96Review by the Administrative Review Tribunal

#### 96 Review by the Administrative Review Tribunal (1) An application may be made to the Administrative Review Tribunal for review of the following decisions of the Commissioner: (a) a decision under subsection 26H(1) not to register an APP code developed by an APP code developer; (b) a decision under subsection 26S(1) not to register a CR code developed by a CR code developer; (ba) a decision under subsection 26WQ(7) to refuse an application for a declaration; (bb) a decision to make a declaration under paragraph 26WQ(1)(d); (bc) a decision under subsection 26WR(1) to give a direction; (c) a decision under subsection 52(1) or (1A) to make a determination; (d) a decision under subsection 73(1A) to dismiss an application; (e) a decision under section 95 to refuse to approve the issue of guidelines; (f) a decision under subsection 95A(2) or (4) or 95AA(2) to refuse to approve guidelines; (g) a decision under subsection 95A(6) to revoke an approval of guidelines. (2) An application under paragraph (1)(a) may only be made by the APP code developer that developed the APP code. (2A) An application under paragraph (1)(ba) may only be made by: (a) the entity that made the application for a declaration; or (b) if another entity’s compliance with subsection 26WL(2) is affected by the decision to refuse the application for a declaration—that other entity. (2B) An application under paragraph (1)(bb) may only be made by: (a) the entity to whom notice of the declaration was given; or (b) if another entity’s compliance with subsection 26WL(2) is affected by the declaration—that other entity. (2C) An application under paragraph (1)(bc) may only be made by the entity to whom the direction was given. (2D) For the purposes of subsections (2A), (2B) and (2C), entity has the same meaning as in Part IIIC. (3) An application under paragraph (1)(b) may only be made by the CR code developer that developed the CR code.