23Review of decisions

#### 23 Review of decisions 23 Review of decisions > > (1) An applicant who is aggrieved by the relevant licensing authority’s decision to refuse the application, or to grant the application subject to discretionary conditions, may apply for a review of the decision— > > > > > (a) to the extent to which the relevant licensing legislation provides the applicant with a right of appeal or review, in accordance with the right so provided, or > > > > > (b) to the extent to which the relevant licensing legislation does not provide the applicant with such a right, to the Civil and Administrative Tribunal (with the review being an administrative review under the [Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997](/view/html/inforce/current/act-1997-076)). > > > (2) An objector who is aggrieved by the relevant licensing authority’s decision to grant an advertised application, either generally or because the authority has failed to impose particular discretionary conditions, may apply for a review of the decision— > > > > > (a) to the extent to which the relevant licensing legislation provides the objector with a right of appeal or review, in accordance with the right so provided, or > > > > > (b) to the extent to which the relevant licensing legislation does not provide the objector with such a right, to the Civil and Administrative Tribunal (with the review being an administrative review under the [Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997](/view/html/inforce/current/act-1997-076)). > > > (3) The parties to proceedings before the Civil and Administrative Tribunal on an administrative review arising under subsection (1)(b) or (2)(b) include, in the case of an advertised application in respect of which any objection has been duly made under section 15, any objector who, in accordance with the procedural rules (within the meaning of the [Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013](/view/html/inforce/current/act-2013-002)), gives notice to the Tribunal of the objector’s wish to become a party to the application for the review. > > **s 23:** Am 2013 No 95, Sch 2.89 \[2\] \[3\].