25COrders for validity of development consents

#### 25C Orders for validity of development consents 25C Orders for validity of development consents > > (1) On application by the Minister or any other consent authority for an order under this subsection on the grounds that the terms specified under section 25B have been substantially complied with and that it is not proposed that the relevant development consent be regranted with alterations, the Court may make an order— > > > > > (a) declaring that the terms have been substantially complied with, and > > > > > (b) declaring that the consent is valid, and > > > > > (c) revoking the order of suspension. > > > (2) On application by the Minister or any other consent authority for an order under this subsection on the ground that the terms specified under section 25B have been substantially complied with and that the development consent has been regranted with alterations as referred to in section 4.61 of the [Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979](/view/html/inforce/current/act-1979-203), the Court may make an order— > > > > > (a) declaring that the terms have been complied with, and > > > > > (b) declaring that the development consent has been validly regranted, and > > > > > (c) declaring that the suspended development consent has been revoked, and > > > > > (d) revoking the order of suspension. > > **s 25C:** Ins 1997 No 81, Sch 2. Am 1997 No 152, Sch 4.18 \[9\] \[10\]; 1999 No 31, Sch 2.20 \[3\]; 2020 No 30, Sch 2.23\[7\].