Public Interest Disclosures Act 2002
40Matters that do not have to be investigated
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 40
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Public Interest Disclosures Act 2002.
40 Matters that do not have to be investigated
(1) The Ombudsman may decide not to investigate a disclosed matter –
(a) if in the opinion of the Ombudsman the disclosure is trivial, vexatious, misconceived or lacking in substance; or
(b) if the subject matter of the disclosure has already been adequately dealt with by the Ombudsman or a public body, statutory authority, Commonwealth statutory authority, commission, court or tribunal; or
(c) if the person making the disclosure has commenced proceedings in a commission, court or tribunal in relation to the same matter, and that commission, court or tribunal has power to order remedies similar to those available under this Act; or
(d) [Section 40 Subsection (1) amended by No. 68 of 2009, s. 23, Applied:01 Oct 2010] if the person making the disclosure had knowledge for more than 12 months of the disclosed matter before making the disclosure and failed to give a satisfactory explanation for the delay in making the disclosure; or
(e) [Section 40 Subsection (1) amended by No. 68 of 2009, s. 23, Applied:01 Oct 2010] if the disclosure relates solely to the personal interests of the person making the disclosure; or
(f) [Section 40 Subsection (1) amended by No. 68 of 2009, s. 23, Applied:01 Oct 2010] if the disclosure is based on false or misleading information; or
(g) [Section 40 Subsection (1) amended by No. 68 of 2009, s. 23, Applied:01 Oct 2010] if the matter which is the subject of the disclosure is a matter in respect of which a decision has been made that the matter –
(i) is not a public interest disclosure; or
(ii) is a matter which does not have to be investigated under this Act –
and the additional disclosure does not provide significant or substantial new information.
(2) The Ombudsman must –