The Act creates a framework for reporting and handling public interest wrongdoing in the public sector, defining who may disclose what, who may receive disclosures, and how authorities must respond. It requires public sector entities to adopt procedures, keep records and report to an oversight agency.
Disclosers get strong legal protections (immunity, confidentiality, absolute privilege) and can seek injunctive and damages remedies for reprisals, which are criminalised; employers can be vicariously liable unless they show reasonable prevention steps.
The Public Interest Disclosure Act 2010 (the Act) creates a statutory framework for making, receiving, assessing, referring, investigating and dealing with public interest disclosures about wrongdoing in the public sector. The Act defines who may disclose, what information may be disclosed, to whom disclosures may be made, and the protections and remedies available where reprisals occur.
Mechanically, the Act:
Declares its objects: to facilitate disclosures of wrongdoing, ensure disclosures are assessed and, when appropriate, investigated and dealt with, protect subjects’ interests and provide protection from reprisals (s 3).
Defines proper authorities and public sector entities (ss 5-6). A proper authority is a public sector entity or a member of the Legislative Assembly (s 5). The definition of public sector entity lists a range of State bodies, local governments, registered higher education providers, TAFE Queensland and other entities established or assisted for government purposes; it also lists specific inclusions and exclusions (s 6).
Specifies the scope of information that can be disclosed and who may disclose it. Any person may disclose limited classes of danger to people with disability, serious environmental risks tied to schedule 2 offences or conditions, and reprisals (s 12). Public officers may disclose a wider range of public sector concerns, including corrupt conduct, maladministration that substantially and specifically affects a person’s interests, substantial misuse of public resources, and substantial dangers to public health, safety or the environment (s 13).
Sets out who may receive disclosures, with special rules for disclosures about judicial officers (ss 14-16) and particular provisions for GOCs and rail government entities (s 19).
Current sections
Direct links to the current provisions in Public Interest Disclosure Act 2010.
84
ch.1-pt.1
Introduction
Introduction
sec.1
Short title
sec.1 Short title
This Act may be cited as the Public Interest Disclosure Act 2010 .
sec.2
Commencement
sec.2 Commencement
This Act commences on a day to be fixed by proclamation.
ch.1-pt.2
Main objects
Main objects
sec.3
Main objects of Act
sec.3 Main objects of Act
The main objects of this Act are—
to promote the public interest by facilitating public interest disclosures of wrongdoing in the public sector; and
to ensure that public interest disclosures are properly assessed and, when appropriate, properly investigated and dealt with; and
to ensure that appropriate consideration is given to the interests of persons who are the subject of a public interest disclosure; and
to afford protection from reprisals to persons making public interest disclosures.
(a) to promote the public interest by facilitating public interest disclosures of wrongdoing in the public sector; and
(b) to ensure that public interest disclosures are properly assessed and, when appropriate, properly investigated and dealt with; and
(c) to ensure that appropriate consideration is given to the interests of persons who are the subject of a public interest disclosure; and
(d) to afford protection from reprisals to persons making public interest disclosures.
ch.1-pt.3
Interpretation
Interpretation
sec.4
Definitions
sec.4 Definitions
The dictionary in schedule 4 defines particular words used in this Act.
sec.5
Meaning of proper authority
sec.5 Meaning of proper authority
A proper authority is—
a public sector entity; or
a member of the Legislative Assembly.
(a) a public sector entity; or
(b) a member of the Legislative Assembly.
sec.6
Meaning of public sector entity
sec.6 Meaning of public sector entity
A public sector entity is any of the following—
a committee of the Legislative Assembly, whether or not a statutory committee;
the parliamentary service;
a court or tribunal;
the administrative office attached to a court or tribunal;
the Executive Council;
a department;
The following are, or are included in, departments—
the Queensland Ambulance Service
the Queensland Fire and Rescue Service
the Queensland Police Service.
a local government;
a registered higher education provider or TAFE Queensland;
an entity established under an Act or under State or local government authorisation for a public, State or local government purpose;
an entity, prescribed under a regulation, that is assisted by public funds.
However, the following are not public sector entities—
a corporate entity, other than to the extent expressly stated in this Act;
a GOC, other than to the extent expressly stated in this Act;
the following entities under the Education (General Provisions) Act 2006 —
an advisory committee;
a non-State school;
a parents and citizens association;
an entity prescribed under a regulation.
Also, a State educational institution or school council is part of the department in which the Education (General Provisions) Act 2006 is administered.
See also the Corrective Services Act 2006 , section 273 (5) .
In this section—
registered higher education provider see the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (Cwlth) , section 5 .
TAFE Queensland means TAFE Queensland established under the TAFE Queensland Act 2013 , section 5 (1) .
s 6 amd 2013 No. 27 s 70 sch 1 pt 2 ; 2014 No. 4 s 44 sch 1 ; 2014 No. 25 s 223 sch 1 pt 2 ; 2014 No. 62 s 140 sch 1 ; 2020 No. 3 s 136 sch 1
(sec.6-ssec.1) A public sector entity is any of the following— a committee of the Legislative Assembly, whether or not a statutory committee; the parliamentary service; a court or tribunal; the administrative office attached to a court or tribunal; the Executive Council; a department; The following are, or are included in, departments— the Queensland Ambulance Service the Queensland Fire and Rescue Service the Queensland Police Service. a local government; a registered higher education provider or TAFE Queensland; an entity established under an Act or under State or local government authorisation for a public, State or local government purpose; an entity, prescribed under a regulation, that is assisted by public funds.
(sec.6-ssec.2) However, the following are not public sector entities— a corporate entity, other than to the extent expressly stated in this Act; a GOC, other than to the extent expressly stated in this Act; the following entities under the Education (General Provisions) Act 2006 — an advisory committee; a non-State school; a parents and citizens association; an entity prescribed under a regulation.
(sec.6-ssec.3) Also, a State educational institution or school council is part of the department in which the Education (General Provisions) Act 2006 is administered. See also the Corrective Services Act 2006 , section 273 (5) .
(sec.6-ssec.4) In this section— registered higher education provider see the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (Cwlth) , section 5 . TAFE Queensland means TAFE Queensland established under the TAFE Queensland Act 2013 , section 5 (1) .
(a) a committee of the Legislative Assembly, whether or not a statutory committee;
(b) the parliamentary service;
(c) a court or tribunal;
(d) the administrative office attached to a court or tribunal;
(e) the Executive Council;
(f) a department; Note— The following are, or are included in, departments— • the Queensland Ambulance Service • the Queensland Fire and Rescue Service • the Queensland Police Service.
• the Queensland Ambulance Service
• the Queensland Fire and Rescue Service
• the Queensland Police Service.
(g) a local government;
(h) a registered higher education provider or TAFE Queensland;
(j) an entity established under an Act or under State or local government authorisation for a public, State or local government purpose;
(k) an entity, prescribed under a regulation, that is assisted by public funds.
• the Queensland Ambulance Service
• the Queensland Fire and Rescue Service
• the Queensland Police Service.
(a) a corporate entity, other than to the extent expressly stated in this Act;
(b) a GOC, other than to the extent expressly stated in this Act;
(c) the following entities under the Education (General Provisions) Act 2006 — (i) an advisory committee; (ii) a non-State school; (iii) a parents and citizens association;
(i) an advisory committee;
(ii) a non-State school;
(iii) a parents and citizens association;
(d) an entity prescribed under a regulation.
(i) an advisory committee;
(ii) a non-State school;
(iii) a parents and citizens association;
sec.7
Meaning of public officer
sec.7 Meaning of public officer
A public officer , of a public sector entity, is an employee, member or officer of the entity.
Also—
the Minister responsible for the administration of a department is a public officer of the department; and
a member of a school council is a public officer of the department in which the Education (General Provisions) Act 2006 is administered; and
a Ministerial staff member employed in the office of a Minister is a public officer of each department administered by the Minister; and
a Ministerial staff member employed in the office of an Assistant Minister is a public officer of each department for which the Assistant Minister is given responsibility under her or his functions.
Under the Constitution of Queensland 2001 , section 25 , an Assistant Minister has the functions decided by the Premier.
In this section—
Assistant Minister means a member of the Legislative Assembly appointed as an Assistant Minister under the Constitution of Queensland 2001 , section 24 .
ministerial staff member means a person employed under the Ministerial and Other Office Holder Staff Act 2010 as a staff member in the office of a Minister.
s 7 amd 2012 No. 6 s 27 sch amdts 1(1)(d), (2), 2(1)(e), (2)
(sec.7-ssec.1) A public officer , of a public sector entity, is an employee, member or officer of the entity.
(sec.7-ssec.2) Also— the Minister responsible for the administration of a department is a public officer of the department; and a member of a school council is a public officer of the department in which the Education (General Provisions) Act 2006 is administered; and a Ministerial staff member employed in the office of a Minister is a public officer of each department administered by the Minister; and a Ministerial staff member employed in the office of an Assistant Minister is a public officer of each department for which the Assistant Minister is given responsibility under her or his functions. Under the Constitution of Queensland 2001 , section 25 , an Assistant Minister has the functions decided by the Premier.
(sec.7-ssec.3) In this section— Assistant Minister means a member of the Legislative Assembly appointed as an Assistant Minister under the Constitution of Queensland 2001 , section 24 . ministerial staff member means a person employed under the Ministerial and Other Office Holder Staff Act 2010 as a staff member in the office of a Minister.
(a) the Minister responsible for the administration of a department is a public officer of the department; and
(b) a member of a school council is a public officer of the department in which the Education (General Provisions) Act 2006 is administered; and
(c) a Ministerial staff member employed in the office of a Minister is a public officer of each department administered by the Minister; and
(d) a Ministerial staff member employed in the office of an Assistant Minister is a public officer of each department for which the Assistant Minister is given responsibility under her or his functions. Note— Under the Constitution of Queensland 2001 , section 25 , an Assistant Minister has the functions decided by the Premier.
sec.8
Meaning of chief executive officer
sec.8 Meaning of chief executive officer
The chief executive officer of a public sector entity includes, if the entity is listed in schedule 1 , a person mentioned in the schedule as chief executive officer of the entity.
A regulation may prescribe a person who is to be treated as a chief executive officer of a particular public sector entity for all or particular public interest disclosures.
A regulation under subsection (2) may not prescribe a chief executive officer for a public sector entity mentioned in schedule 1 , other than a part of a department.
(sec.8-ssec.1) The chief executive officer of a public sector entity includes, if the entity is listed in schedule 1 , a person mentioned in the schedule as chief executive officer of the entity.
(sec.8-ssec.2) A regulation may prescribe a person who is to be treated as a chief executive officer of a particular public sector entity for all or particular public interest disclosures.
(sec.8-ssec.3) A regulation under subsection (2) may not prescribe a chief executive officer for a public sector entity mentioned in schedule 1 , other than a part of a department.
ch.1-pt.4
Operation of Act
Operation of Act
sec.9
Act binds all persons
sec.9 Act binds all persons
This Act binds all persons, including the State.
sec.10
Other protection saved
sec.10 Other protection saved
This Act does not limit the protection given by another law to a person who makes a disclosure of any type or affect another remedy available to the person.
If there is an inconsistency between this Act and another law mentioned in subsection (1) , the other law prevails to the extent of the inconsistency.
(sec.10-ssec.1) This Act does not limit the protection given by another law to a person who makes a disclosure of any type or affect another remedy available to the person.
(sec.10-ssec.2) If there is an inconsistency between this Act and another law mentioned in subsection (1) , the other law prevails to the extent of the inconsistency.
ch.2-pt.1
Interpretation
Interpretation
sec.11
Meaning of public interest disclosure
sec.11 Meaning of public interest disclosure
A public interest disclosure is a disclosure under this chapter and includes all information and help given by the discloser to a proper authority for the disclosure.
This chapter sets out requirements about the information that may be disclosed and who may disclose it, to whom, and how.
ch.2-pt.2
General public interest disclosures
General public interest disclosures
ch.2-pt.2-div.1
Information that may be disclosed and who may disclose it
Information that may be disclosed and who may disclose it
sec.12
Disclosure by any person
sec.12 Disclosure by any person
This section applies if a person (whether or not the person is a public officer) has information about—
a substantial and specific danger to the health or safety of a person with a disability; or
the commission of an offence against a provision mentioned in schedule 2 , if the commission of the offence is or would be a substantial and specific danger to the environment; or
a contravention of a condition imposed under a provision mentioned in schedule 2 , if the contravention is or would be a substantial and specific danger to the environment; or
the conduct of another person that could, if proved, be a reprisal.
The person may make a disclosure under section 17 in relation to the information to a proper authority.
For subsection (1) , a person has information about the conduct of another person or another matter if—
the person honestly believes on reasonable grounds that the information tends to show the conduct or other matter; or
the information tends to show the conduct or other matter, regardless of whether the person honestly believes the information tends to show the conduct or other matter.
(sec.12-ssec.1) This section applies if a person (whether or not the person is a public officer) has information about— a substantial and specific danger to the health or safety of a person with a disability; or the commission of an offence against a provision mentioned in schedule 2 , if the commission of the offence is or would be a substantial and specific danger to the environment; or a contravention of a condition imposed under a provision mentioned in schedule 2 , if the contravention is or would be a substantial and specific danger to the environment; or the conduct of another person that could, if proved, be a reprisal.
(sec.12-ssec.2) The person may make a disclosure under section 17 in relation to the information to a proper authority.
(sec.12-ssec.3) For subsection (1) , a person has information about the conduct of another person or another matter if— the person honestly believes on reasonable grounds that the information tends to show the conduct or other matter; or the information tends to show the conduct or other matter, regardless of whether the person honestly believes the information tends to show the conduct or other matter.
(a) a substantial and specific danger to the health or safety of a person with a disability; or
(b) the commission of an offence against a provision mentioned in schedule 2 , if the commission of the offence is or would be a substantial and specific danger to the environment; or
(c) a contravention of a condition imposed under a provision mentioned in schedule 2 , if the contravention is or would be a substantial and specific danger to the environment; or
(d) the conduct of another person that could, if proved, be a reprisal.
(a) the person honestly believes on reasonable grounds that the information tends to show the conduct or other matter; or
(b) the information tends to show the conduct or other matter, regardless of whether the person honestly believes the information tends to show the conduct or other matter.
sec.13
Disclosure by a public officer
sec.13 Disclosure by a public officer
This section applies if a person who is a public officer has information about—
the conduct of another person that could, if proved, be—
corrupt conduct; or
maladministration that adversely affects a person’s interests in a substantial and specific way; or
a substantial misuse of public resources (other than an alleged misuse based on mere disagreement over policy that may properly be adopted about amounts, purposes or priorities of expenditure); or
a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety; or
a substantial and specific danger to the environment.
The person may make a disclosure under section 17 in relation to the information to a proper authority.
For subsection (1) , a person has information about the conduct of another person or another matter if—
the person honestly believes on reasonable grounds that the information tends to show the conduct or other matter; or
the information tends to show the conduct or other matter, regardless of whether the person honestly believes the information tends to show the conduct or other matter.
If the other person is a commission officer, subsection (1) (a) (i) applies as though the Crime and Corruption Commission were a unit of public administration.
In this section—
commission officer see the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 , schedule 2 , definition commission officer , paragraph (a) .
unit of public administration see the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 , section 20 .
s 13 amd 2014 No. 21 s 94 (2) sch 2 ; 2024 No. 41 s 50
(sec.13-ssec.1) This section applies if a person who is a public officer has information about— the conduct of another person that could, if proved, be— corrupt conduct; or maladministration that adversely affects a person’s interests in a substantial and specific way; or a substantial misuse of public resources (other than an alleged misuse based on mere disagreement over policy that may properly be adopted about amounts, purposes or priorities of expenditure); or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety; or a substantial and specific danger to the environment.
(sec.13-ssec.2) The person may make a disclosure under section 17 in relation to the information to a proper authority.
(sec.13-ssec.3) For subsection (1) , a person has information about the conduct of another person or another matter if— the person honestly believes on reasonable grounds that the information tends to show the conduct or other matter; or the information tends to show the conduct or other matter, regardless of whether the person honestly believes the information tends to show the conduct or other matter.
(sec.13-ssec.4) If the other person is a commission officer, subsection (1) (a) (i) applies as though the Crime and Corruption Commission were a unit of public administration.
(sec.13-ssec.5) In this section— commission officer see the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 , schedule 2 , definition commission officer , paragraph (a) . unit of public administration see the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 , section 20 .
(a) the conduct of another person that could, if proved, be— (i) corrupt conduct; or (ii) maladministration that adversely affects a person’s interests in a substantial and specific way; or
(i) corrupt conduct; or
(ii) maladministration that adversely affects a person’s interests in a substantial and specific way; or
(b) a substantial misuse of public resources (other than an alleged misuse based on mere disagreement over policy that may properly be adopted about amounts, purposes or priorities of expenditure); or
(c) a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety; or
(d) a substantial and specific danger to the environment.
(i) corrupt conduct; or
(ii) maladministration that adversely affects a person’s interests in a substantial and specific way; or
(a) the person honestly believes on reasonable grounds that the information tends to show the conduct or other matter; or
(b) the information tends to show the conduct or other matter, regardless of whether the person honestly believes the information tends to show the conduct or other matter.
ch.2-pt.2-div.2
To whom disclosure may be made
To whom disclosure may be made
sec.14
When member of the Legislative Assembly is a proper authority
sec.14 When member of the Legislative Assembly is a proper authority
A member of the Legislative Assembly is a proper authority to whom a person may make any disclosure under section 12 or 13 .
However, subsection (1) does not apply to a disclosure if the information that is the subject of the disclosure relates to a judicial officer.
(sec.14-ssec.1) A member of the Legislative Assembly is a proper authority to whom a person may make any disclosure under section 12 or 13 .
(sec.14-ssec.2) However, subsection (1) does not apply to a disclosure if the information that is the subject of the disclosure relates to a judicial officer.
sec.15
Public sector entity is a proper authority if particular connection
sec.15 Public sector entity is a proper authority if particular connection
A public sector entity is a proper authority to which a person may make a disclosure under section 12 or 13 if—
the information that is the subject of the disclosure relates to—
the conduct of the entity or any of its public officers; or
anything the entity has a power to investigate or remedy; or
the conduct of another person that could, if proved, be a reprisal that relates to a previous disclosure made by the person to a proper authority; or
the person honestly believes that the information that is the subject of the disclosure relates to a matter mentioned in paragraph (a) .
However, subsection (1) does not apply to a disclosure if the information that is the subject of the disclosure relates to a judicial officer.
(sec.15-ssec.1) A public sector entity is a proper authority to which a person may make a disclosure under section 12 or 13 if— the information that is the subject of the disclosure relates to— the conduct of the entity or any of its public officers; or anything the entity has a power to investigate or remedy; or the conduct of another person that could, if proved, be a reprisal that relates to a previous disclosure made by the person to a proper authority; or the person honestly believes that the information that is the subject of the disclosure relates to a matter mentioned in paragraph (a) .
(sec.15-ssec.2) However, subsection (1) does not apply to a disclosure if the information that is the subject of the disclosure relates to a judicial officer.
(a) the information that is the subject of the disclosure relates to— (i) the conduct of the entity or any of its public officers; or (ii) anything the entity has a power to investigate or remedy; or (iii) the conduct of another person that could, if proved, be a reprisal that relates to a previous disclosure made by the person to a proper authority; or
(i) the conduct of the entity or any of its public officers; or
(ii) anything the entity has a power to investigate or remedy; or
(iii) the conduct of another person that could, if proved, be a reprisal that relates to a previous disclosure made by the person to a proper authority; or
(b) the person honestly believes that the information that is the subject of the disclosure relates to a matter mentioned in paragraph (a) .
(i) the conduct of the entity or any of its public officers; or
(ii) anything the entity has a power to investigate or remedy; or
(iii) the conduct of another person that could, if proved, be a reprisal that relates to a previous disclosure made by the person to a proper authority; or
sec.16
Chief judicial officer etc. is only proper authority
sec.16 Chief judicial officer etc. is only proper authority
This section applies to a disclosure relating to a judicial officer, other than a disclosure made under section 23 .
A disclosure relating to a judicial officer that could, if the conduct were proved, be corrupt conduct or a reprisal relating to a previous disclosure under this Act, may be made only—
to the chief judicial officer of the relevant court or tribunal; or
to the Crime and Corruption Commission.
Another disclosure relating to a judicial officer may be made only to the chief judicial officer of the relevant court or tribunal.
A chief judicial officer of a court or tribunal may receive a public interest disclosure only if the disclosure is about the conduct of another judicial officer of the court or tribunal.
The chief judicial officer may refer a public interest disclosure made to the chief judicial officer about the conduct of another judicial officer to a proper authority that is a public sector entity.
Section 31 (2) to (5) applies to a referral under subsection (5) as if the chief judicial officer were a public sector entity.
In this section—
disclosure relating to a judicial officer means a disclosure where the information that is the subject of the disclosure relates to the conduct of the judicial officer.
relevant court or tribunal , for a judicial officer, is the court or tribunal of which the judicial officer is a member or to which the judicial officer is attached.
s 16 amd 2014 No. 21 s 94 (2) sch 2
(sec.16-ssec.1) This section applies to a disclosure relating to a judicial officer, other than a disclosure made under section 23 .
(sec.16-ssec.2) A disclosure relating to a judicial officer that could, if the conduct were proved, be corrupt conduct or a reprisal relating to a previous disclosure under this Act, may be made only— to the chief judicial officer of the relevant court or tribunal; or to the Crime and Corruption Commission.
(sec.16-ssec.3) Another disclosure relating to a judicial officer may be made only to the chief judicial officer of the relevant court or tribunal.
(sec.16-ssec.4) A chief judicial officer of a court or tribunal may receive a public interest disclosure only if the disclosure is about the conduct of another judicial officer of the court or tribunal.
(sec.16-ssec.5) The chief judicial officer may refer a public interest disclosure made to the chief judicial officer about the conduct of another judicial officer to a proper authority that is a public sector entity.
(sec.16-ssec.6) Section 31 (2) to (5) applies to a referral under subsection (5) as if the chief judicial officer were a public sector entity.
(sec.16-ssec.7) In this section— disclosure relating to a judicial officer means a disclosure where the information that is the subject of the disclosure relates to the conduct of the judicial officer. relevant court or tribunal , for a judicial officer, is the court or tribunal of which the judicial officer is a member or to which the judicial officer is attached.
(a) to the chief judicial officer of the relevant court or tribunal; or
(b) to the Crime and Corruption Commission.
ch.2-pt.2-div.3
How disclosure may be made
How disclosure may be made
sec.17
How disclosure to be made
sec.17 How disclosure to be made
A person may make a disclosure to a proper authority in any way, including anonymously.
However, if a proper authority has a reasonable procedure for making a public interest disclosure to the proper authority, the person must use the procedure.
Despite subsection (2) , if the proper authority is a public sector entity, the person may make the disclosure to—
its chief executive officer; or
for a public sector entity that is a department—the Minister responsible for its administration; or
if the proper authority that is a public sector entity has a governing body—a member of its governing body; or
if the person is an officer of the entity—another person who, directly or indirectly, supervises or manages the person; or
an officer of the entity who has the function of receiving or taking action on the type of information being disclosed.
an officer of an entity’s ethical standards unit, if the disclosure is made under section 13 (1) (a) (i)
a health officer or environmental officer of a department having a statutory or administrative responsibility to investigate something mentioned in section 12 (1) (a) , (b) or (c) or section 13 (1) (c) or (d)
the officer of an entity in charge of its human resource management if the public interest disclosure is made under section 12 (1) (d) and is about detriment to the career of an employee of the entity
This Act does not affect a procedure required under another Act for disclosing the type of information being disclosed.
If a public interest disclosure is properly made to a proper authority, the proper authority is taken to have received the disclosure for the purposes of this Act.
(sec.17-ssec.1) A person may make a disclosure to a proper authority in any way, including anonymously.
(sec.17-ssec.2) However, if a proper authority has a reasonable procedure for making a public interest disclosure to the proper authority, the person must use the procedure.
(sec.17-ssec.3) Despite subsection (2) , if the proper authority is a public sector entity, the person may make the disclosure to— its chief executive officer; or for a public sector entity that is a department—the Minister responsible for its administration; or if the proper authority that is a public sector entity has a governing body—a member of its governing body; or if the person is an officer of the entity—another person who, directly or indirectly, supervises or manages the person; or an officer of the entity who has the function of receiving or taking action on the type of information being disclosed. an officer of an entity’s ethical standards unit, if the disclosure is made under section 13 (1) (a) (i) a health officer or environmental officer of a department having a statutory or administrative responsibility to investigate something mentioned in section 12 (1) (a) , (b) or (c) or section 13 (1) (c) or (d) the officer of an entity in charge of its human resource management if the public interest disclosure is made under section 12 (1) (d) and is about detriment to the career of an employee of the entity
(sec.17-ssec.4) This Act does not affect a procedure required under another Act for disclosing the type of information being disclosed.
(sec.17-ssec.5) If a public interest disclosure is properly made to a proper authority, the proper authority is taken to have received the disclosure for the purposes of this Act.
(a) its chief executive officer; or
(b) for a public sector entity that is a department—the Minister responsible for its administration; or
(c) if the proper authority that is a public sector entity has a governing body—a member of its governing body; or
(d) if the person is an officer of the entity—another person who, directly or indirectly, supervises or manages the person; or
(e) an officer of the entity who has the function of receiving or taking action on the type of information being disclosed. Examples of officers for paragraph (e) — 1 an officer of an entity’s ethical standards unit, if the disclosure is made under section 13 (1) (a) (i) 2 a health officer or environmental officer of a department having a statutory or administrative responsibility to investigate something mentioned in section 12 (1) (a) , (b) or (c) or section 13 (1) (c) or (d) 3 the officer of an entity in charge of its human resource management if the public interest disclosure is made under section 12 (1) (d) and is about detriment to the career of an employee of the entity
1 an officer of an entity’s ethical standards unit, if the disclosure is made under section 13 (1) (a) (i)
2 a health officer or environmental officer of a department having a statutory or administrative responsibility to investigate something mentioned in section 12 (1) (a) , (b) or (c) or section 13 (1) (c) or (d)
3 the officer of an entity in charge of its human resource management if the public interest disclosure is made under section 12 (1) (d) and is about detriment to the career of an employee of the entity
1 an officer of an entity’s ethical standards unit, if the disclosure is made under section 13 (1) (a) (i)
2 a health officer or environmental officer of a department having a statutory or administrative responsibility to investigate something mentioned in section 12 (1) (a) , (b) or (c) or section 13 (1) (c) or (d)
3 the officer of an entity in charge of its human resource management if the public interest disclosure is made under section 12 (1) (d) and is about detriment to the career of an employee of the entity
sec.18
Disclosure concerning corporate entity
sec.18 Disclosure concerning corporate entity
s 18 om 2012 No. 33 s 192 sch
amd 2014 No. 21 s 94 (2) sch 2 (amdts could not be given effect)
ch.2-pt.3
Specific public interest disclosures—corporate entities and GOCs
Specific public interest disclosures—corporate entities and GOCs
sec.19
Disclosure concerning GOC or rail government entity
sec.19 Disclosure concerning GOC or rail government entity
This section applies if an employee of a GOC or rail government entity has information about—
the conduct of another employee of the GOC or rail government entity, that could, if proved, be corrupt conduct; or
the conduct of another person that could, if proved, be a reprisal that relates to a previous disclosure made by the employee to the GOC, rail government entity or the Crime and Corruption Commission.
The employee may make a disclosure in relation to the information to the GOC, rail government entity or the Crime and Corruption Commission.
For subsection (1) , an employee has information about the conduct of a person if—
the employee honestly believes on reasonable grounds that the information tends to show the conduct; or
the information tends to show the conduct, regardless of whether the employee honestly believes the information tends to show the conduct.
The employee may make a disclosure under this section in any way, including anonymously.
However, for a disclosure to a GOC or rail government entity, if the GOC or rail government entity has a reasonable procedure for making a public interest disclosure to the GOC or rail government entity, the employee must use the procedure.
This Act does not affect a procedure required under another Act for disclosing the type of information being disclosed.
If a public interest disclosure is properly made to a GOC or rail government entity, the GOC or rail government entity is taken to have received the disclosure for the purposes of this Act.
This section does not affect—
the making of a public interest disclosure by any person under section 12 ; or
the making of a complaint to the Crime and Corruption Commission under the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 .
This section does not affect a referral under section 31 —
from a GOC or rail government entity to a public sector entity of a public interest disclosure made to the GOC or rail government entity under this section; or
from a public sector entity to a GOC or rail government entity of a public interest disclosure made to the public sector entity under section 15 .
This section is declared to be a Corporations legislation displacement provision for the purposes of the Corporations Act , section 5G , in relation to section 1317AE of that Act.
The Corporations Act , section 5G , provides that if a State law declares a provision of a State law to be a Corporations legislation displacement provision, any provision of the Corporations legislation with which the State provision would otherwise be inconsistent does not apply to the extent necessary to avoid the inconsistency.
s 19 amd 2013 No. 19 s 120 sch 1 ; 2014 No. 21 s 94 (2) sch 2 ; 2019 No. 9 s 97
(sec.19-ssec.1) This section applies if an employee of a GOC or rail government entity has information about— the conduct of another employee of the GOC or rail government entity, that could, if proved, be corrupt conduct; or the conduct of another person that could, if proved, be a reprisal that relates to a previous disclosure made by the employee to the GOC, rail government entity or the Crime and Corruption Commission.
(sec.19-ssec.2) The employee may make a disclosure in relation to the information to the GOC, rail government entity or the Crime and Corruption Commission.
(sec.19-ssec.3) For subsection (1) , an employee has information about the conduct of a person if— the employee honestly believes on reasonable grounds that the information tends to show the conduct; or the information tends to show the conduct, regardless of whether the employee honestly believes the information tends to show the conduct.
(sec.19-ssec.4) The employee may make a disclosure under this section in any way, including anonymously.
(sec.19-ssec.5) However, for a disclosure to a GOC or rail government entity, if the GOC or rail government entity has a reasonable procedure for making a public interest disclosure to the GOC or rail government entity, the employee must use the procedure.
(sec.19-ssec.6) This Act does not affect a procedure required under another Act for disclosing the type of information being disclosed.
(sec.19-ssec.7) If a public interest disclosure is properly made to a GOC or rail government entity, the GOC or rail government entity is taken to have received the disclosure for the purposes of this Act.
(sec.19-ssec.8) This section does not affect— the making of a public interest disclosure by any person under section 12 ; or the making of a complaint to the Crime and Corruption Commission under the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 .
(sec.19-ssec.9) This section does not affect a referral under section 31 — from a GOC or rail government entity to a public sector entity of a public interest disclosure made to the GOC or rail government entity under this section; or from a public sector entity to a GOC or rail government entity of a public interest disclosure made to the public sector entity under section 15 .
(sec.19-ssec.10) This section is declared to be a Corporations legislation displacement provision for the purposes of the Corporations Act , section 5G , in relation to section 1317AE of that Act. The Corporations Act , section 5G , provides that if a State law declares a provision of a State law to be a Corporations legislation displacement provision, any provision of the Corporations legislation with which the State provision would otherwise be inconsistent does not apply to the extent necessary to avoid the inconsistency.
(a) the conduct of another employee of the GOC or rail government entity, that could, if proved, be corrupt conduct; or
(b) the conduct of another person that could, if proved, be a reprisal that relates to a previous disclosure made by the employee to the GOC, rail government entity or the Crime and Corruption Commission.
(a) the employee honestly believes on reasonable grounds that the information tends to show the conduct; or
(b) the information tends to show the conduct, regardless of whether the employee honestly believes the information tends to show the conduct.
(a) the making of a public interest disclosure by any person under section 12 ; or
(b) the making of a complaint to the Crime and Corruption Commission under the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 .
(a) from a GOC or rail government entity to a public sector entity of a public interest disclosure made to the GOC or rail government entity under this section; or
(b) from a public sector entity to a GOC or rail government entity of a public interest disclosure made to the public sector entity under section 15 .
ch.2-pt.4
Public interest disclosures to journalists
Public interest disclosures to journalists
sec.20
When disclosure may be made to a journalist
sec.20 When disclosure may be made to a journalist
This section applies if—
a person has made a public interest disclosure under this chapter; and
the entity to which the disclosure was made or, if the disclosure was referred under section 31 or 34 , the entity to which the disclosure was referred—
decided not to investigate or deal with the disclosure; or
investigated the disclosure but did not recommend the taking of any action in relation to the disclosure; or
did not notify the person, within 6 months after the date the disclosure was made, whether or not the disclosure was to be investigated or dealt with.
The person may make a disclosure of substantially the same information that was the subject of the public interest disclosure mentioned in subsection (1) (a) to a journalist.
To remove any doubt, it is declared that—
the disclosure of information to a journalist under this section is a public interest disclosure; and
a journalist to whom information is disclosed under this section is not a relevant person for the purposes of section 64 ; and
a journalist to whom information is disclosed under this section does not, for the purposes of section 65 , gain the information because of the journalist’s involvement in this Act’s administration.
In this section—
journalist means a person engaged in the occupation of writing or editing material intended for publication in the print or electronic news media.
(sec.20-ssec.1) This section applies if— a person has made a public interest disclosure under this chapter; and the entity to which the disclosure was made or, if the disclosure was referred under section 31 or 34 , the entity to which the disclosure was referred— decided not to investigate or deal with the disclosure; or investigated the disclosure but did not recommend the taking of any action in relation to the disclosure; or did not notify the person, within 6 months after the date the disclosure was made, whether or not the disclosure was to be investigated or dealt with.
(sec.20-ssec.2) The person may make a disclosure of substantially the same information that was the subject of the public interest disclosure mentioned in subsection (1) (a) to a journalist.
(sec.20-ssec.3) To remove any doubt, it is declared that— the disclosure of information to a journalist under this section is a public interest disclosure; and a journalist to whom information is disclosed under this section is not a relevant person for the purposes of section 64 ; and a journalist to whom information is disclosed under this section does not, for the purposes of section 65 , gain the information because of the journalist’s involvement in this Act’s administration.
(sec.20-ssec.4) In this section— journalist means a person engaged in the occupation of writing or editing material intended for publication in the print or electronic news media.
(a) a person has made a public interest disclosure under this chapter; and
(b) the entity to which the disclosure was made or, if the disclosure was referred under section 31 or 34 , the entity to which the disclosure was referred— (i) decided not to investigate or deal with the disclosure; or (ii) investigated the disclosure but did not recommend the taking of any action in relation to the disclosure; or (iii) did not notify the person, within 6 months after the date the disclosure was made, whether or not the disclosure was to be investigated or dealt with.
(i) decided not to investigate or deal with the disclosure; or
(ii) investigated the disclosure but did not recommend the taking of any action in relation to the disclosure; or
(iii) did not notify the person, within 6 months after the date the disclosure was made, whether or not the disclosure was to be investigated or dealt with.
(i) decided not to investigate or deal with the disclosure; or
(ii) investigated the disclosure but did not recommend the taking of any action in relation to the disclosure; or
(iii) did not notify the person, within 6 months after the date the disclosure was made, whether or not the disclosure was to be investigated or dealt with.
(a) the disclosure of information to a journalist under this section is a public interest disclosure; and
(b) a journalist to whom information is disclosed under this section is not a relevant person for the purposes of section 64 ; and
(c) a journalist to whom information is disclosed under this section does not, for the purposes of section 65 , gain the information because of the journalist’s involvement in this Act’s administration.
ch.2-pt.5
Miscellaneous provisions
Miscellaneous provisions
sec.21
Conduct of unknown person
sec.21 Conduct of unknown person
A person may make a public interest disclosure whether or not the person is able to identify a particular person to whom the information disclosed relates.
sec.22
Involuntary disclosure
sec.22 Involuntary disclosure
A person may make a public interest disclosure even though the person makes it under a legal requirement.
sec.23
Disclosure in court or tribunal proceeding
sec.23 Disclosure in court or tribunal proceeding
The section applies if a person—
has information that the person may disclose as a public interest disclosure to a proper authority; and
discloses the information to a court or tribunal in a proceeding in which the information is relevant and admissible.
The disclosure is taken to be a public interest disclosure made to the court or tribunal as a proper authority under section 15 (1) (a) (ii) .
The court or tribunal may refer the disclosure to another proper authority.
Section 31 (2) to (5) applies to a referral under subsection (3) as if the court or tribunal were a public sector entity.
The fact that a court or tribunal is treated as a public sector entity under this Act, and therefore can be a proper authority under section 15 (1) (a) (ii) to receive a public interest disclosure, does not give a person a right to take a proceeding before the court or tribunal that the person does not have apart from this Act.
(sec.23-ssec.1) The section applies if a person— has information that the person may disclose as a public interest disclosure to a proper authority; and discloses the information to a court or tribunal in a proceeding in which the information is relevant and admissible.
(sec.23-ssec.2) The disclosure is taken to be a public interest disclosure made to the court or tribunal as a proper authority under section 15 (1) (a) (ii) .
(sec.23-ssec.3) The court or tribunal may refer the disclosure to another proper authority.
(sec.23-ssec.4) Section 31 (2) to (5) applies to a referral under subsection (3) as if the court or tribunal were a public sector entity.
(sec.23-ssec.5) The fact that a court or tribunal is treated as a public sector entity under this Act, and therefore can be a proper authority under section 15 (1) (a) (ii) to receive a public interest disclosure, does not give a person a right to take a proceeding before the court or tribunal that the person does not have apart from this Act.
(a) has information that the person may disclose as a public interest disclosure to a proper authority; and
(b) discloses the information to a court or tribunal in a proceeding in which the information is relevant and admissible.
sec.24
Past, present or future event
sec.24 Past, present or future event
A person may make a public interest disclosure about—
events that happened or may have happened, whether before or after the commencement of this Act; or
events that are or may be happening; or
events that will or may happen.
(a) events that happened or may have happened, whether before or after the commencement of this Act; or
(b) events that are or may be happening; or
(c) events that will or may happen.
sec.25
Number of disclosures not limited
sec.25 Number of disclosures not limited
The fact that a person may make a public interest disclosure under a particular provision of this Act does not prevent the person from making the disclosure under another provision of this Act to the same or another proper authority.
ch.3-pt.1
Preliminary
Preliminary
sec.26
Definition for ch 3
sec.26 Definition for ch 3
In this chapter—
public sector entity includes a GOC.
s 26 def public sector entity amd 2013 No. 19 s 120 sch 1
sub 2012 No. 33 s 192 sch
sec.27
Purpose of chapter
sec.27 Purpose of chapter
The purpose of this chapter is to state the obligations of—
a public sector entity to which a public interest disclosure may be made; and
a member of the Legislative Assembly to whom a public interest disclosure may be made.
(a) a public sector entity to which a public interest disclosure may be made; and
(b) a member of the Legislative Assembly to whom a public interest disclosure may be made.
ch.3-pt.2
Public sector entities
Public sector entities
sec.28
Reasonable procedures to deal with public interest disclosures
sec.28 Reasonable procedures to deal with public interest disclosures
The chief executive officer of a public sector entity must establish reasonable procedures to ensure that—
public officers of the entity who make public interest disclosures are given appropriate support; and
public interest disclosures made to the entity are properly assessed and, when appropriate, properly investigated and dealt with; and
appropriate action is taken in relation to any wrongdoing that is the subject of a public interest disclosure made to the entity; and
a management program for public interest disclosures made to the entity, consistent with any standard made under section 60 , is developed and implemented; and
public officers of the entity are offered protection from reprisals by the entity or other public officers of the entity.
The chief executive officer of a public sector entity must ensure the procedures are published, as soon as practicable after the procedures are made, on a website that is maintained by the public sector entity and readily accessible to the public.
(sec.28-ssec.1) The chief executive officer of a public sector entity must establish reasonable procedures to ensure that— public officers of the entity who make public interest disclosures are given appropriate support; and public interest disclosures made to the entity are properly assessed and, when appropriate, properly investigated and dealt with; and appropriate action is taken in relation to any wrongdoing that is the subject of a public interest disclosure made to the entity; and a management program for public interest disclosures made to the entity, consistent with any standard made under section 60 , is developed and implemented; and public officers of the entity are offered protection from reprisals by the entity or other public officers of the entity.
(sec.28-ssec.2) The chief executive officer of a public sector entity must ensure the procedures are published, as soon as practicable after the procedures are made, on a website that is maintained by the public sector entity and readily accessible to the public.
(a) public officers of the entity who make public interest disclosures are given appropriate support; and
(b) public interest disclosures made to the entity are properly assessed and, when appropriate, properly investigated and dealt with; and
(c) appropriate action is taken in relation to any wrongdoing that is the subject of a public interest disclosure made to the entity; and
(d) a management program for public interest disclosures made to the entity, consistent with any standard made under section 60 , is developed and implemented; and
(e) public officers of the entity are offered protection from reprisals by the entity or other public officers of the entity.
sec.29
Record of disclosure
sec.29 Record of disclosure
The chief executive officer of a public sector entity to which a public interest disclosure is made must keep a proper record of the disclosure, including—
the name of the person making the disclosure, if known; and
the information disclosed; and
any action taken on the disclosure; and
any other information required under a standard made under section 60 .
The chief executive officer of a public sector entity to which a public interest disclosure is referred under section 31 or 34 must keep a proper record of the disclosure, including—
the name of the person making the disclosure, if known; and
the information disclosed; and
the name of the public sector entity, or member of the Legislative Assembly, that referred the disclosure; and
any action taken on the disclosure; and
any other information required under a standard made under section 60 .
In this section—
public interest disclosure includes a purported public interest disclosure.
public sector entity does not include—
a court or tribunal; or
the Executive Council.
(sec.29-ssec.1) The chief executive officer of a public sector entity to which a public interest disclosure is made must keep a proper record of the disclosure, including— the name of the person making the disclosure, if known; and the information disclosed; and any action taken on the disclosure; and any other information required under a standard made under section 60 .
(sec.29-ssec.2) The chief executive officer of a public sector entity to which a public interest disclosure is referred under section 31 or 34 must keep a proper record of the disclosure, including— the name of the person making the disclosure, if known; and the information disclosed; and the name of the public sector entity, or member of the Legislative Assembly, that referred the disclosure; and any action taken on the disclosure; and any other information required under a standard made under section 60 .
(sec.29-ssec.3) In this section— public interest disclosure includes a purported public interest disclosure. public sector entity does not include— a court or tribunal; or the Executive Council.
(a) the name of the person making the disclosure, if known; and
(b) the information disclosed; and
(c) any action taken on the disclosure; and
(d) any other information required under a standard made under section 60 .
(a) the name of the person making the disclosure, if known; and
(b) the information disclosed; and
(c) the name of the public sector entity, or member of the Legislative Assembly, that referred the disclosure; and
(d) any action taken on the disclosure; and
(e) any other information required under a standard made under section 60 .
(a) a court or tribunal; or
(b) the Executive Council.
sec.30
When no action required
sec.30 When no action required
A public sector entity may decide not to investigate or deal with a public interest disclosure if—
the substance of the disclosure has already been investigated or dealt with by another appropriate process; or
the entity reasonably considers that the disclosure should be dealt with by another appropriate process; or
the age of the information the subject of the disclosure makes it impracticable to investigate; or
the entity reasonably considers that the disclosure is too trivial to warrant investigation and that dealing with the disclosure would substantially and unreasonably divert the resources of the entity from their use by the entity in the performance of its functions; or
another entity that has jurisdiction to investigate the disclosure has notified the entity that investigation of the disclosure is not warranted.
If an entity decides not to investigate or deal with a public interest disclosure under subsection (1) , the entity must give written reasons for its decision to the person making the disclosure.
A person who receives written reasons for a decision of an entity under subsection (2) may apply to the chief executive of the entity for a review of the decision within 28 days after receiving the written reasons.
(sec.30-ssec.1) A public sector entity may decide not to investigate or deal with a public interest disclosure if— the substance of the disclosure has already been investigated or dealt with by another appropriate process; or the entity reasonably considers that the disclosure should be dealt with by another appropriate process; or the age of the information the subject of the disclosure makes it impracticable to investigate; or the entity reasonably considers that the disclosure is too trivial to warrant investigation and that dealing with the disclosure would substantially and unreasonably divert the resources of the entity from their use by the entity in the performance of its functions; or another entity that has jurisdiction to investigate the disclosure has notified the entity that investigation of the disclosure is not warranted.
(sec.30-ssec.2) If an entity decides not to investigate or deal with a public interest disclosure under subsection (1) , the entity must give written reasons for its decision to the person making the disclosure.
(sec.30-ssec.3) A person who receives written reasons for a decision of an entity under subsection (2) may apply to the chief executive of the entity for a review of the decision within 28 days after receiving the written reasons.
(a) the substance of the disclosure has already been investigated or dealt with by another appropriate process; or
(b) the entity reasonably considers that the disclosure should be dealt with by another appropriate process; or
(c) the age of the information the subject of the disclosure makes it impracticable to investigate; or
(d) the entity reasonably considers that the disclosure is too trivial to warrant investigation and that dealing with the disclosure would substantially and unreasonably divert the resources of the entity from their use by the entity in the performance of its functions; or
(e) another entity that has jurisdiction to investigate the disclosure has notified the entity that investigation of the disclosure is not warranted.
sec.31
Referral of disclosure
sec.31 Referral of disclosure
A public sector entity to which a public interest disclosure is made under section 15 , or referred under section 34 , may refer the disclosure to another public sector entity (the referral entity ) if the disclosure is about—
the conduct of the referral entity or a public officer of the referral entity; or
the conduct of an entity (including itself), or another matter, that the referral entity has the power to investigate or remedy.
The power of a public sector entity to investigate or remedy conduct that is the subject of a public interest disclosure is not limited by a referral of the disclosure under subsection (1) .
The public sector entity must not refer a public interest disclosure to another public sector entity if it considers there is an unacceptable risk that a reprisal would happen because of the referral.
In considering whether there would be an unacceptable risk, the public sector entity must, if practicable, consult with the person who made the public interest disclosure.
This section does not affect another law under which a public sector entity must refer a report, complaint, information or evidence to another entity.
(sec.31-ssec.1) A public sector entity to which a public interest disclosure is made under section 15 , or referred under section 34 , may refer the disclosure to another public sector entity (the referral entity ) if the disclosure is about— the conduct of the referral entity or a public officer of the referral entity; or the conduct of an entity (including itself), or another matter, that the referral entity has the power to investigate or remedy.
(sec.31-ssec.2) The power of a public sector entity to investigate or remedy conduct that is the subject of a public interest disclosure is not limited by a referral of the disclosure under subsection (1) .
(sec.31-ssec.3) The public sector entity must not refer a public interest disclosure to another public sector entity if it considers there is an unacceptable risk that a reprisal would happen because of the referral.
(sec.31-ssec.4) In considering whether there would be an unacceptable risk, the public sector entity must, if practicable, consult with the person who made the public interest disclosure.
(sec.31-ssec.5) This section does not affect another law under which a public sector entity must refer a report, complaint, information or evidence to another entity.
(a) the conduct of the referral entity or a public officer of the referral entity; or
(b) the conduct of an entity (including itself), or another matter, that the referral entity has the power to investigate or remedy.
sec.32
Person who made disclosure, or referring entity, to be informed
sec.32 Person who made disclosure, or referring entity, to be informed
A public sector entity to which a public interest disclosure is made under section 15 , or referred under section 31 or 34 , must give the person who made the disclosure, or the entity that referred the disclosure, reasonable information about the disclosure.
For subsection (1) , reasonable information about the disclosure includes at least the following—
confirmation that the disclosure was received by the public sector entity;
a description of the action proposed to be taken, or taken, by the public sector entity in relation to the disclosure;
if action has been taken by the public sector entity in relation to the disclosure—a description of the results of the action.
The information must be given to the person or the entity in writing.
The public sector entity need not give information under subsection (1) if giving the information would be likely to adversely affect—
anybody’s safety; or
the investigation of an offence or possible offence; or
necessary confidentiality about an informant’s existence or identity.
If a person makes a public interest disclosure to the Crime and Corruption Commission in a complaint of corruption, this section does not impose on the commission any duty that the commission does not already have under the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 .
In this section—
corruption see the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 , schedule 2 .
s 32 amd 2014 No. 21 s 94 (2) sch 2
(sec.32-ssec.1) A public sector entity to which a public interest disclosure is made under section 15 , or referred under section 31 or 34 , must give the person who made the disclosure, or the entity that referred the disclosure, reasonable information about the disclosure.
(sec.32-ssec.2) For subsection (1) , reasonable information about the disclosure includes at least the following— confirmation that the disclosure was received by the public sector entity; a description of the action proposed to be taken, or taken, by the public sector entity in relation to the disclosure; if action has been taken by the public sector entity in relation to the disclosure—a description of the results of the action.
(sec.32-ssec.3) The information must be given to the person or the entity in writing.
(sec.32-ssec.4) The public sector entity need not give information under subsection (1) if giving the information would be likely to adversely affect— anybody’s safety; or the investigation of an offence or possible offence; or necessary confidentiality about an informant’s existence or identity.
(sec.32-ssec.5) If a person makes a public interest disclosure to the Crime and Corruption Commission in a complaint of corruption, this section does not impose on the commission any duty that the commission does not already have under the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 .
(sec.32-ssec.6) In this section— corruption see the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 , schedule 2 .
(a) confirmation that the disclosure was received by the public sector entity;
(b) a description of the action proposed to be taken, or taken, by the public sector entity in relation to the disclosure;
(c) if action has been taken by the public sector entity in relation to the disclosure—a description of the results of the action.
(a) anybody’s safety; or
(b) the investigation of an offence or possible offence; or
(c) necessary confidentiality about an informant’s existence or identity.
sec.33
Disclosure information to be given to oversight agency
sec.33 Disclosure information to be given to oversight agency
The oversight agency may make, under section 60 , a standard that requires the chief executive officer of a public sector entity to give to the oversight agency all or any of the information mentioned in section 29 .
The standard may provide for the way in which and the period within which the information is to be given.
(sec.33-ssec.1) The oversight agency may make, under section 60 , a standard that requires the chief executive officer of a public sector entity to give to the oversight agency all or any of the information mentioned in section 29 .
(sec.33-ssec.2) The standard may provide for the way in which and the period within which the information is to be given.
ch.3-pt.3
Members of Legislative Assembly
Members of Legislative Assembly
sec.34
Referral of disclosure
sec.34 Referral of disclosure
A member of the Legislative Assembly to whom a public interest disclosure is made under section 14 may refer the disclosure to another public sector entity (the referral entity ) if the member considers the referral entity has power to investigate or remedy the conduct or other matter that is the subject of the disclosure.
For the purposes of this Act, the member has no role in investigating the disclosure.
In this section—
public interest disclosure includes a purported public interest disclosure.
(sec.34-ssec.1) A member of the Legislative Assembly to whom a public interest disclosure is made under section 14 may refer the disclosure to another public sector entity (the referral entity ) if the member considers the referral entity has power to investigate or remedy the conduct or other matter that is the subject of the disclosure.
(sec.34-ssec.2) For the purposes of this Act, the member has no role in investigating the disclosure.
(sec.34-ssec.3) In this section— public interest disclosure includes a purported public interest disclosure.
sec.35
Legislative Assembly may still deal with disclosure
sec.35 Legislative Assembly may still deal with disclosure
This Act does not limit the immunities, powers, privileges or rights of the Legislative Assembly or its members or committees in relation to a public interest disclosure made to a member of the Legislative Assembly.
In this section—
committee means a committee of the Legislative Assembly, whether or not a statutory committee.
public interest disclosure includes a purported public interest disclosure.
(sec.35-ssec.1) This Act does not limit the immunities, powers, privileges or rights of the Legislative Assembly or its members or committees in relation to a public interest disclosure made to a member of the Legislative Assembly.
(sec.35-ssec.2) In this section— committee means a committee of the Legislative Assembly, whether or not a statutory committee. public interest disclosure includes a purported public interest disclosure.
ch.4-pt.1
General
General
sec.36
Immunity from liability
sec.36 Immunity from liability
A person who makes a public interest disclosure is not subject to any civil or criminal liability or any liability arising by way of administrative process, including disciplinary action, for making the disclosure.
sec.37
Confidentiality provisions do not apply
sec.37 Confidentiality provisions do not apply
Without limiting section 36 , a person who makes a public interest disclosure does not by doing so—
commit an offence under any Act that imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality in relation to a matter or any other restriction on the disclosure of information; or
breach an obligation by way of oath or rule of law or practice or under an agreement requiring the person to maintain confidentiality or otherwise restricting the disclosure of information in relation to a matter.
(a) commit an offence under any Act that imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality in relation to a matter or any other restriction on the disclosure of information; or
(b) breach an obligation by way of oath or rule of law or practice or under an agreement requiring the person to maintain confidentiality or otherwise restricting the disclosure of information in relation to a matter.
sec.38
Protection from defamation action
sec.38 Protection from defamation action
Without limiting section 36 , in a proceeding for defamation, a person who makes a public interest disclosure has a defence of absolute privilege for publishing the information disclosed.
sec.39
Liability for own conduct
sec.39 Liability for own conduct
A person’s liability for the person’s own conduct is not affected by the person’s disclosure of that conduct under this Act.
In this section—
liability includes civil or criminal liability or any liability arising by way of administrative process, including disciplinary action.
(sec.39-ssec.1) A person’s liability for the person’s own conduct is not affected by the person’s disclosure of that conduct under this Act.
(sec.39-ssec.2) In this section— liability includes civil or criminal liability or any liability arising by way of administrative process, including disciplinary action.
sec.40
Reprisal and grounds for reprisal
sec.40 Reprisal and grounds for reprisal
A person must not cause, or attempt or conspire to cause, detriment to another person because, or in the belief that—
the other person or someone else has made, or intends to make, a public interest disclosure; or
the other person or someone else is, has been, or intends to be, involved in a proceeding under the Act against any person.
An attempt to cause detriment includes an attempt to induce a person to cause detriment.
A contravention of subsection (1) is a reprisal or the taking of a reprisal.
A ground mentioned in subsection (1) as the ground for a reprisal is the unlawful ground for the reprisal.
For the contravention mentioned in subsection (3) to happen, it is sufficient if the unlawful ground is a substantial ground for the act or omission that is the reprisal, even if there is another ground for the act or omission.
(sec.40-ssec.1) A person must not cause, or attempt or conspire to cause, detriment to another person because, or in the belief that— the other person or someone else has made, or intends to make, a public interest disclosure; or the other person or someone else is, has been, or intends to be, involved in a proceeding under the Act against any person.
(sec.40-ssec.2) An attempt to cause detriment includes an attempt to induce a person to cause detriment.
(sec.40-ssec.3) A contravention of subsection (1) is a reprisal or the taking of a reprisal.
(sec.40-ssec.4) A ground mentioned in subsection (1) as the ground for a reprisal is the unlawful ground for the reprisal.
(sec.40-ssec.5) For the contravention mentioned in subsection (3) to happen, it is sufficient if the unlawful ground is a substantial ground for the act or omission that is the reprisal, even if there is another ground for the act or omission.
(a) the other person or someone else has made, or intends to make, a public interest disclosure; or
(b) the other person or someone else is, has been, or intends to be, involved in a proceeding under the Act against any person.
sec.41
Offence of taking reprisal
sec.41 Offence of taking reprisal
A person must not take a reprisal.
Maximum penalty—167 penalty units or 2 years imprisonment.
An offence against subsection (1) is an indictable offence.
(sec.41-ssec.1) A person must not take a reprisal. Maximum penalty—167 penalty units or 2 years imprisonment.
(sec.41-ssec.2) An offence against subsection (1) is an indictable offence.
sec.42
Damages entitlement for reprisal
sec.42 Damages entitlement for reprisal
A reprisal is a tort and a person who takes a reprisal is liable in damages to any person who suffers detriment as a result.
Any appropriate remedy that may be granted by a court for a tort, including exemplary damages, may be granted by a court for the taking of a reprisal.
If the claim for damages goes to trial in the Supreme Court or the District Court, it must be decided by a judge sitting without a jury.
The right of a person to bring proceedings for damages under this section does not affect any other right or remedy available to the person arising from the reprisal.
Proceedings for damages may be brought under this section even if a prosecution in relation to the reprisal has not been brought, or can not be brought, under section 41 .
The Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 does not apply to proceedings for damages brought under this section.
(sec.42-ssec.1) A reprisal is a tort and a person who takes a reprisal is liable in damages to any person who suffers detriment as a result.
(sec.42-ssec.2) Any appropriate remedy that may be granted by a court for a tort, including exemplary damages, may be granted by a court for the taking of a reprisal.
(sec.42-ssec.3) If the claim for damages goes to trial in the Supreme Court or the District Court, it must be decided by a judge sitting without a jury.
(sec.42-ssec.4) The right of a person to bring proceedings for damages under this section does not affect any other right or remedy available to the person arising from the reprisal.
(sec.42-ssec.5) Proceedings for damages may be brought under this section even if a prosecution in relation to the reprisal has not been brought, or can not be brought, under section 41 .
(sec.42-ssec.6) The Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 does not apply to proceedings for damages brought under this section.
sec.43
Vicarious liability of public sector entity
sec.43 Vicarious liability of public sector entity
If any of a public sector entity’s employees contravenes section 40 in the course of employment, both the public sector entity and the employee, as the case may be, are jointly and severally civilly liable for the contravention, and a proceeding under section 42 may be taken against either or both.
It is a defence to a proceeding against a public sector entity under section 42 if the public sector entity proves, on the balance of probabilities, that the public sector entity took reasonable steps to prevent the employee contravening section 40 .
In this section—
public sector entity includes a GOC.
s 43 amd 2013 No. 19 s 120 sch 1 ; 2012 No. 33 s 192 sch
(sec.43-ssec.1) If any of a public sector entity’s employees contravenes section 40 in the course of employment, both the public sector entity and the employee, as the case may be, are jointly and severally civilly liable for the contravention, and a proceeding under section 42 may be taken against either or both.
(sec.43-ssec.2) It is a defence to a proceeding against a public sector entity under section 42 if the public sector entity proves, on the balance of probabilities, that the public sector entity took reasonable steps to prevent the employee contravening section 40 .
(sec.43-ssec.3) In this section— public sector entity includes a GOC.
sec.44
Complaint under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991
sec.44 Complaint under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991
A person may make a complaint under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 about a reprisal.
The complaint may be dealt with under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 , chapters 6 and 7 as if the complaint were about an alleged contravention of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 .
However—
if a person commences proceedings in a court under section 42 in relation to a reprisal, the person can not subsequently make a complaint under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 about the reprisal; and
if the person makes a complaint under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 about a reprisal and the complaint is accepted under that Act, the person can not subsequently commence proceedings under section 42 in relation to the reprisal.
A complaint under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 about a reprisal may be made even if a prosecution in relation to the reprisal has not been brought, or can not be brought, under section 41 .
(sec.44-ssec.1) A person may make a complaint under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 about a reprisal.
(sec.44-ssec.2) The complaint may be dealt with under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 , chapters 6 and 7 as if the complaint were about an alleged contravention of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 .
(sec.44-ssec.3) However— if a person commences proceedings in a court under section 42 in relation to a reprisal, the person can not subsequently make a complaint under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 about the reprisal; and if the person makes a complaint under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 about a reprisal and the complaint is accepted under that Act, the person can not subsequently commence proceedings under section 42 in relation to the reprisal.
(sec.44-ssec.4) A complaint under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 about a reprisal may be made even if a prosecution in relation to the reprisal has not been brought, or can not be brought, under section 41 .
(a) if a person commences proceedings in a court under section 42 in relation to a reprisal, the person can not subsequently make a complaint under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 about the reprisal; and
(b) if the person makes a complaint under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 about a reprisal and the complaint is accepted under that Act, the person can not subsequently commence proceedings under section 42 in relation to the reprisal.
sec.45
Reasonable management action not prevented
sec.45 Reasonable management action not prevented
Nothing in this part is intended to prevent a manager from taking reasonable management action in relation to an employee who has made a public interest disclosure.
However, a manager may take reasonable management action in relation to an employee who has made a public interest disclosure only if the manager’s reasons for taking the action do not include the fact that the person has made the public interest disclosure.
In this section—
manager , of an employee, means a person to whom the employee reports or a person who directly or indirectly supervises the employee in the performance of the employee’s functions as an employee.
reasonable management action , taken by a manager in relation to an employee, includes any of the following taken by the manager—
a reasonable appraisal of the employee’s work performance;
a reasonable requirement that the employee undertake counselling;
a reasonable suspension of the employee from the employment workplace;
a reasonable disciplinary action;
a reasonable action to transfer or deploy the employee;
a reasonable action to end the employee’s employment by way of redundancy or retrenchment;
a reasonable action in relation to an action mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (f) ;
a reasonable action in relation to the employee’s failure to obtain a promotion, reclassification, transfer or benefit, or to retain a benefit, in relation to the employee’s employment.
(sec.45-ssec.1) Nothing in this part is intended to prevent a manager from taking reasonable management action in relation to an employee who has made a public interest disclosure.
(sec.45-ssec.2) However, a manager may take reasonable management action in relation to an employee who has made a public interest disclosure only if the manager’s reasons for taking the action do not include the fact that the person has made the public interest disclosure.
(sec.45-ssec.3) In this section— manager , of an employee, means a person to whom the employee reports or a person who directly or indirectly supervises the employee in the performance of the employee’s functions as an employee. reasonable management action , taken by a manager in relation to an employee, includes any of the following taken by the manager— a reasonable appraisal of the employee’s work performance; a reasonable requirement that the employee undertake counselling; a reasonable suspension of the employee from the employment workplace; a reasonable disciplinary action; a reasonable action to transfer or deploy the employee; a reasonable action to end the employee’s employment by way of redundancy or retrenchment; a reasonable action in relation to an action mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (f) ; a reasonable action in relation to the employee’s failure to obtain a promotion, reclassification, transfer or benefit, or to retain a benefit, in relation to the employee’s employment.
(a) a reasonable appraisal of the employee’s work performance;
(b) a reasonable requirement that the employee undertake counselling;
(c) a reasonable suspension of the employee from the employment workplace;
(d) a reasonable disciplinary action;
(e) a reasonable action to transfer or deploy the employee;
(f) a reasonable action to end the employee’s employment by way of redundancy or retrenchment;
(g) a reasonable action in relation to an action mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (f) ;
(h) a reasonable action in relation to the employee’s failure to obtain a promotion, reclassification, transfer or benefit, or to retain a benefit, in relation to the employee’s employment.
ch.4-pt.2
Administrative actions
Administrative actions
sec.46
Right of appeal or review of public officer
sec.46 Right of appeal or review of public officer
This section applies to a public officer who, under an Act, may appeal against, or apply for a review of, any of the following actions—
disciplinary action taken against the public officer;
the appointment or transfer of the public officer or another public officer to a position as a public officer;
unfair treatment of the public officer.
Whether or not the Act specifies grounds for the appeal or review, the public officer may also appeal the action or apply to have the action set aside because it was the taking of a reprisal against the public officer.
Subsection (2) applies even if the decision on the hearing of the appeal or review is in the form of a recommendation.
In this section—
public officer includes an employee of a GOC.
s 46 amd 2013 No. 19 s 120 sch 1 ; 2012 No. 33 s 192 sch
(sec.46-ssec.1) This section applies to a public officer who, under an Act, may appeal against, or apply for a review of, any of the following actions— disciplinary action taken against the public officer; the appointment or transfer of the public officer or another public officer to a position as a public officer; unfair treatment of the public officer.
(sec.46-ssec.2) Whether or not the Act specifies grounds for the appeal or review, the public officer may also appeal the action or apply to have the action set aside because it was the taking of a reprisal against the public officer.
(sec.46-ssec.3) Subsection (2) applies even if the decision on the hearing of the appeal or review is in the form of a recommendation.
(sec.46-ssec.4) In this section— public officer includes an employee of a GOC.
(a) disciplinary action taken against the public officer;
(b) the appointment or transfer of the public officer or another public officer to a position as a public officer;
(c) unfair treatment of the public officer.
sec.47
Relocation of public service employee
sec.47 Relocation of public service employee
This section gives a public service employee a right to apply for relocation.
The application must be made on the ground that—
it is likely a reprisal will be taken against the public service employee if the employee continues in the employee’s existing work location; and
the only practical way to remove or substantially remove the danger of a reprisal is to relocate the employee.
The application may be made by the public service employee to the industrial relations commission under the Industrial Relations Act 2016 .
For the purposes of subsection (3) —
the application is taken to be an appeal against a decision under the Public Sector Act 2022 not to relocate the employee; and
the decision mentioned in paragraph (a) is taken to have been made by the chief executive of the employee’s department on the day the employee makes the application under subsection (1) .
If the industrial relations commission considers the ground is established, the commission may direct that the employee be relocated within the employee’s department or to another department.
The industrial relations commission can not direct that the employee be relocated without the agreement of—
the public service employee; and
if the relocation is to another department—the other department’s chief executive.
For subsection (5) , the industrial relations commission has power to do, or authorise the doing of, anything necessary or convenient to relocate the public service employee.
s 47 amd 2012 No. 22 s 13 ; 2020 No. 35 s 16 ; 2022 No. 34 s 365 sch 3
(sec.47-ssec.1) This section gives a public service employee a right to apply for relocation.
(sec.47-ssec.2) The application must be made on the ground that— it is likely a reprisal will be taken against the public service employee if the employee continues in the employee’s existing work location; and the only practical way to remove or substantially remove the danger of a reprisal is to relocate the employee.
(sec.47-ssec.3) The application may be made by the public service employee to the industrial relations commission under the Industrial Relations Act 2016 .
(sec.47-ssec.4) For the purposes of subsection (3) — the application is taken to be an appeal against a decision under the Public Sector Act 2022 not to relocate the employee; and the decision mentioned in paragraph (a) is taken to have been made by the chief executive of the employee’s department on the day the employee makes the application under subsection (1) .
(sec.47-ssec.5) If the industrial relations commission considers the ground is established, the commission may direct that the employee be relocated within the employee’s department or to another department.
(sec.47-ssec.6) The industrial relations commission can not direct that the employee be relocated without the agreement of— the public service employee; and if the relocation is to another department—the other department’s chief executive.
(sec.47-ssec.7) For subsection (5) , the industrial relations commission has power to do, or authorise the doing of, anything necessary or convenient to relocate the public service employee.
(a) it is likely a reprisal will be taken against the public service employee if the employee continues in the employee’s existing work location; and
(b) the only practical way to remove or substantially remove the danger of a reprisal is to relocate the employee.
(a) the application is taken to be an appeal against a decision under the Public Sector Act 2022 not to relocate the employee; and
(b) the decision mentioned in paragraph (a) is taken to have been made by the chief executive of the employee’s department on the day the employee makes the application under subsection (1) .
(a) the public service employee; and
(b) if the relocation is to another department—the other department’s chief executive.
ch.4-pt.3
Injunctions
Injunctions
sec.48
Right to apply to industrial commission
sec.48 Right to apply to industrial commission
An application for an injunction about a reprisal may be made to the industrial commission if the reprisal—
has caused or may cause detriment to an employee; and
involves or may involve a breach of the Industrial Relations Act 2016 or an industrial instrument under that Act.
The application may be made by—
the employee; or
an industrial organisation—
whose rules entitle it to represent the industrial interests of the employee; and
acting in the employee’s interests with the employee’s consent; or
the Crime and Corruption Commission acting in the employee’s interests with the employee’s consent if—
the employee is a public officer; and
the reprisal involves or may involve an act or omission that the Crime and Corruption Commission may investigate.
The Industrial Relations Act 2016 , section 473 applies to the application, but this part prevails if it is inconsistent with that section.
If the industrial commission has jurisdiction to grant an injunction on an application under subsection (1) , the jurisdiction is exclusive of the jurisdiction of any other court or tribunal other than the Industrial Court.
Without limiting this section, the application is an industrial cause within the meaning of the Industrial Relations Act 2016 .
s 48 amd 2014 No. 21 s 94 (2) sch 2 ; 2016 No. 63 s 1157 sch 6
(sec.48-ssec.1) An application for an injunction about a reprisal may be made to the industrial commission if the reprisal— has caused or may cause detriment to an employee; and involves or may involve a breach of the Industrial Relations Act 2016 or an industrial instrument under that Act.
(sec.48-ssec.2) The application may be made by— the employee; or an industrial organisation— whose rules entitle it to represent the industrial interests of the employee; and acting in the employee’s interests with the employee’s consent; or the Crime and Corruption Commission acting in the employee’s interests with the employee’s consent if— the employee is a public officer; and the reprisal involves or may involve an act or omission that the Crime and Corruption Commission may investigate.
(sec.48-ssec.3) The Industrial Relations Act 2016 , section 473 applies to the application, but this part prevails if it is inconsistent with that section.
(sec.48-ssec.4) If the industrial commission has jurisdiction to grant an injunction on an application under subsection (1) , the jurisdiction is exclusive of the jurisdiction of any other court or tribunal other than the Industrial Court.
(sec.48-ssec.5) Without limiting this section, the application is an industrial cause within the meaning of the Industrial Relations Act 2016 .
(a) has caused or may cause detriment to an employee; and
(b) involves or may involve a breach of the Industrial Relations Act 2016 or an industrial instrument under that Act.
(a) the employee; or
(b) an industrial organisation— (i) whose rules entitle it to represent the industrial interests of the employee; and (ii) acting in the employee’s interests with the employee’s consent; or
(i) whose rules entitle it to represent the industrial interests of the employee; and
(ii) acting in the employee’s interests with the employee’s consent; or
(c) the Crime and Corruption Commission acting in the employee’s interests with the employee’s consent if— (i) the employee is a public officer; and (ii) the reprisal involves or may involve an act or omission that the Crime and Corruption Commission may investigate.
(i) the employee is a public officer; and
(ii) the reprisal involves or may involve an act or omission that the Crime and Corruption Commission may investigate.
(i) whose rules entitle it to represent the industrial interests of the employee; and
(ii) acting in the employee’s interests with the employee’s consent; or
(i) the employee is a public officer; and
(ii) the reprisal involves or may involve an act or omission that the Crime and Corruption Commission may investigate.
sec.49
Right to apply to Supreme Court
sec.49 Right to apply to Supreme Court
This section applies only to a person who can not apply under section 48 to the industrial commission for an injunction about a reprisal.
An application for an injunction about a reprisal may be made to the Supreme Court by—
a person claiming that the person is suffering or may suffer detriment from a reprisal; or
the Crime and Corruption Commission acting in the person’s interests with the person’s consent if—
the person is a public officer; and
the reprisal involves or may involve an act or omission that the Crime and Corruption Commission may investigate.
s 49 amd 2014 No. 21 s 94 (2) sch 2
(sec.49-ssec.1) This section applies only to a person who can not apply under section 48 to the industrial commission for an injunction about a reprisal.
(sec.49-ssec.2) An application for an injunction about a reprisal may be made to the Supreme Court by— a person claiming that the person is suffering or may suffer detriment from a reprisal; or the Crime and Corruption Commission acting in the person’s interests with the person’s consent if— the person is a public officer; and the reprisal involves or may involve an act or omission that the Crime and Corruption Commission may investigate.
(a) a person claiming that the person is suffering or may suffer detriment from a reprisal; or
(b) the Crime and Corruption Commission acting in the person’s interests with the person’s consent if— (i) the person is a public officer; and (ii) the reprisal involves or may involve an act or omission that the Crime and Corruption Commission may investigate.
(i) the person is a public officer; and
(ii) the reprisal involves or may involve an act or omission that the Crime and Corruption Commission may investigate.
(i) the person is a public officer; and
(ii) the reprisal involves or may involve an act or omission that the Crime and Corruption Commission may investigate.
sec.50
No right to apply for injunction if complaint made under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991
sec.50 No right to apply for injunction if complaint made under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991
Despite sections 48 and 49 , a person may not apply for an injunction about a reprisal under either of those provisions if the person makes a complaint under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 about the reprisal.
See the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 , section 144 (Applications for orders protecting complainant’s interests (before reference to tribunal)).
sec.51
Grounds for injunction
sec.51 Grounds for injunction
The industrial commission or Supreme Court may grant an injunction under this part, in terms it considers appropriate, if it is satisfied that a person has engaged, is engaging or is proposing to engage, in conduct amounting to—
a reprisal; or
attempting a reprisal; or
aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring a reprisal; or
inducing or attempting to induce, whether by threats, promises or otherwise, a reprisal; or
being in any way, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in, or party to, a reprisal.
(a) a reprisal; or
(b) attempting a reprisal; or
(c) aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring a reprisal; or
(d) inducing or attempting to induce, whether by threats, promises or otherwise, a reprisal; or
(e) being in any way, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in, or party to, a reprisal.
sec.52
Order may require stated action
sec.52 Order may require stated action
If the industrial commission or Supreme Court is satisfied that a person has engaged or is engaging in conduct mentioned in section 51 , it may grant an injunction, under this part, requiring the person to take stated action to remedy any detriment caused by the conduct.
sec.53
Evidence
sec.53 Evidence
The industrial commission or Supreme Court may grant an injunction, under this part, restraining a person from engaging in conduct mentioned in section 51 —
whether or not it considers that the person intends to engage again, or to continue to engage, in the conduct; or
whether or not the person has previously engaged in the conduct; or
whether or not there is an imminent danger of substantial damage to anyone if the person engages in the conduct.
The industrial commission or Supreme Court may grant an injunction, under this part, requiring a person to do something—
whether or not it considers that the person intends to fail again, or to continue to fail, to do the thing; or
whether or not the person has previously failed to do the thing; or
whether or not there is an imminent danger of substantial damage to anybody if the person fails to do the thing.
(sec.53-ssec.1) The industrial commission or Supreme Court may grant an injunction, under this part, restraining a person from engaging in conduct mentioned in section 51 — whether or not it considers that the person intends to engage again, or to continue to engage, in the conduct; or whether or not the person has previously engaged in the conduct; or whether or not there is an imminent danger of substantial damage to anyone if the person engages in the conduct.
(sec.53-ssec.2) The industrial commission or Supreme Court may grant an injunction, under this part, requiring a person to do something— whether or not it considers that the person intends to fail again, or to continue to fail, to do the thing; or whether or not the person has previously failed to do the thing; or whether or not there is an imminent danger of substantial damage to anybody if the person fails to do the thing.
(a) whether or not it considers that the person intends to engage again, or to continue to engage, in the conduct; or
(b) whether or not the person has previously engaged in the conduct; or
(c) whether or not there is an imminent danger of substantial damage to anyone if the person engages in the conduct.
(a) whether or not it considers that the person intends to fail again, or to continue to fail, to do the thing; or
(b) whether or not the person has previously failed to do the thing; or
(c) whether or not there is an imminent danger of substantial damage to anybody if the person fails to do the thing.
sec.54
Interim injunction
sec.54 Interim injunction
An interim injunction may be granted pending the final decision on an application for an injunction under this part.
sec.55
Restrictions about application
sec.55 Restrictions about application
For an application for an injunction under this part that is before it, the industrial commission or Supreme Court may direct that—
a report of the whole or part of the proceeding for the application must not be published; or
evidence given, or anything filed, tendered or exhibited in the application must be withheld from release or search, or released or searched only on a stated condition.
The direction may be given if the industrial commission or Supreme Court considers that—
disclosure of the report, evidence or thing would not be in the public interest; or
persons other than parties to the application do not have a sufficient legitimate interest in being informed of the report, evidence or thing.
An application for an injunction under this part may be heard without notice to another person if the industrial commission or Supreme Court considers a hearing without notice to another person is necessary in the circumstances.
This section does not limit the power of the industrial commission or Supreme Court.
(sec.55-ssec.1) For an application for an injunction under this part that is before it, the industrial commission or Supreme Court may direct that— a report of the whole or part of the proceeding for the application must not be published; or evidence given, or anything filed, tendered or exhibited in the application must be withheld from release or search, or released or searched only on a stated condition.
(sec.55-ssec.2) The direction may be given if the industrial commission or Supreme Court considers that— disclosure of the report, evidence or thing would not be in the public interest; or persons other than parties to the application do not have a sufficient legitimate interest in being informed of the report, evidence or thing.
(sec.55-ssec.3) An application for an injunction under this part may be heard without notice to another person if the industrial commission or Supreme Court considers a hearing without notice to another person is necessary in the circumstances.
(sec.55-ssec.4) This section does not limit the power of the industrial commission or Supreme Court.
(a) a report of the whole or part of the proceeding for the application must not be published; or
(b) evidence given, or anything filed, tendered or exhibited in the application must be withheld from release or search, or released or searched only on a stated condition.
(a) disclosure of the report, evidence or thing would not be in the public interest; or
(b) persons other than parties to the application do not have a sufficient legitimate interest in being informed of the report, evidence or thing.
sec.56
Undertaking as to damages and costs
sec.56 Undertaking as to damages and costs
If the Crime and Corruption Commission applies for an injunction under this part, no undertaking about damages or costs is to be required.
s 56 amd 2014 No. 21 s 94 (2) sch 2
ch.8-pt.1
Transitional provisions for Act No. 38 of 2010
Transitional provisions for Act No. 38 of 2010
sec.73
Definitions for part
sec.73 Definitions for part
In this part—
commencement means the commencement of this section.
new Act means the Public Interest Disclosure Act 2010 .
repealed Act means the Whistleblowers Protection Act 1994 .
s 73 amd 2024 No. 41 s 52
sec.74
Disclosures made under repealed Act
sec.74 Disclosures made under repealed Act
A public interest disclosure made under the repealed Act before the commencement of this section is taken, from the commencement, to be a public interest disclosure under the new Act.
sec.75
Vicarious liability of employers
sec.75 Vicarious liability of employers
Proceedings under section 42 of the new Act may be taken against an employer of a person who causes detriment to another person in reprisal for a public interest disclosure only if the reprisal happens after the commencement.
sec.76
Complaint under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991
sec.76 Complaint under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991
A complaint may be made under section 44(1) in relation to a reprisal only if the reprisal happens after the commencement.
sec.77
Confidentiality of information
sec.77 Confidentiality of information
This section applies if a person gained confidential information because of the person’s involvement as a public officer in the administration of the repealed Act.
The person is taken to have gained the information because of the person’s involvement as a public officer in the new Act’s administration.
The person may make a record of the confidential information, or disclose it to someone else, under section 65(3) of the new Act, even if the person gained the information before the commencement.
In this section—
public officer includes a former member of the former misconduct tribunal established under the repealed Misconduct Tribunals Act 1997 , section 11 .
(sec.77-ssec.1) This section applies if a person gained confidential information because of the person’s involvement as a public officer in the administration of the repealed Act.
(sec.77-ssec.2) The person is taken to have gained the information because of the person’s involvement as a public officer in the new Act’s administration.
(sec.77-ssec.3) The person may make a record of the confidential information, or disclose it to someone else, under section 65(3) of the new Act, even if the person gained the information before the commencement.
(sec.77-ssec.4) In this section— public officer includes a former member of the former misconduct tribunal established under the repealed Misconduct Tribunals Act 1997 , section 11 .
ch.8-pt.2
Transitional provision for Public Service and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2012
Transitional provision for Public Service and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2012
sec.78
Continuation of standards made by oversight agency
sec.78 Continuation of standards made by oversight agency
This section applies to standards made by the Public Service Commission under section 60 that are in force immediately before the commencement of this section.
The standards are taken, on the commencement, to be the standards made by the ombudsman as the oversight agency.
s 78 ins 2012 No. 22 s 19
(sec.78-ssec.1) This section applies to standards made by the Public Service Commission under section 60 that are in force immediately before the commencement of this section.
(sec.78-ssec.2) The standards are taken, on the commencement, to be the standards made by the ombudsman as the oversight agency.
ch.8-pt.3
Transitional provision for Crime and Corruption and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2024
Transitional provision for Crime and Corruption and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2024
sec.79
Application of s 13 to conduct of commission officer
sec.79 Application of s 13 to conduct of commission officer
Section 13, as amended by the Crime and Corruption and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2024 , applies to the conduct of a commission officer whether the conduct occurs before or after, or both before and after, the commencement.
s 79 ins 2024 No. 41 s 54
Source text: opening excerpt
Sourced from Queensland Legislation (legislation.qld.gov.au), CC BY 4.0.
ch.1-pt.1 Introduction
Introduction
sec.1 Short title
sec.1 Short title
This Act may be cited as the Public Interest Disclosure Act 2010 .
sec.2 Commencement
sec.2 Commencement
This Act commences on a day to be fixed by proclamation.
ch.1-pt.2 Main objects
Main objects
sec.3 Main objects of Act
sec.3 Main objects of Act
The main objects of this Act are—
to promote the public interest by facilitating public interest disclosures of wrongdoing in the public sector; and
to ensure that public interest disclosures are properly assessed and, when appropriate, properly investigated and dealt with; and
to ensure that appropriate consideration is given to the interests of persons who are the subject of a public interest disclosure; and
to afford protection from reprisals to persons making public interest disclosures.
(a) to promote the public interest by facilitating public interest disclosures of wrongdoing in the public sector; and
(b) to ensure that public interest disclosures are properly assessed and, when appropriate, properly investigated and dealt with; and
(c) to ensure that appropriate consideration is given to the interests of persons who are the subject of a public interest disclosure; and
(d) to afford protection from reprisals to persons making public interest disclosures.
ch.1-pt.3 Interpretation
Interpretation
sec.4 Definitions
sec.4 Definitions
The dictionary in schedule 4 defines particular words used in this Act.
sec.5 Meaning of proper authority
sec.5 Meaning of proper authority
A proper authority is—
a public sector entity; or
a member of the Legislative Assembly.
(a) a public sector entity; or
(b) a member of the Legislative Assembly.
sec.6 Meaning of public sector entity
sec.6 Meaning of public sector entity
A public sector entity is any of the following—
a committee of the Legislative Assembly, whether or not a statutory committee;
the parliamentary service;
a court or tribunal;
the administrative office attached to a court or tribunal;
the Executive Council;
a department;
The following are, or are included in, departments—
the Queensland Ambulance Service
the Queensland Fire and Rescue Service
the Queensland Police Service.
a local government;
a registered higher education provider or TAFE Queensland;
an entity established under an Act or under State or local government authorisation for a public, State or local government purpose;
an entity, prescribed under a regulation, that is assisted by public funds.
However, the following are not public sector entities—
a corporate entity, other than to the extent expressly stated in this Act;
a GOC, other than to the extent expressly stated in this Act;
the following entities under the Education (General Provisions) Act 2006 —
an advisory committee;
a non-State school;
a parents and citizens association;
an entity prescribed under a regulation.
Also, a State educational institution or school council is part of the department in which the Education (General Provisions) Act 2006 is administered.
See also the Corrective Services Act 2006 , section 273 (5) .
In this section—
registered higher education provider see the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (Cwlth) , section 5 .
TAFE Queensland means TAFE Queensland established under the TAFE Queensland Act 2013 , section 5 (1) .
s 6 amd 2013 No. 27 s 70 sch 1 pt 2 ; 2014 No. 4 s 44 sch 1 ; 2014 No. 25 s 223 sch 1 pt 2 ; 2014 No. 62 s 140 sch 1 ; 2020 No. 3 s 136 sch 1
(sec.6-ssec.1) A public sector entity is any of the following— a committee of the Legislative Assembly, whether or not a statutory committee; the parliamentary service; a court or tribunal; the administrative office attached to a court or tribunal; the Executive Council; a department; The following are, or are included in, departments— the Queensland Ambulance Service the Queensland Fire and Rescue Service the Queensland Police Service. a local government; a registered higher education provider or TAFE Queensland; an entity established under an Act or under State or local government authorisation for a public, State or local government purpose; an entity, prescribed under a regulation, that is assisted by public funds.
(sec.6-ssec.2) However, the following are not public sector entities— a corporate entity, other than to the extent expressly stated in this Act; a GOC, other than to the extent expressly stated in this Act; the following entities under the Education (General Provisions) Act 2006 — an advisory committee; a non-State school; a parents and citizens association; an entity prescribed under a regulation.
(sec.6-ssec.3) Also, a State educational institution or school council is part of the department in which the Education (General Provisions) Act 2006 is administered. See also the Corrective Services Act 2006 , section 273 (5) .
(sec.6-ssec.4) In this section— registered higher education provider see the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (Cwlth) , section 5 . TAFE Queensland means TAFE Queensland established under the TAFE Queensland Act 2013 , section 5 (1) .
Allows disclosures to be made in any manner, including anonymously, but requires use of a proper authority’s reasonable procedure if one exists (s 17). Specific internal recipients are listed where the proper authority is a public sector entity (s 17(3)).
Permits a person who has made a disclosure that has not been investigated, or where no outcome was reached or notified within six months, to disclose substantially the same information to a journalist (s 20), and declares such disclosure to a journalist remains a public interest disclosure for the Act’s purposes.
Creates protections for disclosers: immunity from civil, criminal and administrative liability (s 36), non-application of confidentiality obligations (s 37), and an absolute privilege defence in defamation proceedings (s 38).
Prohibits reprisals and defines them in broad terms (s 40). It makes taking a reprisal an indictable offence (penalty: 167 penalty units or two years imprisonment) (s 41), creates a statutory tort with damages remedies including exemplary damages (s 42), and provides for vicarious liability of public sector entities where employees take reprisals (s 43).
Provides administrative and injunctive remedies: rights to review and appeal (s 46), relocation applications for public service employees (s 47), and exclusive and supplementary injunction powers in the Industrial Relations Commission and Supreme Court (ss 48-56).
Requires public sector entities to adopt and publish reasonable procedures and to keep records of disclosures (ss 28-29), and enables the oversight agency to make standards and to require information from entities (s 33).
The Act therefore is both a procedural scheme (how to make and handle disclosures) and a protective regime (legal immunities, criminal liability for reprisals, civil damages and injunctive relief). The text itself supplies cross-references to other statutes and instruments that affect application and interaction, for example the Crime and Corruption Act, the Corporations Act, the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991, the Industrial Relations Act 2016, the Public Sector Act 2022 and the Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (see ss 13, 19, 32, 42, 46-49, 56, and transitional provisions).
Main concepts
The Act organises its protections and duties around a handful of repeatable legal concepts. Each concept has definitional or operational consequences in the text.
Public interest disclosure (s 11)
The Act confines “public interest disclosure” to disclosures under chapter 2 and expressly includes the information and help the discloser gives to a proper authority (s 11). The chapter sets who can disclose, what may be disclosed and to whom.
Proper authority and public sector entity (ss 5-6)
“Proper authority” means either a public sector entity or a member of the Legislative Assembly (s 5). The list of what counts as a public sector entity is extensive and prescribes inclusions and explicit exclusions (s 6). The definition determines who may receive disclosures as proper authorities, and therefore who triggers the Act’s protections and duties.
Who may disclose and what may be disclosed (chs 2 pt 2)
Two parallel entry points exist. Section 12 permits “any person” (including non-public officers) to disclose specified categories: substantial and specific danger to the health or safety of a person with a disability; commission or likely commission of environmental offences listed in schedule 2; contraventions of conditions under schedule 2 that threaten the environment; and conduct that could be a reprisal. Section 13 extends the classes of concerns that a public officer may disclose, including corrupt conduct, serious maladministration, substantial misuse of public resources and dangers to public health, safety and the environment. Both sections apply an objective or honest-belief threshold: the person may have the information if they either honestly believe on reasonable grounds that it tends to show the matter, or if the information tends to show the matter regardless of honest belief (ss 12(3), 13(3)).
Channels for disclosure and internal procedure requirements (s 17)
Disclosures may be made in any way, including anonymously, but where a proper authority has a reasonable procedure, that procedure must be used (s 17(1)-(2)). Where the proper authority is a public sector entity, the Act lists particular internal recipients who may be appropriate; the Act does not displace procedures required under other Acts (s 17(3)-(4)).
Limits and special pathways (ss 14-16, 19)
A member of the Legislative Assembly is a proper authority, except for disclosures that relate to a judicial officer (s 14). Disclosures about judicial officers are generally limited to chief judicial officers or the Crime and Corruption Commission; chief judicial officers may refer disclosures to public sector entities (s 16). Employees of GOCs and rail government entities have a separate pathway in s 19, and the section is declared a Corporations Act displacement provision, so it displaces inconsistent Corporations Act provisions to the extent necessary (s 19).
Protection from reprisal and remedies (chs 3-4)
The Act criminalises taking reprisals (s 41), makes reprisal a tort with damages remedies (s 42), and provides immunity for disclosers against civil, criminal or disciplinary liability (s 36). It excludes the Workers’ Compensation Act from applying to damages proceedings under s 42 (s 42(6)). Vicarious liability attaches to public sector entities for employee reprisals, unless the entity proves reasonable steps were taken (s 43). The Act also balances managerial needs by preserving the right to take reasonable management action, provided the reason for the action does not include the fact of disclosure (s 45).
Information management and oversight (ss 28-33)
The chief executive officer of a public sector entity must establish reasonable procedures, publish them on the entity’s website and keep records of disclosures (ss 28-29). The oversight agency may make standards and may require information from entities as to disclosures (s 33). Section 30 lists circumstances where an entity may decide not to investigate and imposes a duty to provide written reasons and a review right within 28 days.
Journalist disclosure and timing (s 20)
If a discloser has made a disclosure and the entity either decided not to investigate, investigated but recommended no action, or did not advise within six months whether action would be taken, the discloser may give substantially the same information to a journalist (s 20(1)-(2)). The Act declares such disclosure to a journalist to be a public interest disclosure and contains specific consequences as to the journalist’s status under certain other sections (s 20(3)).
Remedial and enforcement architecture (secs 41-56)
In addition to criminal and civil remedies for reprisals, the Act constructs injunctive remedies and processes in the Industrial Relations Commission and Supreme Court for restraining and remedying reprisals (ss 48-56), including exclusive jurisdictional rules. The Act also provides for relocation applications for public service employees where reprisal risk is likely and relocation is the only practical remedy (s 47).
These core concepts are expressed as duties on public sector chief executives to build procedures and keep records, and as rights on disclosers for immunity and remedies, with discrete procedural gates for who receives what disclosures and when. The Act also contains a number of cross-statutory references and transitional provisions (see ss 19, 32, 42 and ch 8).
Who it affects
The Act defines a set of actors with roles, duties or rights, and identifies other groups that interact with the regime in particular ways.
Disclosers and potential disclosers
Any person can make certain types of disclosure under s 12, including non-public officers. Public officers may make broader disclosures under s 13. Disclosers include those who may be unable to identify a person connected to the matter (s 21) and those compelled by law to disclose (s 22).
Public sector entities and their officers
Public sector entities are central recipients and are listed in s 6: committees of the Legislative Assembly, parliamentary service, courts and tribunals, Executive Council, departments (including Queensland Ambulance Service, Queensland Fire and Rescue Service and Queensland Police Service), local governments, registered higher education providers, TAFE Queensland, entities established under Acts for State or local government purposes, and entities prescribed by regulation that receive public funds. Specific exclusions are also provided (s 6). The chief executive officer of each public sector entity has express duties: to establish reasonable procedures (s 28) and to keep records of disclosures (s 29). Chief executive officer is further defined and can be specified by regulation for particular entities (s 8).
Public officers
The Act defines a “public officer” to include employees, members and officers of an entity and contains special inclusions for Ministers and ministerial staff (s 7). Public officers have the expanded disclosure rights under s 13, may be protected under the Act, and may also be the subject of reprisal protections and remedies.
Members of the Legislative Assembly
Members are proper authorities under s 5 and may receive disclosures under ss 12 and 13 (s 14). When a member receives a disclosure the member may refer it to a public sector entity under s 34 but has no role in investigating (s 34(2)).
Judicial officers
Disclosures relating to judicial officers are tightly limited. Except for disclosures made under s 23 (court/tribunal evidence), disclosures that could amount to corrupt conduct or reprisal may only be made to the chief judicial officer of the relevant court or tribunal or to the Crime and Corruption Commission (s 16(2)). Other disclosures relating to judicial officers may only be made to the chief judicial officer (s 16(3)). Chief judicial officers may receive disclosures only about other judicial officers of the same court or tribunal (s 16(4)), and may refer disclosures to a public sector entity (s 16(5)). Section 14 expressly removes members of the Legislative Assembly as proper authorities for disclosures relating to judicial officers (s 14(2)).
Employees of GOCs and rail government entities
Section 19 provides a pathway for employees of GOCs or rail government entities to make disclosures relating to corrupt conduct by colleagues or reprisals related to previous disclosures to the GOC, rail government entity or the Crime and Corruption Commission; disclosures may be made to the GOC, rail government entity or the Crime and Corruption Commission (s 19(2)). Section 19 is declared a Corporations Act displacement provision in relation to s 1317AE, so it suppresses inconsistent Corporations Act provisions to the extent necessary (s 19).
Oversight agency and standards
The Act contemplates an oversight agency empowered to make standards (s 33 refers to the oversight agency making standards under s 60). The oversight agency can require entities to provide disclosure information and prescribe format and timing under a standard (s 33).
Journalists and the media
A person who has previously made a public interest disclosure and meets the conditions in s 20 may disclose substantially the same information to a journalist. The Act defines who counts as a journalist for this purpose and declares that a journalist who receives such information is treated in particular ways for other sections (s 20(4)).
Courts and tribunals and other enforcement bodies
The Act engages multiple adjudicative bodies: the Industrial Relations Commission (for injunctions under s 48 and relocation directions under s 47), the Supreme Court (s 49), District Court and Supreme Court for damages proceedings (s 42(3)), and the Crime and Corruption Commission for some disclosures and investigative overlaps (ss 13, 19, 32, 48-49). The Anti-Discrimination Commission and the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 are directly implicated for complaints about reprisals (s 44).
Other stakeholders
Managers and employers (including private sector employers who are not public sector entities) are affected by reprisal prohibitions and related civil liability provisions. A public sector entity may be vicariously liable for the acts of employees (s 43). The Act also preserves the capacity for managers to take reasonable management action (s 45).
In short, the Act maps a broad set of roles: disclosers (any person, wider classes for public officers), recipients (public sector entities, members of Parliament, and specified institutions), investigators/oversight (public sector entities, Crime and Corruption Commission, oversight agency, courts and commissions), and third parties such as journalists. Each role carries specific duties, for example, chief executives’ procedural and record-keeping obligations (ss 28-29) and public sector entities’ duty to inform disclosers (s 32).
Key duties and rights
The Act allocates clear duties to public sector chief executives and rights to disclosers, alongside remedial rights and procedural obligations. Below I set out the principal operative duties and the corresponding rights with section references.
Duties imposed on public sector entities and chief executives
Establish reasonable procedures: The chief executive officer must establish reasonable procedures to ensure appropriate support for public officers who make disclosures, proper assessment and investigation of disclosures, appropriate action for wrongdoing, development and implementation of a management program consistent with any oversight standard (s 28(1)(a)-(d)). The chief executive must also ensure procedures are published on the entity’s website (s 28(2)).
Record-keeping: If a public interest disclosure is made to, or referred to, a public sector entity, the chief executive must keep a proper record that includes the discloser’s name (if known), the information disclosed, any action taken and any other information required by oversight standards (s 29(1)-(2)). The section excludes courts and the Executive Council from “public sector entity” for this record requirement (s 29(3)).
Decision not to investigate: Entities may decline to investigate for enumerated reasons (e.g. matters already investigated, matters for other processes, age or triviality or because another entity with jurisdiction has notified investigation is not warranted) (s 30(1)). When an entity decides not to investigate it must give written reasons to the discloser, and the discloser may seek a review by the chief executive within 28 days (s 30(2)-(3)).
Referrals: A receiving public sector entity may refer a disclosure to another public sector entity when the referral entity has investigatory or remedial power for that matter (s 31(1)). A public sector entity must not refer if it considers there is an unacceptable risk of reprisal because of the referral; in considering this risk it must, if practicable, consult the discloser (s 31(3)-(4)).
Information provision and confidentiality exceptions: A public sector entity must give the discloser (or referring entity) reasonable information about the disclosure (confirmation of receipt, description of proposed/taken action and results) in writing, unless giving that information would likely adversely affect safety, an investigation or necessary confidentiality regarding an informant’s existence or identity (s 32(1)-(4)).
Rights and protections for disclosers
Immunity from liability: A person who makes a public interest disclosure is not subject to civil or criminal liability or liability arising by administrative process, including disciplinary action, for making the disclosure (s 36).
Exemption from confidentiality constraints: A discloser is not guilty of an offence under an Act imposing duties to maintain confidentiality, nor in breach of obligations of oath, rule of law, practice or agreement restricting disclosure by making a public interest disclosure (s 37).
Defamation defence: In defamation proceedings, a discloser has an absolute privilege defence for publishing the information disclosed (s 38).
Protection from reprisals: The Act makes it unlawful for any person to cause or attempt to cause detriment because they believe another has made, intends to make, or is involved in proceedings under the Act (s 40). Taking a reprisal is a criminal offence (s 41) and a tort (s 42).
Remedies: Damages for reprisal are expressly provided, including the availability of exemplary damages where appropriate; proceedings may be brought even where no prosecution is brought under s 41; trials in the Supreme or District Court on such claims are to be by judge without jury (s 42).
Injunctive relief and administrative remedies: Injunctions against reprisals can be sought in the Industrial Relations Commission where the reprisal affects an employee and involves or may involve a breach of the Industrial Relations Act or an industrial instrument (s 48), and in the Supreme Court where the applicant cannot access the industrial jurisdiction (s 49). The Act also permits interim injunctions and provides for the courts to impose remedial orders and to control publication or evidence as necessary (ss 51-56).
Journalist disclosure: Where a discloser’s disclosure is not investigated or is not notified within six months, the discloser may disclose substantially the same information to a journalist; the Act declares such disclosure to remain a public interest disclosure (s 20).
Right to review/appeal: Public officers who can appeal or request review under other Acts may also appeal or apply to have actions set aside where those actions were taken as a reprisal (s 46). Public service employees have a statutory relocation remedy where reprisal risk is likely and relocation is the only practical way to remove the risk (s 47).
Managerial and employer duties
Reasonable management action permitted: Managers are not prevented from taking lawful, reasonable management action against an employee who has made a disclosure, provided the action is not taken for the reason of the disclosure (s 45).
Vicarious liability and defence: Public sector entities can be held jointly and severally liable for employee reprisals, but may plead a defence of having taken reasonable steps to prevent the employee’s contravention (s 43).
Procedural obligations on disclosers
Use internal procedure where one exists: Disclosers must use a proper authority’s reasonable procedure if it exists (s 17(2)). Where the proper authority is a public sector entity, the Act lists internal recipients who may be appropriate (s 17(3)).
Oversight and standards
The Act contemplates standards to be made by an oversight agency (under s 60; s 33), and gives the oversight agency the power to require reporting consistent with any standard (s 33). The chief executive’s management program for disclosures must be consistent with such standards (s 28(1)(d)).
Taken together, the Act places operational duties on chief executives to build and publish procedures, to keep records and to consult disclosers where necessary; it gives disclosers immunities and procedural and substantive remedies; and it furnishes enforcement mechanisms through criminal sanctions, civil tort remedies and injunctive relief. The Act also establishes interaction points with other statutory regimes and gives managerial actors limited scope to act provided their reasons are not disclosure-driven.
Penalties and enforcement
The Act combines criminal sanctions, civil liability (including exemplary damages), injunctive remedies and administrative review. Enforcement tools are tailored to the type of wrongful conduct and to the status of the affected person.
Criminal penalty for reprisals
Taking a reprisal is an indictable offence with a stated maximum penalty of 167 penalty units or two years imprisonment (s 41(1)-(2)). The Act defines reprisals broadly: causing, attempting or conspiring to cause detriment because, or in the belief that, a person has made or intends to make a public interest disclosure or is involved in a proceeding under the Act (s 40(1)-(4)). An attempt to cause detriment includes an attempt to induce a person to cause detriment (s 40(2)).
Civil remedies and damages
Reprisals are a tort. Section 42 establishes that a person who takes a reprisal is liable in damages to any person who suffers detriment. The court may award any appropriate remedy available for a tort, including exemplary damages (s 42(2)). Proceedings may be brought regardless of whether there has been or will be a criminal prosecution under s 41 (s 42(5)). If the claim goes to trial in the Supreme Court or District Court, it must be decided by a judge sitting without a jury (s 42(3)). The Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 does not apply to damages proceedings under this section (s 42(6)).
Vicarious liability and corporate/public entity exposure
If an employee contravenes s 40 in the course of employment, both the public sector entity and the employee are jointly and severally liable under s 42; proceedings may be brought against either or both (s 43(1)). It is a defence for the public sector entity to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that reasonable steps were taken to prevent the employee’s contravention (s 43(2)). This extends to GOCs (s 43(3) as amended).
Injunctions and equitable relief
The Act empowers two primary routes for injunctions relating to reprisals:
Industrial jurisdiction: Employees can apply to the Industrial Relations Commission for an injunction where the reprisal has caused or may cause detriment to an employee and involves or may involve breach of the Industrial Relations Act or an industrial instrument. The application may be made by the employee, an industrial organisation acting for the employee, or the Crime and Corruption Commission in specified circumstances (s 48). If the industrial commission has jurisdiction, that jurisdiction is exclusive other than in the Industrial Court (s 48(4)). The Industrial Relations Act provisions apply subject to this part (s 48(3)).
Supreme Court: Persons who cannot apply under s 48 may apply to the Supreme Court for an injunction (s 49). The Crime and Corruption Commission may act on behalf of a public officer in certain circumstances with consent.
The courts may grant interim injunctions pending final decision (s 54). The court may also make remedial orders requiring stated action to remedy detriment (s 52), and can grant injunctive relief even where there is no imminent danger of substantial damage or previous conduct (s 53).
The courts may limit publication of hearings or withhold evidence if disclosure would not be in the public interest or if third parties lack a sufficient legitimate interest (s 55). Applications may be heard without notice in appropriate circumstances (s 55(3)).
Administrative remedies, reviews and internal procedures
If a public sector entity decides not to investigate a disclosure, it must give written reasons and the discloser may apply to the chief executive for review within 28 days (s 30(2)-(3)). Section 46 preserves and extends rights of appeal or review available under other Acts for public officers, and allows an appeal on grounds that the action was a reprisal (s 46).
Public service employees may apply to the Industrial Relations Commission for relocation where reprisal risk is likely and relocation is the only practical remedy; the Commission may direct relocation with the employee’s and receiving chief executive’s consent (s 47).
Cross-statutory enforcement relationships
The Act permits complaints under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 in relation to reprisals; the complaint may be dealt with under that Act as if it were an alleged contravention of the Anti-Discrimination Act (s 44(1)-(2)). However, if a person commences proceedings under s 42 they cannot then make a complaint under the Anti-Discrimination Act about the same reprisal, and vice versa (s 44(3)).
Section 19 is declared a Corporations Act displacement provision as to s 1317AE, so State rules about GOC disclosures displace inconsistent Corporations Act provisions to the extent required (s 19).
The Crime and Corruption Commission is integrated into the enforcement architecture: it is an exclusive recipient for certain disclosures (e.g. judicial officer disclosures and where a commission officer is implicated) and may act in the interests of employees or disclosers in seeking injunctions (ss 13, 16, 48-49).
Practical enforcement mechanics and evidentiary points
The Act makes clear that it is sufficient for a reprisal finding if the unlawful ground (the disclosure or involvement in proceeding) was a substantial ground for the detrimental act, even if there were other grounds for the act or omission (s 40(5)). This lowers an evidentiary hurdle for claimants to show causation in motive-based disputes.
The Act preserves managers’ ability to take legitimate management action, but only when the action is not motivated by the fact of disclosure (s 45). This interacts with enforcement in that employers may defend actions as reasonable management action, shifting the litigation question to proof of motive.
Together, these provisions create a multi-branch enforcement regime: criminal sanctions for deliberate reprisals, civil tort remedies for injured disclosers, injunctive and equitable relief for ongoing or threatened reprisals, administrative review rights and data/reporting obligations for entities. The Act places evidentiary emphasis on the motive (substantial ground test) and gives public sector entities both exposure and a defence where reasonable preventative steps have been taken.
How it interacts with other laws
The Act contains explicit cross-references and non-exclusive interactions with a range of Commonwealth and State statutes and instruments. Those interactions affect applicability, remedies and procedural choices.
Corporations Act and GOCs
Section 19, dealing with disclosures by employees of Government Owned Corporations (GOCs) and rail government entities, is declared a Corporations legislation displacement provision for the purposes of the Corporations Act, s 5G, in relation to s 1317AE of the Corporations Act. The effect is that to the extent of any inconsistency between the State disclosure regime (s 19) and the Corporations Act’s protections for whistleblowing, the State provision displaces the Corporations Act provision to avoid inconsistency (s 19(10)-(11)). Practitioners should treat the GOC pathway as a specially declared alternative to certain Corporations Act protections, with parallel obligations to use internal procedures where reasonable procedures exist (s 19(4)-(5)).
Crime and Corruption Act and Commission officers
The Act cross-references the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 when identifying “commission officers” and “unit of public administration” in s 13, and makes special provision for disclosures involving commission officers (s 13(4)). Disclosures relating to judicial officers may be made to the Crime and Corruption Commission (s 16(2)). The Crime and Corruption Commission is also authorised to act in the interests of employees when applying for injunctions under s 48 and s 49 when the reprisal involves conduct the Commission may investigate (ss 48(2)(c), 49(2)(b)).
Anti-Discrimination Act 1991
Reprisals may be pursued under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991: a person may make a complaint under that Act about a reprisal and the complaint will be dealt with under that Act as if it were an alleged contravention (s 44(1)-(2)). The Act creates an election rule: once proceedings under s 42 are commenced, the discloser cannot later make a complaint under the Anti-Discrimination Act and vice versa (s 44(3)).
Industrial Relations Act 2016 and industrial instruments
The Industrial Relations Commission has exclusive jurisdiction to grant injunctions in matters where the reprisal has caused or may cause detriment to an employee and involves, or may involve, breach of the Industrial Relations Act or an industrial instrument (s 48(1)-(4)). The Act also treats relocation applications by public service employees as appeals under the Public Sector Act 2022 and grants powers to the Industrial Relations Commission to direct relocation (s 47(3)-(6)).
Public Sector Act 2022 and public service relocation
Section 47 treats an application for relocation as an appeal against a decision under the Public Sector Act 2022 not to relocate, and deems that decision to have been made by the chief executive on the day the employee applies (s 47(4)). The Industrial Relations Commission may direct relocation within or between departments with the relevant consents (s 47(5)-(6)).
Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003
The Act expressly excludes the Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 from applying to damages proceedings brought under s 42 (s 42(6)). That means an employee bringing a s 42 tort claim will not be limited to workers’ compensation processes in respect of reprisals.
Defamation and confidentiality provisions
The Act overrides confidentiality duties and grants absolute privilege in defamation proceedings for publications made as public interest disclosures (ss 37-38). It therefore displaces, for disclosures made under the Act, other statutory or contractual confidentiality obligations and provides an absolute defence in defamation actions.
Other Acts and procedural precedence
The Act contains non-derogation clauses: it does not affect procedures required under other Acts for disclosing particular types of information (s 17(4)), and it does not limit protections available under other laws to disclosers (s 10). Where there is inconsistency with another law that limits protection, the other law prevails to the extent of the inconsistency (s 10(2)). This preserves pre-existing or later-enacted statutory regimes that provide stronger protections or alternative mechanisms.
Court and tribunal interfaces
The Act contemplates interactions with courts and tribunals: s 23 treats disclosure to a court or tribunal in a proceeding as a public interest disclosure and allows the court to refer the disclosure to another proper authority; such referrals are treated as if from a public sector entity (s 23(2)-(4)). The Act names the Supreme Court and District Court as venues for damages trials and specifies judge-alone adjudication for such trials (s 42(3)).
Standards and oversight
The Act envisages an oversight agency making standards (s 33 referring to s 60). Those standards can impose record and reporting obligations on chief executives (s 29) and define the content and timing of information that entities must provide to the oversight agency (s 33).
Transitional provisions
The Act contains transitional provisions that integrate with the repealed Whistleblowers Protection Act 1994 and other amendment Acts. For example, disclosures made under the repealed Act are taken to be public interest disclosures under the new Act (s 74), and standards previously made by the Public Service Commission are taken to be standards of the Ombudsman on commencement (s 78).
Practically, these interactions mean practitioners must consider parallel or overlapping statutory schemes,Corporations Act protections for whistleblowers, anti-discrimination processes, industrial relations remedies and Crime and Corruption Commission jurisdiction,when advising clients. The Act sometimes displaces, sometimes preserves and sometimes supplements other provisions; each cross-reference in text identifies where to look for operational consequences.
Amendment history
The text of the Act as supplied contains several embedded amendment annotations and transitional insertion notes. The Act has been amended across multiple years and by multiple Acts; the material provided records those amendments in section footnotes and transitional parts. Key amendment entries in the source include:
Section 6 (meaning of public sector entity) shows amendments and insertions across multiple Acts and years: amended 2013 No. 27 s 70 sch 1 pt 2; 2014 No. 4 s 44 sch 1; 2014 No. 25 s 223 sch 1 pt 2; 2014 No. 62 s 140 sch 1; 2020 No. 3 s 136 sch 1. The text records the section’s multiple subparagraph structure and explanatory notes added by amendment (s 6 amd 2013 No. 27 s 70 sch 1 pt 2; 2014 No. 4 s 44 sch 1; 2014 No. 25 s 223 sch 1 pt 2 ; 2014 No. 62 s 140 sch 1 ; 2020 No. 3 s 136 sch 1).
Section 7 (public officer definition) records amendments by 2012 No. 6 s 27 sch amendments (s 7 amd 2012 No. 6 s 27 sch amdts 1(1)(d), (2), 2(1)(e), (2)). The section’s current text includes ministerial staff member and Assistant Minister inclusions.
Section 8 (chief executive officer) includes a power to prescribe a person by regulation to be treated as chief executive officer for particular disclosures; the text includes the admonition that regulations may not prescribe a chief executive officer for an entity listed in schedule 1 other than a part of a department (s 8(2)-(3)).
Section 13 (public officer disclosures) lists amendments by 2014 No. 21 s 94(2) sch 2 and 2024 No. 41 s 50 (s 13 amd 2014 No. 21 s 94 (2) sch 2 ; 2024 No. 41 s 50). The 2024 amendment is noted in transitional s 79 which provides that s 13 as amended by the Crime and Corruption and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2024 applies to commission officer conduct whether occurring before or after commencement (s 79).
Section 19 (GOC disclosures) records amendments by 2013 No. 19 s 120 sch 1; 2014 No. 21 s 94 (2) sch 2; 2019 No. 9 s 97 (s 19 amd 2013 No. 19 s 120 sch 1 ; 2014 No. 21 s 94 (2) sch 2 ; 2019 No. 9 s 97).
Section 28 includes an express reference to standards made under section 60; transitional section 78 notes that standards made by the Public Service Commission under s 60, which were in force immediately before the commencement of s 78, are taken to be standards made by the Ombudsman as oversight agency (s 78 ins 2012 No. 22 s 19).
Section 43 (vicarious liability) contains amendment notes indicating 2013 No. 19 s 120 sch 1 and 2012 No. 33 s 192 sch changes (s 43 amd 2013 No. 19 s 120 sch 1 ; 2012 No. 33 s 192 sch).
Transitional provisions in ch 8 address the Act No. 38 of 2010 commencement, treatment of earlier disclosures under the repealed Whistleblowers Protection Act 1994 (s 74), timing for vicarious liability and Anti-Discrimination complaints (ss 75-76), and confidentiality of information (s 77). Section 73 defines terms for these transitional provisions and is itself noted as amended by 2024 No. 41 s 52.
Section 56 (Crime and Corruption Commission injunctions) notes an amendment: “s 56 amd 2014 No. 21 s 94 (2) sch 2”.
The supplied text therefore records a history of iterative statutory change focused on definitional refinements, the treatment of particular public sector entities, the roles of oversight bodies and the interface with corruption and corporation processes. The transitional provisions show integration with older whistleblower legislation and reflect reallocation of oversight standard-making powers (Public Service Commission to Ombudsman). Section 79 is an explicit transitional provision inserted by the 2024 Crime and Corruption and Other Legislation Amendment Act confirming the retrospective and prospective application of amendments to s 13 as they relate to commission officers.
This is the amendment record available in the supplied act text. The Act contains inline footnote-style amendment traces that identify the amending instrument and year; practitioners should consult the consolidated Act and parliamentary amendment history for full context and exact commencement dates for specific amendments.
Litigation history
The supplied legislative text does not list or cite judicial decisions or cases that have interpreted the Act. The text does not supply a litigation history. However, the Act creates several statutory causes of action and enforcement pathways that will naturally give rise to litigation in courts and tribunals, and it specifies forum rules and procedural features likely to shape litigation strategy. Relevant provisions creating adjudicable claims, enforcement pathways and litigation-linked constraints are:
Criminal prosecutions: Taking a reprisal is an indictable offence (s 41). Prosecutorial practice under this section will be governed by standard criminal procedure in Queensland courts.
Civil tort for reprisal and damages: Reprisals are a tort with damages remedies, including exemplary damages (s 42). The Act specifies that if a damages claim goes to trial in the Supreme Court or District Court it must be decided by a judge sitting without a jury (s 42(3)). Section 42(5) allows civil proceedings to be commenced regardless of whether a criminal prosecution has been brought.
Vicarious liability litigation: Public sector entities may be sued jointly and severally with employees for reprisal torts, with a statutory defence of having taken reasonable steps to prevent contravention (s 43). Litigation under s 42-43 will therefore involve questions of vicarious liability, corporate preventive conduct, and the standard of “reasonable steps”.
Injunction and equitable remedies: The Industrial Relations Commission has exclusive jurisdiction to grant injunctions where reprisals have caused or may cause detriment to an employee and relate to industrial law breaches (s 48(4)). The Supreme Court is an alternative forum where the industrial jurisdiction is not available (s 49). The Act contemplates interim injunctions (s 54), orders to remedy detriment (s 52) and powers to restrict publication or evidence (s 55). Litigation strategies will therefore include forum selection (industrial commission vs Supreme Court), urgency applications for interim relief and confidentiality orders.
Administrative and appellate litigation: Public officers retain the rights of appeal or review available under other Acts, and may appeal on grounds that an action was the taking of a reprisal (s 46). Entities deciding not to investigate must give written reasons and disclosers may seek review by the chief executive within 28 days (s 30). These provisions create administrative review avenues that may lead to judicial review or appeal in some cases, subject to the governing statutory ladder in other Acts.
Interaction with other statutory processes: The Act interlocks with Anti-Discrimination Act complaint processes (s 44). The election rule in s 44(3) ordinarily prevents duplicative proceedings - that will affect litigation choices and cause-of-action election strategies. The exclusive jurisdiction rule for injunctive relief in certain industrial matters (s 48(4)) affects jurisdictional choices.
Procedural and evidentiary rules: The Act’s “substantial ground” test for unlawful motive (s 40(5)) and its preservation of reasonable management action (s 45) will shape fact patterns litigated. The Act’s immunity clauses (s 36) and absolute privilege for defamation (s 38) will be raised defensively in civil proceedings.
Although no cases are recorded in the supplied text, the Act’s structure points to types of litigation likely to emerge: tort claims for reprisals under s 42; criminal prosecutions under s 41; injunction applications under ss 48-49 and Supreme Court discretion as to interim or final relief; administrative reviews of non-investigation decisions under s 30 and appeals under other specialist Acts (s 46); jurisdictional litigation about whether the industrial commission has exclusive jurisdiction (s 48(4)); and vicarious liability litigation against public sector entities (s 43). Parties and advisors in such litigation will need to pay attention to forum selection, evidentiary burdens about motive and causation, statutory defences (reasonable steps by employer, lawful reasonable management action), and election of remedies under overlapping statutory schemes (s 44).
For any actual litigation history, practitioners should consult court databases and consolidated reported decisions outside the statutory text.
Gotchas
The Act’s mechanics produce specific operational risks and traps for both disclosers and entities. Below are concrete issues to watch for, grounded in the statutory text.
Use of internal procedures is mandatory where “reasonable procedure” exists (s 17(2))
Where a proper authority has adopted a reasonable procedure for making public interest disclosures, the discloser must use that procedure. Failure to use an entity’s procedure may compromise the discloser’s procedural standing and could complicate subsequent reliance on protections that presuppose a disclosure was properly made to a proper authority (s 17(2), s 17(5)). Entities therefore need to ensure procedures are accessible and clearly described on their websites, because the Act also requires procedures to be published (s 28(2)).
Anonymity vs record-keeping (ss 17, 29)
The Act allows anonymous disclosures (s 17(1)), but chief executives must keep records that include the name of the person making the disclosure, if known (s 29(1)). Entities need processes to reconcile anonymous channels and statutory record-keeping obligations. Disclosers who choose anonymity should understand that anonymity may limit an entity’s capacity to consult them about referral risk (s 31(4)) or to provide the written information about action proposed or taken (s 32).
Judicial officer disclosures are narrowly channelled (s 16)
Disclosures relating to judicial officers can generally only be made to the chief judicial officer of the relevant court or tribunal or to the Crime and Corruption Commission (s 16(2)). A member of the Legislative Assembly is expressly excluded as a proper authority for judicial officer disclosures (s 14(2)). A discloser or practitioner who inadvertently uses the wrong channel may find the disclosure is not a proper public interest disclosure under the Act, affecting protections available.
Journalist disclosure timing and scope (s 20)
A discloser may only disclose substantially the same information to a journalist where the receiving entity decided not to investigate, investigated but recommended no action, or did not notify the discloser within six months whether the disclosure would be investigated or dealt with (s 20(1)). Practitioners should be careful when advising a client about leaking to media: the pre-conditions in s 20 must be satisfied. The Act also declares the journalist to remain outside the ambit of particular “relevant person” or s 65 constructs (s 20(3)), but those cross-references refer to provisions not included in this supplied text; do not assume wider immunities beyond s 20’s declaration.
Declining to investigate has notice and review obligations (s 30)
Entities may decline investigation for enumerated reasons but must give written reasons and provide a 28-day review route by the chief executive (s 30(2)-(3)). Failure by an entity to give written reasons or to manage internal review can be a procedural weakness and a trigger for external challenge or further disclosure (including to journalists under s 20).
“Substantial ground” motive test (s 40(5))
For a contravention to amount to a reprisal it is sufficient that the unlawful ground (eg the disclosure) was a substantial ground for the detriment, even if there were other grounds (s 40(5)). This lowers the burden on plaintiffs to prove purely pretextual motive. Employers who fail to document legitimate, contemporaneous non-disclosure reasons may face difficulty defending claims that their actions were motivated by reasons other than the disclosure.
Reasonable management action defence (s 45)
Managers may take reasonable management action so long as the action was not taken for the reason that the employee made a disclosure. Employers must document reasons for management action carefully to establish they were not disclosure-motivated. The Act lists illustrative examples of reasonable management actions (s 45(3)), but the permissible scope will depend on factual context.
Vicarious liability and the “reasonable steps” defence (s 43)
Public sector entities face joint and several liability for employee reprisals unless they can prove reasonable steps were taken to prevent the contravention. Entities must maintain and evidence preventive systems, training, policies and supervision to engage this defence.
Journalist and media risks
Disclosing to a journalist under s 20 is expressly a public interest disclosure, but the act does not make the journalist liable for breach of other laws if they publish; it does declare a journalist is not a “relevant person” for s 64 and does not gain information “because of the journalist’s involvement in this Act’s administration” for s 65 purposes (s 20(3)). Practitioners should not assume these narrow statutory statements confer broader immunity from other legal risks such as defamation beyond s 38.
Interplay with other statutory processes and election of remedies (s 10, s 44)
The Act preserves protections under other laws (s 10(1)) and provides that, where inconsistent, the other law prevails to the extent of the inconsistency (s 10(2)). The election between a s 42 damages proceeding and an Anti-Discrimination complaint (s 44(3)) can foreclose parallel remedies. Advisers must plan remedy choice early.
Record and oversight standards (ss 29-33)
The oversight agency may make standards requiring chief executives to provide disclosure records and other information (s 33), and entities must maintain records consistent with oversight standards (s 29). Entities that under-resource record keeping and reporting risk non-compliance with standards which may have legal and administrative consequences.
Referral risks and consultation obligations (s 31)
A public sector entity must not refer a disclosure if it considers there is an unacceptable risk of reprisal because of the referral, and it must consult the discloser where practicable (s 31(3)-(4)). Failure to consult or to evaluate referral risks may be a compliance breach and create exposure.
Transitional and commencement nuances
Transitional provisions treat older disclosures under the repealed Whistleblowers Protection Act 1994 as disclosures under the new Act (s 74), but some rights (e.g. vicarious liability of employers, Anti-Discrimination complaint windows) apply only to reprisals occurring after the commencement (ss 75-76). Advisers must confirm dates of relevant conduct relative to commencement dates.
Overall, the “gotchas” arise from strict procedural gates (use of “reasonable procedures”), narrow channels for sensitive disclosures (judicial officers), timing constraints for media disclosures, overlapping remedies with other statutes and evidentiary standards that change the burden and shape of proof. Entities should systematically document procedures, outcomes and management actions; disclosers should follow prescribed channels and be mindful of the conditions for journalist disclosure and review windows.
How to comply
Compliance requires operationalising the Act’s procedural duties and using the Act’s protections correctly. Below are practical, text-grounded steps for public sector entities, managers and potential disclosers.
For public sector entities (chief executive responsibilities)
Establish and publish reasonable procedures (s 28)
Draft, approve and maintain a comprehensive disclosure handling procedure covering receipt, assessment, investigation, referral and outcomes.
Ensure the procedure provides support mechanisms for public officers who disclose, processes for assessing and investigating disclosures, and steps for deciding on appropriate action and implementing corrective measures (s 28(1)(a)-(c)).
Develop a management program for disclosures consistent with oversight standards referenced under s 60 and ensure the management program is implemented (s 28(1)(d)).
Publish procedures on the entity website promptly after making them (s 28(2)) so that disclosers are required to use them where reasonable procedures exist (s 17(2)).
Record-keeping and reporting (s 29, s 33)
Maintain proper records of every disclosure received or referred, including the discloser’s name where known, the information disclosed, action taken, and any other information required by oversight standards (s 29(1)-(2)).
Be prepared to furnish required information to the oversight agency in the manner and within periods set by standards (s 33). Ensure data systems are secure and capable of redaction where necessary to protect informant identity.
Referral decision-making and consultation (s 31)
Before referring a disclosure to another entity, assess whether the referral entity has the power to investigate or remedy the matter and whether a referral would create an unacceptable risk of reprisal.
If practicable, consult with the discloser when assessing referral risk (s 31(3)-(4)). Record the consultation and the risk assessment rationale.
Notification and reasons (s 30, s 32)
Provide written reasons if the entity decides not to investigate, including sufficient detail to allow the discloser to assess grounds for review. Track time limits so the discloser’s 28-day review option is clear (s 30(2
(a) a committee of the Legislative Assembly, whether or not a statutory committee;
(b) the parliamentary service;
(c) a court or tribunal;
(d) the administrative office attached to a court or tribunal;
(e) the Executive Council;
(f) a department; Note— The following are, or are included in, departments— • the Queensland Ambulance Service • the Queensland Fire and Rescue Service • the Queensland Police Service.
• the Queensland Ambulance Service
• the Queensland Fire and Rescue Service
• the Queensland Police Service.
(g) a local government;
(h) a registered higher education provider or TAFE Queensland;
(j) an entity established under an Act or under State or local government authorisation for a public, State or local government purpose;
(k) an entity, prescribed under a regulation, that is assisted by public funds.
• the Queensland Ambulance Service
• the Queensland Fire and Rescue Service
• the Queensland Police Service.
(a) a corporate entity, other than to the extent expressly stated in this Act;
(b) a GOC, other than to the extent expressly stated in this Act;
(c) the following entities under the Education (General Provisions) Act 2006 — (i) an advisory committee; (ii) a non-State school; (iii) a parents and citizens association;
(i) an advisory committee;
(ii) a non-State school;
(iii) a parents and citizens association;
(d) an entity prescribed under a regulation.
(i) an advisory committee;
(ii) a non-State school;
(iii) a parents and citizens association;
sec.7 Meaning of public officer
sec.7 Meaning of public officer
A public officer , of a public sector entity, is an employee, member or officer of the entity.
Also—
the Minister responsible for the administration of a department is a public officer of the department; and
a member of a school council is a public officer of the department in which the Education (General Provisions) Act 2006 is administered; and
a Ministerial staff member employed in the office of a Minister is a public officer of each department administered by the Minister; and
a Ministerial staff member employed in the office of an Assistant Minister is a public officer of each department for which the Assistant Minister is given responsibility under her or his functions.
Under the Constitution of Queensland 2001 , section 25 , an Assistant Minister has the functions decided by the Premier.
In this section—
Assistant Minister means a member of the Legislative Assembly appointed as an Assistant Minister under the Constitution of Queensland 2001 , section 24 .
ministerial staff member means a person employed under the Ministerial and Other Office Holder Staff Act 2010 as a staff member in the office of a Minister.
s 7 amd 2012 No. 6 s 27 sch amdts 1(1)(d), (2), 2(1)(e), (2)
(sec.7-ssec.1) A public officer , of a public sector entity, is an employee, member or officer of the entity.
(sec.7-ssec.2) Also— the Minister responsible for the administration of a department is a public officer of the department; and a member of a school council is a public officer of the department in which the Education (General Provisions) Act 2006 is administered; and a Ministerial staff member employed in the office of a Minister is a public officer of each department administered by the Minister; and a Ministerial staff member employed in the office of an Assistant Minister is a public officer of each department for which the Assistant Minister is given responsibility under her or his functions. Under the Constitution of Queensland 2001 , section 25 , an Assistant Minister has the functions decided by the Premier.
(sec.7-ssec.3) In this section— Assistant Minister means a member of the Legislative Assembly appointed as an Assistant Minister under the Constitution of Queensland 2001 , section 24 . ministerial staff member means a person employed under the Ministerial and Other Office Holder Staff Act 2010 as a staff member in the office of a Minister.
(a) the Minister responsible for the administration of a department is a public officer of the department; and
(b) a member of a school council is a public officer of the department in which the Education (General Provisions) Act 2006 is administered; and
(c) a Ministerial staff member employed in the office of a Minister is a public officer of each department administered by the Minister; and
(d) a Ministerial staff member employed in the office of an Assistant Minister is a public officer of each department for which the Assistant Minister is given responsibility under her or his functions. Note— Under the Constitution of Queensland 2001 , section 25 , an Assistant Minister has the functions decided by the Premier.
sec.8 Meaning of chief executive officer
sec.8 Meaning of chief executive officer
The chief executive officer of a public sector entity includes, if the entity is listed in schedule 1 , a person mentioned in the schedule as chief executive officer of the entity.
A regulation may prescribe a person who is to be treated as a chief executive officer of a particular public sector entity for all or particular public interest disclosures.
A regulation under subsection (2) may not prescribe a chief executive officer for a public sector entity mentioned in schedule 1 , other than a part of a department.
(sec.8-ssec.1) The chief executive officer of a public sector entity includes, if the entity is listed in schedule 1 , a person mentioned in the schedule as chief executive officer of the entity.
(sec.8-ssec.2) A regulation may prescribe a person who is to be treated as a chief executive officer of a particular public sector entity for all or particular public interest disclosures.
(sec.8-ssec.3) A regulation under subsection (2) may not prescribe a chief executive officer for a public sector entity mentioned in schedule 1 , other than a part of a department.
ch.1-pt.4 Operation of Act
Operation of Act
sec.9 Act binds all persons
sec.9 Act binds all persons
This Act binds all persons, including the State.
sec.10 Other protection saved
sec.10 Other protection saved
This Act does not limit the protection given by another law to a person who makes a disclosure of any type or affect another remedy available to the person.
If there is an inconsistency between this Act and another law mentioned in subsection (1) , the other law prevails to the extent of the inconsistency.
(sec.10-ssec.1) This Act does not limit the protection given by another law to a person who makes a disclosure of any type or affect another remedy available to the person.
(sec.10-ssec.2) If there is an inconsistency between this Act and another law mentioned in subsection (1) , the other law prevails to the extent of the inconsistency.
ch.2-pt.1 Interpretation
Interpretation
sec.11 Meaning of public interest disclosure
sec.11 Meaning of public interest disclosure
A public interest disclosure is a disclosure under this chapter and includes all information and help given by the discloser to a proper authority for the disclosure.
This chapter sets out requirements about the information that may be disclosed and who may disclose it, to whom, and how.
ch.2-pt.2 General public interest disclosures
General public interest disclosures
ch.2-pt.2-div.1 Information that may be disclosed and who may disclose it
Information that may be disclosed and who may disclose it
sec.12 Disclosure by any person
sec.12 Disclosure by any person
This section applies if a person (whether or not the person is a public officer) has information about—
a substantial and specific danger to the health or safety of a person with a disability; or
the commission of an offence against a provision mentioned in schedule 2 , if the commission of the offence is or would be a substantial and specific danger to the environment; or
a contravention of a condition imposed under a provision mentioned in schedule 2 , if the contravention is or would be a substantial and specific danger to the environment; or
the conduct of another person that could, if proved, be a reprisal.
The person may make a disclosure under section 17 in relation to the information to a proper authority.
For subsection (1) , a person has information about the conduct of another person or another matter if—
the person honestly believes on reasonable grounds that the information tends to show the conduct or other matter; or
the information tends to show the conduct or other matter, regardless of whether the person honestly believes the information tends to show the conduct or other matter.
(sec.12-ssec.1) This section applies if a person (whether or not the person is a public officer) has information about— a substantial and specific danger to the health or safety of a person with a disability; or the commission of an offence against a provision mentioned in schedule 2 , if the commission of the offence is or would be a substantial and specific danger to the environment; or a contravention of a condition imposed under a provision mentioned in schedule 2 , if the contravention is or would be a substantial and specific danger to the environment; or the conduct of another person that could, if proved, be a reprisal.
(sec.12-ssec.2) The person may make a disclosure under section 17 in relation to the information to a proper authority.
(sec.12-ssec.3) For subsection (1) , a person has information about the conduct of another person or another matter if— the person honestly believes on reasonable grounds that the information tends to show the conduct or other matter; or the information tends to show the conduct or other matter, regardless of whether the person honestly believes the information tends to show the conduct or other matter.
(a) a substantial and specific danger to the health or safety of a person with a disability; or
(b) the commission of an offence against a provision mentioned in schedule 2 , if the commission of the offence is or would be a substantial and specific danger to the environment; or
(c) a contravention of a condition imposed under a provision mentioned in schedule 2 , if the contravention is or would be a substantial and specific danger to the environment; or
(d) the conduct of another person that could, if proved, be a reprisal.
(a) the person honestly believes on reasonable grounds that the information tends to show the conduct or other matter; or
(b) the information tends to show the conduct or other matter, regardless of whether the person honestly believes
This is an opening excerpt, not the complete document.