VICVSCA
Kassionis v The Magistrates' Court of Victoria & Hanley [2002] VSCA 73
[2002] VSCA 73
Court of Appeal (Vic)|2002-05-17|Before: BATT and EAMES, JJ.A.
View original sourceAt a glance
Source factsCourt
Court of Appeal (Vic)
Decision date
2002-05-17
Before
BATT and EAMES, JJ.A.
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Judgment (9 paragraphs)
[1]
the applicant, or appellant as I have been calling him. The appellant has invoked Order 56 of Chapter I of the Rules on a matter which failed completely before the primary judge, and this Court has taken the view that leave has not been shown to be appropriate. Costs this case, we think, should be payable, although it originates out of criminal charges, and they should follow the event.
[2]
1. The application for leave to appeal made orally this day is refused with costs.
[3]
2. The application for a stay made by summons filed 28 March 2002 is refused.
[4]