211 I have also concluded that Mrs Deena Ashoorian has suffered as a result of the breach of fiduciary duty due to her by the first and second defendants arising from the role which they assumed for this transaction. She too, therefore, is entitled to equitable compensation to place her in the position that she would have been had those duties not been breached. Clearly, she agreed to sell the business for $250,000 and received only $235,000. To achieve that sale she had to purchase the provider number for $80,000 and the MINFOS computer system for $20,000 as well as fit out shop 8 with the necessary equipment and fittings which, on the evidence, all cost about $96,000. But for the breach of fiduciary duties which occurred in this case, and for the misleading and deceptive conduct I am satisfied that the plaintiff would not have agreed to purchase or, if he had agreed to purchase, would not have proceeded to complete the purchase of the Waratah pharmacy. The result of this would have been that Mrs Ashoorian would have been left with the store available for lease if another buyer could be found, not necessarily at the asking price of $250,000. She would still have had to have fitted out the store, outlay the $80,000 to acquire the provider number but would not have completed the sale to Mr Anthony Fico. The result, therefore, is that Mrs Ashoorian has lost the opportunity of making a profit on the sale of the business because the sale to Mr Anthony Fico did not, in the end, prove successful. However, I do not consider that she is entitled to equitable compensation for that loss of profit because there is no certainty that the business could ever have been sold for $250,000, let alone any evidence of what additional expenses might have been necessary to make it suitable for operation as a pharmacy as, for example, for the cost of installing effective air-conditioning.