Atkinson v Independent Commission Against Corruption

Court of Appeal (NSW)|2016-08-08|Before: Bathurst CJ, Beazley P, Basten JA, McDougall J

Solicitors: Hall & Wilcox (Appellant) Crown Solicitor for New South Wales (Respondent) File Number(s): 2014/319803 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court Jurisdiction: Common Law Division Citation: [2014] NSWSC 1018 Date of Decision: 29 July 2014 Before: McDougall J File Number(s): 2013/325031

[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]

Endnotes

Duncan v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2014] NSWSC 1018.
Independent Commission Against Corruption, Report - Investigation into the Conduct of Ian Macdonald, Edward Obeid Snr, Moses Obeid and Others (July 2013) (ICAC Report).
Duncan v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2016] NSWCA 143.
Autodesk Inc v Dyason [No 2] (1993) 176 CLR 300 at 303 (Mason CJ).
[2013] HCA 44; 87 ALJR 1159 (footnotes as in original).
(1993) 176 CLR 300 at 303 per Mason CJ, 308 per Brennan J, 314 per Deane J, 317 per Dawson J, 322 per Gaudron J.
(1993) 176 CLR 300 at 303 per Mason CJ, 308 per Brennan J, 314 per Deane J, 317 per Dawson J, 322 per Gaudron J.
See, for example, Pantorno v The Queen (1989) 166 CLR 466; [1989] HCA 18.
(1993) 176 CLR 300 at 302.
(1993) 176 CLR 300 at 303.
(1993) 176 CLR 300 at 303.
ICAC Report, p 10, col 2.
ICAC Report, p 151, col 2.
Tcpt, NSWSC, 24/06/14, p 81(26)-(40).
ICAC Report, p 156.

Amendments 08 August 2016 - [18] Amending "it" to "he" in first line. DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 08 August 2016

At a glance

Court

Decision date

Before

Source

Judgment (5 paragraphs)

Parties

Legislation Cited (4)

Cases Cited (6)