377 In this context, under the MMF Trust Deed, Slondia, as Trustee, could only exercise the power under cl 28 with the consent of the Guardian. The removal and replacement of Michael as the Appointor occurred with the Guardian's (Michael's) written consent under cl 10(3). That gave Tyrone the power, as Appointor, to remove the Trustee under cl 21. Tyrone was also made Guardian. In a broad sense, it may be accepted that Tyrone was given 'control' of the business (and other assets) of the MMF Trust. The giving of 'control' in that broad sense might subjectively have been viewed by Michael as effectively giving Tyrone an 'advance on his inheritance', in the sense that Michael might take that into account in preparing his will. It may be accepted that this was Michael's (and Yvonne's) motivation behind the execution of the MMF Variation Deed. But Slondia's purpose was (relevantly for ground 4), to change the identity of the Appointor with the Guardian's consent, to Tyrone. Tyrone was Michael's (and Yvonne's) son, he had been involved in the running of the business carried on by the trust for most of the time since he had left school in 1990, he had been the general manager of the business since 1996, he had been Slondia's managing director since 2004, and he was a person with whom Michael enjoyed a close relationship. Moreover, although Tyrone as the new Appointor had the power (by virtue of cl 21) to remove the Trustee, that power would be required to be exercised bona fide and for proper purposes for the benefit of the trust (as discussed under ground 6), whomever was Appointor. The appointment of Tyrone as new Guardian and Appointor, effected by the MMF Variation Deed with Michael's (ie, the original Guardian's) consent, was entirely unremarkable, and Slondia acted within the purposes contemplated by cl 28, having regard to the terms of the MMF Trust, read as a whole.