Plant Breeder's Rights Act 1994
40Essential derivation for PBR‑protected varieties—declaration
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 40
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Plant Breeder's Rights Act 1994.
40 Essential derivation for PBR‑protected varieties—declaration
(1) A person (an eligible person) may make an application under subsection (1A) if the person is: (a) the grantee of PBR in a plant variety; or (b) an exclusive licensee of such a grantee. (1A) An eligible person in relation to a plant variety (the initial variety) may apply in writing to the Registrar for a declaration that another variety (the second variety) is essentially derived from the initial variety if: (a) another person is the grantee of, or has applied for, PBR in the second variety; and (b) the eligible person is satisfied that the second variety is essentially derived from the initial variety; and (c) the initial variety has not itself been declared (under section 40 or 41D) to be essentially derived from another variety in which PBR has been granted.
Note 1: If the breeder of the second variety has not applied for, or been granted, PBR in the second variety, an eligible person may apply under section 41A for a declaration that the second variety is essentially derived from the initial variety.
Note 2: If an application for PBR in the second variety is made after an application is made under section 41A in relation to that variety, the application under section 41A may be treated as if it were an application under this section (see section 41F).
(1B) The Registrar must notify the application under subsection (1A) to each eligible person in relation to the initial variety other than the applicant. (1C) If an eligible person in relation to a plant variety (the initial variety) applies for a declaration under subsection (1A) in relation to another plant variety (the second variety), that does not prevent another eligible person in relation to the initial variety also applying for a declaration under that subsection in relation to the second variety. (2) Nothing in this section implies that an eligible person in relation to a plant variety (the initial variety) may not, in relation to an application by another person for PBR in another plant variety (the second variety) that has been accepted but not finally determined: (a) make an objection, under section 35, to the granting of PBR in the second variety; and (b) in the alternative, if PBR is granted to another person in the second variety—apply under subsection (1A) for a declaration that the second variety is essentially derived from the initial variety. (3) If the second variety: (a) is the subject of an application for PBR; and (b) is also the subject of an application for a declaration of essential derivation; then, unless and until the Registrar decides to grant the application for PBR: (c) the Registrar must not make the declaration of essential derivation; but (d) the Registrar may, in his or her discretion: (i) examine both the application for PBR and the application for a declaration of essential derivation at the same time; and (ii) for the purpose only of examining the application for a declaration of essential derivation—treat the applicant for PBR as the grantee of PBR in the variety. (4) An application for a declaration of essential derivation must: (a) be in the approved form; and (b) be accompanied by the prescribed fee in respect of the application. (5) An application must contain such information relevant to establishing a prima facie case that the second variety is an essentially derived variety of the initial variety as is required by the form. (6) If the initial variety has itself been declared to be essentially derived from another variety, the Registrar must: (a) refuse to declare the second variety essentially derived from the initial variety; and (b) notify each eligible person in relation to the initial variety (including the applicant) of the refusal and the reasons for it. (7) If the initial variety has not been so declared, the Registrar must determine, on the basis of the application, whether the Registrar is satisfied that there is a prima facie case that the second variety is an essentially derived variety of the initial variety. (8) If the Registrar is satisfied of that prima facie case, the Registrar must: (a) notify the applicant and the grantee of PBR in the second variety that the Registrar is so satisfied; and (b) notify the grantee of PBR in the second variety that, unless the grantee establishes, within 30 days after being so notified or such longer period as the Registrar allows, that the second variety is not an essentially derived variety of the initial variety, the Registrar will, at the end of that period, declare the second variety to be such an essentially derived variety.