© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2010] VCAT 1364
Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal
2010-08-13
Original judgment source is linked above.
To that part of the land at 410 Derrimut Road, Tarneit affected by the proposed use and development. The permit will allow:
in accordance with the endorsed plans provided for and subject to the permit conditions set out in the Appendix to this decision.
Once this plan is submitted to and approved by the Responsible Authority, the works detailed by the plan must be carried out in accordance with the plan to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.
Note: The relevant construction and associated demolition works must comply with the requirements specified in the Environmental Protection Authority's Noise Control Guidelines.
No External PA System - Where the site abuts a sensitive area
The Responsible Authority may extend the periods referred to if a request is made in writing before the permit expires, or within three (3) months afterwards.
NOTE: In the event that this permit expires or the subject land is proposed to be used or developed for the purposes different from those for which this permit is granted, there is no guarantee that a new permit will be granted. If a new permit is granted then the permit conditions may vary from those included on this permit having regard to changes that might occur to circumstances, the Planning Scheme or policy.
NOTE: Any new or modified crossovers require separate approval from Council's Engineering Services Department.
NOTE: Except where no permit is required under the provisions of Clause 52.05 of the Wyndham Planning Scheme, no advertising signs may be constructed or displayed without a permit.
NOTE: This permit is issued pursuant to the provisions of the Wyndham Planning Scheme and does not relieve the permit holder of the necessity to obtain a building permit pursuant to the Building Act 1993 prior to commencement of any construction or works on any part of the site.
If further information is required in relation to Melbourne Water's permit conditions shown above, please contact Melbourne Water on telephone 9235 2517, quoting Melbourne Water's reference 176269.
The property is adjacent to an overland flow path of storm water runoff. The applicable flood level for the property is 300mm below the adjacent top of bank.
FOOTNOTE: Separate approval must be obtained from Councils' Environmental Health Department and any other relevant authority prior to the commencement of the use and/or development.
FOOTNOTE: All food premises as defined by the Food Act 1984 must register with Council's Environmental Health Unit prior to commencing operation.
[1] The Council's "failure to decide in the statutory period" being the equivalent of a refusal.
[2] See paragraph 39 of the Berettas decision in particular.
[3] Also see CK & Sons Pty Ltd v Bayside CC [2010] VCAT 505 and De Group Pty Ltd v Wyndham CC [2010] VCAT 607.
[4] I refer here in particular to the third to last bullet point at page 32 of Ms Thomas' written evidence, which reads as follows - "At the Statistical Local Area (SLA) level, with Wyndham North (where the Tavern is situated) being ranked 108 out of the 104 SLAs in the state, Wyndham West had 124 and Wyndham South had 196. This implies that Wyndham North SLA is less disadvantaged than more than half of Victoria's SLAs".
[5] I acknowledge that in the Maddocks' written submission this parking dispensation figure is slightly higher, but as Maddocks provided no particular justification for this slightly higher figure, I prefer the evidence of Mr Walsh on this issue.
[6] In Ms Thomas' planning report, she estimates the height of these fences to be 2.4 metres. Certainly my site inspection confirm that they are unusually high.
Sayers Property Holdings Pty Ltd
Wyndham CC [2010] VCAT 1364
Prizac Investments Pty Ltd & Ors v Maribyrnong CC & Ors [2009] VCAT 2616,
CK & Sons Pty Ltd v Bayside CC [2010] VCAT 505, and
De Group Pty Ltd v Wyndham CC [2010] VCAT 607
Cedar Woods Properties Limited v Wyndham CC [2010] VCAT 446.