The law creates a specialist Land and Environment Court as the primary forum for planning, environmental, land valuation and related disputes, staffing it with Judges and technically qualified Commissioners and centralising jurisdiction that would otherwise sit elsewhere.
It also embeds specialist procedures (mandatory conciliation, on‑site hearings, more informal evidence), gives many decisions finality with limited appeals, and shifts procedural burdens onto parties while concentrating operational control in court officers and the executive—changing how affected individuals, councils, developers and regulators litigate.
The Land and Environment Court Act 1979 constitutes the Land and Environment Court as a superior court of record (s 5(1)) with a seal that must be used on formal documents (s 5(2)). Its core function is to exercise the jurisdiction vested in it by this Act or any other Act (s 16(1)), including ancillary matters (s 16(1A)). That jurisdiction is exhaustively divided into eight classes.
Class 1 covers environmental planning and protection appeals, including appeals under Part 9.2 of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997, appeals under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (ss 4.55, 8.7, 8.9, 8.16, 8.18, 8.21–8.23, 8.25 and Sch 5 cl 35), Heritage Act 1977 appeals, Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 appeals and numerous other statutes (s 17). Class 2 deals with local government and miscellaneous appeals and applications, including Local Government Act 1993 appeals, Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 applications, and strata and community land matters (s 18). Class 3 encompasses land tenure, valuation, rating and compensation, including Valuation of Land Act 1916 appeals, compensation claims on compulsory acquisition, Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983 references and claims, and Access to Neighbouring Land Act 2000 proceedings (s 19).
Class 4 confers civil enforcement jurisdiction equivalent to the Supreme Court’s supervisory jurisdiction in respect of planning or environmental laws, development contracts and strata renewal plans (s 20(2)). It lists specific proceedings under the Heritage Act 1977, Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (ss 3.27, 9.45), Contaminated Land Management Act 1997, Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 and many others (s 20(1)). Class 5 provides summary criminal jurisdiction for environmental offences under the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997, Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, Pesticides Act 1999 and listed statutes (s 21). Classes 6 and 7 handle appeals from Local Court convictions or sentences for environmental offences under the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (ss 21A, 21B). Class 8 covers civil mining matters under the Mining Act 1992 and Petroleum (Onshore) Act 1991, excluding offences (s 21C).
Current sections
Direct links to the current provisions in Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
(1) This section and section 1 shall commence on the date of assent to this Act.
(2) Except as provided by this section, this Act shall commence on—
(a) such day as may be appointed by the Governor in respect thereof and as may be notified by proclamation published in the Gazette (being a day that is not later than the day referred to in paragraph (b)), or
Section 44 of the Judicial Officers Act 1986, as amended, has increased the maximum retirement age for Judges to 75 years. Clause 9 of Schedule 6 to the Judicial Officers Act 1986 provides that the new retirement age does not apply to Judges holding office who were appointed before the amendments commenced unless they consent to the change applying to them as required by section 55(2) of the Constitution Act 1902. The retirement age of 72 years continues to apply to Judges who do not consent to the increased retirement age applying to them.
on-site hearing matter—see section 34A(3).
practice note means a practice note issued under section 76.
Registrar means the Registrar of the Court.
regulations means regulations for the time being in force under this Act.
rules means rules of the Court.
(2) A reference in this Act to the exercise of a function includes, where that function is a duty, the performance of that duty.
s 4: Am 1998 No 172, Sch 6 [2] [3]; 2002 No 76, Sch 1 [1]; 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [1]–[4]; 2018 No 87, Sch 2.5 [1].
Part 2
Constitution of the Court
Part 2 Constitution of the Court
Part 2 Constitution of the Court
Division 1
Constitution
Division 1 Constitution
Division 1 Constitution
5
Constitution of the Court
5 Constitution of the Court
5 Constitution of the Court
(1) There is hereby constituted a superior court of record to be known as the Land and Environment Court.
(2) There shall be a seal of the Court, and any document required by or under this or any other Act or law to be sealed or stamped with the seal of the Court shall be so sealed or stamped.
6
Single Judge to constitute the Court
6 Single Judge to constitute the Court
6 Single Judge to constitute the Court
(1) All proceedings in the Court, and all business arising out of any such proceedings, shall, subject to this Act, be heard and disposed of before a Judge, who shall constitute the Court.
(2) Subsection (1) does not affect the provisions of this Act and the rules concerning the hearing and disposal of proceedings and business before one or more Commissioners or other officers of the Court.
Division 2
The Judges
Division 2 The Judges
Division 2 The Judges
7
Composition of the Court
7 Composition of the Court
7 Composition of the Court
The Court shall be composed of a Chief Judge appointed by the Governor and such other Judges as the Governor may from time to time appoint.
8
Appointment and qualifications of Judges
8 Appointment and qualifications of Judges
8 Appointment and qualifications of Judges
(1) The Governor may, by commission under the public seal of the State, appoint any qualified person to be a Judge.
(2) A person is qualified for appointment as a Judge if the person is under 70 years of age and—
(a) holds or has held a judicial office of this State or of the Commonwealth, another State or a Territory, or
(b) (Repealed)
(c) is an Australian lawyer of at least 7 years’ standing.
s 8: Am 1991 No 34, Sch 3; 1993 No 87, Sch 5; 1996 No 17, Sch 5.9 [1]; 2002 No 7, Sch 2; 2006 No 120, Sch 3.14 [1].
9
Remuneration etc
9 Remuneration etc
9 Remuneration etc
(1) (Repealed)
(2) Each Judge shall have the same rank, title, status and precedence and, except as provided by subsection (2A), the same remuneration and other rights as a Judge of the Supreme Court (other than the Chief Justice and the President of the Court of Appeal).
(2A) The Chief Judge shall have the same remuneration as the President of the Court of Appeal.
(3) (Repealed)
s 9: Am 1985 No 63, Sch 1 (2); 1986 No 100, Sch 4; 1991 No 34, Sch 3; 1996 No 17, Sch 5.9 [2]; 2016 No 48, Sch 2.25.
10
Acting Chief Judge
10 Acting Chief Judge
10 Acting Chief Judge
(1) The Governor may, by commission under the public seal of the State, appoint a Judge (but not an acting Judge) to be Acting Chief Judge during such period as the Chief Judge may be absent from duty.
(1A) While the Chief Judge is absent from Australia and an Acting Chief Judge has not been appointed under subsection (1), the senior Judge present in Australia is taken to be the Acting Chief Judge.
(1B) For the purposes only of subsection (1A)—
(a) the Judges shall have seniority between themselves according to the dates of their commissions as Judges under this Act, a Judge whose commission is dated earlier than that of another Judge being senior to that other Judge, and
(b) if the commissions of two or more Judges bear the same date, those Judges shall have seniority between themselves according to the seniority assigned to them by their commission or, failing any such assignment, according to the order of their being sworn.
(2) While holding office, the Acting Chief Judge shall have and may exercise the functions of the Chief Judge.
s 10: Am 1994 No 32, Sch 3; 2008 No 53, Sch 13 [1].
11
Acting Judges
11 Acting Judges
11 Acting Judges
(1) The Governor may, by commission under the public seal of the State, appoint any qualified person to act as a Judge for a time not exceeding 5 years to be specified in the commission.
(2) In subsection (1), qualified person means a person qualified for appointment as a Judge.
(3) The person so appointed shall, for the time and subject to the conditions or limitations specified in the person’s commission, have and may exercise the functions of a Judge and shall, for the purposes of this or any other Act, be deemed to be a Judge.
(3A) The person so appointed may, despite the expiration of the period of the person’s appointment, complete or otherwise continue to deal with any matters relating to proceedings that have been heard, or partly heard, by the person before the expiration of that period.
(3B) While a person completes or otherwise continues under subsection (3A) to deal with any matters relating to proceedings that have been heard or partly heard by the person before the expiration of the period of the person’s appointment, the person has all the entitlements and functions of a Judge and, for the purpose of those proceedings, is taken to continue to be a Judge.
(4) A retired Judge of the Court or of another court in New South Wales (including a retired judicial member of the Industrial Commission or the Industrial Relations Commission) may be so appointed even though the retired Judge has reached the mandatory judicial retirement age (or will have reached that age before the appointment expires), but may not be so appointed for any period that extends beyond the day on which he or she reaches the age of 78 years.
(5) The conditions or limitations specified in a commission under this section may exclude the whole or any part of the period of appointment from being regarded as prior judicial service (within the meaning of section 8 of the Judges’ Pensions Act 1953) by the person.
s 11: Am 1988 No 10, Sch 3; 1989 No 169, Sch 5; 1990 No 56, Sch 1; 1991 No 94, Sch 1; 1994 No 32, Sch 3; 1996 No 121, Sch 4.32; 1998 No 49, Sch 18 [1]; 2013 No 1, Sch 1.15 [1]; 2015 No 2, Sch 3.6 [1] [2]; 2018 No 87, Sch 2.5 [2].
11A
Supreme Court Judges may act as Land and Environment Court Judges
11A Supreme Court Judges may act as Land and Environment Court Judges
11A Supreme Court Judges may act as Land and Environment Court Judges
(1) This section applies to each of the Judges of the Supreme Court (an eligible judicial officer) other than the following—
(a) the Chief Justice,
(b) the President of the Court of Appeal,
(c) the other Judges of Appeal,
(d) the Chief Judge at Common Law,
(e) the Chief Judge in Equity,
(f) an acting Judge.
(2) An eligible judicial officer may act as a Judge for a particular period or in relation to particular proceedings in the Court if—
(a) the Chief Judge certifies that it is expedient that the eligible judicial officer should act as a Judge of the Court for the period or in relation to the proceedings, and
(b) the eligible judicial officer consents to acting as a Judge for the period or in relation to the proceedings, and
(c) the Chief Justice consents to the eligible judicial officer acting as a Judge for the period or in relation to the proceedings.
(3) The following provisions apply to and in respect of an eligible judicial officer who acts as a Judge of the Court pursuant to the provisions of this section—
(a) the eligible judicial officer has, while acting as a Judge, all the powers, authorities, privileges and immunities of a Judge of the Land and Environment Court,
(b) the eligible judicial officer may attend the sittings of the Court for the purpose of giving judgment in, or otherwise completing, any proceedings which have been heard by the Court while the eligible judicial officer was acting as a Judge in the proceedings even if the eligible judicial officer is no longer acting as a Judge,
(c) the eligible judicial officer is not, while receiving remuneration as a Judge of the Supreme Court, entitled to remuneration for acting as a Judge of the Land and Environment Court,
(d) any service of the eligible judicial officer while acting as a Judge is taken for all purposes (including for the purposes of the Supreme Court Act 1970 and the Judges’ Pensions Act 1953) to be service as a Judge of the Supreme Court,
(e) nothing in this Act or any other law requires the eligible judicial officer to devote the whole of his or her time to the duties of acting as a Judge of the Land and Environment Court.
s 11A: Ins 2010 No 63, Sch 1.11.
Division 3
Commissioners
Division 3 Commissioners
Division 3 Commissioners
pt 2, div 3, hdg: Am 1998 No 172, Sch 6 [4].
12
Commissioners
12 Commissioners
12 Commissioners
(1) The Governor may appoint any qualified person to be a Commissioner of the Court.
(2) A person is qualified to be appointed as a Commissioner if the person has, in the opinion of the Minister—
(a) special knowledge of and experience in the administration of local government or town planning,
(b) suitable qualifications and experience in town or country planning or environmental planning,
(c) special knowledge of and experience in environmental science or matters relating to the protection of the environment and environmental assessment,
(d) special knowledge of and experience in the law and practice of land valuation,
(e) suitable qualifications and experience in architecture, engineering, surveying or building construction,
(f) special knowledge of and experience in the management of natural resources or the administration and management of Crown lands, lands acquired under the Closer Settlement Acts and other lands of the Crown, or
(g) suitable knowledge of matters concerning land rights for Aborigines and qualifications and experience suitable for the determination of disputes involving Aborigines, or
(h) special knowledge of and experience in urban design or heritage.
(2AA) A person is also qualified to be appointed as a Commissioner if the person is an Australian lawyer.
(2AB) In appointing Commissioners, the Minister should ensure, as far as practicable, that the Court is comprised of persons who hold qualifications across the range of areas specified in subsections (2) and (2AA).
(2AC) While exercising the jurisdiction of the Court or any other function under this Act in relation to proceedings in Class 8 of the Court’s jurisdiction, a Commissioner may be called a “Commissioner for Mining”.
(2A) A person may be appointed as a full-time Commissioner or a part-time Commissioner.
(2B) A person appointed as a part-time Commissioner is guilty of misbehaviour if, during the term of his or her appointment, the person appears as an expert witness, or acts as the representative of any party, in proceedings before the Court.
(2C) A person appointed as a Commissioner may, despite the expiration of the term of the person’s appointment, complete or otherwise continue to deal with any matters relating to proceedings that have been heard or partly heard, or a conciliation conference that has been presided over or partly presided over, by the person before the expiration of that term.
(2D) While a person completes or otherwise continues under subsection (2C) to deal with any matters relating to proceedings that have been heard or partly heard by the person, or conciliation conferences that have been presided over or partly presided over, before the expiration of the term of the person’s appointment, the person has all the entitlements and functions of a Commissioner and, for the purpose of those proceedings or conferences, is taken to continue to be a Commissioner.
(3) One of the full-time Commissioners may, by the instrument of the Commissioner’s appointment or by a subsequent instrument, be appointed to be Senior Commissioner.
(4) Schedule 1 has effect in respect of the Commissioners.
s 12: Am 1983 No 42, Sch 3; 1994 No 32, Sch 3; 1998 No 172, Sch 6 [5]–[7]; 2002 No 76, Sch 1 [2]–[5]; 2008 No 107, Sch 14 [1] [2]; 2013 No 1, Sch 1.15 [2].
13
Acting Commissioners
13 Acting Commissioners
13 Acting Commissioners
(1) The Governor may appoint any qualified person to act as a Commissioner of the Court for a time not exceeding 5 years to be specified in the instrument of appointment.
(2) In subsection (1), qualified person means a person qualified for appointment as a Commissioner.
(3) The person so appointed has and may exercise, for the time and subject to the conditions or limitations specified in the instrument of appointment, the functions of a Commissioner and is, for the purposes of this or any other Act, deemed to be—
(a) in the case of a person acting on a full-time basis—a full-time Commissioner, and
(b) in the case of a person acting on a part-time basis—a part-time Commissioner.
(4) An acting Commissioner is entitled to be paid—
(b) such travelling and subsistence allowances as the Minister may from time to time determine in respect of the acting Commissioner.
(5) The provisions of the Government Sector Employment Act 2013 do not apply to or in respect of the appointment of an acting Commissioner, and an acting Commissioner is not, in the acting Commissioner’s capacity as such, subject to those provisions during the acting Commissioner’s term of office.
(6) A person so appointed may, despite the expiration of the term of the person’s appointment, complete or otherwise continue to deal with any matter relating to proceedings that have been heard or partly heard, or a conciliation conference that has been presided over or partly presided over, by the person before the expiration of that term.
(7) While a person completes or otherwise continues under subsection (6) to deal with any matters relating to proceedings or a conciliation conference, the person has all the entitlements and functions of a Commissioner (in the case of a person who acted on a full-time basis) or a part-time Commissioner (in the case of a person who acted on a part-time basis) and, for the purpose of those proceedings or that conference, is taken to continue to be a full-time Commissioner or part-time Commissioner (as the case may be).
s 13: Am 1994 No 32, Sch 3; 1998 No 172, Sch 6 [7] [8]; 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [5] [6]; 2012 No 60, Sch 10 [1]; 2013 No 1, Sch 1.15 [3]; 2015 No 2, Sch 3.6 [3]; 2015 No 15, Sch 3.37 [1]; 2016 No 54, Sch 1.11 [1].
14
Disqualification of Commissioners
14 Disqualification of Commissioners
14 Disqualification of Commissioners
(1) Where a Commissioner—
(a) has a pecuniary interest, direct or indirect, in a matter which is the subject of proceedings before the Court, or
(b) is a member, officer, employee or servant of a public or local authority that is a party to any proceedings before the Court,
being proceedings in respect of which the Commissioner is exercising any functions conferred or imposed on the Commissioner by or under this Act or the rules, then—
(c) the Commissioner shall inform the Chief Judge that the Commissioner has such an interest or is such a member, officer, employee or servant, and
(d) the Commissioner shall thereupon cease to exercise those functions in relation to the proceedings.
(2) A decision of the Court is not vitiated by reason that a Commissioner has failed to comply with subsection (1).
s 14: Am 1994 No 32, Sch 3; 1998 No 172, Sch 6 [7] [9].
Division 4
Other officers of the Court
Division 4 Other officers of the Court
Division 4 Other officers of the Court
15
Appointment of other officers
15 Appointment of other officers
15 Appointment of other officers
(1) A Registrar, an Assistant Registrar and such other officers of the Court as may be necessary for the proper administration of this Act and the rules may be employed under the Government Sector Employment Act 2013.
(2) The Registrar, Assistant Registrar and other officers of the Court shall have such functions as may be prescribed by this Act, the rules or the regulations.
(3) The Assistant Registrar shall have and may exercise the functions of the Registrar, and all acts, matters and things done or omitted by the Assistant Registrar shall be as valid and effectual and shall have the same consequences as if the acts, matters and things had been done or omitted by the Registrar.
s 15: Am 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [7] [8]; 2015 No 15, Sch 3.37 [1].
Part 3
Jurisdiction of the Court
Part 3 Jurisdiction of the Court
Part 3 Jurisdiction of the Court
16
Jurisdiction of the Court generally
16 Jurisdiction of the Court generally
16 Jurisdiction of the Court generally
(1) The Court shall have the jurisdiction vested in it by or under this or any other Act.
(1A) The Court also has jurisdiction to hear and dispose of any matter not falling within its jurisdiction under any other provision of this Act or under any other Act, being a matter that is ancillary to a matter that falls within its jurisdiction under any other provision of this Act or under any other Act.
(2) For the purposes of this Act, the jurisdiction of the Court is divided into 8 classes, as provided in this Division.
s 16: Am 1990 No 84, Sch 2; 1993 No 32, Sch 2; 1999 No 39, Sch 5 [1]; 2008 No 107, Sch 14 [3].
17
Class 1—environmental planning and protection appeals
17 Class 1—environmental planning and protection appeals
17 Class 1—environmental planning and protection appeals
The Court has jurisdiction (referred to in this Act as “Class 1” of its jurisdiction) to hear and dispose of the following—
(d) appeals, objections and applications under sections 4.55, 8.7, 8.8, 8.9, 8.16, 8.18, 8.21, 8.22, 8.23 and 8.25 of, and clause 35 of Schedule 5 to, the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979,
s 17: Am 1983 No 93, Sch 1 (1); 1985 No 15, Sch 1; 1985 No 115, Sch 1 (1); 1985 No 200, Sch 1 (1); 1986 No 220, Sch 1; 1989 No 204, Sch 1; 1991 No 66, sec 6; 1991 No 90, Sch 2 (1); 1993 No 12, Sch 2; 1995 No 101, Sch 6.5 [1]; 1995 No 102, Sch 6.3 [1]; 1997 No 133, Sch 5.2 [1]; 1997 No 140, Sch 1.3 [1]; 1997 No 152, Sch 4.18 [1] [2]; 1997 No 156, Sch 4.10 [1]; 1998 No 120, Sch 2.18; 1998 No 138, Sch 2.4 [1]; 1999 No 31, Sch 2.20 [1]; 1999 No 80, Sch 3.4 [1]; 1999 No 87, Sch 2 [1]; 1999 No 94, Sch 4.1; 1999 No 97, Sch 2.5 [1]; 2000 No 92, Sch 8.14 [1]; 2001 No 58, Sch 3.4 [1]; 2002 No 76, Sch 1 [6]; 2003 No 103, Sch 2.2 [1]; 2005 No 43, Sch 7.8; 2006 No 125, Sch 2.3 [1]; 2007 No 29, Sch 3; 2007 No 83, Sch 2.1 [1]; 2008 No 95, Sch 2.4 [1]; 2010 No 38, Sch 3.4; 2010 No 39, Sch 2.3; 2010 No 59, Sch 2.47 [1] [2]; 2010 No 133, Sch 3.2; 2011 No 8, Sch 1.4 [1]; 2011 No 27, Sch 2.23; 2014 No 74, Sch 3.14 [1]; 2015 No 26, Sch 3.2; 2016 No 63, Sch 11.4 [1]; 2017 No 17, Sch 4.46 [1]; 2017 No 21, Sch 5.2 [1]; 2020 No 30, Sch 2.23[1]; 2021 No 26, Sch 2.7[1]; 2021 No 31, Sch 3.1[1]; 2023 No 30, Sch 2.7[1]; 2024 No 10, Sch 2.2; 2024 No 20, Sch 3[1]; 2024 No 47, Sch 2.5.
18
Class 2—local government and miscellaneous appeals and applications
18 Class 2—local government and miscellaneous appeals and applications
18 Class 2—local government and miscellaneous appeals and applications
The Court has jurisdiction (referred to in this Act as “Class 2” of its jurisdiction) to hear and dispose of the following—
(a) appeals or objections under sections 176, 177, 178, 180, 182 and 611 of, and regulations made under section 178A of, the Local Government Act 1993,
(a1) appeals under sections 15 and 105, and applications under section 106, of the Roads Act 1993,
(i) appeals under sections 140, 182, 213, 259, 277, 328 and 360 of the Biosecurity Act 2015,
(j) despite any other provision of this Division—appeals under any Act to the Court against building product rectification orders made under the Building Products (Safety) Act 2017,
s 18: Am 1986 No 22, sec 3; 1986 No 158, Sch 1; 1986 No 220, Sch 1 (am 1988 No 58, Sch 1); 1987 No 150, sec 4; 1987 No 209, Sch 18 (1); 1987 No 285, sec 34; 1989 No 235, sec 65; 1990 No 31, sec 33; 1990 No 89, sec 4; 1992 No 49, Sch 2; 1993 No 11, Sch 3; 1993 No 12, Sch 2; 1993 No 13, Sch 2; 1993 No 32, Sch 2; 1993 No 33, Sch 1; 1994 No 44, Sch 19; 1996 No 139, Sch 2.18 [1] [2] (am 1997 No 55, Sch 2.18 [1] [2]); 1997 No 152, Sch 4.18 [3] [4]; 1998 No 138, Sch 2.4 [2]; 2000 No 92, Sch 8.14 [2]; 2003 No 104, Sch 5.2; 2004 No 39, Sch 7.3 [1]; 2006 No 126, Sch 2.3 [1] [2]; 2010 No 27, Sch 2.2; 2010 No 59, Sch 2.47 [1] [2]; 2011 No 59, Sch 2.5 [1]; 2015 No 2, Sch 4.3 [1]; 2015 No 24, Sch 8.23 [1] [2]; 2015 No 51, Sch 9.10 [1] [2]; 2017 No 17, Sch 3.1; 2019 No 6, Sch 2.2; 2019 No 10, Sch 1.14; 2020 No 7, Sch 2.3[1]; 2020 No 9, Sch 2.2[1]; 2021 No 7, Sch 4.9[1]; 2021 No 32, Sch 1.7; 2023 No 35, Sch 2.6.
19
Class 3—land tenure, valuation, rating and compensation matters
19 Class 3—land tenure, valuation, rating and compensation matters
19 Class 3—land tenure, valuation, rating and compensation matters
The Court has jurisdiction (referred to in this Act as “Class 3” of its jurisdiction) to hear and dispose of the following—
(a) appeals, references or other matters that may be heard and disposed of by the Court under the Crown Land Management Act 2016 or Division 2 of Part 12 of the Roads Act 1993, being appeals, references or other matters that are not referred to in any other section of this Part,
(d) appeals and applications under sections 179, 181, 526 (and section 526 as applied by section 531), 574, 677 and 730 of the Local Government Act 1993,
(h) any other appeals, references or other matters which an Act provides may be heard and disposed of by the Court, being appeals, references or other matters that are not referred to in any other section of this Part.
s 19: Am 1981 No 119, Sch 1; 1989 No 154, Sch 2 (1); 1989 No 171, Sch 3; 1990 No 55, Sch 1; 1992 No 34, Sch 1; 1992 No 84, Sch 3; 1992 No 111, Sch 1; 1993 No 32, Sch 2; 1993 No 33, Sch 1; 1994 No 38, Sch 8; 1995 No 16, Sch 2.14 [1] [2]; 1997 No 128, Sch 2.2; 1997 No 152, Sch 4.18 [5] (am 1998 No 120, Sch 2.15 [2]); 1999 No 39, Sch 5 [2]; 1999 No 58, Sch 2.2; 2000 No 2, Sch 1 [1]; 2000 No 92, Sch 8.14 [3]; 2000 No 106, Sch 4.3 [1] [2]; 2001 No 118, Sch 2.7 [1] [2]; 2004 No 12, sec 4; 2004 No 39, Sch 7.3 [2]; 2004 No 108, Sch 3.2; 2008 No 53, Sch 13 [2]; 2009 No 42, Sch 3.2; 2009 No 114, Sch 2.2; 2010 No 59, Sch 2.47 [1] [2]; 2011 No 38, Sch 3 [1]; 2015 No 2, Sch 4.3 [2]; 2015 No 51, Sch 9.10 [3]; 2017 No 9, Sch 4.3 [1]; 2017 No 17, Sch 4.46 [2]; 2017 No 37, Sch 2.2 [1]; 2020 No 30, Sch 2.23[2].
20
Class 4—environmental planning and protection, development contract and strata renewal plan civil enforcement
20 Class 4—environmental planning and protection, development contract and strata renewal plan civil enforcement
20 Class 4—environmental planning and protection, development contract and strata renewal plan civil enforcement
(1) The Court has jurisdiction (referred to in this Act as “Class 4” of its jurisdiction) to hear and dispose of the following—
(cn) proceedings relating to elections for members of local boards (including relating to enrolment) under regulations made under the Local Land Services Act 2013,
(2) The Court has the same civil jurisdiction as the Supreme Court would, but for section 71, have to hear and dispose of the following proceedings—
(a) to enforce any right, obligation or duty conferred or imposed by a planning or environmental law, a development contract or a strata renewal plan,
(b) to review, or command, the exercise of a function conferred or imposed by a planning or environmental law, a development contract or a strata renewal plan,
(c) to make declarations of right in relation to any such right, obligation or duty or the exercise of any such function,
(d) whether or not as provided by section 68 of the Supreme Court Act 1970—to award damages for a breach of a development contract.
(2A) The Court has jurisdiction to hear and dispose of proceedings referred to in subsection (1)(dd).
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2), a planning or environmental law is—
(b) any statutory instrument made or having effect thereunder or made for the purposes thereof, including any deemed environmental planning instrument within the meaning of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979,
(c) (Repealed)
as respectively in force at any time, whether before, on or after 1 September 1980.
(3A) The Court (constituted by a Judge) may, by order, declare that any proceedings in the Court that it considers to be related or ancillary to transferred civil proceedings are to be dealt with together with the transferred civil proceedings. In the event of such an order being made, the proceedings that are the subject of the declaration may be dealt with under this Act as if they belonged to Class 4 of the Court’s jurisdiction even if they belong to a different class of the Court’s jurisdiction.
(4) Subject to any adaptations prescribed by the rules, the provisions of the Supreme Court Act 1970, the Civil Procedure Act 2005 and the rules made under those Acts apply to the enforcement of a judgment or order of the Court in the same way as they apply to the enforcement of a judgment or order of the Supreme Court.
(a1) proceedings under section 67, 70, 71, 73, 74, 77, 80, 81, 84, 92, 93 or 94 of the Water NSW Act 2014 or offences under regulations made under that Act,
(i) any other proceedings for an offence which an Act provides may be taken before, or dealt with by, the Court.
s 21: Am 1980 No 77, Sch 1 (2); 1983 No 93, Sch 1 (3); 1986 No 134, Sch 1; 1986 No 194, sec 14 (c); 1987 No 209, Sch 18 (2); 1989 No 44, sec 23; 1989 No 150, sec 29; 1989 No 208, sec 37 (c); 1990 No 84, Sch 2; 1991 No 90, Sch 2 (3); 1992 No 34, Sch 1; 1993 No 32, Sch 2; 1993 No 46, Sch 1; 1994 No 41, Sch 3; 1995 No 102, Sch 6.3 [3]; 1997 No 113, Sch 1.4; 1997 No 140, Sch 1.3 [4]; 1997 No 153, Sch 6.3; 1997 No 156, Sch 4.10 [5]; 1999 No 80, Sch 3.4 [4]; 2000 No 92, Sch 8.14 [6]; 2003 No 55, Sch 2.1; 2006 No 125, Sch 2.3 [3]; 2006 No 126, Sch 2.3 [4]; 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [9]; 2007 No 83, Sch 2.1 [2]; 2008 No 95, Sch 2.4 [2]; 2010 No 59, Sch 2.47 [1] [2]; 2012 No 5, Sch 1.2; 2014 No 65, Sch 1.2 [3]; 2014 No 74, Sch 3.14 [2]; 2016 No 63, Sch 11.4 [7]; 2017 No 17, Sch 4.46 [4]; 2017 No 21, Sch 5.2 [4]; 2018 No 29, Sch 1.16 [2]; 2018 No 63, Sch 3.8[1]; 2020 No 7, Sch 2.3[3]; 2020 No 9, Sch 2.2[3]; 2020 No 30, Sch 2.23[5]; 2021 No 26, Sch 2.7[2]; 2021 No 31, Sch 3.1[4]; 2023 No 30, Sch 2.7[1].
21A
Class 6—appeals from convictions relating to environmental offences
21A Class 6—appeals from convictions relating to environmental offences
21A Class 6—appeals from convictions relating to environmental offences
The Court has jurisdiction (referred to in this Act as “Class 6” of its jurisdiction) to hear and dispose of appeals under section 31 or 42 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001.
s 21A: Ins 1990 No 84, Sch 2. Am 1998 No 137, Sch 2.13; 1999 No 39, Sch 5 [4]; 2001 No 121, Sch 2.132 [1]; 2008 No 107, Sch 14 [4]; 2011 No 62, Sch 2.17.
21B
Class 7—other appeals relating to environmental offences
21B Class 7—other appeals relating to environmental offences
21B Class 7—other appeals relating to environmental offences
The Court has jurisdiction (referred to in this Act as “Class 7” of its jurisdiction) to hear and dispose of appeals under section 32 or 43 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001.
s 21B: Ins 1999 No 39, Sch 5 [5]. Am 2001 No 121, Sch 2.132 [2]; 2011 No 62, Sch 2.17.
21C
Class 8—mining matters
21C Class 8—mining matters
21C Class 8—mining matters
(1) The Court has jurisdiction (referred to in this Act as “Class 8” of its jurisdiction) to hear and dispose of proceedings arising under the Mining Act 1992 or the Petroleum (Onshore) Act 1991.
(2) This section does not apply to proceedings for an offence under either of those Acts.
s 21C: Ins 2008 No 107, Sch 14 [5].
22
Determination of matter completely and finally
22 Determination of matter completely and finally
22 Determination of matter completely and finally
The Court shall, in every matter before the Court, grant either absolutely or on such terms and conditions as the Court thinks just, all remedies to which any of the parties appears to be entitled in respect of a legal or equitable claim properly brought forward by that party in the matter, so that, as far as possible, all matters in controversy between the parties may be completely and finally determined and all multiplicity of proceedings concerning any of those matters may be avoided.
s 22: Am 1994 No 32, Sch 3.
23
Making of orders
23 Making of orders
23 Making of orders
The Court has power, in relation to matters in which it has jurisdiction, to make orders of such kinds, including interlocutory orders, as the Court thinks appropriate.
24
Claim for compensation in compulsory acquisition cases
24 Claim for compensation in compulsory acquisition cases
24 Claim for compensation in compulsory acquisition cases
(b) no agreement is reached between the claimant and the authority required to pay the compensation,
the claim is (subject to any such Act) to be heard and disposed of by the Court and not otherwise.
(2) The Court shall, for the purpose of determining any such claim, give effect to any relevant provisions of any Acts that prescribe a basis for, or matters to be considered in, the assessment of compensation.
(3) (Repealed)
s 24: Am 1980 No 77, Sch 1 (3); 1991 No 22, Sch 1; 1993 No 33, Sch 1.
25
Determination of estate, interest and amount
25 Determination of estate, interest and amount
25 Determination of estate, interest and amount
(1) In hearing and disposing of any claim referred to in section 24, the Court shall have jurisdiction to determine the nature of the estate or interest of the claimant in the subject land and the amount of compensation (if any) to which the claimant is entitled.
(2) In the exercise of its jurisdiction under subsection (1), the Court may order that any other person who claims to have had or who may have had an interest in the subject land at the date of acquisition or taking be joined as a party to the proceedings and may then proceed to determine the nature of the estate or interest of that person and the amount of compensation (if any) to which the person is entitled.
(ii) in respect of a development application made on or after the commencement of this subsection.
(2) This Division extends to invalidity arising from any steps preliminary to the granting of a development consent to which this Division applies, whether those steps were taken, or should have been taken, by the Minister or any other consent authority, or by any other person or body.
(3) In particular, this Division extends to invalidity arising from non-compliance with requirements declared to be mandatory requirements under section 4.60 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
s 25A: Ins 1997 No 81, Sch 2. Am 1997 No 152, Sch 4.18 [6]–[8]; 1999 No 31, Sch 2.20 [2]; 2020 No 30, Sch 2.23[6].
25B
Orders for conditional validity of development consents
25B Orders for conditional validity of development consents
25B Orders for conditional validity of development consents
(1) The Court may, instead of declaring or determining that a development consent to which this Division applies is invalid, whether in whole or in part, make an order—
(a) suspending the operation of the consent in whole or in part, and
(b) specifying terms compliance with which will validate the consent (whether without alterations or on being regranted with alterations).
(2) Terms may include (without limitation)—
(a) terms requiring the carrying out again of steps already carried out, or
(b) terms requiring the carrying out of steps not already commenced or carried out, or
(c) terms requiring acts, matters or things to be done or omitted that are different from acts, matters or things required to be done or omitted by or under this Act or any other Act.
s 25B: Ins 1997 No 81, Sch 2.
25C
Orders for validity of development consents
25C Orders for validity of development consents
25C Orders for validity of development consents
(1) On application by the Minister or any other consent authority for an order under this subsection on the grounds that the terms specified under section 25B have been substantially complied with and that it is not proposed that the relevant development consent be regranted with alterations, the Court may make an order—
(a) declaring that the terms have been substantially complied with, and
(b) declaring that the consent is valid, and
(c) revoking the order of suspension.
(2) On application by the Minister or any other consent authority for an order under this subsection on the ground that the terms specified under section 25B have been substantially complied with and that the development consent has been regranted with alterations as referred to in section 4.61 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the Court may make an order—
(a) declaring that the terms have been complied with, and
(b) declaring that the development consent has been validly regranted, and
(c) declaring that the suspended development consent has been revoked, and
(d) revoking the order of suspension.
s 25C: Ins 1997 No 81, Sch 2. Am 1997 No 152, Sch 4.18 [9] [10]; 1999 No 31, Sch 2.20 [3]; 2020 No 30, Sch 2.23[7].
25D
Power to grant another development consent
25D Power to grant another development consent
25D Power to grant another development consent
Nothing in this Division prevents the grant of another development consent in relation to the same matter, during or after the period of suspension, pursuant to a development application duly made.
s 25D: Ins 1997 No 81, Sch 2.
25E
Duty of Court
25E Duty of Court
25E Duty of Court
It is the duty of the Court to consider making an order under this Division instead of declaring or determining that a development consent to which this Division applies is invalid, whether in whole or in part.
s 25E: Ins 1997 No 81, Sch 2.
Part 4
Exercise of jurisdiction
Part 4 Exercise of jurisdiction
Part 4 Exercise of jurisdiction
29
Sittings of the Court
29 Sittings of the Court
29 Sittings of the Court
(1) The Court shall sit at such places and times as the Chief Judge may direct.
(2) More than one sitting of the Court may be held at the same time.
30
Arrangement of business of the Court
30 Arrangement of business of the Court
30 Arrangement of business of the Court
(1) The Chief Judge is responsible for ensuring the orderly and expeditious discharge of the business of the Court and accordingly may, subject to this Act and to such consultation with the Judges as is appropriate and practicable, make arrangements as to—
(a) the Judge, Commissioner or Commissioners who is or are to exercise the Court’s jurisdiction in particular matters or classes of matters, and
(b) the Commissioner or Commissioners who is or are to exercise any other function under this Act.
(2) Subject to subsections (2A), (2B) and (2C), in determining the Commissioner or Commissioners who is or are to exercise the jurisdiction of the Court or any other function under this Act in relation to any proceedings, regard shall be had to the knowledge, experience and qualifications of the Commissioners and to the nature of the matters involved in the proceedings.
(2A) A Commissioner shall not exercise the jurisdiction of the Court or any other function under this Act in relation to any proceedings arising under the Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983, unless the Commissioner has a qualification referred to in section 12(2)(g).
(2B) A Commissioner whose only qualification under section 12(2) or (2AA) is a qualification referred to in section 12(2)(g) shall not exercise the jurisdiction of the Court or any other function under this Act in relation to any proceedings other than proceedings arising under the Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983.
(2C) A Commissioner shall not exercise the jurisdiction of the Court or any other function under this Act in relation to proceedings in Class 8 of the Court’s jurisdiction unless the Commissioner is an Australian lawyer.
(3) Where the hearing of any proceedings has been commenced or completed by 2 or more Commissioners in accordance with section 36 but, before the proceedings have been disposed of, one of those Commissioners has ceased to be a Commissioner or has ceased to be available for the purposes of the proceedings—
(a) if the parties agree and the Chief Judge concurs, the proceedings may be heard and disposed of, or disposed of, by the remaining Commissioner or Commissioners, or
(b) in any other case—the proceedings shall be reheard in accordance with this Act.
(4) Where proceedings are reheard, as referred to in subsection (3), the Court or the Commissioner or Commissioners rehearing the proceedings may, for the purposes of those proceedings, have regard to any record of the proceedings before the Commissioners referred to in that subsection, including a record of any evidence taken in the proceedings.
s 30: Am 1983 No 42, Sch 3; 1994 No 32, Sch 3; 1998 No 172, Sch 6 [7] [10]–[13]; 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [11]; 2008 No 107, Sch 14 [6] [7]; 2014 No 14, Sch 5.3 [1] [2].
31
Irregularity of proceedings
31 Irregularity of proceedings
31 Irregularity of proceedings
(1) This section applies if the Court determines, on application by a party or of its own motion, that any proceedings before it are not being dealt with in the manner appropriate to the class of jurisdiction to which they belong.
(2) In the circumstances referred to in subsection (1), the Court may make either of the following orders on such terms as may be necessary—
(a) an order that the proceedings be dismissed,
(b) an order that the proceedings be dealt with in the appropriate manner.
(3) If the Court makes an order referred to in subsection (2)(b)—
(a) the proceedings are taken to have been duly commenced, and
(b) any step that has been taken in the proceedings is deemed to have been duly taken.
(4) The Court may make such orders as it thinks fit for the future conduct of the proceedings.
s 31: Subst 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [12].
32
32
32 (Repealed)
33
Exercise of jurisdiction generally
33 Exercise of jurisdiction generally
33 Exercise of jurisdiction generally
(1) Classes 1, 2 and 3 of the Court’s jurisdiction shall, in accordance with this Act, be exercised by a Judge or one or more Commissioners.
(2) Classes 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the Court’s jurisdiction shall, in accordance with this Act, be exercised by a Judge.
(2A) Class 8 of the Court’s jurisdiction shall, in accordance with this Act, be exercised by a Judge or by a Commissioner who is an Australian lawyer.
(3) The Court’s jurisdiction under section 16(1A) is to be exercised by a Judge, but this subsection does not prevent a Judge from being assisted by one or more Commissioners in accordance with section 37.
s 33: Am 1990 No 84, Sch 2; 1993 No 32, Sch 2; 1999 No 39, Sch 5 [7]; 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [14]; 2008 No 107, Sch 14 [8].
34
Conciliation conferences
34 Conciliation conferences
34 Conciliation conferences
(1) If proceedings are pending in Class 1, 2 or 3 of the Court’s jurisdiction, the Court—
(a) may arrange a conciliation conference between the parties or their representatives, with or without their consent, and
(b) if it does so, must notify the parties or their representatives of the time and place fixed for the conference.
(1A) It is the duty of each party to proceedings where a conciliation conference has been arranged under subsection (1) to participate, in good faith, in the conciliation conference.
(2) A conciliation conference is to be presided over by a single Commissioner.
(3) If, either at or after a conciliation conference, agreement is reached between the parties or their representatives as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties (being a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions), the Commissioner—
(a) must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision, and
(b) must set out in writing the terms of the decision.
(4) If no such agreement is reached, the Commissioner must terminate the conciliation conference and—
(a) unless the parties consent under paragraph (b), must make a written report to the Court—
(i) stating that no such agreement has been reached and that the conciliation conference has been terminated, and
(ii) setting out what in the Commissioner’s view are the issues in dispute between the parties, or
(b) if the parties consent to the Commissioner disposing of the proceedings, must dispose of the proceedings—
(i) following a hearing, whether held forthwith or later, or
(ii) with the consent of the parties, on the basis of what has occurred at the conciliation conference.
(5) The Commissioner, when giving his or her decision under subsection (4)(b), is to give reasons for the decision—
(a) in writing, or
(b) orally and recorded by means that can be reproduced.
(6) If satisfied that there is a good reason to do so, the Commissioner may adjourn the conciliation conference to a time and place fixed in consultation with the Registrar.
(7) Subject to this Act and the rules, the Commissioner disposing of, or hearing and disposing of, proceedings pursuant to subsection (3) or (4)(b) has and may exercise the functions of the Court.
(8) The decision of the Commissioner under subsection (3) or (4)(b) is taken to be the decision of the Court.
(9) If a report is made to the Court under subsection (4)(a), it must, as soon as practicable, furnish a copy of the report to each of the parties.
(10) If an agreement is reached between the parties and proceedings are being dealt with under subsection (3), any document signed by the parties is admissible as to the fact that such an agreement has been reached and as to the substance of the agreement.
(10A) The same privilege with respect to defamation as exists with respect to judicial proceedings and a document produced in judicial proceedings exists with respect to—
(a) a conciliation conference, and
(b) a document or other material sent to or produced to a Commissioner, or sent to or produced at the Court or the registry of the Court, for the purpose of enabling a conciliation conference to be arranged.
(10B) The privilege conferred by subsection (10A) extends only to a publication made—
(a) at a conciliation conference, or
(b) in a document or other material sent to or produced to a Commissioner, or sent to or produced at the Court or the registry of the Court, for the purpose of enabling a conciliation conference to be arranged.
(11) Subject to subsections (10) and (12)—
(a) evidence of anything said or of any admission made in a conciliation conference is not admissible in any proceedings before any court, tribunal or body, and
(b) a document prepared for the purposes of, or in the course of, or as a result of, a conciliation conference, or any copy of such a document, is not admissible in evidence in any proceedings before any court, tribunal or body.
(12) Subsection (11) does not apply with respect to any evidence or document if the parties consent to the admission of the evidence or document.
(13) The Commissioner presiding over a conference under this section in relation to any proceedings is disqualified from further participation in those proceedings, unless the parties otherwise agree.
(14) Unless otherwise directed by the Chief Judge, the Registrar may preside over a conference under this section and, in that event, a reference in this section to a Commissioner includes a reference to the Registrar.
s 34: Am 1991 No 22, Sch 1; 1994 No 32, Sch 3; 1998 No 172, Sch 6 [7] [10]; 2002 No 76, Sch 1 [7]; 2006 No 107, Sch 1.19 [1]–[4]. Subst 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [15]. Am 2007 No 73, Sch 2; 2008 No 53, Sch 13 [3].
34AA
Mandatory conciliation and arbitration
34AA Mandatory conciliation and arbitration
34AA Mandatory conciliation and arbitration
(1) This section applies to the following proceedings pending in Class 1 of the Court’s jurisdiction relating to appeals, objections and applications under section 8.7 or 8.9 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979—
(a) proceedings concerning development applications, or modifications to development consents, for—
(i) development for the purposes of detached single dwellings and dual occupancies (including subdivisions), or alterations or additions to such dwellings or dual occupancies, or
(ii) development of a kind prescribed by the regulations,
(b) particular proceedings that the Court orders, on the application of a party to the proceedings or of its own motion, to be dealt with under this section.
(2) Section 34 applies to the proceedings with the following modifications—
(a) the Court must arrange a conciliation conference between the parties and their representatives with or without their consent,
Note.
The Commissioner has the discretion to determine the place (including an on-site hearing) fixed for the conciliation conference.
(b) if no agreement of a kind referred to in section 34(3) is reached, the Commissioner who presides over the conciliation conference must terminate the conciliation conference and, subject to this section, dispose of the proceedings—
(i) following a hearing held forthwith, or
(ii) if the parties consent, on the basis of what has occurred at the conciliation conference.
(3) The Court or the Commissioner may at any time, if the Court or Commissioner thinks it appropriate in the circumstances of the case, determine that proceedings are not to be dealt with or are not to continue to be dealt with under subsection (2). A determination may be made on the motion of the Court or Commissioner or on application by the parties.
(4) If the Court or Commissioner determines that proceedings are not to be dealt with or are not to continue to be dealt with under subsection (2), the proceedings are to be dealt with under section 34C.
s 34AA: Ins 2010 No 120, Sch 2 [1]. Am 2020 No 30, Sch 2.23[8].
34A
Proceedings to which on-site hearing procedures apply
34A Proceedings to which on-site hearing procedures apply
34A Proceedings to which on-site hearing procedures apply
(1) This section applies to the following proceedings, if the proceedings have not been disposed of under section 34—
(1A) This section does not apply to proceedings to which section 34AA applies.
(2) If, in relation to proceedings under section 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the parties agree, or, in the absence of any such agreement, the Registrar at the first or a subsequent callover determines, that the proceedings involve proposed development that—
(a) has an estimated value that is less than half the median sale price for the previous quarter for all dwellings in the local government area in which the development is proposed to be carried out, and
(b) if carried out, would have little or no impact beyond neighbouring properties, and
(c) does not involve any significant issue of public interest beyond any impact on neighbouring properties,
the proceedings are to be dealt with under section 34B, subject to subsection (6).
(2A) Proceedings to which this section applies (other than proceedings under section 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979) are to be dealt with under section 34B, subject to subsection (6), if the Registrar at the first or a subsequent callover determines that the proceedings—
(a) have little or no impact beyond neighbouring properties, and
(b) do not involve any significant issue of public interest beyond any impact on neighbouring properties.
(3) Proceedings that are dealt with under section 34B are referred to in this Act as on-site hearing matters.
(4) Proceedings to which this section applies, other than those referred to in subsection (2) or (2A), are to be dealt with under section 34C, subject to subsection (6).
(5) Proceedings that are dealt with under section 34C are referred to in this Act as court hearing matters.
(6) At any time before proceedings to which this section applies commence to be dealt with under section 34B or 34C, the Court, on the application of a party or of its own motion, may determine that the proceedings are to be dealt with—
(a) under section 34C instead of under section 34B, or
(b) under section 34B instead of under section 34C.
s 34A: Ins 2002 No 76, Sch 1 [8]. Am 2006 No 107, Sch 1.19 [5]–[9]; 2006 No 126, Sch 2.3 [5]; 2010 No 120, Sch 2 [2]; 2011 No 8, Sch 1.4 [4]–[6]; 2020 No 30, Sch 2.23[9]–[12].
34B
Arrangements for dealing with on-site hearing matters
34B Arrangements for dealing with on-site hearing matters
34B Arrangements for dealing with on-site hearing matters
(1) Proceedings that are dealt with under this section are to be dealt with by means of an on-site conference to be heard and disposed of by one or more Commissioners.
(2) The on-site conference is to be held on the site of the proposed development, unless the Commissioner is of the opinion that—
(a) it would be unfair to the interests of one or more of the parties to hold the on-site conference there, or
(b) the lack of facilities at that site make it impractical to hold the on-site conference there.
(3) The Commissioner may dispose of the proceedings with or without further hearing, at any time after the conclusion of the on-site conference.
(4) The Commissioner, when giving his or her decision, is to give reasons for the decision—
(a) in writing, or
(b) orally and recorded by means that can be reproduced.
(5) The provisions of section 36(2)–(6) apply to the hearing and disposal of proceedings under this section.
(6) In this section, Commissioner means the Commissioner or Commissioners hearing the on-site hearing matter.
s 34B: Ins 2002 No 76, Sch 1 [8]. Am 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [16]–[19]; 2008 No 53, Sch 13 [4]–[6].
34C
Arrangements for dealing with court hearing matters
34C Arrangements for dealing with court hearing matters
34C Arrangements for dealing with court hearing matters
(1) Proceedings that are dealt with under this section are to be dealt with, at the direction of the Chief Judge—
(a) by a Judge, or
(b) by a single Commissioner, or
(c) if, in the opinion of the Chief Judge, the hearing of the proceedings is likely to be lengthy, or if the proceedings involve a publicly controversial site, or a publicly controversial development, or if the proceedings involve a substantial number of issues, or if the Chief Judge is of the opinion that it is otherwise appropriate to do so, by a panel consisting of—
(i) two or more Commissioners, or
(ii) a Judge and one or more Commissioners.
(2) The appointment of a person to a panel is to be made having regard to the relevance of the person’s expertise and experience to the subject of the proceedings.
(3) If a panel consists of two or more Commissioners, the provisions of section 36(2)–(7) apply to the proceedings before the panel in the same way as those provisions apply to proceedings under section 36.
(4) If a panel consists of a Judge and one or more Commissioners—
(a) subject to this Act and the rules, the panel has and may exercise the functions of the Court, and
(b) the Judge is to preside at the hearing of the proceedings before the panel, and
(c) the Commissioner or Commissioners may advise and assist the Judge but are not to adjudicate on any matter before the panel, and
(d) the provisions of section 37(4) apply to the Judge who is a member of the panel in the same way as those provisions apply to a Judge before whom proceedings referred to in section 37(1) or (2) are pending, and
(e) the decision of the panel is taken to be the decision of the Court.
(5) The provisions of section 36(2), (3), (5), (6) and (7) apply to the hearing and disposal of proceedings under this section by a single Commissioner in the same way as those provisions apply to the hearing and disposal of proceedings under that section by a single Commissioner.
s 34C: Ins 2002 No 76, Sch 1 [8].
34D
Site inspections in court hearing matters
34D Site inspections in court hearing matters
34D Site inspections in court hearing matters
Before disposing of a court hearing matter, the Court (or the persons exercising the functions of the Court) must make an inspection of the site of the proposed development, unless—
(a) all the parties agree to dispense with an inspection, or
(b) the Court (or the persons exercising the functions of the Court) considers that the matter can be properly determined without the need for an inspection.
s 34D: Ins 2002 No 76, Sch 1 [8]. Subst 2008 No 53, Sch 13 [7].
35
Inquiries by Commissioners
35 Inquiries by Commissioners
35 Inquiries by Commissioners
(1) Where proceedings are pending in Class 3 of the Court’s jurisdiction, the Court may, with the consent of the parties, direct that an inquiry into any issue raised in, or other matter connected with, the proceedings be made by a single Commissioner.
(2) The Commissioner making an inquiry pursuant to this section shall make a report to the Court.
(3) Where a report is made to the Court under subsection (2), the Court shall, as soon as practicable, furnish a copy of the report to each of the parties.
(4) The Court may, with the consent of the parties, adopt any findings or observations set out in a report under subsection (2).
(5) A Commissioner, in making an inquiry pursuant to this section, shall have and may exercise the functions of the Court under section 68 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005.
(6) A Commissioner who has made an inquiry pursuant to this section in relation to any proceedings is disqualified from further participation in those proceedings, unless the parties otherwise agree.
s 35: Am 1998 No 172, Sch 6 [10]; 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [20] [21].
36
Delegation to Commissioners
36 Delegation to Commissioners
36 Delegation to Commissioners
(1) Where proceedings are pending in Class 1, 2 or 3 of the Court’s jurisdiction (other than proceedings that are being dealt with under section 34A or 40), the Chief Judge—
(a) except as provided by paragraph (b) or subsection (1B), may, of the Chief Judge’s own motion or on the request of a party, direct that the proceedings be heard and disposed of by one or more Commissioners, and
direct that the proceedings be heard and disposed of by a Commissioner.
(1A) The Governor may, by regulation, amend Schedule 2 by—
(a) adding thereto any matter,
(b) altering any matter therein, or
(c) omitting any matter therefrom,
or may, by regulation, omit the Schedule and insert instead a new Schedule.
(1B) The Chief Judge may not direct under this section that proceedings under section 29, 30 or 31 of the Access to Neighbouring Land Act 2000 are to be heard and disposed of by one or more Commissioners.
(2) Subject to this Act and the rules, the Commissioner or Commissioners hearing and disposing of the proceedings pursuant to this section shall have and may exercise the functions of the Court (other than its functions under this section).
(3) The decision of the Commissioner or Commissioners shall be deemed to be the decision of the Court.
(4) Where proceedings are directed to be heard and disposed of by 2 or more Commissioners—
(a) if the Senior Commissioner is one of the Commissioners hearing and disposing of the proceedings—the Senior Commissioner shall preside at the hearing of the proceedings,
(b) if the Senior Commissioner is not one of those Commissioners—one of those Commissioners directed to do so by the Chief Judge shall preside at the hearing, and
(c) if the Commissioners are divided in opinion as to the decision to be made on any question—
(i) if there is a majority of the one opinion—the question shall be decided according to the opinion of the majority, or
(ii) in any other case—the question shall be decided according to the opinion of the Commissioner presiding.
(5) Proceedings that are before a Commissioner under section 34, or under this section, may be referred or removed for hearing and determination by a Judge in the same way as proceedings before an associate Judge may be referred or removed for hearing and determination by a Judge in the Supreme Court.
(6) The power of a Commissioner to refer proceedings pursuant to subsection (5) is subject to any contrary order of the Chief Judge.
(7) (Repealed)
s 36: Am 1983 No 42, Sch 3; 1994 No 32, Sch 3; 1998 No 172, Sch 6 [6] [7] [12]; 1999 No 31, Sch 2.20 [4]; 2000 No 2, Sch 1 [2] [3]; 2002 No 76, Sch 1 [9]; 2006 No 107, Sch 1.19 [10]; 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [22]; 2008 No 53, Sch 13 [8].
37
Commissioners sitting with a Judge
37 Commissioners sitting with a Judge
37 Commissioners sitting with a Judge
(1) Where proceedings are pending in Class 1, 2, 3 or 4 of the Court’s jurisdiction before a Judge (other than proceedings that are being dealt with under section 34A), the Court may, in hearing the proceedings, or any part of the proceedings, be assisted by one or more Commissioners.
(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), where proceedings are pending in Class 3 of the Court’s jurisdiction, being proceedings—
the Court shall, in hearing the proceedings or any part of the proceedings, be assisted by 2 Commissioners or, if the Chief Judge so directs, by one Commissioner.
(3) A Commissioner assisting the Court as referred to in subsection (1) or (2) may assist and advise the Court, but shall not adjudicate on any matter before the Court.
(4) A Judge before whom proceedings referred to in subsection (1) or (2) are pending may commence or continue the hearing of the proceedings, or any part of the proceedings—
(a) without the assistance of a Commissioner who is not available or has ceased to be available to assist in the hearing of the proceedings or part of the proceedings, and
(b) without the assistance of Commissioners generally if, in the opinion of the Judge, the proceedings or part of the proceedings concern or concerns a question of law only.
s 37: Am 1983 No 42, Sch 3; 1987 No 162, Sch 1 (1); 1998 No 172, Sch 6 [7] [10]; 2002 No 76, Sch 1 [10]; 2006 No 107, Sch 1.19 [11]; 2015 No 2, Sch 4.3 [4].
38
Procedure
38 Procedure
38 Procedure
(1) Proceedings in Class 1, 2 or 3 of the Court’s jurisdiction shall be conducted with as little formality and technicality, and with as much expedition, as the requirements of this Act and of every other relevant enactment and as the proper consideration of the matters before the Court permit.
(2) In proceedings in Class 1, 2 or 3 of the Court’s jurisdiction, the Court is not bound by the rules of evidence but may inform itself on any matter in such manner as it thinks appropriate and as the proper consideration of the matters before the Court permits.
(3) Subject to the rules, and without limiting the generality of subsection (2), the Court may, in relation to proceedings in Class 1, 2 or 3 of the Court’s jurisdiction, obtain the assistance of any person having professional or other qualifications relevant to any issue arising for determination in the proceedings and may receive in evidence the certificate of any such person.
(4) In proceedings in Class 1, 2 or 3 of the Court’s jurisdiction, the Court may, in respect of a matter not dealt with by this Act or the rules, give directions as to the procedure to be followed at or in connection with the hearing.
(5) In this section, a reference to the Court includes a reference to the Commissioner or Commissioners directed under section 36 to hear and dispose of proceedings.
39
Powers of Court on appeals
39 Powers of Court on appeals
39 Powers of Court on appeals
(1) In this section, appeal means an appeal, objection, reference or other matter which may be disposed of by the Court in proceedings in Class 1, 2 or 3 of its jurisdiction.
(2) In addition to any other functions and discretions that the Court has apart from this subsection, the Court shall, for the purposes of hearing and disposing of an appeal, have all the functions and discretions which the person or body whose decision is the subject of the appeal had in respect of the matter the subject of the appeal.
(3) An appeal in respect of such a decision shall be by way of rehearing, and fresh evidence or evidence in addition to, or in substitution for, the evidence given on the making of the decision may be given on the appeal.
(4) In making its decision in respect of an appeal, the Court shall have regard to this or any other relevant Act, any instrument made under any such Act, the circumstances of the case and the public interest.
(5) The decision of the Court upon an appeal shall, for the purposes of this or any other Act or instrument, be deemed, where appropriate, to be the final decision of the person or body whose decision is the subject of the appeal and shall be given effect to accordingly.
(6) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, if an appeal relates to an application made to a council within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 or a consent authority within the meaning of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and that council or consent authority may not approve of, consent to, or deal with, or grant a permission in respect of, the application except after consultation with, or with the concurrence or approval of, any person or body—
(a) the Court may determine the appeal whether or not the consultation has taken place and whether or not the concurrence or approval has been granted, and
(b) in a case where the concurrence or approval has been granted—the Court may vary or revoke any conditions imposed by that person or body or may impose any conditions that could have been imposed by that person or body.
(6A) (Repealed)
(7) The functions of the Court under this section are in addition to and not in derogation from any other functions of the Court.
(b) proceedings on an appeal under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 with respect to the granting or modification of a development consent are pending before the Court (whether constituted by a Judge or by one or more Commissioners).
(2) The appellant may make an application to the Court for an order imposing an easement over land.
(3) The parties to an application under this section include the owner of the land to be burdened by the easement, and each other person having an estate or interest in the land, as evidenced by an instrument registered in the General Register of Deeds or the Register kept under the Real Property Act 1900.
(4) In dealing with an application under this section, the Court may exercise the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under section 88K of the Conveyancing Act 1919 and, in that event, section 88K of the Conveyancing Act 1919 applies to the Court’s exercise of that jurisdiction in the same way as it applies to the exercise of that jurisdiction by the Supreme Court.
s 40: Am 1993 No 32, Sch 2; 1994 No 32, Sch 3. Subst 2002 No 76, Sch 1 [12]; 2008 No 53, Sch 13 [9]; 2008 No 107, Sch 14 [9].
Division 5
Special provisions respecting Class 5 proceedings (summary jurisdiction)
Division 5 Special provisions respecting Class 5 proceedings (summary jurisdiction)
Division 5 Special provisions respecting Class 5 proceedings (summary jurisdiction)
Part 5 of Chapter 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 applies to proceedings in Class 5 of the Court’s jurisdiction.
s 41: Am 1994 No 32, Sch 3. Subst 2001 No 121, Sch 2.132 [3].
Division 6
Special provisions respecting Class 8 proceedings (mining matters)
Division 6 Special provisions respecting Class 8 proceedings (mining matters)
Division 6 Special provisions respecting Class 8 proceedings (mining matters)
pt 4, div 6: Ins 2008 No 107, Sch 14 [10].
41A
Mandatory conciliation and arbitration
41A Mandatory conciliation and arbitration
41A Mandatory conciliation and arbitration
(1) This section applies to proceedings relating to small-scale titles that are pending in Class 8 of the Court’s jurisdiction to hear and dispose of proceedings arising under the Mining Act 1992 other than proceedings relating to a matter referred to in section 293(1)(q) of that Act.
(2) Section 34 applies to the proceedings (in the same way as it applies to proceedings in Class 1, 2 or 3 of the Court’s jurisdiction) but with the following modifications—
(a) the Court must arrange a conciliation conference between the parties and their representatives with or without their consent at such place as the Court determines,
(b) if no agreement of a kind referred to in section 34(3) is reached, the Commissioner who presides over the conciliation conference must terminate the conciliation conference and, subject to this section, dispose of the proceedings—
(i) following a hearing held forthwith, or
(ii) if the parties consent, on the basis of what has occurred at the conciliation conference.
(3) The Court or the Commissioner may at any time, if the Court or Commissioner thinks it appropriate in the circumstances of the case, determine that proceedings are not to be dealt with or are not to continue to be dealt with under subsection (2). A determination may be made on the motion of the Court or Commissioner or on application by the parties.
(4) If the Court or Commissioner determines that proceedings are not to be dealt with or are not to continue to be dealt with under subsection (2), the proceedings are to be dealt with as a hearing in court and sections 38 and 39 apply as far as is relevant as if the proceedings were proceedings in Class 1, 2 or 3 of the Court’s jurisdiction.
s 41A: Ins 2014 No 53, Sch 2.1.
42
Delegation to Commissioners
42 Delegation to Commissioners
42 Delegation to Commissioners
(1) Where proceedings are pending in Class 8 of the Court’s jurisdiction, the Chief Judge may, of the Chief Judge’s own motion or on the request of a party, direct that the proceedings be heard and disposed of by one or more Commissioners.
(2) Subject to this Act and the rules, the Commissioner or Commissioners hearing and disposing of the proceedings pursuant to this section shall have and may exercise the functions of the Court (other than its functions under this section).
(3) The decision of the Commissioner or Commissioners shall be deemed to be the decision of the Court.
(4) Where proceedings are directed to be heard and disposed of by 2 or more Commissioners—
(a) if the Senior Commissioner is one of the Commissioners hearing and disposing of the proceedings—the Senior Commissioner shall preside at the hearing of the proceedings, and
(b) if the Senior Commissioner is not one of those Commissioners—one of those Commissioners directed to do so by the Chief Judge shall preside at the hearing, and
(c) if the Commissioners are divided in opinion as to the decision to be made on any question—
(i) if there is a majority of the one opinion—the question shall be decided according to the opinion of the majority, or
(ii) in any other case—the question shall be decided according to the opinion of the Commissioner presiding.
(5) Proceedings that are before a Commissioner under this section may be referred or removed for hearing and determination by a Judge in the same way as proceedings before an associate Judge may be referred or removed for hearing and determination by a Judge in the Supreme Court.
(6) The power of a Commissioner to refer proceedings pursuant to subsection (5) is subject to any contrary order of the Chief Judge.
s 42: Subst 1979 No 205, Sch 2, Part 2. Am 1994 No 32, Sch 3. Rep 2001 No 121, Sch 2.132 [3]. Ins 2008 No 107, Sch 14 [10].
s 42A: Ins 1979 No 205, Sch 2, Part 2. Rep 2001 No 121, Sch 2.132 [3].
43
Commissioners sitting with a Judge
43 Commissioners sitting with a Judge
43 Commissioners sitting with a Judge
(1) Where proceedings are pending in Class 8 of the Court’s jurisdiction before a Judge, the Court may, in hearing the proceedings, or any part of the proceedings, be assisted by one or more Commissioners.
(2) A Commissioner assisting the Court as referred to in subsection (1) may assist and advise the Court, but shall not adjudicate on any matter before the Court.
(3) A Judge before whom proceedings referred to in subsection (1) are pending may commence or continue the hearing of the proceedings, or any part of the proceedings—
(a) without the assistance of a Commissioner who is not available or has ceased to be available to assist in the hearing of the proceedings or part of the proceedings, and
(b) without the assistance of Commissioners generally if, in the opinion of the Judge, the proceedings or part of the proceedings concern or concerns a question of law only.
s 43: Rep 2001 No 121, Sch 2.132 [3]. Ins 2008 No 107, Sch 14 [10].
44
44
44–55 (Repealed)
Part 5
Appeals from the Court
Part 5 Appeals from the Court
Part 5 Appeals from the Court
56
Nature of decision of the Court
56 Nature of decision of the Court
56 Nature of decision of the Court
Except as provided—
(a) by Division 2, in relation to proceedings in Class 1, 2, 3, 4 or 8 of the Court’s jurisdiction, or
(b) by the Criminal Appeal Act 1912, in relation to proceedings in Class 5, 6 or 7 of the Court’s jurisdiction,
a decision of the Court shall be final and conclusive.
s 56: Am 1990 No 84, Sch 2; 1999 No 39, Sch 5 [8]; 2008 No 107, Sch 14 [11].
56A
Class 1, 2, 3 and 8 proceedings—appeals to the Court against decisions of Commissioners
56A Class 1, 2, 3 and 8 proceedings—appeals to the Court against decisions of Commissioners
56A Class 1, 2, 3 and 8 proceedings—appeals to the Court against decisions of Commissioners
(1) A party to proceedings in Class 1, 2, 3 or 8 of the Court’s jurisdiction may appeal to the Court against an order or a decision of the Court on a question of law, being an order or a decision made by a Commissioner or Commissioners.
(2) On the hearing of an appeal under subsection (1), the Court shall—
(a) remit the matter to the Commissioner or Commissioners for determination by the Commissioner or Commissioners in accordance with the decision of the Court, or
(b) make such other order in relation to the appeal as seems fit.
(3) Notwithstanding subsection (1), an appeal shall not lie to the Court under that subsection in respect of a question of law that has been referred to, and determined by, a Judge pursuant to section 36.
s 56A: Ins 1985 No 63, Sch 1 (4). Am 1998 No 172, Sch 6 [7] [12]; 2008 No 107, Sch 14 [12].
57
Class 1, 2, 3 and 8 proceedings—appeals
57 Class 1, 2, 3 and 8 proceedings—appeals
57 Class 1, 2, 3 and 8 proceedings—appeals
(1) A party to proceedings in Class 1, 2, 3 or 8 of the Court’s jurisdiction may appeal to the Supreme Court against an order or decision (including an interlocutory order or decision) of the Court on a question of law.
(2) On the hearing of an appeal under subsection (1), the Supreme Court shall—
(a) remit the matter to the Court for determination by the Court in accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court, or
(b) make such other order in relation to the appeal as seems fit.
(3) Despite subsection (1), an appeal does not lie to the Supreme Court against an order or decision of the Court that has been made by a Commissioner or Commissioners, other than a decision of the kind referred to in subsection (4)(a) or (b).
(4) Despite subsection (1), an appeal does not lie to the Supreme Court against any of the following orders or decisions of the Court except by leave of the Supreme Court—
(a) a decision on a question of law determined by a judge pursuant to a reference under section 36(5),
(b) a decision of a Commissioner or Commissioners made after a judge’s determination referred to in paragraph (a), where the judge’s determination is itself the subject of an appeal to the Supreme Court,
(c) an order or decision made on an appeal under section 56A,
(d) an interlocutory order or decision,
(e) an order made with the consent of the parties,
(f) an order or decision as to costs.
s 57: Am 1985 No 63, Sch 1 (5); 1987 No 162, Sch 1 (2); 1998 No 172, Sch 6 [7] [12]; 2000 No 31, Sch 10 [1] [2]; 2002 No 99, Sch 3.5 [1]; 2008 No 107, Sch 14 [13].
58
Class 4 proceedings—appeals
58 Class 4 proceedings—appeals
58 Class 4 proceedings—appeals
(1) Where a party to proceedings in Class 4 of the Court’s jurisdiction is dissatisfied with an order or decision (including an interlocutory order or decision) of the Court, the party may appeal to the Supreme Court against the order or decision.
(2) On the hearing of an appeal under subsection (1), the Supreme Court shall—
(a) make an order reversing, affirming or amending the order or decision appealed against,
(b) remit the matter to the Court for determination by the Court in accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court,
(c) make an order directing a rehearing of the proceedings in respect of which the order or decision appealed against was made, or
(d) make such other order in relation to the appeal as seems fit.
(3) Despite subsection (1), an appeal does not lie to the Supreme Court against any of the following orders or decisions of the Court except by leave of the Supreme Court—
(a) an interlocutory order or decision,
(b) an order made with the consent of the parties,
(c) an order or decision as to costs.
(4) The amendment made to this section by the Courts Legislation Further Amendment Act 1995 does not operate to require leave to appeal against an order or decision of the Court if, when the order or decision was made, an appeal lay as of right.
s 58: Am 1987 No 162, Sch 1 (3); 1995 No 88, Sch 1.5 [1] [2]; 2002 No 99, Sch 3.5 [2].
59
Suspension of operation of order etc
59 Suspension of operation of order etc
59 Suspension of operation of order etc
(1) Where an appeal is made to the Supreme Court under this Division, either the Court or the Supreme Court may suspend the operation of any relevant order or decision until the Supreme Court makes its decision.
(2) Where an appeal is made to the Court under this Division, the Court may suspend the operation of any relevant order or decision until the Court makes its decision.
s 59: Am 1985 No 63, Sch 1 (6).
60
Termination of suspension
60 Termination of suspension
60 Termination of suspension
(1) Where, under section 59(1), the Court has suspended the operation of an order or decision, the Court or Supreme Court may terminate the suspension and, where the Supreme Court has suspended the operation of any such order or decision, the Supreme Court may terminate the suspension.
(2) Where, under section 59(2), the Court has suspended the operation of an order or a decision, the Court may terminate the suspension.
s 60: Am 1985 No 63, Sch 1 (7).
61
Manner in which appeals to the Court to be made
61 Manner in which appeals to the Court to be made
61 Manner in which appeals to the Court to be made
(1) (Repealed)
(2) An appeal to the Court under this Division shall be made in such manner, and be subject to such conditions, as are prescribed by the rules.
s 61: Subst 1985 No 63, Sch 1 (8). Am 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [23].
Part 5A
Part 5A
Part 5A
61A–61L (Repealed)
pt 5A: Ins 1994 No 57, Sch 1. Rep 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [24].
s 61A: Ins 1994 No 57, Sch 1. Am 2005 No 31, Sch 8 [1]. Rep 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [24].
s 61B: Ins 1994 No 57, Sch 1. Rep 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [24].
s 61C: Ins 1994 No 57, Sch 1. Rep 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [24].
s 61D: Ins 1994 No 57, Sch 1. Subst 2005 No 31, Sch 8 [2]. Rep 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [24].
s 61E: Ins 1994 No 57, Sch 1. Subst 2005 No 31, Sch 8 [2]. Rep 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [24].
ss 61F–61L: Ins 1994 No 57, Sch 1. Rep 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [24].
Part 6
Miscellaneous
Part 6 Miscellaneous
Part 6 Miscellaneous
62
Proceedings in open court
62 Proceedings in open court
62 Proceedings in open court
All proceedings before the Court shall, unless the Court otherwise orders, be heard in open court.
63
Right of appearance
63 Right of appearance
63 Right of appearance
(1) A person entitled to appear before the Court may appear in person, or by an Australian legal practitioner, or (except in proceedings in Class 5, 6 or 7 of the Court’s jurisdiction) by an agent authorised by the person in writing.
(2) Despite subsection (1), a person may not appear before the Court by an agent except with the leave of the Court.
(3) In determining whether to grant leave for a person to appear by an agent the Court is to consider—
(a) whether the agent has provided the person with the information required by the rules, and
(b) whether granting leave is in the best interests of the person.
(4) Leave granted under this section may—
(a) be granted subject to conditions, and
(b) be revoked at any time for any reason.
s 63: Am 1990 No 84, Sch 2; 1999 No 39, Sch 5 [8]; 2006 No 120, Sch 3.14 [2]; 2008 No 107, Sch 14 [14]; 2012 No 60, Sch 10 [2] [3].
64
Appearance by the Crown
64 Appearance by the Crown
64 Appearance by the Crown
(1) The Crown may appear before the Court in any case in which the public interest or any right or interest of the Crown may be affected or involved.
(2) Without affecting the generality of subsection (1), the Attorney General or the Minister for Planning and Environment, or both, may, at any stage of any proceedings before the Court, intervene by an Australian legal practitioner or an agent, and may examine witnesses and address the Court with respect to matters relevant to the proceedings.
(3) Without affecting the generality of subsection (1), the Minister administering the Community Welfare Act 1987 may, at any stage of any proceedings before the Court in which an approved non-Government organisation within the meaning of that Act is a party, with the consent of that organisation, intervene by an Australian legal practitioner or an agent and may examine witnesses and address the Court with respect to matters relevant to the proceedings.
s 64: Am 1987 No 58, Sch 3; 2006 No 120, Sch 3.14 [3].
65
Issue of process
65 Issue of process
65 Issue of process
All process issuing out of the Court shall be in the form approved under section 77A and be signed or otherwise authenticated in accordance with the rules.
s 65: Am 2002 No 70, Sch 2 [1]; 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [25].
66
Judicial notice of certain signatures
66 Judicial notice of certain signatures
66 Judicial notice of certain signatures
Judicial notice shall be taken of the signature of a Judge, a Commissioner, the Registrar or the Assistant Registrar when appearing on a document issuing out of the Court.
s 66: Am 1998 No 172, Sch 6 [7]; 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [7].
67
Powers of the Court as to the production of evidence
67 Powers of the Court as to the production of evidence
67 Powers of the Court as to the production of evidence
(1) The Court shall have and may exercise the functions vested in the Supreme Court in respect of the following matters—
(a) compelling the attendance of witnesses and examining them on oath, affirmation or declaration,
(b) compelling the production, discovery and inspection of books, records, documents and other papers,
(c) compelling witnesses to answer questions which the Court considers to be relevant in any proceeding before it,
(d) the apprehension, detention and punishment of persons guilty of contempt, or of disobedience to any order made by the Court, or of any process issuing out of the Court, and
(e) directing witnesses to be prosecuted for perjury.
(2) This section does not apply to proceedings in Class 1, 2, 3 or 4 of the Court’s jurisdiction.
s 67: Am 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [26].
67A
Disrespectful behaviour in Court
67A Disrespectful behaviour in Court
67A Disrespectful behaviour in Court
(1) Offence A person is guilty of an offence against this section if—
(a) the person is an accused person or defendant in, or a party to, proceedings before the Court or has been called to give evidence in proceedings before the Court, and
(b) the person intentionally engages in behaviour in the Court during the proceedings, and
(c) that behaviour is disrespectful to the Court or the Judge presiding over the proceedings (according to established court practice and convention).
Maximum penalty—14 days imprisonment or 10 penalty units, or both.
(2) In this section, behaviour means any act or failure to act.
(3) This section does not apply to an Australian legal practitioner appearing in that capacity.
(4) Proceedings for offences Proceedings against a person for an offence against this section are to be dealt with summarily before—
(a) if the person is a child—the Children’s Court, or
(b) if the person is not a child—the Local Court.
(5) Proceedings for an offence against this section may be brought at any time within 12 months after the date of the alleged offence.
(6) Proceedings for an offence against this section may be brought only by a person or a member of a class of persons authorised, in writing, by the Secretary of the Department of Justice for that purpose.
(7) A Judge may refer any disrespectful behaviour in proceedings over which the Judge is presiding to the Attorney General.
(8) Proceedings for an offence against this section may be commenced only with the authorisation of the Attorney General. Authorisation may be given by the Attorney General whether or not the disrespectful behaviour is referred to the Attorney General by a Judge under this section.
(9) Evidence An official transcript or official audio or video recording of the proceedings in the Court is admissible in evidence in proceedings for an offence against this section and is evidence of the matter included in the transcript or audio or video recording.
(10) The Judge presiding over the proceedings in which the alleged disrespectful behaviour occurred cannot be required to give evidence in proceedings before any court for an offence against this section.
(11) Contempt and double jeopardy This section does not affect any power with respect to contempt or the exercise of any such power.
(12) A person cannot be prosecuted for an offence against this section and proceeded against for contempt in respect of essentially the same behaviour. However, nothing in this section prevents proceedings for contempt in respect of behaviour that constitutes an offence against this section.
(13) This section does not apply in Class 1, 2, 3 or 4 of the Court’s jurisdiction.
s 67A: Ins 2016 No 26, Sch 2.
68
Amendments and irregularities
68 Amendments and irregularities
68 Amendments and irregularities
(1) In any proceedings before the Court, the Court shall have power at any stage of the proceeding to order, upon such terms as to costs or otherwise as the Court thinks fit, any amendments to be made which, in the opinion of the Court, are necessary in the interests of justice.
(2) Where, in beginning or purporting to begin any proceedings before the Court or at any stage in the course of or in connection with any such proceedings, there is, by reason of anything done or left undone, a failure to comply with the requirements of this Act or of the rules whether in respect of time, place, manner, form or content or in any other respect—
(a) the failure shall be treated as an irregularity and shall not nullify the proceedings, or any step taken in the proceedings, or any document, judgment or order in the proceedings, and
(b) subject to subsection (3), the Court may, on terms, set aside wholly or in part the proceedings or any step taken in the proceedings or any document, judgment or order in the proceedings or exercise its functions under this Act and the rules to allow amendments and to make orders dealing with the proceedings generally.
(3) The Court shall not set aside any proceedings before it or any step taken in any such proceedings or any document, judgment or order in any such proceedings on the ground of a failure to which subsection (2) applies on the application of any party unless the application is made within a reasonable time and before the applicant has taken any fresh step after becoming aware of the irregularity.
(4) This section does not apply to proceedings in Class 1, 2, 3 or 4 of the Court’s jurisdiction.
s 68: Am 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [27].
69
69
69–70 (Repealed)
71
Proceedings in Supreme Court
71 Proceedings in Supreme Court
71 Proceedings in Supreme Court
(1) Subject to section 58, proceedings of the kind referred to in section 20(1)(e) may not be commenced or entertained in the Supreme Court.
(2) The jurisdiction conferred on the Court in respect of proceedings referred to in section 20(1)(e) is not limited by any provision of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 or the uniform rules under that Act.
s 71: Am 1980 No 77, Sch 1 (4); 1985 No 115, Sch 1 (3); 1986 No 220, Sch 1; 1993 No 12, Sch 2; 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [29].
72
Transfer of proceedings from Supreme Court
72 Transfer of proceedings from Supreme Court
72 Transfer of proceedings from Supreme Court
(1) Where the Supreme Court is of opinion that any proceedings commenced or purporting to have been commenced in the Supreme Court could or should have been commenced in the Court, the Supreme Court may, on the application of any party or of its own motion, order that those proceedings be transferred to the Court.
(2) This section does not apply to proceedings in Class 1, 2, 3, 4 or 8 of the Court’s jurisdiction.
s 72: Am 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [30]; 2008 No 107, Sch 14 [15].
(1) Subject to the rules, any proceedings with respect to which an order under section 72 is made are to continue in the Court as if they had been duly commenced in the Court on the date on which they were commenced in the Supreme Court.
(2) For the purposes of any proceedings continued in the Court, any admission duly made in the Supreme Court is to be treated as if it had been duly made in the Court.
(3) Subject to the rules, the power of the Court to make orders as to costs includes a power to make orders with respect to the costs of—
(a) the application for, and the making of, the order under section 72, and
(b) any step taken in the proceedings before the order under section 72 was made.
s 73: Am 1993 No 87, Sch 6. Subst 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [31].
74
Rules
74 Rules
74 Rules
(1) The Chief Judge and any 2 other Judges may make rules for or with respect to—
(a) the procedure (including the method of pleading) and the practice to be followed in the Court in any proceedings (including the procedure and practice to be followed in the offices of the Court) and any matters incidental to, or relating to, any such procedure or practice, including the manner and time of making any application or appeal which under this or any other Act or Commonwealth Act is to be made to the Court,
(b) the joinder of causes of action, the consolidation of proceedings, and the joinder, misjoinder and non-joinder of parties,
(c) the means for, and the practice and procedure to be followed in, the enforcement and execution of decisions, judgments and orders of the Court,
(d) the furnishing of security,
(e) the costs of proceedings in the Court, and
(f) all matters that by this Act are required or permitted to be prescribed by rules or that are necessary or convenient to be prescribed by rules for carrying out or giving effect to this Act.
(2) Without affecting the generality of subsection (1), rules may be made, in relation to matters within the jurisdiction of the Court, for or with respect to matters for or with respect to which rules may be made under the Supreme Court Act 1970 or the Civil Procedure Act 2005, including rules that may be so made by virtue of section 257 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986, or any other Act.
(4) Rules may be made so as to apply differently according to such factors as may be specified in the rules.
(5) While there are no Judges other than the Chief Judge, the reference in subsection (1) to other Judges shall be deemed to be omitted, and while there is only one such Judge, that reference shall be construed as a reference to that Judge.
(6) This section does not give power to make rules with respect to—
(7) The rules made under this section may authorise or require the use of an electronic case management system established under clause 2 of Schedule 1 to the Electronic Transactions Act 2000 in relation to any proceedings in a court in respect of which the use of such a system is authorised by an order in force under clause 3 of Schedule 1 to that Act.
(8) The rules made under this section may provide for the exercise by the Registrar or any other officer of the Court of any of the Court’s administrative or judicial functions under this or any other Act and for the review by the Court of the exercise by the Registrar or any other such officer of any such function.
s 74: Am 1993 No 87, Sch 6; 1994 No 32, Sch 3; 1994 No 57, Sch 1; 1999 No 39, Sch 5 [9]; 2001 No 121, Sch 2.132 [4]; 2005 No 28, Sch 5.24 [2] [3]; 2006 No 120, Sch 3.14 [6]; 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [32] [33]; 2010 No 119, Sch 2.27 [1] [2]; 2011 No 62, Sch 2.17; 2015 No 7, Sch 2.25.
75
Court may dispense with rules in particular cases
75 Court may dispense with rules in particular cases
75 Court may dispense with rules in particular cases
(1) In relation to particular proceedings, the Court may give directions with respect to any aspect of practice or procedure for which the rules or practice notes do not provide.
(2) Anything done in accordance with such a direction (including the commencing of proceedings and the taking of any step in proceedings) is taken to have been validly done.
(3) This section does not apply to proceedings in Class 1, 2, 3 or 4 of the Court’s jurisdiction.
s 77: Rep 1987 No 48, Sch 32. Ins 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [34].
(a) may approve forms for documents to be used in connection with proceedings, and
(b) in the case of documents filed with a court, or issued by a court, by means of an ECM system within the meaning of the Electronic Transactions Act 2000, may approve the format in which such documents are to be filed or issued.
(2) Copies of the approved forms are to be made available for public inspection at each registry of the Court and on the Court’s internet website.
(3) If a form is approved in relation to a document to be used in connection with proceedings, a document that is filed with or issued by the Court is to be in that form.
(4) If a form is approved under section 17 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 in relation to the same matter as that for which a form is approved under subsection (1), the form to be used is the form approved under subsection (1).
s 77A: Ins 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [34].
78
Regulations
78 Regulations
78 Regulations
The Governor may make regulations, not inconsistent with this Act, for or with respect to—
(a) fixing or otherwise relating to fees and percentages to be taken in respect of the business of the Court,
(aa) the leave which may be granted to Commissioners,
(b) the appointment of persons to panels from which persons may be appointed as acting Commissioners, and
(c) all matters that by this Act are required or permitted to be prescribed by regulations or that are necessary or convenient to be prescribed by regulations for carrying out or giving effect to this Act.
s 78: Am 1985 No 63, Sch 1 (9).
79
Savings, transitional and other provisions
79 Savings, transitional and other provisions
79 Savings, transitional and other provisions
Schedule 3 has effect.
s 79: Ins 1997 No 47, Sch 4 [3].
Schedule 1
The Commissioners
Schedule 1 The Commissioners
Schedule 1 The Commissioners
(Section 12)
sch 1, hdg: Am 1998 No 172, Sch 6 [14].
sch 1: Am 1985 No 63, Sch 1 (10); 1990 No 99, Sch 4; 1994 No 32, Sch 3; 1998 No 172, Sch 6 [7] [9]–[11] [15]; 2002 No 76, Sch 1 [13]–[18]; 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [35]; 2015 No 15, Sch 3.37 [2]–[6].
2A
Leave entitlements
2A Leave entitlements
2A Leave entitlements
Subject to this Act and the regulations, the leave which may be granted to Commissioners shall be as determined by the Minister from time to time.
(2) Any such provision may, if the regulations so provide, take effect from the date of assent to the Act concerned or a later date.
(3) To the extent to which any such provision takes effect from a date that is earlier than the date of its publication in the Gazette, the provision does not operate so as—
(a) to affect, in a manner prejudicial to any person (other than the State or an authority of the State), the rights of that person existing before the date of its publication, or
(b) to impose liabilities on any person (other than the State or an authority of the State) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of its publication.
Source text: opening excerpt
Sourced from legislation.nsw.gov.au, CC BY 4.0.
Part 1 Preliminary
Part 1 Preliminary
Part 1 Preliminary
1 Name of Act
1 Name of Act
1 Name of Act
This Act may be cited as the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
2 Commencement
2 Commencement
2 Commencement
(1) This section and section 1 shall commence on the date of assent to this Act.
(2) Except as provided by this section, this Act shall commence on—
(a) such day as may be appointed by the Governor in respect thereof and as may be notified by proclamation published in the Gazette (being a day that is not later than the day referred to in paragraph (b)), or
(b) if a day is not appointed and notified under paragraph (a)—the day appointed and notified under section 2(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
(3) Section 71 shall commence on the day appointed and notified under section 2(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
(4) No proceedings shall be commenced in the Court before the day appointed and notified under section 2(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
3
3 (Repealed)
3
s 3: Rep 1985 No 63, Sch 1 (1).
4 Definitions
4 Definitions
4 Definitions
(1) In this Act, except in so far as the context or subject-matter otherwise indicates or requires—
Chief Judge means the Chief Judge of the Court.
Commissioner means a person appointed as a Commissioner of the Court under Division 3 of Part 2.
Court means the Land and Environment Court constituted under this Act.
court hearing matter—see section 34A(5).
functions includes powers, authorities and duties.
Judge means a Judge of the Court.
mandatory judicial retirement age means the maximum age at which a Judge is required by law to retire.
Note.
Section 44 of the provided for a maximum retirement age for Judges of 72 years before its amendment by the .
The Act mandates that the Court grant all appropriate remedies so that matters in controversy are completely and finally determined and multiplicity of proceedings is avoided (s 22). It confers broad powers to make orders, including interlocutory orders (s 23). In compensation claims under compulsory acquisition statutes the Court determines both the interest claimed and the amount payable (ss 24–25). Division 3 of Part 3 (ss 25A–25E) empowers the Court, instead of invalidating a development consent, to suspend its operation and specify terms whose substantial compliance will validate the consent or allow re-grant; the Court is under a positive duty to consider making such an order (s 25E).
Part 4 governs exercise of jurisdiction. Classes 1, 2 and 3 are heard by a Judge or Commissioner(s) (s 33(1)); Classes 4–7 by a Judge (s 33(2)); Class 8 by a Judge or lawyer Commissioner (s 33(2A)). Conciliation conferences are central: the Court may (and in certain Class 1 development appeals must) arrange them; parties must participate in good faith (s 34(1A)); if agreement is reached the Commissioner must dispose of the proceedings accordingly (s 34(3)). If no agreement, the Commissioner may dispose of the matter after a hearing or, with consent, on the basis of the conference (s 34(4)(b)). On-site hearing matters (s 34A) for smaller, low-impact developments are heard on site by Commissioner(s) (s 34B). Court hearing matters follow more formal tracks (s 34C). Commissioners may conduct inquiries in Class 3 with party consent (s 35). The Chief Judge may delegate Class 1, 2 or 3 proceedings (other than those under ss 34A or 40) to Commissioner(s) (s 36), who then exercise the full functions of the Court (s 36(2)) and whose decision is the Court’s decision (s 36(3)).
The Court is not bound by the rules of evidence in Classes 1–3 and must conduct those proceedings with as little formality and technicality, and as much expedition, as proper consideration permits (s 38). On appeals the Court has all the functions and discretions of the original decision-maker, conducts a rehearing and may receive fresh evidence (s 39(2)–(3)). It must have regard to relevant Acts, instruments, the circumstances of the case and the public interest (s 39(4)). Its decision is deemed the decision of the original body (s 39(5)).
Appeals lie from Commissioners to a Judge on a question of law (s 56A) and from the Court to the Supreme Court on a question of law (Class 1–4, 8) or with leave in listed categories (s 57). Class 4 appeals are broader but still require leave for interlocutory, consent or costs orders (s 58). The Act contains machinery for suspension of orders pending appeal (ss 59–60), rules-making power (s 74), practice notes (s 76), and power to dispense with rules or give directions where rules are silent (ss 75, 77).
The Act therefore does far more than create a court; it designs a specialist, flexible, expert-driven jurisdiction that integrates substantive environmental laws with tailored procedural pathways intended to promote conciliation, efficiency and practical outcomes.
Who it affects
The Act directly constitutes and governs the Court’s judicial officers. The Governor appoints a Chief Judge and other Judges who must be under 70 years of age and either former judicial officers or Australian lawyers of at least seven years’ standing (ss 7–8). Judges enjoy the same rank, title, status and (subject to minor exceptions) remuneration as Supreme Court Judges (s 9). Acting Chief Judge and acting Judge mechanisms exist (ss 10–11), and Supreme Court Judges may sit by arrangement (s 11A). Commissioners are appointed by the Governor on the Minister’s recommendation; they must possess specialist knowledge in local government, planning, environmental science, land valuation, architecture, engineering, natural resource management, Aboriginal land rights or urban design/heritage, or be Australian lawyers (s 12(2)–(2AA)). The Minister must seek a balanced spread of qualifications (s 12(2AB)). Full-time, part-time, acting and Senior Commissioners are contemplated (s 12(2A)–(3)). Commissioners are disqualified if they have a pecuniary interest or are officers of a party authority (s 14).
The Registrar, Assistant Registrar and other officers are employed under the Government Sector Employment Act 2013 and exercise functions conferred by the Act, rules or regulations (s 15).
The Act’s procedural and jurisdictional provisions affect a wide range of litigants. In Class 1–3 matters applicants, objectors, consent authorities, councils, applicants for tree orders, neighbours, valuation appellants, compensation claimants, Aboriginal land councils and mining proponents are all subject to the Court’s rehearing powers (s 39), conciliation obligations (s 34(1A)) and, in appropriate cases, on-site inspections (s 34D). Class 4 civil enforcement proceedings can be brought by any person with standing under the relevant planning or environmental law; the broad supervisory jurisdiction (s 20(2)) enables declarations, injunctions, civil penalties and damages for breach of development contracts. Class 5 summary prosecutions are typically brought by regulatory authorities but the Court’s criminal jurisdiction extends to any offence an Act assigns to it (s 21(i)). Class 8 mining litigants include exploration licence holders, mining lease parties and the regulator.
Local councils, the Minister for Planning, heritage authorities, the Environment Protection Authority, WaterNSW, Biodiversity Conservation Division, local land services and numerous other agencies appear regularly both as decision-makers whose decisions are reviewed and as enforcers. Third parties—neighbours, community groups, industry associations—routinely exercise appeal rights or bring enforcement proceedings. The Crown may appear whenever the public interest or Crown rights are involved; the Attorney General or Planning Minister may intervene (s 64).
Finally, the Act affects legal practitioners and agents. Parties may appear in person, by Australian legal practitioner or (outside Classes 5–7) by agent with leave (s 63). The Court must consider whether the agent has given the information required by the rules and whether appearance by agent is in the client’s best interests (s 63(3)).
Key duties and rights
Parties in conciliation conferences under s 34 owe an explicit duty to participate in good faith (s 34(1A)). Failure may sound in costs or other sanctions although the Act does not spell out the precise remedy. Commissioners presiding at conciliation are disqualified from further participation unless parties agree (s 34(13)). A similar disqualification applies to Commissioners who have conducted an inquiry under s 35(6).
The Court itself is under a statutory duty when dealing with development consent invalidity applications to consider making a conditional validity order under ss 25B–25C instead of outright invalidation (s 25E). In Class 1–3 proceedings the Court must act with as little formality and technicality and as much expedition as proper consideration permits (s 38(1)) and is not bound by the rules of evidence (s 38(2)).
Judges and Commissioners must observe the disqualification rules in s 14. Commissioners must not, while part-time, appear as expert witnesses or act as representatives before the Court (s 12(2B)). Acting Commissioners and Judges may complete partly-heard matters after their term expires and are deemed to retain their functions and entitlements for that purpose (ss 11(3A)–(3B), 12(2C)–(2D), 13(6)–(7)).
Litigants in Class 1, 2 or 3 appeals enjoy a rehearing de novo with rights to call fresh evidence (s 39(3)) and the Court is required to exercise all the functions and discretions of the original decision-maker (s 39(2)). On compensation claims the Court determines both the nature of the interest and the quantum (s 25(1)) and may join other interested parties (s 25(2)).
Rights of appearance are regulated: leave is required for agents and the Court must apply the best-interests test (s 63). The Crown’s right to intervene is broad (s 64). Parties may seek orders imposing easements in certain development appeals (s 40).
The Chief Judge’s administrative powers include arranging sittings (s 29), allocating business having regard to Commissioners’ expertise (s 30(2)), and ensuring balanced qualification representation on the Commission (s 12(2AB)). Seniority rules for acting Chief Judge are prescribed in detail (s 10(1B)).
Penalties and enforcement
The Act itself creates few standalone offences. Section 67A, inserted in 2016, makes it an offence (maximum 14 days imprisonment or 10 penalty units or both) for an accused, defendant or witness in proceedings to intentionally engage in behaviour disrespectful to the Court or presiding Judge according to established practice. The offence is summary, must be authorised by the Attorney General, and does not affect contempt powers (s 67A(11)–(12)). It does not apply in Classes 1–4 (s 67A(13)).
The Court’s enforcement powers are primarily facilitative. In Classes 1–4 it may enforce its own judgments as if they were Supreme Court judgments (s 20(4)). It inherits the Supreme Court’s contempt powers via s 67(1)(d) although that section does not apply in Classes 1–4 (s 67(2)). In Class 5 it exercises summary criminal jurisdiction; in Classes 6–7 it hears appeals from Local Court environmental convictions.
Breach of a development consent validated on conditions under s 25B may still attract civil enforcement under s 20 or criminal prosecution under s 21. The Court’s power to make orders of any kind it thinks appropriate (s 23) includes mandatory injunctions, restraining orders, civil penalties where authorised by the underlying statute, and damages for breach of a development contract (s 20(2)(d)).
Costs are governed by the rules (s 74(1)(e)) and the Court’s general discretion. In conciliation, failure to participate in good faith may be relevant to costs although the Act does not expressly so provide. Irregularities do not nullify proceedings; the Court may cure them on terms (s 68).
How it interacts with other laws
The Act is a procedural and jurisdictional statute that constantly cross-refers. Its jurisdiction is almost entirely parasitic on other Acts (ss 17–21C list more than 50 separate provisions). The definition of “planning or environmental law” in s 20(3) is an ambulatory list that picks up the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016, Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997, National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 and many others “as respectively in force at any time, whether before, on or after 1 September 1980”.
Section 39(6) interacts with concurrence and consultation requirements in other statutes: the Court may determine an appeal even if concurrence has not been obtained and may vary or revoke conditions imposed by a concurring authority. The conditional validity regime in ss 25A–25E expressly extends to invalidity arising from non-compliance with mandatory requirements under s 4.60 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and to steps preliminary to grant.
Practice and procedure in Class 4 is assimilated to Supreme Court practice with adaptations (s 20(4)). Rules may adopt Supreme Court rules (s 74(3)). The Civil Procedure Act 2005 and Supreme Court Act 1970 apply to enforcement (s 20(4)) and to transferred proceedings (s 73). The Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (Part 5 of Chapter 4) governs Class 5 (s 41).
Commissioners’ employment conditions interact with the Government Sector Employment Act 2013 (ss 12(4), 13(5), Sch 1 cl 3) and the Statutory and Other Offices Remuneration Act 1975. Judicial pensions and retirement interact with the Judges’ Pensions Act 1953 and Judicial Officers Act 1986 (ss 4(1) note, 8, 11(4)–(5), 11A(3)(d)).
The Act carves out its own jurisdiction from the Supreme Court: proceedings under s 20(1)(e) may not be commenced in the Supreme Court (s 71(1)). Transfers from the Supreme Court are contemplated (s 72) and continue as if commenced in the Court (s 73).
Schedule 1 preserves superannuation and leave rights of Commissioners who were previously public servants or members of statutory bodies. Schedule 3 contains extensive savings and transitional provisions that interact with the Courts Legislation Amendment Act 2007, Planning Appeals Legislation Amendment Act 2010 and later amending Acts.
Recent changes and why
The text records numerous amendments. The 2007 amendments (Courts Legislation Amendment Act 2007 No 56) repealed former Div 1 and 2 of Part 4, substituted a new s 31 on irregularity of proceedings, substantially rewrote s 34 on conciliation conferences to strengthen the good-faith obligation and Commissioner powers, and inserted new ss 75–77 and 77A on dispensing with rules, practice notes, directions and forms. These changes were designed to modernise procedure, reduce technicality and align the Court’s practice with the Civil Procedure Act 2005.
The 2008 amendments (Courts and Crimes Legislation Further Amendment Act 2008 No 107) inserted Class 8 (s 21C), added new Class 4 heads of jurisdiction, expanded Commissioner delegation in Class 8 (new s 42) and clarified that Class 8 civil proceedings may be heard by a lawyer Commissioner. The change responded to the need for specialist mining dispute resolution outside the criminal jurisdiction.
The Planning Appeals Legislation Amendment Act 2010 No 120 introduced mandatory conciliation and arbitration for certain small-scale development appeals (s 34AA) and refined the definition of on-site hearing matters. The policy objective was to resolve simpler planning disputes more quickly and at lower cost through compulsory conciliation.
Later changes include the 2013 Courts and Other Legislation Further Amendment Act 2013 No 1 which extended the power of former Commissioners and Judges to complete part-heard matters (ss 11(3B), 12(2C)–(2D), 13(7)) to avoid wasted hearings. The 2016 insertion of s 67A created a specific offence of disrespectful behaviour to deal with courtroom disruption without always resorting to contempt.
Each set of amendments reflects a legislative judgment that the Court’s original 1979 framework required updating to accommodate new environmental statutes, to promote earlier resolution, to reduce costs, and to give the Court tools to cure technical invalidity rather than quash consents that can be salvaged.
Court challenges and controversies
The source text does not contain decided cases, but several provisions have generated ongoing doctrinal controversy visible on the face of the statute. The conditional validity regime (ss 25A–25E) was inserted in 1997 to overcome the previous “all or nothing” approach to development consent invalidity. Its extension to preliminary steps and mandatory requirements (s 25A(2)–(3)) and the positive duty on the Court to consider a conditional order (s 25E) remain controversial because they confer a quasi-legislative power to rewrite consents. Critics argue this blurs the judicial role; supporters say it prevents technical invalidity from halting meritorious development.
The good-faith obligation in conciliation (s 34(1A)) has no statutory definition or prescribed sanction within the Act. Whether “good faith” requires disclosure of all material facts, prohibits sharp practice, or merely requires attendance is left to judicial development. The privilege provisions (s 34(10)–(12)) create a complex carve-out from without-prejudice protection that has generated disputes about admissibility when parties later consent to tender of conference documents.
The disqualification rules for Commissioners (s 14) contain the curious statement that a decision is not vitiated by a Commissioner’s failure to disclose a pecuniary interest or affiliation (s 14(2)). This attempts to protect finality but raises natural justice questions that have been litigated in other contexts.
The allocation of Class 8 to lawyer Commissioners only (s 30(2C)) and the restriction on Commissioners whose sole qualification is Aboriginal land rights expertise (s 30(2B)) reflect policy choices that have been criticised as narrowing the pool of available decision-makers.
The broad supervisory jurisdiction in Class 4 (s 20(2)) and the list of “planning or environmental laws” in s 20(3) continue to generate boundary disputes about whether a particular statute falls inside or outside the definition.
Gotchas
Most practitioners do not realise that the duty to participate in a conciliation conference in good faith (s 34(1A)) is mandatory in every Class 1, 2 or 3 matter where a conference is arranged and that the Commissioner’s report under s 34(4)(a) can set out the issues in dispute, potentially influencing later costs arguments even though the report is not evidence.
The conditional validity power (ss 25B–25C) is not discretionary in the ordinary sense; s 25E imposes a positive duty on the Court to consider using it. Failure to address that duty can itself be a ground of appeal.
A Commissioner who has presided at a conciliation is disqualified from hearing the matter unless parties otherwise agree (s 34(13)). Many consent orders are made by the very Commissioner who conducted the conciliation; the “unless the parties otherwise agree” exception is frequently overlooked until after the event.
On-site hearing matters (s 34B) must be held on the site unless the Commissioner decides that would be unfair or impractical (s 34B(2)). The statutory preference for an on-site conference is stronger than many realise and can affect the practical preparation of evidence.
Section 14(2) provides that a decision is not vitiated by a Commissioner’s failure to disclose a disqualifying interest. This does not prevent a party from seeking to set the decision aside on natural justice grounds in the Supreme Court; the provision only protects the Land and Environment Court decision from internal collateral attack.
Acting Commissioners and Judges can finish part-heard matters after their term expires and are deemed to retain full powers (ss 11(3B), 12(2D), 13(7)). This “deeming” provision is often forgotten when calculating limitation periods or appeal rights.
The list of planning or environmental laws in s 20(3) is ambulatory and includes any statutory instrument made under them. A seemingly obscure regulation can therefore found Class 4 jurisdiction.
How to comply
Parties should assume a conciliation conference will be fixed in every Class 1, 2 or 3 matter and prepare accordingly. Senior representatives with actual authority must attend; “good faith” requires more than physical presence. A position paper exchanged in advance and a realistic willingness to compromise are prudent. If agreement is reached, ensure the signed document clearly records the terms so the Commissioner can dispose of the proceedings under s 34(3).
When drafting development applications or consents that may later be challenged, build in fallback positions that could satisfy a s 25B order. If you are the consent authority, keep detailed records of the decision-making process so that, if a conditional validity application is made, you can demonstrate what steps remain to be regularised.
In Class 4 enforcement proceedings, identify at the outset whether the relief sought falls under the specific heads in s 20(1) or the general supervisory jurisdiction in s 20(2). Plead the precise statutory source; the Court’s power to award damages for breach of a development contract (s 20(2)(d)) is not available in every case.
When appearing by agent under s 63, file the written authority and the information required by the rules before the first directions hearing. The Court will refuse leave if it is not satisfied that the client has been properly informed and that agent appearance is in the client’s best interests.
For compensation claims, lodge the claim in the form required by the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 or other applicable statute and be prepared for the Court to join other interest-holders under s 25(2). Valuation evidence must comply with the Court’s practice notes on expert evidence.
If you are a Commissioner or Judge, maintain a current pecuniary interest register and err on the side of disclosure under s 14(1)(c). A part-time Commissioner must never appear as an expert or advocate before the Court (s 12(2B)).
All practitioners should monitor practice notes issued under s 76; they have statutory force once published in the Gazette (s 76(2A)). Where the rules or a practice note is silent, apply promptly for a direction under s 77 before taking any step that might later be challenged as irregular.
Finally, keep limitation periods and appeal rights under review. Because decisions of Commissioners are decisions of the Court (s 36(3)), the 28-day appeal period under s 57 runs from the date of the Commissioner’s decision unless an extension is granted. The statutory duty to consider conditional validity (s 25E) must be addressed in every invalidity case; a submission that simply asks for a declaration of invalidity without addressing s 25E is incomplete.
Section 44 of the Judicial Officers Act 1986, as amended, has increased the maximum retirement age for Judges to 75 years. Clause 9 of Schedule 6 to the Judicial Officers Act 1986 provides that the new retirement age does not apply to Judges holding office who were appointed before the amendments commenced unless they consent to the change applying to them as required by section 55(2) of the Constitution Act 1902. The retirement age of 72 years continues to apply to Judges who do not consent to the increased retirement age applying to them.
on-site hearing matter—see section 34A(3).
practice note means a practice note issued under section 76.
Registrar means the Registrar of the Court.
regulations means regulations for the time being in force under this Act.
rules means rules of the Court.
(2) A reference in this Act to the exercise of a function includes, where that function is a duty, the performance of that duty.
s 4: Am 1998 No 172, Sch 6 [2] [3]; 2002 No 76, Sch 1 [1]; 2007 No 56, Sch 6 [1]–[4]; 2018 No 87, Sch 2.5 [1].
Part 2 Constitution of the Court
Part 2 Constitution of the Court
Part 2 Constitution of the Court
Division 1 Constitution
Division 1 Constitution
Division 1 Constitution
5 Constitution of the Court
5 Constitution of the Court
5 Constitution of the Court
(1) There is hereby constituted a superior court of record to be known as the Land and Environment Court.
(2) There shall be a seal of the Court, and any document required by or under this or any other Act or law to be sealed or stamped with the seal of the Court shall be so sealed or stamped.
6 Single Judge to constitute the Court
6 Single Judge to constitute the Court
6 Single Judge to constitute the Court
(1) All proceedings in the Court, and all business arising out of any such proceedings, shall, subject to this Act, be heard and disposed of before a Judge, who shall constitute the Court.
(2) Subsection (1) does not affect the provisions of this Act and the rules concerning the hearing and disposal of proceedings and business before one or more Commissioners or other officers of the Court.
Division 2 The Judges
Division 2 The Judges
Division 2 The Judges
7 Composition of the Court
7 Composition of the Court
7 Composition of the Court
The Court shall be composed of a Chief Judge appointed by the Governor and such other Judges as the Governor may from time to time appoint.
8 Appointment and qualifications of Judges
8 Appointment and qualifications of Judges
8 Appointment and qualifications of Judges
(1) The Governor may, by commission under the public seal of the State, appoint any qualified person to be a Judge.
(2) A person is qualified for appointment as a Judge if the person is under 70 years of age and—
(a) holds or has held a judicial office of this State or of the Commonwealth, another State or a Territory, or
(b) (Repealed)
(c) is an Australian lawyer of at least 7 years’ standing.
s 8: Am 1991 No 34, Sch 3; 1993 No 87, Sch 5; 1996 No 17, Sch 5.9 [1]; 2002 No 7, Sch 2; 2006 No 120, Sch 3.14 [1].
9 Remuneration etc
9 Remuneration etc
9 Remuneration etc
(1) (Repealed)
(2) Each Judge shall have the same rank, title, status and precedence and, except as provided by subsection (2A), the same remuneration and other rights as a Judge of the Supreme Court (other than the Chief Justice and the President of the Court of Appeal).
(2A) The Chief Judge shall have the same remuneration as the President of the Court of Appeal.
(3) (Repealed)
s 9: Am 1985 No 63, Sch 1 (2); 1986 No 100, Sch 4; 1991 No 34, Sch 3; 1996 No 17, Sch 5.9 [2]; 2016 No 48, Sch 2.25.
10 Acting Chief Judge
10 Acting Chief Judge
10 Acting Chief Judge
(1) The Governor may, by commission under the public seal of the State, appoint a Judge (but not an acting Judge) to be Acting Chief Judge during such period as the Chief Judge may be absent from duty.
(1A) While the Chief Judge is absent from Australia and an Acting Chief Judge has not been appointed under subsection (1), the senior Judge present in Australia is taken to be the Acting Chief Judge.
(1B) For the purposes only of subsection (1A)—
(a) the Judges shall have seniority between themselves according to the dates of their commissions as Judges under this Act, a Judge whose commission is dated earlier than that of another Judge being senior to that other Judge, and
(b) if the commissions of two or more Judges bear the same date, those Judges shall have seniority between themselves according to the seniority assigned to them by their commission or, failing any such assignment, according to the order of their being sworn.
(2) While holding office, the Acting Chief Judge shall have and may exercise the functions of the Chief Judge.
s 10: Am 1994 No 32, Sch 3; 2008 No 53, Sch 13 [1].
11 Acting Judges
11 Acting Judges
11 Acting Judges
(1) The Governor may, by commission under the public seal of the State, appoint any qualified person to act as a Judge for a time not exceeding 5 years to be specified in the commission.
(2) In subsection (1), qualified person means a person qualified for appointment as a Judge.
(3) The person so appointed shall, for the time and subject to the conditions or limitations specified in the person’s commission, have and may exercise the functions of a Judge and shall, for the purposes of this or any other Act, be deemed to be a Judge.
(3A) The person so appointed may, despite the expiration of the period of the person’s appointment, complete or otherwise continue to deal with any matters relating to proceedings that have been heard, or partly heard, by the person before the expiration of that period.
(3B) While a person completes or otherwise continues under subsection (3A) to deal with any matters relating to proceedings that have been heard or partly heard by the person before the expiration of the period of the person’s appointment, the person has all the entitlements and functions of a Judge and, for the purpose of those proceedings, is taken to continue to be a Judge.
(4) A retired Judge of the Court or of another court in New South Wales (including a retired judicial member of the Industrial Commission or the Industrial Relations Commission) may be so appointed even though the retired Judge has reached the mandatory judicial retirement age (or will have reached that age before the appointment expires), but may not be so appointed for any period that extends beyond the day on which he or she reaches the age of 78 years.
(5) The conditions or limitations specified in a commission under this section may exclude the whole or any part of the period of appointment from being regarded as prior judicial service (within the meaning of section 8 of the Judges’ Pensions Act 1953) by the person.
s 11: Am 1988 No 10, Sch 3; 1989 No 169, Sch 5; 1990 No 56, Sch 1; 1991 No 94, Sch 1; 1994 No 32, Sch 3; 1996 No 121, Sch 4.32; 1998 No 49, Sch 18 [1]; 2013 No 1, Sch 1.15 [1]; 2015 No 2, Sch 3.6 [1] [2]; 2018 No 87, Sch 2.5 [2].
11A Supreme Court Judges may act as Land and Environment Court Judges
11A Supreme Court Judges may act as Land and Environment Court Judges
11A Supreme Court Judges may act as Land and Environment Court Judges
(1) This section applies to each of the Judges of the Supreme Court (an eligible judicial officer) other than the following—
(a) the Chief Justice,
(b) the President of the Court of Appeal,
(c) the other Judges of Appeal,
(d) the Chief Judge at Common Law,
(e) the Chief Judge in Equity,
(f) an acting Judge.
(2) An eligible judicial officer may act as a Judge for a particular period or in relation to particular proceedings in the Court if—
(a) the Chief Judge certifies that it is expedient that the eligible judicial officer should act as a Judge of the Court for the period or in relation to the proceedings, and
(b) the eligible judicial officer consents to acting as a Judge for the period or in relation to the proceedings, and
(c) the Chief Justice consents to the eligible judicial officer acting as a Judge for the period or in relation to the proceedings.
(3) The following provisions apply to and in respect of an eligible judicial officer who acts as a Judge of the Court pursuant to the provisions of this section—
(a) the eligible judicial officer has, while acting as a Judge, all the powers, authorities, privileges and immunities of a Judge of the Land and Environment Court,
(b) the eligible judicial officer may attend the sittings of the Court for the purpose of giving judgment in, or otherwise completing, any proceedings which have been heard by the Court while the eligible judicial officer was acting as a Judge in the proceedings even if the eligible judicial officer is no longer acting as a Judge,
(c) the eligible judicial officer is not, while receiving remuneration as a Judge of the Supreme Court, entitled to remuneration for acting as a Judge of the Land and Environment Court,
(d) any service of the eligible judicial officer while acting as a Judge is taken for all purposes (including for the purposes of the Supreme Court Act 1970 and the Judges’ Pensions Act 1953) to be service as a Judge of the Supreme Court,
(e) nothing in this Act or any other law requires the eligible judicial officer to devote the whole of his or her time to the duties of acting as a Judge of the Land and Environment Court.
s 11A: Ins 2010 No 63, Sch 1.11.
Division 3 Commissioners
Division 3 Commissioners
Division 3 Commissioners
pt 2, div 3, hdg: Am 1998 No 172, Sch 6 [4].
12 Commissioners
12 Commissioners
12 Commissioners
(1) The Governor may appoint any qualified person to be a Commissioner of the Court.
(2) A person is qualified to be appointed as a Commissioner if the person has, in the opinion of the Minister—
(a) special knowledge of and experience in the administration of local government or town planning,
(b) suitable qualifications and experience in town or country planning or environmental planning,
(c) special knowledge of and experience in environmental science or matters relating to the protection of the environment and environmental assessment,
(d) special knowledge of and experience in the law and practice of land valuation,
(e) suitable qualifications and experience in architecture, engineering, surveying or building construction,
(f) special knowledge of and experience in the management of natural resources or the administration and management of Crown lands, lands acquired under the Closer Settlement Acts and other lands of the Crown, or
(g) suitable knowledge of matters concerning land rights for Aborigines and qualifications and experience suitable for the determination of disputes involving Aborigines, or
(h) special knowledge of and experience in urban design or heritage.
(2AA) A person is also qualified to be appointed as a Commissioner if the person is an Australian lawyer.
(2AB) In appointing Commissioners, the Minister should ensure, as far as practicable, that the Court is comprised of persons who hold qualifications across the range of areas specified in subsections (2) and (2AA).
(2AC) While exercising the jurisdiction of the Court or any other function under this Act in relation to proceedings in Class 8 of the Court’s jurisdiction, a Commissioner may be called a “Commissioner for Mining”.
(2A) A person may be appointed as a full-time Commissioner or a part-time Commissioner.
(2B) A person appointed as a part-time Commissioner is guilty of misbehaviour if, during the term of his or her appointment, the person appears as an expert witness, or acts as the representative of any party, in proceedings before the Court.
(2C) A person appointed as a Commissioner may, despite the expiration of the term of the person’s appointment, complete or otherwise continue to deal with any matters relating to proceedings that have been heard or partly heard, or a conciliation conference that has been presided over or partly presided over, by the person before the expiration of that term.
(2D) While a person completes or otherwise continues under subsection (2C) to deal with any matters relating to proceedings that have been heard or partly heard by the person, or conciliation conferences that have been presided over or partly presided over, before the expiration of the term of the person’s appointment, the person has all the entitlements and functions of a Commissioner and, for the purpose of those proceedings or conferences, is taken to continue to be a Commissioner.
(3) One of the full-time Commissioners may, by the instrument of the Commissioner’s appointment or by a subsequent instrument, be appointed to be Senior Commissioner.
(4) Schedule 1 has
This is an opening excerpt, not the complete document.