[3] Refer to the Schedule to Clause 72.04.

Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal|2026-03-18

For the reasons given above, the decisions of the responsible authority are affirmed. The subdivision permit must not be amended, and no permit is granted for the childcare centre.

[1] The submissions and evidence of the parties, any supporting exhibits given at the hearing and the statements of grounds filed have all been considered in the determination of the proceeding. In accordance with the practice of the Tribunal, not all of this material will be cited or referred to in these reasons.

[2] It is noted that neither of these referral authorities are parties to the proceedings and that the Head, Transport for Victoria does not object to both proposals because access to Donnybrook Road will remain temporary. It should also be noted that other referral authorities for the subdivision amendment including the APA Group, AusNet Services, AusNet Transmission and Yarra Valley Water all offered no objections with some subject to conditions.

[3] Refer to the Schedule to Clause 72.04.

[4] TAG-Doreen Pty Ltd v Whittlesea CC [2016] VCAT 1705 which cited Fabcot Pty Ltd v Whittlesea CC [2014] VCAT 600 (Deputy President Gibson and Member Glynn). See also The Ivanhoe Grammar School v Banyule CC [2009] VCAT 34 at [23] and Casey Gardens Developments Pty Ltd v Casey CC [2009] VCAT 2489 [10]-[11].

[5] Paragraph 6.2 of applicant's submission.

Environment Act 1987

Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998

Oreana North Pty Ltd v Whittlesea CC [2026] VCAT 178 (18 March 2026)

Oreana North Pty Ltd v Whittlesea CC [2026] VCAT 178

At a glance

Court

Decision date

Source

Judgment (6 paragraphs)

Parties

Legislation Cited (2)

Cases Cited (1)

Oreana North Pty Ltd v Whittlesea CC [2026] VCAT 178 (18 March 2026)