National Recovery Plan for Threatened Albatrosses and Giant Petrels 2011-2016
Evaluation of Performance of Previous PlEvaluation of Performance of Previous Plan
Start here
Get a plain-English read of Evaluation of Performance of Previous Pl
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in National Recovery Plan for Threatened Albatrosses and Giant Petrels 2011-2016.
Evaluation of Performance of Previous Plan
The 2001 Recovery Plan nominated four recovery criteria against which to judge the success of the albatross and giant petrel recovery plan. None of those four criteria can be judged to have been fully met (Table 4).
Table 4: Assessment of recovery criteria in 2001 Recovery Plan.
| Recovery Criteria | Status |
|---|---|
| Incidental bycatch during longline fishing operations is consistent with the criteria specified in the longline fishing threat abatement plan for all albatross and giant petrel species within the AFZ. | Not achieved |
| All human induced threats to albatrosses and giant petrels have been minimised or eliminated. | Not achieved |
| No breeding population within areas under Australian jurisdiction declines due to human activities. | Unknown |
| All albatross and giant petrel breeding populations within areas under Australian jurisdiction that have declined, exhibit a sustained increase in population size. | Not achieved |
The poor outcome of these recovery criteria is due to one or a combination of the following:
- the criteria operate on a time scale beyond the life of the recovery plan;
- the criteria were not practical, e.g. many human induced threats are outside Australian control; and
- longline fishing is no longer the sole major threat facing albatrosses and giant petrels. Land-based threats, as well as other forms of fishing, such as trawl fishing operations, also threaten these species.
The 2001 Recovery Plan identified six specific objectives and a total of forty associated recovery actions. As part of the performance evaluation, each recovery action was assessed according to the performance indicator and scored between 0-3 using the following criteria:
0 No progress / cannot be assessed
1 Insufficient action to meet criteria
2 Action underway – most elements of action met or it is anticipated they will be
3 Criteria met – further action may or may not be required
The individual assessments for each of the forty recovery actions are contained in the background document. The results for the specific objectives are summarised in Table 5.
Table 5: Evaluation of achievement against specific objectives of 2001 Recovery Plan.