This law creates a civil-style, time-limited preventive detention and prohibited-contact regime letting authorised police detain people briefly to prevent an imminent terrorist act or preserve recent terror‑related evidence. It centralises swift police powers (custody, searches, monitored communications) with judicial review and criminal penalties for misuse, affects detained individuals, lawyers, interpreters and police operations, and shifts some decision weight from criminal processes to police/Supreme Court oversight. The regime sunsets on 31 December 2030.
This Act creates a civil preventative detention regime that authorises police-led short-term detention and tightly controlled contact for people suspected, on specified grounds, of being connected to imminent terrorist activity or to the preservation of evidence of recent terrorist activity. The operational gatekeepers are authorised police officers and, in many cases, the Supreme Court. Key statutory mechanisms are:
Applications by authorised police officers to the Supreme Court or, in urgent cases, to a senior police officer for a preventative detention order (s 5, s 6). The statutory triggers are either reasonable grounds to suspect imminent involvement in a terrorist act, or satisfaction that detention is reasonably necessary to preserve evidence of a terrorist act that occurred within the last 28 days (s 5(1)(a)-(b); s 7(1)).
Preventative detention orders authorise a person to be taken into custody and detained for a specified period that generally cannot exceed 14 days when made by the Supreme Court, subject to limits for orders made by senior police officers (s 8(1)-(3); s 9).
Prohibited contact orders may be sought alongside or after a preventative detention order to restrict who the detainee may contact while in custody (ss 14-15).
Operational powers for police while an order is in effect include the power to take a person into custody (s 18), enter premises to find or arrest the person (s 21), search and strip-search the person in specific circumstances (s 22), and take identification material with specified safeguards (s 40-41).
Procedural and rights safeguards include telling the detainee why they are detained and the period (s 26-29), entitlement to contact an Ombudsman (s 33) and a lawyer for limited purposes (s 34), monitored contact (s 35), special contact rules for persons under 18 or incapable of managing affairs (s 36), and requirements for a nominated senior police officer to oversee compliance (s 18(7)-(10)).
Current sections
Direct links to the current provisions in Terrorism (Preventative Detention) Act 2005.
(b) a law of another State or of a Territory, or particular provisions of a law of another State or of a Territory, that –
(i) corresponds or correspond to this Act; or
(ii) is or are declared by the regulations to correspond to this Act;
Director of Corrective Services has the same meaning as in the Corrections Act 1997 ;
identification material, in relation to a person, means samples taken from a part of the person's body from which a DNA profile may be derived, prints of the person's hands, fingers, feet or toes, recordings of the person's voice, samples of the person's handwriting or photographs (including video recordings) of the person;
interim preventative detention order means an interim preventative detention order made by the Supreme Court under section 7 ;
prescribed authority has the same meaning as in Division 3 of Part III of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979 of the Commonwealth;
preventative detention order means an order made under section 7 , as varied under section 16 or 17 , and includes an interim preventative detention order;
vehicle means any thing capable of transporting people or things by air, road, rail or water, regardless of how the thing is moved or propelled.
(2) The Commissioner of Police may appoint in writing police officers, or a class or classes of police officers, to be authorised police officers for the purpose of making applications under sections 5 , 15 and 17 .
(3) A note in the text of this Act does not form part of this Act.
(1) An authorised police officer (the "applicant") may apply to the Supreme Court or, subject to subsection (3) , to a senior police officer for a preventative detention order in relation to a person (the "subject") if –
(B) possesses or has under his or her control (whether solely or jointly with any other person) a thing that is connected with the preparation for, or the engagement of a person in, a terrorist act; or
(C) has done an act in preparation for, or planning, a terrorist act; and
(ii) making the order would substantially assist in preventing a terrorist act occurring; and
(iii) detaining the subject for the period for which the applicant is seeking to have him or her detained under the order is reasonably necessary for the purpose referred to in subparagraph (ii) ; or
(b) the applicant is satisfied that –
(i) a terrorist act has occurred within the last 28 days; and
(iii) detaining the subject for the period for which the applicant is seeking to have him or her detained under the order is reasonably necessary for the purpose referred to in subparagraph (ii) .
(i) the true name of the person in relation to whom the preventative detention order is sought (the subject); or
(ii) if, after reasonable inquiries have been made, the subject's true name is not known but an alias is known for the subject, the subject's alias; or
(iii) if, after reasonable inquiries have been made, the subject's true name is not known and no alias is known for the subject, a description sufficient to identify the subject; and
(b) set out the facts and other grounds on which the applicant considers that the preventative detention order should be made; and
(a) a preventative detention order is made in relation to a person on the basis of assisting in preventing a terrorist act occurring within a particular period; and
(b) the person is taken into custody under the order; and
(c) an application is made for another preventative detention order in relation to the person on the basis of assisting in preventing a different terrorist act occurring within that period –
the application must also identify the information on which the application is based that became available only after the preventative detention order referred to in paragraph (a) was made.
(3) If –
(a) an order for a person’s detention is made under a corresponding preventative detention law on the basis of assisting in preventing a terrorist act occurring within a particular period; and
(b) the person is taken into custody under that order; and
(c) an application is made for a preventative detention order in relation to the person on the basis of assisting in preventing a different terrorist act occurring within that period –
the application must also identify the information on which the application is based that became available only after the order referred to in paragraph (a) was made.
| Note: Section 45 creates an offence for providing false or misleading information or documents in connection with an application to a senior police officer. |
(4A) [Section 6 Subsection (4A) inserted by No. 36 of 2015, s. 7, Applied:13 Oct 2015] If the application is made orally, the information given by the applicant to the Supreme Court or relevant senior police officer in connection with the application must be verified or given on oath or affirmation unless the Court or officer is satisfied that in the circumstances it is not practical to administer an oath or affirmation to the applicant.
(5) An application to a senior police officer may be made without notice of it being given to the person in relation to whom a preventative detention order is being sought.
(6) An application to the Supreme Court may only be made without notice of it being given to the person in relation to whom a preventative detention order is being sought if that person is not then being detained under –
(a) a preventative detention order made by a senior police officer; or
(b) an order for the person's detention made under a corresponding preventative detention law.
(a) ensure that there is an audio recording or audio-visual recording of the application; or
(b) as soon as practicable after the order is made, make a written record of the application, inclusive of the information given by the applicant in support of the application.
7
Preventative detention orders
7 Preventative detention orders
(1) The Supreme Court or the senior police officer may, on an application under section 5 , make a preventative detention order in relation to a person if –
(B) possesses or has under his or her control (whether solely or jointly with any other person) a thing that is connected with the preparation for, or the engagement of a person in, a terrorist act; or
(C) has done an act in preparation for, or in planning, a terrorist act; and
(ii) making the order would substantially assist in preventing a terrorist act occurring; and
(iii) detaining the person for the period for which he or she is to be detained under the order is reasonably necessary for the purpose referred to in subparagraph (ii) ; or
(b) satisfied on reasonable grounds that –
(i) a terrorist act has occurred within the last 28 days; and
(iii) detaining the person for the period for which he or she is to be detained under the order is reasonably necessary for the purpose referred to in subparagraph (ii) .
(b) that is expected to occur, in any event, at some time in the next 14 days.
(3) The Supreme Court or the senior police officer may refuse to make a preventative detention order unless the authorised police officer applying for it gives the Court or the officer (as the case requires) any further information that it, he or she requests concerning the grounds on which the order is sought.
(4) If the application to the Supreme Court is made without notice of it being given to the person in relation to whom a preventative detention order is being sought, the Supreme Court may, if in its opinion it is desirable to do so, make an interim preventative detention order pending the hearing and final determination of the application.
| Note: The maximum period during which a person may be detained under an interim order is 48 hours or until the final determination of the application, whichever is the later: see section 9(3) . |
(5) If the Supreme Court makes an interim preventative detention order, it must –
(a) specify a day on which, and time at which, the hearing of the application is to be resumed; and
(b) direct the applicant to cause notice of the resumed hearing to be given to –
(i) the person in relation to whom the interim order is made; and
(ii) if the applicant is aware of the identity of a lawyer who acts for that person in relation to any matter, that lawyer.
(6) On a resumed hearing referred to in subsection (5) , the person in relation to whom the interim order is made is entitled to appear and give evidence, call witnesses, examine and cross-examine witnesses, adduce material and make submissions. However, his or her absence does not prevent the Supreme Court from finally determining the application.
(7) An interim preventative detention order that, but for this subsection, would cease to have effect before the application is finally determined, continues to have effect, subject to section 9(2) , until the application is finally determined.
(8) On finally determining an application following the making of an interim preventative detention order, the Supreme Court may by order –
(a) confirm the order without variation or vary the period specified in the order as the period during which the person in relation to whom it is made may be detained under it; or
| Note: The period of detention in the confirmed order may be extended, or further extended, under section 11 . |
(b) revoke the order if not satisfied as mentioned in subsection (1) .
(9) If the person in relation to whom the interim preventative detention order is made is being detained in a prison, the applicant for that order must cause a copy of any order made under subsection (8) to be given to the Director of Corrective Services as soon as practicable after it is made.
(10) On the hearing by the Supreme Court of an application under section 5 (including a resumed hearing referred to in subsection (5) of this section) –
(a) the person in relation to whom a preventative detention order is being sought (including a person in relation to whom an interim preventative detention order or a preventative detention order made by a senior police officer is in force) is entitled to appear and give evidence, call witnesses, examine and cross-examine witnesses, adduce material and make submissions; but
(b) the absence of that person does not prevent the Supreme Court from determining, or finally determining, the application.
(11) If, on an application by an authorised police officer for the making of a preventative detention order in relation to a person who is being detained under a preventative detention order made or purportedly made by a senior police officer (the "police order"), the Supreme Court is satisfied that the making or purported making of the police order was so unreasonable that no senior police officer acting reasonably could have made that order, the Supreme Court may –
(a) declare the police order to be void from its beginning; and
(b) determine that the State should compensate the person, as assessed by the Supreme Court, in respect of any loss sustained or damage incurred by the person as a direct and reasonable consequence of his or her detention under the police order.
(a) taken into custody (unless he or she is already being detained under a preventative detention order, or an order for his or her detention made under a corresponding preventative detention law, that is in force or was in force immediately before the making of the new order); and
(ii) if, after reasonable inquiries have been made, the subject's true name is not known but an alias is known for the subject, the subject's alias; or
(iii) if, after reasonable inquiries have been made, the subject's true name is not known and no alias is known for the subject, a description sufficient to identify the subject; and
the order may provide that the period each day for which the subject is entitled to have contact with another person under section 36(2) is the period of more than 2 hours that is specified in the order.
9
Duration of preventative detention orders
9 Duration of preventative detention orders
(1) The maximum period that may be specified in a preventative detention order made by a senior police officer as the period during which a person may be detained under the order is 24 hours.
(2) Subject to subsection (3) , the maximum period (including that period, as extended, or further extended, under section 11 ) that may be specified in a preventative detention order made by the Supreme Court as the period during which a person may be detained under the order is 14 days less any period during which the person is actually detained under –
(a) a preventative detention order made by a senior police officer; or
(b) an order for the person's detention made under a corresponding preventative detention law –
on the same basis.
(3) The maximum period that may be specified in an interim preventative detention order made by the Supreme Court as the period during which a person may be detained under the order is 48 hours.
(4) Despite the period of detention specified in a preventative detention order made by a senior police officer, as soon as practicable after the person in relation to whom the order is made is first taken into custody or detained under the order, an application for a preventative detention order in relation to the person must be made to the Supreme Court.
(5) To avoid doubt, for the purposes of subsection (2) orders are made on the same basis if –
(a) in the case of orders made on the basis of preventing a terrorist act from occurring, they relate to the same terrorist act occurring within the same period; and
(b) in the case of orders made on the basis of preserving evidence of, or relating to, a terrorist act, they relate to the same terrorist act.
10
When order starts and ceases to have effect
10 When order starts and ceases to have effect
(1) A preventative detention order in relation to a person starts to have effect –
(a) if the preventative detention order so provides, on an order for the person's detention made under a corresponding preventative detention law ceasing to have effect; or
(b) in any other case, when it is made.
| Note: When the order starts to have effect it authorises the person to be taken into custody, if necessary (see section 8(1)(a) ). The period for which the person may be detained under the order only starts to run when the person is first taken into custody or detained under the order ( section 8(1)(b) ). |
(2) A preventative detention order in relation to a person under which the person is required to be taken into custody ceases to have effect at the end of the period of 48 hours after the order is made if the person has not been taken into custody under the order within that period.
(3) If a preventative detention order does not cease to have effect under subsection (2) , it ceases to have effect when whichever of the following first occurs:
(a) the end of –
(i) the period specified in the order as the period during which the person may be detained under the order; or
(ii) if that period is extended or further extended under section 11 , that period as extended or further extended;
(b) if the order was made by a senior police officer, a preventative detention order is made by the Supreme Court in relation to the same person;
(c) the revocation of the order under section 7 , 16 or 17 .
| Note: The order does not cease to have effect merely because the person is released from detention under the order. |
11
Extension of preventative detention order
11 Extension of preventative detention order
(1) If –
(a) a preventative detention order is made by the Supreme Court in relation to a person on the final determination of an application under section 5 ; and
(b) the order is in force in relation to the person –
an authorised police officer may apply to the Supreme Court for an extension, or a further extension, of the period for which the order is to be in force in relation to the person.
(i) the true name of the person in relation to whom the extension is sought; or
(ii) if, after reasonable inquiries have been made, the true name of the person in relation to whom the extension is sought is not known but an alias is known for the person, the person's alias; or
(iii) if, after reasonable inquiries have been made, the true name of the person in relation to whom the extension is sought is not known and no alias is known for the person, a description sufficient to identify the person; and
(b) set out the facts and other grounds on which the applicant considers that the extension, or further extension, is reasonably necessary for the purpose for which the order was made; and
(c) set out the outcomes and particulars of all previous applications for extensions, or further extensions, of the order.
(4) The applicant must cause notice of the application to be given to the person in relation to whom the preventative detention order is in force.
(5) The person in relation to whom the preventative detention order is in force is entitled to appear on the hearing and give evidence, call witnesses, examine and cross-examine witnesses, adduce material and make submissions. However, his or her absence does not prevent the Supreme Court from determining the application.
(6) The Supreme Court may, by order, extend or further extend the period for which the order is to be in force in relation to the person if it is satisfied that detaining the person under the order for the period as extended, or further extended, is reasonably necessary for the purpose for which the order was made.
(7) The order must be in writing.
(8) The extension, or further extension, must not result in the preventative detention order specifying a period in excess of the maximum period permissible under section 9(2) .
(9) If the person in relation to whom the order is in force is being detained in a prison and the Supreme Court makes an order under subsection (6) that extends, or further extends, the period for which the order is to be in force, the applicant must cause a copy of the order under that subsection to be given to the Director of Corrective Services as soon as practicable after it is made.
12
No preventative detention order in relation to person under 16 years of age
12 No preventative detention order in relation to person under 16 years of age
(1) A preventative detention order cannot be applied for, or made, in relation to a person who is under 16 years of age.
| Note: See also section 36 and section 40(4) to (10) for the special rules for people who are under 18 years of age. |
(2) If –
(a) a person is being detained under a preventative detention order or a purported preventative detention order; and
(b) the police officer who is detaining the person is satisfied on reasonable grounds that the person is under 16 years of age –
the police officer must release the person or arrange in writing for his or her release, as soon as practicable, from detention under the order or purported order.
13
Restrictions on multiple preventative detention orders
13 Restrictions on multiple preventative detention orders
(1) If –
(a) a preventative detention order is made in relation to a person on the basis of assisting in preventing a terrorist act occurring within a particular period; and
(b) the person is being detained under that order –
another preventative detention order cannot be applied for, or made, under this Part in relation to the person on the basis of assisting in preventing a different terrorist act occurring within that period unless the application, or the order, is based on information that became available only after the preventative detention order referred to in paragraph (a) was made.
(2) If –
(a) an order for a person's detention is made under a corresponding preventative detention law on the basis of assisting in preventing a terrorist act occurring within a particular period; and
(b) the person is being detained under that order –
a preventative detention order cannot be applied for to, or made by, a senior police officer under this Part in relation to the person on the basis of assisting in preventing the same terrorist act occurring within that period.
(3) If –
(a) an order for a person’s detention is made under a corresponding preventative detention law on the basis of assisting in preventing a terrorist act occurring within a particular period; and
(b) the person is being detained under that order –
a preventative detention order cannot be applied for, or made, under this Part in relation to the person on the basis of assisting in preventing a different terrorist act occurring within that period unless the application, or the order, is based on information that became available only after the order referred to in paragraph (a) was made.
(4) If –
(a) an order for a person’s detention is made under a corresponding preventative detention law on the basis of preserving evidence of, or relating to, a terrorist act; and
(b) the person is being detained under that order –
a preventative detention order cannot be applied for to, or made by, a senior police officer under this Part in relation to the person on the basis of preserving evidence of, or relating to, the same terrorist act.
14
Prohibited contact order (person in relation to whom preventative detention order is being sought)
14 Prohibited contact order (person in relation to whom preventative detention order is being sought)
(1) An authorised police officer who applies for a preventative detention order in relation to a person (the "subject") may also apply for a prohibited contact order under this section in relation to the subject's detention under the preventative detention order.
(2) The application must set out –
(a) the terms of the order sought; and
(b) the facts and other grounds on which the applicant considers that the order should be made.
| Note: Section 45 creates an offence for providing false or misleading information or documents in connection with an application to a senior police officer. |
(3A) [Section 14 Subsection (3A) inserted by No. 36 of 2015, s. 11, Applied:13 Oct 2015] If the application is made orally, the information given by the applicant to the Supreme Court or relevant senior police officer in connection with the application must be verified or given on oath or affirmation unless the Court or officer is satisfied that in the circumstances it is not practical to administer an oath or affirmation to the applicant.
(4) An application to the Supreme Court may only be made without notice of it being given to the person in relation to whom a prohibited contact order is being sought if that person is not then being detained under –
(a) a preventative detention order made by a senior police officer; or
(b) an order for the person's detention made under a corresponding preventative detention law.
(5) If the application to the Supreme Court is made without notice of it being given to the person in relation to whom the prohibited contact order is being sought and the order is being sought in conjunction with an application for a preventative detention order under section 5 , the Court may, if in its opinion it is desirable to do so, make an interim prohibited contact order pending the hearing and final determination of the application at the resumed hearing of the application for the preventative detention order.
(6) The person in relation to whose detention an application for a prohibited contact order is made to the Supreme Court under this section is entitled to be given notice of the application and to appear and give evidence, call witnesses, examine and cross-examine witnesses, adduce material and make submissions in relation to it. However, his or her absence does not prevent the Supreme Court from determining the application.
(7) If the Supreme Court or the senior police officer, as the case requires –
(a) makes the preventative detention order; and
(b) is satisfied on reasonable grounds that making the prohibited contact order will assist in achieving the purpose of the preventative detention order –
the Court or officer may make a prohibited contact order under this section that the subject is not, while being detained under the preventative detention order, to contact any person specified in the prohibited contact order.
(8) The prohibited contact order must be in writing.
(a) ensure that there is an audio recording or audio-visual recording of the application; or
(b) as soon as practicable after the order is made, make a written record of the application, inclusive of the information given by the applicant in support of the application.
15
Prohibited contact order (person in relation to whom preventative detention order is already in force)
15 Prohibited contact order (person in relation to whom preventative detention order is already in force)
(1) If a preventative detention order is in force in relation to a person (the "subject"), an authorised police officer may apply to the Supreme Court or, if the preventative detention order was made by a senior police officer, to a senior police officer for a prohibited contact order under this section in relation to the subject's detention under the preventative detention order.
(2) The application must set out –
(a) the terms of the order sought; and
(b) the facts and other grounds on which the applicant considers that the order should be made.
| Note: Section 45 creates an offence for providing false or misleading information or documents in connection with an application to a senior police officer. |
(3A) [Section 15 Subsection (3A) inserted by No. 36 of 2015, s. 12, Applied:13 Oct 2015] If the application is made orally, the information given by the applicant to the Supreme Court or relevant senior police officer in connection with the application must be verified or given on oath or affirmation unless the Court or officer is satisfied that in the circumstances it is not practical to administer an oath or affirmation to the applicant.
(4) The person in relation to whose detention under a preventative detention order an application for a prohibited contact order is made to the Supreme Court under this section is entitled to be given notice of the application and to appear and give evidence, call witnesses, examine and cross-examine witnesses, adduce material and make submissions in relation to it. However, his or her absence does not prevent the Supreme Court from determining the application.
(5) If the Supreme Court or the senior police officer (as the case requires) is satisfied on reasonable grounds that making the prohibited contact order will assist in achieving the purpose for which the preventative detention order was made, the Court or officer may make a prohibited contact order under this section that the subject is not, while being detained under the preventative detention order, to contact any person specified in the prohibited contact order.
(6) The prohibited contact order must be in writing.
(a) ensure that there is an audio recording or audio-visual recording of the application; or
(b) as soon as practicable after the order is made, make a written record of the application, inclusive of the information given by the applicant in support of the application.
16
Application by detainee for revocation or variation of preventative detention order or prohibited contact order
16 Application by detainee for revocation or variation of preventative detention order or prohibited contact order
(1) A person in relation to whom a preventative detention order made by the Supreme Court is in force may, with the leave of the Supreme Court, apply to the Supreme Court for –
(a) the revocation or a variation of the order; or
(b) the revocation or a variation of any prohibited contact order that is in force in relation to the person's detention under the preventative detention order.
(2) The Supreme Court must not grant leave to apply for the revocation or a variation of an order unless it is satisfied that new facts or circumstances have arisen since the making of the order or relevant matters had not been provided to the court in relation to the application for the order.
(3) To avoid doubt, an application for leave to apply for the revocation or a variation of an order does not operate as a stay of the order.
(4) If –
(a) a preventative detention order made by the Supreme Court is in force in relation to a person; and
(b) the Supreme Court grants leave to that person to apply for the revocation or a variation of the order; and
(c) the Supreme Court is satisfied, on the application of that person, that, because of new facts or circumstances that have arisen since the making of the order or relevant matters that had not been provided to the court in relation to the application for the order, it is appropriate that the order be revoked or varied –
the Court, by order, must revoke or vary the order.
(5) If the person in relation to whom a preventative detention order made by the Supreme Court is in force is being detained in a prison and the order is revoked or varied under subsection (4) , the police officer who is detaining the person under the order must cause a copy of the order made under that subsection to be given to the Director of Corrective Services as soon as practicable after it is made.
(6) If –
(a) a prohibited contact order is in force in relation to a person's detention under a preventative detention order made by the Supreme Court; and
(b) the Supreme Court grants leave to that person to apply for the revocation or a variation of the order; and
(c) the Supreme Court is satisfied, on the application of that person, that, because of new facts or circumstances that have arisen since the making of the order or relevant matters that had not been provided to the court in relation to the application for the order, it is appropriate that the order be revoked or varied –
the Court, by order, must revoke or vary the order.
(7) If the person in relation to whose detention under a preventative detention order a prohibited contact order is in force is being detained in a prison and the prohibited contact order is revoked or varied under subsection (6) , the police officer who is detaining the person under the preventative detention order must cause a copy of the order made under that subsection to be given to the Director of Corrective Services as soon as practicable after it is made.
17
Application by police for revocation or variation of preventative detention order or prohibited contact order
17 Application by police for revocation or variation of preventative detention order or prohibited contact order
(1) If –
(a) a preventative detention order is in force in relation to a person; and
(b) the police officer who is detaining the person under the order is satisfied that the grounds on which the order was made have ceased to exist –
an authorised police officer must as soon as practicable apply for the revocation of the order to the Supreme Court or, if the order was made by a senior police officer, to a senior police officer.
(2) If –
(a) a preventative detention order is in force in relation to a person; and
(b) the police officer who is detaining the person under the order is satisfied that, because of new facts or circumstances that have arisen since the making of the order or relevant matters that had not been provided to the court in relation to the application for the order, it is appropriate that the order be varied –
the authorised police officer must apply for a variation of the order to the Supreme Court or, if the order was made by a senior police officer, to a senior police officer.
(3) If –
(a) a preventative detention order is in force in relation to a person; and
(b) the Supreme Court or, if the order was made by a senior police officer, a senior police officer is satisfied, on application by an authorised police officer under subsection (1) or (2) that it is appropriate that the order be revoked or varied –
the Court, by order, or the officer, in writing, must revoke or vary the order.
(4) If the person in relation to whom the preventative detention order is in force is being detained in a prison and the order is revoked or varied under subsection (3) , the applicant for the revocation or variation must cause a copy of any instrument made under that subsection to be given to the Director of Corrective Services as soon as practicable after it is made.
(5) If –
(a) a prohibited contact order is in force in relation to a person's detention under a preventative detention order; and
(b) the police officer who is detaining the person under the preventative detention order is satisfied, because of new facts or circumstances that have arisen since the making of the order or relevant matters that had not been provided to the court in relation to the application for the order, that it is appropriate that the order be revoked or varied (including that the grounds on which the order was made have ceased to exist) –
an authorised police officer must apply for the revocation or a variation of the prohibited contact order to the Supreme Court or, if the order was made by a senior police officer, to a senior police officer.
(6) If –
(a) a prohibited contact order is in force in relation to a person's detention under a preventative detention order; and
(b) the Supreme Court or, if the order was made by a senior police officer, a senior police officer is satisfied, on application by a police officer under subsection (5) , that it is appropriate that the order be revoked or varied –
the Court, by order, or the officer, in writing, must revoke or vary the prohibited contact order.
(7) If the person in relation to whose detention under a preventative detention order a prohibited contact order is in force is being detained in a prison and the prohibited contact order is revoked or varied under subsection (6) , the applicant for the revocation or variation must cause a copy of any instrument made under that subsection to be given to the Director of Corrective Services as soon as practicable after it is made.
Part 3
Carrying out Preventative Detention Orders
Part 3 Carrying out Preventative Detention Orders
18
Power to detain person under preventative detention order
18 Power to detain person under preventative detention order
(1) While a preventative detention order is in effect in relation to a person –
(a) any police officer may take the person into custody; and
(b) any police officer may detain the person.
(2) A police officer may, for the purpose of taking a person into custody under a preventative detention order or preventing him or her from escaping from detention under the order, exercise any of the powers that he or she would have if he or she were apprehending the person under section 26 of theCriminal Code or the person was escaping from legal custody.
(3) Subsection (2) does not apply to the extent to which particular powers are provided for in this Act.
(4) If the person being detained is under the age of 18 years, the police officer must take such steps as are reasonably practicable to ensure that the person is not detained with any adult who is being detained under this or any other law at the place where the person is being detained.
(5) Notwithstanding subsection (4) , a police officer may detain a person with another family member of the person.
family member of a person has the same meaning as in section 32(1) .
(7) If a preventative detention order is made in relation to a person, the Commissioner of Police must nominate a police officer of or above the rank of commander (the "nominated senior police officer") to oversee the exercise of powers under, and the performance of obligations in relation to, the preventative detention order.
(8) The nominated senior police officer must be someone who was not involved in the making of the application for the preventative detention order or the making of the order in relation to the person.
(9) The nominated senior police officer must –
(a) oversee the exercise of powers under, and the performance of obligations in relation to, the preventative detention order; and
(b) without limiting paragraph (a) , ensure that the provisions of section 17 are complied with in relation to the preventative detention order; and
(c) receive and consider any representations that are made under subsection (10) .
(10) The following persons:
(a) the person being detained under a preventative detention order;
(c) a lawyer acting for the person being detained under a preventative detention order in relation to the order or a prohibited contact order;
(d) a person with whom the person being detained under a preventative detention order has contact under section 36(2) ;
(e) a person exercising authority under the order or implementing or enforcing the order (including a person taken to be such a person by force of section 25(5)(b) ) –
are entitled to make representations to the nominated senior police officer in relation to –
(f) the exercise of powers under, and the performance of obligations in relation to, the preventative detention order; and
(g) without limiting paragraph (f) , compliance with the provisions of section 17 in relation to the preventative detention order; and
(h) the person’s treatment in connection with the person’s detention under the preventative detention order.
19
Endorsement of order with date and time person taken into custody or detained
19 Endorsement of order with date and time person taken into custody or detained
As soon as practicable after a person is first taken into custody or detained under a preventative detention order, the police officer who is detaining the person under the order must endorse on the order –
(a) the date on which, and time at which, the person is first taken into custody or detained under the order; and
(b) particulars of where the person is being detained.
20
Requirement to provide name, &c.
20 Requirement to provide name, &c.
(1) If a police officer believes on reasonable grounds that a person whose name or address is, or whose name and address are, unknown to the police officer may be able to assist the police officer in executing a preventative detention order, the police officer may request the person to provide his or her name or address, or name and address, to the police officer.
(2) If a police officer –
(a) makes a request of a person under subsection (1) ; and
(b) informs the person of the reason for the request; and
(c) if the police officer is not in uniform, shows the person evidence that he or she is a police officer; and
(d) complies with subsection (4) if the person makes a request under that sub-section –
the person must not –
(e) refuse or fail to comply with the request; or
(f) give a name or address that is false in a material particular.
Penalty: Fine not exceeding 20 penalty units.
(3) Subsection (2) does not apply if the person has a reasonable excuse.
(4) If a police officer who makes a request of a person under subsection (1) is requested by the person to provide to the person any of the following:
(a) his or her name;
(b) the address of his or her place of duty;
(c) his or her identification number if he or she has an identification number;
(d) his or her rank if he or she does not have an identification number –
the police officer must not –
(e) refuse or fail to comply with the request; or
(f) give a name, address, number or rank that is false in a material particular.
Penalty: Fine not exceeding 5 penalty units.
(5) Subsection (4) does not apply if the police officer has a reasonable excuse.
21
Power to enter premises
21 Power to enter premises
(1) If –
(a) a preventative detention order is in force in relation to a person; and
(b) a police officer believes on reasonable grounds that the person is on any premises –
the police officer may enter the premises, using such force as is necessary and reasonable in the circumstances and with such assistance as is necessary, for the purpose of searching the premises for the person or taking the person into custody.
(2) A police officer may direct a person not to enter, or to leave or to remain in, premises or in the vicinity of premises that are being entered under this section.
22
Power to conduct personal search
22 Power to conduct personal search
(1) In this section –
body cavity means rectum or vagina;
electronic metal detection device means an electronic device that is capable of detecting the presence of metallic objects;
ordinary search means –
(a) a search of a person conducted by –
(i) running hands over the person's outer clothing; or
(ii) passing an electronic metal detection device over or in close proximity to the person's outer clothing; or
(iii) requiring the person to pass through such a device; or
(iv) requiring the person to turn out his or her pockets; and
(b) the examination of any thing worn or carried by, or in the control or possession of, the person that is conveniently removed including –
(i) an examination conducted by passing an electronic metal detection device over or in close proximity to that thing; and
(ii) passing the thing through such a device; and
(iii) searching through any bag, basket or other receptacle; and
(iv) moving, and if it is considered necessary, removing and searching through the contents of any pocket, bag, basket or other receptacle;
strip search means a search, other than a body cavity search, in which the person searched is required to remove most or all of his or her clothes.
(2) A police officer who takes a person into custody under a preventative detention order or who is present when the person is taken into custody may, if the police officer suspects on reasonable grounds –
(a) that it is prudent to do so in order to ascertain whether the person is carrying any seizable item; or
(b) that the person is carrying –
(i) evidence of or relating to a terrorist act; or
(ii) a seizable item –
conduct an ordinary search of a person at or soon after the time when the person is taken into custody and seize any thing found as a result of such a search.
(3) A police officer who is detaining a person under a preventative detention order may conduct a strip search of the person if the police officer believes on reasonable grounds that it is necessary to conduct a strip search of that person for the purposes of the search and that the seriousness and urgency of the circumstances require a strip search to be conducted.
(4) A police officer may detain a person for so long as is reasonably necessary to conduct a search under this section.
(5) Where a police officer detains a person for the purpose of a search under this section, the following provisions apply:
(a) if it is proposed to conduct a strip search, the search is to be conducted by an officer of the same sex as the person searched or by a person of the same sex under the direction of a police officer;
(b) if the search involves the application of force to the person, the police officer must give the Commissioner of Police a written report about the search within 7 days, including particulars of the circumstances that gave rise to the application of force.
23
Warrant under section 34E of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979 of the Commonwealth
23 Warrant under section 34E of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979 of the Commonwealth
(1) This section applies if –
(a) a person is being detained under a preventative detention order; and
(c) a copy of the warrant is given to the police officer who is detaining the person under the preventative detention order.
(2) The police officer must take such steps as are necessary to ensure that the person may be dealt with in accordance with the warrant.
(3) Without limiting subsection (2) , the police officer may, under section 24 , release, or arrange in writing for the release of, the person from detention under the preventative detention order so that the person may be dealt with in accordance with the warrant.
(4) To avoid doubt, the fact that the person is released from detention under the preventative detention order so that the person may be –
(a) questioned before a prescribed authority under the warrant; or
(b) detained under the warrant in connection with that questioning –
does not extend the period for which the preventative detention order remains in force in relation to the person.
24
Release of person from preventative detention
24 Release of person from preventative detention
(1) The police officer who is detaining a person under a preventative detention order may release the person from detention under the order or arrange in writing for his or her release from detention under the order.
(2) The police officer who releases, or arranges in writing for the release of, a person from detention under a preventative detention order must give the person a written statement signed by the police officer that the person is being released from that detention.
(3) Subsection (2) does not apply if the police officer releases, or arranges in writing for the release of, the person from detention so that the person may be dealt with –
(a) in connection with a charge relating to an alleged crime; or
(c) under the provisions of Division 4 of Part IAA, or Part IC, of the Crimes Act 1914 of the Commonwealth.
(4) To avoid doubt, a person may be taken to have been released from detention under a preventative detention order even if –
(a) the person is informed that he or she is being released from detention under the order; and
(b) the person is taken into custody on some other basis immediately after the person is informed that he or she is being released from detention under the order.
(5) To avoid doubt, a person is taken not to be detained under a preventative detention order during a period during which the person is released from detention under the order.
| Note: During this period, the provisions of this Act that apply to a person who is being detained under a preventative detention order (for example, section 31 which deals with the people the person may contact) do not apply to the person. |
(6) To avoid doubt –
(a) the release of the person under subsection (1) from detention under the preventative detention order does not extend the period for which the preventative detention order remains in force in relation to the person; and
| Note: This means that the time for which the person may be detained under the order continues to run while the person is released. |
(b) a person released under subsection (1) from detention under a preventative detention order may again be taken into custody and detained under the order at any time while the order remains in force in relation to the person.
25
Arrangement for detainee to be held in prison
25 Arrangement for detainee to be held in prison
(1) A senior police officer may request the Director of Corrective Services to authorise the transfer of a person who is being detained under a preventative detention order from the place where he or she is being detained to a prison.
(2) A request under subsection (1) must be accompanied by a copy of –
(a) the preventative detention order on which is endorsed the date on which, and time at which, the person was first taken into custody or detained under the order; and
(b) any extension or further extension of the order under section 11 ; and
(c) any prohibited contact order that is in force in relation to the person's detention under the preventative detention order.
(3) To avoid doubt, a request may be made under subsection (1) in respect of a person who is under 18 years of age.
(4) If requested to do so under subsection (1) , the Director of Corrective Services may, by instrument, authorise the transfer to a prison of a person being detained by a police officer under a preventative detention order from the place where he or she is being detained.
(5) If a person is being detained in a prison under a preventative detention order –
(a) the preventative detention order is taken to authorise the Director of Corrective Services to detain the person at the prison while the order is in force in relation to the person; and
(b) section 30 applies in relation to the person's detention under the order at the prison as if –
(i) the Director of Corrective Services; or
(ii) any other person involved in the person's detention at that prison –
were a person exercising authority under the order or implementing or enforcing the order; and
(c) the senior police officer who made the request under subsection (1) is taken, while the person is detained at the prison, to be the police officer detaining the person for the purposes of Parts 4 and 5 ; and
(d) a police officer may at any time enter the prison and visit the person being detained in the prison in connection with the exercise of powers under, and the performance of obligations in relation to, the order.
(6) The Corrections Act 1997 applies in respect of the detention of a person in a prison or police gaol under a preventative detention order or an order for his or her detention made under a corresponding preventative detention law as if the following provisions of that Act or made under that Act did not form part of it:
(7) A person permitted to contact a person being detained under a preventative detention order by visiting the person while the person subject to the order is being detained in a prison may enter the prison and visit the person in accordance with the procedures determined by the Director of Corrective Services and the police officer exercising authority under the preventative detention order.
(8) Nothing in this section prevents an AFP member entering a prison and visiting a person being detained in the prison in connection with the exercise of powers under, and the performance of obligations in relation to, an order for the person's detention made under a corresponding preventative detention law.
Part 4
Informing Person Detained about Preventative Detention Order
Part 4 Informing Person Detained about Preventative Detention Order
26
Effect of preventative detention order to be explained to person detained
26 Effect of preventative detention order to be explained to person detained
(1) As soon as practicable after a person is first detained under a preventative detention order, the police officer who is detaining the person under the order must inform the person of the matters covered by subsection (2) .
| Note: A contravention of this subsection does not affect the lawfulness of the person’s detention under the order (see section 28(5) ). |
(2) The matters covered by this subsection are –
(a) the fact that the preventative detention order has been made in relation to the person; and
(b) the period during which the person may be detained under the order; and
(c) the restrictions that apply to what the person being detained may convey to the people the person may contact while the person is being detained under the order; and
(d) the restrictions that apply to the people that the person may contact while the person is being detained under the order; and
(e) if the order was made by a senior police officer, the fact that an application may be made to the Supreme Court under Part 2 for a further preventative detention order; and
(f) any right the person has to complain to the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1978 in relation to –
(i) the application for, or the making of, the preventative detention order or a prohibited contact order; or
(ii) the treatment of the person in connection with the person's detention under the preventative detention order; and
(g) the fact that the person may seek from a court a remedy relating to –
(i) the preventative detention order; or
(ii) a prohibited contact order; or
(iii) the treatment of the person in connection with the person's detention under the preventative detention order; and
(h) the person’s entitlement under section 34 to contact a lawyer; and
(i) the name and work telephone number of the senior police officer who has been nominated under section 18(7) to oversee the exercise of powers under, and the performance of obligations in relation to, the order.
(a) the fact that a prohibited contact order has been made in relation to the person’s detention; or
(b) the name of a person specified in a prohibited contact order that has been made in relation to the person’s detention.
27
Person being detained to be informed of extension of preventative detention order
27 Person being detained to be informed of extension of preventative detention order
If a preventative detention order is extended, or further extended, under section 11 , the police officer detaining the person under the order must inform the person of the extension, or further extension, as soon as practicable after the extension, or further extension, is made.
| Note: A contravention of this section does not affect the lawfulness of the person’s detention under the order (see section 28(5) ). |
28
Compliance with obligations to inform
28 Compliance with obligations to inform
(1) Section 26(1) or section 27 does not apply if the actions of the person being detained under the preventative detention order make it impracticable for the police officer to comply with that section.
(2) The police officer detaining the person under the preventative detention order complies with section 26(1) if the police officer informs the person in substance of the matters covered by section 26(2) (even if this is not done in language of a precise or technical nature).
(3) The police officer who is detaining the person under the preventative detention order must arrange for the assistance of an interpreter in complying with section 26(1) or section 27 if the police officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person is unable, because of inadequate knowledge of the English language or a physical disability, to communicate with reasonable fluency in that language.
(4) Without limiting subsection (3) , the assistance of the interpreter may be provided by telephone.
(5) The lawfulness of a person’s detention under a preventative detention order is not affected by a failure to comply with section 26(1) or section 27 or subsection (3) of this section.
29
Copy of preventative detention order and prohibited contact order
29 Copy of preventative detention order and prohibited contact order
(1) As soon as practicable after a person is first taken into custody or detained under a preventative detention order, the police officer who is detaining the person under the order must give the person –
(a) a copy of the order and of any prohibited contact order in force in relation to his or her detention; and
(b) a summary of the grounds on which the preventative detention order or prohibited contact order is made.
(2) To avoid doubt, subsection (1)(b) does not require information to be included in the summary if the disclosure of the information is likely to prejudice national security (within the meaning of the National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 of the Commonwealth).
(3) Despite section 18(2) , a police officer does not need to have a copy of the preventative detention order with him or her, or to produce a copy of an order to the person being taken into custody when the police officer takes the person into custody.
(4) As soon as practicable after a preventative detention order is extended, or further extended, under section 11 , the police officer who is detaining the person under the preventative detention order must give the person a copy of the order made under section 11(6) .
(5) A person who is being detained under a preventative detention order may request a police officer who is detaining the person to arrange for a copy of –
(a) the preventative detention order or of any prohibited contact order in force in relation to his or her detention; or
to be given to a lawyer acting for the person in relation to the order.
| Note 1: Section 34 deals with the person's right to contact a lawyer and the obligation of the police officer detaining the person to give the person assistance to choose a lawyer. |
| Note 2: Section 37 prevents the person from contacting a lawyer who is specified in a prohibited contact order. |
(6) The police officer must make arrangements for a copy of an order or the summary to be given to the lawyer as soon as practicable after the request is made.
(7) Without limiting subsection (6) , the copy of an order or the summary may be faxed or emailed to the lawyer.
(8) To avoid doubt, subsection (6) does not entitle the lawyer to be given a copy of, or see, a document other than the preventative detention order, the prohibited contact order, the summary or any order under section 11(6) .
(9) The police officer who gives –
(a) the person being detained under a preventative detention order; or
(b) a lawyer acting for the person –
a copy of the preventative detention order under this section must endorse on the copy the date on which, and time at which, the person was first taken into custody or detained under the order.
(10) Subsection (1) , (4) , (6) or (9) does not apply if the actions of the person being detained under the preventative detention order make it impracticable for the police officer to comply with that subsection.
(11) The lawfulness of a person’s detention under a preventative detention order is not affected by a failure to comply with subsection (1) , (4) , (6) or (9) .
Part 5
Treatment of Person Detained
Part 5 Treatment of Person Detained
30
Humane treatment of person being detained
30 Humane treatment of person being detained
A person being taken into custody, or being detained, under a preventative detention order –
(a) must be treated with humanity and with respect for human dignity; and
(b) must not be subjected to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment –
by anyone exercising authority under the order or implementing or enforcing the order.
31
Restriction on contact with other people
31 Restriction on contact with other people
(1) Except as provided by sections 32 , 33 , 34 and 36 , while a person is being detained under a preventative detention order, the person –
(a) is not entitled to contact another person; and
(b) may be prevented from contacting another person.
| Note 1: This section will not apply to the person if the person is released from detention under the order (even though the order may still be in force in relation to the person). |
| Note 2: A person’s entitlement to contact other people under sections 32 , 33 , 34 and 36 may be subject to a prohibited contact order made under section 14 or 15 (see section 37 ). |
(2) While a person is being detained in a prison under a preventative detention order or an order for the person's detention made under a corresponding preventative detention law, the person is required to give to a police officer or an AFP member, as the case requires, exercising authority under the order any letter that he or she wishes to send to any person other than the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1978 or the Commonwealth Ombudsman under the Complaints (Australian Federal Police) Act 1981 of the Commonwealth.
(3) A prison officer within the meaning of the Corrections Act 1997 who receives –
(a) from a person being detained in a prison under an order referred to in subsection (2) a letter required by that subsection to be given to a police officer or AFP member exercising authority under the order; or
(b) a letter sent to a person being detained in a prison under an order referred to in subsection (2) –
must as soon as practicable give that letter to such a police officer or AFP member.
| Note 1: This section will not apply to the person if the person is released from detention under the order (even though the order may still be in force in relation to the person). |
| Note 2: A person’s entitlement to contact other people under sections 32 , 34 and 36 may be subject to a prohibited contact order made under section 14 or 15 . |
(c) a parent, step-parent or grandparent of the person; or
(d) a child, stepchild or grandchild of the person; or
(e) a brother, sister, stepbrother or stepsister of the person; or
(f) a guardian or carer of the person.
(2) The person being detained is entitled to contact once –
(a) his or her parents or one of his or her other family members; and
(b) if he or she –
(i) lives with another person and that other person is not a family member of the person being detained; or
(ii) lives with other people and those other people are not family members of the person being detained –
that other person or one of those other people; and
(c) if he or she is employed, his or her employer; and
(d) if he or she employs people in a business, one of the people he or she employs in that business; and
(e) if he or she engages in a business together with another person or other people, that other person or one of those other people; and
(f) if the police officer detaining the person agrees to the person contacting another person, that other person –
by telephone, fax or email but solely for the purposes of letting the person contacted know that the person being detained is safe but is not able to be contacted for a specified period or for the time being (if the preventative detention order prohibits a period being specified).
(3) To avoid doubt, the person being detained is not entitled, under subsection (2) , to disclose –
(a) the fact that a preventative detention order has been made in relation to the person; or
(b) the fact that the person is being detained.
(4) If the preventative detention order so allows, the person being detained, in addition to any entitlement under subsection (2) , is entitled, while being detained under the order, to have further contact with one or more of his or her family members or any other person or persons, as specified in the order.
(5) To avoid doubt, the person being detained is entitled to disclose the following to a person with whom he or she has contact under subsection (4) :
(a) the fact that a preventative detention order has been made in relation to the person;
(b) the fact that the person is being detained;
(c) unless the preventative detention order otherwise provides, the period for which the person is being detained.
(6) The form of contact that the person being detained is entitled to have with another person under subsection (4) includes –
(a) being visited by that other person; and
(b) communicating with that other person by telephone, fax or email.
(7) The period for which the person being detained is entitled to have contact with another person on any day under subsection (4) , and the number of days on which he or she is entitled to have such contact, is as specified in the preventative detention order.
33
Contacting Ombudsman
33 Contacting Ombudsman
The person being detained is entitled to contact the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1978 .
34
Contacting lawyer
34 Contacting lawyer
(1) The person being detained is entitled to contact a lawyer but solely for the purpose of –
(a) obtaining advice from the lawyer about the person's legal rights in relation to –
(i) the preventative detention order; or
(ii) a prohibited contact order in force in relation to his or her detention; or
(iii) the treatment of the person in connection with the person's detention under the preventative detention order; or
(b) arranging for the lawyer to act for the person in relation to, and instructing the lawyer in relation to, proceedings in a court for a remedy relating to –
(i) the preventative detention order; or
(ii) a prohibited contact order in force in relation to his or her detention; or
(iii) the treatment of the person in connection with the person's detention under the preventative detention order; or
(c) arranging for the lawyer to act for the person in relation to, and instructing the lawyer in relation to, a complaint to the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1978 in relation to –
(i) the application for, or the making of, the preventative detention order or a prohibited contact order; or
(ii) the treatment of the person by a police officer in connection with the person’s detention under the preventative detention order; or
(d) arranging for the lawyer to act for the person in relation to an appearance, or hearing, before a court or tribunal in a proceeding to which the person is a party or in which he or she otherwise has standing to appear that is to take place while the person is being detained under the order.
(2) The form of contact that the person being detained is entitled to have with a lawyer under subsection (1) includes –
(a) being visited by the lawyer; and
(b) communicating with the lawyer by telephone, fax or email.
(3) If –
(a) the person being detained or, if he or she is under 18 years of age or is incapable of managing his or her affairs, a person with whom he or she has contact under section 36 asks to be allowed to contact a particular lawyer under subsection (1) ; and
(b) either –
(i) the person is not entitled to contact that lawyer because of section 37 (prohibited contact order); or
(ii) the person is not able to contact that lawyer –
the police officer who is detaining the person must give the person reasonable assistance to choose another lawyer for the person to contact under subsection (1) .
(a) the person is unable, because of inadequate knowledge of the English language, or a disability, to communicate with reasonable fluency in that language; and
(b) the person may have difficulties in choosing or contacting a lawyer because of that inability –
the police officer must give the person reasonable assistance (including, if appropriate, by arranging for the assistance of an interpreter) to choose and contact a lawyer under subsection (1) .
(4) In recommending lawyers as part of giving a person assistance under subsection (3) , the police officer who is detaining the person may give priority to lawyers who have been given a security clearance at an appropriate level by the Attorney-General's Department of the Commonwealth.
(5) Despite subsection (4) but subject to section 37 , the person is entitled under this section to contact a lawyer who does not have a security clearance of the kind referred to in subsection (4) .
35
Monitoring contact under section 32 or 34
35 Monitoring contact under section 32 or 34
(1) The contact the person being detained has with another person under section 32 or 34 may take place only if it is conducted in such a way that the contact, and the content and meaning of the communication that takes place during the contact, can be effectively monitored by a police officer exercising authority under the preventative detention order.
(2) The contact may take place in a language other than English only if the content and meaning of the communication that takes place during the contact can be effectively monitored with the assistance of an interpreter.
(3) Without limiting subsection (2) , the interpreter referred to in that subsection may be a police officer.
(4) If the person being detained indicates that he or she wishes the contact to take place in a language other than English, the police officer who is detaining the person must –
(a) arrange for the services of an appropriate interpreter to be provided if it is reasonably practicable to do so during the period during which the person is being detained; and
(b) if it is reasonably practicable to do so, arrange for those services to be provided as soon as practicable.
(5) Any communication between –
(a) a person who is being detained under a preventative detention order; and
(b) a lawyer –
for a purpose referred to in section 34(1)(a) , (b) , (c) or (d) is not admissible in evidence against the person in any proceedings in a court or tribunal.
36
Special contact rules for person under 18 or incapable of managing own affairs
36 Special contact rules for person under 18 or incapable of managing own affairs
(1) This section applies if the person being detained under a preventative detention order –
(a) is under 18 years of age; or
(b) is incapable of managing his or her affairs.
(2) The person is entitled, while being detained under the order, to have contact with –
(a) a parent or guardian of the person; or
(b) another person who –
(i) is able to represent the person's interests; and
(ii) is, as far as practicable in the circumstances, acceptable to the person and to the police officer who is detaining the person; and
(iii) is not a police officer; and
(iv) is not an AFP member or an AFP employee; and
(v) is not a member (however described) of a police force of another State or of a Territory; and
(a) if the person being detained (the "detainee") has 2 parents or 2 or more guardians, the detainee is entitled, subject to section 37 , to have contact under subsection (2) with each of those parents or guardians; and
(b) the detainee is entitled to disclose the following to a person with whom the detainee has contact under subsection (2) :
(i) the fact that a preventative detention order has been made in relation to the detainee;
(ii) the fact that the detainee is being detained;
(iii) the period for which the detainee is being detained.
(4) The form of contact that the person being detained is entitled to have with another person under subsection (2) includes –
(a) being visited by that other person; and
(b) communicating with that other person by telephone, fax or email.
(5) The period for which the person being detained is entitled to have contact with another person each day under subsection (2) is –
(a) 2 hours; or
(b) such longer period as is specified in the preventative detention order.
| Note: See section 8(5) . |
(6) Despite subsection (5) , the police officer who is detaining the person may permit the person to have contact with a person under subsection (2) for a period that is longer than the period provided for in subsection (5) .
(7) The contact that the person being detained has with another person under subsection (2) must be conducted in such a way that the content and meaning of any communication that takes place during the contact can be effectively monitored by a police officer exercising authority under the preventative detention order.
(8) If the communication that takes place during the contact takes place in a language other than English, the contact may continue only if the content and meaning of the communication in that language can be effectively monitored with the assistance of an interpreter.
(9) Without limiting subsection (8) , the interpreter referred to in that subsection may be a police officer.
(10) If the person being detained indicates that he or she wishes the communication that takes place during the contact to take place in a language other than English, the police officer who is detaining the person must –
(a) arrange for the services of an appropriate interpreter to be provided if it is reasonably practicable to do so during the period during which the person is being detained; and
(b) if it is reasonably practicable to do so, arrange for those services to be provided as soon as practicable.
37
Entitlement to contact subject to prohibited contact order
37 Entitlement to contact subject to prohibited contact order
Sections 32 , 34 and 36 have effect subject to any prohibited contact order made in relation to the person's detention.
38
Disclosure offences
38 Disclosure offences
(1) A person (the "subject") commits an offence if –
(a) the subject is being detained under a preventative detention order; and
(b) the subject intentionally discloses to another person –
(i) the fact that a preventative detention order has been made in relation to the subject; or
(ii) the fact that the subject is being detained; or
(iii) the fact that a prohibited contact order has been made in relation to the subject's detention; and
(c) the disclosure occurs while the subject is being detained under the order; and
(d) the disclosure is not one that the subject is entitled to make under section 33 , 34 or 36 .
Penalty: Imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years.
(2) A person (the "lawyer") commits an offence if –
(a) a person being detained under a preventative detention order (the "detainee") contacts the lawyer under section 34 , or a person with whom the detainee has contact under section 36 contacts the lawyer as mentioned in subsection (3)(e)(ii) of this section; and
(b) the lawyer intentionally discloses to another person –
(i) the fact that a preventative detention order has been made in relation to the detainee; or
(ii) the fact that the detainee is being detained; or
(iii) any information that the detainee or other person gives the lawyer in the course of the contact; and
(c) the disclosure occurs while the detainee is being detained under the order; and
(d) the disclosure is not made for the purposes of –
(i) proceedings in a court for a remedy relating to the preventative detention order, a prohibited contact order or the treatment of the detainee in connection with the detainee's detention under the preventative detention order; or
(ii) a complaint to the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1978 in relation to the application for, or making of, the preventative detention order or a prohibited contact order or the treatment of the detainee by a police officer in connection with the detainee’s detention under the preventative detention order; or
(iii) making representations to the senior police officer nominated under section 18(7) in relation to the preventative detention order, or another police officer involved in the detainee’s detention, about the exercise of powers under the order, the performance of obligations in relation to the order or the treatment of the detainee in connection with the detainee’s detention under the order.
Penalty: Imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years.
(3) A person (the "parent/guardian") commits an offence if –
(a) a person being detained under a preventative detention order (the "detainee") has contact with the parent/guardian under section 36 ; and
(b) the parent/guardian intentionally discloses to another person –
(i) the fact that a preventative detention order has been made in relation to the detainee; or
(ii) the fact that the detainee is being detained; or
(iii) any information that the detainee gives the parent/guardian in the course of the contact; and
(c) the other person is a person whom the detainee is prohibited from contacting under this Act; and
(d) the disclosure occurs while the detainee is being detained under the order; and
(e) the disclosure is not made for the purposes of –
(i) a complaint to the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1978 in relation to the application for, or the making of, the preventative detention order or a prohibited contact order or the treatment of the detainee by a police officer in connection with the detainee's detention under the preventative detention order; or
(ii) contacting a lawyer whom the detainee is entitled to contact under section 34 for any purpose for which the detainee is entitled to contact that lawyer under that section; or
(iii) making representations to the senior police officer nominated under section 18(7) in relation to the preventative detention order, or another police officer involved in the detainee’s detention, about the exercise of powers under the order, the performance of obligations in relation to the order or the treatment of the detainee in connection with the detainee’s detention under the order.
Penalty: Imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years.
(4) To avoid doubt, a person does not contravene subsection (2) or (3) merely by letting another person know that the detainee is safe but is not able to be contacted for a specified period or for the time being (if the preventative detention order prohibits a period being specified).
(5) A person (the "interpreter") commits an offence if –
(a) the interpreter is an interpreter who assists in monitoring the contact that a person being detained under a preventative detention order (the "detainee") has with someone while the detainee is being detained under the order; and
(b) the interpreter intentionally discloses to another person –
(i) the fact that a preventative detention order has been made in relation to the detainee; or
(ii) the fact that the detainee is being detained; or
(iii) any information that the interpreter obtains in the course of assisting in the monitoring of that contact; and
(c) the disclosure occurs while the detainee is being detained under the order.
Penalty: Imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years.
(6) A person (the "disclosure recipient") commits an offence if –
(a) a person (the "earlier discloser") discloses to the disclosure recipient –
(i) the fact that a preventative detention order has been made in relation to a person; or
(ii) the fact that a person is being detained under a preventative detention order; or
(iii) any information that a person who is being detained under a preventative detention order communicates to a person while the person is being detained under the order; and
(b) the disclosure by the earlier discloser to the disclosure recipient contravenes –
(c) the disclosure recipient intentionally discloses that information to another person; and
(d) the disclosure by the disclosure recipient occurs while the person referred to in paragraph (a)(i) , (ii) or (iii) is being detained under the order; and
(e) the disclosure is not made to a person exercising authority under the preventative detention order or implementing or enforcing the order or with responsibility for the safety or wellbeing of the person being detained under the order.
Penalty: Imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years.
(7) A person (the "monitor") commits an offence if –
(a) the monitor is –
(i) a police officer who monitors; or
(ii) an interpreter who assists in monitoring –
contact that a person being detained under a preventative detention order (the "detainee") has with a lawyer under section 34 while the detainee is being detained under the order; and
(b) information is communicated in the course of that contact; and
(c) the information is communicated for one of the purposes referred to in section 34(1) ; and
(d) the monitor intentionally discloses that information to another person.
Penalty: Imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years.
39
Questioning of person prohibited while person is detained
39 Questioning of person prohibited while person is detained
(1) A police officer must not question a person while the person is being detained under a preventative detention order except for the purposes of –
(a) determining whether the person is the person in relation to whom the order is made; or
(b) ensuring the safety and wellbeing of the person being detained; or
(c) allowing the police officer to comply with a requirement of this Act in relation to the person's detention under the order.
(2) A police officer must not question a person while the person is being detained under an order made under a corresponding preventative detention law.
| Note: This section will not apply to the person if the person is released from detention under the order (even though the order may still be in force in relation to the person). |
40
Taking identification material
40 Taking identification material
(1) A police officer must not take identification material from a person who is being detained under a preventative detention order except in accordance with this section.
(2) A police officer who is of or above the rank of sergeant may take identification material from the person, or cause identification material from the person to be taken, if –
(a) the person consents in writing; or
(b) the police officer believes on reasonable grounds that it is necessary to do so for the purpose of confirming the person’s identity as the person in relation to whom the order is made.
(3) A police officer may use such force as is necessary and reasonable in the circumstances to take identification material from a person under this section.
(4) Subject to this section, a police officer must not take identification material (other than hand prints, fingerprints, footprints or toeprints) from the person if the person –
(a) is under 18 years of age; or
(b) is incapable of managing his or her affairs –
unless a magistrate orders that the material be taken.
(5) In deciding whether to make such an order, the magistrate must have regard to –
(a) the age, or any disability, of the person; and
(b) such other matters as it thinks fit.
(6) The taking of identification material from a person who –
(a) is under 18 years of age; or
(b) is incapable of managing his or her affairs –
must be done in the presence of –
(c) a parent or guardian of the person; or
(d) if a parent or guardian of the person is not acceptable to the person, another appropriate person.
(7) Despite this section, identification material may be taken from a person who is under 18 years of age and is capable of managing his or her affairs if –
(b) subsection (8) or (9) is satisfied (but not both) and a magistrate orders that the material be taken.
(8) For the purposes of subsection (7) this subsection is satisfied if the person agrees in writing to the taking of the material.
(9) For the purposes of subsection (7) this subsection is satisfied if either –
(a) a parent or guardian of the person; or
(b) if a parent or guardian is not acceptable to the person, another appropriate person –
agrees in writing to the taking of the material.
(10) A reference in this section to an "appropriate person" in relation to a person (the "subject") who is under 18 years of age, or incapable of managing his or her affairs, is a reference to a person who –
(a) is capable of representing the subject's interests; and
(b) as far as is practicable in the circumstances, is acceptable to the subject and the police officer who is detaining the subject; and
(c) is none of the following:
(i) a police officer;
(ii) an AFP member or an AFP employee;
(iii) a member (however described) of a police force of another State or of a Territory;
(1) This section applies if identification material is taken under section 40 from a person being detained under a preventative detention order.
(2) The material may be used only for the purpose of determining whether the person is the person in relation to whom the order is made.
(3) To avoid doubt, if the person is being detained in a prison under the preventative detention order, the material may be provided to the Director of Corrective Services and used by him or her only for the purpose of identifying the person on his or her reception into the prison.
(4) If –
(a) a period of 12 months elapses after the identification material is taken; and
(b) proceedings in respect of –
(i) the preventative detention order; or
(ii) the treatment of the person in connection with the person's detention under the order –
have not been brought, or have been brought and discontinued or completed, within that period –
the material (including any material provided to the Director of Corrective Services) must be destroyed as soon as practicable after the end of that period.
42
Offences of contravening safeguards
42 Offences of contravening safeguards
(1) A person commits an offence if –
(a) the person does an act or omits to perform an act; and
Penalty: Imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years.
(2) A person commits an offence if the person does an act or omits to perform an act and the act or omission contravenes section 30 .
Penalty: Imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years.
Part 6
Miscellaneous
Part 6 Miscellaneous
43
Standard of proof
43 Standard of proof
Any question of fact to be decided by a court on an application under this Act is to be decided on the balance of probabilities.
44
Nature of proceedings
44 Nature of proceedings
(1) Proceedings on an application under this Act are civil in nature, except as otherwise provided by this Act.
(2) Despite subsection (1) , the rules regulating the practice and procedure of a court in civil proceedings do not apply to a proceeding on an application under this Act.
(3) Proceedings before a court under this Act are subject to the operation of the National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 of the Commonwealth.
45
False or misleading information or documents
45 False or misleading information or documents
A police officer must not, in connection with an application to a senior police officer for a preventative detention order or a prohibited contact order, do either of the following:
(a) give information (whether orally or in writing) that the police officer knows to be false or misleading in a material particular;
(b) produce a document that the police officer knows to be false or misleading in a material particular without –
(i) indicating to the senior police officer that it is false or misleading, and the respect in which it is false or misleading; and
(ii) providing correct information to that senior police officer, if the police officer is in possession of, or can reasonably acquire, the correct information.
Penalty: Imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months.
46
Police officer detaining person under a preventative detention order
46 Police officer detaining person under a preventative detention order
If –
(a) a number of police officers are detaining, or involved in the detention of, a person under a preventative detention order at a particular time; and
(b) a power or obligation is expressed in this Act to be conferred or imposed on the police officer detaining the person –
the power or obligation is conferred or imposed at that time on the most senior of those police officers.
47
Ombudsman, &c., functions and powers not affected
47 Ombudsman, &c., functions and powers not affected
This Act does not affect a function or power of the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1978 .
48
Law relating to legal professional privilege not affected
48 Law relating to legal professional privilege not affected
To avoid doubt, this Act does not affect the law relating to legal professional privilege.
49
Legal proceedings in relation to orders
49 Legal proceedings in relation to orders
(1) Proceedings may be brought in a court for a remedy in relation to –
(a) a preventative detention order; or
(b) a prohibited contact order; or
(c) the treatment of a person in connection with the person's detention under a preventative detention order.
(2) If –
(a) a person applies to a court for –
(i) review of the application for, or the making of, a preventative detention order or a prohibited contact order or the person’s treatment in connection with the person’s detention under a preventative detention order; or
(ii) a remedy in relation to the application for, or the making of, a preventative detention order or a prohibited contact order or the person’s treatment in connection with the person’s detention under a preventative detention order; and
(b) the person applies to the court for an order under this subsection –
the court may order the Commissioner of Police to give to the court, and the parties to the proceedings, the information that was put before the Supreme Court or the senior police officer (as the case requires) when the application for the order was made.
(3) Subsection (2) does not require information to be given to the court, or the parties to the proceedings, if the disclosure of the information is likely to prejudice national security (within the meaning of the National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 of the Commonwealth).
50
Closure of Supreme Court and restriction on publication of proceedings
50 Closure of Supreme Court and restriction on publication of proceedings
(1) This section applies to proceedings before the Supreme Court in connection with applications for the making, varying or revocation of preventative detention orders or prohibited contact orders.
(2) Any such proceedings must be heard in the absence of the public.
(3) The Supreme Court may, in connection with any such proceedings, do anything necessary or convenient to suppress the publication of the whole or any part of the proceedings or of the evidence given in the proceedings as it considers necessary to secure the suppression of the publication of the proceedings or evidence given in the proceedings.
51
Annual report
51 Annual report
(1) The Minister must, as soon as practicable after each 30 June, cause to be prepared a report about the operation of this Act during the year ended on that 30 June.
(2) Without limiting subsection (1) , a report relating to a year must include the following matters:
(a) the number of preventative detention orders made by a senior police officer under section 7 during the year and the number of applications for such orders made during the year;
(b) the number of preventative detention orders made by the Supreme Court under section 7 during the year and the number of applications for such orders made during the year;
(c) whether a person was taken into custody or detained under each of those orders and, if so, for how long the person was detained;
(d) particulars of any complaints in relation to the detention of a person under a preventative detention order made or referred during the year to the Ombudsman under the Ombudsman Act 1978 ;
(3) The Minister must cause a copy of the report to be laid before each House of the Parliament by not later than 31 October after the year to which it relates.
(4) The report may be included in the annual report of the Department.
52
Regulations
52 Regulations
(1) The Governor may make regulations for the purposes of this Act.
(2) The regulations may be made so as to apply differently according to such factors as are specified in the regulations.
(3) The regulations may authorise any matter to be from time to time determined, applied or regulated by any person specified in the regulations.
Sourced from Tasmanian Legislation Online (legislation.tas.gov.au), CC BY 4.0.
Part 1 Preliminary
Part 1 Preliminary
1 Short title
1 Short title
This Act may be cited as the Terrorism (Preventative Detention) Act 2005 .
2 Commencement
2 Commencement
This Act commences on a day to be proclaimed.
3 Interpretation
3 Interpretation
(1) In this Act, unless the contrary intention appears –
AFP employee has the same meaning as in the Australian Federal Police Act 1979 of the Commonwealth;
[Section 3 Subsection (1) amended by No. 36 of 2015, s. 4, Applied:13 Oct 2015]AFP member has the same meaning as in Part 5.3 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code;
[Section 3 Subsection (1) amended by No. 36 of 2015, s. 4, Applied:13 Oct 2015]ASIO affiliate has the same meaning as in the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979 of the Commonwealth;
[Section 3 Subsection (1) amended by No. 36 of 2015, s. 4, Applied:13 Oct 2015]ASIO employee has the same meaning as in the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979 of the Commonwealth;
authorised police officer means a police officer appointed by the Commissioner of Police under subsection (2) ;
[Section 3 Subsection (1) amended by No. 36 of 2015, s. 4, Applied:13 Oct 2015]Commonwealth control order has the same meaning as "control order" has in Part 5.3 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code;
[Section 3 Subsection (1) amended by No. 36 of 2015, s. 4, Applied:13 Oct 2015]Commonwealth Criminal Code means the Criminal Code set out in the Schedule to the of the Commonwealth, or a law of the Commonwealth that replaces that Code;
Criminal offences and civil remedies are included: disclosure offences with penalties up to five years imprisonment (s 38), offences for contravening specific safeguards (s 42), and an express civil remedy route with disclosure of material put before the decision-maker subject to national security exclusions (s 49).
Proceedings are civil (s 44(1)), decided on the balance of probabilities (s 43), but the Supreme Court proceedings are to be held in camera and the Court may suppress publication of proceedings or evidence (s 50).
The Act cross-references Commonwealth instruments including Division 105 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code and ASIO warrants (s 3; s 23).
A sunset applies: no orders can be made after 31 December 2030, and orders in force on that date cease (s 54).
The Act therefore shifts certain short-term deprivation-of-liberty decisions into a civil, court-supervised police framework with statutory limits, information rules, and monitoring and reporting obligations. The statutory text sets the decision points, time limits, avenues for variation or revocation (ss 11, 16-17), and reporting requirements (s 51).
Main concepts
The Act defines a compact set of legal concepts that determine eligibility, the type and duration of intervention, and the universe of permitted operational responses.
Preventative detention order. Defined in s 3 and substantively in s 8. It is a written order authorising a subject to be taken into custody and detained for a specified period starting when first taken into custody (s 8(1)-(2)). When made by the Supreme Court, the statutory baseline maximum period is 14 days, subject to extension under s 11 and the calculation rules in s 9(2) that subtract time already spent in detention under equivalent orders.
Interim preventative detention order. The Supreme Court may make an interim order pending final determination when an application is made to it without notice (s 7(4)-(8)). The interim order maximum is 48 hours (s 9(3)).
Applicant and authorised police officer. Applications must be made by authorised police officers as defined at s 3 and appointed under s 3(2). The applicant is the officer bringing the application (s 5(1)).
Grounds for orders. Two separate statutory bases appear in s 5(1) and s 7(1): (1) reasonable grounds to suspect imminent engagement in a terrorist act, possession of items connected to preparation, or preparatory acts, where detention would substantially assist prevention and is reasonably necessary (s 5(1)(a); s 7(1)(a)); (2) when a terrorist act occurred within the last 28 days and detention is reasonably necessary to preserve evidence (s 5(1)(b); s 7(1)(b)). Imminence is defined: the terrorist act must be imminent and expected to occur within 14 days (s 5(2); s 7(2)).
Prohibited contact order. Separate instrument enacted under ss 14-15 that can accompany or follow a preventative detention order to restrict the detainee’s communication with specified persons while detained.
Monitoring, disclosure and secrecy. Contact while detained must be conducted so content and meaning can be effectively monitored by police (s 35). The Act creates disclosure offences for the detainee, lawyers, parents/guardians, interpreters and monitors, with penalties up to five years (s 38). The Supreme Court proceedings are in camera and the Court may suppress publication (s 50). Summaries given to detainees need not disclose material likely to prejudice national security under the Commonwealth National Security Information Act (s 29(2)).
Interactions with Commonwealth and other State/territory laws. The Act expressly refers to corresponding preventative detention laws, Division 105 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code, Commonwealth control orders, and ASIO warrants. The definition of corresponding law is both textual and capable of being declared by regulation (s 3).
Procedural form and proof. Applications must set out identity, grounds and the period sought, and in most cases be in writing and sworn (s 6). The standard of proof on factual questions is the balance of probabilities (s 43). Proceedings are civil, but civil practice rules do not apply (s 44(2)).
Oversight and remedies. A nominated senior police officer must oversee implementation and receive representations (s 18(7)-(10)). The detainee has specified rights to complaint to the Ombudsman (s 26(2)(f)) and to seek court review or remedies (s 49). The Supreme Court may declare a police-made order void and order compensation where it was so unreasonable no senior police officer acting reasonably could have made it (s 7(11)-(12)).
These concepts delimit when short-term deprivation of liberty is permitted, how contact and legal assistance are handled, which procedural forms must be followed, and how the State must report and ensure oversight.
Who it affects
The Act names specific classes of decision-makers, operational actors, and persons subject to orders, and imposes obligations and criminal penalties that allocate costs between the State, police, detainees, lawyers and third parties.
Subjects of orders. Any person aged 16 or over can be the subject of an application, but no preventative detention order may be applied for or made in relation to a person under 16 years (s 12(1)). Special contact and identification safeguards apply to persons under 18 and persons incapable of managing their affairs (ss 8(5); 36; 40).
Police. Authorised police officers initiate proceedings (s 5), apply for prohibited contact orders (s 14-15), may make urgent applications to senior police officers (s 5(3); s 6(1B)), and exercise powers to take into custody, detain (s 18), enter premises (s 21), search (s 22) and take identification material (s 40). The Commissioner must appoint a nominated senior police officer to oversee each order’s implementation who was not involved in the application or decision (s 18(7)-(9)). Police who provide false or misleading information in connection with applications face criminal liability (s 45).
Senior police officers. May receive urgent applications and make orders in place of the Supreme Court in specified urgent circumstances (s 5(3); s 7(1)). Orders made by senior police officers are subject to temporal limits, and the Act requires an application be made to the Supreme Court as soon as practicable after police order detaining a person (s 9(4)).
Courts and judicial officers. The Supreme Court makes and reviews orders, may make interim orders and must hear proceedings in the absence of the public (s 7(4)-(8); s 50). The Court decides fact questions on the balance of probabilities (s 43) and can order disclosure of material placed before decision-makers in later review proceedings subject to national security exclusions (s 49).
Lawyers. Detainees have an entitlement to contact a lawyer for specified purposes (s 34). Lawyers who intentionally disclose protected information contrary to s 38(2) commit an offence subject to up to five years imprisonment. Police must assist detainees to choose a lawyer where contact is not possible (s 34(3)). Police may give priority to lawyers with security clearances when recommending counsel (s 34(4)), but the detainee may contact a lawyer without that clearance (s 34(5)).
Family, guardians and other contacts. The Act specifies limited categories of persons detainees may contact (s 32). Parents or guardians and other persons representing the interests of a detained minor or an incapable person have specified entitlements under s 36. Parents/guardians who intentionally disclose prohibited information may commit an offence (s 38(3)).
Interpreters and monitors. The Act contemplates interpreters may assist monitoring (s 35(2)-(3)) and creates offences for interpreters and monitors who intentionally disclose protected information (s 38(5), (7)). Police officers may serve as interpreters (s 35(3); s 36(9)).
Corrections authorities. The Director of Corrective Services is involved when a detainee is transferred to prison under s 25. The Act modifies application of the Corrections Act in these cases by excluding enumerated sections and regulations (s 25(6)).
Oversight and accountability bodies. The Ombudsman is an explicitly named contact the detainee may approach (s 26(2)(f); s 33). The Minister must produce an annual operational report (s 51).
The State. The State bears potential compensation liability where a Supreme Court determines a police-made order was so unreasonable no senior police officer acting reasonably could have made it (s 7(11)-(12)). The Minister must report annually (s 51).
In short, the Act assigns operational authority primarily to police, reserves judicial review and extensions to the Supreme Court, prescribes rights and limits for detainees and their advisers, and creates criminal sanctions for unauthorised disclosures by a range of actors. The statutory text identifies who exercises decisions, who can be targeted, who receives information, and who faces criminal or civil exposure for failure to comply.
Key duties and rights
The Act sets out an array of duties for police and rights for detainees and intervening parties. These are statutory obligations, procedural entitlements and constraints that shape operational choices.
Duties on police and decision-makers:
Application form and verification. An authorised police officer applying for a preventative detention order must set out identity particulars, grounds and the period sought, and in most cases the application must be in writing and sworn (s 6(1); s 6(1A)-(4)). Oral or electronic applications are permitted only in urgent circumstances and must be justified as necessary by the court or senior officer (s 6(1B), (1C); s 6(4A); s 6(7); s 14(2A)-(2C); s 15(2A)-(2C)).
Prompt Supreme Court application after police orders. If detention is effected under a senior police officer’s order, an application to the Supreme Court must be made as soon as practicable (s 9(4)).
Record-keeping and notification. Police must endorse on the order the date, time and place when the person was first taken into custody (s 19). Copies of orders and extensions must be given to detainees and, where applicable, to their lawyers and to the Director of Corrective Services if detained in prison (ss 24(2); 29(1)-(4); 11(9); 25(2), (4)-(5)).
Oversight. The Commissioner must nominate a senior police officer not involved in the application to oversee the order’s exercise and receive representations from detainees, lawyers, the Ombudsman and others (s 18(7)-(10)). That nominated officer must ensure compliance with s 17 (applications by police to revoke or vary) (s 18(9)(b)).
Informational duties. As soon as practicable after being detained, police must inform the detainee of core matters including that an order has been made, the detention period, restrictions on disclosure, rights to complain to the Ombudsman, the right to contact a lawyer and the name and number of the nominated senior police officer (s 26(1)-(2); s 26(3)-(4)).
Assistance to contact a lawyer and interpreter access. Police must arrange reasonable assistance to choose and contact a lawyer where the detainee cannot contact a particular lawyer or lacks language capacity, and must arrange an interpreter if required to communicate the statutory information (ss 28(3)-(4); 34(3), (3A), (4)).
Search and identification safeguards. Strip searches may be conducted only where necessary and urgency justifies them, must be same-sex, and use of force must be reported (s 22(3), (5)). Identification material may only be taken in specified circumstances and with magistrate oversight for minors or incapable persons (s 40(2)-(9)).
Rights and entitlements for detainees:
Right to information. Detainees must be informed of the order and their rights, and must be given copies of the order and a summary of grounds (ss 26; 29(1)). Non-disclosure is permitted where national security would be prejudiced (s 29(2); s 49(3)).
Contact entitlements. Detainees have limited contact entitlements: contact with family members and certain others once for safety notification (s 32(2)-(3)); additional contact only if the order allows (s 32(4)); contact with the Ombudsman (s 33); and contact with a lawyer for stated legal purposes (s 34(1)-(2)). Special rules apply for minors and incapable persons, including entitlement to two hours per day with parents/guardians unless extended by order (s 36).
Legal assistance and confidentiality safeguards. Communications with a lawyer for specified purposes are not admissible against the detainee (s 35(5)). Police must help detainees contact a lawyer and may prioritise lawyers with security clearances when suggesting counsel (s 34(3)-(5)).
Judicial review and remedy. Detainees may apply to the Supreme Court for revocation or variation with leave (s 16), and proceedings for remedies are permitted (s 49). The Court may order disclosure of material that was before the decision-maker subject to national security limits (s 49(2)-(3)). The Supreme Court may declare police-made orders void and award compensation if a police order was so unreasonable that no senior officer acting reasonably could have made it (s 7(11)-(12)).
These duties and rights create a statutory interface where police must follow procedural form, provide specific information and access to advisers, and are constrained by oversight and reporting obligations, while detainees have targeted but limited entitlements to information, legal advice and complaints processes. Several statutory penalties attach to failures to comply and to unauthorised disclosures (ss 38, 42, 45).
Penalties and enforcement
The Act deploys both criminal penalties and civil enforcement mechanisms, and it organises who may exercise coercive powers and how compliance is policed.
Criminal offences and sanctions:
Disclosure offences. Section 38 creates multiple disclosure offences across different actors, each carrying a maximum penalty of up to five years imprisonment:
The detainee who intentionally discloses the existence of the order, that they are detained, or that a prohibited contact order exists, while detained, where not entitled to do so under ss 33, 34 or 36 (s 38(1)).
Lawyers who intentionally disclose those matters or information given to them in the course of contact, except for enumerated purposes such as court proceedings, Ombudsman complaints or representations to the nominated senior police officer (s 38(2)).
Parents or guardians who intentionally disclose prohibited information where the recipient is someone the detainee is prohibited from contacting, with enumerated exceptions (s 38(3)).
Interpreters (s 38(5)), disclosure recipients who onward disclose (s 38(6)), and monitors (police or interpreters who monitor lawyer communications) who disclose monitored communications (s 38(7)).
Offences for contravening safeguards. Section 42(1) creates a two-year maximum imprisonment offence for doing or omitting acts contrary to selected safeguard provisions, including failure to explain the effect of an order (s 26(1)), failure to inform of extensions (s 27), failure to assist to contact a lawyer (s 34), prohibited questioning (s 39(1)-(2)), taking identification material contrary to s 40(1), or using identification material contrary to s 41(2). Section 42(2) creates a five-year maximum penalty for contravening the humane treatment obligation in s 30.
False or misleading information in applications. Section 45 penalises a police officer who gives information known to be false or misleading, or produces a document known to be false unless corrected, with a penalty of up to 12 months imprisonment.
Failure to provide name/address. Under s 20(2), a person who refuses to provide name/address when lawfully requested faces a fine not exceeding 20 penalty units. A police officer who refuses to identify themselves or gives false details when asked faces a fine not exceeding 5 penalty units (s 20(4)).
Enforcement and remedial pathways:
Judicial nullification and compensation. The Supreme Court may declare a police-made preventative detention order void ab initio if the making was so unreasonable that no senior police officer acting reasonably could have made it, and may order State compensation for loss or damage sustained as a direct and reasonable consequence of detention (s 7(11)-(12)). The public account is appropriated for payment (s 7(12)).
Revocation and variation. Police must apply for revocation or variation when grounds cease or change (s 17(1)-(2)); the Court may revoke or vary on application by detainee with leave (s 16). The nominated senior police officer must ensure s 17 compliance (s 18(9)(b)).
Administrative oversight and reporting. The Minister must prepare an annual report covering numbers of orders, applications, periods of detention, complaints to the Ombudsman and decisions invalidating orders (s 51). The Ombudsman has named access as a contact and oversight avenue (s 26(2)(f); s 33), and the Act does not affect Ombudsman functions (s 47).
Operational enforcement powers:
Powers to detain, enter premises and search. While an order is in force any police officer may take the person into custody and detain them (s 18(1)). Police may use reasonable force to enter premises to search for and take the subject into custody (s 21). The police possess search powers (ordinary searches, strip searches under conditions) while detaining a person under the order (s 22).
Treatment safeguards. Section 30 imposes a duty to treat detainees with humanity and respect for dignity and prohibits cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, with a five-year maximum penalty under s 42(2) for contravention.
Information control and secrecy:
Closed court proceedings and suppression. Supreme Court proceedings in connection with applications for or variations of orders must be heard without the public, and the Court may suppress publication as necessary (s 50).
National security exclusions. Summaries and disclosure to courts or parties need not include information where disclosure is likely to prejudice national security, as within the National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 (Cth) (s 29(2); s 49(3)).
Overall, the Act combines criminal penalties to deter and punish disclosure and procedural breaches, statutory duties to police to apply and monitor orders, and judicial routes for invalidation and compensation where police action is found unreasonable.
How it interacts with other laws
The Act contains multiple express cross-references and carve-outs that govern interaction with Commonwealth statutes, State corrections law, and administrative arrangements.
Commonwealth criminal and national security statutes:
Corresponding preventative detention law and Commonwealth Criminal Code. The Act defines "corresponding preventative detention law" to include Division 105 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code and laws of other States or Territories declared by regulation if they correspond to this Act (s 3). It also expressly uses terminology that maps to the Commonwealth Criminal Code for "terrorist act" and "Commonwealth control order" (s 3).
ASIO warrants. Section 23 governs interaction with warrants under s 34E of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979 (Cth). If an ASIO warrant is in force in relation to a person detained under a preventative detention order and a copy of the warrant is supplied to the detaining police officer, the officer must take necessary steps to enable dealing with the person under the warrant (s 23(1)-(3)). Release from the preventative detention order for questioning under an ASIO warrant does not extend the preventative detention period (s 23(4)).
National Security Information Act. Section 29(2) and s 49(3) displace disclosure obligations where information disclosure is likely to prejudice national security, invoking the National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 (Cth) framework for withholding information.
Crimes Act and other Commonwealth detention regimes. Section 24(3)(c) contemplates release from preventative detention to be dealt with under Division 4 of Part IAA or Part IC of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) where relevant.
Corrections Act and prison regime:
Prison transfers and Corrections Act modifications. Section 25 sets out the process for requesting the Director of Corrective Services to authorise transfer to prison and then treats the preventative detention order as authorising detention in prison. It expressly adapts application of the Corrections Act 1997 by specifying that certain sections and regulations of that Act and its Regulations do not apply to detention of persons under the preventative detention order (s 25(6)(a)-(f)). It also makes the senior police officer who requested transfer the police officer for purposes of Parts 4 and 5 while the person is in prison (s 25(5)(c)).
Prison visits and communications. Section 25(7)-(8) allows visitors to the detained person in prison to do so in accordance with procedures determined by the Director of Corrective Services and the police officer exercising authority, and notes AFP members may enter a prison in connection with corresponding preventative detention laws.
State administrative law and Ombudsman:
Ombudsman Act 1978. The detainee’s right to complain to the Ombudsman is set out in s 26(2)(f), and the Act expressly does not affect the Ombudsman’s functions (s 47).
Administrative Arrangements Act. Until administrative arrangements are changed under s 4 of the Administrative Arrangements Act 1990, administration is assigned to the Minister for Justice and Industrial Relations (s 53).
Legal privilege and court practice:
Legal professional privilege. The Act expressly does not affect legal professional privilege (s 48). Court proceedings are civil in nature (s 44(1)), but the Act excludes the ordinary civil practice and procedure rules in prosecutions under it (s 44(2)) and subjects proceedings to the Commonwealth National Security Information Act (s 44(3)).
Closed proceedings and publication. Section 50 mandates hearing in absence of the public for Supreme Court matters connected with applications for orders, and authorises suppression directions.
Other State/Territory laws:
Corresponding laws and double-order constraints. The Act recognises orders under corresponding laws in other jurisdictions, and prevents overlapping applications for the same relevant period or act unless based on new information (s 13).
Regulations and delegated instruments:
Regulations may declare corresponding laws and authorise matters to be determined by persons specified in regulations (s 3(c)(ii); s 52).
The statutory text therefore builds a bridge between State preventative detention powers and Commonwealth national security and detention frameworks, while modifying prison law application and maintaining oversight channels under Ombudsman and judicial review, subject to national security exclusions.
Amendment history
All amendments referred to in the text are self-contained in the Act excerpts and show discrete insertions, repeals and effective dates. The text includes inline amendment markers. Key amendment features visible in the source text:
Multiple amendments effective 13 October 2015. Several definitions and procedural provisions were amended by an instrument identified as No. 36 of 2015 with multiple section markers across the Act. Examples include:
Amendments to definitions in s 3: addition of AFP member, ASIO affiliate, ASIO employee, Commonwealth control order, Commonwealth Criminal Code, corresponding preventative detention law and terrorist act references (s 3(1), multiple amending notes).
Changes to application and content requirements in s 5, s 6, s 7, s 8, s 9, s 11, s 14, s 15, s 22, s 29 and other sections, with annotations indicating amendments by No. 36 of 2015 and applied 13 Oct 2015 (for example ss 5(1) amended by s 6 of No. 36/2015; s 6(1) amended by s 7 of No. 36/2015; s 7(1) amended by s 8 of No. 36/2015; s 8 amended by s 9 of No. 36/2015).
Insertions allowing oral or electronic applications in urgent circumstances with verification requirements and record-keeping duties for oral applications (s 6(1A)-(1C); s 6(1B), (4A), (7); equivalent provisions in ss 14 and 15).
Additions to monitoring and contact provisions affecting interpreters and ASIO-related constraints (s 36(2)(vi) amended by No. 36/2015).
Amendments effective 1 March 2007 by No. 43 of 2006. These inserts added, among others:
Specific entitlement to contact persons describable under s 26(3) and additions to the duty to inform detainees (s 26(3)-(4)).
Reporting obligations and the requirement to include particulars of prohibited contact orders and numbers in the annual report (s 51(2)(e)-(f)).
Insertion of the verified assistance and admissibility protections relating to lawyer contact (s 34(3A); s 35(5)).
Amendment effective 26 June 2008 by No. 18 of 2008. It adjusted s 24(3) to add release for ASIO warrants as a circumstance where the written release statement requirement does not apply.
Amendment effective 1 July 2019 by No. 4 of 2017. It modified s 7(12) to ensure the public account appropriation for compensation (annotation in s 7(12)).
Amendment effective 23 December 2025 by No. 25 of 2025. It updated the sunset provision in s 54 to set the expiry date for applications and orders at 31 December 2030 and to ensure any orders in force on that date cease to have effect at end of that day (s 54(1)-(2) annotation). The text shows this amendment applied 23 Dec 2025.
A 2007 insertion also added lawyer and privilege definitions and other procedural detail (s 3's "lawyer" definition inserted by No. 66 of 2007, schedule 1).
The Act also contains a repeal note for s 4, recorded as repealed by No. 36 of 2015 (s 4 Repealed).
The source text itself includes the amendment identifiers and applied dates inline with each provision. The visible pattern is iterative refinement of procedural safeguards, contact rules, and cross-references to Commonwealth national security instruments. The most recent substantive temporal constraint in the provided text is the sunset amendment inserted by No. 25 of 2025 that fixes the regime to expire at end 31 December 2030 (s 54 as amended).
Litigation history
The source text supplied contains no case law or judicial decisions beyond the Act provisions themselves. It does, however, provide procedural hooks for litigation and judicial remedies which practitioners would mobilise in litigation:
The Supreme Court's remedial role. The Act expressly permits proceedings to review the application for, or the making of, a preventative detention order or prohibited contact order and to seek remedies in relation to the treatment of a person detained under an order (s 49(1)). The Court may order the Commissioner of Police to produce the information that was put before the Supreme Court or the senior police officer when the application for the order was made, subject to national security exclusions (s 49(2)-(3)).
Voidness and compensation. The Supreme Court may declare a police-made order void from the beginning if it finds that the making of the order was so unreasonable that no senior police officer acting reasonably could have made it, and may award compensation for loss or damage directly and reasonably resulting from the detention (s 7(11)-(12)).
Civil character and evidentiary standard. Proceedings under the Act are civil in nature (s 44(1)); questions of fact in court applications are to be decided on the balance of probabilities (s 43). However, the Court’s civil practice rules do not apply, and the National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 (Cth) applies (s 44(2)-(3)). The Supreme Court proceedings specified in s 50 are to be held in camera and suppression of publication is permissible.
Disclosure limitations. The Act permits non-disclosure of material likely to prejudice national security both in summaries given to detainees (s 29(2)) and in court disclosure orders (s 49(3)), creating a litigation environment where national security claims will shape discovery and evidence handling.
Lawyer-client communications. Section 35(5) makes communications between the detainee and their lawyer for specified purposes inadmissible against the detainee in court or tribunal proceedings, directly affecting evidence strategies.
Administrative remedies. The Act preserves the Ombudsman’s functions and the detainee's right to complain to the Ombudsman (s 26(2)(f); s 47). The annual report and Ombudsman referrals are likely sources of administrative records that litigants could rely on.
Because the provided statute text contains no reported judgments or appellate history, readers must look to court files and reported decisions outside this text for litigation outcomes. The Act, as drafted, creates the specific in-court and out-of-court processes that would generate litigation: urgent applications, interim orders, reviews of police orders, compensation claims, and disclosure disputes constrained by national security rules.
Gotchas
The statute includes several operational details and drafting features that create practical traps if not closely followed. These are direct consequences of the Act’s text rather than policy judgments.
Urgent oral or electronic applications require justification. Although the Act allows oral or electronic applications in urgent circumstances (s 6(1B); ss 14(2B), 15(2B)), the Supreme Court or relevant senior police officer must not make the order unless satisfied that it was necessary to rely on that route (s 6(1C); s 14(2C); s 15(2C)). If an applicant relies on urgency but the Court later finds that urgency was not necessary, the order may be vulnerable.
Written and sworn applications are generally required. Except in urgent circumstances, the application must be in writing and sworn (s 6(1A)-(4)). Subsections also require the applicant to set out prior control order history and corresponding preventative detention orders (s 6(1)(e)-(f)). Failure to include these particulars may be procedural non-compliance.
Short statutory time frames and careful counting rules. The timing of detention is governed by precise limits: police-made orders may not exceed 24 hours (s 9(1)), interim Court orders 48 hours (s 9(3)), and Supreme Court orders a maximum of 14 days less any periods already spent detained under relevant orders (s 8(3); s 9(2)). Extensions are possible under s 11 but must respect the maximum in s 9(2). Miscounting or failing to apply the subtraction rule in s 9(2) could render a detention period unlawful.
Identification material safeguards for minors and incapable persons. A magistrate order is needed to take identification material other than fingerprints, handprints, footprints or toeprints from persons under 18 or incapable of managing affairs (s 40(4)-(6)). Section 40 has detailed consent and presence requirements; procedural slips here create criminal and civil exposure.
Contact will be monitored and therefore confidentiality is limited. Contact with family, lawyers and others while detained can occur only if the content and meaning can be effectively monitored (s 35(1)). Lawyer communications for specified purposes are not admissible as evidence (s 35(5)), but monitoring raises privilege and confidentiality issues that must be managed in practice.
Narrow lawyer contact purpose. Section 34 limits the purposes for which a detainee may contact a lawyer. That entitlement does not extend to general legal advice beyond the specified purposes, which affects broader legal assistance strategies.
Disclosure offences reach many actors and extend beyond initial disclosures. Section 38 criminalises intentional disclosure by detainees, lawyers, interpreters, parents/guardians and monitors, and creates secondary liability for those who receive and then intentionally disclose information (s 38(6)). The offence elements include temporality (must occur while the person is being detained) and purpose exceptions. Misunderstanding these elements could entangle advisers and family members.
National security carve-outs limit information access. Summaries and court disclosure obligations do not require disclosure if it would prejudice national security within the meaning of the Commonwealth National Security Information Act (s 29(2); s 49(3)). That creates evidential and procedural complexity in later challenges.
Closed proceedings and publication suppression. Supreme Court proceedings connected with applications must be in camera and publication may be suppressed (s 50), limiting public scrutiny and complicating media or third-party oversight.
False or misleading information by police is an offence but the standard and enforcement depend on proof. Section 45 criminalises false or misleading information in applications to a senior police officer with imprisonment up to 12 months. The provisions require knowledge and materiality; but practitioners should note that the provision is directed only at police and applies specifically in connection with applications to a senior police officer.
Sunset of regime creates timing constraints. No application may be made after 31 December 2030 and any orders in force that day cease at end of that day (s 54). Practitioners must be alert to the regime’s fixed temporal termination.
Each of these practical points is grounded in specific sections. In practice, compliance attention to application content, oral application justification, counting detention time correctly, managing monitored communications, and obtaining proper magistrate authorisations for identification material is essential.
How to comply
Compliance requires coordinated legal, operational and record-keeping steps tied precisely to statutory text. Below are practical, source-grounded steps, with section references, for police, legal advisers and custodial staff.
Before applying for an order
Ensure authorisation. Confirm the applicant is an authorised police officer under s 3(1) and that the Commissioner has appointed the officer or class under s 3(2).
Identify correct legal basis. Match the facts to the statutory grounds in s 5(1) and s 7(1): imminent terrorist act expected within 14 days (s 5(2); s 7(2)) or a terrorist act within the last 28 days where detention is reasonably necessary to preserve evidence (s 5(1)(b); s 7(1)(b)).
Check prior control orders and corresponding orders. Compile and include the outcomes and particulars of any prior preventative detention, Commonwealth control orders or variations/revocations related to the subject as required by s 6(1)(e)-(f) and s 6(1)(f).
Prepare written, sworn application where possible. As a default, prepare the application in writing, sworn if made in writing or by electronic means (s 6(1); s 6(4)). Reserve oral/electronic routes for genuine urgencies where the applicant can justify necessity later (s 6(1B)-(1C); s 6(4A), (7)).
Making the application and judicial process
Content requirements. Include identity particulars (true name, alias or description), full factual grounds, period sought and any available information about age or capacity (s 6(1)(a)-(d)). For repeat applications during the same period, clearly identify newly available information (s 6(2)-(3)).
Interim orders. If applying without notice to the person and the Court deems it desirable, expect the possibility of an interim order limited to 48 hours (s 7(4)-(5); s 9(3)). Ensure the applicant is ready to resume the hearing at the time specified and to give notice to the person and their lawyer if known (s 7(5)(a)-(b)).
Standard of proof and procedure. Prepare to discharge factual assertions on the balance of probabilities (s 43); expect that civil practice rules will not apply (s 44(2)), and that proceedings will be in camera (s 50).
Execution and custody
Taking into custody. Any police officer may take a person into custody under an order in force; use powers equivalent to an apprehension under the Criminal Code for purposes of taking custody or preventing escape (s 18(1)-(2)). Ensure any involved officers understand that certain powers in the Act supersede the general provision (s 18(3)).
Endorsement and notification. Endorse the order with the date, time and place when the person was first taken into custody as soon as practicable (s 19). Provide the detainee with a copy of the order, any prohibited contact order and a summary of grounds as soon as practicable, subject to national security limitations (s 29(1)-(2)). If the detainee requests copies for a lawyer, arrange delivery promptly and endorse the copy with the custody particulars (s 29(5)-(9)).
Informing the detainee. Inform the detained person, as soon as practicable, of the matters in s 26(2), including the right to contact the Ombudsman and to seek a court remedy, entitlement to contact a lawyer and the name and telephone number of the nominated senior police officer (s 26(1)-(2); s 26(3)-(4)).
Nominated senior police officer. The Commissioner must nominate an officer of commander rank or above who was not involved in the application to oversee exercise of powers, ensure s 17 compliance and receive representations (s 18(7)-(10)). Make that nomination promptly and provide the detainee with the nominated officer’s contact (s 26(2)(i)).
Contact, legal assistance and monitoring
Lawyer contact. Facilitate the detainee’s contact with a lawyer for specified purposes (s 34(1)-(2)). If the detainee requests a particular lawyer who is the subject of a prohibited contact order or otherwise not available, provide reasonable assistance to choose another lawyer (s 34(3)).
Monitoring. Ensure all contact under s 32 or s 34 is conducted so that content and meaning can be effectively monitored by police (s 35(1)). Arrange interpreters where necessary, including telephone interpreters, and note that interpreters may be police officers (s 28(3)-(4); s 35(2)-(4)). For non-English contact, prioritize arranging appropriate interpreters as soon as practicable when the detainee requests it (s 35(4); s 36(10)).
Confidentiality and privilege. Recognise that communications between detainee and lawyer for the purposes in s 34 are not admissible against the detainee (s 35(5)). However, inform detainee and third parties of disclosure offences in s 38 and ensure monitors and interpreters are aware of the criminal prohibitions.
Searches and identification material
Searches. Conduct ordinary searches when reasonable grounds exist to suspect seizable items or evidence are being carried (s 22(2)). Conduct strip searches only where necessary, urgency justifies it, and with same-sex officers present; report use of force within seven days (s 22(3), (5)).
Taking identification material. For most adults, a sergeant or above may take identification material with consent or where necessary to confirm identity (s 40(2)). For persons under 18 or incapable, obtain written consent or a magistrate order for non-routine material, observe presence requirement of a parent/guardian or appropriate person, and respect the statutory test and safeguards (s 40(4)-(10)). Destroy identification material after 12 months unless proceedings are brought or ongoing (s 41(4)).
Review, revocation and extensions
Revocation/varying. Apply promptly to the Supreme Court or a senior police officer to revoke or vary an order if grounds cease or new circumstances arise (s 17(1)-(3)). If the detainee seeks variation or revocation, apply for leave under s 16 and be prepared to demonstrate new facts or circumstances.
Extension applications. For Court-made orders, authorised police may apply for extensions in writing, sworn, setting out grounds and prior outcomes (s 11(1)-(3)). Give notice of applications to the detainee and make arrangements for their appearance (s 11(4)-(5)). Ensure extensions respect the maximum permissible period under s 9(2).
Record-keeping, reporting and oversight
Documentation and audio-visual records. If applications are oral, ensure an audio or audio-visual record is made or a written record produced as soon as practicable (s 6(7); s 14(9); s 15(7)). Keep clear records of reasons, search reports, strip search force reports and interpreter use.
Annual reporting. The Minister must prepare an annual report with specific metrics on orders, applications, duration of detention, complaints to Ombudsman and invalidated orders (s 51). Operational data should be compiled for that purpose.
Legal risk management
Criminal and civil risks. Be aware of disclosure offences under s 38, the offence for false or misleading material by police in s 45, and contraventions of safeguard provisions under s 42. Maintain procedures to avoid contraventions and to document decisions justifying urgency, necessity and reasonableness.
National security claims. Where evidence or parts of summaries may prejudice national security, follow the National Security Information Act procedures and be prepared to invoke s 29(2) and s 49(3) protections.
Following these source-specified steps and cross-referencing the relevant sections will reduce legal risk and ensure actions align with the statutory regime.
(a) [Section 3 Subsection (1) amended by No. 36 of 2015, s. 4, Applied:13 Oct 2015] Division 105 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code; or
(b) a law of another State or of a Territory, or particular provisions of a law of another State or of a Territory, that –
(i) corresponds or correspond to this Act; or
(ii) is or are declared by the regulations to correspond to this Act;
Director of Corrective Services has the same meaning as in the Corrections Act 1997 ;
identification material, in relation to a person, means samples taken from a part of the person's body from which a DNA profile may be derived, prints of the person's hands, fingers, feet or toes, recordings of the person's voice, samples of the person's handwriting or photographs (including video recordings) of the person;
interim preventative detention order means an interim preventative detention order made by the Supreme Court under section 7 ;
[Section 3 Subsection (1) amended by No. 66 of 2007, Sched. 1, Applied:31 Dec 2008]lawyer means an Australian legal practitioner;
premises includes –
(a) land; and
(b) a building or vehicle; and
(c) a part of a building or vehicle; and
(d) any place, whether built on or not;
prescribed authority has the same meaning as in Division 3 of Part III of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979 of the Commonwealth;
preventative detention order means an order made under section 7 , as varied under section 16 or 17 , and includes an interim preventative detention order;
prison has the same meaning as in the Corrections Act 1997 ;
prohibited contact order means an order made under section 14 or 15 , as varied under section 16 or 17 ;
seizable item means anything that –
(a) could present a danger to a person; or
(b) could be used to assist a person to escape from lawful custody; or
(c) could be used to contact another person or to operate a device remotely;
senior police officer means a police officer of or above the rank of Assistant Commissioner;
[Section 3 Subsection (1) amended by No. 36 of 2015, s. 4, Applied:13 Oct 2015]
[Section 3 Subsection (1) amended by No. 36 of 2015, s. 4, Applied:13 Oct 2015]terrorist act has the same meaning as in Part 5.3 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code;
thing includes any object, article or material;
vehicle means any thing capable of transporting people or things by air, road, rail or water, regardless of how the thing is moved or propelled.
(2) The Commissioner of Police may appoint in writing police officers, or a class or classes of police officers, to be authorised police officers for the purpose of making applications under sections 5 , 15 and 17 .
(3) A note in the text of this Act does not form part of this Act.
4.
[Section 4 Repealed by No. 36 of 2015, s. 5, Applied:13 Oct 2015]
Part 2 Preventative Detention Orders
Part 2 Preventative Detention Orders
5 Application for preventative detention order
5 Application for preventative detention order
(1) An authorised police officer (the "applicant") may apply to the Supreme Court or, subject to subsection (3) , to a senior police officer for a preventative detention order in relation to a person (the "subject") if –
(a) [Section 5 Subsection (1) amended by No. 36 of 2015, s. 6, Applied:13 Oct 2015] the applicant suspects on reasonable grounds that –
(i) [Section 5 Subsection (1) amended by No. 36 of 2015, s. 6, Applied:13 Oct 2015] the subject –
(A) will engage in a terrorist act; or
(B) possesses or has under his or her control (whether solely or jointly with any other person) a thing that is connected with the preparation for, or the engagement of a person in, a terrorist act; or
(C) has done an act in preparation for, or planning, a terrorist act; and
(ii) making the order would substantially assist in preventing a terrorist act occurring; and
(iii) detaining the subject for the period for which the applicant is seeking to have him or her detained under the order is reasonably necessary for the purpose referred to in subparagraph (ii) ; or
(b) the applicant is satisfied that –
(i) a terrorist act has occurred within the last 28 days; and
(ii) [Section 5 Subsection (1) amended by No. 36 of 2015, s. 6, Applied:13 Oct 2015] it is reasonably necessary to detain the subject to preserve evidence of, or relating to, the terrorist act; and
(iii) detaining the subject for the period for which the applicant is seeking to have him or her detained under the order is reasonably necessary for the purpose referred to in subparagraph (ii) .
(2) A terrorist act referred to in subsection (1)(a) must be one –
(a) that is imminent; and
(b) that is expected to occur, in any event, at some time in the next 14 days.
(3) An application may only be made to a senior police officer if the applicant considers that –
(a) there is an urgent need for the order; and
(b) it is not reasonably practicable in the circumstances for the application to be made to the Supreme Court.
6 Form and content of application
6 Form and content of application
(1) An application under section 5 must –
(a) [Section 6 Subsection (1) amended by No. 36 of 2015, s. 7, Applied:13 Oct 2015] set out –
(i) the true name of the person in relation to whom the preventative detention order is sought (the subject); or
(ii) if, after reasonable inquiries have been made, the subject's true name is not known but an alias is known for the subject, the subject's alias; or
(iii) if, after reasonable inquiries have been made, the subject's true name is not known and no alias is known for the subject, a description sufficient to identify the subject; and
(b) set out the facts and other grounds on which the applicant considers that the preventative detention order should be made; and
(c) [Section 6 Subsection (1) amended by No. 36 of 2015, s. 7, Applied:13 Oct 2015][Section 6 Subsection (1) amended by No. 36 of 2015, s. 7, Applied:13 Oct 2015] specify the period for which the applicant is seeking to have the subject detained under the preventative detention order and set out the facts and other grounds on which the applicant considers that the subject should be detained for that period; and
(d) [Section 6 Subsection (1) amended by No. 36 of 2015, s. 7, Applied:13 Oct 2015] set out the information (if any) that the applicant has about the subject's age and capacity to manage his or her affairs; and
(e) set out the following:
(i) [Section 6 Subsection (1) amended by No. 36 of 2015, s. 7, Applied:13 Oct 2015] the outcomes and particulars of all previous applications for preventative detention orders in relation to the subject;
(ii) the information (if any) that the applicant has about –
(A) [Section 6 Subsection (1) amended by No. 36 of 2015, s. 7, Applied:13 Oct 2015] the outcomes and particulars of all previous requests for Commonwealth control orders (including the outcomes of the hearings to confirm the orders) in relation to the subject; and
(B) [Section 6 Subsection (1) amended by No. 36 of 2015, s. 7, Applied:13 Oct 2015] the outcomes and particulars of all previous applications for variations of Commonwealth control orders made in relation to the subject; and
(C) [Section 6 Subsection (1) amended by No. 36 of 2015, s. 7, Applied:13 Oct 2015] the outcomes of all previous applications for revocations of Commonwealth control orders made in relation to the subject; and
(f) [Section 6 Subsection (1) amended by No. 36 of 2015, s. 7, Applied:13 Oct 2015] set out the information (if any) that the applicant has about any periods for which the subject has been detained under an order made under a corresponding preventative detention law.
(1A) [Section 6 Subsection (1A) inserted by No. 36 of 2015, s. 7, Applied:13 Oct 2015] Subject to subsection (1B) , an application under section 5 must be made in writing (other than writing by means of an electronic communication).
(1B) [Section 6 Subsection (1B) inserted by No. 36 of 2015, s. 7, Applied:13 Oct 2015] If the applicant considers it necessary to do so because of urgent circumstances, an application under section 5 may be made –
(a) orally, either in person or by telephone; or
(b) by fax, email or other means of electronic communication.
(1C) [Section 6 Subsection (1C) inserted by No. 36 of 2015, s. 7, Applied:13 Oct 2015] If subsection (1B) applies, the Supreme Court or relevant senior police officer must not make the preventative detention order unless satisfied that, because of urgent circumstances, it was necessary for the applicant to rely on that subsection.
(2) If –
(a) a preventative detention order is made in relation to a person on the basis of assisting in preventing a terrorist act occurring within a particular period; and
(b) the person is taken into custody under the order; and
(c) an application is made for another preventative detention order in relation to the person on the basis of assisting in preventing a different terrorist act occurring within that period –
the application must also identify the information on which the application is based that became available only after the preventative detention order referred to in paragraph (a) was made.
(3) If –
(a) an order for a person’s detention is made under a corresponding preventative detention law on the basis of assisting in preventing a terrorist act occurring within a particular period; and
(b) the person is taken into custody under that order; and
(c) an application is made for a preventative detention order in relation to the person on the basis of assisting in preventing a different terrorist act occurring within that period –
the application must also identify the information on which the application is based that became available only after the order referred to in paragraph (a) was made.
(4) [Section 6 Subsection (4) amended by No. 36 of 2015, s. 7, Applied:13 Oct 2015] If the application is made in writing, or by fax, email or other means of electronic communication, it must be sworn by the applicant.
| Note: Section 45 creates an offence for providing false or misleading information or documents in connection with an application to a senior police officer. |
(4A) [Section 6 Subsection (4A) inserted by No. 36 of 2015, s. 7, Applied:13 Oct 2015] If the application is made orally, the information given by the applicant to the Supreme Court or relevant senior police officer in connection with the application must be verified or given on oath or affirmation unless the Court or officer is satisfied that in the circumstances it is not practical to administer an oath or affirmation to the applicant.
(5) An application to a senior police officer may be made without notice of it being given to the person in relation to whom a preventative detention order is being sought.
(6) An application to th
This is an opening excerpt, not the complete document.