NSWNSWCA
Prothonotary v Comeskey
[2018] NSWCA 18
Court of Appeal (NSW)|2017-05-19|Before: Basten JA, Macfarlan JA, Simpson JA
View original sourceAt a glance
Source factsCourt
Court of Appeal (NSW)
Decision date
2017-05-19
Before
Basten JA, Macfarlan JA, Simpson JA
Catchwords
- Ch 4 Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW), ss 16, 22, 261, 262, 264(1), 297 Trans-Tasman Mutual Recognition Act 1997 (Cth), ss 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 33
- Pt 3 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 17.3(2) Cases Cited: A Solicitor v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales (2004) 216 CLR 253
- [2004] HCA 1 In re Davis (1948) 48 SR (NSW) 33 In re Davis (1947) 75 CLR 409
- [1947] HCA 53 In re Petroulias [2005] 1 Qd R 643
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Catchwords
Ch 4
Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW), ss 16, 22, 261, 262, 264(1), 297
Trans-Tasman Mutual Recognition Act 1997 (Cth), ss 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 33Pt 3
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 17.3(2)
Cases Cited: A Solicitor v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales (2004) 216 CLR 253[2004] HCA 1
In re Davis (1948) 48 SR (NSW) 33
In re Davis (1947) 75 CLR 409[1947] HCA 53
In re Petroulias [2005] 1 Qd R 643[2004] QCA 261
NSW Bar Association v Cummins (2001) 52 NSWLR 279Ex parte Tkacz (2006) 206 FLR 171[2006] WASC 315
Re VeronEx parte Law Society of New South Wales (1966) 84 WN (Pt 1) (NSW) 136
Rich v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2004) 220 CLR 129[2004] HCA 42
Scott v Law Society of Tasmania [2009] TASSC 12
Ziems v The Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (1957) 97 CLR 279
Judgment (2 paragraphs)
[2]