Zoe

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Zoe

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Lawyers in Sydney
Lawyers in Melbourne
Lawyers in Brisbane
Lawyers in Perth
Family lawyers
Employment lawyers
Criminal lawyers
Wills and estates lawyers
Find a lawyer

Company

Pricing
API
Privacy
Terms
Support
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Commonwealth
New South Wales
Queensland
Victoria
Western Australia
South Australia
Tasmania
Australian Capital Territory
Northern Territory

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.

Van Rassel v Kroon [1953] HCA 3 | Case summary | Zoe

Zoe

Legislation Cases Guides Find a lawyer Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Ask Zoe →

Home/Cases/[1953] HCA 3

CTHHCA

Van Rassel v Kroon

[1953] HCA 3

High Court of Australia|1953-03-04|Before: Taylor JJ, Richardson J

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

High Court of Australia

Decision date

1953-03-04

Before

Taylor JJ, Richardson J

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Judgment (1 paragraphs)

[1]

For the reasons which I have given I am of opinion that the appeal should be upheld, the decree of the Supreme Court discharged and the suit dismissed.

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

Van Rassel

Respondent/Defendant:

Kroon

Cases Cited (1)

High Court of Australia Dixon C.J. Webb and Taylor JJ. Van Rassel v Kroon [1953] HCA 3

Cited By (1)

Way v Bowling