© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2020] FCA 1137
Federal Court of Australia
2020-08-07
Mr P, Burley J
Original judgment source is linked above.
BURLEY J: 1 In these proceedings I have delivered two earlier judgments: Kessly v Beadle as Trustee of the Bankrupt Estate of Evangelina Francisca Kessly [2020] FCA 607 was published on 8 May 2020, and Kessly v Beadle as Trustee of the Bankrupt Estate of Evangelina Francisca Kessly (No 2) [2020] FCA 975 was published on 10 July 2020. These reasons use the definitions in those judgments. 2 In order 5 made on 10 July 2020 I directed that the parties file evidence and submissions in relation to the residual question of the amount of BK's costs in these proceedings, which the Court would assess on the papers. BK and Mrs Kessly have filed evidence and submissions in accordance with those directions. 3 The total amount of costs sought by BK is $31,809.59, including counsel fees and printing costs but excluding work performed by BK or its employees. That amount is supported by the affidavit of Werrdan Reginald Khoury sworn on 17 July 2020, which annexes the tax invoices issued by counsel. 4 Having regard to the submissions advanced, in my view the amount sought by BK should be discounted by 15 per cent to take into account the likely rebate for GST, and to reduce the amount sought for photocopying in accordance with the National Guide to Discretionary Items in Bills of Costs. 5 Accordingly, I will order that Mrs Kessly pay BK's costs assessed in a lump sum amount of $27,038.15. I certify that the preceding five (5) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Justice Burley.
Kessly
Beadle as Trustee of the Bankrupt Estate of Evangelina Francisca Kessly