//
© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2016] FCA 1001
Federal Court of Australia
2016-08-19
Reeves J
Original judgment source is linked above.
REEVES J: 1 The primary object of any litigant when commencing proceedings in a court of law is to obtain relief. In this case Asden Developments Pty Ltd (in liquidation) sought two forms of relief: a declaration under s 1317E(1)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and an order for compensation under s 1317H. 2 It has conceded that, in the circumstances, s 1317E(4) prevents it from seeking the former and it has failed to establish its case for the latter. 3 Along the way it has had a measure of success on one component of its breach of duty claim, namely that Mr Dinoris breached his duty under s 180 by failing to make enquiries of Ms Nichols about the transfer of the funds. However, it failed on all other aspects, including the other component of its breach of duty claim. 4 In all the circumstances, I do not therefore consider that the success it has had justifies a departure from the usual rule that costs should follow the event. 5 Accordingly, I order that Asden Developments Pty Ltd (in liquidation) pay Mr Dinoris and Mr Combis' costs of this proceeding. I certify that the preceding five (5) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Reeves.
Asden Developments Pty Ltd (in liq)
Dinoris