Prothonotary v Comeskey [2018] NSWCA 18 | Case summary

Catchwords

Ch 4 Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW), ss 16, 22, 261, 262, 264(1), 297 Trans-Tasman Mutual Recognition Act 1997 (Cth), ss 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 33Pt 3 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 17.3(2) Cases Cited: A Solicitor v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales (2004) 216 CLR 253[2004] HCA 1 In re Davis (1948) 48 SR (NSW) 33 In re Davis (1947) 75 CLR 409[1947] HCA 53 In re Petroulias [2005] 1 Qd R 643[2004] QCA 261 NSW Bar Association v Cummins (2001) 52 NSWLR 279Ex parte Tkacz (2006) 206 FLR 171[2006] WASC 315 Re VeronEx parte Law Society of New South Wales (1966) 84 WN (Pt 1) (NSW) 136 Rich v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2004) 220 CLR 129[2004] HCA 42 Scott v Law Society of Tasmania [2009] TASSC 12 Ziems v The Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (1957) 97 CLR 279

: "West" changed to "Western". Footnote 9: "In re Davis (1947) 48 SR (NSW) 33" changed to "In re Davis (1948) 48 SR (NSW) 33". DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 19 February 2018

Prothonotary v Comeskey

At a glance

Court

Decision date

Before

Catchwords

Source

Catchwords

Judgment (2 paragraphs)

Parties

Legislation Cited (7)

Cases Cited (18)

Cited By (7)