33Interpretation of inconsistency in LPS

33 Interpretation of inconsistency in LPS

[Section 33 Subsection (2) amended by No. 24 of 2014, s. 27, Applied:01 Jan 2015] [Section 33 Subsection (2A) inserted by No. 104 of 1995, s. 9 ][Section 33 Subsection (2B) inserted by No. 84 of 1997, Applied:01 Jan 1998] [Section 33 Subsection (2B) amended by No. 24 of 2014, s. 27, Applied:01 Jan 2015] [Section 33 Subsection (3) amended by No. 24 of 2014, s. 27, Applied:01 Jan 2015] [Section 33 Subsection (3AA) inserted by No. 24 of 2014, s. 27, Applied:01 Jan 2015] [Section 33 Subsection (3A) inserted by No. 84 of 1997, Applied:01 Jan 1998] [Section 33 Subsection (3B) inserted by No. 84 of 1997, Applied:01 Jan 1998] [Section 33 Subsection (3C) inserted by No. 84 of 1997, Applied:01 Jan 1998] [Section 33 Subsection (3D) inserted by No. 84 of 1997, Applied:01 Jan 1998] [Section 33 Subsection (3E) inserted by No. 84 of 1997, Applied:01 Jan 1998] [Section 33 Subsection (5) inserted by No. 24 of 2014, s. 27, Applied:01 Jan 2015] [Section 33 Subsection (6) inserted by No. 24 of 2014, s. 27, Applied:01 Jan 2015] [Section 33 Subsection (7) inserted by No. 24 of 2014, s. 27, Applied:01 Jan 2015] [Section 33 Repealed by No. 47 of 2015, s. 10, Applied:17 Dec 2015]

(1)  In the event of an inconsistency between provisions of an LPS, the LPS must, so far as practicable, be read so as to resolve the inconsistency.

(2)  In the event of an inconsistency between a provision, of a planning scheme that applies to a municipal area, that is a provision of the LPS in relation to the municipal area, and a provision of the planning scheme that is a provision of the SPPs that is in effect in relation to the municipal area –