The $1 million cap excludes larger invoices: Section 5(1)(ba) caps the invoice at $1 million exclusive of GST. If a contract involves multiple invoices, each under $1 million, the Act may still apply. But a single invoice over $1 million (e.g., for a large capital purchase) gets no statutory interest. Suppliers on large projects should consider contractual interest provisions.
Contracts with longer terms or interest provisions are excluded entirely: The definition of “designated contract” excludes written contracts that make specific provision for payment terms greater than the prescribed number of days OR that make specific provision for interest. A supplier that negotiates a 45-day payment term (if the prescribed number is 30) loses all statutory protection. Similarly, if the contract says “interest at 5% per annum on late payments”, the supplier cannot claim under the Act even if the contractual interest rate is lower than the statutory rate. This is a binary opt-out. Suppliers should compare the statutory rate with any contractual rate before agreeing to interest clauses.
Disputes within the designated payment period stop the clock: Section 5(1)(f) requires that the public authority did not dispute a relevant matter within the designated payment period. If the authority disputes within that period, no default event occurs. The authority can do this even for trivial or meritless reasons, and the supplier must then go to the Small Business Commission to get interest. This creates a potential for abuse: the authority can delay interest indefinitely by disputing. Section 5(2) requires the authority to comply with any procedure in a Treasurer’s instruction when initiating a dispute, but there is no penalty for non-compliance.
The “prescribed matter” confusion in section 7(1): Section 7(1) says: “If a dispute arises between a public authority and a supplier about whether interest or an amount of interest is payable under this Act on account of a prescribed matter”. The term “prescribed matter” is not defined in section 3. It may be a drafting error; elsewhere the Act uses “relevant matter” (section 5(3)). The disparity could cause confusion about what disputes can be referred to the Commission. A supplier may find the Commission refuses jurisdiction because the matter is not “prescribed”. This is a significant drafting flaw that should be clarified by amendment or regulation.
The 2 business day payment window for interest is short but unenforceable: Section 6(6) requires interest to be paid within 2 business days of the authority paying the underlying debt. If the authority pays principal but delays interest, the supplier’s only recourse is to dispute. The authority may simply ignore the 2 day requirement without consequence, as no penalty applies.
Not-for-profit entity definition may be ambiguous: The alternative limb of “not-for-profit entity” in section 3(1) - “any other entity (other than a government entity) that is not carried on for the purposes of profit or gain or for the benefit of particular people” - may catch community organisations not registered with the ACNC. But determining whether an entity is “carried on for the purposes of profit or gain” may require legal interpretation, and the burden is on the supplier to prove it qualifies.
Foreign suppliers not covered: Qualifying person requires principal place of residence in Australia. Qualifying body requires incorporation under the Corporations Act (or being a not-for-profit). A foreign company without Australian incorporation is excluded, even if it has an Australian branch. This may disadvantage overseas suppliers contracting with the South Australian government.
Construction contracts excluded: Suppliers on government building projects must rely on the Security of Payment Act, which has its own strict timelines and adjudication. The exclusion means they cannot claim interest under this Act for late payment, which may be a less favourable regime.
Treasurer’s instructions as moving target: Many provisions condition compliance on Treasurer’s instructions. These can be changed without parliamentary approval. Suppliers and authorities must keep up to date with current instructions, especially regarding invoice format and dispute procedures.