Competition and Consumer Act 2010
152BCBRestrictions on access determinations
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 152BCB
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
152BCB Restrictions on access determinations
(1) The Commission must not make an access determination that would have any of the following effects:
(a) preventing a service provider who already has access to the declared service from obtaining a sufficient amount of the service to be able to meet the service provider’s reasonably anticipated requirements, measured at the time when the access seeker made a request in relation to the service under section 152AR or 152AXB;
(b) preventing a carrier or carriage service provider from obtaining a sufficient amount of the service to be able to meet the carrier’s or provider’s reasonably anticipated requirements, measured at the time when the access seeker made a request in relation to the service under section 152AR or 152AXB;
(c) preventing a person from obtaining, by the exercise of a pre‑determination right, a sufficient level of access to the declared service to be able to meet the person’s actual requirements;
(d) depriving any person of a protected contractual right;
(e) resulting in an access seeker becoming the owner (or one of the owners) of any part of a facility without the consent of the owner of the facility;
(f) requiring a person (other than an access seeker) to bear an unreasonable amount of the costs of:
(i) extending or enhancing the capability of a facility; or
(ii) maintaining extensions to or enhancements of the capability of a facility;
(g) requiring a carrier or carriage service provider to provide an access seeker with access to a declared service if there are reasonable grounds to believe that:
(i) the access seeker would fail, to a material extent, to comply with the terms and conditions on which the carrier or provider provides, or is reasonably likely to provide, that access; or
(ii) the access seeker would fail, in connection with that access, to protect the integrity of a telecommunications network or to protect the safety of individuals working on, or using services supplied by means of, a telecommunications network or a facility.
(2) Examples of grounds for believing as mentioned in subparagraph (1)(g)(i) include:
(a) evidence that the access seeker is not creditworthy; and
(b) repeated failures by the access seeker to comply with the terms and conditions on which the same or similar access has been provided (whether or not by the carrier or carriage service provider).
(3) The Commission must not make an access determination that is inconsistent with any of the standard access obligations that are, or will be, applicable to a carrier or carriage service provider.
(3A) If a final migration plan is in force and imposes obligations or prohibitions on a designated Telstra successor company, the Commission must not make an access determination that would have the effect of requiring the designated Telstra successor company to engage in conduct in connection with matters covered by the final migration plan.