National Transport Commission (Model Act on Heavy Vehicle Speeding Compliance) Regulations 2008
31. Deciding what a person ought reasona31. Deciding what a person ought reasonably to have known
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 31. Deciding what a person ought reasona
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in National Transport Commission (Model Act on Heavy Vehicle Speeding Compliance) Regulations 2008.
31. Deciding what a person ought reasonably to have known
If, in a prosecution for an offence against this Act, it is relevant to prove that someone ought reasonably to have known something, the issue must be decided having regard to – (a) the person’s abilities, experience, expertise, knowledge, qualifications and training; and (b) the circumstances of the offence; and (c) any other matters specified by the regulations for the purposes of this section.