Secure Funding Pty Ltd v Don 1 Enterprises Pty Ltd [2026] QSC 60

1. The application filed 13 May 2025 is dismissed.
2. The third defendant shall pay the plaintiff's costs of and incidental to the application filed 13 May 2025 to be assessed on the standard basis.

[14] Plaintiff/Respondent's Outline of Argument [25], [27].

[15] WT Lamb & Son v Rider [1948] All ER 402.

[25] [1948] 2 All ER 11.

[49] [1999] 2 Qd R 318.

[64] Remely v Vandenberg & Ors [2010] QCA 214 at [13].

[65] Remely v O'Shea & Ors (No 3) [2009] QSC 110 at [21].

[66] Butterworths, looseleaf service, p 21,055 [r 803.1].

[67] [1886] 18 LRI 170.

[69] [1897] 1 IR 556.

[73] (2007) 230 CLR 89 at [135].

[74] Herzfeld and Prince, Interpretation, 3rd ed p 185.

[75] Herzfeld and Prince, Interpretation, 3rd ed p 186.

[76] Citigroup Pty Ltd v Jackman [2018] VSC 545, [28]; Attorney-General v Kowalski (No 5) [2017] SASC 120, [38], Barrak v Barrak [2005] Fam CA 906, [35]-[50], Knight v Ellington [2019] Fam CA 488, [116].

[80] Stage Club Ltd v Millers Hotels Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 71; (1981) 150 CLR 535 at 544, 564.

[81] Handford, Limitation of Actions, Thomson Reuters, 5th edition at 288.

[82] Busch v Stevens [1963] 1 QB 1, 6.

[83] ED &F Man (Sugar) Ltd v Haryanto [1996] TLR 491, 492 per Leggatt LJ citing Williams v Jones [1845] EngR 394; (1845) 13 M&W 628, 633.

[84] Williams v Jones [1845] EngR 394; (1845) 13 M&W 628, 633.

[85] ED &F Man (Sugar) Ltd v Haryanto [1996] TLR 491 at 492.

[86] University of Wollongong v Metwally (No. 2) [1985] HCA 28; (1985) 59 ALJR 481, 482_; State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd_ (1982) 150 CLR 29, 38_._