Law Enforcement Conduct Commission Act 2016
74Abrogation of privilege as regards answers, documents and other things
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 74
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Law Enforcement Conduct Commission Act 2016.
74 Abrogation of privilege as regards answers, documents and other things
74 Abrogation of privilege as regards answers, documents and other things
(1) A witness summoned to attend or appearing at an examination is not entitled to refuse—
(a) to be sworn or to make an affirmation, or
(b) to answer any question relevant to an investigation put to the witness by the examining Commissioner, or
(c) to produce any document or other thing in the witness’s custody or control that the witness is required by the summons or by the examining Commissioner to produce.
(2) The witness is not excused from answering any question or producing any document or other thing at an examination on the ground that the answer or production may incriminate or tend to incriminate the witness, or on any other ground of privilege, or on the ground of a duty of secrecy or other restriction on disclosure, or on any other ground.
(3) If the answer made or document or other thing produced might in fact tend to incriminate the witness and the witness objects to answering the question or the production at the time of answering or producing the document or other thing, neither the answer nor the document or thing itself (if produced) may be used in any proceedings against the witness except—
(a) disciplinary proceedings, or
(b) proceedings for an offence against this Act, or
(c) proceedings for contempt under this Act, or
(d) as provided by subsections (4), (5) and (6).
This subsection extends to any further information, document or other thing obtained as a direct or indirect consequence of the answer made or document or other thing produced.
(4) They may however be used for the purposes of the investigation concerned, despite any such objection.
(5) An answer, document or thing may be used—
(a) in deciding whether to make an order under section 173 or 181D of the Police Act 1990 (and is admissible in any proceedings under Division 1A or 1C of Part 9 of that Act), and
(b) in deciding whether to make an order under section 183A of the (and is admissible in any proceedings under Division 2A of Part 9 of that Act with respect to such an order), and