© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
Commonwealth legislation
This Act has been repealed and is no longer in force. It is retained for historical reference.
This Manual of Standards (Part 60) sets technical rules, test procedures and documentation requirements for qualifying synthetic training devices (flight simulators and training devices). It tells operators, manufacturers and training organisations what validation, subjective and recurrent tests are needed and gives CASA the authority to approve qualifications and permitted training uses. Operators bear most compliance costs (data, testing, updates); CASA decides approvals and accepts alternative data sources subject to its discretion (see Sections 2.1, 3.1–3.4).
Want the full deep dive?
Zoe can write the in-depth analysis on top of the summary above: how it works, who it affects and what each part actually does.
Direct links to the current provisions in Manual of Standards Part 60 - Synthetic Training Devices.
Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation (legislation.gov.au), CC BY 4.0.
?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
| Manual of Standards Part 60—Synthetic Training Devices |
| VERSION 1.2: february 2016<br>Made under Part 60 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998.<br>This compilation was prepared on 9 February 2016 taking into account amendments up to Manual of Standards (MOS) – Part 60 Amendment Instrument 2016 (No. 1).<br>Prepared by Legislative Drafting Section, Legal Branch, Legal Services Division, Civil Aviation Safety Authority, Canberra.<br> |
| © Civil Aviation Safety Authority<br> <br>This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved.<br> <br>Requests for authorisation should be directed to:<br> <br> Corporate Communications<br> Civil Aviation Safety Authority<br> GPO Box 2005<br> Canberra ACT 2601<br> <br>Email: PublicEnquiries@casa.gov.au |
|---|
Table of Contents
Chapter 1: Introduction....................................................1-1
Section 1.1: General.....................................................1-1
1.1.1 Background......................................................1-1
1.1.2 Document Set....................................................1-2
1.1.3 Differences between ICAO Standards and those in MOS...............1-2
1.1.4 Differences Published in AIP........................................1-2
1.1.5 MOS Documentation Change Management...........................1-2
1.1.6 Related documents................................................1-3
Section 1.2: Glossary....................................................1-4
Section 1.3: Abbreviations and Units....................................1-10
1.3.1 Abbreviations and Units...........................................1-10
Chapter 2: Requirements...................................................2-1
Section 2.1: General Requirements.......................................2-1
2.1.1 Synthetic Training Device Qualification...............................2-1
2.1.2 Testing for STD Qualification.......................................2-1
2.1.3 Qualification Test Guide............................................2-2
2.1.4 Master Qualification Test Guide.....................................2-4
Chapter 3: Aeroplane Flight Simulator Standards............................3-1
Section 3.1: Criteria.....................................................3-1
3.1.1 Introduction......................................................3-1
Section 3.2: Validation Tests............................................3-15
3.2.1 Introduction.....................................................3-15
3.2.2 Test Requirements...............................................3-16
Section 3.3: Information for Validation Tests.............................3-59
3.3.1 Control Dynamics................................................3-59
3.3.2 Ground Effect...................................................3-63
3.3.3 Engineering Simulator–Validation Data..............................3-64
3.3.4 Motion System...................................................3-65
3.3.5 Visual System...................................................3-69
3.3.6 Sound System...................................................3-70
3.3.7 Additional Guidance Material for Validation Tests.....................3-73
Section 3.4: Functions and Subjective Tests.............................3-75
3.4.1 Introduction.....................................................3-75
3.4.2 Test Requirements...............................................3-75
Chapter 4: Helicopter Fight Simulators......................................4-1
Section 4.1: Standards..................................................4-1
4.1.1 Introduction......................................................4-1
Chapter 5: flight training devices...........................................5-1
Section 5.1: Standards..................................................5-1
5.1.1 Aeroplane Flight Training Devices...................................5-1
5.1.2 Helicopter Flight Training Devices...................................5-1
Revision History.........................................................RH-1
Australia FSD-1, Operational Standards and Requirements, Approved Flight Simulators
Canada TP9685, Aeroplane and Rotorcraft Simulator Manual
France Projet d’arrêté relatif à l’agrément des simulateurs de vol 1988
United Kingdom CAP 453, Aeroplane Flight Simulators: Approval Requirements
United States Advisory Circular 120-40B Airplane Simulator Qualification
| Definition | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Aircraft performance data | Performance data published by the aircraft manufacturer in documents such as the Aeroplane Flight Manual, Operations Manual, Performance Engineering Manual, or equivalent. |
| Audited engineering simulation | An aircraft manufacturer’s engineering simulation which has undergone a review by the appropriate regulatory authorities and been found to be an acceptable source of supplemental validation data. |
| Automatic testing | Synthetic training device testing wherein all stimuli are under computer control. |
| Breakout | The force required at the pilot’s primary controls to achieve initial movement of the control position. |
| Closed loop testing | A test method for which the input stimuli are generated by controllers which drive the synthetic training device to follow a defined target response. |
| Computer controlled aeroplane | An aeroplane where pilot inputs to the control surfaces are transferred and augmented via computers. |
| Control sweep | Movement of the appropriate pilot controller from neutral to an extreme limit in one direction (forward, aft, right or left), a continuous movement back through neutral to the opposite extreme position and then a return to the neutral position. |
| Convertible flight simulator | A flight simulator in which hardware and software can be changed so that the flight simulator becomes a replica of a different model, usually of the same type aircraft. The same flight simulator platform, flight deck shell, motion system, visual system, computers and necessary peripheral equipment can thus be used in more than one simulation. |
| Critical engine parameter | The engine parameter which is the most appropriate measure of propulsive force. |
| Damping: Critical damping | That minimum damping of a second order system such that no overshoot occurs in reaching a steady state value after being displaced from a position of equilibrium and released. This corresponds to a relative damping ratio of 1.0. |
| Damping: Overdamped | That damping of a second order system such that it has more damping than is required for critical damping as described above. This corresponds to a relative damping ratio of more than 1.0. |
| Damping: Underdamped | That damping of a second order system such that a displacement from the equilibrium position and free release results in one or more overshoots or oscillations before reaching a steady state value. This corresponds to a relative damping ratio of less than 1.0. |
| Daylight visual |
This is an opening excerpt, not the complete document.