Section (b) the course could reasonably have bee - Manual of Standards Part 173—Standards Applicable to Instrument Flight Procedure Design - (b) the course could reasonably have been expected to meet the minimum requirements of an approved course applicable at the time that it was completed; and

(b) the course could reasonably have bee(b) the course could reasonably have been expected to meet the minimum requirements of an approved course applicable at the time that it was completed; and

Start here

Get a plain-English read of (b) the course could reasonably have bee

Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Manual of Standards Part 173—Standards Applicable to Instrument Flight Procedure Design.

Section 3.3: Approved Instrument Flight Procedure Design Courses

3.3.1 Approval of Courses

3.3.1.1 In determining whether a course will be considered as an approved course, the following will be taken into consideration:

(a) an appropriate syllabus;

(b) adequate duration;

(c) appropriately qualified and experienced course lecturer(s);

(d) the provider/institution.

3.3.1.2 Approval of a course may require on-site inspection and observation of the conduct of the course.

3.3.1.3 Where assessment required in paragraph 3.3.1.1 is not possible due to the lapse in time since the course was provided, CASA may consider a course to be approved if:

(a) sufficient evidence exists that the course was completed satisfactorily; and

(b) the course could reasonably have been expected to meet the minimum requirements of an approved course applicable at the time that it was completed; and

(c) the applicant can provide evidence of additional training or practical experience which enable the applicant to satisfy the syllabus requirements of an approved course.