Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Zoe

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Lawyers in Sydney
Lawyers in Melbourne
Lawyers in Brisbane
Lawyers in Perth
Family lawyers
Employment lawyers
Criminal lawyers
Wills and estates lawyers
Find a lawyer

Company

Pricing
API
Privacy
Terms
Support
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Commonwealth
New South Wales
Queensland
Victoria
Western Australia
South Australia
Tasmania
Australian Capital Territory
Northern Territory

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.

Vaughan-Taylor v David Mitchell-Melcann Pty Ltd [1998] NSWLEC 133 | Case summary | Zoe

Zoe

Legislation Cases Guides Find a lawyer Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Ask Zoe →

Home/Cases/[1998] NSWLEC 133

NSWNSWLEC

Vaughan-Taylor v David Mitchell-Melcann Pty Ltd

[1998] NSWLEC 133

Land and Environment Court (NSW)|1992-12-03|Before: Sheahan J, Council Mr P

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Land and Environment Court (NSW)

Decision date

1992-12-03

Before

Sheahan J, Council Mr P

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Judgment (4 paragraphs)

The applicant to pay the costs of the First and Third respondents.

[32]

All the exhibits before the Court on 24 July 1998 were returned when judgment was delivered, but several documents were tendered (some again) during the hearing on 17 November 1998.

[33]

Exhibits S6, S7 and A1 may now be returned to Counsel for Sericott

DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

Vaughan-Taylor

Respondent/Defendant:

David Mitchell-Melcann Pty Ltd

Cases Cited (1)

CITATION : Sericott Pty Limited v. Snowy River Shire Council [1998] NSWLEC 133 40171 APPLICANT Sericott Pty Ltd

Cited By (2)

Fokas v Kogarah RSL Club Ltd

Fokas v Stack & Ors