998, the Jinibara application was transferred to the Federal Court. Since the time of its commencement the Jinibara application has undergone considerable refinement. In January 2000 an amended application was filed to remove overlaps with claims filed by the Wakka Wakka People and the Undumbi People. In 2006 the application was further amended to remove the overlap with the Jagera People's claim. The overlap with the Turrbal People's claim was removed from the Jinibara application in April 2010. Technical errors in mapping descriptions were corrected by amendment of the claim in May 2010. Finally, the Jinibara application was amended under consent orders made on 26 October 2012 to clearly identify those parcels of land and waters that remained the subject of the application. 3 The parties recently informed the Court that, following mediation conducted through the NNTT, they had reached agreement on the terms of a proposed consent determination of native title. That agreement was evidenced by filing an agreement under s 87 of the Act (the s 87 Agreement) together with draft consent orders.

Section 87 of the Act 4 In circumstances where the parties to native title proceedings reach written agreement and certain other conditions are met the Court is empowered, under s 87 of the Act, to make an order in, or consistent with, the terms of the parties' agreement, without holding a hearing. In Nelson v Northern Territory of Australia (2010) 190 FCR 344; [2010] FCA 1343 (Nelson), I set out the various conditions that the parties need to meet in order to have the Court make a consent determination of native title under s 87: see at [3]-[4]. The first three of those conditions, and the evidence that shows the parties to these proceedings have met them, are as follows: (a) First, subsection 87(1) requires that the period specified in the notice given under s 66 of the Act must have ended. The Jinibara application was notified by the Native Title Registrar on 13 December 2000. The period specified in that notice expired on 12 March 2001. Accordingly, this condition is met. (b) Secondly, the agreement of the parties must relate to the whole of the proceedings, part of the proceedings, or a matter arising out of the proceedings: s 87(1)(a). As the agreement of the parties relates to the whole of the proceeding as reflected in the amendments made on 26 October 2012, this condition, too, has been met. (c) Thirdly, s 87(1)(b) of the Act requires that the agreement must be reduced to writing, signed by the parties, and filed with the Court. The filing of the s 87 Agreement on 1 November 2012 demonstrates that each of these matters has been met. 5 The fourth condition prescribed by s 87(1)(c) of the Act requires the Court to be satisfied that an order in, or consistent with, the terms of the determination sought by the parties would be within the power of the Court. An order will be within the power of the Court if it is consistent with s 94A of the Act, the rights and interests included in the proposed determination are recognisable by the common law of Australia and there is no other determination in existence over the area the subject of the proposed determination. 6 Section 94A requires the Court, in making a determination, to set out the details of the matters mentioned in s 225 of the Act. Section 225 outlines the content of a determination of native title as: A determination of native title is a determination whether or not native title exists in relation to a particular area (the determination area) of land and waters and, if it does exist, a determination of: (a) who the persons, or each group of persons, holding the common or group rights comprising the native title are; and (b) the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests in relation to the determination area; and (c) the nature and extent of any other interests in relation to the determination area; and (d) the relationship between the rights and interests in paragraphs (b) and (c) (taking into account the effect of this Act); and (e) to the extent that the land or waters in the determination area are not covered by a non-exclusive agricultural lease or a non-exclusive pastoral lease - whether the native title rights and interests confer possession, occupation, use and enjoyment of that land or waters on the native title holders to the exclusion of all others. (Emphasis in original.) 7 I have examined the proposed determination contained in the s 87 Agreement and I am satisfied that each of the matters referred to in s 225(a) to (e) of the Act is appropriately articulated therein and the rights and interests so described are recognisable by the common law of Australia. The history of the Jinibara application set out in [2] above demonstrates that all overlaps with the claims of other native title claim groups have been removed. Furthermore, I am satisfied from the contents of the National Native Title Register kept under Pt 8 of the Act that no previous determination of native title has been made over the area the subject of the proposed determination. 8 I am therefore satisfied that a determination in the terms sought by the parties would be within the power of the Court. 9 Finally, before the Court makes a determination consistent with the terms of the parties' agreement, it must be satisfied that it is appropriate to do so: s 87(1A) of the Act. These words: have been held to confer on the Court a discretion which, subject to the Court being satisfied about the pre-conditions mentioned above, is unfettered. However, like all discretions conferred on the Court, it must be exercised judicially and in exercising it, the Court must have regard to the objects of the Act, one of the most important being the resolution of disputes by negotiation and agreement, rather than litigation: Munn v Queensland (2001) 115 FCR 109 at [26] and [28]. See Nelson at [7]. 10 In Nelson (at [8-[13]), I canvassed the authorities that identified the factors that the Court will routinely have regard to in determining this question. Beyond setting out the concluding summary, it is not necessary for me to repeat what I said in Nelson. The concluding summary was as follows (Nelson at [14] but excluding case references): It follows from all these considerations that the central issue in an application for a consent determination under s 87 is whether there exists a free and informed agreement between the parties. In this respect, the process followed by the State party respondent, particularly how it goes about assessing the underlying evidence as to the existence of native title is critical. Other critical factors, all directed to the processes that lead to the agreement and what was agreed, that have been previously identified by the Court include: whether the parties have independent and competent legal representation..; whether the terms of the proposed order are unambiguous and clear…; and whether the agreement has been preceded by a mediation process… 11 As to the second of these critical factors, I am satisfied from an examination of the terms of the proposed consent determination that it is unambiguous and clear. 12 As to the other factors identified in the concluding summary in Nelson (above), I note that the agreement reached by the parties in this case is partly founded on the expert reports of Dr Redmond (an anthropologist), Dr Skyring (an historian) and Mr Robbins (an archaeologist). In addition to those reports, I have been assisted by the contents of the original and supplementary submissions filed by the Applicant. 13 In those submissions, the Applicant submitted that it is appropriate for the Court to exercise its discretion to make the orders sought because: (a) the parties have freely entered into the s 87 agreement informed by their involvement in the claim process, including mediation and negotiation, and having had the opportunity to consider and assess the evidence relied upon by the Applicant; (b) the parties have had the benefit of independent legal advice and have engaged in the claim resolution process rationally and in good faith; (c) the State of Queensland has taken a "real interest" in the proceedings on behalf of the broader community; and (d) the process by which the parties have reached agreement is consistent with the objects of the Act which encourage parties to take responsibility for resolving proceedings without the need for litigation. 14 So, in summary, having regard to the factors identified in Nelson, the contents of the reports referred to above and the Applicant's submissions in support of the determination sought by the parties, I am satisfied that it is appropriate to make the proposed consent determination.

the jinibara native title holding group 15 Notwithstanding this conclusion, I consider it is appropriate to record some of the evidence adduced by the Applicant to establish that native title exists in the area the subject of the Jinibara People's claim. I do not do this to second guess the process that has been followed by the parties as outlined above, but to give some acknowledgement to the time and effort that has obviously been devoted to the preparation of the materials that have been placed before the Court in support of this application. 16 In its summary of its connection materials, the Applicant noted the observations made by Thomas Petrie and the Crown Land Commissioner Stephen Simpson, among others, in the 1830s and 1840s of the Aboriginal people in and around the claim area. In particular, Petrie and Simpson discussed the customs and ceremonies they observed relating to the Bunya tree. Petrie observed: Each blackfellow belonging to the district had two or three trees which he considered his own property, and no one else was allowed to climb these trees and gather cones…. The tribe in general owned the animals and birds on the ground, also roots and nests, but certain men and women owned different fruit or flower-trees and shrubs. 17 As land was acquired for sheep and cattle stations the local Aboriginal people were incorporated into the station workforce as stockmen and domestic workers. Station owners recorded their observations of their workers. According to Dr Skyring, Arthur McConnel, one such station owner, made detailed descriptions from the 1840s to the 1870s of "the dwellings people made, their marriage customs, their hunting and food collecting techniques, burial traditions and ceremony". 18 The materials provided by the Applicant demonstrate that notwithstanding the movement of Jinibara People off the stations to the designated Aboriginal settlements of Durundur and then Barambah (later called Cherbourg), they were able to maintain their connections to the claim area. In his report, Dr Redmond stated that: a number of families went to considerable lengths to maintain their families outside of the mission environment in small townships (including Linville, Moore, Caloundra and Harlin) around the edge of the claim area…some of the claimants who were young adult residents of Cherbourg continued to not only use the claim area for fishing, camping and hunting but also participated with the other residents in the observation of important aspects of traditional law and custom in regard to kinship and mortuary practices, and maintained the body of beliefs concerning the Rainbow Serpent and the host of elemental spirits which were seen to reside in the landscape and which thus continued to exert a powerful influence in maintaining a social focus upon normative rules governing interaction with lands and waters in the region. 19 Some of today's Jinibara claimants had direct personal relationships with forebears who were born not long after the time of first contact with Europeans. Mr Ken Murphy is the great nephew of Gaiarbau Willie McKenzie. Gaiarbau was a member of the Dungidau local group of the Jinibara who was born at Kilcoy sometime between 1873 and 1881. He was an informant to ethnographers including Dr LP Winterbotham, Ms Caroline Kelly, Mr AP Elkin and Mr Norman Tindale. Dr Redmond believes that the material provided by Gaiarbau: …remains the most detailed firsthand account that we have of the social and cultural world of south eastern Queensland aboriginal life as viewed from the perspective of a man born one generation after the first European settlement of the Jinibara claim area (1840-1) and who had the benefit of hearing his parents', grandparents, and their peers (sic) accounts of their lives at the threshold of colonisation. 20 It was partly through the ethnographic accounts of Gaiarbau's information that Dr Redmond was able to conclude that in pre-sovereignty times the Jinibara were part of a wider regional society that covered the area between the Logan River in the south, Maryborough in the north-east and the middle Condamine River in the west. This regional society, according to Dr Redmond, included several broad language-labelled aggregations of local groups including Jinibara. These groups collectively adhered to a common system of laws and customs in which there was mutual recognition by neighbouring groups of the local territory and socio-cultural identity of the Jinibara. Dr Redmond explained that: …it is the regional society's laws and customs which legitimate the claimant group's exclusive title to Jinibara country. 21 Dr Redmond identified several features of the "set of social practices, institutions and concomitant laws and customs" of the regional society including named matrimoieties; a cognate set of subsection names inherited through matrifiliation; a system of totemic matriclans; local groups recruited with a loose preference for patrifiliation; overarching language identities; a kind of initiation ceremony known as Bora/Boorool; Toaro or Wandaral, a tribal council constituted across the regional society to authorise decisions made by local groups; a cosmology in which Sky-Gods and the Rainbow Serpent were dominant figures; organised battles to resolve disputes; an organised system for participation in the harvest and consumption of the bunya nut forests and mullet runs and a regional system of land tenure based on loosely patrifilial local countries. 22 Using the information provided by Gaiarbau and recorded by early ethnographers, Dr Redmond identified the four subgroups that made up the Jinibara at the time of early contact. These were the Dungidau in the north-west; the Dal:a through the head of the Mary River in the Conondale Range and north into the Mary River Valley; the Nalbo also in the Conondale Range and at the head of the Mary River and on the Mary Plains; and the Garumngar south of what is now called Somerset Dam. Dr Redmond concluded that: …these local country groups shared, and continue to share, a body of traditional laws and customs from which their rights and interests in the lands and waters of the claim area ensue. 23 The current members of the four clans of the Jinibara People are descended from a defined set of apical ancestors. It is through their contact with their forebears that today's Jinibara were taught their laws and customs. Mr Ken Murphy lived with Gaiarbau at various times where he and Mr Noel Blair were taught about the boundaries of Jinibara country, hunting methods, food sharing practices and prohibitions based on totemic identities. 24 Contemporary Jinibara People continue to camp and fish using spears they were taught to make. They gather the resources of their lands and waters including honey, echidna, carpet snake, possum, mujuun (berries), Tillybottle, various varieties of fish including sooty grunter, mountain perch, eels, catfish and yellow belly, goanna and long-necked turtle. They follow the practices and beliefs taught by their forebears, who were themselves taught by their elders, including belief in the Rainbow Serpent and other elemental spirits dwelling in the country and mourning practices, knowledge of the landscape and the pathways through their country. Particular types of behaviour are prohibited at particular locations; other locations are sites related to species increase ceremonies. These practices, customs, beliefs and the sanctions in cases of non-adherence continue to be taught by contemporary Jinibara People to their children.

PRESCRIBED BODY CORPORATE 25 Paragraphs 10 and 11 of the proposed determination address the requirements of s 56 and 57 of the Act respectively. Section 56(1) requires the Court to determine whether the native title is to be held in trust and, if so, by whom. The Court will determine that the native title is to be held in trust where the proposed native title holders under the determination provide the Court with a nominated prescribed body corporate to be the trustee and with the written consent of that body corporate: s 56(2)(a) and (b). If no such nomination is made, the Court must determine that the native title rights and interests are to be held by the proposed native title holders under the determination: s 56(2)(c). 26 The Jinibara native title holders have not nominated a prescribed body corporate under s 56(2)(a). Accordingly, the Court must determine that the native title rights and interests are to be held by the proposed native title holders under the determination. 27 Where the s 56(2)(c) approach is followed, s 57(2) requires that the Court must take certain steps to determine which prescribed body corporate is, after becoming a registered native title body corporate, to perform the functions mentioned in s 57(3). The s 87 Agreement signed by the parties seeks a determination that the Jinibara People Aboriginal Corporation (JPAC) is to be the prescribed body corporate for the purpose of s 57(2) to perform the functions set out in s 57(3). That nomination is supported by the Applicant's supplementary submissions and the affidavit of Kenneth Paul Murphy sworn 29 October 2012. Mr Murphy deposes that JPAC was nominated by the Jinibara People to be their prescribed body corporate on 10 August 2012 and he provides evidence of the written consent of JPAC to the corporation being so nominated. 28 Accordingly, the Court determines that the JPAC be the prescribed body corporate for the purpose of s 57(2) and that it perform the functions set out in s 57(3) of the Act.

CONCLUSION 29 In concluding, it is appropriate to observe that one of the central objects of the Act is the resolution of native title claims by negotiation and agreement. The achievement of the parties in reaching this agreement as to the Jinibara People's native title claim plainly meets this central object and is, therefore, to be congratulated. 30 It is a mark of the remarkable tenacity of the Jinibara People that notwithstanding the history I mentioned earlier, they have been able to maintain the laws and customs that have always connected them to their lands. Through this determination the Australian legal system recognises that enduring connection. It is to be hoped that a new and positive chapter in the relationship between the Jinibara and the broader Australian community will succeed with this determination. However, it is important to make this departing point: that these orders do not grant native title to the claimant; they recognise the pre-existing native title that the Jinibara People have long held. I certify that the preceding thirty (30) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Reeves.