CTHIn ForceLegislation
Public Service Regulations 2023
21Application for review of decision
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 21
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Public Service Regulations 2023.
#### 21 Application for review of decision
(1) A person who is entitled to a review of a decision under this Subdivision may apply directly to the Merit Protection Commissioner for a review of the decision.
(2) The application must:
(a) be in writing; and
(b) state the reasons why the applicant considers that the selection process that resulted in the decision:
(i) was not based on merit (within the meaning of subsection 10A(2) of the Act); or
(ii) was not undertaken in accordance with the requirements for conducting merit‑based selection processes specified by the Commissioner’s Directions; and
(c) be made by:
(i) 5 pm of the 14th day after the day the decision is notified in the Public Service Gazette; or
(ii) if, before the end of that period, the Merit Protection Commissioner agrees to a longer period—5 pm of the last day of that longer period.
(3) The making of an application under this section operates to stay:
(a) the decision; and
(b) if the decision involves the engagement or promotion of a person from a merit pool, a ranked merit pool or a ranked merit list—the engagement or promotion of any other person from the merit pool, ranked merit pool or ranked merit list;
until the decision takes effect in accordance with Part 4 of the Commissioner’s Directions.
(4) The Merit Protection Commissioner may decide that the applicant is not entitled to a review of the decision if:
(a) the application is misconceived, lacking in substance, frivolous or vexatious; or
(b) the applicant has previously applied for:
(i) a review of the same decision; or
(ii) a review of a decision relating to the same selection process; or
(c) the Merit Protection Commissioner considers that, in all the circumstances, a review of the decision is not justified.
> Note: For paragraph (4)(b), an example of a decision relating to the same selection process is a decision to promote a person to a similar vacancy from a merit pool created as a result of that selection process.
(5) If the Merit Protection Commissioner makes a decision under subsection (4), the Merit Protection Commissioner must notify the applicant, by written notice, of the reasons for the decision.