1Shop Theft (Alternative Enforcement) Act 2000

South Australia Shop Theft (Alternative Enforcement) Act 2000 An Act to provide for certain persons accused of minor shop theft to be subject to a non‑curial enforcement process with their consent as an alternative to prosecution; and for other purposes.

Contents 1 Short title 3 Interpretation 4 Issue of shop theft infringement notice 5 Consent to being dealt with under Act—goods valued at or below the prescribed amount 6 Consent to being dealt with under Act—goods valued at more than the prescribed amount 7 Failure to effectively consent 8 Withdrawal of consent 9 Alleged offender to be provided with copy of notice and caution 10 Information to be provided to victim 11 Community service 12 Breach of undertaking specified in notice 13 No prosecution if effective consent given 14 Failure to issue notice or allow effective consent not to be raised in proceedings 15 Inadmissibility of evidence of consent etc 16 Commissioner to keep records 17 Confidentiality 18 Commissioner's annual report to contain information relating to notices Schedule 1—Shop theft infringement notice—goods valued at or below the prescribed amount Schedule 2—Shop theft infringement notice—goods valued at more than the prescribed amount Schedule 3—Provisions relating to community service 1 Interpretation 2 Application of Correctional Services Act 1982 3 Special provisions relating to community service 4 Chief Executive must assign community corrections officer 5 Community corrections officer may give reasonable directions 6 Extension of period for performance of community service 7 Waiver of community service requirement on notification by Chief Executive 8 Waiver of unperformed hours of community service on application 9 Increase in hours on default in performance of community service 10 Breach of undertaking to be reported to Commissioner of Police 11 Evidentiary Legislative history

The Parliament of South Australia enacts as follows: 1—Short title This Act may be cited as the Shop Theft (Alternative Enforcement) Act 2000. 3—Interpretation (1) In this Act— community corrections officer means a person who is a community corrections officer within the meaning of the Sentencing Act 2017; CPI means the Consumer Price Index (All Groups) for the City of Adelaide published by the Australian Bureau of Statistics; minor shop theft means theft of goods valued at or below the prescribed upper limit from a shop; prescribed amount means— (a) if no amount is prescribed by regulation in accordance with subsection (3)—$30; or (b) if an amount is prescribed by regulation in accordance with subsection (3)—that amount; prescribed upper limit means— (a) if no amount is prescribed by regulation in accordance with subsection (3)—$150; or (b) if an amount is prescribed by regulation in accordance with subsection (3)—that amount; sale includes hire; shop includes any place where goods are displayed for sale; victim of an alleged offence of minor shop theft means the proprietor of the business in the course of which the goods in question were displayed for sale or an agent of the proprietor. (2) For the purposes of this Act, the value of any goods the subject of an allegation of theft from a shop will be taken to be— (a) the retail price (or the lowest retail price) of the goods at the shop on the day on which the alleged theft took place; or (b) if, on the day on which the alleged theft took place, the goods do not have a retail price at the shop—the amount that would be the cost to the victim of replacing the goods on that day. (3) The regulations may prescribe an amount for the purposes of the definition of prescribed amount or prescribed upper limit, provided that an amount prescribed must not exceed— (a) in the case of the prescribed amount—$30 adjusted by the percentage variation (to two decimal points) between the CPI for the quarter immediately preceding the commencement of this section and the CPI for the quarter immediately preceding the making of the regulation and rounded to the nearest dollar; (b) in the case of the prescribed upper limit—$150 adjusted by the percentage variation (to two decimal points) between the CPI for the quarter immediately preceding the commencement of this section and the CPI for the quarter immediately preceding the making of the regulation and rounded to the nearest dollar. 4—Issue of shop theft infringement notice (1) If a police officer is satisfied that— (a) an allegation of theft made against a person constitutes an allegation of minor shop theft; and (b) the alleged offender— (i) is aged 18 years or over; and (ii) is not an employee of the victim; and (c) the victim consents to the alleged offender's being dealt with under this Act; and (d) there is no reason to suspect that the alleged theft is part of a pattern of behaviour on the part of the alleged offender or an organised scheme involving the alleged offender; and (e) there is sufficient evidence on which a court could reasonably find the alleged offender guilty of the alleged theft, the police officer may, instead of charging the alleged offender with theft, issue a shop theft infringement notice to the alleged offender. (2) If a victim consents to an alleged offender being dealt with under this Act, that consent cannot be withdrawn. (3) A shop theft infringement notice issued to an alleged offender must— (a) if the goods the subject of the allegation are valued at or below the prescribed amount—be in the form set out in Schedule 1; or (b) if the goods the subject of the allegation are valued at more than the prescribed amount—be in the form set out in Schedule 2. (4) When a police officer issues a shop theft infringement notice to an alleged offender, the police officer must read to the alleged offender the information contained in Part B of the notice. 5—Consent to being dealt with under Act—goods valued at or below the prescribed amount An alleged offender who has been issued with a shop theft infringement notice relating to goods valued at or below the prescribed amount effectively consents to being dealt with under this Act if— (a) immediately following the issue of the notice— (i) the alleged offender apologises to the victim at the shop, in the presence of a police officer (unless the victim indicates that he or she does not want to receive an apology); and (ii) if the goods are no longer in the condition in which they were displayed for sale because of the actions of the alleged offender—the alleged offender, in the presence of a police officer, pays the victim the value of the goods; and (iii) the alleged offender completes and signs the statement contained in Part C of the notice— (A) admitting the commission of the offence described in the notice; and (B) undertaking to submit to a caution against further offending to be administered by a police officer; and (iv) a police officer confirms that it is appropriate that the alleged offender be dealt with under this Act by completing and signing Part D of the notice; or (b) within 48 hours after the issue of the notice— (i) the alleged offender personally attends at the police station specified in the notice; and (ii) if the goods are no longer in the condition in which they were displayed for sale because of the actions of the alleged offender—the alleged offender pays the value of the goods to a police officer (which amount must be forwarded to or made available for collection by the victim); and (iii) a police officer specifies in Part C of the notice the day and time at which the alleged offender will be required to apologise to the victim (unless the victim has indicated that he or she does not want to receive an apology); and (iv) the alleged offender completes and signs the statement contained in Part C of the notice— (A) admitting the commission of the offence described in the notice; and (B) undertaking— • to submit to a caution against further offending to be administered by a police officer; and • if applicable, to apologise to the victim at the shop, in the presence of a police officer, on the day and at the time specified in the notice; and (v) a police officer confirms that it is appropriate that the alleged offender be dealt with under this Act by completing and signing Part D of the notice. 6—Consent to being dealt with under Act—goods valued at more than the prescribed amount An alleged offender who has been issued with a shop theft infringement notice relating to goods valued at more than the prescribed amount effectively consents to being dealt with under this Act if, within 48 hours after the issue of the notice— (a) the alleged offender personally attends at the police station specified in the notice; and (b) if the goods are no longer in the condition in which they were displayed for sale because of the actions of the alleged offender—the alleged offender pays the value of the goods to a police officer (which amount must be forwarded to or made available for collection by the victim); and (c) a police officer specifies in Part C of the notice— (i) the day and time at which the alleged offender will be required to apologise to the victim (unless the victim has indicated that he or she does not want to receive an apology); and (ii) the place at which the alleged offender will be required to report to a community corrections officer for the purpose of completing a period of community service; and (d) the alleged offender completes and signs the statement contained in Part C of the notice— (i) admitting the commission of the offence described in the notice; and (ii) undertaking— (A) to submit to a caution against further offending to be administered by a police officer; and (B) if applicable, to apologise to the victim at the shop, in the presence of a police officer, on the day and at the time specified in the notice; and (C) to complete a period of community service specified in the notice (to be calculated at the rate of one hour for every $5, or part thereof, of the value of the goods) within the period of six months after the date on which consent is given; and (D) for the purpose of completing a period of community service— • to report to a community corrections officer at the place specified in the notice not later than two working days after the date on which consent is given; and • to obey the lawful directions of the community corrections officer to whom the alleged offender is assigned; and (e) a police officer confirms that it is appropriate that the alleged offender be dealt with under this Act by completing and signing Part D of the notice. 7—Failure to effectively consent If an alleged offender who has been issued with a shop theft infringement notice does not effectively consent to being dealt with under this Act, the alleged offender may be charged with theft in relation to the allegation the subject of the notice. 8—Withdrawal of consent (1) An alleged offender who has been issued with a shop theft infringement notice relating to goods valued at or below the prescribed amount and effectively consented to being dealt with under this Act immediately following the issue of the notice may withdraw that consent at any time within 48 hours of the issue of the notice by personally attending at the police station specified in the notice and advising a police officer, in writing, that consent is withdrawn. (2) If an alleged offender withdraws consent in accordance with this section, the alleged offender will be treated as if he or she had never effectively consented to being dealt with under this Act. (3) This section does not apply if an alleged offender has paid the victim the value of the goods. 9—Alleged offender to be provided with copy of notice and caution An alleged offender who has been issued with a shop theft infringement notice and effectively consented to being dealt with under this Act must be provided with— (a) a copy of the duly completed and signed shop theft infringement notice; and (b) a notice setting out the words of the caution administered to the alleged offender. 10—Information to be provided to victim If a police officer issues a shop theft infringement notice to an alleged offender, the officer must— (a) ask the victim of the alleged offence whether he or she wishes to be provided with information in relation to the manner in which the alleged offence has been dealt with; and (b) if the victim indicates that he or she does wish to have that information—ensure that the victim is provided with that information. 11—Community service The provisions set out in Schedule 3 apply in relation to the performance of community service in accordance with an undertaking specified in a shop theft infringement notice. 12—Breach of undertaking specified in notice (1) A person who has been issued with a shop theft infringement notice and effectively consented to being dealt with under this Act must not, without reasonable excuse (proof of which lies on the person), breach an undertaking specified in the shop theft infringement notice. Maximum penalty: $1 250 (2) In proceedings for an offence against this section, an apparently genuine document purporting to be a shop theft infringement notice, or a copy of a shop theft infringement notice, issued under this Act and duly completed and signed constitutes, in the absence of proof to the contrary— (a) proof that the person named as the alleged offender in the notice has effectively consented to being dealt with under this Act; and (b) proof of the terms of the undertakings specified in the notice. (3) In proceedings for an offence against this section, an apparently genuine document purporting to be a certificate executed by a community corrections officer performing duties at a specified place certifying that a specified person did not report to a community corrections officer at that place during a specified period constitutes, in the absence of proof to the contrary, proof of the matters so certified. 13—No prosecution if effective consent given A person who has been issued with a shop theft infringement notice and effectively consented to being dealt with under this Act is not liable to prosecution for an offence of theft in relation to the allegation the subject of the notice. 14—Failure to issue notice or allow effective consent not to be raised in proceedings No argument may be put in proceedings before a court on a charge of theft that a shop theft infringement notice should have been issued to the defendant, or that the defendant should have been allowed to effectively consent to being dealt with under this Act, in relation to the allegation the subject of the proceedings. 15—Inadmissibility of evidence of consent etc (1) Subject to subsection (2), the fact that a person who was issued with a shop theft infringement notice admitted committing the offence the subject of the notice by, or for the purposes of, effectively consenting to being dealt with under this Act may not be adduced in evidence or cited or referred to in any proceedings other than by or with the consent of the person. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to— (a) proceedings for an offence against section 12; or (b) disciplinary proceedings against a police officer relating to conduct in connection with the shop theft infringement notice or the issue of the notice. 16—Commissioner to keep records (1) The Commissioner of Police must keep a record of— (a) the name of an alleged offender who has been issued with a shop theft infringement notice under this Act and has effectively consented to being dealt with under this Act; and (b) the details of allegations contained in the notice; and (c) the terms of the undertakings specified in the notice. (2) A record required under this section must be kept for at least five years after the date on which effective consent to being dealt with under this Act was given. 17—Confidentiality (1) A person who is, or has been, engaged in the administration of this Act must not disclose information relating to a shop theft infringement notice or the issue of a shop theft infringement notice obtained (whether by that person or otherwise) in the administration of this Act except— (a) to members of the police force for police record keeping or law enforcement purposes; or (b) to the alleged offender to whom the notice was issued (or to the alleged offender's legal representative); or (c) to the victim of the alleged offence in accordance with section 10; or (d) as required for the purposes of the Police Complaints and Discipline Act 2016; or (e) as required for the purposes of any legal proceedings. Maximum penalty: $10 000. (2) This section does not derogate from section 15. (3) This section does not prevent a person from divulging statistical or other information that could not reasonably be expected to lead to the identification of a person who has been issued with a shop theft infringement notice. 18—Commissioner's annual report to contain information relating to notices (1) The Commissioner of Police must, on or before 30 September in each year, prepare a report on the operation and administration of this Act during the period of 12 months that ended on the preceding 30 June. (2) A report required under this section must be incorporated in the annual report of the Commissioner of Police required under the Police Act 1998. Schedule 1—Shop theft infringement notice—goods valued at or below the prescribed amount