Sets criminal offences and enforcement procedures forbidding operation of vessels while alcohol is present (zero tolerance for commercial vessels; 0.05 limit for non‑commercial vessels). It empowers police to require breath tests, breath analyses and blood‑sampling, detain non‑compliant persons and direct vessel movements; owners and persons in charge face fines and courts may disqualify operators. The Act places costs on offenders and vessel owners (fines, disqualification) and creates time limits, evidentiary rules and police discretion to streamline prosecution and on‑water enforcement.
Mechanically, the Marine Safety (Misuse of Alcohol) Act 2006 creates a statutory regime that (a) prohibits operation of vessels while alcohol is present in the operator's breath or blood (for commercial vessels) or above a specified permitted concentration for other vessels, (b) empowers police to require breath tests, breath analyses and blood samplings in a range of circumstances, (c) prescribes criminal offences for refusals, obstruction and attempts to manipulate results, (d) sets fines and mandatory periods of disqualification tied to measured alcohol concentrations, and (e) establishes evidentiary rules and procedures governing how breath and blood evidence is taken, analysed, tendered and relied on in court. Key enforcement and administrative agencies named in the Act include MAST (the Marine and Safety Authority) and the police, with administration assigned to the Minister for Police and Emergency Management until administrative arrangements otherwise provide (s 62).
The Act divides vessels into commercial and non-commercial (ss 13-17). For commercial vessels the presence of any alcohol in breath or blood is an offence to operate (s 13). For non-commercial vessels the statutory limit is the "permitted concentration", defined as 0.05 g/210 L breath or 0.05 g/100 mL blood (s 3), and a person must not operate with more than that concentration (s 16). Owners and persons in charge carry secondary duties to cause or allow no person with alcohol in breath/blood (commercial) or more than the permitted concentration (non-commercial) to operate the vessel; these owner/person-in-charge offences carry graduated fines (ss 14, 17).
Enforcement mechanics: police may require breath tests whenever it appears a person is, or has just ceased, operating a vessel, and may then require breath analyses if reasonable suspicion of alcohol is formed from the test or otherwise (s 18). Police may also require breath analyses or blood sampling where a person is suspected of having consumed alcohol while operating a vessel (s 19), or where a person was aboard a vessel involved in a maritime accident (s 20). Persons liable under those powers must submit unless they have reasonable excuse; failing to do so attracts criminal penalties and enables custody and detention to permit testing (ss 21-24, 22). Temporal limits and procedural safeguards are prescribed: a breath analysis or blood sampling liability expires if not begun within 3 hours after the "relevant time" (s 25). The Act provides for an election to replace a breath analysis with blood sampling in prescribed circumstances (s 23), and for medical practitioner duties and constraints where consent is not possible (ss 30-33).
Current sections
Direct links to the current provisions in Marine Safety (Misuse of Alcohol) Act 2006.
corresponding maritime authority means an office or body established under a law of another State or a Territory, or under a law of the Commonwealth, and having functions that correspond, or substantially correspond, to those of MAST;
evidentiary certificate means a certificate specified in Part 1 of Schedule 1 ;
evidentiary record means a record specified in Part 2 of Schedule 1 ;
fail, to submit to a procedure or comply with a direction, includes refusing to submit to the procedure or comply with the direction;
fishing vessel means a vessel that is being operated, other than under charter, for or in connection with the taking of fish for a commercial purpose other than marine farming;
liability, of a person to submit to a breath test, breath analysis or blood-sampling, means a liability that the person incurs because of –
(a) the operation of a provision of this Act; or
(b) a requirement of a police officer under this Act; or
(c) in the case of a blood-sampling under section 23 , the person's election to submit to the blood-sampling;
mariners certificate means a certificate, licence, permit or other document (however described) that –
(a) is issued by MAST or a corresponding maritime authority; and
(b) authorises the person to whom it is issued to operate a vessel in a particular capacity in accordance with the conditions specified in that certificate, licence, permit or other document;
maritime accident includes, but is not limited to –
(a) vessels colliding; and
(b) a vessel colliding with a navigational hazard; and
(c) a vessel colliding with the shore or a structure on shore; and
(d) a vessel running aground; and
(e) an accident, involving the use of a vessel, that results in the death or injury of any person or damage to property; and
(f) an explosion or outbreak of fire on a vessel; and
For the purposes of this Act, a reference to "the relevant time" is a reference to –
(a) in relation to a person's liability to submit to a breath analysis under section 18 , the time when the person is first required to submit to a breath test under that section; and
(b) in relation to a person's liability to submit to a breath analysis under section 19 , the time when the person is first required to submit to the breath analysis; and
(c) in relation to a person's liability to submit to a breath analysis or blood-sampling under section 20 , the time when the person is first required to submit to the breath analysis or blood-sampling; and
(d) in relation to a person's liability to submit to a breath analysis or blood-sampling under section 23 , the time when the person is first required to submit to the breath analysis.
5
Determining who is owner of vessel
5 Determining who is owner of vessel
(1) A reference in this Act to the owner of a vessel includes a reference to a person who –
(a) is registered (with or by MAST or a corresponding maritime authority) as the owner of the vessel; or
(b) is a joint owner of the vessel; or
(c) is the charterer, lessee or hirer of the vessel; or
(d) has a right or obligation to exercise or perform any powers or functions of an owner of the vessel; or
(e) publicly represents that he or she has the right or obligation to exercise or perform those powers or functions; or
(f) is a director or other person concerned in the management of a body corporate that owns the vessel.
(2) A person does not cease to be the owner of a vessel for the purposes of this Act if the vessel is –
(a) secured under a mortgage, bill of sale, or other form of security; or
(b) chartered, leased or hired by another person.
6
Determining who is in charge of vessel
6 Determining who is in charge of vessel
(1) For the purposes of this Act, a person is taken to be in charge of a vessel at a particular time if, at that time –
(a) he or she is the only person, or the only adult, aboard the vessel; or
(b) he or she purports by word or deed, and without contradiction by any other person aboard, to be in charge of the vessel; or
(c) the other persons aboard the vessel or a majority of them acknowledge, by word or deed, that the person is in charge of the vessel; or
(d) of all the persons aboard the vessel, he or she has ultimate command of the vessel's movements.
(2) Subsection (1)(d) has effect regardless of whether, at the particular time –
(a) the vessel is underway; or
(b) the person is actually commanding the vessel's movements.
(3) If it is established in any proceedings that, at a particular time, a person was the owner of a vessel and was –
(a) aboard the vessel; and
(b) qualified by a mariners certificate to be in charge of or otherwise operate the vessel –
it is to be presumed, unless the person on the balance of probabilities establishes otherwise, that he or she had ultimate command of the vessel's movements at that time.
7
Status of pilots and masters, &c., of piloted vessels
7 Status of pilots and masters, &c., of piloted vessels
For the avoidance of doubt –
(a) a person who is purporting to exercise the powers or perform the functions of a pilot on a vessel at a particular time is, for the purposes of this Act, taken to be operating the vessel at that time; and
(b) a person is not, for the purposes of this Act, taken to have ceased being in charge of a vessel by reason only that the vessel is temporarily under the direction of a pilot.
(a) a vessel under the control of the Australian Defence Force; or
(b) a warship, naval auxiliary or other vessel operating exclusively in the non-commercial government service of a foreign country.
(2) Subsection (1) has effect regardless of whether the waters that a vessel is in are navigable.
(3) In this section –
non-commercial includes scientific research.
10
When does Act apply to vessels?
10 When does Act apply to vessels?
(1) Unless the contrary intention appears, this Act only applies to vessels that are –
(a) underway; or
(b) involved in maritime accidents.
(2) A vessel is taken to be underway for the purposes of this Act if it is not secured.
(3) To avoid doubt, a vessel is taken to be underway for the purposes of this Act even if it is –
(a) drifting, with or without a sea anchor; or
(b) moving otherwise than under its own power; or
(c) temporarily stranded, and not secured.
(4) However, the fact that a vessel is not underway does not prevent police officers from exercising powers under this Act in respect of the vessel, or in respect of persons on or from the vessel, for the purposes of enforcing this Act, particularly as regards –
(a) acts or omissions that occurred, or may have occurred, while the vessel was underway; or
(b) acts or omissions that would or would be likely to occur if the vessel were to get underway.
(b) there is a real and substantial link between doing the act or thing and Tasmania –
that section, and the other provisions of this Act, applies to that act or thing as if it had been done wholly in Tasmania.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1) , there is a real and substantial link with Tasmania if –
(a) a significant part of the conduct relating to, or constituting, the doing of the act or thing occurred in Tasmania; or
(b) where the act or thing was done wholly or partly outside Tasmania, substantial harmful effects arose in Tasmania.
12
Act binds Crown
12 Act binds Crown
This Act binds the Crown in right of Tasmania and, so far as the legislative power of Parliament permits, in all its other capacities.
Part 2
Restrictions on Use of Alcohol by Mariners
Part 2 Restrictions on Use of Alcohol by Mariners
13
Person who has consumed alcohol not to operate commercial vessel
13 Person who has consumed alcohol not to operate commercial vessel
(1) A person must not operate a commercial vessel if there is alcohol in the person's breath or blood.
Penalty: The penalty provided for this offence by section 41 .
(2) However, it is a defence in proceedings for an offence under subsection (1) if the defendant establishes that –
(a) at the time of the alleged offence, there was an emergency threatening the safety of the commercial vessel or persons aboard the commercial vessel; and
(b) the emergency was unrelated to the conduct of the defendant; and
(c) it was necessary for the defendant to operate the commercial vessel in a particular capacity at that time in order to deal with the emergency; and
(d) the defendant did not operate the commercial vessel in that capacity for any longer than was reasonably necessary to deal with the emergency.
14
Person who has consumed alcohol not to be allowed to operate commercial vessel
14 Person who has consumed alcohol not to be allowed to operate commercial vessel
(1) The owner of a commercial vessel must not cause or allow a person who has alcohol in his or her breath or blood to operate the commercial vessel.
Penalty: In the case of –
(a) a first offence, a fine not exceeding 50 penalty units; and
(b) a second offence, a fine not exceeding 100 penalty units; and
(c) a third or subsequent offence, a fine not exceeding 200 penalty units.
(2) The person in charge of a commercial vessel must not cause or allow another person to operate the commercial vessel if that other person has alcohol in his or her breath or blood.
Penalty: In the case of –
(a) a first offence, a fine not exceeding 50 penalty units; and
(b) a second offence, a fine not exceeding 100 penalty units; and
(c) a third or subsequent offence, a fine not exceeding 200 penalty units.
(3) However, it is a defence in proceedings for an offence under subsection (1) or (2) if the defendant establishes that, at the time of the alleged offence, the defendant did not know and could not reasonably have been expected to know that the person who the defendant caused or allowed to operate the commercial vessel had alcohol in his or her breath or blood.
(4) It is also a defence in proceedings for an offence under subsection (1) or (2) if the defendant establishes that –
(a) at the time of the alleged offence, there was an emergency threatening the safety of the commercial vessel or persons aboard the commercial vessel; and
(b) the emergency was unrelated to the conduct of the defendant or the person who the defendant caused or allowed to operate the commercial vessel; and
(c) it was necessary for the defendant to cause or allow that person to operate the commercial vessel in a particular capacity at that time in order to deal with the emergency; and
(d) the defendant did not cause or allow that person to operate the commercial vessel in that capacity for any longer than was reasonably necessary to deal with the emergency.
15
Application of Division
15 Application of Division
This Division applies to vessels other than commercial vessels.
16
Person who has consumed more than certain amount of alcohol not to operate non-commercial vessel
16 Person who has consumed more than certain amount of alcohol not to operate non-commercial vessel
(1) A person must not operate a vessel to which this Division applies if there is more than the permitted concentration of alcohol in the person's breath or blood.
Penalty: The penalty provided for this offence by section 41 .
(2) However, it is a defence in proceedings for an offence under subsection (1) if the defendant establishes that, at the time of the alleged offence –
(a) another person had overall control of the vessel's means of steering and propulsion; and
(b) that other person was an adult who was competent to exercise that control; and
(c) that other person did not have more than the permitted concentration of alcohol in his or her breath or blood.
(3) It is also a defence in proceedings for an offence under subsection (1) if the defendant establishes that –
(a) at the time of the alleged offence, there was an emergency threatening the safety of the vessel or persons aboard the vessel; and
(b) the emergency was unrelated to the conduct of the defendant; and
(c) it was necessary for the defendant to operate the vessel in a particular capacity at that time in order to deal with the emergency; and
(d) the defendant did not operate the vessel in that capacity for any longer than was reasonably necessary to deal with the emergency.
17
Person who has consumed more than certain amount of alcohol not to be allowed to operate non-commercial vessel
17 Person who has consumed more than certain amount of alcohol not to be allowed to operate non-commercial vessel
(1) The owner of a vessel to which this Division applies must not cause or allow a person who has more than the permitted concentration of alcohol in his or her breath or blood to operate the vessel.
Penalty: In the case of –
(a) a first offence, a fine not exceeding 25 penalty units; and
(b) a second offence, a fine not exceeding 50 penalty units; and
(c) a third or subsequent offence, a fine not exceeding 100 penalty units.
(2) The person in charge of a vessel to which this Division applies must not cause or allow another person to operate the vessel if the other person has more than the permitted concentration of alcohol in his or her breath or blood.
Penalty: In the case of –
(a) a first offence, a fine not exceeding 25 penalty units; and
(b) a second offence, a fine not exceeding 50 penalty units; and
(c) a third or subsequent offence, a fine not exceeding 100 penalty units.
(3) However, it is a defence in proceedings for an offence under subsection (1) or (2) if the defendant establishes that, at the time of the alleged offence, the defendant did not know and could not reasonably have been expected to know that the person who the defendant caused or allowed to operate the vessel had more than the permitted concentration of alcohol in his or her breath or blood.
(4) It is also a defence in proceedings for an offence under subsection (1) or (2) if the defendant establishes that –
(a) at the time of the alleged offence, there was an emergency threatening the safety of the vessel or persons aboard the vessel; and
(b) the emergency was unrelated to the conduct of the defendant or the person who the defendant caused or allowed to operate the vessel; and
(c) it was necessary for the defendant to cause or allow that person to operate the vessel in a particular capacity at that time in order to deal with the emergency; and
(d) the defendant did not cause or allow that person to operate the vessel in that capacity for any longer than was reasonably necessary to deal with the emergency.
Part 3
Enforcement of Alcohol Restrictions
Part 3 Enforcement of Alcohol Restrictions
18
Breath testing, &c., of vessel operators
18 Breath testing, &c., of vessel operators
(1) This section applies if it appears to a police officer that a person is, or has just ceased, operating a vessel.
(2) To determine whether an offence has been committed under Part 2 , the police officer may require the person to submit to a breath test.
(3) The police officer may impose the requirement whether or not –
(a) the police officer suspects there is alcohol in the person's breath or blood; or
(b) the vessel is underway.
(4) After the police officer imposes the requirement, the person also becomes liable to submit to a breath analysis if the police officer (or another police officer) reasonably suspects (from the result of the breath test or otherwise) that there is alcohol in the person's breath or blood.
19
Breath analysis, &c., of vessel operators suspected of having consumed alcohol
19 Breath analysis, &c., of vessel operators suspected of having consumed alcohol
(1) This section applies if –
(a) it appears to a police officer that a person is, or has just ceased, operating a vessel; and
(b) the police officer reasonably suspects that there is alcohol in the person's breath or blood.
(2) To determine whether an offence has been committed under Part 2 , the police officer may require the person to submit to a breath analysis.
(3) The police officer may impose the requirement whether or not the vessel is underway.
(4) If the police officer requires the person to submit to a breath analysis, the police officer (or another police officer) may require the person firstly to submit to a breath test.
20
Breath analysis, &c., of persons involved in maritime accidents
20 Breath analysis, &c., of persons involved in maritime accidents
(1) This section applies if –
(a) it appears to a police officer that a maritime accident has occurred; and
(b) the police officer reasonably suspects that a person was aboard a vessel involved in the maritime accident when it occurred.
(2) The police officer may require the person to submit to a breath analysis or blood-sampling.
(3) The police officer may impose the requirement whether or not –
(a) the police officer suspects that there is alcohol in the person's breath or blood; or
(b) the person is, or was when the maritime accident occurred, operating the vessel; or
(c) any vessel apparently involved in the maritime accident is underway.
(4) If the police officer requires the person to submit to a breath analysis or blood-sampling, the police officer (or another police officer) may require the person firstly to submit to a breath test.
21
Liable person must submit to breath test, breath analysis or blood-sampling
21 Liable person must submit to breath test, breath analysis or blood-sampling
(1) This section applies if a person is liable to submit to a breath test, breath analysis or blood-sampling under Division 1 .
(2) The person must not, without reasonable excuse, fail to –
(a) submit to the breath test, breath analysis or blood-sampling; or
(b) comply with such directions as the police officer requiring the person to submit to the breath test, breath analysis or blood-sampling (or another police officer) may give the person to enable it to be carried out.
Penalty: Fine not exceeding 30 penalty units or imprisonment for a term not exceeding one month, or both.
(3) Without limiting the generality of subsection (2)(b) , the person may be directed to –
(a) go to such place (by such means and with such persons) as the police officer giving the direction nominates; and
(b) submit to the breath test, breath analysis or blood-sampling at that place.
(4) However, it is a defence in proceedings for an offence under subsection (2) in respect of a breath analysis liability if the defendant establishes that –
(a) the defendant was informed by the approved operator of a breath analysing instrument or a police officer that the defendant could elect to submit to a blood-sampling instead of the breath analysis; and
(b) the defendant made that election; and
(c) the blood-sampling was carried out, or could have practicably been carried out, within 3 hours after the relevant time.
(5) In proceedings for an offence under subsection (2) , the medical or physical condition of the defendant at the time of the alleged offence is not a reasonable excuse for the purposes of that subsection unless the court is satisfied by medical evidence that, by reason of that condition –
(a) it was not possible, practicable or safe for the defendant to submit to the relevant procedure; or
(b) the defendant would have suffered an abnormally high level of pain, discomfort or distress in submitting to the relevant procedure; or
(c) it was otherwise unreasonable to expect the defendant to submit to the relevant procedure.
22
Liable person failing to submit to breath test, breath analysis or blood-sampling may be taken into custody
22 Liable person failing to submit to breath test, breath analysis or blood-sampling may be taken into custody
(1) This section applies if a person who is liable to submit to a breath test, breath analysis or blood-sampling under Division 1 –
(a) fails to submit to the breath test, breath analysis or blood-sampling; or
(b) fails to comply with a direction under section 21(2)(b) given in connection with the breath test, breath analysis or blood-sampling, or is in such a condition or behaves in such a manner as to give the police officer who has given the direction (or another police officer) reasonable grounds to believe that the person will not comply with the direction.
(2) A police officer may –
(a) take the person into custody; and
(b) convey the person, or cause the person to be conveyed, to some appropriate place; and
(c) detain the person at that place for so long as is necessary to enable a requirement to be imposed on the person under section 23 .
(3) The person, if taken into custody pursuant to subsection (2) , must not –
(a) escape or attempt to escape from custody; or
(b) obstruct or hinder his or her conveyance to a place pursuant to that subsection.
Penalty: Fine not exceeding 30 penalty units or imprisonment for a term not exceeding one month, or both.
23
Person liable to submit to breath analysis may elect to have blood-sampling instead
23 Person liable to submit to breath analysis may elect to have blood-sampling instead
(1) This section applies if –
(a) a person who is liable to submit to a breath analysis under Division 1 is being detained at a place pursuant to section 22(2) ; and
(b) a breath analysis can be carried out forthwith at the place.
(2) A police officer may require the person to submit to a breath analysis at the place.
(3) If the person fails to comply with the requirement, the approved operator of a breath analysing instrument at the place is to inform the person that he or she may elect to submit to a blood-sampling instead of the breath analysis.
(4) However, the approved operator need not comply with subsection (3) if he or she does not believe that the blood-sampling could be practicably begun within 3 hours after the relevant time.
(5) If the blood-sampling election is offered and the person makes that election, the approved operator is to arrange for a medical practitioner or nurse to carry out the blood-sampling.
24
Offence to refuse breath analysis while in custody if alternative election not made, &c.
24 Offence to refuse breath analysis while in custody if alternative election not made, &c.
(1) This section applies if a person is liable to submit to a breath analysis under section 23(2) .
(2) The person must not fail to submit to the breath analysis.
Penalty: Fine not exceeding 30 penalty units or imprisonment for a term not exceeding one month, or both.
(3) However, it is a defence in any proceedings for an offence under subsection (2) if the defendant establishes that –
(a) the defendant was informed in accordance with section 23(3) that he or she could elect to submit to a blood-sampling instead of the breath analysis; and
(b) the defendant made that election; and
(c) the blood-sampling was, or could have practicably been, carried out within 3 hours after the relevant time.
25
Duration of breath analysis liability
25 Duration of breath analysis liability
(1) A person's liability to submit to a breath analysis or blood-sampling under Division 1 or section 23(2) expires 3 hours after the relevant time if the breath analysis or blood-sampling is not begun within those 3 hours.
(2) A police officer is to have regard to subsection (1) when enforcing this Act and, more specifically, is not to require a person to submit to a breath analysis under Division 1 or section 23 , or to a blood-sampling under Division 1 , unless the police officer believes that the breath analysis or blood-sampling could be practicably begun before the person's liability to submit to it expires.
(3) However, a failure to comply with subsection (2) does not invalidate any action of a police officer.
26
Offence to attempt to manipulate result of breath test, breath analysis or blood-sampling
26 Offence to attempt to manipulate result of breath test, breath analysis or blood-sampling
(1) This section applies if a person has become liable under this Act to submit to a breath test, breath analysis or blood-sampling.
(2) The person must not, before submitting to the breath test, breath analysis or blood-sampling, do anything with the intention of altering the concentration of alcohol in the person's blood.
Penalty: Fine not exceeding 30 penalty units or imprisonment for a term not exceeding one month, or both.
27
Enforcement procedures not to jeopardise safety of persons being given first aid, &c.
27 Enforcement procedures not to jeopardise safety of persons being given first aid, &c.
(1) This section applies if first aid or medical treatment is being administered to a person by –
(a) a medical practitioner; or
(b) a nurse; or
(c) an ambulance officer.
(2) A police officer is not entitled to require the person to submit to a breath test, breath analysis or blood-sampling under this Act unless the person responsible for administering the first aid or medical treatment has –
(a) been informed that the police officer intends to impose the requirement; and
(b) been asked whether it is safe for the person to submit to the breath test, breath analysis or blood-sampling (or a question to that effect); and
(c) indicated, either by an affirmative answer to the question or by raising no objection on medical grounds, that it is safe for the person to submit to the breath test, breath analysis or blood-sampling.
(3) A requirement imposed on the person contrary to this section is void and the results of a breath test, breath analysis or blood-sampling carried out pursuant to that requirement are inadmissible in any proceedings against the person under any Act.
(4) This section prevails over any section of Part 2 or any other section of this Part.
(5) In this section –
ambulance officer means a person who is providing ambulance services –
Blood-sampling may be required even if breath test or analysis not safe or practicable
28 Blood-sampling may be required even if breath test or analysis not safe or practicable
(1) This section applies if a police officer –
(a) is prevented by section 27 from requiring a person to submit to a breath test or breath analysis under this Act but is not similarly impeded as regards requiring a blood-sampling; or
(b) believes that, by reason of a person's condition –
(i) it would be impracticable or unreasonable to require the person to submit to a breath test or breath analysis under this Act; or
(ii) it might not be safe to require the person to submit to a breath test or breath analysis under this Act.
(2) The police officer may require the person to submit to a blood-sampling instead of the breath test or breath analysis.
(3) The person must not, if the police officer's power under subsection (2) is exercised, fail without reasonable excuse to –
(a) submit to the blood-sampling; and
(b) comply with such directions as the police officer (or another police officer) may give the person to enable the blood-sampling to be carried out.
Penalty: Fine not exceeding 30 penalty units or imprisonment for a term not exceeding one month, or both.
(4) Without limiting the generality of subsection (3)(b) , the person may be directed to –
(a) go to such place (by such means and with such persons) as the relevant police officer nominates; and
(b) submit to the blood-sampling at that place.
(5) In proceedings for an offence under subsection (3) , the medical or physical condition of the defendant at the time of the alleged offence is not a reasonable excuse for the purposes of that subsection unless the court is satisfied by medical evidence that, by reason of that condition –
(a) it was not possible, practicable or safe for the defendant to submit to the blood-sampling; or
(b) the defendant would have suffered an abnormally high level of pain, discomfort or distress in submitting to the blood-sampling; or
(c) it was otherwise unreasonable to expect the defendant to submit to the blood-sampling.
29
Rights and obligations on completion of breath analysis, &c.
29 Rights and obligations on completion of breath analysis, &c.
(1) As soon as practicable after a person has submitted to a breath analysis –
(a) the approved operator of the breath analysing instrument must –
(i) read over to the person a written statement, in the prescribed form appropriate to the case, indicating the concentration of alcohol in the person's breath as determined by the breath analysis; and
(ii) hand the person the written statement; and
(b) the approved operator of the breath analysing instrument must, if satisfied that a blood-sampling could practicably be begun within 3 hours after the relevant time, inform the person that the person may immediately request a blood-sampling.
(2) On being handed the written statement, the person may immediately request the approved operator of the breath analysing instrument that a blood-sampling be carried out if the person has been informed pursuant to subsection (1)(b) that he or she may make that request.
(3) If the person makes that request –
(a) the approved operator of the breath analysing instrument must arrange for the person's blood-sampling to be begun by a medical practitioner or nurse within 3 hours after the relevant time; and
(b) the person is not liable for any costs incurred in making or attempting to make those arrangements or in carrying out the blood-sampling.
30
Blood-sampling of person incapable of consenting, and related duty of medical practitioner
30 Blood-sampling of person incapable of consenting, and related duty of medical practitioner
(1) This section applies if –
(a) a person is liable under this Act to submit to a blood-sampling; and
(b) the person is being treated by a medical practitioner; and
(c) the medical practitioner informs a police officer that the person is, by reason of a physical or medical condition, incapable of consenting to the blood-sampling.
(2) The police officer may request the medical practitioner to carry out the blood-sampling.
(3) It is the medical practitioner's duty to comply with the request unless he or she is of the opinion that to do so would be prejudicial to the person's proper care or treatment.
(4) However, in order to comply with the request, the medical practitioner may treat any sample of blood that has already been taken from the person in connection with the person's diagnosis or treatment, and is available for analysis, as having been taken pursuant to the request.
31
Duty of medical practitioner who refrains from carrying out blood-sampling in patient's interest
31 Duty of medical practitioner who refrains from carrying out blood-sampling in patient's interest
(1) This section applies if a medical practitioner refrains from carrying out a blood-sampling of a person under this Act on the grounds that to do so would, in the medical practitioner's opinion, be prejudicial to the person's proper care or treatment.
(2) It is the medical practitioner's duty, if so requested by a police officer, to –
(a) express an opinion on the question whether the person has or, if the person is in hospital, had, at the time of his or her admission to the hospital, alcohol in his or her body; and
(b) answer, to the best of the medical practitioner's ability, any relevant questions that may be put to him or her by the police officer regarding that question.
32
Duty of medical practitioner who carries out blood-sampling
32 Duty of medical practitioner who carries out blood-sampling
(1) It is the duty of a medical practitioner who carries out a blood-sampling under this Act to comply with the provisions of this section in so far as they apply to that medical practitioner.
(2) If the manner in which the blood-sampling is to be carried out is prescribed, the sampling is to be carried out in the prescribed manner.
(3) The blood sample is to be divided into 3 parts, and this may be done either when the sample is taken or afterwards.
(4) As soon practicable after the blood sample is divided into 3 parts, each of those parts is to be enclosed in a container issued for the purposes by an approved analyst.
(5) As soon as practicable after the 3 parts of the blood sample have been enclosed in containers, the containers are to be labelled in the prescribed manner.
(6) Once the containers have been labelled in the prescribed manner –
(a) one of the containers is, as soon as practicable, to be tendered to the subject or, if the subject is in custody, delivered to a police officer; and
(b) the other 2 containers are, within 10 days, to be delivered to an approved analyst.
33
Follow-up procedure for blood-sampling of person incapable of consenting
33 Follow-up procedure for blood-sampling of person incapable of consenting
(1) This section applies if, under section 30 , a medical practitioner carries out a blood-sampling of a person who is incapable of consenting to that procedure.
(2) The police officer who requested that the blood-sampling be carried out (or another police officer) must, as soon as the police officer (or other police officer) considers it practicable to do so having regard to the person's condition –
(a) give written notice to the person that the blood-sampling has been carried out; and
(b) tender to the person the part of the blood sample referred to in section 32(6)(a) ; and
(c) give the person written notice to the effect that he or she may object to the blood sample being analysed but that doing so without a reasonable excuse is an offence under this Act.
(3) The person is guilty of an offence if, after being given the written notice referred to in subsection (2)(c) , he or she objects without reasonable excuse to the sample being analysed.
Penalty: Fine not exceeding 30 penalty units.
34
Retention of blood sample during detention in custody
34 Retention of blood sample during detention in custody
(1) This section applies if a container containing part of a blood sample is delivered to a police officer under section 32(6)(a) .
(2) If the manner in which the container is to be kept is prescribed, the container is to be kept in the prescribed manner.
(3) If the subject is released from custody within 24 hours after the blood sample was taken, the container is to be tendered to the subject on his or her release.
(4) If the container is not tendered to the subject as provided by subsection (3) , it must, on a written request made by or on behalf of the subject, be delivered to –
(a) the subject; or
(b) such other person at such place as is specified in the request.
(5) A request under subsection (4) is to be made to such person or at such place as may be prescribed.
(1) This section applies if 2 containers containing parts of a sample of blood taken from a person under this Act are delivered to an approved analyst.
(2) The approved analyst may analyse the part of the sample contained in one of the containers.
(3) Except as a court may otherwise direct, the part of the sample contained in the second container must not be analysed or otherwise dealt with except on the joint written request of –
(a) the subject (or a person acting on behalf of the subject); and
(4) After analysing any part of the sample, the approved analyst must prepare a report of the analysis.
(5) The report is to state the concentration of alcohol in the part of the sample analysed, expressed in grams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood, as determined by the analysis.
(6) Within 21 days after completing the report of the analysis, the approved analyst must cause a copy of the report to be –
(a) served on the subject (or a person acting on behalf of the subject); and
(a) the copy of the report must be served by posting it to the residential or postal address, or address of business or employment, of the person being served, as last known to the approved analyst; and
(b) the copy of the report is taken to have been served when it is posted.
(8) For the purposes of subsection (6)(b) , a copy of the report may be provided by any means or in any manner.
Division 4
Police powers
Division 4 Police powers
36
Ancillary police powers
36 Ancillary police powers
(1) For the purposes of enforcing this Act, a police officer may, according to circumstance, do any one or any combination of the following:
(a) hail or signal a vessel;
(b) direct a person on a vessel to alter its speed or direction;
(c) direct a person on a vessel to bring it to a halt (with or without casting anchor or securing a line to anything and with or without shutting off any engines or taking in any sails);
(d) direct a person not to move a vessel for a period specified by the police officer;
(e) direct a person to take a vessel to a place nominated by the police officer;
(f) bring a police vessel alongside a vessel (with or without securing lines to the vessel);
(g) board and remain on a vessel;
(h) inspect, for the presence of an engine, a vessel boarded by the police officer;
(i) direct a person to temporarily surrender any key or lanyard required to start or operate an engine on a vessel;
(j) request a person to produce a mariners certificate, certificate of survey or other document for the police officer's inspection;
(k) direct a person to produce a mariners certificate, certificate of survey or other document within such period, of not less than 7 days, and at such reasonable place as the police officer specifies;
(l) direct a person to do (if necessary or expedient, by or within a specified time) one or more of the following:
(i) board, or disembark from, a police vessel or other vessel;
(ii) go onto, or get off, a jetty or other structure;
(iii) go to, or leave, a place ashore;
(m) direct a person to remain (either for a specified time or until further notice) –
(i) on a police vessel or other vessel; or
(ii) on a jetty or other structure; or
(iii) at a place ashore;
(n) detain a vessel for the purposes of establishing or confirming the identity of the vessel or the identity of persons on the vessel;
(o) direct a person to remain at or leave the scene of a maritime accident;
(p) direct a person to take or not take a specified action at the scene of a maritime accident;
(q) ask questions of persons on or near vessels, or persons at or near the scene of maritime accidents, and direct those persons to answer those questions.
(2) A police officer enforcing this Act may be assisted by such persons as he or she considers necessary or expedient in the circumstances.
(3) Nothing in subsection (1) is to be taken as limiting enforcement powers conferred on police officers under other Acts.
(4) A person who is given a direction by a police officer pursuant to subsection (1) must not, without reasonable excuse, fail to comply with that direction.
Penalty: Fine not exceeding 30 penalty units or imprisonment for a term not exceeding one month, or both.
(5) The Crown is not liable for any damage that may be caused to any vessel, cargo, structure or other thing as a result of an act or omission of a police officer exercising power under subsection (1) in good faith.
37
Limitation on exercise of police powers
37 Limitation on exercise of police powers
(1) It is the duty of a police officer exercising or seeking to exercise power under this Act –
(a) to have regard to the weather conditions prevailing at that time; and
(b) not to endanger the safety of any person or vessel; and
(c) not to detain a person or vessel for longer than is reasonably necessary for the power to be exercised; and
(d) not to direct, without good cause, that a commercial vessel or fishing vessel be taken to a place outside its usual or scheduled area or routes of operation.
(2) It is the duty of a police officer requiring a person to submit to a breath test under this Part to ensure, as far as practicable, that –
(a) the breath test is carried out as soon as practicable; and
(b) the breath test is carried out at the place where the requirement was imposed or at the nearest practicable place.
(3) However, a failure of duty under this section does not invalidate the exercise of a power under this Act.
38
Identification of offenders
38 Identification of offenders
(1) This section applies if a police officer reasonably suspects that a person has contravened another section of this Act.
(2) The police officer may require the person to state one or more of the following:
(a) the person's name;
(b) the person's age;
(c) the person's address.
(3) If the power under subsection (2) is exercised, the person must not –
(a) refuse or fail to comply with the police officer's requirement; or
(b) state a false name, age or address to the police officer.
Penalty: Fine not exceeding 30 penalty units or imprisonment for a term not exceeding one month, or both.
(4) The police officer may arrest the person without warrant if the police officer believes that a person has contravened subsection (3) .
39
Police may direct certain persons not to operate vessels, &c.
39 Police may direct certain persons not to operate vessels, &c.
(1) This section applies if a police officer reasonably suspects that –
(a) a person operating or apparently about to operate a commercial vessel has consumed alcohol; or
(b) a person operating or apparently about to operate a vessel to which Division 2 of Part 2 applies has more than the permitted concentration of alcohol in the person's blood.
(2) The police officer may –
(a) direct the person not to operate the vessel for a period of time specified by the police officer; and
(b) give any person aboard the vessel such directions as the police officer reasonably considers necessary to ensure the safety of –
(i) the vessel and persons aboard the vessel; and
(ii) if applicable, other persons, other vessels or structures; and
(c) if it appears to the police officer that no person who may legally operate the vessel is available, take such steps as the police officer reasonably considers necessary to ensure the safety of the vessel and persons aboard the vessel including, if circumstances require –
(i) removing the vessel to a place of safety (if necessary by operating it or taking it in tow); or
(ii) temporarily preventing its further operation.
(3) A person must not fail to comply with a direction under subsection (2) .
Penalty: Fine not exceeding 30 penalty units or imprisonment for a term not exceeding one month, or both.
(4) The Crown is not liable for any damage that may be caused to any vessel, cargo, structure or other thing as a result of an act or omission of a police officer exercising power under subsection (2)(c) in good faith.
Division 5
Penalties
Division 5 Penalties
40
Interpretation of Division
40 Interpretation of Division
In this Division –
disqualification order means the sentencing order by which a person is disqualified;
disqualify, a person convicted of an offence, means –
(a) for an offence under Division 1 of Part 2 or an obstructive offence in respect of a commercial vessel, prohibit the person from operating commercial vessels; and
(b) for an offence under Division 2 of Part 2 or an obstructive offence in respect of a vessel other than a commercial vessel, prohibit the person from operating vessels of such class or description as the court imposing the disqualification considers appropriate in the circumstances;
local mariners certificate means a mariners certificate issued by MAST;
relevant matters, in relation to the commission of an offence against this Act, includes –
(a) the nature and seriousness of the offence (including whether the safety of any persons, vessels or property was put at risk); and
(b) the circumstances in which the offence was committed; and
(c) the offender's level of co-operation as regards the applicable investigation and enforcement requirements of this Act; and
(d) the offender's antecedents and character; and
(e) the number and type of mariners certificates, if any, held by the offender.
41
Penalties for direct breaches of marine alcohol restrictions
41 Penalties for direct breaches of marine alcohol restrictions
(1) This section applies if a court convicts a person of an offence under Part 2 that is specified in column 1 of the table at the foot of this section ("the table").
(2) The court must, regardless of any other penalty it may impose for the offence –
(a) impose the fine that is specified in column 3 of the table for the offence; and
(b) disqualify the person for the period that is specified in column 4 of the table for the offence.
(3) However, if the convicted person satisfies the court that there are special circumstances why the specified fine or period of disqualification (or both) should not be imposed, the court may impose a lesser fine or period of disqualification (or both).
(4) For the purposes of subsection (2) , the fine and the period of disqualification are to be ascertained by reference to the concentration of alcohol in the convicted person's breath or blood as specified in column 2 of the table.
(5) On disqualifying the convicted person, the court may also do either or both of the following:
(a) suspend or cancel a local mariners certificate held by the convicted person;
(b) prohibit the person from applying, for a period specified by the court, for a local mariners certificate specified by the court.
(a) the same period as the period of disqualification; or
(b) such lesser period as the court thinks fit.
(7) For the purposes of exercising any of its discretions under this section, the court may have regard to such matters as it thinks fit in the circumstances, including any relevant matters.
(8) The court is to cause copies or notice of its sentencing orders to be given to MAST and MAST may inform a corresponding maritime authority of those orders.
| Column 1Offence | Column 2Concentration of alcohol(grams of alcohol in 210L of breath or in 100ml of blood) | Column 3Fine(in penalty units) | Column 4Disqualification period(in months) |
| Section 13(1) | Not more than 0.05 | 2 | 3 |
| | More than 0.05 but not more than 0.100 | 4 | 6 |
| | More than 0.100 but not more than 0.150 | 6 | 9 |
| | More than 0.150 but not more than 0.200 | 8 | 12 |
| | More than 0.200 | 10 | 15 |
| Section 16(1) | More than 0.05 but not more than 0.100 | 2 | 3 |
| | More than 0.100 but not more than 0.150 | 4 | 6 |
| | More than 0.150 but not more than 0.200 | 6 | 9 |
| | More than 0.200 | 8 | 12 |
42
Additional penalty of disqualification for certain offences
42 Additional penalty of disqualification for certain offences
(1) This section applies if a court convicts a person of –
(a) an offence under Part 2 that is not specified in column 1 of the table at the foot of section 41 ; or
(b) an obstructive offence.
(2) The court may, in addition to any other penalty it may impose for the offence, disqualify the person for a period not exceeding 3 years.
(3) The disqualification may be absolute, or limited in its effect according to such factors, whether as to time, geographic area, maritime activity or otherwise, as the court thinks fit.
(4) On exercising its power under subsection (2) , the court may also do either or both of the following:
(a) suspend or cancel a local mariners certificate held by the convicted person;
(b) prohibit the person from applying, for a period specified by the court, for a local mariners certificate specified by the court.
(a) the same period as the period of disqualification; or
(b) such lesser period as the court thinks fit.
(6) In exercising its discretions under this section, the court may have regard to such matters as it thinks fit, including –
(a) any relevant matters; and
(b) the weight that the court gives to the factors of deterrence and punishment in sentencing.
(7) The court is to cause copies or notice of its sentencing orders to be given to MAST and MAST may inform a corresponding maritime authority of those orders.
43
Offence to operate vessel contrary to disqualification order
43 Offence to operate vessel contrary to disqualification order
(1) This section applies if a person is subject to a disqualification order.
(2) The person must not contravene the disqualification order.
Penalty: Fine not exceeding 100 penalty units and, in the case of a continuing offence, a further fine not exceeding 10 penalty units for each day during which the offence continues.
44
Offence to apply for local mariners certificate if prohibited from doing so
44 Offence to apply for local mariners certificate if prohibited from doing so
(1) This section applies if, pursuant to section 41(5)(b) or section 42(4)(b) , a person is prohibited from applying for a specified kind of local mariners certificate for a specified period.
(2) The person must not, during the specified period, apply for a local mariners certificate of the specified kind.
Penalty: Fine not exceeding 100 penalty units.
(3) However, the person does not commit any offence under subsection (2) by applying for a restricted mariners certificate under Division 6 during the specified period.
Division 6
Restricted mariners certificates
Division 6 Restricted mariners certificates
45
Interpretation of Division
45 Interpretation of Division
In this Division –
disqualify and "disqualification order" have the same meaning as in Division 5 ;
obstructive offence has the same meaning as in Division 5 .
46
Disqualified person may apply for restricted mariners certificate
46 Disqualified person may apply for restricted mariners certificate
(1) A person who is subject to a disqualification order may apply to a court of petty sessions for an order authorising the issue of a restricted mariners certificate.
(2) A restricted mariners certificate is a mariners certificate that authorises the person to operate a vessel of a particular class or description, despite being prohibited from doing so by the disqualification order.
(3) The application must –
(a) be made in writing; and
(b) state the name, age and residential address of the applicant and an address for service of notices; and
(c) contain details of every mariners certificate held by the applicant at the time of making the application (including any that are suspended); and
(d) contain details of every other mariners certificate held by the applicant during the 10-year period immediately preceding the making of the application (including any that were surrendered or for any reason cancelled); and
(e) as far as practicable, give details of the convictions, if any, recorded against the applicant for offences against the laws of Tasmania or any other jurisdiction in the 10-year period immediately preceding the making of the application and involving the operation of a vessel, including –
(i) the date on which each of the offences was committed; and
(ii) the courts by which, and the dates on which, the applicant was convicted and particulars of penalties imposed or other orders made in respect of the offences or, if any of the offences were dealt with by infringement notice of any kind, the infringement notice penalties; and
(f) give details of the disqualification order and state whether any similar disqualification has previously been imposed on the applicant (in Tasmania or elsewhere) and, if so, the period of the disqualification and the reasons for it; and
(g) state the grounds on which the applicant asks for the order authorising the issue of the restricted mariners certificate; and
(h) contain details of the severe and unusual hardship that would be suffered by the applicant, or the applicant's dependants, if the application were refused; and
(i) state the conditions on which the applicant asks the court to authorise the issue of the restricted mariners certificate; and
(j) be verified by statutory declaration made by the applicant; and
(k) be accompanied by the prescribed fee, if any; and
(l) be filed with the clerk of the court.
(4) At least 7 days before the application is to be heard by the court, the applicant must give a copy of the application to –
(a) the chief executive officer of MAST; and
(b) the Commissioner of Police.
47
Courts may make order authorising issue of restricted mariners certificate
47 Courts may make order authorising issue of restricted mariners certificate
(1) A court of petty sessions may, on an application under section 46 , make an order authorising the issue of a restricted mariners certificate if it is satisfied that –
(a) the applicant's disqualification is imposing or will impose severe and unusual hardship on the applicant or the applicant's dependants; and
(b) the restricted mariners certificate should be issued to mitigate or alleviate that hardship; and
(c) the issue of the restricted mariners certificate will not be contrary to the public interest.
(2) However, the court is not to make an order under subsection (1) in respect of a conviction for an offence under this Act if –
(a) the offence was committed during any period of disqualification, or within 3 years after the end of any period of disqualification, imposed under this Act; or
(b) the offence was under section 13(1) or section 16(1) and the offender had alcohol in his or her blood of a concentration equal to or greater than 0.200 grams of alcohol in 210 litres of breath or 100 millilitres of blood; or
(c) the offence was an obstructive offence; or
(d) at the time of the offence the applicant was not authorised by a mariners certificate to operate, in the relevant capacity, the vessel in respect of which the offence was committed or cannot satisfy the court that he or she would, but for an unintentional failure to comply with an administrative requirement, have been so authorised to operate the vessel in that capacity at that time; or
(e) at the time of the offence the applicant was operating a vessel prescribed for this paragraph.
(3) The court may make an order under subsection (1) on such terms as the court thinks fit and, without limiting the generality of this, may provide for a restricted mariners certificate to have general application or application that is qualified by such factors as time, geographic area or maritime activity.
(4) MAST must, on application by a person in whose favour an order under subsection (1) has been made and on payment of the prescribed fee, if any, issue the person with a restricted mariners certificate that conforms with the terms of the order.
(5) MAST has power to do such things as may be necessary or expedient for the purpose of discharging its function under subsection (4) .
(6) A court of petty sessions may, on application by the holder of a restricted mariners certificate supported by such evidence as the court considers necessary and appropriate in the circumstances, vary the terms or conditions of the certificate.
(7) A court that has dealt with, or is about to deal with, the holder of a restricted mariners certificate for an offence relating to the operation of a vessel, or a court of petty sessions, may, on its own initiative or on application made by or on behalf of the Commissioner of Police or MAST, vary the terms or conditions of the restricted mariners certificate or revoke the certificate.
48
Offence to contravene conditions of restricted mariners certificate, &c.
48 Offence to contravene conditions of restricted mariners certificate, &c.
(1) This section applies if a person (referred to in this section as "the disqualified person") is issued with a restricted mariners certificate under section 47 .
(2) The disqualified person must not –
(a) contravene any term or condition of the restricted mariners certificate; or
(b) contravene any order of a court made in relation to the restricted mariners certificate (including the order that authorised the issue of that certificate).
Penalty: Fine not exceeding 30 penalty units or imprisonment for a term not exceeding one month, or both.
(3) A person must not knowingly employ, or knowingly cause or allow, the disqualified person to operate a vessel in contravention of –
(a) any term or condition of the restricted mariners certificate; or
(b) any order of a court made in relation to the restricted mariners certificate (including the order that authorised the issue of that certificate).
Penalty: Fine not exceeding 30 penalty units or imprisonment for a term not exceeding one month, or both.
Division 7
Supplementary provisions
Division 7 Supplementary provisions
49
Notice of offence
49 Notice of offence
(1) This section applies if a person who holds a mariners certificate issued by a corresponding maritime authority is convicted of an offence under this Act.
(2) MAST may inform the corresponding maritime authority of the conviction and, if applicable, of any disqualification or prohibition imposed on the person for the offence.
Part 4
Evidence
Part 4 Evidence
50
Presumptions regarding breath tests and analyses, &c.
50 Presumptions regarding breath tests and analyses, &c.
(1) In any proceedings –
(a) the concentration of alcohol in a sample of blood taken from a person in accordance with this Act is to be taken to be the actual concentration of alcohol in the person's blood when the sample was taken, unless it is established on the balance of probabilities that the concentration of alcohol in the person's blood at that time was not greater than the permitted concentration; and
(b) the concentration of alcohol in a person's breath as determined by a properly carried out breath analysis under this Act is to be taken to be the actual concentration of alcohol in the person's breath when he or she submitted to the breath analysis, unless it is established on the balance of probabilities that the concentration of alcohol in the person's breath at that time was not greater than the permitted concentration; and
(c) if there is conflict between the evidence referred to in paragraph (a) and the evidence referred to in paragraph (b) , the evidence referred to in paragraph (a) prevails.
(2) If, in any proceedings, it is established that the concentration of alcohol in the breath or blood of a person who became liable to submit to a breath analysis or blood-sampling under this Act was, at any time within 4 hours after the relevant time, equal to or not less than a particular concentration (being a concentration not less than the permitted concentration), that particular concentration is to be taken to have been the concentration of alcohol in the person's breath or blood at the time of the relevant act of operating a vessel unless it is established that the concentration of alcohol in the person's breath or blood at the time of that act was not greater than the permitted concentration.
(3) If, in any proceedings against a person for an offence under section 13(1) , it is established that the person became liable to submit to a breath analysis or blood-sampling under this Act and had alcohol in his or her breath or blood at any time within 4 hours after the relevant time, it is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, that the person had alcohol in his or her breath or blood at the time of the relevant act of operating a vessel.
(4) For the purposes of this section, a breath analysis is properly carried out if it is carried out by means of a breath analysing instrument in proper working order operated by an approved operator in an approved way.
(5) In this section, unless the contrary intention appears –
approved way, of operating a breath analysing instrument, means –
(a) if the regulations prescribe an approved way of operating the instrument, the way so prescribed; or
(b) if the regulations do not prescribe an approved way of operating the instrument but regulations under the Corresponding Act prescribe an approved way or manner of operating the instrument, the way or manner prescribed under the Corresponding Act;
proceedings means proceedings for an offence under this Act or proceedings on a charge of manslaughter arising out of the operation of a vessel;
relevant act, of operating a vessel, in relation to a person against or in respect of whom proceedings are brought, means the act of operating a vessel alleged to be an ingredient of the offence or crime with which the defendant is charged in the proceedings.
51
Restrictions on admission of evidence of breath analyses
51 Restrictions on admission of evidence of breath analyses
Evidence of the concentration of alcohol in the breath of a person as determined by a breath analysing instrument is not admissible in any proceedings unless –
(a) such a statement as is referred to in section 29(1) was read over to the person, and handed to the person, on completion of the analysis; and
(b) if the person made such a request as is referred to in section 29(2) –
(i) a sample of the person's blood was taken by a medical practitioner or nurse in accordance with this Act and that blood-sampling began within 3 hours after the relevant time; or
(ii) the person refused to submit to a blood-sampling after appropriate arrangements had been made under that section in response to the request.
52
Evidence as to carrying out breath analyses
52 Evidence as to carrying out breath analyses
If, in any proceedings, a person gives evidence –
(a) that at a specified time and place he or she carried out a breath analysis of a person by means of a breath analysing instrument; and
(b) that, at that specified time, the person giving the evidence was an approved operator; and
(c) that, at that specified time, the instrument was in proper working order –
that evidence is prima facie evidence of the particulars so stated and of the fact that, when the analysis was carried out, the instrument was in proper working order.
53
Evidence of matters related to failure to submit to breath analysis
53 Evidence of matters related to failure to submit to breath analysis
If, in any proceedings, a person gives evidence –
(a) that at a specified time and place a named person failed to submit to a breath analysis; and
(b) that at that time and place a breath analysis could have been properly carried out by the person giving evidence by means of a breath analysing instrument that he or she then had with him or her; and
(c) that at that time a breath analysing instrument was in proper working order; and
(d) that at that time the person giving the evidence was an approved operator –
that evidence is prima facie evidence of the particulars so stated.
54
Evidentiary certificates and records
54 Evidentiary certificates and records
In any proceedings, an evidentiary certificate or evidentiary record is prima facie evidence of the matters contained in that evidentiary certificate or evidentiary record.
55
Limitation on tendering of evidentiary certificates and records
55 Limitation on tendering of evidentiary certificates and records
(1) An evidentiary certificate or evidentiary record is not capable of being tendered in evidence by or on behalf of a party to any proceedings unless, at least 14 days before the hearing of the proceedings (or such lesser period before the hearing of the proceedings as the court may approve), a copy of the evidentiary certificate or evidentiary record was served on the other party to the proceedings.
(2) If an evidentiary certificate or evidentiary record is endorsed with a certificate of service purporting to be signed by a person by whom a copy of the evidentiary certificate or evidentiary record was served, the certificate of service is prima facie evidence of the particulars stated in the certificate of service.
(3) Subject to this section, an evidentiary certificate or evidentiary record may be tendered in evidence in proceedings whether or not the person by whom the evidentiary certificate or evidentiary record was signed or made, or any person who, under the supervision of the first-mentioned person, was involved with the analysis to which the evidentiary certificate or evidentiary record relates, is called as a witness in those proceedings.
(4) Where a person by whom an evidentiary certificate or evidentiary record was signed or made, or any person who, under the supervision of the first-mentioned person, was involved with the analysis to which the evidentiary certificate or evidentiary record relates, is called by the defendant as a witness in proceedings, that person may be cross-examined by the defendant as to the facts or matters set out in the evidentiary certificate or evidentiary record.
(5) In any proceedings, no evidence is to be given by or on behalf of any person of the result of the analysis of a sample of the person's blood that was taken otherwise than pursuant to a requirement or direction under this Act unless, at least 4 days before the hearing (or such lesser period before the hearing as the court may approve), notice has been given in writing to the prosecutor or the prosecutor's agent stating the intention to give that evidence.
56
Section 177A of Evidence Act 2001 not to apply to evidentiary certificate, &c.
56 Section 177A of Evidence Act 2001 not to apply to evidentiary certificate, &c.
Evidence as to breath analyses, &c., inadmissible in certain proceedings
57 Evidence as to breath analyses, &c., inadmissible in certain proceedings
(1) Except as is otherwise expressly provided in this Act, the fact that a person has been convicted of an offence under Part 2 or Part 3 is not admissible as evidence in any proceedings that the person was, at any time, drunk, under the influence of intoxicating liquor or incapable of operating a vessel.
(2) Despite anything in this or any other Act, where a person, on being notified under section 33(2) that a sample of the person's blood has been taken for analysis, objects to the sample being analysed, no evidence as to the analysis is admissible in any proceedings to which he or she is a party.
(3) This section has effect notwithstanding the provisions of any contract of insurance and the provisions of any such contract are, to the extent that they exclude, limit, modify or restrict the operation of this section, void.
(4) In this section –
proceedings means all legal proceedings, whether civil, criminal or arbitral.
Part 5
Miscellaneous
Part 5 Miscellaneous
58
Limitation on obligations of medical practitioners
58 Limitation on obligations of medical practitioners
Except as is otherwise expressly provided in this Act, nothing in this Act is to be taken as requiring a medical practitioner to carry out a blood-sampling in respect of any person.
59
Avoidance of certain provisions in insurance contracts
59 Avoidance of certain provisions in insurance contracts
A provision of a contract or other agreement is void to the extent that it purports to exclude or limit the liability of an insurer under a contract of insurance in the event of a vessel owner or vessel operator –
(a) being convicted of an offence under this Act; or
(b) having alcohol in his or her breath or blood, or more than a specified concentration of alcohol in his or her breath or blood, as indicated by breath test, breath analysis or blood-sampling under this Act.
60
Service of documents
60 Service of documents
Except as is otherwise expressly provided in this Act, a notice or other document is effectively given to or served on a person under this Act if –
(a) in the case of a natural person, it is –
(i) handed to the person; or
(ii) left at, or sent by post to, the person's postal or residential address or place of business or employment last known to the giver or server of the notice or document; or
(iii) faxed to the person's fax number; or
(iv) emailed to the person's email address; and
(b) in the case of any other person, it is –
(i) left at, or sent by post to, the person's principal or registered office or principal place of business; or
(ii) faxed to the person's fax number; or
(iii) emailed to the person's email address.
61
Regulations
61 Regulations
(1) The Governor may make regulations for the purposes of this Act.
(2) Without limiting the generality of subsection (1) , the regulations may –
(a) provide for fees and charges payable in respect of any matter under the Act; and
(b) prescribe, or provide for the form and content of, forms; and
(c) prescribe, for this Act, any matter that corresponds to a matter in respect of which regulations may be made under the Corresponding Act.
(3) The regulations may be made so as to apply differently according to such factors as are specified in the regulations.
(5) Regulations made under section 31 of the Corresponding Act for or in respect of any provision or matter under that Act may also be used and have application for the purposes of a corresponding provision or matter under this Act and, to that end, those regulations may, if necessary or expedient, be modified or adapted so as to enable those regulations to have such use or application.
Sourced from Tasmanian Legislation Online (legislation.tas.gov.au), CC BY 4.0.
Part 1 Preliminary
Part 1 Preliminary
Division 1 Title and commencement
Division 1 Title and commencement
1 Short title
1 Short title
This Act may be cited as the Marine Safety (Misuse of Alcohol) Act 2006 .
2 Commencement
2 Commencement
This Act commences on a day to be proclaimed.
Division 2 Interpretation
Division 2 Interpretation
3 Interpretation
3 Interpretation
In this Act, unless the contrary intention appears –
adult means a person who has attained the age of 18 years;
approved analyst – see section 8(3) ;
approved operator – see section 8(4) ;
blood-sampling means the taking of a sample of a person's blood;
breath analysing instrument means a breath analysing instrument within the meaning of the Corresponding Act;
breath analysis has the same meaning as in the Corresponding Act;
breath test has the same meaning as in the Corresponding Act;
commercial purposes includes –
(a) the purposes of a passenger transport or ferry service, whether for paying or non-paying passengers; and
(b) research purposes;
commercial vessel means a vessel, other than a fishing vessel, that is being operated for commercial purposes;
, in relation to an offence, includes a finding of guilt without the recording of a conviction for the offence;
Evidence and sentencing mechanics: the Act creates presumptions about measured concentrations (s 50), specifies when breath analysis results are admissible (s 51), recognises evidentiary certificates and records (s 54 and Sch 1) and sets service rules for those certificates (s 55). Sentencing mechanics include mandatory fines and disqualification periods linked to measured concentrations for the primary offences listed in a schedule to s 41, with courts required to impose the tabled fine and disqualification subject to relief for special circumstances (s 41(2)-(4)). For other offences and obstructive conduct the court may impose disqualification up to 3 years (s 42). Disqualified persons are prohibited from operating vessels contrary to orders (s 43) and may apply for a restricted mariners certificate under strict procedural requirements (Div 6, ss 46-47).
Implicit statutory purpose and the instruments used: while the Act does not contain a separate statement of legislative policy in the text supplied, its structure and provisions indicate a legislative aim of reducing alcohol-impaired operation of vessels and providing police and courts with tools to detect, deter and prosecute such conduct. It does that by (i) setting per se rules tied to measurable concentrations, (ii) empowering compulsory testing with time-bound rules (notably the 3-hour window), (iii) creating administrative linkages with MAST (notification duties; s 41(8)), and (iv) shaping evidentiary and procedural pathways that facilitate prosecutions (presumptions, evidentiary certificates, service rules).
The rest of this note unpacks the Act’s main legal concepts, who bears compliance costs and enforcement burdens, the duties and rights created, penalties and enforcement mechanics, interactions with other legislation, recorded amendment history in the text, litigation-relevant features embedded in the Act, routine practical pitfalls to watch for, and concrete compliance steps for operators, owners, MAST, police and medical practitioners, with citations to the Act.
Main concepts
Definitions and thresholds
Permitted concentration. The Act defines "permitted concentration" as 0.05 g alcohol in 210 litres of breath or 0.05 g alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (s 3). That number is the statutory limit that applies to vessels other than commercial vessels (Div 2, s 16-17).
"Alcohol in the breath or blood" as per se rule for commercial vessels. For commercial vessels the test is conceptualised as presence: a person must not operate a commercial vessel if there is alcohol in the person's breath or blood (s 13). No numerical threshold is specified for commercial vessels in s 13(1).
"Relevant time." The Act pins the "relevant time" to the time the person is first required to submit to a breath test (or, in certain sections, the first time they are required to submit to a breath analysis or blood-sampling) (s 4). The relevant time is critical for timing defences and the 3-hour rules for blood sampling (s 25).
"Owner" and "in charge." The Act takes a broad approach to who counts as owner (registered owner, joint owner, charterer, lessee, hirer, person publicly representing authority, director or manager of a corporate owner) (s 5). Who is "in charge" is set out by factual tests including being the only adult aboard, purporting to be in charge without contradiction, or having ultimate command; there is a presumption that an owner aboard and qualified by a mariners certificate had ultimate command unless the owner proves otherwise (s 6).
Testing regime and approved roles
Breath test, breath analysis, blood-sampling. The Act distinguishes between a preliminary breath test (s 18) and a breath analysis (s 18-19) carried out on a breath analysing instrument by an approved operator. Blood-sampling is the bodily sampling alternative (ss 23, 28, 30-35).
Approved analysts and operators. Persons approved as analysts or operators under the Corresponding Act (the Road Safety (Alcohol and Drugs) Act 1970) are treated as approved under this Act too (s 8(3)-(4)). The Act allows regulations to prescribe functions for approved analysts concerning maintenance, testing, training and records for breath analysing instruments (s 8(2)).
Police powers and limits
When police can require testing. Police may require a breath test whenever it appears a person is, or has just ceased, operating a vessel (s 18). If reasonable suspicion exists, police may require a breath analysis (s 19). Where a maritime accident has occurred and a police officer reasonably suspects a person was aboard a vessel involved, police may require breath analysis or blood-sampling irrespective of whether the person was operating the vessel (s 20).
Detention and custody for non‑compliance. A person who fails to submit may be taken into custody and detained as necessary to enable the testing requirement to be imposed (s 22). There are associated criminal penalties for failure to comply (s 21) and for refusing an analysis while in custody where no alternative election has been made (s 24).
Time limits and practicability. Liability to submit to breath analysis or blood-sampling expires 3 hours after the relevant time if not begun (s 25). Police must have regard to the 3-hour limit and to practicability when requiring a test (s 25(2)), and the approved operator need not offer the blood election if they do not believe blood-sampling could be practicably begun within 3 hours (s 23(4)).
Evidence, presumptions and admissibility
Presumptions about concentration. The Act creates statutory presumptions that a sample of blood taken in accordance with the Act reflects the actual concentration when taken, that a properly carried out breath analysis reflects the breath concentration at the time analysed, and that blood evidence prevails over breath when in conflict (s 50(1)). Further, concentrations established within 4 hours after the relevant time are taken to be the concentration at the relevant act unless the opposite is proved (s 50(2)).
Admissibility conditions for breath evidence. Breath analysis evidence is inadmissible unless the prescribed statement was read and handed to the subject on completion (s 29(1); s 51(a)), and, if a blood-sampling request was made under s 29(2), either the blood sample was taken within 3 hours or the subject refused the blood-sampling after arrangements were made (s 51(b)).
Evidentiary certificates and records. Schedule 1 lists certificates and records that are prima facie evidence of matters contained (s 54; Sch 1). There are prescribed service rules: an evidentiary certificate or record must be served on the opposing party at least 14 days before hearing unless the court allows otherwise (s 55).
Sanctions and administrative outcomes
Fixed penalties and disqualification table. Section 41 prescribes fines in penalty units and mandatory disqualification periods tied to ranges of measured concentrations for offences specified in the s 41 table. The court must impose tabled fines and disqualifications unless special circumstances justify lesser sanctions (s 41(2)-(3)). For other offences and obstructive offences, s 42 allows discretionary disqualification up to 3 years.
Restricted mariners certificates. The Act provides a structured process for a disqualified person to apply for a restricted mariners certificate in limited circumstances of severe and unusual hardship (ss 46-47), with criteria the court must be satisfied about and explicit exclusions (s 47(2)).
Inter-agency and legal relationships
Corresponding Act interaction. The Act imports standards and approved persons from the Road Safety (Alcohol and Drugs) Act 1970 and permits regulations that correspond to regulations under that Act (s 8(3)-(4), s 61(5)).
Insurance and Crown. The Act voids any insurance provision that seeks to exclude or limit an insurer’s liability on grounds of conviction or measured alcohol (s 59). The Act binds the Crown (s 12) and provides limited Crown immunity against liability for good-faith acts of police exercising powers under ss 36 and 39 (s 36(5), s 39(4)).
These concepts combine to create a regime that is measurement-focused (breath or blood), time-sensitive (relevant time and 3-hour windows), evidence-led (presumptions, certificates and service rules), and administrative (MAST notification, potential suspension/cancellation of local mariners certificates).
Who it affects
Primary regulated persons
Vessel operators. The Act directly targets persons operating vessels as defined (s 3, s 10). For commercial vessels, any alcohol presence in breath or blood is prohibited while operating (s 13). For non-commercial vessels, the permitted concentration (0.05) applies (s 16). The definition of "operating" includes being aboard and in charge or exerting any degree of control over steering or propulsion (s 3).
Owners and persons in charge. Owners (broadly defined to include registered owners, charterers, lessees, persons with rights to exercise powers of an owner, directors, and managers; s 5) and persons in charge carry duties not to cause or allow intoxicated persons to operate vessels (ss 14, 17). Employers, skippers and organisers of charter or ferry services fall within this ambit because of the 'owner' and 'person in charge' definitions and can be fined for first, second and subsequent offences with escalating penalties (ss 14(1), 14(2), 17(1), 17(2)).
Secondary affected groups
Passengers and crew. The Act permits police to direct persons aboard vessels to take certain actions to ensure safety (s 36(1)(l)-(m); s 39(2)(b)) and creates potential penalties for failing to comply with directions (s 36(4)). Passengers and crew may therefore be detained, moved ashore, or otherwise directed during enforcement activity.
Medical practitioners, nurses and ambulance officers. The Act imposes duties on medical practitioners and nurses to carry out blood-sampling where requested by police unless it would be prejudicial to proper care (s 30(2)-(3)), and to follow procedural requirements when performing samplings (s 32). Ambulance officers are specifically defined for the purposes of safety protections (s 27(5)).
Approved analysts and operators. Persons approved under the Corresponding Act gain functions under this Act (s 8(3)-(4)). Approved analysts have prescribed functions relating to instrument maintenance, training and record-keeping (s 8(2)), and approved operators perform breath analysis and must follow the prescribed way of operating instruments (s 29(1), Sch 1(1), Sch 1(6)).
MAST and the Commissioner/MAST administration. MAST is a recipient of court sentencing notices (s 41(8)) and has functions in issuing local and restricted mariners certificates (ss 46-47). The Act places administrative duties on MAST when a court reports convictions or when courts order suspension/cancellation (s 41(5), s 42(4)).
Police. The Act grants police extensive investigatory and operational powers at sea and on vessels: hailing/signalling, directing speed/direction, boarding and remaining on vessels, inspection for engines, directing surrender of keys, detaining vessels and persons, and directing who may operate the vessel or removing the vessel to safety (s 36 and s 39). Police are the primary decision-makers in imposing test requirements (ss 18-20) and detention under s 22.
Insurers. The Act voids contractual provisions that exclude or limit insurer liability on the grounds of conviction or measured alcohol (s 59). Insurers must therefore accept policy coverage notwithstanding prosecutions or measured alcohol to the extent a contract attempted to avoid liability.
Courts. Magistrates and higher courts exercise sentencing and disqualification powers, apply the presumptions at s 50, deal with evidentiary certificates and service timing at s 55, and hear applications for restricted mariners certificates (Div 6).
Practical distribution of costs and decision authority
Who pays. Operators and owners face immediate compliance costs (avoiding alcohol, training, supervision), potential fines and disqualification. Police and MAST bear enforcement and administrative costs (resourcing breath analysing instruments, approved operator/analyst regimes, notification). Medical practitioners and hospitals bear procedural burdens when asked to take or use diagnostic blood samples (ss 30-33, 58).
Who decides. Police decide on the spot whether to require tests and whether to detain; approved operators decide when to offer blood election (s 23(3)-(4)); courts decide on disqualification and whether to issue restricted certificates; MAST decides on issuing certificates and may be authorised by regulation to determine matters (s 61(4)). The Act delegates technical decisions about instruments to approved analysts and to regulations that may track the Corresponding Act (s 8(2), s 61(5)).
Behavioural effects on private actors
Owners and operators must adopt policies to prevent operation by intoxicated persons, train staff to recognise in-charge status and to ensure a competent adult is available where that may be a defence for non-commercial vessels (s 16(2)). Employers and commercial operators face low tolerance (per se presence test) and thus are likely to adopt zero-tolerance workplace rules. Medical officers and hospitals must be prepared to receive requests for blood-sampling and to document their reasons if they refuse on clinical grounds (s 30-31).
Regulatory ripple effects
The Act imports and cross-uses regulatory content from the Road Safety (Alcohol and Drugs) Act 1970 (the Corresponding Act) for approved persons and operating ways (s 8, s 61(5)). Therefore administrative burdens and technical standards may be synchronised with road-based alcohol testing rules, aligning maritime and road enforcement procedures.
Key duties and rights
Duties imposed on persons and organisations
No operation while alcohol present (commercial). A person must not operate a commercial vessel if there is alcohol in their breath or blood (s 13(1)). This imposes a strict per se prohibition with limited defences for emergency operation (s 13(2)).
No operation above permitted concentration (non-commercial). A person must not operate a non-commercial vessel if their breath or blood shows more than the permitted concentration (s 16(1)). Defences include presence of another competent adult with overall control (s 16(2)) and emergency exceptions (s 16(3)).
Owners and persons in charge must not cause or allow operation. Owners and persons in charge must not cause or allow persons with alcohol in breath/blood to operate commercial vessels (s 14(1)-(2)), and analogous prohibitions with specified penalty units apply for non-commercial vessels (s 17).
Submit to tests and obey directions. Persons liable under Division 1 of Part 3 must submit to breath tests, breath analyses and blood-sampling and must comply with directions to enable those procedures (s 21(2)-(3)). There are criminal penalties for failure to comply (s 21(2)).
Follow blood sampling procedure. Medical practitioners and nurses who carry out blood-sampling must follow prescribed manner and labelling, divide the sample into three parts, secure containers issued by an approved analyst, and deliver samples appropriately (s 32).
Observe police directions and comply with procedural duties. Persons must not fail to comply with police directions given under s 36 (s 36(4)). Police must have regard to weather, safety and not detain any person/vessel longer than necessary (s 37).
Rights and protections in the Act
Right to be informed and to elect blood-sampling. A person required to submit to breath analysis who is detained must be informed that they may elect to submit to blood-sampling instead, and that election must be facilitated if practicable within 3 hours (ss 23(3)-(5), 29(1)-(3)). After breath analysis a prescribed written statement must be read over and handed to the person (s 29(1)(a)) and that statement is a precondition for breath evidence being admissible (s 51).
Reasonable excuse and medical protections. There are statutory defences where medical or physical conditions render it impracticable or unsafe to submit to procedures, but the court must be satisfied by medical evidence of that fact (s 21(5), s 28(5)). Section 27 protects patients receiving first aid or medical treatment by requiring police to consult treating medical staff and not impose testing where treating staff indicate it is unsafe; any requirement contrary to s 27 is void and its results inadmissible (s 27(2)-(3)).
Procedural rights around evidentiary material. The Act provides that evidentiary certificates are prima facie evidence but requires service at least 14 days before hearing unless the court approves otherwise (s 55(1)). A defendant may call and cross-examine the signatory of an evidentiary certificate if that person is called as a witness by the defendant (s 55(4)).
Right to apply for restricted mariners certificate. A person disqualified under a sentencing order may apply to a court of petty sessions for a restricted mariners certificate in cases of severe and unusual hardship; the court may issue certificates on terms (ss 46-47).
Discretion and delegation of decision-making
Police discretion in testing and directions. Police have broad discretion to require breath tests when it appears a person is or has just ceased operating a vessel (s 18(1)-(3)), to require breath analysis on reasonable suspicion (s 19), and to detain persons for enforcement purposes (s 22). The Act also allows police to take steps they reasonably consider necessary to ensure vessel safety, including operating or towing a vessel to a place of safety (s 39(2)(c)).
Court discretion on penalties and certificates. The court must impose tabled fines and disqualifications in s 41 for specified offences, but may reduce them for special circumstances (s 41(3)); the court has broad discretion under s 42 to disqualify up to 3 years and under ss 46-47 to permit restricted certificates subject to conditions.
Compliance obligations on agencies and third parties
MAST notification and administrative duties. Courts must send copies or notice of sentencing orders to MAST (s 41(8)), and MAST may inform corresponding maritime authorities (s 41(8), s 49). MAST must issue restricted mariners certificates when the court orders and fees are paid (s 47(4)).
Insurance contracts. The Act imposes a statutory restriction on contract terms: contractual provisions that exclude or limit insurer liability because of conviction or measured alcohol are void to that extent (s 59).
Approved analyst/operator obligations. Approved analysts and operators must follow prescribed maintenance and operational standards and keep records, and approved operators must read and hand the prescribed statement after breath analysis (s 8(2), s 29(1)).
These duties and rights shape on-the-water operations, evidentiary strategies in prosecutions and defences, health‑care provider obligations, and insurance exposure. The Act balances intrusive testing powers with time limits, medical safeguards and procedural protections intended to manage risks around compulsory testing and sampling.
Penalties and enforcement
Offences and penalty structure
Direct operation offences. Operating a commercial vessel with any alcohol in breath or blood is an offence under s 13. Operating a non-commercial vessel with more than the permitted concentration is an offence under s 16. The Act references s 41 for penalties for these direct breaches (s 13(1), s 16(1)).
Owner/person-in-charge offences. Owners and persons in charge who cause or allow prohibited operation face escalating fines for repeat offending: for commercial vessels first offence up to 50 penalty units, second up to 100 units, third or subsequent up to 200 units (s 14(1)-(2)); for non-commercial vessels the scale is lower (25, 50, 100 penalty units) (s 17(1)-(2)).
Obstructive and related offences. Failing to submit to testing, failing to comply with directions, attempting to manipulate test results, refusing breath analysis while in custody, and refusing analysis of samples where notice was given are criminalised and carry fines and/or imprisonment (ss 21-28, 33, 38). For example, failure to submit to a breath test, breath analysis or blood-sampling without reasonable excuse carries a fine not exceeding 30 penalty units or imprisonment up to one month, or both (s 21(2)). Attempting to manipulate test results is similarly punishable (s 26).
Disqualification regime. Section 41 prescribes mandatory fines in penalty units and mandatory disqualification periods in months tied to measured concentration bands for offences specified in its table. The court must impose the tabled fine and disqualification in addition to any other penalty (s 41(2)). The table schedules both fines and disqualification periods, e.g., for an offence under s 13(1) with more than 0.200 g/210 L breath, a fine of 10 penalty units and disqualification of 15 months is indicated, subject to special-circumstances relief (s 41 table; s 41(3)-(4)). Section 42 allows discretionary disqualification of up to 3 years for offences not in s 41 or for obstructive offences.
Contravening disqualification or prohibited applications. It is an offence to operate contrary to a disqualification order (s 43) with fine up to 100 penalty units and continuing fines for ongoing breaches. It is an offence to apply for a local mariners certificate when prohibited by court order (s 44) with a fine up to 100 penalty units; an exception allows applying for a restricted mariners certificate under Division 6 during a prohibition (s 44(3)).
Enforcement powers and sequences
Police test powers. Police have power to require breath tests where it appears a person is or has just ceased operating a vessel (s 18), to require breath analyses where reasonable suspicion exists (s 19), and to require breath analysis or blood-sampling of persons involved in maritime accidents (s 20). They may impose preliminary breath tests even when not underway and even without suspicion (s 18(3)).
Detention and custody for enforcement. Where an individual refuses or fails to submit or is likely not to comply, police may take the person into custody, convey them to an appropriate place and detain them for so long as necessary to enable imposition of a requirement for breath analysis or blood-sampling (s 22(2)). Custody carries criminal exposure if the person attempts to escape or obstructs conveyance (s 22(3)). A person in custody who is liable to submit to breath analysis must not refuse that analysis unless they have validly elected blood-sampling and it can be practicably carried out within 3 hours (ss 23-24).
Police powers over vessels and persons. Section 36 grants police a broad set of ancillary powers including hailing/signalling vessels, ordering changes of course/speed, boarding, inspecting for engines, directing surrender of keys/lanyards, directing persons to remain on vessels or structures, detaining vessels to establish identity, and directing persons at maritime accident scenes. Failure to comply with police directions is itself an offence (s 36(4)). Section 39 permits police to direct persons not to operate vessels and to take steps to secure vessel safety if no legal operator is available (s 39(2)(c)).
Limits on police powers. The Act imposes duties on police when exercising powers: have regard to weather conditions; not endanger safety of persons or vessels; not detain beyond reasonable necessity; and not to direct a commercial or fishing vessel outside its usual or scheduled area without good cause (s 37(1)). Police must, as far as practicable, carry out breath tests promptly and at or near where the requirement was imposed (s 37(2)). Nevertheless, s 37(3) confirms that failure of duty under s 37 does not invalidate a police action.
Evidentiary and procedural enforcement features
Presumptions favouring prosecution. Section 50 creates presumptions that measured concentrations reflect actual concentrations at the time of sampling and that concentrations measured within 4 hours can be taken to be the concentration at the time of the relevant act of operating a vessel, unless contrary is proved (s 50(1)-(3)). Blood analysis evidence prevails over breath where conflict exists (s 50(1)(c)). These presumptions shift evidentiary burdens in ways that materially affect prosecutorial proof strategies.
Admissibility pre-conditions. Breath analysis evidence is inadmissible unless the prescribed statement was read and handed to the subject on completion (s 29(1); s 51(a)), and, if a person requested a blood-sampling after breath analysis, the blood sampling was commenced within 3 hours or the subject refused blood sampling after arrangements were made (s 51(b)). The evidentiary certificate regime (Sch 1; s 54) and the 14-day service requirement for tendering such certificates (s 55(1)) shape timing and disclosure practices for prosecutions.
Notification and administrative consequences. Courts must notify MAST of sentencing orders (s 41(8)), and MAST may inform corresponding maritime authorities (s 41(8), s 49). Courts may also suspend or cancel local mariners certificates or impose application prohibitions as part of sentences (s 41(5), s 42(4)).
Operational protections and liabilities
Crown immunity for good-faith acts. The Crown is not liable for damage caused to vessels or property resulting from good-faith exercise of police powers under s 36(1) or s 39(2)(c) (s 36(5), s 39(4)). This shifts the risk of damage arising from enforcement operations away from the Crown in good-faith contexts, while still permitting civil remedies outside the Act in other circumstances.
Insurance contract restrictions. Section 59 voids any provision in contracts that purports to exclude or limit insurer liability where the insured is convicted or has alcohol in breath/blood as indicated by tests under this Act, limiting insurers’ contractual defences.
In sum, enforcement combines on-water police discretion and tactical testing powers with statutory presumptions, a structured evidentiary regime, mandatory sentencing consequences for certain measurement bands, and administrative outcomes affecting mariners' certificates. Compliance failures can lead to criminal penalties, administrative disqualification and interruption of commercial maritime business.
How it interacts with other laws
Correspondence with the Road Safety (Alcohol and Drugs) Act 1970 (the Corresponding Act)
Approval and operational standards. The Act explicitly imports the concept of a breath analysing instrument, breath analysis, breath test, and approved operators and analysts from the Corresponding Act (s 3; s 8(3)-(4)). An approved analyst or operator under the Corresponding Act is an approved analyst/operator under this Act (s 8(3)-(4)).
Regulations and standards interchange. Section 61(5) permits regulations made under section 31 of the Corresponding Act to be used and applied to corresponding provisions in this Act, with such modification as may be necessary. Section 61 also allows the regulations under this Act to prescribe matters that correspond to the Corresponding Act and authorises the Commissioner of Police or an approved analyst to have matters determined from time to time by regulation (s 61(2), s 61(4)). Practically, this creates a regulatory bridge so technical standards (e.g., approved ways of operating instruments, maintenance standards, training requirements) can be aligned with road-testing rules.
Evidence Act and other evidence law interactions
Evidence Act limitation. Section 56 expressly excludes s 177A of the Evidence Act 2001 from applying to evidentiary certificates and records under this Act. Section 54 and Schedule 1 establish that specified certificates and records are prima facie evidence (s 54; Sch 1). Section 55 imposes service timing for tendering such certificates (s 55(1)). Together these provisions create a bespoke evidentiary framework for breath and blood evidence that operates parallel to, and in some respects supersedes, general evidence law.
Criminal law interlocks. The Act defines certain offences and prescribes investigatory powers that interact with criminal procedure rules. For example, detention under s 22 and use of blood samples obtained under medical treatment (s 30(4)) may intersect with statutory rules about detention, searches and admissibility under other criminal laws. Schedule 2 lists consequential amendments affecting other Acts (Criminal Law (Detention and Interrogation) Act 1995; Justices Act 1959; Road Safety (Alcohol and Drugs) Act 1970; Victims of Crime Compensation Act 1994; Youth Justice Act 1997), indicating legislative intent that the new regime integrate with those statutes.
Administrative law and maritime regulation
MAST and mariners certificates. The Act operates within the maritime administrative structure. MAST is the central agency for local mariners certificates, receives notices of convictions (s 41(8)), may inform corresponding authorities (s 49), and must issue restricted mariners certificates when the court so orders (s 47(4)). Administration of the Act is placed with the Minister for Police and Emergency Management pending Administrative Arrangements orders (s 62), preserving a link between maritime safety regulation and policing functions.
Extra-territorial application. The Act may apply to acts done wholly or partly outside Tasmania if there is a real and substantial link to Tasmania (s 11). That provision allows the Act to reach cross-border maritime conduct where significant parts of the conduct occurred in Tasmania or substantial harmful effects arose in Tasmania. This will interact with the reach of other States’ maritime laws.
Insurance and contracts
Insurance contract constraint. Section 59 voids any contractual provision that seeks to exclude or limit insurer liability because of conviction or measured alcohol under this Act. That means insurers cannot rely on policy exclusions to avoid claims where the insured has been convicted or has alcohol in breath or blood as indicated under this Act. This interacts with insurance law principles and could affect underwriting and premium-setting practices for vessel owners.
Medical and health law
Medical practitioner duties and patient protection. The Act places duties on medical practitioners to carry out blood-sampling on request where a person liable to submit is being treated and consent is not possible (s 30(2)-(3)), but also protects clinical judgment where sampling would be prejudicial to care (s 30(3); s 31). Section 27 places an overriding constraint where first aid/medical treatment is being administered, requiring police to consult treating staff and making contrary requirements void and inadmissible (s 27(2)-(4)). These provisions interact with clinical duty-of-care and hospital policies.
Procedural and judicial interaction
Service and pre-trial disclosure. Section 55 requires evidentiary certificates to be served on the other party at least 14 days before hearing unless the court approves otherwise. Section 50’s presumptions and s 51’s admissibility conditions will shape prosecution disclosure practices and defence preparation. Courts retain the power to vary evidentiary and sentencing consequences per s 41(3) and s 42.
Taken together, the Act does not exist in isolation. It imports technical regulatory content, evidentiary standards and approved personnel regimes from road-safety alcohol laws, creates interplay with criminal procedure and evidence law (with some provisions overriding general evidence rules), and affects insurance and administrative maritime systems through MAST and the broader set of consequential amendments listed in Schedule 2.
Amendment history
The statutory text contains in-line amendment notes identifying a limited set of amendments to specific sections. The Act as supplied includes the following recorded amendments and application dates:
Section 3 (Definitions): Amended by No. 3 of 2010, Schedule 1, applied 01 July 2010. The text includes the 2010 amendment footnote next to s 3. Further amendments to s 3 are recorded as No. 38 of 2017, s 57, applied 03 December 2018; and No. 31 of 2013, s 25, applied 02 September 2013. These annotations appear alongside definitions such as "nurse" and "vessel". The legislative text embeds these amendment notes where the definitions were altered (s 3).
Section 8 (Approved analysts and approved operators): Subsection (1) is noted as omitted by No. 38 of 2017, s 58, applied 03 December 2018. Subsection (2) was amended by the same 2017 instrument; subsections (2) and (4) bear the same amendment footnotes (No. 38 of 2017, s 58, applied 03 December 2018).
Section 25 and Section 37/61 alterations: Section 61(4) was amended by No. 38 of 2017, s 59, applied 03 December 2018, authorising matters to be determined from time to time by the Commissioner of Police or an approved analyst.
Section 32(6) and Section 34(6) are annotated as amended by No. 66 of 2007, Schedule 1, applied 31 December 2008. Section 35(3) and 35(6) also bear amendment notes by No. 66 of 2007, Schedule 1, applied 31 December 2008. These changes relate to the handling and analysis of blood samples and the delivery and provision of reports.
Schedule 1 (Part 1 Certificates): Amended by No. 38 of 2017, s 60, applied 03 December 2018, updating the certificate forms and signatory characterisations as an approved analyst or under the Corresponding Act.
The Act’s Schedule 2 lists consequential amendments to various statutes (Criminal Law (Detention and Interrogation) Act 1995; Justices Act 1959; Marine Safety (Misuse of Alcohol) Act 2006 [self-referential entry]; Road Safety (Alcohol and Drugs) Act 1970; Victims of Crime Compensation Act 1994; Youth Justice Act 1997). The presence of Schedule 2 indicates parliamentary intent to coordinate the Act’s enforcement and procedural measures across existing statutes, though the Schedule here is a list rather than the text of amendments.
No other amendment instruments, explanatory memoranda, or second-reading statements are included in the supplied text. The amendment notes present in the statutory text identify the legislative changes that have been incorporated and give the dates those amendments were applied.
For practitioners, the recorded amendments highlight technical changes to approved operator/analyst arrangements, blood-sampling handling and reporting rules, and the delegation/authorisation capacity in the regulations , each of which affects operational compliance (approved personnel, sample handling chain-of-custody, and delegated regulatory determinations). Where a regulation or court practice depends on the modified provisions, practitioners should check the cited amending instruments (No. 66 of 2007; No. 3 of 2010; No. 31 of 2013; No. 38 of 2017) and the applied dates to ensure historical compliance and transitional arrangements are respected.
Litigation history
The text of the Act supplied contains no reported cases, judicial opinions or litigation summaries. The Act itself sets evidentiary frameworks and presumptions designed for use in prosecutions and civil-implicating proceedings, but it does not record judicial interpretations.
What the Act does supply that will shape litigation and courtroom strategy
Evidence presumptions (s 50) and admissibility rules (s 51). These provisions create statutory evidentiary presumptions: measured concentrations in properly obtained blood samples and properly carried out breath analyses are to be taken as actual concentrations unless rebutted on the balance of probabilities (s 50(1)-(2)). Section 50(3) further establishes a presumption that if alcohol was present within 4 hours after the relevant time, the person had alcohol at the time of the relevant act of operating a vessel unless the contrary is proved. These presumptions will be the pivot of prosecutorial cases and the principal focus of defence challenges (e.g., timing, sampling chain-of-custody, medical conditions affecting measurement, or establishing that concentrations were below the permitted concentration at the relevant time).
Prima facie evidentiary certificates (s 54 and Sch 1). The Act contemplates that many technical matters will be proved by certificates and records rather than by live witness testimony. Schedule 1 lists categories of certificates (operator certificates, medical sampling certificates, chain-of-custody certificates, analysis reports) that are prima facie evidence. Section 55 imposes pre-hearing service requirements for those certificates. Challenges in litigation will likely focus on whether the certificate was properly issued, served in time and whether the certificate's contents are rebutted on the balance of probabilities.
Admissibility checks. Section 51 makes admissibility of breath results conditional on receipt by the subject of the prescribed statement and on the availability of a blood-sampling avenue where requested. Section 29 prescribes the actions an approved operator must take when a breath analysis is completed (read and hand over the written statement; inform re blood-sampling request if practicable). Failure in these procedural steps results in inadmissibility , this creates defence opportunities in litigated cases.
Procedural timing and the 3-hour window. Section 25 sets a firm 3-hour rule for commencement of breath analysis or blood sampling before liability expires. The approved operator need not offer blood election if they do not believe blood-sampling could be started practicably within 3 hours (s 23(4)). Disputes will arise around when the "relevant time" was, whether sampling began within the window, whether police acted with reasonable promptness, and whether sample integrity was preserved in the intervening period.
Limitations on admissibility in civil and contract proceedings. Section 57 excludes a conviction under Parts 2 or 3 as evidence in proceedings to establish a person was drunk or incapable of operating a vessel, and voids contractual exclusion clauses to the extent they attempt to use such evidence (s 57(1), s 57(3)). This will frame civil litigation and insurance claims, for example by preventing automatic contractual exclusions based solely on conviction or test results under the Act.
Anticipated litigation themes (based on statutory design)
Challenges to admissibility based on procedural non‑compliance: failure to read or hand the s 29 statement; failure to offer practicable blood sampling within 3 hours (s 23(4)); improper labelling or chain-of-custody in s 32; improper service of evidentiary certificates (s 55).
Challenges to timing and causation: establishing the "relevant time" (s 4), reliance on s 50's 4-hour presumption, and disputes regarding consumption patterns and blood alcohol kinetics.
Medical defences and clinical evidence: medical evidence may be required to establish that testing was unsafe or impracticable (s 21(5), s 28(5)), and medical practitioners bear duties and evidentiary obligations when refusing or performing blood sampling (ss 30-32).
Administrative and certificate-related litigation: disputes over disqualification orders, restricted mariners certificate applications, and MAST actions to suspend/cancel mariners certificates (ss 41, 46-48).
Because the Act provides the evidentiary framework and presumption mechanics, actual litigation outcomes and interpretive rules will develop through court application of these statutory clauses. Practitioners should expect that case law will address how strictly courts apply the procedural preconditions (s 29, s 51), how the 3-hour and 4-hour windows are interpreted in specific contexts, and the proper scope of police duties under s 37. The absence of recorded cases in the statutory text means practitioners must look to contemporaneous judicial decisions interpreting these specific provisions to understand evolving litigation strategy and precedent.
Gotchas
Timing, thresholds and the "relevant time"
Counting hours: the Act anchors many procedural rights and liabilities to the "relevant time" (s 4). The window for commencing breath analysis or blood-sampling is 3 hours from the relevant time (s 25(1)), and the 4‑hour evidentiary presumption in s 50 turns on measurements taken within 4 hours of the relevant time. In practice, disputes commonly arise over when the relevant time starts (first requirement to submit to breath test or breath analysis). If police or approved operators do not document that trigger moment carefully, the 3- and 4-hour windows may be contested.
Blood election practicability. Approved operators need not offer the person the option to elect blood-sampling if they do not believe a blood-sampling could be practicably begun within 3 hours (s 23(4)). That discretion is factual and may be scrutinised; if an operator incorrectly declines to inform the subject of the election, the person could later argue a procedural breach affecting admissibility (s 51).
Breath analysis admissibility trap. Breath analysis evidence is inadmissible unless the prescribed statement was read and handed over on completion (ss 29(1)(a), 51(a)). Failure to comply , even if the analytic device shows a concentration above the limit , may render breath evidence inadmissible and undermine a prosecution.
Blood chain-of-custody and labelling. Section 32 prescribes detailed sample handling: dividing into three parts, enclosing in approved containers, labelling in the prescribed manner, delivering one to the subject and sending two to an approved analyst within 10 days (s 32(3)-(6)). Deviations from this chain-of-custody create evidentiary challenges and may permit successful defence attacks.
Presumption favouring blood over breath. Where blood and breath conflict, s 50(1)(c) gives priority to blood evidence. Defence counsel must be alert to the order in which tests are performed and to opportunities to obtain independent analysis of preserved blood samples under Sch 1 and s 35(3).
Owner liability stretches beyond registered owner. The definition of "owner" is broad (s 5), including charterers, lessees, directors and those publicly representing authority. Organisations and managers may therefore face liability even where they are not the registered owner. Contractual arrangements and operational delegations should be reviewed.
Defences are factual and narrowly drawn. Emergency defences (s 13(2), s 14(4), s 16(3), s 17(4)) require the defendant to establish necessity, unrelatedness of the emergency to the defendant’s conduct, and that operation did not last longer than reasonably necessary. The defence that an owner did not know and could not reasonably be expected to know that an operator was intoxicated is available (ss 14(3), 17(3)), but it is a fact-bound inquiry that requires documentary and witness evidence to support an honest belief that was reasonable in the circumstances.
Police duty not to endanger: not an automatic invalidation. Section 37 imposes duties on police to have regard to weather, safety, detention duration and not to direct ships outside usual routes without cause. However, s 37(3) states that failure of duty does not invalidate the exercise of power. This reduces the opportunity to rely on s 37 as a means of excluding evidence, though it will remain relevant to fairness and to judicial assessment of police conduct.
Insurance contract clauses void to extent of exclusion. Section 59 voids contractual exclusions that seek to avoid liability because of conviction or measured alcohol under this Act. Insurers will need to structure policies and underwriting to account for this statutory limitation.
Evidentiary certificates service requirement. An evidentiary certificate or record cannot be tendered by a party unless a copy has been served on the other party at least 14 days before the hearing (s 55(1)), unless the court approves a shorter period. Failure to observe service timing can delay or derail prosecution reliance on certificates.
Disqualification consequences follow table but court can vary for special circumstances. Section 41 requires the court to impose the fines and disqualification periods in the table for specified offences, though s 41(3) permits the court to impose lesser sanctions where special circumstances exist. The mandatory tabled figures limit sentencing flexibility, and their practical impact on employability and commercial licences can be significant.
Restricted mariners certificate exceptions. The Act allows a disqualified person to apply for a restricted mariners certificate in cases of severe and unusual hardship (ss 46-47). However, s 47(2) lists exclusions where the court must not grant an order (e.g., offences committed during or within 3 years after disqualification, or where measured concentration was ≥ 0.200 g/210 L). Applicants must follow extensive application requirements (s 46(3)), including 10-year conviction history disclosures and verification by statutory declaration.
Practical enforcement risks
Police operational decisions and Crown liability. The Crown is insulated from liability for damage caused by police exercising powers under s 36(1) and s 39(2)(c) in good faith (s 36(5), s 39(4)). Owners should therefore anticipate that enforcement operations may cause damage for which compensation is not guaranteed under the Act; civil claims would hinge on establishing bad faith or negligence outside the scope of s 36(5).
Extra-territorial complexity. Section 11 allows the Act to apply to conduct partly outside Tasmania where there is a real and substantial link. Determining that link in cross-border incidents requires evidence of substantial harmful effects or significant local conduct, which can complicate jurisdictional questions.
For practitioners, these "gotchas" turn on precise timing, documentation and adherence to the prescribed procedures for informing subjects, offering alternatives, handling samples, and serving evidentiary documents. Defence and prosecution strategies will pivot on the small but consequential procedural points the Act makes mandatory.
How to comply
Immediate practical steps for vessel operators and owners
Adopt a zero‑tolerance policy for commercial operations and a strict 0.05 policy for non-commercial operations. For commercial operations the Act is absolute: any alcohol presence is prohibited (s 13). Employers should implement workplace rules, pre-shift testing policies (where lawful and consistent with privacy and employment laws), and disciplinary measures. Narrow exceptions are confined to emergencies established on the facts (s 13(2)).
Ensure a competent adult is available where that is a reliance defence for non-commercial vessels. Section 16(2) provides a defence if another adult had overall control and was competent and below the permitted concentration. Owners/operators should roster and document competent replacements and handover procedures.
Operational and procedural preparations
Maintain breath‑analysing equipment and approved persons. Ensure breath analysing instruments are maintained, tested, and used as prescribed by regulations and under the supervision of approved analysts (s 8(2), Sch 1). Where the Corresponding Act prescribes approved operators and analysts, require staff to obtain the appropriate approvals (s 8(3)-(4)). Keep maintenance and calibration records as required by the regulations and by Schedule 1 certificate requirements.
Document chain-of-custody for blood samples. Follow s 32 precisely: divide blood sample into three parts, enclose in approved containers, label in the prescribed manner, tender one container to the subject or police, and deliver two to an approved analyst within 10 days. Maintain contemporaneous documentation so that Sch 1 certificates can be reliably produced.
Train crew and managers in legal duties and police directions. Crew should be trained to comply with police directions (s 36(4)) and to understand owner/person-in-charge duties (ss 14, 17). Owners should keep records showing steps taken to prevent intoxicated operation (e.g., rostering, signage, supervisor checks) so the "did not know and could not reasonably have been expected to know" defence (ss 14(3), 17(3)) can be supported if ever required.
Prepare for police enforcement scenarios. Keep accessible mariners certificates, certificates of survey and other documentation police may request to inspect (s 36(1)(j)-(k)). Establish a contact point and a procedure for responding to police directions to move or detain vessels, including plans to secure vessels and cargo if police direct temporary removal or towing (s 39(2)(c)).
Medical and hospital compliance
Medical practitioners and nurses should review duties and procedural limits. Where asked by police to take a blood sample under s 30, a medical practitioner must comply unless it would be prejudicial to the patient’s care (s 30(3)). If they refrain, s 31 requires a duty to provide opinions on whether the subject had alcohol at the time of hospital admission. Hospitals should adopt policies for responding to police requests, preserving existing diagnostic samples for potential evidentiary use (s 30(4)), and documenting their clinical judgment when declining sampling.
Ambulance services and first responders must be briefed on s 27 protections. Police cannot require testing of a person receiving first aid or medical treatment unless the treating professional has been informed and has been asked whether it is safe and indicates no objection (s 27(2)). Training should therefore include how to manage interactions between first responders and police to protect patient safety and evidentiary integrity.
Evidentiary and litigation preparedness
Maintain and serve evidentiary documents within statutory timeframes. Parties seeking to tender evidentiary certificates must serve copies on the other side at least 14 days before the hearing (s 55(1)). Prosecutors should calendar service deadlines to avoid exclusion of certificates. Defence teams should monitor service of certificates and prepare timely challenges where service deficiencies exist.
Preserve blood sample parts and request analysis when advisable. Sch 1 and s 35 permit analysis of blood samples and protect a second container from analysis except on joint written request or court order (s 35(3)). If a defendant wishes independent analysis, they should promptly engage counsel and seek joint requests or court directions as necessary to access the second container.
Use the 3-hour and 4-hour windows strategically. Counsel should substantiate the exact timing of the relevant time, when tests were commenced, and whether blood sampling was practicably available within 3 hours (s 23(4), s 25). Defence may seek to exploit late sampling, chain-of-custody gaps, or procedural failures under s 29 to exclude breath evidence (s 51).
Administrative and regulatory compliance for MAST and insurers
MAST must have processes for receiving court notices and for issuing or varying mariners certificates in light of disqualification orders (s 41(8), ss 46-47). MAST should also coordinate with corresponding maritime authorities when notified of convictions, as authorised by the Act (s 41(8), s 49).
Insurers must review policy wordings. Section 59 voids provisions attempting to exclude liability because of conviction or measured alcohol under this Act. Insurers should adjust underwriting, claims handling and premium-setting practices to reflect the statutory constraint and may need to amend policy terms to avoid futile exclusions.
Regulatory and records obligations
Regulations may modify technical obligations. Section 61 enables the Governor to make regulations setting forms, fees and prescribing matters corresponding to the Corresponding Act, and authorises the Commissioner of Police or approved analysts to be given determination powers. Entities should review the regulations that have been made under this Act and the Corresponding Act for technical compliance obligations (s 61(1)-(5)).
Keep accurate records and evidence. Approved operators must keep records as prescribed (s 8(2)(c); Sch 1 Part 2). Vessel operators and owners should maintain logs demonstrating training, alcohol policies, rostering and incident handling.
Practical checklist for avoidance and mitigation
For commercial operators: adopt zero-tolerance, pre-shift checks, and refusal-to-embark policies for any crew or operator with alcohol detected.
For non-commercial operators: ensure competent adult backup, avoid operating if at or above 0.05, and educate skippers about the strictness of the permitted concentration.
For owners and managers: implement documentation proving a reasonable system for preventing intoxicated operation to support the "did not know" defences (ss 14(3), 17(3)).
For all organisations: ensure compliance with breath-analysis apparatus maintenance and approved-operator standards, and keep chain-of-custody and servicing records for evidentiary purposes (s 8(2); s 32).
Following these steps reduces operational exposure, ensures readiness for police enforcement, preserves evidentiary integrity, and supports lawful exercise of rights under the Act. Practitioners should continually check the Regulations made under s 61 for technical requirements and any modifications adopted from the Corresponding Act.
Corresponding Act means the Road Safety (Alcohol and Drugs) Act 1970 ;
corresponding maritime authority means an office or body established under a law of another State or a Territory, or under a law of the Commonwealth, and having functions that correspond, or substantially correspond, to those of MAST;
disqualification order means an order under section 41(2)(b) or section 42(2) ;
evidentiary certificate means a certificate specified in Part 1 of Schedule 1 ;
evidentiary record means a record specified in Part 2 of Schedule 1 ;
fail, to submit to a procedure or comply with a direction, includes refusing to submit to the procedure or comply with the direction;
fishing vessel means a vessel that is being operated, other than under charter, for or in connection with the taking of fish for a commercial purpose other than marine farming;
functions includes duties;
in charge, of a vessel – see section 6 ;
liability, of a person to submit to a breath test, breath analysis or blood-sampling, means a liability that the person incurs because of –
(a) the operation of a provision of this Act; or
(b) a requirement of a police officer under this Act; or
(c) in the case of a blood-sampling under section 23 , the person's election to submit to the blood-sampling;
mariners certificate means a certificate, licence, permit or other document (however described) that –
(a) is issued by MAST or a corresponding maritime authority; and
(b) authorises the person to whom it is issued to operate a vessel in a particular capacity in accordance with the conditions specified in that certificate, licence, permit or other document;
maritime accident includes, but is not limited to –
(a) vessels colliding; and
(b) a vessel colliding with a navigational hazard; and
(c) a vessel colliding with the shore or a structure on shore; and
(d) a vessel running aground; and
(e) an accident, involving the use of a vessel, that results in the death or injury of any person or damage to property; and
(f) an explosion or outbreak of fire on a vessel; and
(g) a vessel sinking or capsizing;
MAST means the Marine and Safety Authority established under the Marine and Safety Authority Act 1997 ;
medical evidence means the evidence of one or more medical practitioners;
[Section 3 Amended by No. 3 of 2010, Sched. 1, Applied:01 Jul 2010][Section 3 Amended by No. 3 of 2010, Sched. 1, Applied:01 Jul 2010]
[Section 3 Amended by No. 3 of 2010, Sched. 1, Applied:01 Jul 2010]nurse means a registered nurse or an enrolled nurse;
operating, a vessel, means either or both of the following:
(a) being aboard and in charge of the vessel;
(b) being aboard the vessel and exerting any degree of control over its means of steering or propulsion;
owner, of a vessel – see section 5 ;
permitted concentration means a concentration of 0.05 of a gram of alcohol in –
(a) 210 litres of breath; or
(b) 100 millilitres of blood;
place includes a vehicle or vessel;
prescribed, in relation to any matter, means –
(a) prescribed in the regulations; or
(b) if the regulations do not provide for that matter, prescribed under the Corresponding Act;
procedure means a breath test, breath analysis or blood-sampling;
proceedings means proceedings for an offence under this Act;
provision, of a contract of insurance, means any term, condition, covenant or other provision of the contract, however described;
regulations means regulations made and in force under this Act;
relevant time – see section 4 ;
secured, in relation to a vessel, means that the vessel is –
(a) riding at anchor (other than a sea anchor); or
(b) tied up to a mooring, or to a moored raft or moored pontoon; or
(c) tied up to a jetty, wharf or breakwater; or
(d) berthed in a marina; or
(e) secured to another vessel to which paragraph (a) , (b) , (c) or (d) applies; or
(f) connected up to something such as a crane, slipway cradle or trailer winch in order to be put into or taken out of the water;
signatory, in relation to a certificate, means the person by whom the certificate purports to have been signed;
subject, in relation to a test, analysis or sampling of breath or blood, means the person whose breath or blood has been tested, analysed or sampled;
[Section 3 Amended by No. 38 of 2017, s. 57, Applied:03 Dec 2018][Section 3 Amended by No. 31 of 2013, s. 25, Applied:02 Sep 2013]
[Section 3 Amended by No. 31 of 2013, s. 25, Applied:02 Sep 2013]vessel means a vessel within the meaning of the Marine and Safety Authority Act 1997 .
4 Meaning of "relevant time"
4 Meaning of "relevant time"
For the purposes of this Act, a reference to "the relevant time" is a reference to –
(a) in relation to a person's liability to submit to a breath analysis under section 18 , the time when the person is first required to submit to a breath test under that section; and
(b) in relation to a person's liability to submit to a breath analysis under section 19 , the time when the person is first required to submit to the breath analysis; and
(c) in relation to a person's liability to submit to a breath analysis or blood-sampling under section 20 , the time when the person is first required to submit to the breath analysis or blood-sampling; and
(d) in relation to a person's liability to submit to a breath analysis or blood-sampling under section 23 , the time when the person is first required to submit to the breath analysis.
5 Determining who is owner of vessel
5 Determining who is owner of vessel
(1) A reference in this Act to the owner of a vessel includes a reference to a person who –
(a) is registered (with or by MAST or a corresponding maritime authority) as the owner of the vessel; or
(b) is a joint owner of the vessel; or
(c) is the charterer, lessee or hirer of the vessel; or
(d) has a right or obligation to exercise or perform any powers or functions of an owner of the vessel; or
(e) publicly represents that he or she has the right or obligation to exercise or perform those powers or functions; or
(f) is a director or other person concerned in the management of a body corporate that owns the vessel.
(2) A person does not cease to be the owner of a vessel for the purposes of this Act if the vessel is –
(a) secured under a mortgage, bill of sale, or other form of security; or
(b) chartered, leased or hired by another person.
6 Determining who is in charge of vessel
6 Determining who is in charge of vessel
(1) For the purposes of this Act, a person is taken to be in charge of a vessel at a particular time if, at that time –
(a) he or she is the only person, or the only adult, aboard the vessel; or
(b) he or she purports by word or deed, and without contradiction by any other person aboard, to be in charge of the vessel; or
(c) the other persons aboard the vessel or a majority of them acknowledge, by word or deed, that the person is in charge of the vessel; or
(d) of all the persons aboard the vessel, he or she has ultimate command of the vessel's movements.
(2) Subsection (1)(d) has effect regardless of whether, at the particular time –
(a) the vessel is underway; or
(b) the person is actually commanding the vessel's movements.
(3) If it is established in any proceedings that, at a particular time, a person was the owner of a vessel and was –
(a) aboard the vessel; and
(b) qualified by a mariners certificate to be in charge of or otherwise operate the vessel –
it is to be presumed, unless the person on the balance of probabilities establishes otherwise, that he or she had ultimate command of the vessel's movements at that time.
7 Status of pilots and masters, &c., of piloted vessels
7 Status of pilots and masters, &c., of piloted vessels
For the avoidance of doubt –
(a) a person who is purporting to exercise the powers or perform the functions of a pilot on a vessel at a particular time is, for the purposes of this Act, taken to be operating the vessel at that time; and
(b) a person is not, for the purposes of this Act, taken to have ceased being in charge of a vessel by reason only that the vessel is temporarily under the direction of a pilot.
8 Approved analysts and approved operators
8 Approved analysts and approved operators
(1) [Section 8 Subsection (1) omitted by No. 38 of 2017, s. 58, Applied:03 Dec 2018] . . . . . . . .
(2) [Section 8 Subsection (2) amended by No. 38 of 2017, s. 58, Applied:03 Dec 2018] For the purposes of this Act, an approved analyst has such functions as may be prescribed in relation to the following matters:
(a) the maintenance, testing and use of breath analysing instruments;
(b) the training and instruction of approved operators;
(c) the making and keeping of records relating to the maintenance, testing and use of breath analysing instruments.
(3) A person who is an approved analyst for the purposes of the Corresponding Act is also an approved analyst for the purposes of this Act.
(4) [Section 8 Subsection (4) amended by No. 38 of 2017, s. 58, Applied:03 Dec 2018] A person who is an approved operator for the purposes of the Corresponding Act is also an approved operator for the purposes of this Act.
Division 3 Application of Act
Division 3 Application of Act
9 Which vessels does Act apply to?
9 Which vessels does Act apply to?
(1) This Act applies to every vessel other than –
(a) a vessel under the control of the Australian Defence Force; or
(b) a warship, naval auxiliary or other vessel operating exclusively in the non-commercial government service of a foreign country.
(2) Subsection (1) has effect regardless of whether the waters that a vessel is in are navigable.
(3) In this section –
non-commercial includes scientific research.
10 When does Act apply to vessels?
10 When does Act apply to vessels?
(1) Unless the contrary intention appears, this Act only applies to vessels that are –
(a) underway; or
(b) involved in maritime accidents.
(2) A vessel is taken to be underway for the purposes of this Act if it is not secured.
(3) To avoid doubt, a vessel is taken to be underway for the purposes of this Act even if it is –
(a) drifting, with or without a sea anchor; or
(b) moving otherwise than under its own power; or
(c) temporarily stranded, and not secured.
(4) However, the fact that a vessel is not underway does not prevent police officers from exercising powers under this Act in respect of the vessel, or in respect of persons on or from the vessel, for the purposes of enforcing this Act, particularly as regards –
(a) acts or omissions that occurred, or may have occurred, while the vessel was underway; or
(b) acts or omissions that would or would be likely to occur if the vessel were to get underway.
11 Extra-territorial operation
11 Extra-territorial operation
(1) If –
(a) a person does, wholly or partly outside Tasmania, an act or thing that constitutes an offence under section 13(1) , section 14(1) , section 14(2) , section 16(1) , section 17(1) or section 17(2) ; and
(b) there is a real and substantial link between doing the act or thing and Tasmania –
that section, and the other provisions of this Act, applies to that act or thing as if it had been done wholly in Tasmania.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1) , there is a real and substantial link with Tasmania if –
(a) a significant part of the conduct relating to, or constituting, the doing of the act or thing occurred in Tasmania; or
(b) where the act or thing was done wholly or partly outside Tasmania, substantial harmful effects arose in Tasmania.
12 Act binds Crown
12 Act binds Crown
This Act binds the Crown in right of Tasmania and, so far as the legislative power of Parliament permits, in all its other capacities.
Part 2 Restrictions on Use of Alcohol by Mariners
Part 2 Restrictions on Use of Alcohol by Mariners
Division 1 Commercial vessels
Division 1 Commercial vessels
This is an opening excerpt, not the complete document.