Water Plan (Pioneer Valley) 2002
sec.29Matters chief executive must consider
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.29
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Water Plan (Pioneer Valley) 2002.
sec.29 Matters chief executive must consider
In deciding the operating arrangements and supply requirements for water infrastructure, the chief executive must consider— the impact of the infrastructure’s operation on the following— water quality; instream water levels; erosion of the bed and banks of watercourses; riparian vegetation; the extent to which artificial variations in instream water levels and flows may adversely affect natural ecosystems; recreation and aesthetic values; cultural values, including, for example, cultural values of local Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander communities; and the impact of the infrastructure on the movement of fish and other aquatic species; and the impact of the transfer of water between watercourses; and the likelihood of fish deaths caused by the operation of the infrastructure. Subsection (1) does not limit the matters the chief executive may consider. s 29 amd 2014 SL No. 142 s 207 (sec.29-ssec.1) In deciding the operating arrangements and supply requirements for water infrastructure, the chief executive must consider— the impact of the infrastructure’s operation on the following— water quality; instream water levels; erosion of the bed and banks of watercourses; riparian vegetation; the extent to which artificial variations in instream water levels and flows may adversely affect natural ecosystems; recreation and aesthetic values; cultural values, including, for example, cultural values of local Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander communities; and the impact of the infrastructure on the movement of fish and other aquatic species; and the impact of the transfer of water between watercourses; and the likelihood of fish deaths caused by the operation of the infrastructure. (sec.29-ssec.2) Subsection (1) does not limit the matters the chief executive may consider.
- (a) the impact of the infrastructure’s operation on the following— (i) water quality; (ii) instream water levels; (iii) erosion of the bed and banks of watercourses; (iv) riparian vegetation; (v) the extent to which artificial variations in instream water levels and flows may adversely affect natural ecosystems; (vi) recreation and aesthetic values; (vii) cultural values, including, for example, cultural values of local Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander communities; and
- (i) water quality;
- (ii) instream water levels;
- (iii) erosion of the bed and banks of watercourses;
- (iv) riparian vegetation;
- (v) the extent to which artificial variations in instream water levels and flows may adversely affect natural ecosystems;
- (vi) recreation and aesthetic values;
- (vii) cultural values, including, for example, cultural values of local Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander communities; and
- (b) the impact of the infrastructure on the movement of fish and other aquatic species; and